How to tune this Bex report
The report show display the unique units price for the same cust # and material
Example:
Sales Doc # Item # Cust # SBU SPL Material Unit price
100 10 1763 10 10200 CX00-23343 1.0
101 10 1763 10 10200 CX00-23343 1.0
102 10 1763 10 10200 CX00-23343 1.5
We need to show below in the report for the above example:
Sales Doc # Item # Cust # SBU SPL Material Unit price
100 10 1763 10 10200 CX00-23343 1.0
101 10 1763 10 10200 CX00-23343 1.5
Please give your much needed inputs
Thanks
Vishal
Hi Arun,
This is how it is.. and in this case we need to ignore the row with sales doc 102. We need to display the unique units price for the same cust # and material#.
so if have
Doc # Item # Cust # SBU SPL Material Unit price
101 10 1763 10 10200 CX00-23343 1.0
102 10 1763 10 10200 CX00-23343 1.5
We need to display only
Doc # Item # Cust # SBU SPL Material Unit price
101 10 1763 10 10200 CX00-23343 1.0
Thanks
Vishal
Similar Messages
-
How to tune this query for the improve performance ?
Hi All,
How to tune this query for the improve performance ?
select a.claim_number,a.pay_cd,a.claim_occurrence_number,
case
when sum(case
when a.payment_status_cd ='0'
then a.payment_est_amt
else 0
end
)=0
then 0
else (sum(case
when a.payment_status_cd='0'and a.payment_est_amt > 0
then a.payment_est_amt
else 0
end)
- sum(case
when a.payment_status_cd<>'0'
then a.payment_amt
else 0
end))
end as estimate
from ins_claim_payment a
where a.as_of_date between '31-jan-03' and '30-aug-06'
and ( a.data_source = '25' or (a.data_source between '27' and '29'))
and substr(a.pay_cd,1,1) IN ('2','3','4','8','9')
group by a.claim_number, a.pay_cd, a.claim_occurrence_number
Thank you,
MckaMcka
As well as EXPLAIN PLAN, let us know what proportion of rows are visited by this query. It may be that it is not using a full table scan when it should (or vice versa).
And of course we'd need to know what indexes are available, and how selective they are for the predicated you have in this query ...
Regards Nigel -
What this SQL did is to generate a report like how many rows for each tp_stts when ims_toms_msge_type='TOMS NEW' (or 'TOMS CNCLO'). also, its corresponding total number for each ims_toms_msge_type.
Here is the sample:
Rownum H1 TP_STTS COUNT IMS_TOMS_MSGE_TYPE H FILTERTYPE
1 Trades Block Key Data Error 594 TOMS NEW A MSL
2 Allocation Data Error 334 TOMS NEW A MSL
3 Manual Processing Required 29 TOMS NEW A MSL
4 Manual Removal No Processing Required 67 TOMS NEW A MSL
5 Waiting For Authorization 2 TOMS NEW A MSL
6 Auto NAK 19764 TOMS NEW B SLS
7 Validated 165023 TOMS NEW B SLS
8 GRAND TOTAL 185813 TOMS NEW H MSL
9 Cancel Auto NAK 37 TOMS CNCLO X MSL
10 Manual Processing Required 114 TOMS CNCLO X MSL
11 Manually Processed 278 TOMS CNCLO X MSL
12 CANCEL GRAND TOTAL 429 TOMS CNCLO Z MSLSQL statement as below:
SELECT ROWNUM, MSGS.* FROM (with FTMReport as (
select tp_stts, ims_toms_msge_type, count(*) count from ims_trde, ims_toms_msge
where ( IMS_TRDE.PRCSG_GRP_ID = 5 ) AND ( IMS_TRDE.IMS_TRDE_RCPT_DTTM >= TO_DATE('12/01/2009 00:00', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI') AND IMS_TRDE.IMS_TRDE_RCPT_DTTM <= (TO_DATE('12/28/2009 23:59', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI')) ) AND (IMS_TRDE.GRS_TRX_TYPE NOT IN ('INJECTION','WITHDRAWAL','PAYMENT') OR IMS_TRDE.GRS_TRX_TYPE IS NULL) AND (IMS_TRDE.SSC_INVST_TYPE != 'FC' OR IMS_TRDE.SSC_INVST_TYPE IS NULL) AND (IMS_TRDE.SERVICE_TYPE='FS' OR IMS_TRDE.SERVICE_TYPE='CO') AND 1=1
and IMS_TRDE.SERVICE_TYPE='FS' and 1=1 and ims_trde.ims_trde_oid = ims_toms_msge.ims_trde_oid
group by tp_stts, ims_toms_msge_type
select 'GRAND TOTAL' H1, null tp_stts, sum(Count) count , ims_toms_msge_type ,'H', 'MSL' FilterType
from FTMReport where ims_toms_msge_type in ('TOMS NEW') group by ims_toms_msge_type
union
select 'CANCEL GRAND TOTAL' H1, null tp_stts, sum(Count) count, ims_toms_msge_type ,'Z', 'MSL' FilterType
from FTMReport where ims_toms_msge_type in ('TOMS CNCLO') group by ims_toms_msge_type
union
select DECODE(rownum, 1, 'Trades') H1, tp_stts, count, ims_toms_msge_type , 'A' , 'MSL' FilterType
from FTMReport where ims_toms_msge_type in ('TOMS NEW') and tp_stts not in ('Validated','Auto NAK','Manual NAK')
union
select ' ' H1, tp_stts, count, ims_toms_msge_type , 'B' , 'SLS' FilterType
from FTMReport where ims_toms_msge_type in ('TOMS NEW') and tp_stts in ('Validated','Auto NAK','Manual NAK')
union
select DECODE(rownum, 1, 'Cancel') H1, tp_stts, count, ims_toms_msge_type , 'X' , 'MSL' FilterType
from FTMReport where ims_toms_msge_type in ('TOMS CNCLO') order by 5,6
) MSGS;Explain plan as below:
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 193 | 12738 | 32 |
| 1 | COUNT | | | | |
| 2 | VIEW | | 193 | 12738 | 32 |
| 4 | TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION | | | | |
| 3 | RECURSIVE EXECUTION | SYS_LE_4_0 | | | |
| 0 | INSERT STATEMENT | | 61 | 4575 | 9264 |
| 1 | LOAD AS SELECT | | | | |
| 2 | SORT GROUP BY | | 61 | 4575 | 9264 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1604 | 117K| 9251 |
|* 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| IMS_TRDE | 1603 | 80150 | 6045 |
|* 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IMS_TRDE_INDX4 | 539K| | 3917 |
|* 6 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IMS_TOMS_MSGE_INDX1 | 1 | 25 | 2 |
| 5 | SORT UNIQUE | | 193 | 8831 | 30 |
| 6 | UNION-ALL | | | | |
| 7 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 5 | 115 | 6 |
|* 8 | VIEW | | 61 | 1403 | 2 |
| 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D660F_B198D56F | 61 | 2074 | 2 |
| 10 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 5 | 115 | 6 |
|* 11 | VIEW | | 61 | 1403 | 2 |
| 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D660F_B198D56F | 61 | 2074 | 2 |
| 13 | COUNT | | | | |
|* 14 | VIEW | | 61 | 2867 | 2 |
| 15 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D660F_B198D56F | 61 | 2074 | 2 |
|* 16 | VIEW | | 61 | 2867 | 2 |
| 17 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D660F_B198D56F | 61 | 2074 | 2 |
| 18 | COUNT | | | | |
|* 19 | VIEW | | 61 | 2867 | 2 |
| 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D660F_B198D56F | 61 | 2074 | 2 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
4 - filter(("IMS_TRDE"."GRS_TRX_TYPE"<>'INJECTION' AND "IMS_TRDE"."GRS_TRX_TYPE"<>'WITHDRAWAL'
AND "IMS_TRDE"."GRS_TRX_TYPE"<>'PAYMENT' OR "IMS_TRDE"."GRS_TRX_TYPE" IS NULL) AND
("IMS_TRDE"."SSC_INVST_TYPE"<>'FC' OR "IMS_TRDE"."SSC_INVST_TYPE" IS NULL))
5 - access("IMS_TRDE"."IMS_TRDE_RCPT_DTTM">=TO_DATE(' 2009-12-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd
hh24:mi:ss') AND "IMS_TRDE"."PRCSG_GRP_ID"=5 AND "IMS_TRDE"."SERVICE_TYPE"='FS' AND
"IMS_TRDE"."IMS_TRDE_RCPT_DTTM"<=TO_DATE(' 2009-12-28 23:59:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
filter("IMS_TRDE"."PRCSG_GRP_ID"=5 AND "IMS_TRDE"."SERVICE_TYPE"='FS')
6 - access("IMS_TRDE"."IMS_TRDE_OID"="IMS_TOMS_MSGE"."IMS_TRDE_OID")
8 - filter("FTMREPORT"."IMS_TOMS_MSGE_TYPE"='TOMS NEW')
11 - filter("FTMREPORT"."IMS_TOMS_MSGE_TYPE"='TOMS CNCLO')
14 - filter("FTMREPORT"."IMS_TOMS_MSGE_TYPE"='TOMS NEW' AND "FTMREPORT"."TP_STTS"<>'Validated'
AND "FTMREPORT"."TP_STTS"<>'Auto NAK' AND "FTMREPORT"."TP_STTS"<>'Manual NAK')
16 - filter("FTMREPORT"."IMS_TOMS_MSGE_TYPE"='TOMS NEW' AND ("FTMREPORT"."TP_STTS"='Auto NAK' OR
"FTMREPORT"."TP_STTS"='Manual NAK' OR "FTMREPORT"."TP_STTS"='Validated'))
19 - filter("FTMREPORT"."IMS_TOMS_MSGE_TYPE"='TOMS CNCLO')
Note: cpu costing is offCould you guys tell me what is wrong with this sql and how to tune it?
Is there any way to replace the UNION? Is using UNION a good idea?
Can I use DECODE or CASE WHEN to simplify it? How?
Also, could you help explain why there is SYS_LE_4_0, SYS_TEMP_0FD9D660F_B198D56F temporary segment? Is it caused by with FTMReport as ?
Thanks
Edited by: PhoenixBai on Dec 31, 2009 9:58 AM
Edited by: PhoenixBai on Dec 31, 2009 12:08 PM
Edited by: PhoenixBai on Dec 31, 2009 12:17 PMI consider using GROUP BY ROLLUP together with DECODE, CASE WHEN, but haven`t come out with a working sql yet:-(Some sample data to work with would have been much helpful. But we dont get that most of the time :(
I came up with this.
select case when ims_toms_msge_type = 'TOMS NEW' then
case when grouping(tp_stts) = 1 then 'GRAND TOTAL'
when tp_stts not in ('Validated','Auto NAK','Manual NAK') then 'Trades'
end
when ims_toms_msge_type = 'TOMS CNCLO' then
case when grouping(tp_stts) = 1 then 'CANCEL GRAND TOTAL'
when tp_stts in ('Validated','Auto NAK','Manual NAK') then 'Cancel'
end
end h1,
tp_stts,
count(*) count,
ims_toms_msge_type,
case when ims_toms_msge_type = 'TOMS NEW' then
case when grouping(tp_stts) = 1 then 'H'
when tp_stts not in ('Validated','Auto NAK','Manual NAK') then 'A'
end
when ims_toms_msge_type = 'TOMS CNCLO' then
case when grouping(tp_stts) = 1 then 'Z'
when tp_stts in ('Validated','Auto NAK','Manual NAK') then 'B'
end
end flag,
'MSL' FilterType
from ims_trde,
ims_toms_msge
where IMS_TRDE.PRCSG_GRP_ID = 5
AND IMS_TRDE.IMS_TRDE_RCPT_DTTM >= TO_DATE('12/01/2009 00:00', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI')
AND IMS_TRDE.IMS_TRDE_RCPT_DTTM <= TO_DATE('12/28/2009 23:59', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI')
AND (IMS_TRDE.GRS_TRX_TYPE NOT IN ('INJECTION','WITHDRAWAL','PAYMENT')
OR IMS_TRDE.GRS_TRX_TYPE IS NULL)
AND (IMS_TRDE.SSC_INVST_TYPE != 'FC'
OR IMS_TRDE.SSC_INVST_TYPE IS NULL)
AND (IMS_TRDE.SERVICE_TYPE = 'FS'
OR IMS_TRDE.SERVICE_TYPE = 'CO')
AND 1=1
and IMS_TRDE.SERVICE_TYPE = 'FS'
and 1=1
and ims_trde.ims_trde_oid = ims_toms_msge.ims_trde_oid
group by rollup(ims_toms_msge_type, tp_stts)Not sure if this code works. Because i dint have the table or the data to test it. So if it has some error just fix it and give it a try. Do post the kind of output it gives. So that we can see if we can work with this solution. -
How to assign a Bex report to the user role
Hi Expert
in the Excel, when you open a query, the system will display history, faviourate, infoarea, role button on the left side of the popup screen. if you click the role button, you can see the user authorized Bex report. now I have created a Bex report and I want to assign it to the user role.
how to do that?
does anyboday know which transcation or setting can solve this problem?
thank you in advance!Hi,
You need to add the object S_RS_COMP:
S_RS_COMP: Authorizations for using different components for the query definition. This authorization object is very important for reporting
The authorization object S_RS_COMP restricts query component activities. For example, it restricts if someone can create queries, change queries, or execute queries. You can restrict query creation, change, and execution by the InfoArea and InfoCube. If your company has one InfoCube for sales information and another for financial data, you can restrict a user to only those queries written for the sales InfoCube or the financial InfoCube.
You could also use S_RS_COMP if you want to protect by query name. For example, you have an InfoCube for sales data. Every sales manager needs access to this InfoCube. However, sales managers in different lines of business are not allowed to execute the same query.
Please visit:
http://www.*********************/bw_security/bw_security_auth_obj_2.htm
to know more about BW Objects.
Hope it helps.
Please award points if it is useful.
Thanks & Regards,
Santosh -
How to design this complex report
I'm getting crazy======
my mdb file is like this.
For example, "PointName" has many pointname, like C1, C2, C3..........,[they are vertical tunnels].
For every point/tunnel, like C1,
we mearsure it every few days, and get the displacement with the depth.
Point C1 ---- 2014/2/19 ---- depth: -1 ---- it's displacement is 0.4
And for the report, I want every point have a crosstab and graph.
How to do this report, many thanks!!!Hi, Jamie
I think I haven't say it clear. The final report is all C1 in one crosstab, all C2 in one crosstab.......this is the key.
I followed as you say, it shows, there are many c1 and c2, and the crosstab is wrong.
Then I tried to use subreport
it shows
I want one C1 and one C2 and so on, and all C1's data in one crosstab and all C2's data in one crosstab.
That's it.
A'm I clear? If not, please tell me. Thanks. -
How to run a bex report in backround
All,
Could anybody tell me how to schedule a bacround job to run a bex report. It would be great if i could email the results also,
I appreciate any help with points,
Regards,
MikeA reporting agent (RSREP TC) is replaced by broadcaster in 7.0, but what both do is execute the query in background and put it in cache and you try to access the cache when you execute the web template which is techinically a query.
thanks.
Wond -
How to tune this SQL (takes long time to come up with results)
Dear all,
I have sum SQL which takes long time ... can any one help me to tune this.... thank You
SELECT SUM (n_amount)
FROM (SELECT DECODE (v_payment_type,
'D', n_amount,
'C', -n_amount
) n_amount, v_vou_no
FROM vouch_det a, temp_global_temp b
WHERE a.v_vou_no = TO_CHAR (b.n_column2)
AND b.n_column1 = :b5
AND b.v_column1 IN (:b4, :b3)
AND v_desc IN (SELECT v_trans_source_code
FROM benefit_trans_source
WHERE v_income_tax_app = :b6)
AND v_lob_code = DECODE (:b1, :b2, v_lob_code, :b1)
UNION ALL
SELECT DECODE (v_payment_type,
'D', n_amount,
'C', -n_amount
* -1 AS n_amount,
v_vou_no
FROM vouch_details a, temp_global_temp b
WHERE a.v_vou_no = TO_CHAR (b.n_column2)
AND b.n_column1 = :b5
AND b.v_column1 IN (:b12, :b11, :b10, :b9, :b8, :b7)
AND v_desc IN (SELECT v_trans_source_code
FROM benefit_trans_source
WHERE income_tax_app = :b6)
AND v_lob_code = DECODE (:b1, :b2, v_lob_code, :b1));
Thank You.....Thanks a lot,
i did change the SQL it works fine but slows down my main query.... actually my main query is calling a function which does the sum......
here is the query.....?
select A.* from (SELECT a.n_agent_no, a.v_agent_code, a.n_channel_no, v_iden_no, a.n_cust_ref_no, a.v_agent_type, a.v_company_code,
a.v_company_branch, a.v_it_no, bfn_get_agent_name(a.n_agent_no) agentname,
PKG_AGE__TAX.GET_TAX_AMT(:P_FROM_DATE,:P_TO_DATE,:P_LOB_CODE,A.N_AGENT_NO) comm,
c.v_ird_region
FROM agent_master a, agent_lob b, agency_region c
WHERE a.n_agent_no = b.n_agent_no
AND a.v_agency_region = c.v_agency_region
AND :p_lob_code = DECODE(:p_lob_code,'ALL', 'ALL',b.v_line_of_business)
AND :p_channel_no = DECODE(:p_channel_no,1000, 1000,a.n_channel_no)
AND :p_agency_group = DECODE(:p_agency_group,'ALL', 'ALL',c.v_ird_region)
group by a.n_agent_no, a.v_agent_code, a.n_channel_no, v_iden_no, a.n_cust_ref_no, a.v_agent_type, a.v_company_code, a.v_company_branch, a.v_it_no, bfn_get_agent_name(a.n_agent_no) ,
BPG_AGENCY_GEN_ACL_TAX.BFN_GET_TAX_AMOUNT(:P_FROM_DATE,:P_TO_DATE,:P_LOB_CODE,A.N_AGENT_NO),
c.v_ird_region
ORDER BY c.v_ird_region, a.v_agent_code DESC)
A
WHERE (COMM < :P_VAL_IND OR COMM >=:P_VAL_IND1);
Any idea to make this faster....
Thank You... -
How to execute BW-Bex reports from SRM
Hi
Anyone know if there is an easy way of execute BW Bex reports directly from the SRM interface? Or is the easiest way to have the users start the Analyzer seperatly.
We are running:
SRM 4.0 (webb interface)
BW 3.5
Thanks and regards
PontusHi
Thanks for your reply.
I can run that TC from the BW but not from SRM. It just says that TC does not exist in SRM.
Best Regards
Pontus -
HOw to achieve this at report/query level
Hi Experts
Please update me how can i achieve this at query level
Lets Consider Data in my Cube
Dept_id--Date--
Qty
-101.01.20093-----
-101.01.20095-----
-101.01.20098-----
-101.01.20091-----
-101.01.20099-----
That is how data is avaliable in my cube
When i run the report the output is displayed as
Dept_id--Date--
Qty
-101.01.200926-----
That is what it actually do...it will sumirises into one record.....
BUT
My requirment is the query result should be ....with out summarisation
Dept_id--Date--
Qty
-101.01.20093-----
-101.01.20095-----
-101.01.20098-----
-101.01.20091-----
-101.01.20099-----
Please update me is there any setting i can make at query levelHi,
By default data will be aggregated in Query.
How come data available in Cube at different aggregation level...? due to request no or some other characteristic which is unique for each record...??
If some other characteristic available, make it available that characteristic in rows to get desired result.
Srini -
Hi,
Im trying to select the latest set of data from a table using a simple query for inserting into a new table.
Details are given below.
There are no indices for the table. Its taking around 18 sec.
Pls advice on how to proceed so that I can bring down this time.
Query:
SELECT
FROM
M_UNDR M
WHERE
M.M_DATE = (SELECT MAX(M_DATE) FROM M_UNDR M1)
AND
M.M_TIME =
SELECT MAX(M_TIME) FROM M_UNDR M2 WHERE M2.M_DATE = M.M_DATE
AND
M.U_TYPE NOT IN ('USD', 'GBP', 'EUR');
SQL> select count(1) from m_undr;
COUNT(1)
2695446
SQL>
Version:
SQL> select banner from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.3.0 Production
TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
Explain plan
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 95 | 19060 |
| 1 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 95 | 12882 |
| 2 | VIEW | VW_SQ_1 | 508 | 11176 | 6608 |
| 3 | HASH GROUP BY | | 508 | 10668 | 6608 |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| M_UNDR | 2392K| 47M| 6186 |
| 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | M_UNDR | 5594 | 398K| 6274 |
| 6 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 8 | |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| M_UNDR | 2392K| 18M| 6178 |
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME TYPE VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.2.0.3
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 200
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
SQL> sho parameter DB_FILE_MULTI
NAME TYPE VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count integer 16
SQL> show parameter db_block_size
NAME TYPE VALUE
db_block_size integer 8192
SQL> show parameter cursor_sharing
NAME TYPE VALUE
cursor_sharing string EXACT
Trace:
SQL> set autotrace traceonly arraysize 100
SQL> SELECT
2 *
3 FROM
4 M_UNDR M
5 WHERE
6 M.M_DATE = (SELECT MAX(M_DATE) FROM M_UNDR M1)
7 AND
8 M.M_TIME =
9 (
10 SELECT MAX(M_TIME) FROM M_UNDR M2 WHERE M2.M_DATE = M.M_DATE
11 )
12 AND
13 M.U_TYPE NOT IN ('USD', 'GBP', 'EUR');
239 rows selected.
Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=ALL_ROWS (Cost=19060 Card=1 Bytes
=95)
1 0 HASH JOIN (Cost=12882 Card=1 Bytes=95)
2 1 VIEW OF 'VW_SQ_1' (VIEW) (Cost=6608 Card=508 Bytes=11176
3 2 HASH (GROUP BY) (Cost=6608 Card=508 Bytes=10668)
4 3 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'M_UNDR' (TABLE) (Cos
t=6186 Card=2392724 Bytes=50247204)
5 1 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'M_UNDR' (TABLE) (Cost=62
74 Card=5594 Bytes=408362)
6 5 SORT (AGGREGATE)
7 6 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'M_UNDR' (TABLE) (Cos
t=6178 Card=2392724 Bytes=19141792)
Statistics
1 recursive calls
0 db block gets
91479 consistent gets
4830 physical reads
0 redo size
15457 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
359 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
239 rows processed
SQL> disconnect
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor(null, null, 'ALLSTATS LAST'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID 0br4mzjgj63dw, child number 0
SELECT /*+ gather_plan_statistics */ * FROM M_UNDR M WHERE M.M_DATE = (SELECT MAX(M_DATE) FROM
M_UNDR M1) AND M.M_TIME = ( SELECT MAX(M_TIME) FROM M_UNDR M2 WHERE M2.M_DATE = M.M_DATE )
AND M.U_TYPE NOT IN ('USD', 'GBP', 'EUR')
Plan hash value: 1220141218
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers | OMem | 1Mem | Used-Mem |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 1 | 239 |00:00:06.94 | 91479 | 1114K| 1114K| 1209K (0)|
| 2 | VIEW | VW_SQ_1 | 1 | 508 | 607 |00:00:04.06 | 30492 | | | |
| 3 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 508 | 607 |00:00:04.06 | 30492 | | | |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| M_UNDR | 1 | 2392K| 2695K|00:00:00.01 | 30492 | | | |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | M_UNDR | 1 | 5594 | 5497 |00:00:02.81 | 60987 | | | |
| 6 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 1 | 1 |00:00:01.20 | 30492 | | | |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| M_UNDR | 1 | 2392K| 2695K|00:00:00.01 | 30492 | | | |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - access("M"."M_TIME"="VW_COL_1" AND "M_DATE"="M"."M_DATE")
5 - filter(("M"."U_TYPE"<>'USD' AND "M"."U_TYPE"<>'GBP' AND "M"."U_TYPE"<>'EUR' AND "M"."M_DATE"=))
26 rows selected.I have tried using rank as below. Didnt find any improvement.
select * from
SELECT
m.*,
rank() over (order by m_date desc, m_time desc) rnk
FROM
M_UNDR M
WHERE
M.U_TYPE NOT IN ('USD', 'GBP', 'EUR')
where rnk = 1Thanks in advanceHi,
creating index on m_date and m_time did have gr8 impact on the plan.
Query is completing in 2 sec now.
Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 73 | 6234 |
1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | M_UNDR | 2 | 146 | 51 |
2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IND_M_UNDR | 2 | | 49 |
3 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 13 | |
4 | FIRST ROW | | 5683 | 73879 | 6 |
5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN (MIN/MAX)| IND_M_UNDR | 5683 | 73879 | 6 |
6 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 8 | |
7 | INDEX FULL SCAN (MIN/MAX) | IND_M_UNDR | 2392K| 18M| |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Thanks for the help. Will check if there is any serious impact on insert. -
How to tune this update statement?
Hello,
I have to solve the following task:
Update every row in table A which has an appropriate row in table B and log what you have done in a log-table.
It is possible that there are more than one fitting rows in table A for a row in table B.
My first approach is looping over the table B and doing an update of table A for every entry in table B.
This works and looks like this:
Table A:
PK number (This is the primary key of this table)
KEY number
Table B:
KEY_OLD number
KEY_NEW number
Log table:
PK number
KEY_OLD number
KEY_NEW number
declare
TYPE PK_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF number INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
v_tab_PK PK_TAB_TYPE;
v_empty_tab_PK PK_TAB_TYPE;
begin
for v_rec in (select * from table_B) loop
v_tab_PK := v_empty_tab_PK; /* clearing the array */
update table_A
set KEY = v_rec.KEY_NEW
where (KEY = v_rec.KEY_OLD)
returning PK bulk collect into v_tab_PK;
if (v_tab_PK.count > 0) then
for i in v_tab_PK.first..v_tab_PK.last loop
insert into TMP_TAB_LOG(PK, KEY_OLD, KEY_NEW)
values (v_tab_PK(i), v_rec.KEY_OLD, v_rec.KEY_NEW);
end loop;
end if;
end loop;
end;Because the table B can have up to 500.000 entries (and the table A has even more entries) this solution will cause many update-statements.
So I am looking for a solution which has better performance.
My second approach was using an correlated update and looks like this:
declare
TYPE PK_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF number INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
v_tab_PK PK_TAB_TYPE;
v_empty_tab_PK PK_TAB_TYPE;
v_tab_NewKey PK_TAB_TYPE;
begin
v_tab_PK := v_empty_tab_PK; /* clear the arrays */
v_tab_NewKey := v_empty_tab_PK;
update table_A a
set KEY = (select KEY_NEW from table_B where (KEY_OLD = a.KEY))
where exists (select 'x' as OK
from table_B
where (KEY_OLD = a.KEY)
returning PK, KEY bulk collect into v_tab_PK, v_tab_NewKey;
if (v_tab_PK.count > 0) then
for i in v_tab_PK.first..v_tab_PK.last loop
insert into TMP_TAB_LOG_DUB(PK, KEY_OLD, KEY_NEW)
values (v_tab_PK(i), null, v_tab_NewKey(i));
end loop;
end if;
end;Now I have only one update statement.
The only thing missing in this second approach is the old KEY before the update in the log table.
But I have no idea how to get the old value.
Is there a possibility to modify this second approach to get the old value of the KEY before the update to write it in the log-table?
And now I need your help:
What is the best way to get a performant solution for my task?
Every help appreciated.
Regards HartmutBelow is a script you can run in another testing schema to do the update with logging..... I have created the tables (A and B) with primary key constraints defined...
create table table_a(pk number primary key
, key number);
create table table_b(key_old number primary key
, key_new number);
create table TMP_TAB_LOG_DUB(pk number primary key
, key_old number
, key_new number);
---------insert test data
insert into table_a values(1,2);
insert into table_a values(2,2);
insert into table_a values(3,2);
insert into table_a values(11,1);
insert into table_a values(12,1);
insert into table_a values(13,1);
insert into table_a values(21,4);
insert into table_a values(22,4);
insert into table_a values(23,4);
commit;
insert into table_b values(1,3);
insert into table_b values(4,2);
commit;
----- insert to log
insert into TMP_TAB_LOG_DUB(PK, KEY_OLD, KEY_NEW)
select a.pk
, a.key as key_old
, b.key_new as key_new
from table_a a
join table_b b on a.key = b.key_old;
----- update table_a
update(select a.pk
, a.key as key_old
, b.key_new as key_new
from table_a a
join table_b b on a.key = b.key_old)
set key_old = key_new;
commit; -
Need help understanding how to resolve this XMLP Report Definition error
Getting error on only 1 database but is of course is the one for an important deal. Going to Reporting Tools>XML Publisher>Report Definition and querying for Report Name HRS_INT_LET we get errors.
File associated with template definition is not found in the database. (235,77)
File object associated with template defintiion is not found in the database, therefore the report and/or template definition is not valid. Please check consistency of objects.
Next error message:
Error in PeopleCode ScrollSelect processing. (2,213) PSXPRPTDEFN_WRK.FUNCLIB.FieldFormula Name:LoadTemplateDefn PCPC:37323 Statement:542
Called from:PSXPRPTDEFN_WRK.FUNCLIB.FieldFormula Name:LoadReportDefn Statement:601
Called from:PSXPRPTDEFN_WRK.FUNCLIB.FieldFormula Name:SelectReportDefn Statement:740
Called from:PSXPRPTDEFN.GBL.PostBuild Statement:36
A SQL error occurred during processing of the PeopleCode ScrollSelect (or ScrollSelectNew, RowScrollSelect, RowScrollSelectNew) built-in function.
This error may have been described by a preceding message.
Examine the error messages and the PeopleCode program containing the ScrollSelect call to determine the cause of the error.
Edited by: user702257 on Feb 3, 2010 8:24 AMHey did anyone reply or have a similar problem.. ??
but with 3 Error Messages, the first one is:
1st Error:
SQL error.stmt#:651 Error Position:2010 Return:904 - ORA-00904: "CUSTMERNAME":invalid identifier
2nd Error:
SELECT T1, T2, ETC........
3rd Error:
Error in PeopleCode ScrollSelect processing. (2,213) At INV.TRANS.FieldChange trans_qry PCPC:1719 Statement: 67
A SQL error ocurred during processing of the PeopleCode ScrollSelect (or ScrollSelectNew, RowScrollSelect, RowScrollSelectNow) built-in function.
This error may have been described by preceding message.
Examine the error message and the PeopleCode program containing the ScrollSelect call to determine the cause of the error.
does any one know or had this error in particular?
Thanks
George -
Hi all,
Can anyone suggests me how to speed up the following query? What index should I create?
The Query
SELECT *
FROM SCHEDULE_EMP
WHERE EMP_NO = :b2
AND :b1 BETWEEN START_DATE AND END_DATE
Table Structure
EMP_NO NOT NULL VARCHAR2(10)
START_DATE NOT NULL DATE
END_DATE DATE
SAT NUMBER(2)
SUN NUMBER(2)
MON NUMBER(2)
TUE NUMBER(2)
WED NUMBER(2)
THU NUMBER(2)
FRI NUMBER(2)
Thanks in advance.Hello
It really helps with this kind of task if you can post the execution plan, and also list what existing indexes you have on the table, volumes of data etc.
In this case though, with the limited information I would suggest creating an index on emp_no and start_date. Is there a reason why end_date doesn't have a not null constraint? If nulls are valid in end_date, I would have thought you could need to modify the where clause to take that into account. Unfortunately I don't have a database to test on at the mo but I would think you would need to do something like:
SELECT
FROM
SCHEDULE_EMP
WHERE
EMP_NO = :b2
AND
start_date <= :b1
AND
end_date >= :b1
AND
end_date IS NOT NULL
...or this one if you want to consider nulls in end_date.....
SELECT
FROM
SCHEDULE_EMP
WHERE
EMP_NO = :b2
AND
start_date <= :b1
AND
end_date >= :b1
AND
end_date IS NOT NULL
OR
start_date <= :b1
AND
end_date IS NULL
)If you only want to consider rows with a value in end_date, including it in the index may well prove to be a good move but you would need to try it out.
HTH
David -
HI all
This is my query when i run this query its take to much of time to complete and it takes CPU load if 96%
This is my query
SELECT order_number, cust_po_number, line_id, order_line_upi,
order_item_number
FROM (SELECT oh.order_number order_number,
oh.cust_po_number cust_po_number,
ol.line_id line_id, ol.attribute2 order_line_upi,
ol.attribute20 order_item_number
FROM hz_org_contacts hzoc,
hz_relationships hzr,
hz_cust_account_roles hzcr,
oe_order_headers_all oh,
oe_order_lines_all ol,
mtl_system_items_b msi
--,hr_operating_units hou
hr_all_organization_units hou
WHERE hzoc.attribute1 = p_client_cust_ref
AND hzoc.party_relationship_id = hzr.relationship_id
AND hzr.relationship_code = 'CONTACT_OF'
AND hzr.subject_type = 'PERSON'
AND hzr.party_id = hzcr.party_id
AND hzcr.cust_account_role_id = oh.sold_to_contact_id
AND oh.header_id = ol.header_id
AND oh.sold_to_org_id = hzcr.cust_account_id
AND msi.segment1 LIKE '%' || p_product || '%'
AND msi.inventory_item_id = ol.inventory_item_id
AND msi.organization_id = ol.ship_from_org_id
AND ol.attribute2 is not null
AND oh.org_id = ol.org_id
AND hou.organization_id = oh.org_id
AND hou.NAME = g_operating_unit
ORDER BY oh.creation_date DESC);
Thanks & Regards
Srikkanth.MYou need to give us more information.
Please read this thread to discover what else you should post:
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting -
Hi all expert out there,
I am using Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production With the Partitioning, Real Application Clusters, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options.
I have this ERP 11i query took 3-4hours to execute. can anyone help to have a look at the Query so make it more faster? I am already out of my idea of solving this. Kindly helpzzz...
SELECT
/*+ first_rows(1)*/
hou.name "OU" ,-- e.g. Seagate Technology USOP1 ,
mc.description,
oel.ordered_item "Product Part Number",
oeh.order_number "Order Num",
hp.party_name "Bill To Cust Name",
hcsu.location "Ship To Cust Num",
oel.line_number || '.' || oel.shipment_number "Order Line Num",
ft.nls_territory "Ship To Country",
mc.segment7 "designapplication",
ccm.formattedcapacity||'GB' "Capacity",
oel.attribute1 "Order Category",
oel.Subinventory "Subinventory",
to_char(oel.actual_shipment_date,'MM/DD/YYYY DY') "Shipment Date",
NVL(oel.shipped_quantity,0) "Net Units"
FROM
oe_order_headers_all oeh
,oe_order_lines_all oel
,apps.hz_parties hp
,apps.hz_cust_accounts hca
,apps.hz_cust_site_uses_all hcsu
,apps.hz_cust_acct_sites_all hcas
, apps.seaeng_ccfamilymodelinfo ccm
,apps.hz_party_sites hps
,apps.fnd_territories ft
,apps.hz_locations hl
,apps.hr_organization_units hou
,apps.mtl_parameters mp
,apps.mtl_item_categories mic
,apps.mtl_categories_b mc
,apps.fnd_lookup_values flv
WHERE
oeh.header_id = oel.header_id
AND oel.flow_status_code = 'CLOSED'
AND oeh.invoice_to_org_id = hcsu.site_use_id
AND hl.country = ft.territory_code
AND hps.location_id = hl.location_id
AND hcas.party_site_id = hps.party_site_id
AND hcsu.cust_acct_site_id = hcas.cust_acct_site_id
AND hcas.cust_account_id = hca.cust_account_id
AND hca.party_id = hp.party_id
AND oeh.org_id = hou.organization_id
AND oel.ship_from_org_id = mp.organization_id
AND oel.inventory_item_id = mic.inventory_item_id
AND mic.category_id = mc.category_id
AND mic.category_set_id = 4
AND mc.description = ccm.stmodelnumber
AND flv.lookup_code = hca.sales_channel_code
AND flv.lookup_type = 'SALES_CHANNEL'
AND mc.segment7 IN ('PSG','ESG','NSG')
AND flv.lookup_code NOT IN ('RTL','AD-RTL','EU')
AND oel.attribute1 IN ('NB','NBEOL','NBSEA')
AND oel.subinventory IN ('KFGI','AFGI','SFGIF','FGIF')
AND hou.organization_id = 189
AND trunc(oel.actual_shipment_date) between TO_DATE('01-Jan-2009','DD-MON-YYYY') and TO_DATE('31-JAN-2009','DD-MON-YYYY')
regards,
Lygine
Edited by: user8989062 on Jun 7, 2010 6:39 PM5) The TKPROF output for this statement looks like the following:
SELECT
/*+ first_rows(1)*/
hou.name "OU" ,-- e.g. Seagate Technology USOP1 ,
mc.description,
oel.ordered_item "Product Part Number",
oeh.order_number "Order Num",
hp.party_name "Bill To Cust Name",
hcsu.location "Ship To Cust Num",
oel.line_number || '.' || oel.shipment_number "Order Line Num",
ft.nls_territory "Ship To Country",
mc.segment7 "designapplication",
ccm.formattedcapacity||'GB' "Capacity",
oel.attribute1 "Order Category",
oel.Subinventory "Subinventory",
to_char(oel.actual_shipment_date,'MM/DD/YYYY DY') "Shipment Date",
NVL(oel.shipped_quantity,0) "Net Units"
FROM
oe_order_headers_all oeh
,oe_order_lines_all oel
,apps.hz_parties hp
,apps.hz_cust_accounts hca
,apps.hz_cust_site_uses_all hcsu
,apps.hz_cust_acct_sites_all hcas
, apps.seaeng_ccfamilymodelinfo ccm
,apps.hz_party_sites hps
,apps.fnd_territories ft
,apps.hz_locations hl
,apps.hr_organization_units hou
,apps.mtl_parameters mp
,apps.mtl_item_categories mic
,apps.mtl_categories_b mc
,apps.fnd_lookup_values flv
WHERE
oeh.header_id = oel.header_id
AND oel.flow_status_code = 'CLOSED'
AND oeh.invoice_to_org_id = hcsu.site_use_id
AND hl.country = ft.territory_code
AND hps.location_id = hl.location_id
AND hcas.party_site_id = hps.party_site_id
AND hcsu.cust_acct_site_id = hcas.cust_acct_site_id
AND hcas.cust_account_id = hca.cust_account_id
AND hca.party_id = hp.party_id
AND oeh.org_id = hou.organization_id
AND oel.ship_from_org_id = mp.organization_id
AND oel.inventory_item_id = mic.inventory_item_id
AND mic.category_id = mc.category_id
AND mic.category_set_id = 4
AND mc.description = ccm.stmodelnumber
AND flv.lookup_code = hca.sales_channel_code
AND flv.lookup_type = 'SALES_CHANNEL'
AND mc.segment7 IN ('PSG','ESG','NSG')
AND flv.lookup_code NOT IN ('RTL','AD-RTL','EU')
AND oel.attribute1 IN ('NB','NBEOL','NBSEA')
AND oel.subinventory IN ('KFGI','AFGI','SFGIF','FGIF')
AND hou.organization_id = 189
AND trunc(oel.actual_shipment_date) between TO_DATE('01-Jan-2009','DD-MON-YYYY') and TO_DATE('31-JAN-2009','DD-MON-YYYY')
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.79 0.79 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 7 22.23 240.85 19781 536082 0 592
total 9 23.02 241.64 19781 536082 0 592
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: FIRST_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173
Rows Row Source Operation
592 NESTED LOOPS (cr=536082 pr=19781 pw=0 time=240822989 us)
592 NESTED LOOPS (cr=534885 pr=19776 pw=0 time=239960969 us)
592 NESTED LOOPS (cr=533688 pr=19776 pw=0 time=239902332 us)
594 NESTED LOOPS (cr=532493 pr=19776 pw=0 time=239811721 us)
594 NESTED LOOPS (cr=531892 pr=19776 pw=0 time=239794703 us)
594 NESTED LOOPS (cr=530693 pr=19772 pw=0 time=239325284 us)
594 NESTED LOOPS (cr=529498 pr=19770 pw=0 time=239152940 us)
594 NESTED LOOPS (cr=527709 pr=19766 pw=0 time=236850676 us)
594 NESTED LOOPS (cr=525920 pr=19764 pw=0 time=235640068 us)
2990 NESTED LOOPS (cr=516943 pr=19688 pw=0 time=195144282 us)
2990 NESTED LOOPS (cr=516936 pr=19688 pw=0 time=195120297 us)
2990 NESTED LOOPS (cr=510806 pr=19682 pw=0 time=194678671 us)
3000 HASH JOIN (cr=504799 pr=19669 pw=0 time=193829763 us)
3000 NESTED LOOPS (cr=472280 pr=360 pw=0 time=49218087 us)
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=1029 pr=34 pw=0 time=1745829 us)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_TL (cr=424 pr=25 pw=0 time=1361442 us)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNTS_TL_PK (cr=423 pr=25 pw=0 time=1361397 us)(object id 44637)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS (cr=605 pr=9 pw=0 time=384370 us)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HR_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_PK (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=27 us)(object id 43498)
3000 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID OE_ORDER_LINES_ALL (cr=471251 pr=326 pw=0 time=47466249 us)
156922 INDEX RANGE SCAN OE_ORDER_LINES_N20 (cr=420 pr=7 pw=0 time=787919 us)(object id 37005064)
263469 TABLE ACCESS FULL MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES (cr=32519 pr=19309 pw=0 time=144242743 us)
2990 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID MTL_CATEGORIES_B (cr=6007 pr=13 pw=0 time=843569 us)
3000 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN MTL_CATEGORIES_B_U1 (cr=3007 pr=2 pw=0 time=162636 us)(object id 37199)
2990 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SEAENG_CCFAMILYMODELINFO (cr=6130 pr=6 pw=0 time=437784 us)
2990 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SEAENG_CCFAMILYMODELINFO_U1 (cr=2997 pr=0 pw=0 time=52872 us)(object id 35838918)
2990 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN MTL_PARAMETERS_U1 (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=16332 us)(object id 37657)
594 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID OE_ORDER_HEADERS_ALL (cr=8977 pr=76 pw=0 time=40491633 us)
2990 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN OE_ORDER_HEADERS_U1 (cr=5987 pr=45 pw=0 time=2504442 us)(object id 41952)
594 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HZ_CUST_SITE_USES_ALL (cr=1789 pr=2 pw=0 time=1208576 us)
594 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HZ_CUST_SITE_USES_U1 (cr=1195 pr=1 pw=0 time=105934 us)(object id 25124976)
594 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HZ_CUST_ACCT_SITES_ALL (cr=1789 pr=4 pw=0 time=2300224 us)
594 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HZ_CUST_ACCT_SITES_U1 (cr=1195 pr=2 pw=0 time=152238 us)(object id 25124996)
594 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HZ_PARTY_SITES (cr=1195 pr=2 pw=0 time=170875 us)
594 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HZ_PARTY_SITES_U1 (cr=601 pr=1 pw=0 time=104550 us)(object id 25124993)
594 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HZ_LOCATIONS (cr=1199 pr=4 pw=0 time=467329 us)
594 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HZ_LOCATIONS_U1 (cr=601 pr=0 pw=0 time=57749 us)(object id 25124992)
594 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_TERRITORIES (cr=601 pr=0 pw=0 time=15562 us)
594 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_TERRITORIES_U1 (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=6492 us)(object id 33083)
592 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS (cr=1195 pr=0 pw=0 time=88925 us)
594 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 (cr=601 pr=0 pw=0 time=27607 us)(object id 81600)
592 INDEX RANGE SCAN FND_LOOKUP_VALUES_U1 (cr=1197 pr=0 pw=0 time=56714 us)(object id 32878)
592 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HZ_PARTIES (cr=1197 pr=5 pw=0 time=860140 us)
592 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HZ_PARTIES_U1 (cr=599 pr=0 pw=0 time=51136 us)(object id 25126074)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 7 0.00 0.00
row cache lock 1 0.00 0.00
gc current block 2-way 24112 0.00 19.28
gc cr grant 2-way 406 0.00 0.19
db file sequential read 441 0.09 14.11
gc cr block 2-way 284 0.00 0.23
gc cr block busy 147 0.19 9.59
gc current block congested 2 0.00 0.00
gc cr multi block request 13079 0.00 3.98
SQL*Net message from client 7 0.27 1.87
gc cr failure 39 0.00 0.02
cr request retry 39 0.98 38.27
SQL*Net more data to client 12 0.00 0.00
db file scattered read 2446 0.13 132.58
gc cr disk read 5 0.00 0.00
********************************************************************************6) The DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR output:
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor(null, null, 'ALLSTATS LAST'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID b8pfhfxscqn1m, child number 0
SELECT /*+ gather_plan_statistics */ hou.name "OU" ,-- e.g. Seagate Technology USOP1 , mc.descript
oeh.order_number "Order Num", hp.party_name "Bill To Cust Name", hcsu.location "Ship To Cust Num",
Num", ft.nls_territory "Ship To Country", mc.segment7 "designapplication", ccm.formattedcapacity
oel.Subinventory "Subinventory", to_char(oel.actual_shipment_date,'MM/DD/YYYY DY') "Shipment Date",
oe_order_headers_all oeh ,oe_order_lines_all oel ,apps.hz_parties hp ,apps.hz_cust
,apps.hz_cust_acct_sites_all hcas , apps.seaeng_ccfamilymodelinfo ccm ,apps.hz_party_sites hps
,apps.hr_organization_units hou ,apps.mtl_paramete
Plan hash value: 414863479
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers | Reads | O
| 1 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 1 | 592 |00:02:25.13 | 535K| 57267 | |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 1 | 592 |00:02:24.22 | 533K| 57185 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 1 | 592 |00:02:24.15 | 532K| 57183 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 1 | 594 |00:02:24.00 | 531K| 57171 |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 1 | 594 |00:02:23.98 | 530K| 57170 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 1 | 594 |00:02:23.49 | 529K| 57129 |
| 7 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 1 | 594 |00:02:23.08 | 528K| 57096 |
| 8 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 1 | 594 |00:02:22.51 | 526K| 57031 | |
| 9 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 1 | 594 |00:02:21.79 | 524K| 56968 | |
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 1 | 2990 |00:02:09.65 | 515K| 55703 |
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 1 | 2990 |00:02:09.62 | 515K| 55703 |
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 1 | 2990 |00:02:08.47 | 509K| 55599 |
|* 13 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 2 | 3000 |00:02:07.88 | 503K| 55516 | 974K
| 14 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2 | 3000 |00:01:39.07 | 471K| 23025 |
| 15 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 1 | 1 |00:00:00.01 | 4 | 0 |
| 16 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_TL | 1 | 1 | 1 |00:00
|* 17 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNTS_TL_PK | 1 | 1 | 1 |00:00:00.0
|* 18 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS | 1 | 1 | 1 |00:00:
|* 19 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | HR_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_PK | 1 | 1 | 1 |00:00:00.01
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | OE_ORDER_LINES_ALL | 1 | 2 | 3000 |00:01
|* 21 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OE_ORDER_LINES_N20 | 1 | 47575 | 156K|00:00:01.76 | 420
|* 22 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES | 1 | 96977 | 263K|00:00:28.49
|* 23 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MTL_CATEGORIES_B | 3000 | 1 | 2990 |00:00:0
|* 24 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | MTL_CATEGORIES_B_U1 | 3000 | 1 | 3000 |00:00:00.21
| 25 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | SEAENG_CCFAMILYMODELINFO | 2990 | 1 | 2990 |
|* 26 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | SEAENG_CCFAMILYMODELINFO_U1 | 2990 | 1 | 2990 |00:00:
|* 27 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | MTL_PARAMETERS_U1 | 2990 | 1 | 2990 |00:00:00.02 |
|* 28 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | OE_ORDER_HEADERS_ALL | 2990 | 1 | 594 |00:00:
|* 29 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | OE_ORDER_HEADERS_U1 | 2990 | 1 | 2990 |00:00:04.29 |
| 30 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | HZ_CUST_SITE_USES_ALL | 594 | 1 | 594 |00:00:
|* 31 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | HZ_CUST_SITE_USES_U1 | 594 | 1 | 594 |00:00:00.31 |
| 32 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | HZ_CUST_ACCT_SITES_ALL | 594 | 1 | 594 |00:00:
|* 33 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | HZ_CUST_ACCT_SITES_U1 | 594 | 1 | 594 |00:00:00.23 |
| 34 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | HZ_PARTY_SITES | 594 | 1 | 594 |00:00:0
|* 35 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | HZ_PARTY_SITES_U1 | 594 | 1 | 594 |00:00:00.17 | 601
| 36 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | HZ_LOCATIONS | 594 | 1 | 594 |00:00:00.4
|* 37 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | HZ_LOCATIONS_U1 | 594 | 1 | 594 |00:00:00.17 |
| 38 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | FND_TERRITORIES | 594 | 1 | 594 |00:00:00
|* 39 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | FND_TERRITORIES_U1 | 594 | 1 | 594 |00:00:00.02
|* 40 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS | 594 | 1 | 592 |00:00:0
|* 41 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 | 594 | 1 | 594 |00:00:00.04 |
|* 42 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | FND_LOOKUP_VALUES_U1 | 592 | 1 | 592 |00:00:00.06 |
| 43 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | HZ_PARTIES | 592 | 1 | 592 |00:00:00.91 |
|* 44 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | HZ_PARTIES_U1 | 592 | 1 | 592 |00:00:00.40 | 599
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
13 - access("OEL"."INVENTORY_ITEM_ID"="MIC"."INVENTORY_ITEM_ID")
17 - access("HAOTL"."ORGANIZATION_ID"=189 AND "HAOTL"."LANGUAGE"=USERENV('LANG'))
filter(DECODE("HR_SECURITY"."VIEW_ALL"(),'Y','TRUE',"HR_SECURITY"."SHOW_RECORD"('HR_ALL_ORGAN
18 - filter("HAO"."BUSINESS_GROUP_ID"=DECODE("HR_GENERAL"."GET_XBG_PROFILE"(),'Y',"HAO"."BUSINESS_
19 - access("HAO"."ORGANIZATION_ID"=189)
20 - filter(("OEL"."FLOW_STATUS_CODE"='CLOSED' AND INTERNAL_FUNCTION("OEL"."ATTRIBUTE1") AND INTER
21 - access("OEL"."SYS_NC00342$">=TO_DATE(' 2009-01-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "O
'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
22 - filter("MIC"."CATEGORY_SET_ID"=4)
23 - filter(("MC"."DESCRIPTION" IS NOT NULL AND INTERNAL_FUNCTION("MC"."SEGMENT7")))
24 - access("MIC"."CATEGORY_ID"="MC"."CATEGORY_ID")
26 - access("MC"."DESCRIPTION"="CCM"."STMODELNUMBER")
27 - access("OEL"."SHIP_FROM_ORG_ID"="MP"."ORGANIZATION_ID")
28 - filter("OEH"."ORG_ID"=189)
29 - access("OEH"."HEADER_ID"="OEL"."HEADER_ID")
31 - access("OEH"."INVOICE_TO_ORG_ID"="HCSU"."SITE_USE_ID")
33 - access("HCSU"."CUST_ACCT_SITE_ID"="HCAS"."CUST_ACCT_SITE_ID")
35 - access("HCAS"."PARTY_SITE_ID"="HPS"."PARTY_SITE_ID")
37 - access("HPS"."LOCATION_ID"="HL"."LOCATION_ID")
39 - access("HL"."COUNTRY"="FT"."TERRITORY_CODE")
40 - filter(("HCA"."SALES_CHANNEL_CODE"<>'RTL' AND "HCA"."SALES_CHANNEL_CODE"<>'AD-RTL' AND "HCA".
41 - access("HCAS"."CUST_ACCOUNT_ID"="HCA"."CUST_ACCOUNT_ID")
42 - access("FLV"."LOOKUP_TYPE"='SALES_CHANNEL' AND "FLV"."LOOKUP_CODE"="HCA"."SALES_CHANNEL_CODE"
filter(("FLV"."LOOKUP_CODE"<>'RTL' AND "FLV"."LOOKUP_CODE"<>'AD-RTL' AND "FLV"."LOOKUP_CODE"<
44 - access("HCA"."PARTY_ID"="HP"."PARTY_ID")
90 rows selected.
{code} &nbs
Maybe you are looking for
-
Dear SAP PM Gurus, I am new user in SAP PM facing problem in T_Code IW21 for the field "Person Responsible" can't find where the customisation to be done for possible entries for this field. Thank You in Advance. Regards Rajesh Pagar 9890413929.
-
BT Billing wrong amounts due to charging for wrong...
Hello All. This my first post. Sad to say it is a complaint. I will try and be as brief as possible. In March of 2009 I decided to migrate to BT for Broad Band. I already had line and calls from them. I decided on a package deal as follows. "Package
-
Including images in JAR for Swing Application
I am using a couple of images in a Swing application. When I create the JAR file I include all the images. The JAR executes fine but the images are missing. When I put the images in the same directory as the JAR file the images are properly displayed
-
Debugging source code in Web-Inf
Dear All Java Expert, I'm using Forte 3.0 and debugging source code for different web application folder. example ..\webapps\APPS1 and ..\webapps\APP2. Ok, my problem is i was unable to 'share and debug' same servlet file over 2 web application. Exam
-
Hi, the problem is that I cannot see an image through either the view finder or on the LCD screen. I have changed the batteries and also used a new SD card. Nothing shows up on the FAQ's about this problem! any one?