Higher than normal cpu for fed (PunjectRx) process

I noticed on my 3850 that the CPU seems to have gone up overnight a fed days ago and has stayed there. Everything seems to be fine at the moment but I was just wondering what the process is that's causing it (google gives me nothing) and if I should be worried.
Running show processes cpu sorted gives me this:
Core 0: CPU utilization for five seconds: 15%; one minute: 18%; five minutes: 25%
Core 1: CPU utilization for five seconds: 97%; one minute: 45%; five minutes: 34%
Core 2: CPU utilization for five seconds: 15%; one minute: 51%; five minutes: 39%
Core 3: CPU utilization for five seconds: 10%; one minute: 20%; five minutes: 42%
PID    Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec     1Min     5Min     TTY   Process
5711   183846      14637156 217    27.84    27.34    27.31    1088 fed
10184 481691      20810070 573    5.20     5.37     6.54     34816 iosd
I asked for detailed info on the fed process and got the output below. As you'll notice, the high cpu value on the core doesn't always show up on the same core. What is that PunjectRx process that's responsible for the higher than normal value do?
Core 0: CPU utilization for five seconds: 20%; one minute: 27%; five minutes: 30%
Core 1: CPU utilization for five seconds: 18%; one minute: 24%; five minutes: 28%
Core 2: CPU utilization for five seconds: 8%; one minute: 25%; five minutes: 34%
Core 3: CPU utilization for five seconds: 92%; one minute: 70%; five minutes: 52%
PID     T C TID     Runtime(ms) Invoked   uSecs 5Sec   1Min 5Min TTY   Process
5711    L            18656       146354252 217    26.9   27.2 27.3 1088 fed
5711    L 3 5711    29060       7853      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 1088 fed
5711    L 0 6144    2809206     23626670 0      0.00   0.01 0.02 1088 fed
5711    L 1 6145    5570        313407    0      0.00   0.00 0.00 1088 fed
5711    L 0 6146    296459      269367770 0      0.00   0.05 0.05 1088 CMI default xdm
5711    L 0 6147    3270        209596    0      0.00   0.00 0.00 1088 fed
5711    L 1 6150    2014171     254472866 0      0.34   0.30 0.29 0     fed-ots-main
5711    L 2 6151    600         13111     0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     fed-ots-mo
5711    L 2 6153    3715892     3065842   0      0.48   0.48 0.48 0     fed-ots-nfl
5711    L 0 6154    326140      18702233 0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     fed
5711    L 0 6155    137920      3126591   0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     pdslib thread
5711    L 0 6156    1820820     117290277 0      0.00   0.02 0.02 0     Timer
5711    L 2 6157    0           2805      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     fed
5711    L 0 6176    290660      152790809 0      0.72   0.77 0.73 0     IntrDrv
5711    L 0 6179    486230      31194756 0      0.00   0.02 0.01 0     LED
5711    L 0 10160   60          9427      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     Xcvr
5711    L 0 10162   233781      204227456 0      0.24   0.24 0.24 0     Xcvr
5711    L 2 10686   50780       1309757   0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     PdsEvent
5711    L 3 10687   2302060     113878739 0      24.0   24.0 24.0 0     PunjectRx
5711    L 2 10688   2689529     198752351 0      1.15   1.34 1.39 0     PunjectTx
5711    L 3 10689   0           7522      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     Consistency
5711    L 2 10690   0           7522      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     ShFwd
5711    L 0 10692   0           7544      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     eicore_bdn
5711    L 0 10693   0           7544      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     eicore_bdn
5711    L 0 10694   0           7544      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     eicore_bdn
5711    L 0 10696   50          7599      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     eicore_ipc
5711    L 3 10717   0           7752      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     fed
5711    L 0 10952   0           7849      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     fed
5711    L 0 11072   4281230     128013576 0      0.00   0.01 0.02 0     XcvrPoll

Seeing similar here on 3850 stack. Running 03.03.01SE IOS-XE.
Core 0: CPU utilization for five seconds: 45%; one minute: 40%; five minutes: 39%
Core 1: CPU utilization for five seconds: 57%; one minute: 46%; five minutes: 45%
Core 2: CPU utilization for five seconds: 58%; one minute: 57%; five minutes: 54%
Core 3: CPU utilization for five seconds: 39%; one minute: 56%; five minutes: 56%
PID     T C TID     Runtime(ms) Invoked   uSecs 5Sec   1Min 5Min TTY   Process
5679    L            2207615     162418091 66     23.7   23.1 22.7 1088 fed
5679    L 2 5679    29940       7879      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 1088 fed
5679    L 0 6112    321780      319764    0      0.00   0.03 0.04 1088 fed
5679    L 2 6113    520         24080     0      0.00   0.00 0.00 1088 fed
5679    L 2 6114    8770        5395188   0      0.00   0.03 0.04 0     CMI default xdm
5679    L 1 6115    320         16534     0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     fed
5679    L 2 6118    1130370     5020432   0      0.62   0.74 0.74 0     fed-ots-main
5679    L 1 6119    20          1303      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     fed-ots-mo
5679    L 2 6121    3855140     224587    0      0.52   0.49 0.48 0     fed-ots-nfl
5679    L 1 6122    23500       1399239   0      0.00   0.04 0.01 0     fed
5679    L 2 6123    11430       231772    0      0.00   0.01 0.03 0     pdslib thread
5679    L 1 6124    189270      9882134   0      0.05   0.04 0.04 0     Timer
5679    L 1 6125    0           2808      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     fed
5679    L 1 6144    793970      8150598   0      0.29   0.21 0.20 0     IntrDrv
5679    L 1 6147    33730       2295636   0      0.00   0.01 0.00 0     LED
5679    L 0 10452   40          9474      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     Xcvr
5679    L 1 10456   1922330     107887089 0      0.33   0.22 0.20 0     Xcvr
5679    L 3 12275   110         10697     0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     PdsEvent
5679    L 2 12276   980070      7963687   0      0.71   0.49 0.48 0     PunjectRx
5679    L 0 12277   1263190     4878455   0      21.1   20.8 20.5 0     PunjectTx
5679    L 0 12278   0           7567      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     Consistency
5679    L 0 12279   0           7567      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     ShFwd
5679    L 1 12283   0           7580      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     eicore_bdn
5679    L 1 12284   0           7580      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     eicore_bdn
5679    L 1 12285   0           7579      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     eicore_bdn
5679    L 3 12289   10          7608      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     eicore_ipc
5679    L 0 12298   0           7788      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     fed
5679    L 2 12610   0           7875      0      0.00   0.00 0.00 0     fed
5679    L 2 12801   233040      8635591   0      0.05   0.02 0.03 0     XcvrPoll

Similar Messages

Track levels suddenly much higher than normal. ?!?!?

Need some help friends... I have a problem that I can't seem to fix;
When I boot up an existing song or project, the levels shown on most of my tracks are peaking but the sound isn't clipping. The faders were all well below zero normally but for some reason now the levels are much higher and in the red. Why? The whole song sounds the same as far as I can tell but the levels shown on the faders are all much, much higher! The only way to reduce them is to remove the compression and other plugins from the track but I need a way to just restore the original levels...
Many thanks in advance for any suggestions,
If you need any info - please ask - i really want to sort this out asap.
Acoma

So how come BeeJay gets a "Helpful" and I do not when I am the one who correctly diagnosed the problem? Sheesh!
That's 'cos I'm much prettier than you!
Er, no, wait... the other thing...
(In any case, when I saw the original question, I left it for you to answer as you are the chief PFM-advocate around here... )

Case temp higher than cpu?

I'm on my second board now. I sent my first one back because I couldn't get USB working.
I initially had problems with my replacement board. My onboard LAN wouldn't work with win2k even after all the patches and driver updates. I fixed it by installing winXP. Now everything is finally working as it should except for my temps.
For some reason my system temps are always higher than my CPU temps. Is this right?
On speed fan I have the following:
CPU temps @ 27-35c
Case temps @ 38-47c
I even checked my temps on my motherboard bios and they say the same thing. My first board had the same problem. Did I plug something in wrong or am I going crazy?
My CPU has a retail Intel HSF and I used Arctic Silver 5 thermal compound
My case has the following:
2 80mm intake fans on my front panel,
1 80mm intake fan on my side panel (right on top of the HSF)
1 80mm exhaust fan at the top (blowhole)
1 120mm exhaust fan at the rear.

from idle, which temps increase the fastest when running something like prime95? whichever one it is, would be the cpu temp.. you can do this test to see which is the cpu reading and which is the mobo/system reading.. better yet, take the side panel off so that you know the system reading will not change so quickly.
thats how i configured speedfan when i first got this board. but now there is a good guide here for setting it up with the right thermal probes etc etc.
my temps... well the rig is continuously setiing (well, while its on anyways, the highest ive seen it go is roughly 46degrees - cpu and 32 degrees - system).
ive got 1 120mm @ 7v as a front intake,
and errm thats basically it! haha theres 3 fans on the psu and yeah, not a hell of a lot more. the cables are neatly tucked away as muhc as possible to not hinder the airflow. im thinking of putting in 1 side intake - but probbaly not yet. wait till uni is over..

The bottom list of apps on my ipod touch screen is way higher than its suppose to be

hi i have an ipod touch 2nd generation i dont update it to often cause i have very very slow iternet and it can take up to 4 hours and i dont have the time to update it but the bottom list of apps i dont know what its called but i think its the app bar is way higher than normal i dont know why the only app i really use is pandora i dont know if that helps

HI,
Try a Reset of your Device... You will not lose any data
Turn iPod touch off and turn it on again.
Press and hold the Sleep/Wake button on top of iPod touch for a few seconds until a red slider appears, and then slide the slider.
Then press and hold the Sleep/Wake button until the Apple logo appears.
From Here http://support.apple.com/kb/ts2771

I received my new Verizon Edge bill in the mail and it is $80 higher than my old plan. I have been so unhappy with this change over. Went through hell getting our second phone activated because of a weird computer glitch and when we asked if we would re

I received my new Verizon Edge bill in the mail and it is $80 higher than my old plan. I have been so unhappy with this change over. Went through hell getting our second phone activated because of a weird computer glitch and when we asked if we would receive any consideration for the time, travel, and money we put into getting the phones the way they were supposed to be, we were told to wait until the bill came and then they could make adjustments. Now I have the bill and have no idea "who" the we would be that could make adjustments. To top it off, the only way I know my account will get any attention is to post this in chat. I am so disappointed and will be counting the months until our phones are paid off and we can change companies.

Call 800-922-0204
I just purchased a new device using Verizon Edge. Why does my bill look higher than normal?
There’s two reasons why your first bill after signing up for Edge might be higher than normal:
Prorate Charges – If you upgraded an existing line and did a price plan change, you may have price plan charges and credits that went into effect the day you upgraded.
Sales Tax – Most states require sales tax on the full retail price paid by the customer, which in most instances will be charged at the time of the first invoice.
Note: Customers who purchased devices in AL, AZ, CO, IL, NM, ND or SD will be billed taxes and surcharges monthly as payments are made.
Your bill will normally include:
Your last Edge installment payment
The next Edge installment charge
If you are on a MORE Everything Plan, a monthly access discount for each qualifying line.
The details of Edge installments and discounts can be viewed at the line level portion of your bill under Monthly Charges and Equipment Charges, or in My Verizon, My Bill then Charges By Line.

B3 bios reports cpu temp 10c higher than b5 bios on k7n2 plat

Dear list,
b3 bios reports cpu temp 10c higher than b5 bios on k7n2 plat after reading posts that b3 is more stable changed back to that so far so good, seems more stable its just that cpu temp was 45-50 c on b5 bios but on b3 in the bios is says 60 c and in core center it now says 40c but was 70c before I re booted very odd indeed, its stable but soemtimes doesn't shutdown have to turn off but thats probely a widnows probelm somewhere.
cheers
brummie
ps do I need to clear cmos when I have put new bios in or will it doit as part of the process ??

dear os navi,
yep
http://www.thermaltake.com/coolers/volcano/rs/a1889.htm
I got this one with a heat duct on it. yes its all seated well and clean, just downloaded a corecenter update, cleared the cmos and started again. I am now getting 44 c for the temp now. What the bios says I dont know, could be that I hadnt cleared the bios that the temp was reading wrong.
cheers
brummie

Table creation Error "Ref Count for this object is higher than 0"

Hi All
I have a problem in creation of table using SDK on a button event. I have a procedure to create tables and fields. If I call this procedure on a menu Event than it works fine but If I call this procedure on a button event than It gives error "Ref count for this object is higher than 0" . I know this error occur When an object does not release after creating a table. but this error occur at when first table is created. My code it given below. plz see and give me your valuable suggestions.
Dim oUserTablesMD As SAPbobsCOM.UserTablesMD
            Try
                oUserTablesMD = B1Connections.diCompany.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oUserTables)
                oUserTablesMD.TableName = "AM_OBIN"
                oUserTablesMD.TableDescription = "PutAway Table"
                oUserTablesMD.TableType = BoUTBTableType.bott_Document
                lRetCode = oUserTablesMD.Add
                '// check for errors in the process
                If lRetCode <> 0 Then
                    B1Connections.diCompany.GetLastError(lRetCode, sErrMsg)
                    MsgBox(sErrMsg)
                Else
                    B1Connections.theAppl.StatusBar.SetText("Table: " & oUserTablesMD.TableName & " was added successfully", BoMessageTime.bmt_Short, BoStatusBarMessageType.smt_Success)
                End If
                System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ReleaseComObject(oUserTablesMD)
                oUserTablesMD = Nothing
                GC.Collect()
                oUserTablesMD = B1Connections.diCompany.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oUserTables)
                oUserTablesMD.TableName = "AM_BIN1"
                oUserTablesMD.TableDescription = "PutAway Upper Grid"
                oUserTablesMD.TableType = BoUTBTableType.bott_DocumentLines
                lRetCode = oUserTablesMD.Add
                '// check for errors in the process
                If lRetCode <> 0 Then
                    If lRetCode = -1 Then
                    Else
                        B1Connections.diCompany.GetLastError(lRetCode, sErrMsg)
                        MsgBox(sErrMsg)
                    End If
                Else
                    B1Connections.theAppl.StatusBar.SetText("Table: " & oUserTablesMD.TableName & " was added successfully", BoMessageTime.bmt_Short, BoStatusBarMessageType.smt_Success)
                End If
                System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ReleaseComObject(oUserTablesMD)
                oUserTablesMD = Nothing
                GC.Collect()
            Catch ex As Exception
                MsgBox(ex.Message)
            End Try
Thanks
Regards
Gorge

Hi Gorge,
The "Ref count error..." usually occurs in case of Meta Data objects not being properly cleared. And yes, you have got the error in the right place, generally while creating tables / fields / UDOs. For this, you just need to clear the Meta Data object (At times even DI objects like Record Set) once they are used.
Eg: Release these objects in the below way in a Finally Block.
System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ReleaseComObject(oRecordSet);
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Satish

WSUS throwing 13002, "Client computers are installing updates with a higher than 25 percent failure rate. This is not normal."

Hello,
Within the past two months our WSUS Server started throwing error 13002, "Client computers are installing updates with a higher than 25 percent failure rate. This is not normal." We currently have 252 computers with errors in WSUS,
and 33 updates with errors. We have never had issues up until two months ago. If you keep rebooting the machine, and keep running updates, they eventually all install. I believe I will see the machines with errors go away as the weekly scheduled
WSUS install runs over and over, and the machines reboot.
- We run IE8 in our environment and sometimes IE9.
- We have 300 clients, all running Windows 7 SP1 x64.
- Our WSUS server is running on Server 2008 R2. The WSUS build number is 3.2.7600.262.
- We created an alternate WSUS 4.0 server on Server 2012, and redownloaded all updates. We put one client on it and it is showing errors on 3 updates, KB890830, KB931125, and KB2917500.
- Clients are throwing errors 800F0902, 80242016, and 80070005.
- I've noticed something with the C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download folder on the clients. When an update runs and fails, there is a "Install" folder created inside this folder. If you try to open it after the failure you get
"Access Denied" If you reboot the machine, the install folder goes away. (I assume this is a temp folder created to run updates). I've checked the permissions on this folder on various machines and all seems normal. I think
this is the root of the problem, and why we need to keep rebooting to get all of the updates to run.
- I tried deleting the Software Distribution folder on a client after stopping the update service, then restarting the update service. The folder redownloads but the client still throws errors.
- I've gone through our Group Policies looking for anything that can cause this and found nothing. We've created a test OU blocking inheritance, and only applying a WSUS policy in it to make it get the updates internally. I then rebuilt multiple
machines using Dell KACE, and still had failures.
- We run SEP 11 and 12 on our clients. I've tried removing the AV, making sure the firewall was off, etc. It still throws errors.
- I've spoken with our network team, and installed wireshark on a few clients looking for network errors and found nothing.
- I've tried various Dell KACE scripted installs on test machines (erasing and rebuilding the machines from scratch), after which I run Windows Updates from WSUS. They have thrown errors.
- I've rebuilt a machine using Dell KACE, undomained it, then ran updates externally from WSUS going to Microsoft's site, and I'm still getting errors.
- I've tried removing all software from the Dell KACE build to where it is just installing the OS and I'm still getting errors.
- I tried taking a plain Windows 7 x64 DVD and installing that on a test machine, then without domaining it and without installing any other software, running updates from Microsofts update site. This seems to work, althrough it does throw some errors
but I believe those are related to having to reboot your machine in order to complete the updates (I can't remember that error code at the moment).
Has anyone else been experiencing this? Any suggestions as to how I can fix this?

Hi,
Error 800f0902
Please try the method in this thread:
Error
Code: 800f0902
Error 80242016
If you receive Windows Update error 80242016 while checking for updates, it might be caused by a connection interruption between your computer and the Windows Update servers.
80070005
Usually means access denied
Since it worked perfectly for a while, did you make any change on the server? Any applications new installed on clients?

Is it normal if it takes more than 5 hrs to download and process ios 5 and backup in itunes (syncing)

is it normal if it takes more than 5 hrs to download and process ios 5 and backup in itunes (syncing)

Hi Thaimic,
Thanks for your reply.
IP Adddress: 192.168.0.101
Subnetmask: 255.255.255.0
Router: 192.168.0.7
DNS: 180.168.255.118, 192.168.1.1
These are my WLAN details.under DHCP and BootP. Could you please tell me what to do with the DNS ? I do not have idea about the DNS.

3750 stack - high cpu for "hulc running con" every one or two minutes

I have a stack of 4 x 3750 :
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image
* 1 28 WS-C3750G-24PS 12.2(53)SE C3750-IPSERVICES-M
2 12 WS-C3750G-12S 12.2(53)SE C3750-IPSERVICES-M
3 12 WS-C3750G-12S 12.2(53)SE C3750-IPSERVICES-M
4 28 WS-C3750G-24PS 12.2(53)SE C3750-IPSERVICES-M
And every minutes or two minutes (approximately), I have high cpu for "hulc running con" without doing anything.
coeur#sh proc cpu sort
CPU utilization for five seconds: 86%/28%; one minute: 49%; five minutes: 49%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
312 670849714 3362057 199535 44.22% 5.00% 4.96% 0 hulc running con
82 234351581 353049778 663 3.76% 5.99% 5.95% 0 HLFM address lea
277 11138 8537 1304 1.05% 1.70% 1.12% 1 Virtual Exec
142 10589757 353659360 29 0.90% 0.33% 0.22% 0 Hulc LED Process
coeur#sh proc cpu sort
CPU utilization for five seconds: 95%/27%; one minute: 52%; five minutes: 49%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
312 670832227 3361981 199545 55.59% 8.95% 5.76% 0 hulc running con
82 234334259 353043921 663 3.99% 5.78% 6.02% 0 HLFM address lea
277 6286 7531 834 0.63% 1.06% 0.61% 1 Virtual Exec
106 15342490 19948859 769 0.47% 0.20% 0.15% 0 hpm counter proc
119 2034091 13865800 146 0.31% 0.04% 0.03% 0 LLDP Protocol
142 10588906 353653113 29 0.31% 0.21% 0.16% 0 Hulc LED Process
How can I find which is doing a "show run" ? Which debug can I do ?
Thanks

We solved our problem it was caused because we were routing in and out the same L3 interface.
Fixed this issue and our CPU dropped dramatically.

Another one with much higher BB usage than normal

Hi,
This is probably going to sound familiar to lots of people, but we also are recording much higher BB usage than normal. We are only on the 10gb package, as our max 512kb broadband doesn't make it worthwhile trying to do much with the www.
Our usage is usually pretty close to the 10gb, and in fact we have probably gone over it 3 or 4 times in the last 2 years (I work away a lot, so Skype gets hammered, which I know could be up to about 350mb/hour). Our average usage has been 9.87gb according to BT. I was home at the end of June, and decided to reactivate BT FON, and my wife and I also installed the Smarttalk app. Now, halfway through July, we are already up at over 7gb used.
The warning e-mail for 6gb used was last night, the usage monitor is already showing over 7gb - that is a heck of a lot of broadband usage for a property with such a slow connection. I have tried tackling BT in the past, and got absolutely nowhere, being told that although they could give me details of the previous weeks usage, they couldn't go back any further because that informaton was unavailable - unsatisfactory response, but that was all I could get.
Obviously BT are saying we could always go unlimited, but I'd rather find out what the issue is and why this sudden increase - we aren't using that much internet.
Iain

Iain_L wrote:
Hi,
This is probably going to sound familiar to lots of people, but we also are recording much higher BB usage than normal. We are only on the 10gb package, as our max 512kb broadband doesn't make it worthwhile trying to do much with the www.
Our usage is usually pretty close to the 10gb, and in fact we have probably gone over it 3 or 4 times in the last 2 years (I work away a lot, so Skype gets hammered, which I know could be up to about 350mb/hour). Our average usage has been 9.87gb according to BT. I was home at the end of June, and decided to reactivate BT FON, and my wife and I also installed the Smarttalk app. Now, halfway through July, we are already up at over 7gb used.
The warning e-mail for 6gb used was last night, the usage monitor is already showing over 7gb - that is a heck of a lot of broadband usage for a property with such a slow connection. I have tried tackling BT in the past, and got absolutely nowhere, being told that although they could give me details of the previous weeks usage, they couldn't go back any further because that informaton was unavailable - unsatisfactory response, but that was all I could get.
Obviously BT are saying we could always go unlimited, but I'd rather find out what the issue is and why this sudden increase - we aren't using that much internet.
Iain
Got the same problem, see my seperate Post.
Don't wish to hi-jack your post but how can BT be tackeled?
It's hard to keep a daily check, I would say impossible!

Limiting cpu for a process

Hi,
I see this type of question has been asked before - but there doesn't seem to be an answer.
I want to limit how much (as a percentage of CPU) a process can use.
I'm not talking about NICE or RENICE as this only lowers priority in relation to other processes, I want a process to run and never use more than 30% CPU.
The reason is I have Rosetta Stone language software, and when waiting for input (via Macromedia) it uses 100% CPU. After initial arguing with the vendor - who tried to blame my setup/machine etc - they admitted it was a known issue with their software on the Mac.
I like the software, but 100% CPU kicks the fan on quickly which annoys me intensely- and is generally "not good".
I also have the same issue with Epson scan software - 100% CPU when it's doing nothing.
I'm genuinely surprised there's nothing to limit a process.

You mean like a RAM check? Passed with flying colors. I also have a new harddrive. Still the same problems. I don't think I can check anything else. Is there RAM onboard the motherboard?
Do you think a mac store test if it has overheating problems?

How to know which process is consuming high percentage of cpu?

Hi,
How to check which process is consuming high percentage of cpu ?
how to know the cpu time is atleast 80% of the elapsed time and how to know which code the process is running?
I know we can check high performance cpu can be find by TOP command
but i dont know on solaris?
please help me on this?

One way is to use my Snapper script for getting the breakdown ( see http://blog.tanelpoder.com/2007/12/06/oracle-session-snapper-v106-released/ for more info ).
An example snapshot (taken over 60 second period) is below:
SQL> @snapper out,gather=tw 60 1 "select sid from v$session where type = 'USER'"
-- Session Snapper v1.07 by Tanel Poder ( http://www.tanelpoder.com )
HEAD, SID, SNAPSHOT START , SECONDS, TYPE, STATISTIC , DELTA, DELTA/SEC, HDELTA, HDELTA/SEC
DATA, 2, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, TIME, repeated bind elapsed time , 1314, 22, 1.31ms, 21.54us
DATA, 2, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, TIME, parse time elapsed , 21518, 353, 21.52ms, 352.75us
DATA, 2, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, TIME, PL/SQL execution elapsed time , 809888, 13277, 809.89ms, 13.28ms
DATA, 2, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, TIME, DB CPU , 11204956, 183688, 11.2s, 183.69ms
DATA, 2, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, TIME, sql execute elapsed time , 12441308, 203956, 12.44s, 203.96ms
DATA, 2, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, TIME, DB time , 13825800, 226652, 13.83s, 226.65ms
DATA, 2, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, WAIT, read by other session , 4432, 73, 4.43ms, 72.66us
DATA, 2, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, WAIT, log file sync , 1215135, 19920, 1.22s, 19.92ms
DATA, 2, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, WAIT, db file sequential read , 1458168, 23904, 1.46s, 23.9ms
DATA, 2, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, WAIT, enq: TX - row lock contention , 11600, 190, 11.6ms, 190.16us
DATA, 2, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, WAIT, row cache lock , 420, 7, 420us, 6.89us
DATA, 2, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, WAIT, SQL*Net message to client , 1842, 30, 1.84ms, 30.2us
DATA, 2, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, WAIT, SQL*Net message from client , 9490531, 155582, 9.49s, 155.58ms
DATA, 2, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, WAIT, PL/SQL lock timer , 35759582, 586223, 35.76s, 586.22ms
DATA, 2, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, WAIT, events in waitclass Other , 302, 5, 302us, 4.95us
DATA, 20, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, TIME, repeated bind elapsed time , 1332, 22, 1.33ms, 21.84us
DATA, 20, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, TIME, parse time elapsed , 21439, 351, 21.44ms, 351.46us
DATA, 20, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, TIME, PL/SQL execution elapsed time , 799773, 13111, 799.77ms, 13.11ms
DATA, 20, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, TIME, DB CPU , 11303744, 185307, 11.3s, 185.31ms
DATA, 20, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, TIME, sql execute elapsed time , 12404247, 203348, 12.4s, 203.35ms
DATA, 20, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, TIME, DB time , 13792389, 226105, 13.79s, 226.1ms
DATA, 20, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, TIME, sequence load elapsed time , 752, 12, 752us, 12.33us
DATA, 20, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, WAIT, log file sync , 1228759, 20144, 1.23s, 20.14ms
DATA, 20, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, WAIT, db file sequential read , 1339772, 21963, 1.34s, 21.96ms
DATA, 20, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, WAIT, row cache lock , 395, 6, 395us, 6.48us
DATA, 20, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, WAIT, SQL*Net message to client , 1901, 31, 1.9ms, 31.16us
DATA, 20, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, WAIT, SQL*Net message from client , 9496607, 155682, 9.5s, 155.68ms
DATA, 20, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, WAIT, PL/SQL lock timer , 35786481, 586664, 35.79s, 586.66ms
DATA, 20, 20080710 11:39:18, 61, WAIT, events in waitclass Other , 96, 2, 96us, 1.57us
Tanel Poder
http://blog.tanelpoder.com

Power on MacBook Pro takes me to login screen. All user icons appear as normal. Once I enter password for myself (administrator) spinning takes longer than normal and doesn't log in but displays a no sign

Power on MacBook Pro takes me to login screen. All user icons appear as normal. Once I enter password for myself (administrator) spinning takes longer than normal and doesn't log in but displays a no sign (circle w line through it) when attempting to login from guest account it takes me to screen that says that the computer will restart to a safe safari system for the guest user. I waited for a longer time and the grey denim screen comes up. By the apple in left upper corner it said I think LSA? Then safari menu bar. The page it loads to us file:///System/Installation/CDIS/Mac%2005%20X%20Utilities.app/Contents/Resource s/English.iproj/GuestLoginInfirmation.html
Can someone HELP? I'm afraid I might do something wrong

What backups do you have?

Hi i insttalled the free trial 3O days MacScan on OsX10.5 is it normal that for full scaning it takes so long time more even than one day?! on the other hand this application hasn't any uninstaller on image disc ,so how can i uninstal it from my hard?

Hi i insttalled the free trial 3O days MacScan on OsX10.5 is it normal that for full scaning it takes so long time more even than one day?! on the other hand this application hasn't any uninstaller on image disc ,so how can i uninstal it from my hard?Thanks

Get rid of the tracking cookies. They are used to profile and track your browsing history. While they are privacy invading, by calling them spyware, MacScan is being a little dramatic in trying to sell you its crap. And in the future, for whatever browser you use, don't allow third-party cookies.
To prevent tracking, get Ghostery. In addition to having Ghostery and forbidding third-party cookies, I clear out all cookies from one browsing session to another. If you always do that, you won't have any tracking cookies to worry about, so you won't need MacScan to find them for you. Btw, MacScan finds the tracking cookies in the first few minutes of scanning; if you want to use it for that, then that's all the time you need to run it for. But, as I said, you won't have any tracking cookies around if you just remove all cookies and don't allow third-party cookies. As soon as you visit a site that needs them, you'll just get new ones. No problem.
Read all about cookies here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_cookie

Higher than normal cpu for fed (PunjectRx) process

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for