How to avoid multiple users accessing same test data via parameterization in LR??

i am using LR11.5, i have the following test data&colon;
TestData
1
2
3
4
5
when i run this script from Controller with 3 users LR picks it as user1->1, user2->1, user3->1
How do i achieve this case: user1->1, user2->2, user3->3 ??
Any help would be great.

I have a related question. i created 2 websites/domains then i went to users and created 2 seperate "network" users then i went to ftp and selected each website and added only user A to site A and user B to site B. what's weird is that when i try to ftp using either of the users it seems to land on the same site. i looked at shared security for the folders and it only shows user a on site a folder and user b on site b folders. am i doing somehitng wrong or is this how it works in mountain lion server? i just want to give the domain owner ftp access so they can manage their files and only thier files. i also had to turn on open directory so that it would not create a local user but a network user. do i need to turn that off and just deal with having a bunch of local users as ftp user? i want to host multiple websites on the server and NO users remote on to server besides ftp.
edit 1: i only have 1 IP running on the server which i don't think it has any affect on this but thought i mention it :-)
edit 2: i just noticed one more thing that may help. i used filezilla to remote in using both users, one at a time. it seems to allow both users in but then it shows same directories. i then created a file using the one that was not supposed to have acces and it never sows up. but if i remote desktop to server i can see the new file in the correct folder. so it may have something to d o with the directory listing.

Similar Messages

How to avoid multiple listing for same artist?

How to avoid multiple listing for same artist?

Sounds like there might be blanks in the artist name.
For instance "Lou Reed" and "Lou Reed_" will not match.
(Pretend the underscore _ is a blank).
Select all the Lou Reed songs, Get Info, and type "Lou Reed" in the artist field. That should fix it.

How to avoid multiple users to access same tcode

Hi all,
Am creating one z tcode to display the material details for the particular reservation number. How can I avoid multiple users to access the same tcode simultaneously. If anybody works over that tcode then no other user should be able to access the same tcode until or unless the first user works over it.
Regards,
Ramya

HI,
you can even use import and export logic and check if user has entered the transaction ..
Regards,
Santosh
Message was edited by:
Santosh Kumar Patha

How to avoid multiple LOGIN with same user in database.

Hi All,
Using database triggers how to control multiple logins of a pertiuclar user.
thanks in advance

Don't forget to activate the RESOURCE_LIMIT parameter, which default is FALSE :
alter system set RESOURCE_LIMIT = true;
Laurent, I had a similar problem some time ago : I didn't want to avoid multiple access, but only control who was doing what. That's because moving from Client/Server to Web the TERMINAL column in V$SESSION becomes useless.
I tried your solution, but I had to give up with it, because in my Forms9i application some forms call Reports, which generate a new session.
I decided to use DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO, and this is satisfactory for my requirements, but I'm interested to discover other solutions.
P.S. with my solution I'm able to limit accesses, because in the CLIENT_INFO string I put, among other things, the
application user, so I can control if an user is already connected. The problem is that existing applications have to be modified .....:-(

Multiple users accessing same events

Good Afternoon, i wondered if anyone could assist me. I have described what is going on and have a few questins which i have added in bold.
We are a school in the UK running three Apple suites with a mixture of iMacs and macbooks.
The scenario: We have local users accessing some video footage to create a trailer and i would like to find the best method for this.
The Problem: We opted to use local users rather than network users as i believe imported video events are stored locally. Is this correct?
Based on the previous problem i have created two users, User1 & User2. If User1 imports the event then User2 cant see this and would like to work on the same event, then they have to import the event again. Is there anyway that User1 & User 2 could access the same event without doubling it up?
The problem does change slightly that if i use a networked user, and run iMovie then they can see the events on the local hdd. This only happens on certain machines. Any ideas why this would happen?
If anyone can help in anyway it would be much appreciated.
Thanks

The Problem: We opted to use local users rather than network users as i believe imported video events are stored locally. Is this correct?
Yes, the are stored locally, I don't know if Network users do anything more than authenticate over the network then use the local hard drive anyway. That depends on whether or not your users are setup with Network Home drives or are Mobile users that use the local hard drive instead. You might be able to find out from your SysAdmins whether or not Home folders are on a central server of some kind.
Network users authenticate and have a network home drives.
Is there anyway that User1 & User 2 could access the same event without doubling it up?
It seems like there would be a benefit to using an external Mac HD in this case as the permissions on that folder could easily be ignored. Then any user on that Mac will be able to see the iMovie Projects and Events saved onto that external HD and use them without doubling up the Events folder material. Unfortunately I don't think you can force iMovie to use a different folder for the Movies folder on an internal Hard drive. So an external HD might provide an easy workaround if that's possible. And better yet, it makes it all portable BETWEEN Macs if you need to setup on a different machine for some reason.
Thanks, thats was what i wanted to know. Although I dont think the department will be too keep on buying a minimum of 30 external hdd.
This only happens on certain machines. Any ideas why this would happen?
I don't want to blame this on how the machines are configured, but it may be the network users are seeing a Network Home folder in some cases when they are logged in, and in other cases they are seeing the local home folder on the internal Mac HD. I'm just guessing at this point. But it should be consistent across all the machines depending on if the network users is a Network Home user or a Mobile user.
I have double checked and all users are seeing their network home and no local version.
I just wondered if myabe an older version of iMovie(09) allowed the users to see all events even as local users or network. - bizarre really

How to setup for multiple users accessing same share?

Hi!
Recently picked up Mac Mini Server and have some configuration questions related to sharing files & information over the internet. Whenever possible, prefer to use the built-in features & tools, not 3rd party tools.
My setup & needs are this:
- Have folders & sub-folders with files to share.
- Wish to give individuals access to the shared folders, each with their own account (and access logging).
- Shared folder and files should be visible via web to authenticated users only (so no special client or setup is needed).
Right now, have added a Website via Server.app that points to the folder with files to share, and that works somewhat, but doesn't support individual user accounts separately?
Thought maybe to setup VPN but that seems like massive overkill for this (and is a pain in the butt for non-technical users to setup).
Editing httpd.conf for user support is a possibility, but seems /etc/apache2/httpd.conf only applies to the default web server (on port 80) not the one i set up in Server.app?
Can anyone recommend the best approach, given the above needs?

I have a related question. i created 2 websites/domains then i went to users and created 2 seperate "network" users then i went to ftp and selected each website and added only user A to site A and user B to site B. what's weird is that when i try to ftp using either of the users it seems to land on the same site. i looked at shared security for the folders and it only shows user a on site a folder and user b on site b folders. am i doing somehitng wrong or is this how it works in mountain lion server? i just want to give the domain owner ftp access so they can manage their files and only thier files. i also had to turn on open directory so that it would not create a local user but a network user. do i need to turn that off and just deal with having a bunch of local users as ftp user? i want to host multiple websites on the server and NO users remote on to server besides ftp.
edit 1: i only have 1 IP running on the server which i don't think it has any affect on this but thought i mention it :-)
edit 2: i just noticed one more thing that may help. i used filezilla to remote in using both users, one at a time. it seems to allow both users in but then it shows same directories. i then created a file using the one that was not supposed to have acces and it never sows up. but if i remote desktop to server i can see the new file in the correct folder. so it may have something to d o with the directory listing.

How to avoid multiple logins to same application

Hi, I am using APEX version 4.2.1.00.08. I have a function for AD LDAP authentication. The authentication scheme has Set Cookie Attributes, Cookie Name SESSION_COOKIE. I have been using this for years on previous versions of APEX. As part of the 4.2 upgrade I would like it if users did not have to log in many times a day to the same application. I email links to the application, but even if they are already logged in, it opens page 101 in a new browser window and requires a second login. The email contains a link like this https://server/apex/f?p=102:2:::NO::P2_RECORDID:200000:/ I have read multiple posts, for example "Access two applications with one log in" and http://apps2fusion.com/at/64-kr/413-maintaining-authentication-between-apex-applications but I am still clueless. If a user has logged in once and has an APEX session, is it possible to click the link in the email without having to log in again to the same application? There is an after submit process Set Username Cookie and Onload Before Header process Get Username Cookie. Do I need Set Session Cookie and Get Session Cookie processes? Thanks for your time.
Peter
FUNCTION used for AUTHENTICATION SCHEME
create or replace function ad_auth(
    p_username        in        varchar2,
    p_password        in        varchar2)
return boolean
is
    l_user            varchar2(256);
    l_ldap_server    varchar2(256)    := 'DC';
    l_domain        varchar2(256)    := 'servers';
    l_ldap_port        number            := 389;
    l_retval        pls_integer;
    l_session        dbms_ldap.session;
    l_cnt            number;
begin
    l_user            := p_username||'@'||l_domain;
    l_session        := dbms_ldap.init( l_ldap_server, l_ldap_port ); -- start session
    l_retval        := dbms_ldap.simple_bind_s( l_session, l_user, p_password ); -- auth as user
    l_retval        := dbms_ldap.unbind_s( l_session ); -- unbind
    return true;
exception when others then
    l_retval := dbms_ldap.unbind_s( l_session );
    return false;
end;

Hi Peter,
I'm not familiar with LDAP but from a security point of view, I think it is wise to force your users to login if you sending them a link to a protected site. Just in case they forward the email or sharing the same computer. Could you post some of the code that you use to produce the email? It maybe that you need to concatenate &SESSION. where the session id would be in the url
Regards,
Alistair

How do you share Aperture file across multiple users on same Mac?

How do you share Aperture file across multiple users on same Mac? Seems this should be a preferences choice.

When you share your library between users, you may run into permission and ownership problems, if both users are editing the Aperture library and not only reading it. To avoid that, it helps to put the Aperture library onto a separate disk or a separate partion of your hard drive. For s separate partition or disk you can enable the "ignore ownership on this volume" flag. Then all users can access the library as owners of this library.
You might try to put the aperture library into a shared folder on your mac, but that has caused problems recently, i.e. when the library also contains video files.
Regards
Léonie

How to lock multiple user for a transcation code at same time is der any tc

how to lock multiple user for a transcation code at same time is der any tc
suppose i hav 15 user and i want to lock 10 user for mm02 who can i to it

Basis can do a export and import transport, still if don't have connection between boxes.
or
check this
http://www.sap-basis-abap.com/abap/copy-program-variants-from-one-to-another.htm
a®

How to avoide multiple duplicate entries in adress book?

How to avoide multiple duplicate entries in adress book? I can add the same contact name and number more than twice and the phone isn't warning me at all!!! I's quite a heck for me.

not possible from inside AB AFAIK. but you can do the following. in finder open the folder /users/username/library/application support/address book/metdata. switch to the list mode and sort by date modified. quicklook the vcards at the top to see which ones they are.

ARCA Xtra - multiple user access to SQLite DB

Hi Guys,
I have having trouble with multiple users accessing a SQLite DB file from a projector. They can all open and browse the data through the projector fine, but if USER1 makes a change and clicks save, and then USER2 tries access the DB it causes USER2 to get a script error.
Is it possible to write a script which tells the user that the DB is being modified so please wait, rather than throwing them out of the projector with a script error
Thankyou

If you want multiple users to access a database then you would probably be better off using one designed for that purpose like MySQL.
But, if you are set on SQLite and if you can have multiple simultaneous connections which you seem to imply you can, then the best solution I can think of is to create a Class/Script that handles all the details of polling the database for availability and handles other issues like a progress dialogue box.
You have to treat the database as an asynchronous action - meaning you send it a query and at some latter time it sends a result back via a callback. Doing it this way greatly simplifies any database queries you want to make. As long as your queries are fairly simple like SELECT, INSERT, DELETE, etc. then the code is fairly straight forward.
Off the top of my head I wrote something to get you started. I have not tested this code but it does compile. The following is a Parent script that you would use to interface to your database in an asynchronous manner.
-- Asynchronus SQLite
property pDB -- instance of Arca xtra
property pTimeoutTime -- how long in milliseconds to ping database
property pPingTime -- time between database pings.
property RunningQuery -- Boolean. is a query running? true/false
property pTimeOb -- timout object for polling the database
property pCurOperation -- set of data for current query
property pPingCount -- how many times the current query has pinged the database
property pAlertBox -- a MIAW, LDM, or a Sprite that informs the user as to the progress of the query.
on new me
arcaregister([0000,000,0000])
pDB = xtra("arca").new()
Result = pDB.openDB(the moviepath & "ST_data")
if Result.errorMsg then
    alert("Error Opening Database" & return & pDB.explainError(Result.errorMsg))
    return void
end if
pTimeoutTime = 10000
pPingTime = 250
RunningQuery = false
pAlertBox = Sprite(1000) -- for example
return me
end new
on cleanup me
pDB.closeDB()
end cleanup
on executeSQL me, Query, CallbackOb, CallbackMethod, OptionalParameters
if RunningQuery then exit -- only allow one query at a time
RunningQuery = True
pCurOperation = [#Query:Query, #OptionalParameters:OptionalParameters, #CallbackOb:CallbackOb, #CallbackMethod:CallbackMethod]
pPingCount = 0
pTimeOb = timeout().new("QueryProcessor_"&me, 1, me, #processQuery) -- creating the timeout object here breaks the call stack, which is good.
end executeSQL
on processQuery me, TimeOb
Result = pDB.executeSQL(pCurOperation.Query, pCurOperation.OptionalParameters)
if Result.errorMsg then
    if Result.errorMsg = 5 then -- database is currently locked
      pPingCount = pPingCount + 1
      if pPingCount = 1 then -- then inform user there will be a delay.
        pAlertBox.setMessage("Waiting for database response.")
        pAlertBox.setProgress(0)
        pAlertBox.show()
        pTimeOb.period = pPingTime
        exit
      end if
      pAlertBox.setProgress((pPingCount * pPingTime / pTimeoutTime) * 100 )
      if pPingCount * pPingTime = pTimeoutTime then -- timed out
        alert("Query Timed out.")
      else
        exit -- try again in pPingTime time.
      end if
    else -- there is some sort of database error
      alert("Database Error: " & return & pDB.explainError(Result.errorMsg))
    end if
else -- no query errors
    call(pCurOperation.CallbackMethod, pCurOperation.CallbackOb, Result)
end if
-- if the code makes it this far then we are done and need to clean things up
if pTimeOb. objectP then
    pTimeOb.forget()
    pTimeOb = void
end if
pAlertBox.hide()
RunningQuery = false
end processQuery
on setTimeOutTime me, MilliSecs
pTimeoutTime = MilliSecs
end setTimeOutTime
on setPingTime me, MilliSecs
pPingTime = MilliSecs
end setPingTime
You then create an instance of this script on preparemovie.
-- Movie script
global gDB
on prepareMovie
gDB = script("Asynchronus SQLite").new()
if gDB.voidP then halt -- can not connect to the database
end
on stopMovie
gDB.cleanup()
end
Then it is simply a matter of sending your queries to the gDB object and it will send the results back to the callback handler and object that you specify. Here's a behavior that shows how simple this should be:
-- Sample DB Behavior
global gDB
on mouseUp me
Query = "select * from users"
gDB.executeSQL(Query, me, #setQueryResult) -- string, callback object, callback handler name
end
on setQueryResult me, Result -- this is the callback handler/method
put Result
end
I also suggest using a MIAW or a LDM or a set of sprites as a way to inform the user of any delays in processing a query. Check the code for pAlertBox to see how I use this idea to update a progress bar. Of course you will have to create the implementation.

Multiple User access in ATP

I am designing custom ATP for our client. Actually, this logic accesses batch classification data and the calculation logic also differs.
The concern that I have is if one user (say A) creates a sales order item and runs a successful Availability check and goes on to create second sales order item. simultaneously if another user (say B) comes to create new sales order item for same material. now the ATP quantity that second user gets should be less than the quantity confirmed by user A. But both the sales order have not been saved. so how do I block the quantities confirmed by A but yet not saved.
Is there any special method for multiple user access at runtime.

Thanks for ur reply. it was really helpful to gain more insights in my issue.
1. For performance-related reasons, the only time when it makes sense to set the material block with quantity transfer is when it is common for several users to work on the same material simultaneously. And in VA01 there are many parallel Sales order creation
2.You create a sales order for a material. During the availability check, this material is blocked. After the availability check is completed, the block is removed. The quantity reserved for this transaction is recorded in the blocking table. This information can be assessed by all others who are working with this material. If you save the order, the blocked entries are cancelled. this how Material block with quantity transfer in SD works.
The concern that I have now is how to get Blocking Tables for transaction VA01.

Allow multiple users access to iphoto

I would like to allow multiple users on same computer to access Iphoto files. What setting changes need to be made?
Thanks
mfandml

iPhoto: Sharing libraries among multiple users...
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1198

How to create multiple instance on same database

Hi ,
I would like to know how to create multiple instance on same database . I know that some people use database configuration assistant to do this but i could not figure out how they did it.
Any how if some one can help me with this and can give me links of this it would be great help for me.
Thank you for reading my problem and helping me !
Amil
please if possible mail me on [email protected]

How to create multiple instance?????Do you mean multiple instances on the same database, or multiple databases on the same machine ?
I m new to this field....
Willin to learn a lot about oracle....Then it wouldn't be bad reading a bit of Database Concepts

How to add multiple users to a role in ECC 6.0

How to add multiple users (say 1000) to a role in ECC 6.0?

Hi
You can actually add multiple users to a role using transaction SU01. From SU01, use the menu Environment->Mass Changes.
Here you can manually add the users, select them by address or authorisation data. Once you have your user list, you can then add or remove roles and/or profiles.
Secondly , You can use SU10 to do mass changes to multiple users including role assignments per logical systems
Also check the following link:
http://www.sap-img.com/bc021.htm
I hope this should do it
regards
Chen

How to avoid multiple users accessing same test data via parameterization in LR??

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for