Hi All... Simple query gives confusion to me
Hi all,
In oracle table, I have a value for a column as below.The column datatype is VARCHAR2(60).
'BCLCO
126-2002EL-G-19P
CHUNIT RABA
EIRAMTES'
I want to pass the value of column into another variable in the following format.
'BCLCO126-2002EL-G-19PCHUNIT RABAEIRAMTES' .
I mean to say inside the string value, we need to remove the ^M(end of line). This has to be done through Orcale.
Pls do needful.
select replace(your_col, chr(10)) from your_table;
should replace your cr's with nothing
regards
Similar Messages
-
Simple query takes 18 minutes to retrieve data....
Hi,
I am facing this problem at the customer site where a simple query on a table takes 18 minutes or more. Please find below the details.
Table Structure
CREATE TABLE dsp_data
quantum_id NUMBER(11) NOT NULL,
src NUMBER(11) NOT NULL,
call_status NUMBER(11) NOT NULL,
dst NUMBER(11) NOT NULL,
measurement_id NUMBER(11) NOT NULL,
is_originating NUMBER(1) NOT NULL,
measurement_value NUMBER(15,4) NOT NULL,
data_type_id NUMBER(3) NOT NULL,
data VARCHAR2(200) NOT NULL
TABLESPACE dsp_data_tspace
STORAGE (PCTINCREASE 0 INITIAL 100K NEXT 1024K)
PARTITION BY RANGE (quantum_id)
(PARTITION dsp_data_default VALUES LESS THAN (100));
CREATE INDEX dsp_data_idx ON dsp_data
quantum_id,
src,
call_status,
dst,
measurement_id,
is_originating,
measurement_value,
data_type_id
TABLESPACE dsp_data_idx_tspace
LOCAL;
CREATE INDEX dsp_data_src_idx ON dsp_data
src
TABLESPACE dsp_data_idx_tspace
LOCAL;
CREATE INDEX dsp_data_dst_idx ON dsp_data
dst
TABLESPACE dsp_data_idx_tspace
LOCAL;
ALTER TABLE dsp_data
ADD CONSTRAINT fk_dsp_data_1
FOREIGN KEY
quantum_id
REFERENCES mds_measurement_intervals
quantum_id
ALTER TABLE dsp_data
ADD CONSTRAINT fk_dsp_data_2
FOREIGN KEY
data_type_id
REFERENCES mds_drilldown_types
type_id
ALTER TABLE dsp_data
ADD CONSTRAINT pk_dsp_data
PRIMARY KEY
quantum_id,
src,
call_status,
dst,
measurement_id,
is_originating,
measurement_value,
data_type_id,
data
USING INDEX
TABLESPACE dsp_data_idx_tspace
LOCAL;
Table Space Creation
All table space creation is done using following command
CREATE TABLESPACE [tablespaceName]
DATAFILE [tablespaceDatafile] SIZE 500M REUSE
AUTOEXTEND ON NEXT 10240K
DEFAULT STORAGE ( INITIAL 1024K
NEXT 1024K
MINEXTENTS 10
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0
Server Configuration on CUtsomer Site
(1) 2 x Dual PA8900 Proc = 4GHz
(2) RAM = 16GB
(3) 3 x Internal HDDs
(4) 1 x External MSA-30 storage array (oracle db)
Record Information On Customer Site
select count(*) from dsp_data;
COUNT(*)
181931197
select min (quantum_id) from dsp_data where dst=2;
This takes 18 minutes or more....
SQL> SQL> SQL> explain plan for select min (quantum_id) from dsp_data where dst=2;
Explained.
SQL> @?/rdbms/admin/utlxpls
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 999040277
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 14 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 14 | | | | |
| 2 | FIRST ROW | | 92 | 1288 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 3 | PARTITION RANGE ALL | | 92 | 1288 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 | 29 |
|* 4 | INDEX FULL SCAN (MIN/MAX)| DSP_DATA_IDX | 92 | 1288 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 | 29 |
As mentioned above the query takes 18 minutes or more. This is a critical issue at customer. Can you please give your suggestions how to improve and reduce the query time. Thanks in advance.Hi,
I did the following changes in the indexes of table.
drop index DSP_DATA_IDX;
create index DSP_DATA_MEASUREMENT_ID_IDX on DSP_DATA (MEASUREMENT_ID) TABLESPACE dsp_data_idx_tspace LOCAL;
After that I did explain plan,
explain plan for select min(QUANTUM_ID) from mds.DSP_DATA where SRC=11;
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 11 | 3 (0
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 11 |
| 2 | FIRST ROW | | 430K| 4626K| 3 (0
| 3 | PARTITION RANGE ALL | | 430K| 4626K| 3 (0
| 4 | INDEX FULL SCAN (MIN/MAX)| PK_DSP_DATA | 430K| 4626K| 3 (0
Note
- 'PLAN_TABLE' is old version
14 rows selected
SELECT table_name, index_name, monitoring, used FROM v$object_usage;
TABLE_NAME INDEX_NAME MONITORING USED
DSP_DATA DSP_DATA_SRC_IDX YES NO
It seems that DSP_DATA_SRC_IDX is not getting used in query. What changes do i need to make so that DSP_DATA_SRC_IDX index gets used.
Also, you have stated that to create global index on src and dst. How do i create them.
Thanks in Advance.
Edited by: 780707 on Jul 8, 2010 11:58 PM -
consider this situation,
Two or more productid will be accquired by same customerid, by same shipvia, on the same day of the week of shipped date. i want the simple query for this.
my tables are from northwind:
[orders] = OrderID, CustomerID, EmployeeID, OrderDate, RequiredDate, ShippedDate, ShipVia, Freight, ShipName, ShipAddress, ShipCity, ShipRegion, ShipPostalCode, ShipCountry.
[orders details] = OrderID, ProductID, UnitPrice, Quantity, Discount.
i tried some but it is not exact, it gives wrong result.
select pd.CustomerID,pd.ProductID, pd.no_of_time_purchased, sd.ShipVia, sd.same_ship_count, shipped_day from
select ProductID,o.CustomerID,COUNT(productid) as no_of_time_purchased
from orders o join [Order Details] od on o.OrderID=od.OrderID group by ProductID,o.CustomerID
having count(od.ProductID) >1) pd
join
(select OrderID,customerid, shipvia, count(shipvia)as same_ship_count, DATENAME(DW,ShippedDate)as shipped_day from orders
group by customerid, ShipVia, ShippedDate having COUNT(ShipVia) > 1 ) sd
on sd.CustomerID=pd.CustomerIDHi,
I think I have a solution that will at least give you a clue how to go about it. I have simplified the tables you mentioned and created them as temporary tables on my side, with some fake data to test with. I have incldued the generation of these temporary
tables for your review.
In my example I have included:
1. A customer which has purchased the same product on the same day, using the same ship 3 times,
2. Another example the same as the first but the third purchase was on a different day
3. Another example the same as the first but the third purchase was a different product
4. Another example the same as the first but the third purchase was using a different "ShipVia".
You should be able to see that by grouping on all of the columns that you wich to return, you should not need to perform any subselects.
Please let me know if I have missed any requirements.
Hope this helps:
CREATE TABLE #ORDERS
OrderID INT,
CustomerID INT,
OrderDate DATETIME,
ShipVia VARCHAR(5)
CREATE TABLE #ORDERS_DETAILS
OrderID INT,
ProductID INT,
INSERT INTO #ORDERS
VALUES
(1, 1, GETDATE(), 'ABC'),
(2, 1, GETDATE(), 'ABC'),
(3, 1, GETDATE(), 'ABC'),
(4, 2, GETDATE() - 4, 'DEF'),
(5, 2, GETDATE() - 4, 'DEF'),
(6, 2, GETDATE() - 5, 'DEF'),
(7, 3, GETDATE() - 10, 'GHI'),
(8, 3, GETDATE() - 10, 'GHI'),
(9, 3, GETDATE() - 10, 'GHI'),
(10, 4, GETDATE() - 10, 'JKL'),
(11, 4, GETDATE() - 10, 'JKL'),
(12, 4, GETDATE() - 10, 'MNO')
INSERT INTO #ORDERS_DETAILS
VALUES
(1, 1),
(2, 1),
(3, 1),
(4, 2),
(5, 2),
(6, 2),
(7, 3),
(8, 3),
(9, 4),
(10, 5),
(11, 5),
(12, 5)
SELECT * FROM #ORDERS
SELECT * FROM #ORDERS_DETAILS
SELECT
O.CustomerID,
OD.ProductID,
O.ShipVia,
COUNT(O.ShipVia),
DATENAME(DW, O.OrderDate) AS [Shipped Day]
FROM #ORDERS O
JOIN #ORDERS_DETAILS OD ON O.orderID = OD.OrderID
GROUP BY OD.ProductID, O.CustomerID, O.ShipVia, DATENAME(DW, O.OrderDate) HAVING COUNT(OD.ProductID) > 1
DROP TABLE #ORDERS
DROP TABLE #ORDERS_DETAILS -
Simple Query returns no result
We have a problem with a simple query on a "old" Table in our Database. The Table has following Structure:
CREATE TABLE <table_name>
ROLE_ID INTEGER NOT NULL,
ROLE_NAME VARCHAR (99) ascii NOT NULL,
OBJECTDATA LONG BYTE,
UNIQUE (ROLE_NAME)
The table containts two rows and following querys get these results:
select role_id, role_name from <schema>.<table_name>
--> 2 rows
select role_id, role_name from <schema>.<table_name>
order by role_id
--> 2 rows
select role_id, role_name from <schema>.<table_name>
order by role_name
--> 0 rows ?? confusion
When we create a "new" table with the same structure, and insert the same content to this new table, the queries are working correctly.
What happened with our "old" table, so that these simple queries don't function anymore?
(Database Kernel 7.6.05 Build 009-123-191-997)
thx
gerri
Edited by: Gerfried on Jul 17, 2009 11:42 AMOk, Gerfried send me the dump file and this is what was in it:
INV ROOT/LEAF 15857 perm entries : 0 [block 0]
bottom : 81 filevers: dummy convvers: 9
writecnt: 1
00001 nodepage.pno: 15857 nodepage.pt : data
00006 nodepage.pt2: inv nodepage.chk: checksumData
00008 nodepage.mde: empty
08181 nd_checksum : 61937 nodepge2.pno: 15857
08189 nodepge2.pt : data nodepge2.pt2: inv
08191 nodepge2.chk: checksumData
08192 nodepge2.mde: empty
00009 nd_bottom : 81 nd_rec_cnt : 0
00017 nd_level : 0
00019 nd_filestate: empty
00020 nd_sorted : false nd_root : 15857/F13D0000
00025 nd_right : nil_pno nd_left : nil_pno
00033 nd_last : nil_pno nd_conv_vers: 9
00045 nd_str_vers : nil_pno nd_file_vers: dummy
00052 ndPageVersio: 0 nd_inv_usage: 0
00057 nd_leaf_cnt : 1 nd_treeleavs: nil
00065 nd_trans_id : nil ndInvRoot : nil_pno
00077 nd_write_cnt: 1
END OF FILE
Obviously the reason for not delivering any data for the query is: this index is empty.
See "nd_filestate: empty" !
For some reasons (that I really don't know - sorry about that) this index had not been maintained anymore, since a very long time.
"nd_conv_vers: 9" tells us that it was the 9th savepoint that wrote down this page to the disks and that it had not been touched since then.
To view the current converter version you may just use the db_restartinfo command in dbmcli.
If you were a SAP customer the next thing I'd check would be with which database version these indexes had been created, what the internal file state is etc. - just to figure out the root cause.
As such an analysis is basically not possible via this forum all I can propose is to look for those indexes (containing 0 entries although the table has more rows) and rebuild them.
This statement should do the trick:
select i.owner, i.indexname, i.tablename, if.*
from files if join files tf on if.primaryfileid=tf.fileid
join indexes i on if.fileid=i.fileid
where if.entrycount =0
and if.type ='INDEX'
and tf.entrycount >0
best regards,
Lars -
Select query gives error in Code inspector and extended program check
Hi,
I have a query .
SELECT pernr
FROM pa9100
INTO TABLE t_nca_tab
WHERE endda EQ c_date AND
z_nca_required EQ c_yes.
This query gives me an error in Code inspector like :
Large table pa0001: No first field of table index in WHERE condition
I have one more query that gives error in extended program check
SELECT SINGLE stell ename
INTO (g_stell, g_name)
FROM pa0001
WHERE pernr EQ wa_nca_tab-pernr AND
endda EQ c_date.
The warning says:
*In "SELECT SINGLE ...", the WHERE condition for the key field "SEQNR" does not
test for equality. Therefore, the single record in question may not be unique.*
Its too urgent.
Please reply.
Regards,
Binay.The first field is PERNR .. so if UR not giving pernr it will fetch
all the data from the said table and between the given dates ..
Check if this is your requirement ...
write the select as ...
where r_pernr is a range ...
SELECT pernr
FROM pa9100
INTO TABLE t_nca_tab
WHERE pernr in r_pernr <----
endda EQ c_date AND
z_nca_required EQ c_yes.
As UR using select single it's expecting to use all the key
fields in the where condition ...
U can ignore this warning message -
Simple Query in Oracle Linked Table in MS Access causes full table scan.
I am running a very simple query in MS ACCESS to a linked Oracle table as follows:
Select *
From EXPRESS_SERVICE_EVENTS --(the linked table name refers to EXPRESS.SERVICE_EVENTS)
Where performed > MyDate()
or
Select *
From EXPRESS_SERVICE_EVENTS --(the linked table name refers to EXPRESS.SERVICE_EVENTS)
Where performed > [Forms]![MyForm]![Date1]
We have over 50 machines and this query runs fine on over half of these, using an Oracle Index on the "performed" field. Running exactly the same thing on the other machines causes a full table scan, therefore ignoring the Index (all machines access the same Access DB).
Strangely, if we write the query as follows:
Select *
From EXPRESS_SERVICE_EVENTS
Where performed > #09/04/2009 08:00#
it works fast everywhere!
Any help on this 'phenominon' would be appreciated.
Things we've done:
Checked regional settings, ODBC driver settings, MS Access settings (as in Tools->Options), we have the latest XP and Office service packs, and re-linked all Access Tables on both the slow and fast machines independantly).Primarily, thanks gdarling for your reply. This solved our problem.
Just a small note to those who may be using this thread.
Although this might not be the reason, my PC had Oracle 9iR2 installed with Administratiev Tools, where user machines had the same thing installed but using Runtime Installation. For some reason, my PC did not have 'bind date' etc. as an option in the workarounds, but user machines did have this workaround option. Strangely, although I did not have the option, my (ODBC) query was running as expected, but user queries were not.
When we set the workaround checkbox accordingly, the queries then run as expected (fast).
Once again,
Thanks -
Simple Query working on 10G and not working on 11gR2 after upgrade
Hi Folks,
This is the first time i am posting the query in this Blog.
I have a small issue which preventing the UAT Sigoff.
Simple query working fine on 10.2.0.1 and after upgrade to 11.2.0.1 its error out
10.2.0.4:
=====
SQL> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM APPS.HZ_PARTIES HP WHERE ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY= 'PROPERTY' AND ATTRIBUTE1=1;
COUNT(*)
1
SQL> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM APPS.HZ_PARTIES HP WHERE ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY= 'PROPERTY' AND ATTRIBUTE1=00001;
COUNT(*)
1
SQL> select ATTRIBUTE1 FROM APPS.HZ_PARTIES HP WHERE ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY= 'PROPERTY' AND ATTRIBUTE1=1;
ATTRIBUTE1
00001
11.2.0.1:
=====
SQL> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM APPS.HZ_PARTIES HP WHERE ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY= 'PROPERTY' AND ATTRIBUTE1=1
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01722: invalid number
SQL> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM APPS.HZ_PARTIES HP WHERE ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY= 'PROPERTY' AND ATTRIBUTE1=00001
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01722: invalid number
SQL> select ATTRIBUTE1 FROM APPS.HZ_PARTIES HP WHERE ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY= 'PROPERTY' AND ATTRIBUTE1='1';
no rows selected
SQL> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM APPS.HZ_PARTIES HP WHERE ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY= 'PROPERTY' AND ATTRIBUTE1='00001';
COUNT(*)
1
SQL> select ATTRIBUTE1 FROM APPS.HZ_PARTIES HP WHERE ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY= 'PROPERTY' AND ATTRIBUTE1='00001';
ATTRIBUTE1
00001
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
SQL > desc APPS.HZ_PARTIES
Name Type
======== ======
ATTRIBUTE1 VARCHAR2(150)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Changes:
Recently i upgraded the DB from 10.2.0.4 to 11.2.0.1
Query:
1.If the type of that row is VARCHAR,why it is working in 10.2.0.4 and why not working in 11.2.0.1
2.after upgrade i analyzed the table with "analyze table " query for all AP,AR,GL,HR,BEN,APPS Schemas--Is it got impact if we run analyze table.
Please provide me the answer for above two questions or refer the document is also well enough to understand.Based on the Answer client will sigoff to-day.
Thanks,
P KumarWhiteHat wrote:
the issue has already been identified: in oracle versions prior to 11, there was an implicit conversion of numbers to characters. your database has a character field which you are attempting to compare to a number.
i.e. the string '000001' is not in any way equivalent to the number 1. but Oracle 10 converts '000001' to a number because you are asking it to compare to the number you have provided.
version 11 doesn't do this anymore (and rightly so).
the issue is with the bad code design. you can either: use characters in the predicate (where field = 'parameter') or you can do a conversion of the field prior to comparing (where to_num(field) = parameter).
I would suggest that you should fix your code and don't assume that '000001' = 1I don't think that the above is completely correct, and a simple demonstration will show why. First, a simple table on Oracle Database 10.2.0.4:
CREATE TABLE T1(C1 VARCHAR2(20));
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('1');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('0001');
COMMIT;A select from the above table, relying on implicit data type conversion:
SELECT
FROM
T1
WHERE
C1=1;
C1
1
0001Technically, the second row should not have been returned as an exact match. Why was it returned, let's take a look at the actual execution plan:
SELECT
FROM
TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR(NULL,NULL,NULL));
SQL_ID g6gvbpsgj1dvf, child number 0
SELECT * FROM T1 WHERE C1=1
Plan hash value: 3617692013
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 2 (100)| |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1 | 2 | 24 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - filter(TO_NUMBER("C1")=1)
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statementNotice that the VARCHAR2 column was converted to a NUMBER, so if there was any data in that column that could not be converted to a number (or NULL), we should receive an error (unless the bad rows are already removed due to another predicate in the WHERE clause). For example:
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('.0001.');
SELECT
FROM
T1
WHERE
C1=1;
SQL> SELECT
2 *
3 FROM
4 T1
5 WHERE
6 C1=1;
ERROR:
ORA-01722: invalid numberNow the same test on Oracle Database 11.1.0.7:
CREATE TABLE T1(C1 VARCHAR2(20));
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('1');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('0001');
COMMIT;
SELECT
FROM
T1
WHERE
C1=1;
C1
1
0001
SELECT
FROM
TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR(NULL,NULL,NULL));
SQL_ID g6gvbpsgj1dvf, child number 0
SELECT * FROM T1 WHERE C1=1
Plan hash value: 3617692013
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 2 (100)| |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1 | 2 | 24 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - filter(TO_NUMBER("C1")=1)
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('.0001.');
SELECT
FROM
T1
WHERE
C1=1;
SQL> SELECT
2 *
3 FROM
4 T1
5 WHERE
6 C1=1;
ERROR:
ORA-01722: invalid numberAs you can see, exactly the same actual execution plan, and the same end result.
The OP needs to determine if non-numeric data now exists in the column. Was the database characterset possibly changed during/after the upgrade?
Charles Hooper
Co-author of "Expert Oracle Practices: Oracle Database Administration from the Oak Table"
http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/
IT Manager/Oracle DBA
K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc. -
Trying to optimize this simple query
Hi,
I am trying to optimize this simple query but the two methods I am trying actually make things worse.
The original query is:
SELECT customer_number, customer_name
FROM bsc_pdt_account_mv
where rownum <= 100
AND Upper(customer_name) like '%SP%'
AND customer_id IN
SELECT cust_id FROM bsc_pdt_assoc_sales_force_mv
WHERE area_identifier IN (
SELECT area_identifier FROM bsc_pdt_assoc_sales_force_mv
WHERE ad_identifier = '90004918' or rm_identifier = '90004918' or tm_identifier = '90004918'
The result set of this query returns me the first 100 rows in 88 seconds and they are all distinct by default (don't know why they are distinct).
My first attempt was to try to use table joins instead of the IN conditions:
SELECT
distinct -- A: I need to use distinct now
customer_number, customer_name
FROM bsc_pdt_account_mv pdt,
bsc_pdt_assoc_sales_force_mv asf,
SELECT distinct area_identifier FROM bsc_pdt_assoc_sales_force_mv
WHERE ad_identifier = '90004918' or rm_identifier = '90004918' or tm_identifier = '90004918'
) area
where
area.area_identifier = asf.area_identifier
AND asf.cust_id = pdt.customer_id
AND Upper(customer_name) like '%SP%'
AND rownum <= 100 -- B: strange when I comment this out
order by 1
I dont understand two things with this query. First issue, I now need to put in the distinct because the result set is not distinct by default. Second issue (very strange), when I put the rownum condition (<100) I get two rows in 1.5 seconds. If I remove the condition, I get 354 rows (whole result set) in 326 seconds.
My second attempt was to use EXISTS instead of IN:
SELECT
customer_number, customer_name
FROM bsc_pdt_account_mv pdt
where Upper(customer_name) like '%SP%'
AND rownum <= 100
AND EXISTS
select 1 from
bsc_pdt_assoc_sales_force_mv asf,
SELECT distinct area_identifier FROM bsc_pdt_assoc_sales_force_mv
WHERE ad_identifier = '90004918' or rm_identifier = '90004918' or tm_identifier = '90004918'
) area
where
area.area_identifier = asf.area_identifier
AND asf.cust_id = pdt.customer_id
This query returns a similar distinct result set as teh original one but takes pretty much the same time (87 seconds).The query below hangs when run in TOAD or PL/SQL Dev. I noticed there is no rows returned from the inner table for this condition.
SELECT customer_number, customer_name
FROM
bsc_pdt_account_mv pdt_account
where rownum <= 100
AND exists (
SELECT pdt_sales_force.cust_id
FROM bsc_pdt_assoc_sales_force_mv pdt_sales_force
WHERE pdt_account.customer_id = pdt_sales_force.cust_id
AND (pdt_sales_force.rm_identifier = '90007761' or pdt_sales_force.tm_identifier = '90007761') )
ORDER BY customer_name
-- No rows returned by this query
SELECT pdt_sales_force.cust_id
FROM bsc_pdt_assoc_sales_force_mv pdt_sales_force
WHERE pdt_sales_force.rm_identifier = '90007761' or pdt_sales_force.tm_identifier = '90007761' -
Simple query takes time to run
Hi,
I have a simple query whcih takes about 20 mins to run.. here is the TKPROF forit:
SELECT
SY2.QBAC0,
sum(decode(SALES_ORDER.SDCRCD,'USD', SALES_ORDER.SDAEXP,'CAD', SALES_ORDER.SDAEXP /1.0452))
FROM
JDE.F5542SY2 SY2,
JDE.F42119 SALES_ORDER,
JDE.F0116 SHIP_TO,
JDE.F5542SY1 SY1,
JDE.F4101 PRODUCT_INFO
WHERE
( SHIP_TO.ALAN8=SALES_ORDER.SDSHAN )
AND ( SY1.QANRAC=SY2.QBNRAC and SY1.QAOTCD=SY2.QBOTCD )
AND ( PRODUCT_INFO.IMITM=SALES_ORDER.SDITM )
AND ( SY2.QBSHAN=SALES_ORDER.SDSHAN )
AND ( SALES_ORDER.SDLNTY NOT IN ('H ','HC','I ') )
AND ( PRODUCT_INFO.IMSRP1 Not In (' ','000','689') )
AND ( SALES_ORDER.SDDCTO IN ('CO','CR','SA','SF','SG','SP','SM','SO','SL','SR') )
AND (
( SY1.QACTR=SHIP_TO.ALCTR )
AND ( PRODUCT_INFO.IMSRP1=SY1.QASRP1 )
GROUP BY
SY2.QBAC0
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.07 0.07 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 10 92.40 929.16 798689 838484 0 131
total 12 92.48 929.24 798689 838484 0 131
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 62
Rows Row Source Operation
131 SORT GROUP BY
3535506 HASH JOIN
4026100 HASH JOIN
922 TABLE ACCESS FULL OBJ#(187309)
3454198 HASH JOIN
80065 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN OBJ#(30492) (object id 30492)
3489670 HASH JOIN
65192 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN OBJ#(30457) (object id 30457)
3489936 PARTITION RANGE ALL PARTITION: 1 9
3489936 TABLE ACCESS FULL OBJ#(30530) PARTITION: 1 9
97152 TABLE ACCESS FULL OBJ#(187308)
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.07 0.07 0 0 0 0
Execute 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 10 92.40 929.16 798689 838484 0 131
total 13 92.48 929.24 798689 838484 0 131
Misses in library cache during parse: 1kindly suggest how to resolve this...
OS is windows and its 9i DB...
Thanks> ... you want to get rid of the IN statements.
They prevent Oracle from usering the index.
SQL> create table mytable (id,num,description)
2 as
3 select level
4 , case level
5 when 0 then 0
6 when 1 then 1
7 else 2
8 end
9 , 'description ' || to_char(level)
10 from dual
11 connect by level <= 10000
12 /
Table created.
SQL> create index i1 on mytable(num)
2 /
Index created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'mytable')
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> set autotrace on explain
SQL> select id
2 , num
3 , description
4 from mytable
5 where num in (0,1)
6 /
ID NUM DESCRIPTION
1 1 description 1
1 row selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 2172953059
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 5001 | 112K| 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | INLIST ITERATOR | | | | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MYTABLE | 5001 | 112K| 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I1 | 5001 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
3 - access("NUM"=0 OR "NUM"=1)Regards,
Rob. -
Hi ,
I'm running the following simple query in sql*plus on ORACLE9i. But this query stopped running after 30minutes, and the sql*plus die at the same time .I have no idea about this. Could somebody tell me how I can solve this problem. Thank you very much for your help.
Select Distinct PERSADDRUSE. ADDRUSECD as "Application", PERS.PERSNBR as "Account",
(PERS.FIRSTNAME || ' '|| PERS.MDLINIT ||' ' || PERS.LASTNAME ) as "Name1",' 'as "Name2",' 'as "Name3",
AL1.TEXT as "Address1",AL2.TEXT as "Address2",AL3.TEXT as "Address3",
(ADDR.CITYNAME ||' ' || ' '||ADDR.STATECD ||' '||ADDR.ZIPCD||' '|| ADDR.ZIPSUF) as "CityStateZip"
From PERSADDRUSE
Join PERS
ON PERS.PERSNBR = PERSADDRUSE.PERSNBR
--AND PERS.ADDDATE = '12-JAN-2005'
AND PERSADDRUSE.ADDRUSECD = 'PRI'
join ADDR
ON PERSADDRUSE.ADDRNBR = ADDR.ADDRNBR
left JOIN ADDRLINE AL1
ON ADDR.ADDRNBR = AL1.ADDRNBR
AND AL1.LINENBR = 1
left JOIN ADDRLINE AL2
ON ADDR.ADDRNBR = AL2.ADDRNBR
AND AL2.LINENBR = 2
left JOIN ADDRLINE AL3
ON ADDR.ADDRNBR = AL3.ADDRNBR
AND AL3.LINENBR = 3;Thanks for reply. I have some other query running for 45m and it seems fine. The following are the explain plan I print out. I'm new to PL/SQL.Could you guys give me some other ideas?
BMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY()(PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT)
PERSADDRUSE | 5726 | 68712 | 183 |'), DBMS_XPLAN_TYPE('| 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| PERS | 161K| 2839K| 431 |'), DBMS_XPLAN_TYPE('| 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ADDR | 239K| 5145K| 298 |'), DBMS_XPLAN_TYPE('| 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ADDRLINE | 82087 | 1683K| 240 |'), DBMS_XPLAN_TYPE('| 11 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ADDRLINE | 82087 | 1683K| 240 |'), DBMS_XPLAN_TYPE('| 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ADDRLINE | 82087 | 1683K| 240 |'), DBMS_XPLAN_TYPE('------------------------------------------------------------------------'), DBMS_XPLAN_TYPE(' '), DBMS_XPLAN_TYPE('Note: cpu costing is off, PLAN_TABLE'' is old version')) -
Simple query ... syntax error ?
What is wrong with this simple sql statement ?
SELECT Caseid
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT Caseid, userid FROM Atts)
I get this error
Server: Msg 170, Level 15, State 1, Line 2
Line 2: Incorrect syntax near ')'.In this case, it could go either way. Because the derived
table is
performing the select distinct anyway, the execution plans
would be similar,
but you'd see one extra step for selecting all rows from the
derived table.
Notice that the derived table has distinct caseid, userid,
but the main
query only selects caseid. If the extra IO required to
transmit the
unwanted userid column is more expensive than the extra step
required to
select just the caseid column out of the derived table, then
the derived
table is the better choice.
In any case, the simpler query is usually the better option.
Unless he
actually wants a duplicate caseid for each userid, but not
the userid
itself, plain ol' SELECT DISTINCT makes more sense.
"bregent" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:ejaad1$k2u$[email protected]..
> >On the contrary, subqueries in the FROM clause are
quite useful and can
> >in
> >the right situations perform much better than
alternative queries.
>
> Ah, as usual you are correct. It looks like he forgot to
add a DT alias
> name
> at the end of the statement which is causing the error.
But in any case, a
> simple select distinct would yield the same results and
performance,
> correct?
> -
Query should fetch all the query details in the system.
Hi All
We are looking for a query which will fetch all the query details in the system along with the user names either who has created the query or who has run it atleast once.
If any of the queries are not used for a long time then we can delete it with the user's/owner's approval.
Is there anyway we can desing such query .
Thanks
AsimHi,
Thanks for the reply.
My requirement is that we want to create a new query which should fetch the details information of already existing queries.
Like who has created that query, how frequently the use it etc...
Whenever we run the new query it should give information of all other existing queries.
Thanks and Regards
Asim -
How I can delete a row using a simple query?
SZSLIFE_SPRIDEN_PIDM SZSLIFE_SGBSTDN_TERM_CODE_EFF SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_BLDG_CODE SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_ROOM_NUMBER SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_BEGIN_DATE SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_END_DATE
48547 199890
48547 199990
48547 199990 BLU 205 09/03/1999 12/23/1999
48547 200010
48547 200010 BLU 205 01/25/2000 05/25/2000
48547 200090
48547 200090 MOR 406 09/03/2000 12/23/2000
48547 200110
48547 200110 MOR 406 01/25/2001 05/25/2001
48547 200190
48547 200210
48547 200290
48547 200310
48547 200390
48547 200410
48547 200610
Here is what a simple question is probably for some of you; I can not get this to work. I need to delete all the rows that are duplicate like row #2 with the same SZSLIFE_SGBSTDN_TERM_CODE_EFF but with not
SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_BLDG_CODE and SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_ROOM_NUMBER
I need to write a code where it counts the SZSLIFE_SGBSTDN_TERM_CODE_EFF and if it have the same (2 times.
I need to delete the row without SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_BLDG_CODE and SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_ROOM_NUMBER
The SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_BLDG_CODE NEEDS to be not null, because I do an insert in this table I need to be able to insert null values.
How I can use a simple query where I can delete all the duplicate records without bldg_code and room number…
Here is the table description
SZSLIFE_SPRIDEN_PIDM NUMBER(8)
SZSLIFE_SPRIDEN_ID VARCHAR2(10)
SZSLIFE_SPRIDEN_LAST_NAME VARCHAR2(60)
SZSLIFE_SPRIDEN_FIRST_NAME VARCHAR2(60)
SZSLIFE_SPRIDEN_MI VARCHAR2(15)
SZSLIFE_SGBSTDN_TERM_CODE_EFF VARCHAR2(6)
SZSLIFE_SGBSTDN_STST_CODE VARCHAR2(2)
SZSLIFE_STVSTST_DESC VARCHAR2(30)
SZSLIFE_SGBSTDN_STYP_CODE VARCHAR2(2)
SZSLIFE_STVSTYP_DESC VARCHAR2(30)
SZSLIFE_SGBSTDN_LEVL_CODE VARCHAR2(2)
SZSLIFE_STVLEVL_DESC VARCHAR2(30)
SZSLIFE_SGBSTDN_RESD_CODE VARCHAR2(10)
SZSLIFE_STVRESD_DESC VARCHAR2(40)
SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_BLDG_CODE VARCHAR2(10)
SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_ROOM_NUMBER VARCHAR2(10)
SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_BEGIN_DATE VARCHAR2(12)
SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_END_DATE VARCHAR2(12)
SLRRASG_ASCD_CODE VARCHAR2(2)
I will appreciate any help!
SLRRASG_ROLL_IND VARCHAR2(2)Thank you very much Sandeep, this works!
1 DELETE SZSLIFE_TEMP2
2 WHERE
3 SZSLIFE_SGBSTDN_TERM_CODE_EFF
4 IN
5 (SELECT SZSLIFE_SGBSTDN_TERM_CODE_EFF
6 FROM SZSLIFE_TEMP2
7 GROUP BY
8 SZSLIFE_SGBSTDN_TERM_CODE_EFF
9 HAVING COUNT(*) > 1)
10 AND
11* SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_BLDG_CODE = ' '
12 /
4 rows deleted.
The only thing here is that the SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_BLDG_CODE can not be defined as a a NULL, so I can not use
where SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_BLDG_CODE is null
Here is how those two columns are define:
SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_BLDG_CODE VARCHAR2(10)
SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_ROOM_NUMBER VARCHAR2(10)
So,
my question is it will be safe to do SZSLIFE_SLRRASG_BLDG_CODE = ' ' ?
Again, it works, it deleted the rfows that I wanted...
Thank you very much!!!
Rogelio -
SSAS source Query, Simple Query with never ending refresh time.
Hello...
A very simple query based on SSAS cube do not give answer. :-(
I start a trace to see the exact mdx statement transmited to SSAS, run it in a query editor, the result is... immediate !
Is there any clue to explain such a behavior ? cube meta data definition ?
Any help is welcome
===========
Version: 2.21.3974.242hello,
find below the capture of the trace, cannot see any references to rowsets either cellsets...
thank you for your help
select{[Measures].[Fact Count]}on 0,nonempty(crossjoin([Invoice Attributes].[Scenario].[Scenario].allmembers,[Period Date].[Month].[Month].allmembers,[Period Date].[Quarter].[Quarter].allmembers,[Period Date].[Year].[Year].allmembers,[Product Line Techno].[Product
Line Code].[Product Line Code].allmembers),{[Measures].[Fact Count]})properties member_caption,member_unique_name on 1 from(select([Invoice Attributes].[Scenario].&[ACTUALS],[Period Date].[Month].&[20150101],[Product Line Techno].[Product Line Code].&[EB])on
0 from [Revenue Detailed])cell properties value
<PropertyList xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xml-analysis">
<Catalog>OLAP12</Catalog>
<SspropInitAppName>Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio - Query</SspropInitAppName>
<LocaleIdentifier>1036</LocaleIdentifier>
<ClientProcessID>5992</ClientProcessID>
<Format>Native</Format>
<AxisFormat>TupleFormat</AxisFormat>
<Content>SchemaData</Content>
<Timeout>0</Timeout>
<DbpropMsmdActivityID>284bd120-34f1-4fac-83cb-e8cf443261ad</DbpropMsmdActivityID>
<DbpropMsmdRequestID>f11764e9-b092-41ea-aae6-a91763960eae</DbpropMsmdRequestID>
</PropertyList> -
I have a table where I have data shown below. Now, I want to write a simple query which lists me the project and the count of the distinct effective dates for which data is existant there.
Sample data:
Project Task Effective Date (xx_proj_task_data)
101 T1 01-Jan-2008
101 T1 01-Feb-2008
101 T1 01-Mar-2008
101 T2 01-Jan-2008
101 T2 01-Apr-2008
101 T3 01-Apr-2008
102 T1 01-Jan-2008
102 T1 01-Feb-2008
102 T2 01-Apr-2008
103 T1 01-Jan-2008
103 T1 01-Feb-2008
103 T1 01-Mar-2008
103 T1 01-Apr-2008
103 T2 01-May-2008
103 T3 01-Jun-2008
103 T1 01-Jan-2008
103 T1 01-Aug-2008
103 T2 01-Apr-2008
Output Reqd:
Project Count(Distinct Effective Dates)
101 4
102 3
103 7
I can write a query that says:
select project_id, count(1)
from (select distinct project_id, effective_date
from xx_proj_task_data) x
group by project_id;
But, is there a way I can achieve the same by avoiding the inner Query (x) and just by a simple query ?
Thanks!Try below query:
select project_id
, count(distinct effective_date)
from xx_proj_task_data
group by project_id;
--venkata
Maybe you are looking for
-
What are the performance tradeoffs when using more than one EntityStore?
Hi, I have different accounts where each account has the same set of Entity classes. I don't know yet wheter to have one EntityStore for each account or have one EntityStore for all accounts together and do a lot of 'joining' when retrieving Entities
-
Can someone tell me where VZW_Software_upgrade_assistant came from?
VZW_Software_upgrade_assistant.exe is a file on my hard disk. I didn't intentionally download it. Where did it come from? Why do I need it? After I connect my cell phone to my PC with a USB cable In Windows Explorer a windows appears that list
-
Err : "Access Not Allowed to oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement"
Hi, How to resolve the error "Access Not Allowed to oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement" in jdeveloper? Or Can you please give me some sample pgms which uses oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement? Thanks in advance, Senthil Kumar M.
-
PROCESS CODE IN INBOUND SIDE(ALE-IDOCs)
HI, pls can you tell me procedure for creating PROCESS CODE IN standalone method.
-
Mail: Incoming messages problem.
Hiya, Since around October my Apple Mail has been playing up, when I open Apple mail and click get mail it shows it downloading my mail it gets to around 17/310 message and then the download slowly decreases to 0kb and by the 22nd message it stops do