How to enable Parallelism process in 10.1.0.5 database

Hi All,
We have oracle database 10.1.0.5 running in windows 2003 server.
I am trying to enable parallelism process in the database by including the following init parameters
PARALLEL_AUTOMATIC_TUNING
PARALLEL_SERVER
PARALLEL_MIN_SERVERS
PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS
But while i am trying to bring the database i am getting an error message like these parameter has been deprecated.
Could anyone help me to enable parallel process in 10g database.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Aruna

>
I am trying to enable parallelism process in the database by including the following init parameters
PARALLEL_AUTOMATIC_TUNING
PARALLEL_SERVER
PARALLEL_MIN_SERVERS
PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS
But while i am trying to bring the database i am getting an error message like these parameter has been deprecated.
>
PARALLEL_AUTOMATIC_TUNING is deprecated since 10g. It's always true now. PARALLEL_SERVER is related to OPS (prior to RAC) and long time deprecated.
You enable parallel query with an ALTER TABLE statement like
SQL> ALTER TABLE SALES PARALLEL;or with a hint like
SQL> select /*+ parallel(sales) */ * from sales;Kind regards
Uwe
http://uhesse.wordpress.com

Similar Messages

How to do parallel processing with dynamic internal table

Hi All,
I need to implement parallel processing that involves dynamically created internal tables. I tried doing so using RFC function modules (using starting new task and other such methods) but didn't get success this requires RFC enabled function modules and at the same time RFC enabled function modules do not allow generic data type (STANDARD TABLE) which is needed for passing dynamic internal tables. My exact requirement is as follows:
1. I've large chunk of data in two internal tables, one of them is formed dynamically and hence it's structure is not known at the time of coding.
2. This data has to be processed together to generate another internal table, whose structure is pre-defined. But this data processing is taking very long time as the number of records are close to a million.
3. I need to divide the dynamic internal table into (say) 1000 records each and pass to a function module and submit it to run in another task. Many such tasks will be executed in parallel.
4. The function module running in parallel can insert the processed data into a database table and the main program can access it from there.
Unfortunately, due to the limitation of not allowing generic data types in RFC, I'm unable to do this. Does anyone has any idea how to implement parallel processing using dynamic internal tables in these type of conditions.
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks and regards,
Ashin

try the below code...
DATA: w_subrc TYPE sy-subrc.
DATA: w_infty(5) TYPE c.
data: w_string type string.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <f1> TYPE table.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <f1_wa> TYPE ANY.
DATA: ref_tab TYPE REF TO data.
CONCATENATE 'P' infty INTO w_infty.
CREATE DATA ref_tab TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF (w_infty).
ASSIGN ref_tab->* TO <f1>.
* Create dynamic work area
CREATE DATA ref_tab TYPE (w_infty).
ASSIGN ref_tab->* TO <f1_wa>.
IF begda IS INITIAL.
    begda = '18000101'.
ENDIF.
IF endda IS INITIAL.
    endda = '99991231'.
ENDIF.
CALL FUNCTION 'HR_READ_INFOTYPE'
    EXPORTING
      pernr           = pernr
      infty           = infty
      begda           = '18000101'
      endda           = '99991231'
    IMPORTING
      subrc           = w_subrc
    TABLES
      infty_tab       = <f1>
    EXCEPTIONS
      infty_not_found = 1
      OTHERS          = 2.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    subrc = w_subrc.
ELSE.
ENDIF.

How to monitor parallel processing

Hi All,
I have 2 short questions:
1. When we want parallel processing, we can either use a parallel hing in the query, or alter a table to be parrallel. My question is what is the difference in the following 2 syntax:
a. ALTER TABLE myTable PARALLEL (DEGREE 3);
b. ALTER TABLE myTable PARALLEL 3;
Does the "DEGREE" keywor make any difference? or they both are same statements?
2. When we enable parallel processing, how can we monitor oracle processes, to confirm that a certain table is being actually processed by multiple threads of a singe user process?
An early response would be highly appreciated. Thanks.

user566817 wrote:
2. When we enable parallel processing, how can we monitor oracle processes, to confirm that a certain table is being actually processed by multiple threads of a singe user process?There are a number of virtual performance views that can be used. Please refer to the Oracle® Database Reference guide for details on these.
Had a look though my scripts and I have this one.. cannot recall if I "borrowed" it from somewhere and customised it and how old it is.. but it should (hopefully) still be mostly correct. It uses the virtual view v$px_process to determine the list of current PQ slaves in the pool and if they are used, map them to the Oracle session using them.
select distinct
        x.server_name           as "PQ",
        x.status                as "Status",
        x.sid                   as "OraPID",
        w2.sid                  as "Parent OraPID",
        v.osuser                as "O/S User",
        v.schemaname            as "User",
        w1.event                as "Child Wait",
        w2.event                as "Parent Wait"
from    v$px_process    x,
        v$lock          l,
        v$session       v,
        v$session_wait w1,
        v$session_wait w2
where   x.sid =! l.sid(+)
and     to_number (substr(x.server_name,3)) = l.id2(+)
and     x.sid = w1.sid(+)
and     l.sid = w2.sid(+)
and     x.sid = v.sid(+)
and     nvl(l.type,'PS') = 'PS'Use at own risk - best would be to verify that this is still valid using the Reference Guide. Or create similar ones using the available V$ views for the details you want to see (e.g. SQL statement executed per PQ, etc).

How to Enable Loopback Processing in W2K8

How to Enable Loopback Processing in Windows Server 2008. I am unable to find following:
In the Group Policy Microsoft Management Console (MMC), click Computer Configuration.
Locate Administrative Templates, click System, click
Group Policy, and then enable the Loopback Policy option.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/231287

> I don't understand why you would respond with the name of the setting,
> without describing the path to it. As far as I can tell, there is no
> search function in the Group Policy Management Editor to serach for the
> name. Is it too much to ask for the precise location?
That's why MSFT provides
http://gpsearch.azurewebsites.net/ :)
Martin
Mal ein
GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :))

Enable parallel processing

Hello,
I'm trying to enable parallel processing at the session level to force parallel processing on all DML and DDL statements regardless of object definition or lack of hints for DML. I thought the following would do the trick but it's not working. Wondering if I'm missing an instance setting. Thanks for any advice.
alter session force parallel ddl parallel 2;
alter session force parallel dml parallel 2;
SQL>show parameter parallel
NAME TYPE VALUE
fast_start_parallel_rollback string LOW
parallel_adaptive_multi_user boolean TRUE
parallel_automatic_tuning boolean FALSE
parallel_execution_message_size integer 2152
parallel_instance_group string
parallel_max_servers integer 160
parallel_min_percent integer 0
parallel_min_servers integer 0
parallel_server boolean FALSE
parallel_server_instances integer 1
parallel_threads_per_cpu integer 2
recovery_parallelism integer 0

I think I see the problem. The statement that I was looking to force parallel processing was an alter table add col with default value. Reading the documentation :) and it states that the alter table statement can only be parallelized for partitioned tables - the table in question is not partitioned. Documentation also states that even with DML parallel enabled the DML operation may still execute serially if there are no parallel hints or no tables with a parallel attribute or if restrictions on parallel operations are violated, i.e. Parallel DML operations cannot be done on tables with triggers.
The problem for me is that I'm dealing with a 3rd party vendor script that I do not want to modify it (very long, complex PL/SQL with dynamic SQL), among other things the script alters high volume tables with default values, before it alters the table it renames it as table_old and then re-creates as ctas from old, so enabling parallel at the object level is only viable if I modify the script. Same thing with hints.

How to retrieve parallel process info (aRFC)

Hi guys , I have a program that calls 2 RFC-enabled function modules and runs them in parallel. To my knowledge, each function modules is assigned with a unique task id when performing parallel processing.
My question is, how do I retrieve the information on the individual process such as task name and its duration?
say
call function 'Z_XXX' starting new task 'A' performing 'Z_FUNC' on end of task.....
and
call function 'Z_XXX' starting new task 'B' performing 'Z_FUNC' on end of task .....
then execute these functions and let it runs for a while, then how do i retrieve the task name of each process programmatically (A and B)?
sorry I'm still pretty new when it comes to ABAP
edit:-
somehow my previous question was removed along with replies
Edited by: afro100 on Aug 27, 2009 1:51 PM

Hello,
You can use following function module to get the id of transactional processing.
CALL FUNCTION 'ID_OF_BACKGROUNDTASK'
* EXPORTING
*   DEST          = ' '
* IMPORTING
*   TID           = --> collect ID from this varaible
*   FNUM          =
and for reteriving status you can use:
CALL FUNCTION 'STATUS_OF_BACKGROUNDTASK'
EXPORTING
    tid                 =
tables
    errortab            =
* EXCEPTIONS
*   COMMUNICATION       = 1
*   RECORDED            = 2
*   ROLLBACK            = 3
*   OTHERS              = 4
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
* MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
*         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
Hope this helps!
Thanks,
Augustin.

How to manage parallel processing for queue JMS/MDB?

Hello, we are developing a system in WebLogic Server 10g (10.3.0) that contains multiple JMS queues associated with each in an MDB. We need know how manage the parallelism of the message for each queue? for example:
Queue 1: up to 4 messages in parallel
Queue 2: up to 2 messages in parallel
Queue 3: up to 5 messages in parallel
Can also perform this configuration from the WebLogic Server Admin Console?
Thank you very much,
Lucas.

Thanks a lot Tom for the reply, I have read about the descriptor setting 'max-beans-in-free-pool' and I searched this concept at the Administration Console without success.
I suppose other way is create a “Session Pools” under the JMSServer, and then create a “Consumer” and define the setting “Messages Maximum”. One of the disadvantages is that “Session Pools” don’t support JTA, from the documentation:
+Session pools enable an application to process messages concurrently. Session pools are now used rarely, as they are not a required part of the J2EE specification, do not support JTA user transactions, and are largely superseded by message-driven beans (MDBs), which are a required part of the J2EE specification.+
I continue reading the MDB chapter of the performance and tuning guide in the documentation, thanks for any contribution to the topic.
Lucas.

How to achieve parallel processing in a single request?

Hi all,
I have a method in a Session EJB that will perform some business logic before it returns an answer to the client. The logic it will perform is to collect data from the applications database and two external systems, before sending all data to a third external system to get a response and send it back to the client. Each external system is quite slow so I would like to do all the collecting of data concurrent, parallel processing. How should I handle this? I'm not allowed to create my own threads in EJB's. Can I use MDB in some way? To the calling client this should be a synchronous call...
Greatfull for any suggestions
Cheers
Anders =)

Usually, the request is received by a component located in the web container, such as by an HTTP request (including Web Services). This component is able to start threads to allow parallel processing. Now, if for some reason the request arrives directly at EJB level and that you cannot move its receiver to web component, I think JMS is not a viable solution because you will switch to asynchronous processing and you have no way to make your EJB wait for the responses while preserving the client request (waiting implies programmatic life cycle management, which is forbidden in EJB container). Maybe a resource adapter (JCA) can bring a solution. A resource adapter acts as a datasource (a datasource is a specialization of a resource adapter) and thus it is a logical way to implement an adapter to an external, eventually non-J2EE, resource, as the name implies :) But I don't have enough knowledge in JCA to be sure of this.
Hope it helps.
Bruno Collet
http://www.practicalsoftwarearchitect.com

How to enable parallel port DC5800

This PC has header pins on the motherboard for a parallel port and I have connected a header cable but linux does not recognise that the computer has any parallel port hardware. There also seems to be no way to enable or disable the parallel port in the BIOS although it does have a setting for the printer port mode. The parallel support is described as "optional" on this PC, is it possible that the port cannot be enabled on this model?
Additional: I just installed Windows and it's the same. It really seems like the parallel port is disabled at BIOS level and cannot be activated.

869578 wrote:
Could you give me a sample query using by the above example query?
What kind of hints are needed in order to invoke multiple db link? As I said - this (distributed PQ across db links) is not supported. PQ needs to run inside a single database.
The only time that PQ runs across servers, is with an Oracle RAC database. But even then, PQ runs inside a single physical database.
If you want to use parallel processing across databases via db links, you need to code and implement that yourself.

How to implement parallel processing in oracle.

Hi Gurus,
In one our procedures we are calling 7 procedures internally. We want to execute them parallely insted of sequentially.
Please help me to resolve this issue.
thanks in advance...

Hi,
You have dbms_job package in Oracle 9i and dbms_scheduler from Oracle 10g.
Though you can run all these procedures parallel submitting via dbms_job, any exception/error out in any of these procedures need to be handled explicitly. Just be aware that once you submit these jobs, your application loses control of the execution and you have to build a whole infrastructure for rerun in case of an exception(log/exception tables, monitoring application to periodically check the exception tables, alerts from procedures in case of an exception and so on ...)
It's going to become more complex if you have any dependencies between these procedures.

Parallel process Before Remote client copy

i m going to perform remote client copy from production to sandbox how to enable parallel processing before that .
and its is hugh client and i want to do it fast can i start it in Foreground and if yes what parameter i have to set to what value to do it in foreground

Hi,
As far as i know there is no tcode where you can set parallel processing, you can just select remote cleit copy or local client copy this methods have parallel processing .
Regards,
Vamshi.

How to enable an monitor parallel processing in Oracle

Hi All,
I have 2 short questions:
1. When we want parallel processing, we can either use a parallel hint in the query, or alter a table to be parrallel. My question is what is the difference in the following 2 syntax:
a. ALTER TABLE myTable PARALLEL (DEGREE 3);
b. ALTER TABLE myTable PARALLEL 3;
Does the "DEGREE" keywor make any difference? or they both are same statements?
2. When we enable parallel processing, how can we monitor oracle processes, to confirm that a certain table is being actually processed by multiple threads of a singe user process?
An early response would be highly appreciated. Thanks.

1)The parallel clause lets you change the default degree of parallelism for queries and DML on the table.
2) PARALLEL DEGREE specifies the number of query server processes that can scan the table in parallel. Either specify a positive integer or DEFAULT which signifies to use the initialization parameter
check further http://mywebsys.com/oracle/syntax/view_syntax.php?id=23
Thanks

Parallel processing in large_pool

How can you set the parallel processes to use the large_pool instead of the shared_pool on an 11gR2 database? Pre 10g, parallel_automatic_tuning would set the large_pool for processing by paralel processes. Pparallel_automatic_tuning is deprecated since 10g. Also, I know that setting the PXuse_large_pool enables parallel processing in the large_pool. If PXuse_large_pool and parallel_automatic_tuning is set to FALSE and ASSM is disabled (sga_target=0), then what else can cause parallel processing to use large_pool?

Large Pool Sizing
Sizing the large pool can be complex. The large pool, if configured, must be at least 600 kilobytes in size. Usually, for most MTS applications, 600 is enough. However, if PQO (parallel query option) is also used in your Oracle8,Oracle8i, or Oracle9i environment, then the size of the large pool will increase dramatically. The V$SGASTAT dynamic performance view has a new column in Oracle8 called POOL. It is used to contain the pool area where that particular type of object is being stored. By issuing a summation select against the V$SGASTAT view, a DBA can quickly determine the size of the large pool area currently being used.
SELECT name, SUM(bytes) FROM V$SGASTAT WHERE pool='LARGE POOL' GROUP BY ROLLUP(name);
The above select should be used when an “ORA-04031:Unable to allocate 16084 bytes of shared memory (‘large pool’, ‘unknown object’, ‘large pool hea’, ‘PX large pool’)” error is received during operation with a large pool configured (the number of bytes specified may differ). When the above select is run, the resulting summary number of bytes will indicate the current size of the pool and show how close you are to your maximum, as specified in the initialization parameter LARGE_POOL_SIZE. Generally, increasing the large_pool by up to 100 percent will eliminate the ORA-04031 errors.
In an undocumented (as of this writing) bug in 8.1.7.1 if you have large complex SQL statements, such as a 15 table join, and nothing to force large pool usage you can get excessive CPU times, ORA-04031 and ORA_01037 errors. If you get ORA-04031, or ORA-01037 errors and aren't using the large pool try turning on parallel query by setting the parallel query processes to minimum values to force use of the large pool.

BI 7.0 parallel processing of queries in a web application

Hi,
I'm currently having problems with a web application / web template with 10 data providers (different queries). When executing the web application the 10 queries are executed sequentially. Since each query takes about 30 sec., the complete execution time exceeds 300 seconds which is not satisfactory.
Is there any way to enable parallel processing?
Thanx in advance,
Patrick

Hello Patrick
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/41c97a30-0901-0010-61a5-d7abc01410ee
/thread/351419 [original link is broken]
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/media/uuid/ff5186ad-0701-0010-1aa1-e11f4f3f2f68
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/2b79ba90-0201-0010-1b9a-fa13a8f38127
Thanks
Chandran

Parallel Processing Issue : call function starting new task

Hi
I am using the parallel processing functionality using the call function new task destination in group default Performing on end of task inside a loop ( i am splitting the internal table )
However when i am debugging the code, i am able to see the function module( it opens a new session in debugging ) , and i see that new task is started after the RFC Function module is executed .
How is this parallel processing ? I mean the new task starts after control returns back to main program , after the execution of the RFC FM.
I thought the idea was to have the same FM executing in multi threads. So that time is saved.

Thanks for the answers.
There were too many complications in the 'call function in new task ' option.
So we are trying it with the job submit option. So we are splitting up the data into smaller tables and submiting it with this statement : Submit 'prog' with selection-table 's_sel' via job 'job' and return .
Thanks

How to enable Parallelism process in 10.1.0.5 database

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for