HIT for RHEL 7

When is support comming for RHEL 7 based installations ? We are getting ready to turn up a RHEL 7 based datacenter and we can't seem to find a HIT for Equallogic

you made me smile. el 7.1 is right in front of the door, and still no sign of dells great hit kit. if you think, how long it took dell in the past to update the hitkit for example from el 6.4 to 6.5 ... 6+ months. dunno if theres a version for the latest el6 yet, somehow i feel like heres none for sure.
equallogic linux support is a very special story... i little bit overdone but...: nearly every el cheapo iscsi san is better in that term. or simply doesnt need a a special driver.
for me, i am done with equallogic after 4 years with several different arrays (61xx, 4xxx - 1G / 10G - SSD only). only trouble, buggy firmwares, unbelievible release times for hit kits.
expect a sales guy who tries to sell you enterprise storage contacting you ;) compellent.
cheers,

Similar Messages

I got my 27" Mac on 10/06/13...can I, or rather shouldn't I, get the iwork suite for free? 2 weeks is a hard hit for $60 in apps after spending $1800.

I got my 27" Mac on 10/06/13...can I, or rather shouldn't I, get the iwork suite for free? 2 weeks is a hard hit for $60 in apps after spending $1800. The store told me that Mavericks was guarenteed for 6 months. So when I bought it early, (knowing that Mavericks was coming), I had no fears. But to watch the keynote today, and come home and see the cost is a bit of a sour Apple.

Are you trying to install a 32 bit or 64 bit version of Windows 8?
Which versions of Windows are supported with Boot Camp 5?
64-bit versions of Windows 8 and Windows 7 are supported using the Boot Camp 5 Support Software. If you need to use a 32-bit version, you need to use Boot Camp 4 Support Software, and you must use Windows 7. 32-bit versions of Windows 8 are not supported via Boot Camp.
You can get more info on BootCamp here:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5628

Where can I find oracle 9i download for RHEL 5.6?

Hello all,
do you know where can I find oracle 9i download for RHEL 5.6? I can't find it anywhere.
Thanks in advance.

024c8465-a0ba-4c31-8631-545e52a60961 wrote:
Hello all,
do you know where can I find oracle 9i download for RHEL 5.6? I can't find it anywhere.
Thanks in advance.
My Oracle Support ... and only if you have a paid-up support contract. Actually, I'm not sure 9i would be available even then. 10g is only available to those with a paid-up sustaining support contract. 9i is so old (hasn't been supported in this millennium) I wouldn't be surprised it is not available at any price. Further, I doubt it was ever certified for RHEL 5. Hard to tell since the documentation isn't even available .....
Just out of curiosity, why would you be needing such an antique?
On another note, please edit your profile to give yourself a recognizable name.

Oracle 9.2.0.6 support for RHEL 4 AS update 4

Hi All,
Where can i get information on the support matrix for oracle 9.2.0.6 for Red hat Enterprise Linux 4 Advanced server update 4. The document at http://www.oracle.com/technology/support/metalink/index.html does not give information on the 'update' versions (update 3, update 4 etc). Please advise.
Regards,
Kishore

You must have the minimum update specified by oracle for any OS and as long as you stay on same release, it is supported. Oracle doesn't provide support info at different update levels instead it specify the minimum update which is required for you to have the support.
Check the minimum update requirement for RHEL 4 and if you are on that or above that, you are fine.
Daljit Singh

I am trying to buy on itunes the top 30 hits for 1959. anyone know the name of the cd i am searching for?

is there available on itunes a compilation of the top 30 hits for 1959?

Queen of Hearts, I just looked in the iTunes USA store and did not see such a compilation. You can always the web for a list of the top songs of 1959, and then buy the ones you want singly.

Download Oracle Forms 3.0 for RHEL 4

Hi,
I want looking to download Oracle From 3.0 for RHEL 4.0... We have a legacy application built on Forms 3.0 character based and database 9i. We dont have the installation media for the same..
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Regards
Kabir

907639 wrote:
We dont have the license for the Oracle Forms 3i... Is there a way we can still open an SR with Oracle with another Database License or License of any other Product from Oracle???Sure.
Have your corporate credit card ready when you begin the process of opening the SR.
Oracle will be happy to take your money for providing the service.
Is there no Archive on the net from where I can download this Media???
No. Old products are gone from public acccess.

RG1 hitting for Storage Location

All SAP Gurus,
How we can activate RG1 hitting for perticular Storage Location?
Regards,

Dear Rajan
In my opinion, we do not actually do any setting for this.
When we assign movt. type, then at the time of GR / GI for that movt.type, RG1 is to be updated.
In J1I5, we enter Material Doc. created during GR / GI and assign specific classification for RG1 updation.
Thus storage location where Goods Receipt is done will only be considered & entered in this transaction.
Hope this helps u.

Zero hit for caching on content engine, why?

"show statistics http savings" reveals there's zero (0) hit for web requests.
"show statistics http miss-reason"
indicates most of them was due to "none_get_method".
Now, what does that mean, and how can I increase the hits?
We're using the exact same rules as all the other sites (which have hits), except we're redirecting traffic on the ingress interface instead of egress:
int g0/0.1
ip wccp web-cache redirect in
Any ideas please share.
thanks.

Hi,
There are many reasons why a CE is not caching content, I'll try to list some of the things you may check:
- Make sure that the router is indeed redirecting traffic to the CE, use this command on the router: sh ip wccp web-cache detail. Make sure that the redirect line is constantly increasing.
- Make sure that the CE has a CFS partition configured, use this output on the CE to check: sh disk details. Look for the CFS partition and make sure it has some space allocated. If you need to partition the disk, use this command: 'disk config sysfs 5% cfs 50% mediafs 30% cdnfs remaining'.
- Add this command to the CE: http cache-cookies. This would greatly increase the amount of content that would be cached by the CE.
- Another thing that needs to be considered is the web site you are going to. Remember that dynamic content would not be cached by the CE.
Check these points and if you continue having issues, add a sh tech from the CE for review and a tcpdump taken at the CE using this command: '#tcpdump -s 1500 -w dump.cap'. Get the file 'dump.cap' off the CE.
Let me know how it goes. Thanks!
Regards,
Jose Quesada.

ASM Lib files for RHEL-2.6.32-71.el6.x86-64

Guys, We have RHEL 2.6.32-71 kernel on production setup. I need to install Oracle RAC with ASM but i am not finding any supporting ASM Lib RPM for RHEL.
Please let me know whether i should go for Oracle Linux.
Thanks in Advance.
Yuvrajsinh Chauhan

may be you got answer here
Your question answer is here J
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/linux/asmlib/ol6-1709075.html
you have two option for download that rpm
ULN(https://linux.oracle.com/ )
Or
http://public-yum.oracle.com/

Speed Hit for dissimilar RAM

I just bought a MacBook (it hasn't arrived yet) and I will be replacing one of the 256MB chips with a 1GB chip. I understand from the Apple tech specs that there will be some kind of speed hit for not having a matched pair of RAM chips so my question is:
Should I just yank both the 256MB chips and put in the 1GB chip alone or should I go with the 1 gig chip and the 256 chip together? An aside: will the video performance be better with the 2 dissimilar chips or the one 1GB chip?

Only the Macbook and the Mac mini use the Intel
integrated video. The Macbook Pros and the iMac use
discrete video so they don't share system RAM. Dual
channel mode would net no performance difference.
You'll notice that the Macbook and Mac mini are the
only two machines that require you to configure a
machine with both Dimms.
Good point about the MacBook and Mini performance increase with matched pairs because of the shared memory for video, but I not so sure about your statement that the MacBook Pro would see no performance increase with matched pairs.
Apple recommends installing RAM in matched pairs for the MBP:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=303553
Additionally, Barefeats saw an improvement when using matched pairs:
"April 20th, 2006 -- Matched Memory Pairs make your Intel Mac Faster. Some of you were asking whether you would gain any speed using matched memory pairs on your Macbook Pro, Intel Mac or Intel mini. In our testing, iMovie renders were 3% faster with matched pairs. Our Photoshop CS2 MP actions ran 6% faster with matched pairs."
http://www.barefeats.com/quick.html
Note that iMovie isn't MP aware and Photoshop CS2 runs via Rosetta. I don't believe these are the best applications to test the advantages of dual-channel RAM.
While it's possible for memory installed in a single channel configuration to saturate the 64-bit CPU bus on the MBP, I believe (correct me if I'm wrong here) enabling dual-channel memory allows data to travel in both directions simultaneously. This can be advantageous when multiple applications wish to access memory at the same time. I'd expect to see the greatest improvements when running Universal Binaries of Pro apps.
In short, you can certainly get away with using unmatched pairs on your MBP, but if you're a power user and you want to extract the maximum performance, matched pairs are recommended.
20-inch iMac G5 1.8; MacBook Pro 1.83 Mac OS X (10.4.6)

ASM rpm for RHEL 3.0

hi
does anyone know where can i get hold of the oracleasm rpm for RHEL 3.0 ??? the version available on otn is for RHEL 2.1. Any idea when it might be out
thanks
harshad

Hi,
Last time I checked the ENT 3.x ver was on hold....Regards, --jh

How to install Oracle 10g Release 2 (10.2) for RHEL 5

Hello Guys,
I want to install Oracle® Database 10g Release 2 (10.2) for Linux x86-64 in RHEL 5
Please experience people guide me ... please don't give me http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/install.102/b15667/toc.htm (Oracle® Database Installation Guide 10g Release 2 (10.2) for Linux x86-64) link i already gone through but it's to much in depth and not able to understand what is that i can use from this.
My Machine is having 12GB RAM and it's 64bit machine.
So please provide me steps that only relate to my oracle installation. I just want to do simple installation without database and my machine not have graphical interface also.
Send me your generic steps that i can run on my machine. if you want information about my system specification please ask.
So please people help me out... i am really thankful to you guys .....
Thanks ,
ORACLE DBA P

That also good idea man. thanks for your valuable advice.
I have confusion here ...
3. Changes to be made to Kernel parameters
After installing above mentioned packages, we need to change some Kernel parameters and make them match to Oracle requirements. Parameters which should be changed are shown below
shmmax     2147483648
shmmni     4096
shmall     2097152
shmmin     1
semmsl     250
semmns     32000
semopm     100
semmni     128
file-max     65536
ip_local_port_range     1024 65000
rmem_default     1048576
rmem_max     1048576
wmem_default     262144
wmem_max     262144
We do all these changes in the /etc/sysctl.conf file by adding these lines to that file:
kernel.shmmax = 2147483648
kernel.shmall = 2097152
kernel.shmmni=4096
kernel.sem=250 32000 100 128
fs.file-max=65536
net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range=1024 65000
net.core.rmem_default=1048576
net.core.rmem_max=1048576
net.core.wmem_default=262144
net.core.wmem_max=262144
Question: What will be my value for this as my system is 64bit so this all parameter is ok if i put all straight ?
----> Setting Shell limits for the Oracle UserTo improve the performance of the software on Linux systems, you must increase the following shell limits for the oracle user:
1. Add the following lines to /etc/security/limits.conf file
oracle soft nproc 2047
oracle hard nproc 16384
oracle soft nofile 1024
oracle hard nofile 65536
2. Add the following lines to /etc/pam.d/login file
session required /lib/security/pam_limits.so
session required pam_limits.so
3. In order to use Oracle Software, we need to make a change in “oracle” user’s buffer size and number of opened file descriptors. In order to do it, we add below lines to /etc/profile file
if [ $USER = "oracle" ]; then
if [ $SHELL = "/bin/ksh" ]; then
ulimit -p 16384
ulimit -n 65536
else
ulimit -u 16384 -n 65536
fi
fi
Question: this things also i need to change ?

What kind of hit for carrying balances [update 7/3]

I've been keeping my utilization way low, with most accounts reporting zero, and the others reporting nominally, so that my utilization has been about a third of a percent. This week I decided to get some postponed dental work done, and to pay for it with some zero-interest-rate cards and not worry so much about the FICO scores. And I'm considering letting the balances ride for awhile, not paying them off totally, and letting my reported balances go up to the neighborhood of 5% overall utilization, with the zero interest cards just under 30%. How much of a hit can I expect on my FICO scores if I do in fact let my utilization go from a third of a percent to five percent? Even if you tell me I can expect a bad hit, I might do it anyway, just as an experiment...My scores are of only academic interest at this point since I should be gardening at this stage of the game. But I do wonder what lies ahead. Updates: 5/17 Started May 16th with: 10 accounts at zero balance, 3 accounts posting total balance of $241, representing less than .3% overall utilization Over the next 5 days, I allowed 3 of the 13 revolving accounts to post a total of $1524.33, for 1.7% overall utilization, with individual account utilization ranging from 2.13% to 49%. 5/22 EX dropped 2 points. 5/29 Balances up to $2700, representing 3% overall. No other score changes yet. 6/3 The entire $2700 has been reported to TU, and my TU score has not budged. 6/5 As of today I'm up to $3500, for 3.9% overall utilization. My only FICO change so far has been -2 on EX. But both my FAKO scores at Credit Karma just dropped 5 points, which makes me nervous. So I will probably let it peak at 3.9% and start bringing the numbers down now. 6/8 Boom! EQ FICO dropped 11 points! 6/11 No new change in scores. 6/17 will start reducing utilization 6/16 30 days from the start of my experiment: EX -2, EQ - 11, TU - No change 6/24 down to 2% overall utilization, no change 6/27 Today TU dropped 3. After my utilization dropped from 3.9% to 2%. Go figure. 7/3 OK now I'm back down to .3% overall utilization, right where I started on 5/16. No further change in scores....yet.

NRB525 wrote:
There should not be much change by having your utilization go to 5%, as far as how it affects your score. I would suggest, though, that you are in a phase with your cards where you do not want to pay before statement cuts on any cards. I'm guessing you got a number of cards recently, thus the gardening mode. As you try to build your relationship with those CCC, they SP you periodically to see how your file is working. If you don't show any activity on many of your cards, they may be a little concerned. If they see a steady flow of PIF activity on most or all your cards, they will see a potential profitable customer and are more likely to not overreact if you start using their card more. There is something to be said for acting boldly and showing you can handle debt and payments. As to the 0% APR on the dental work, that's a way to show you can take on debt and pay it back, with no cost to you. This is another behavior you want all your CCC to see, to make them more comfortable with your file. The "All cards at zero but one" is fine for absolutely tweaking the last point out of your score (and thats about all I think it gets the cardholder). As a long term way to build the confidence of your several CCC so they don't overreact? In my opinion, it is not helpful to hide your good payment activity by this pay before statement cuts method. Your long term relationship with the cards you do have, that is your main goal now, not getting a bunch more cards. As your file ages and these cards show activity, adding the one or two other cards you want later, will be a cake walk, regardless of FICO score. By the time you get to adding the one or two other cards, your scores will have risen nicely anyway, even if you show PIF balances paid by the statement due date, boldly broadcasting that activity for all to see. Good luck!Thank you for all that good stuff. I have some questions: "As you try to build your relationship with those CCC, they SP you periodically to see how your file is working. If you don't show any activity on many of your cards, they may be a little concerned". They would take a zero statement balance on an active account as a sign that there was no activity? " If they see a steady flow of PIF activity on most or all your cards, they will see a potential profitable customer and are more likely to not overreact if you start using their card more. " By "PIF activity" you mean "PIF after letting a statement balance show" activity? "As to the 0% APR on the dental work, that's a way to show you can take on debt and pay it back, with no cost to you." They would know that it was promotional interest rate borrowing? "The "All cards at zero but one" is fine for absolutely tweaking the last point out of your score (and thats about all I think it gets the cardholder). As a long term way to build the confidence of your several CCC so they don't overreact? In my opinion, it is not helpful to hide your good payment activity by this pay before statement cuts method." Well basically "tweaking the last point out of [my] score" is what my question is about. I know that making my present credit card banks happy isn't impaired by my using their cards a lot so long as I pay them off. My question only relates to what kind of temporary hit my FICO scores will experience in the process. "Your long term relationship with the cards you do have, that is your main goal now, not getting a bunch more cards." Well I don't know about that; some of my cards aren't as good as others,, and none are low interest. Some have exorbitant balance transfer and cash advance fees. I would like to have some other cards which charge lower interest rates.

What kind of hit for carrying balances [update 6/24]

I've been keeping my utilization way low, with most accounts reporting zero, and the others reporting nominally, so that my utilization has been about a third of a percent. This week I decided to get some postponed dental work done, and to pay for it with some zero-interest-rate cards and not worry so much about the FICO scores. And I'm considering letting the balances ride for awhile, not paying them off totally, and letting my reported balances go up to the neighborhood of 5% overall utilization, with the zero interest cards just under 30%. How much of a hit can I expect on my FICO scores if I do in fact let my utilization go from a third of a percent to five percent? Even if you tell me I can expect a bad hit, I might do it anyway, just as an experiment...My scores are of only academic interest at this point since I should be gardening at this stage of the game. But I do wonder what lies ahead. Updates: 5/17 Started May 16th with: 10 accounts at zero balance, 3 accounts posting total balance of $241, representing less than .3% overall utilization Over the next 5 days, I allowed 3 of the 13 revolving accounts to post a total of $1524.33, for 1.7% overall utilization, with individual account utilization ranging from 2.13% to 49%. 5/22 EX dropped 2 points. 5/29 Balances up to $2700, representing 3% overall. No other score changes yet. 6/3 The entire $2700 has been reported to TU, and my TU score has not budged. 6/5 As of today I'm up to $3500, for 3.9% overall utilization. My only FICO change so far has been -2 on EX. But both my FAKO scores at Credit Karma just dropped 5 points, which makes me nervous. So I will probably let it peak at 3.9% and start bringing the numbers down now. 6/8 Boom! EQ FICO dropped 11 points! 6/11 No new change in scores. 6/17 will start reducing utilization 6/16 30 days from the start of my experiment: EX -2, EQ - 11, TU - No change 6/24 down to 2.4% overall utilization, no change 6/27 Today TU dropped 3. After my utilization dropped from 3.9% to 2.4%. Go figure.

NRB525 wrote:
There should not be much change by having your utilization go to 5%, as far as how it affects your score. I would suggest, though, that you are in a phase with your cards where you do not want to pay before statement cuts on any cards. I'm guessing you got a number of cards recently, thus the gardening mode. As you try to build your relationship with those CCC, they SP you periodically to see how your file is working. If you don't show any activity on many of your cards, they may be a little concerned. If they see a steady flow of PIF activity on most or all your cards, they will see a potential profitable customer and are more likely to not overreact if you start using their card more. There is something to be said for acting boldly and showing you can handle debt and payments. As to the 0% APR on the dental work, that's a way to show you can take on debt and pay it back, with no cost to you. This is another behavior you want all your CCC to see, to make them more comfortable with your file. The "All cards at zero but one" is fine for absolutely tweaking the last point out of your score (and thats about all I think it gets the cardholder). As a long term way to build the confidence of your several CCC so they don't overreact? In my opinion, it is not helpful to hide your good payment activity by this pay before statement cuts method. Your long term relationship with the cards you do have, that is your main goal now, not getting a bunch more cards. As your file ages and these cards show activity, adding the one or two other cards you want later, will be a cake walk, regardless of FICO score. By the time you get to adding the one or two other cards, your scores will have risen nicely anyway, even if you show PIF balances paid by the statement due date, boldly broadcasting that activity for all to see. Good luck!Thank you for all that good stuff. I have some questions: "As you try to build your relationship with those CCC, they SP you periodically to see how your file is working. If you don't show any activity on many of your cards, they may be a little concerned". They would take a zero statement balance on an active account as a sign that there was no activity? " If they see a steady flow of PIF activity on most or all your cards, they will see a potential profitable customer and are more likely to not overreact if you start using their card more. " By "PIF activity" you mean "PIF after letting a statement balance show" activity? "As to the 0% APR on the dental work, that's a way to show you can take on debt and pay it back, with no cost to you." They would know that it was promotional interest rate borrowing? "The "All cards at zero but one" is fine for absolutely tweaking the last point out of your score (and thats about all I think it gets the cardholder). As a long term way to build the confidence of your several CCC so they don't overreact? In my opinion, it is not helpful to hide your good payment activity by this pay before statement cuts method." Well basically "tweaking the last point out of [my] score" is what my question is about. I know that making my present credit card banks happy isn't impaired by my using their cards a lot so long as I pay them off. My question only relates to what kind of temporary hit my FICO scores will experience in the process. "Your long term relationship with the cards you do have, that is your main goal now, not getting a bunch more cards." Well I don't know about that; some of my cards aren't as good as others,, and none are low interest. Some have exorbitant balance transfer and cash advance fees. I would like to have some other cards which charge lower interest rates.

NAT list getting hit for traffic from WAN IP

I have an 871 setup at home with a fairly basic configuration (NAT, Firewall, EasyVPN, Wireless). What I've noticed is that for traffic going from the WAN interface (FastEthernet4), it seems to be hitting the ACL in place for NAT. My config:
interface Loopback0
ip address 192.168.254.1 255.255.255.255
interface FastEthernet4
description Cable Modem Connection
bandwidth 384
ip address dhcp
ip nat outside
ip nat enable
no ip virtual-reassembly
duplex auto
speed auto
interface Vlan1
no ip address
bridge-group 1
interface BVI1
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
ip nat inside source list NATLIST interface FastEthernet4 overload
ip access-list extended NATLIST
permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
deny ip any any log
Seems to work just fine, but I will see this in my logs:
Oct 30 17:21:38 PDT: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list NATLIST denied udp 76.22.98.39(0) -> 68.87.69.146(0), 1 packet
Oct 30 17:21:38 PDT: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list NATLIST denied udp 76.22.98.39(0) -> 140.142.16.34(0), 1 packet
Oct 30 17:21:56 PDT: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGDP: list NATLIST denied icmp 76.22.98.39 -> 24.64.94.41 (0/0), 1 packet
Oct 30 17:23:38 PDT: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list NATLIST denied udp 76.22.98.39(0) -> 207.188.29.230(0), 1 packet
Oct 30 17:25:38 PDT: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGDP: list NATLIST denied icmp 76.22.98.39 -> 121.18.13.100 (0/0), 2 packets
Oct 30 17:27:38 PDT: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGDP: list NATLIST denied icmp 76.22.98.39 -> 24.64.94.41 (0/0), 1 packet
Where 76.22.98.39 is the dynamic IP address from the cable provider. If the traffic isn't passing through the router, why is it trying to NAT it?
IOS Version is 12.4(6)T9

Hello Brom,
I am facing the same situation that I can see a whole bunch of log-entries which state that IP-packets with the source address of the routers own WAN-interface-address are trying to reach a variety of IPs somewhere out there.
I don't feel fine with just ignoring something - in only very rare situations this has been a good advise. I believe this is not a solution.
There's just one naging question you should be able to answer.
Since when needs the routers traffic translation? If the router sends packets because it want's to reach a destination for some reason it uses as source-address the address of the interface the traffic is supposed to leave and send's it directly there, doesn't it?
So why in the world are there thousends of packets denied by the NAT-process (ofcourse, the NATACL doesn't allow this address), all showing the same pattern
(pattern == protocol=udp AND source=ownWANIP AND port=0 AND destination=someIPoutthere AND port=0) as you can see from the following output, cause I think this is supicious and tryed it - wow! How do these packets get to the NAT-process anyway?!
000894: Oct 10 06:57:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
000895: Oct 10 06:58:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 4 packets
000896: Oct 10 06:59:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 1 packet
000897: Oct 10 06:59:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 1 packet
000898: Oct 10 07:02:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
000899: Oct 10 07:04:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 16 packets
000900: Oct 10 07:05:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 2 packets
000901: Oct 10 07:05:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 2 packets
000902: Oct 10 07:08:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
000903: Oct 10 07:09:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 5 packets
000904: Oct 10 07:11:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 1 packet
000905: Oct 10 07:11:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 1 packet
000906: Oct 10 07:13:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
000907: Oct 10 07:14:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 14 packets
000908: Oct 10 07:16:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 2 packets
000909: Oct 10 07:16:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 2 packets
000910: Oct 10 07:18:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 2 packets
000911: Oct 10 07:19:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 2 packets
000913: Oct 10 07:22:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 2 packets
000914: Oct 10 07:22:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 3 packets
000915: Oct 10 07:23:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 2 packets
000916: Oct 10 07:24:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 8 packets
000917: Oct 10 07:27:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 3 packets
000918: Oct 10 07:27:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 2 packets
000919: Oct 10 07:29:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 3 packets
000920: Oct 10 07:30:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 2 packets
000921: Oct 10 07:33:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 3 packets
000922: Oct 10 07:33:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 3 packets
000923: Oct 10 07:34:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 2 packets
000924: Oct 10 07:35:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 24 packets
000925: Oct 10 07:38:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 2 packets
000926: Oct 10 07:38:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 2 packets
000928: Oct 10 07:39:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 3 packets
000929: Oct 10 07:43:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 1 packet
000930: Oct 10 07:43:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 2 packets
000931: Oct 10 07:43:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 2 packets
000932: Oct 10 07:44:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 2 packets
000936: Oct 10 07:47:35: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FAE00IN denied tcp 222.173.130.154(6000) -> 212.152.155.204(1433), 1 packet
000937: Oct 10 07:49:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 2 packets
000938: Oct 10 07:49:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 2 packets
000939: Oct 10 07:49:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 2 packets
000940: Oct 10 07:50:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 2 packets
000941: Oct 10 07:54:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 5 packets
000942: Oct 10 07:54:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 1 packet
000943: Oct 10 07:54:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 1 packet
000946: Oct 10 07:56:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 2 packets
000947: Oct 10 08:00:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 7 packets
000948: Oct 10 08:00:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 2 packets
000949: Oct 10 08:00:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 2 packets
000950: Oct 10 08:01:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
000951: Oct 10 08:05:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 15 packets
000952: Oct 10 08:05:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 1 packet
000953: Oct 10 08:05:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 1 packet
000954: Oct 10 08:06:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
000956: Oct 10 08:10:26: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGDP: list FORNAT denied icmp 212.152.155.204 -> 172.16.0.151 (0/0), 1 packet
000957: Oct 10 08:10:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 6 packets
000958: Oct 10 08:10:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 1 packet
000959: Oct 10 08:10:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 1 packet
000960: Oct 10 08:11:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
000961: Oct 10 08:14:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FAE00IN denied tcp 216.133.175.69(2087) -> 212.152.155.204(5900), 1 packet
000962: Oct 10 08:16:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
000963: Oct 10 08:16:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 11 packets
000964: Oct 10 08:16:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 2 packets
000966: Oct 10 08:16:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 2 packets
000968: Oct 10 08:21:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
000969: Oct 10 08:21:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 6 packets
000970: Oct 10 08:21:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 1 packet
000971: Oct 10 08:21:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 1 packet
000972: Oct 10 08:27:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 2 packets
000973: Oct 10 08:27:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 3 packets
000974: Oct 10 08:27:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 1 packet
000975: Oct 10 08:27:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 1 packet
000976: Oct 10 08:33:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
000977: Oct 10 08:33:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 29 packets
000978: Oct 10 08:33:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 2 packets
000979: Oct 10 08:33:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 2 packets
000980: Oct 10 08:38:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
000981: Oct 10 08:39:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 1 packet
000982: Oct 10 08:39:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 1 packet
000983: Oct 10 08:43:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 2 packets
000984: Oct 10 08:43:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 1 packet
000985: Oct 10 08:44:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 1 packet
000986: Oct 10 08:44:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 1 packet
000987: Oct 10 08:49:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 2 packets
000988: Oct 10 08:50:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 1 packet
000989: Oct 10 08:50:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 1 packet
000990: Oct 10 08:52:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
000991: Oct 10 08:54:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 5 packets
000992: Oct 10 08:59:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 6 packets
000993: Oct 10 08:59:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 1 packet
000994: Oct 10 08:59:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 1 packet
000995: Oct 10 09:00:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
000996: Oct 10 09:05:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 17 packets
000997: Oct 10 09:07:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 1 packet
000998: Oct 10 09:07:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 1 packet
000999: Oct 10 09:09:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
001002: Oct 10 09:10:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 7 packets
001003: Oct 10 09:15:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 14 packets
001004: Oct 10 09:16:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 1 packet
001005: Oct 10 09:16:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 1 packet
001006: Oct 10 09:17:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
001007: Oct 10 09:21:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 6 packets
001008: Oct 10 09:24:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 1 packet
001009: Oct 10 09:24:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 1 packet
001010: Oct 10 09:26:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
001012: Oct 10 09:27:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 4 packets
001013: Oct 10 09:32:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 26 packets
001014: Oct 10 09:33:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 1 packet
001015: Oct 10 09:33:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 1 packet
001016: Oct 10 09:35:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
001017: Oct 10 09:37:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 1 packet
001018: Oct 10 09:41:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 1 packet
001019: Oct 10 09:41:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 1 packet
001020: Oct 10 09:43:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet
001021: Oct 10 09:43:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 1 packet
001022: Oct 10 09:48:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 195.96.0.3(0), 74 packets
001023: Oct 10 09:50:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 130.149.17.21(0), 1 packet
001024: Oct 10 09:50:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.12(0), 1 packet
001027: Oct 10 09:52:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list FORNAT denied udp 212.152.155.204(0) -> 131.130.1.11(0), 1 packet

HIT for RHEL 7

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for