How about a separate forum Database-Performance

hi friends/Moderators,
I had one thing to give feedback/suggestion to give , but didnt know of any link/place to put it.
So opening a new thread over it.
I see many new threads related to Database Performance, sql tuning, redo/undo ( and many other architecture related things which can impact the performance of the database).
How about a idea of having another forum Database-Performance like we have Database-General now?
Personally I would like to start replying to performance related questions so that apart from helping the OPs i learn more about performance issues which other people see or face outside of my workplace.
What do you guys say?
Cheers!

Kunwar wrote:
hi friends/Moderators,
I had one thing to give feedback/suggestion to give , but didnt know of any link/place to put it.
So opening a new thread over it.For such questions, please post them over the Community Discussions forum.
I see many new threads related to Database Performance, sql tuning, redo/undo ( and many other architecture related things which can impact the performance of the database).
How about a idea of having another forum Database-Performance like we have Database-General now?
Personally I would like to start replying to performance related questions so that apart from helping the OPs i learn more about performance issues which other people see or face outside of my workplace.
What do you guys say?
This was asked by me in 2008. Please have a read of the thread,
Can We Have a Perfomance Tuning Forum?
That said, it may break things even more. Don't take it personally but just take the example of this question. You are here from some time now and even then, you wrongly posted this question in a product forum even when there is already a non-technical, community feedback forum is in place. So may be people won't use a separate forum of Performance and will keep on posting the questions in different forums, just like what happens now too. And with every new forum added, the overhead would also increase (my guess) .
And another thing that comes to mind is that since the forums are already scheduled for a major upgrade in the mid-April , I doubt that such request would be fulfilled , at least right now because last time, when the upgrade of the forums happened, it wasn't a smooth one and the focus of the OTN team would be surely to make sure that the history won't repeat itself.
Just my 2 cents.
Aman....

Similar Messages

How about some New Forums for JSC?

I read somewhere that the JSC forum is Sun's highest activity forum. The trouble is, there's a lot of information mixed together.
Would it be possible to create several forums (or subforums) for JSC? Here's some I'd suggest:
Help: newbie requests for JSC help (like how do I create a datatable)
Problems: place to ask for help with technical problems, like DB connectivity, use with a given server, installation problems, etc.
Bugs: Bugs, deficiencies and workarounds
Examples/Solutions: place to show nifty tricks that have been found, or how to do something complicated.
Suggestions: Suggestions for the JSC team
General: Other stuff not covered above.
IMHO, breaking the forum into these logical groups would make the forum much more useful. Perhaps the categories above aren't perfect or complete. However, something in this direction would be good.

In a perfect world, the topics would be sorted into forums. However, these could be left in general, and start with the new categories empty. At least new discussion would be more organized.
It would also be extremely helpful to move old, obsolete topics to somewhere else, or delete them. I don't now how many times I've begun reading a post only to find it applies to an earlier version of creator, and since then the bug, problem or whatever has been fixed anyway.

How about the Graphic Performance?

Hello all!
May someone can help me to get that clarified ...
I have a MacMini with Thunderbolt connection. Latley I started to use RC Flight simulator which challenges the video card of my MacMini pretty much.
How about a Thunderbolt Display? Will TB just "substitute" my current HDMI-Connection or will some computing power be "outsourced" to the display? In other words: will the graphic performance of my MacMini improve using a TB-Display or does it stay the same because the build in video card is still "in charge"?
Thx for your help!

No question the Thunderbolt is without doubt a fantastic display, however to answer your question I'm personally experiencing a performance drop (see my very recent thread in this forum).
One of my reasons for finally getting the Thunderbolt Display was to enjoy some proper gaming on a big screen for 3D games both within OS X and Bootcamp. Even when I match my MacBook Pro 17" unibody's (early 2011) top resolution with the Thunderbolt Display for a like for like comparison, I get a performance drop which I was hoping would never happen. I was hoping that with the MacBook Pro in closed 'clamshell' and thus the MacBook Pro switching it's own display 'off' and presumably diverting all of the GPU's performance power straight to the Thunderbolt Display via it's direct fast Thunderbolt bus; that it would at the very very least match the performance when using the MacBook Pro's own display, but currently I have to choose the 'very low' graphics setting on some games to maintain a decent frame-rate for smooth game play.
Mybe this is not a permanent Thunderbolt Display problem/fault and might be resolved at some point by means of a software, display driver or display/thunderbolt/GPU firmware update. If that be the case then I'll know there's hope at the end of the tunnel. Understandably I wasn't expecting my MacBook Pro 17" early 2011 to perform miracles with it's graphics performance anyhow, but it's 1GB Graphics adapter isn't all that bad either and is a half decent card that can give acceptable results. But If you where to match the resolution of the Thunderbolt Display to that of the MacBook Pro for comparison for yourself and then run a 3D game like say 'Dirt 2', you will soon realise there are slight performance issues; unless of course I'm doing something wrong.
Here's hoping this may only be a temporary drawback for the Thunderbolt Display with 3D applications/gaming.

How to report database performance to upper management?

Hello all.
I am looking for a way to report database performance to upper management. I'll start by giving you an overview of our team structure. I manage a team of various roles: Level 2 support specialists, configuration managers, and DBAs - we are dubbed the
"Production Support Team". I report directly to the VP of Software Development who oversees the Design, DEV, and QA, team managers. This means that our team, Production Support, can be considered a peer team of Design, DEV, and QA.
The manager of each team compiles metrics from their team members and reviews them on a weekly basis to ensure we are headed in the right direction. We then take our metrics, and distill them down into a few key metrics that we then report to the VP
of Software Development. Those metrics are easy tom compile for the L2 support roles (number of tickets escalated, number closed, etc.). However, I've been struggling with how to report DBA performance for a long time. Every time I start
to compile numbers, I end up with tons of things that are great for a DBA, but don't mean much to upper management. Does anyone have any suggestions. Surely I'm not the only person that has had this issue?
I'd be happy to provide more info if needed. Thanks!
Clint

are you using an RTF template ?
in the RTF template you need to use this syntax for the HTML enabled field
<?html2fo:MOSC_COMMENTS?>
instead of <?MOSC_COMMENTS?>

How about a new "Change My Email Address" forum?

Since it doesn't look like you have any interest in letting people update their email address, how about if you create a new "Change My Email Address" forum so at least we can all gripe in one place?
Mark Petereit
[email protected]
(NOT [email protected])

Well, I know I am on eof teh peopel that you constantly ignore.
But here is a question:
Why don't you send this link http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=332623&tstart=0 to your manager?

How to find cause of db performance problem??

Hi,
I am facing continuous performance issues with our database and for that I want to know how I can get information about the following points:
1- How to find most accessed table(s) or tables with highest hits or top queries is accessing which table(s)?
2- What indication can tell that a particular table need to be rebuilt?
3- When to rebuild indexes? and how to know that an indexed need to be rebuilt?
Your prompt reply is highly appreciated
Thanks,
Younis

Hi,
a good starting point for investigating poor database performance is AWR (if you have a license for that) or statspack (if you don't). If you need help interpreting it, you can refer to J. Lewis's series on statspack reports (also applies to AWR):
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/statspack-reports/
I have also made a few blog posts on this topic, see http://savvinov.com/tag/awr/
Regarding your other questions -- countrary to popular belief, rebuilding indexes or tables is seldom helpful. More often, performance problems are caused by bad execution plans (side effects of bind peaking, inaccurate statistics, correlated predicates etc.), data design issues, bad coding practices, not using bind variables etc.
Database performance topic is a huge topic and obviously cannot fit into a discussion thread. Christian Antognini's book "Oracle Performance Troubleshooting" can provide you a gentle introduction into performance tuning, provided you already have good familiarity with Oracle architecture.
Or, if you want help with your particular problem, post your AWR report here and briefly describe what your users are unhappy about -- there is a good chance that you get valuable feedback from several renowned experts.
Good luck!
Best regards,
Nikolay

Database Performance: Large execution time.

Hi,
I have TPC-h database of size 1GB. I am running a nested query having multiple joins between 5 tables and a group by and order by on three attributes. It took around 1 hour for this query to get executed (also it was fired for the point which can be considered as the center of selectivity range.).
Following is the query:
select
 supp_nation,
 cust_nation,
 l_year,
 sum(volume)
from
 select
 n1.n_name as supp_nation,
 n2.n_name as cust_nation,
 YEAR (l_shipdate) as l_year,
 l_extendedprice * (1 - l_discount) as volume
 from
 supplier,
 lineitem,
 orders,
 customer,
 nation n1,
 nation n2
 where
 s_suppkey = l_suppkey
 and o_orderkey = l_orderkey
 and c_custkey = o_custkey
 and s_nationkey = n1.n_nationkey
 and c_nationkey = n2.n_nationkey
 and (
 (n1.n_name = 'FRANCE' and n2.n_name = 'GERMANY')
 or (n1.n_name = 'GERMANY' and n2.n_name = 'FRANCE')
 and l_shipdate between '1995-01-01' and '1996-12-31'
 and o_totalprice <= 246835
 and c_acctbal <= -422.16
 )as shipping
group by
 supp_nation,
 cust_nation,
 l_year
order by
 supp_nation,
 cust_nation,
 l_year
Moreover it has been observed that such types of queries viz., nested, sub queries, aggregation are taking very high amount of time for execution as compared to other databases. The above mentioned query took only 18 seconds to execute in ORACLE server.
The machine configuration and the database configuration are as follows:
Machine:
64-bit Windows Vista operating System.
RAM: 8GB.
CPU: 3.0 GHZ
Database:
Data Area: No. of Volumes: 1, Size of Volume: 4GB (as mentioned on wiki, for 10 GB database 4 volumes must be assigned.)
Log Area: Volume: 1, Size: 1GB
Data and Log are on same disk.
Caches:
I/O Buffer Cache: 1 GB
Data Cache: 1 GB
Catalog Cache: 30 MB
Parameters:
CacheMemorySize - 131072
ReadAheadLobThreshold- 3000
Also, we have set other optimizer parameters as required and recommended by SAPDB. Even then I am not able get better performance.
How to increase or better the performance? Is there any other parameter that remains to be set?

> I have TPC-h database of size 1GB. I am running a nested query having multiple joins between 5 tables and a group by and order by on three attributes. It took around 1 hour for this query to get executed (also it was fired for the point which can be considered as the center of selectivity range.).
> Moreover it has been observed that such types of queries viz., nested, sub queries, aggregation are taking very high amount of time for execution as compared to other databases. The above mentioned query took only 18 seconds to execute in ORACLE server.
Such general statements are usually total crap.
MaxDB is running for many SAP customer and SAP internally in many installations - even for BI systems.
We don't know your Oracle server, we don't know the execution plans - so there's nothing to tell why it may be the case here.
> Data Area: No. of Volumes: 1, Size of Volume: 4GB (as mentioned on wiki, for 10 GB database 4 volumes must be assigned.)
It's a rule of thumb - having just one volume is a rather bad idea since you don't get parallel I/O with that.
> Log Area: Volume: 1, Size: 1GB
> Data and Log are on same disk.
Although this is irrelevant for the query performance it's nonsense in productive environments and a performance killer as well.
> I/O Buffer Cache: 1 GB
> Data Cache: 1 GB
Why don't you allow more Cache ?
> Catalog Cache: 30 MB
What for? Do you understand the catalog cache in MaxDB?
It's a per session setting...
> Also, we have set other optimizer parameters as required and recommended by SAPDB. Even then I am not able get better performance.
Can you be more specific here?
What MaxDB version are you using? What parameter settings do you use?
> How to increase or better the performance? Is there any other parameter that remains to be set?
How about showing us the execution plan for the statement and the index structure?
How should we know what MaxDB does here that takes so much time?
Did you have the DBanalyzer running while the query ran?
TPC-H is a benchmark for ad-hoc, decision making support: did you enable any of the BI feature pack features of MaxDB? What about prefetching? What about table clustering, column compression, star join optimization ...?
All in all - you left us here with "MaxDB is slower than Oracle" and nothing to work on.
That's not useful in any way.
Want some answers - provide some information!
regards,
Lars

How Can we improve the report performance..?

Hi exports,
I am learning the Business Objects XIR2, Please let me know How Can we improve the report performance..?
Please give the answer in detailed way.

First find out why your report is performing slowly. Then fix it.
That sounds silly, but there's really no single-path process for improving report performance. You might find issues with the report. With the network. With the universe. With the database. With the database design. With the query definition. With report variables. With the ETL. Once you figure out where the problem is, then you start fixing it. Fixing one problem may very well reveal another. I spent two years working on a project where we touched every single aspect of reporting (from data collection through ETL and all the way to report delivery) at some point or another.
I feel like your question is a bit broad (meaning too generic) to address as you have phrased it. Even some of the suggestions already given...
Array fetch size - this determines the number of rows fetched at a single pass. You really don't need to modify this unless your network is giving issues. I have seen folks suggest setting this to one (which results in a lot of network requests) or 500 (which results in fewer requests but they're much MUCH larger). Does either improve performance? They might, or they might make it worse. Without understanding how your network traffic is managed it's hard to say.
Shortcut joins? Sure, they can help, as long as they are appropriate. [Many times they are not.|http://www.dagira.com/2010/05/27/everything-about-shortcut-joins/]
And I could go on and on. The bottom line is that performance tuning doesn't typically fall into a "cookie cutter" approach. It would be better to have a specific question.

Regarding Database Performance

Hi All,
I have installed *10gR2 on RHEL4 (4GB -- RAM, space is enough)*. One application (oracle ucm) is running on that. Its contains apache and content server. After 2-3 weeks, developers were saying taking long time for opening url. So done gather database statistics (after that daily gathering db stats using scheduler). After that, it was working fine. Again after week they are having the prob. They are doing lot of dml on db. Checked in os level using top command. But oracle ( installed entire application as oracle) user is not consuming that much memory. set pga_aggregate_target to about 500M. Sga (sga_max_size --- 950M) is auto tuning. db is of size 8GB. workarea_policy_size is auto.
Please suggest any solutions for improving database performance.
Thanks,
Manikandan.

daily gathering db stats using scheduler)Done by default on V10+
Please suggest any solutions for improving database performance.Ready, Fire, Aim!
Is any OS resource the bottleneck; CPU, RAM, IO, network?
During slow period what is reported by AWR?
Please read these:
When your query takes too long
When your query takes too long ...
How to Post a SQL statement tuning request
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
Edited by: sb92075 on Jul 27, 2010 10:01 AM

How the Sun Java Forums Work (Briefly)

I am wondering if anyone could give me a brief overview of how the Java sun forums work -- esp. when someone creates a new thread.
How exactly does the JSP know to link to that thread? Is it generating a unique ID from the database or using it's own custom code? How does it point to that thread? (I'm SO FRUSTRATED. I've tried to figure this one out for about a MONTH.)
I've started to create a help desk, where it takes form data and posts it to the database. (That issue solved.) The database assigns it a unique ID -- primary key. I'm having trouble displaying the problem record for that ticket ID. (I'm new to Java and really been pulling my hair over this one for about a month.)
Let me go into some more detail:
I have these form objects:
- Name
- Technical Summary
- Severity
- Problem
This is a standard html form page. The standard html page posts to a JSP page, where the JSP page uses a prepared statement to insert the form data into the database. The query page, (query.jsp) has a table, which only shows TicketID, Name, Technical Summary, and Severity. Obviously, the TicketID is an int and generated by the DB, as 1, 2, 3, 4, and so on...
So if someone created an issue it'd be assigned a unique ticket id. Note that from the query page, it DOES not show the problem. I WANT there to be a link to get the problem record in that row.
If anyone could help me out with this one, that would be great.

Below is the CORE JSP Query Code. Obviously, I did NOT post the HTML b/c that would look **REALLY** weird. Any help on resolving my problem, would relly be helpful! Please hep! :)
<%@ page import="java.sql.*"%>
<%
String first_name = user.getFirstName();
String last_name = user.getLastName();
%>
<%
String userid = user.getUserId();
%>
<%
Connection conn = null;
Statement stmt = null;
ResultSet rs = null;
try {
Class.forName ("com.mysql.jdbc.Driver");
conn = DriverManager.getConnection( "jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/helpdesk", "root", "password" );
stmt = conn.createStatement ();
rs = stmt.executeQuery ("SELECT * FROM history WHERE userid = '"+userid+"' ");
%>
<% while( rs.next() ){%>
<%
int ticketid = rs.getInt("ticketid");
String technical_subject = rs.getString("technical_subject");
session.setAttribute("technical_subject", technical_subject);
%>
<TR>
<TD width="76" align="center">
 <%out.println(ticketid);%> </TD>
 <TD align="center" width="131">
 <%=rs.getString("severity")%> </TD>
 <TD align="center">
 <%=rs.getString("issue_type")%> </TD>
 <TD align="center">
 <%out.println(technical_subject);%> </TD>
 <TD align="center">
 View
 Complete Issue</TD>
</TR>
<%}%>
</TABLE>
</BODY>
</HTML>
<%
}catch
 (Exception e){
out.println("There was an exception. Stack trace will be printed to the error log.");
e.printStackTrace();
System.out.println ("A fatal exception occured when fetching the database results. See the stack trace error for more information. Verify you are requesteting the correct data type");
}finally{
//this is important. You should close all three to free up resources. Always. In a finally block.
rs.close();
stmt.close();
conn.close();
%>

Oracle 11 G database performance tuning

How to indexing the oracle 11G database?
Thanks in advance.

Your question is like if you ask "Tell me how to fix a car". As you know people spend years learning how to fix different problems with cars; the same applies to database performance tuning. There is no way to answer this question in one post. Please ask a more specific question in an apropriate (database related) forum.
cheers

How can i improve my system performance

hello Experts,
today i faced one problem
i,e i got mails from users that my server is very slow
i checked
responce time--985ms
and no long running jobs and also buffers also fine
in my system all things are fine
now want to know to check how much network utilization required to my sap server?
i have doubt in network utilization ....i need help in tis way only
Regards

Is the DB on a separate server? I ask because even a fairly slow public network (i.e. for SAPGUI) is unlikely to be a cause of major performance problems. Note 'unlikely', not 'impossible'. If the DB is separated from CI and/or DI and that link is 100Mb/s, things can get nasty.
Slow performance is real tricky to solve blind. You say your system is fine and you mention SAP-level metrics. How about other stuff?
Paging rate
CPU load averages
Runaway processes at O/S level
If Windows server, check for an antivirus program monitoring \usr\sap\.....
Filesystem/volume access speeds
System log messages (OS not SAP)
Regards,
Alan.

Database Performance Slow

Hi to all,
My database performance is suddenly going slow. My PGA Cahe hit percentage remain in 96%.
I will list out the findidngs I found...
Some tables were not analyzed since Dec2007. Some tables were never analyzed.
(Will the tables were analyzed the performance will be improved for this scenario)
PGA Allocated is 400MB. But till now the max pga allocated is 95MB since Instance started (11 Nov 08 - Instance started date).
(I persume we have Over allocated PGA can i reduce it to 200MB and increase the Shared pool and Buffer Cache 100MB each?)
Memory Configuration:
Buffer Cache: 504 MB
Shared Pool: 600 MB
Java Pool: 24MB
Large Pool: 24MB
SGA Max Size is: 1201.72 MB
PGA Aggregate is: 400 MB
My Database resided in Windows 2003 Server Standard Edition with 4GB of RAM.
Please give me suggestions.
Thanks and Regards,
Vijayaraghavan K

Vijayaraghavan Krishnan wrote:
My database performance is suddenly going slow. My PGA Cahe hit percentage remain in 96%.
Some tables were not analyzed since Dec2007. Some tables were never analyzed.
PGA Allocated is 400MB. But till now the max pga allocated is 95MB since Instance started (11 Nov 08 - Instance started date).
(I persume we have Over allocated PGA can i reduce it to 200MB and increase the Shared pool and Buffer Cache 100MB each?)
You are in an awkward situtation - your database is behaving badly, but it has been in an unhealthy state for a very long time, and any "simple" change you make to address the performance could have unpredictable side effects.
At this moment you have to think at two levels - tactical and strategic.
Tactical - is there anything you can do in the short term to address the immediate problem.
Strategic - what is the longer-term plan to sort out the state of the database.
Strategically, you should be heading for a database with correct indexing, representative data statistics, optimium resource allocation, minimum hacking in the parameter file, and (probably) implementation of "system statistics".
Tactically, you need to find out which queries (old or new) have suddenly introduced an extra work load, or whether there has been an increase in the number of end-users, or other tasks running on the machine.
For a quick and dirty approach you could start by checking v$sql every few minutes for recent SQL that might be expensive; or run checks for SQL that has executed a very large number of times, or has used a lot of CPU, or has done a lot of disk I/O or buffer gets.
You could also install statspack and start taking snapshots hourly at level 7, then run off reports covering intervals when the system is slow - again a quick check would be to look at the "SQL ordered by .." sections of the report to the expensive SQL.
If you are lucky, there will be a few nasty SQL statements that you can identify as responsible for most of your resource usage - then you can decide what to do about them
Regarding pga_aggregate_target: this is a value that is available for sharing across all processes; from the name you've used, I think you may be looking at a figure for a single specific process - so I wouldn't reduce the pga_aggregate_target just yet.
If you want to post a statspack report to the forum, we may be able to make a few further suggestions. (Use the "code" tags - in curly brackets { } to make the report readable in a fixed fontRegards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
"The temptation to form premature theories upon insufficient data is the bane of our profession."
Sherlock Holmes (Sir Arthur Conan Doyle) in "The Valley of Fear".

Database performance issue (8.1.7.0)

Hi,
We are having tablespace "payin" in our database (8.1.7.0) .
This tablespace is the main Tablespace of our database which is dictionary managed and heavily accessed by the user SQL statements.
Now we are facing the database performance issue during the peak time (i.e. at the month end) when no. of users use to run the no. of large reports.
We have also increased the SGA sufficiently on the basis of RAM size.
This tablespace is heavily accessed for the reports.
Now my question is,
Is this performance issue is because the tablespace is "dictionary managed" instead of locally managed ?
because when i monitor the different sessions through OEM, the no. of hard parses is more for the connected users.
Actually the hard parses should be less.
In oracle 8.1.7.0 Can we convert dictionary managed tablespace to locally managed tablespace ?
by doing so will the problem will get somewhat resolve ? will it reduce the overhead on the dictionary tables and on the shared memory ?
If yes then how what is procedure to convert the tablespace from dictionary to locally managed ?
With Regards

If your end users are just running reports against this tablespace, I don't think that the tablespace management (LM/DM) matters here. You should be concerned more about the TEMP tablespace (for heavy sort operations) and your shared pool size (as you have seen hard parses go up).
As already stated, get statspack running and also try tracing user sessions with wait events. Might give you more clues.

New HP EVA6000 SAN and now bad database performance problems

Hello,
we changed our SAN Hardware to a HP EVA6000 and moved all Data to there.
It is intended that storagesystem is for all Servers (File/Print, Exchange, Oracle Databases and MSSQL Databases).
According to the best practice papers of HP we created one big discgroup (fata harddiscs) and created virtual discs for our servers.
After doing this the database performance was terrible bad!
Especially the multiple random IO is absolutely worse.
As a first countermeasure we created a second discgroup on faster harddiscs and moved the database contents to there. We analyzed the IO and moved several database file to different virtual discs.
The performance is better now, but still not like the 4 year old SAN System!
Of course we questioned HP and even let them do a performance analysis but up to now we have no solution... The performance analysis report will be available on thursday.
Does anybody had the same experience or how did you configure the Database and EVA SAN to work with an appropiate performance?

Hi,
I'm not an Oracle person, but do work with EVA SAN's.
Your 48 FATA disk, disk group is capable of 4800 I/O operations per second [48 x 100] but the disks are only rated for 30% duty cycle and spin at 7200 rpm.
The 16 FC drive Disk Group I/O operations rating depends on the speed the disks spin at. 10K rpm disks are rated at 130 I/O per sec [2080 for the group] and if they are 15K rpm disks then 170 I/O per sec [2720 for the group]. Both are rated for 100% duty cycle.
I seem to recall having have read somewhere that Oracle prefers to have it's logs on separate storage to it's data.
If your shelves had the spare disk slots I would put in 72 GB 15K rpm disks up to the capacity required {+ overhead } + head room for reasonably predictable growth over the anticpated life of the equipment.
Here is a link to the HP Best Practice guide for EVA 4/6/8000's
http://h71028.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/4AA0-2787ENW.pdf
I hope this helps you understand the storage that you are working with a bit better. The old saying of "more heads make for better performance" is still true, however budget can have some affect in performance. ;-)
Jim

How about a separate forum Database-Performance

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for