How to use order by within Group by clause

Hi All,
I need a help as to how should i use the Order by clause so that the data should be in order with respect to one column, and at the same time whole data is grouped by some other column...like
Select RaceNo,Venue,FP,BP from Race group by RaceNo
Here I want to order by FP in ascending order for each group. When i am using it , whole order is changing.
Can anybody suggest me how to use order by clause that would apply to each group of data.
Thanks .

order by clause should be used at the last in any query.......but in group by clause u can't use use that becoz u group according to column then no ordering is needed there......if u want to filter something then u can use having clause and later if u need to arrange then u can use order by clause.........
i hope this eg.l gives u some clarification....
e.g
select deptno,count(empno)
from dept
group by deptno
having count(empno) > 10
order by deptno

Similar Messages

Need help on how to use conference facility within adobe connect

I need some help on how to use conference facility within adobe connect?

I'd recommend you start here: Getting Started with Adobe Connect - Adobe Connect User Community

How to use order by in stored procedure base block?

How to use order by in stored procedure base block? I need to change order by dynamically

Use SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('BLOCK_NAME',ORDER_BY,'COLUMN_NAME1, COLUMN_NAME2');

How to use Special value set with Column clause to display addtional column

hi
can anyone tell me
How to use Special value set with Column clause to display addtional column
how can i use FND POPID and with COLUMN clause ?

Dear Yaseen,
To get the value in formula cumulative,after you have created the formula for that particular key figure,go to edit and click on tab "calculations".
In that select overall result as 'count all values not equal to zero' and single result as 'count all values not equal to zero' .
And mark the cumulative check box underneath.
I hope you get the desired result and please do me favour .
Sumit goomber

OBIEE: Incorrect SQL - with count function uses ORDER BY instead GROUP BY

I made a basic report that is a client count; I want to know how many clients the company have.
But, when I run this report, OBIEE generates a ORDER BY sentence, instead a GROUP BY. Remember that I'm using count function, that is a agregation.
The SQL generated was:
select 'N0' as c1,
count(*) as c2
from
(select distinct T1416.CLIENT_INTER_KEY as c1
from
(select *
from prd.D_SERVICE where SOURCE_SYS in ('ARBOR','PPB') and DW_SERV_ST_ID in (100000003,100000009)) T1836,
(select *
from prd.D_CLIENT) T1416,
(select *
from prd.D_CUSTOMER_ACCOUNT where SOURCE_SYS In ('ARBOR','PPB')) T1515
where ( T1416.DW_CLIENT_ID = T1515.DW_CLIENT_ID and T1515.DW_CUST_ACCT_ID = T1836.DW_CUST_ACCT_ID and T1836.MSISDN = '917330340' )
) D1
order by c1
The error that I receive is:
"Query Status: Query Failed: [nQSError: 16001] ODBC error state: S1000 code: -1005018 message: [Sybase][ODBC Driver][Adaptive Server Anywhere]Illegal ORDER BY item Order Item: 'N0',
-- (opt_OrderBy.cxx 429) .
[nQSError: 16011] ODBC error occurred while executing SQLExtendedFetch to retrieve the results of a SQL statement."
If I substitute ORDER BY with GROUP BY and test it in Sybase, Ithe query runs without any problem.
select 'N0' as c1,
count(*) as c2
from
(select distinct T1416.CLIENT_INTER_KEY as c1
from
(select *
from prd.D_SERVICE where SOURCE_SYS in ('ARBOR','PPB') and DW_SERV_ST_ID in (100000003,100000009)) T1836,
(select *
from prd.D_CLIENT) T1416,
(select *
from prd.D_CUSTOMER_ACCOUNT where SOURCE_SYS In ('ARBOR','PPB')) T1515
where ( T1416.DW_CLIENT_ID = T1515.DW_CLIENT_ID and T1515.DW_CUST_ACCT_ID = T1836.DW_CUST_ACCT_ID and T1836.MSISDN = '917330340' )
) D1
group by c1
Do you know why OBIEE generates this SQL??? Why uses, with a aggregation function, a ORDER BY and not a GROUP BY? How can I resolve this problem???
Regards,
Susana Figueiredo

Verify your repository design and make sure that you have defined count aggregate on fact column. You would also need to define the content level of each dimension in fact table.

How to use other cols in group by which does not need grouping.

HI,
saleshistory table has sales record of each empoly, day wise.
that is saleshistory has more than one record of empid in it.
empcode is number(9,0) and empname is varchar2(200), sales number(10,5),empid is number(10,0)
select empid, sum(sales), max(empname), max(empcode) from saleshistory
group by empid ;
or
select empid, sum(sales), empname,empcode from saleshistory
group by empid ,empname,empcode ;
i want to find the total amout of sales done by each employee with empid,empname,empcode in select list.
1) please tel me which method good which i should follow or is there any other good way to get it.
yours sincerely
Edited by: 944768 on Apr 20, 2013 5:14 AM
Edited by: 944768 on Apr 20, 2013 5:15 AM
Edited by: 944768 on Apr 20, 2013 5:15 AM
Edited by: 944768 on Apr 20, 2013 5:16 AM
Edited by: 944768 on Apr 20, 2013 5:34 AM
Edited by: 944768 on Apr 20, 2013 7:08 AM

Hi,
This sounds like a job for the analytic SUM function.
Since you didn't post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for your own table, I can't test with your table. I'll show how to do his using the scott.emp table instead. In scott.emp, there can any number of rows with the same job, just as in your table there can be any number of rows for the same empid.
SELECT       job
,       sal
,       SUM (sal) OVER (PARTITION BY job)     AS total_sal
FROM       scott.emp
ORDER BY job
;Output:
JOB              SAL TOTAL_SAL
ANALYST         3000       6000
ANALYST         3000       6000
CLERK           1300       4150
CLERK            950       4150
CLERK            800       4150
CLERK           1100       4150
MANAGER         2850       8275
MANAGER         2975       8275
MANAGER         2450       8275
PRESIDENT       5000       5000
SALESMAN        1500       5600
SALESMAN        1250       5600
SALESMAN        1250       5600
SALESMAN        1600       5600Most aggregate functions (like SUM) have analytic counterparts which can get the same results without collapsing the result set down to one row per group. The PARTITION BY clause of analytic functions corresponds to the GROUP BY clause used with aggregate functions.
944768 wrote:
... when we used GTT in Stored proc (SP) is it necessary to truncate it at the begining of sp , if one truncate can it create any harm, as SP is used by many people at the same time.This seems to be a completely separate question. Most of your message involved grouping and the SUM function; it has nothing to do with Global Temporary Tables or stored procedures. You might have an application that uses a stored procedure and a global temporary table, and which also uses groupng and the SUM function, but that doesn't mean you hve a problem that involves all of them. If the stored procedure problem has anything to do with the grouping problem, explain it. If it is a completely separate problem, then start aompletely separate thread or it (and explain it).
I hope this answers your question.
If not, point out where the query above is producing the wrong reslts, and explain, using specific examples, how you get the correct results in those places.
If you want to use your own table, post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, relevant columns only), and the results you want from that data.
Always say what version of Oracle you're using (e.g. 11.2.0.2.0).
See the forum FAQ {message:id=9360002}

How to use "Order by" clause dynamically on LOV values in 10g r2 forms

Hi ,
I have following requirement,please guide me.
1 Create a List Of Values with 2 fields, Code and Description
2. Do not use order by clause in record Group Query
3. Attach this LOV to a field in Form
4. When user invokes the LOV user will see two fields in LOV with header as Code and Description
5. Now when user clicks on Column Header “Code” then LOV should be sorted on Code
6. And if User clicks on Column Header “Description” then LOV should be sorted on Description
Thanks in Advance.

Kindly post this problem in this forum ->
[Forms Forum|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=82]
And, close this thread by marked it as answered. ;)
Regards.
Satyaki De.

How to display column specified in group by clause only once?

I've a result coming out of a sql query that uses group by clause as follows:
2008-07-25 19" LCD Screen 5
2008-07-25 HP Printer     4
2008-08-01 Hanging Files 11
2008-08-01 Stapler     3
2008-08-15 19" LCD Screen 5
2008-08-15 Hanging Files 14
What should I do in the query to display the result set as follows:
2008-07-25 19" LCD Screen 5
     HP Printer     4
2008-08-01 Hanging Files 11
     Stapler     3
2008-08-15 19" LCD Screen 5
Hanging Files 14

Hi,
That's a display issue, and display issues are best handled by the front end.
What is your frone end?
If it's SQL*Plus, you can use the BREAK command.
For example:
BREAK ON deptno     NODUPLICATES
SELECT       deptno
,       ename
FROM       scott.emp
ORDER BY deptno
,            ename
;Output:
`   DEPTNO ENAME
        10 CLARK
           KING
           MILLER
        20 ADAMS
           FORD
           JONES
           SCOTT
           SMITH
        30 ALLEN
           BLAKE
           JAMES
           MARTIN
           TURNER
           WARDNote that deptno is never NULL: KING and MILLER have deptno=10; but it doesn't show in the display, because it's the same as the deptno on the previous row.
NODUPLICATES is actually the default, so you could just say
BREAK ON deptnoThe BREAK command remains in force until you end the session (or un-do it, e.g. with "CLEAR BREAKS")
Remember to issue the BREAK command at least once in the session before running the query.
To get the same results in SQL, use the analytic ROW_NUMBER function.

How to include case stmt in group by clause

Hi i have a question,
How do i include a case statement in the group by clause?
For example:
Select
(case when x.ctry is null then y.ctry else x.ctry end) as coo,
sum (x.in_amt)
from
tbl1 x,
tbl2 y
where
x.id = y.id
group by
(case when x.ctry is null then y.ctry else x.ctry end)
Assume, I have got millions of records in both the tables, then my guess is, the above query might take huge time to complete.
Any alternate method to do this?

cd/ wrote:
To remove the expression from the GROUP BY clause. I didn't advocate any performance improvements, did I?No you didn't. And your advice can indeed remove the expression from the GROUP BY clause. But I'm still puzzled as to why that would be a goal in itself.
Regards,
Rob.

Without using order by and connect by clause

hi all,
can i write a tree query without using start with clause and connect by clause
and
can i order the employee names in a select query without using order by clause
can those things are possible in select statement...

dipuna wrote:
hi all,
can i write a tree query without using start with clause and connect by clause
and
can i order the employee names in a select query without using order by clause
can those things are possible in select statement...A very odd question.
Those clauses are the means to do what you are asking. Why would you be looking for some other method?

How do you order topics within the Project Manager?

Hi all,
I notice that the workflow in RH is that first you use the
Project Manager (PM) to build a sort of structured topic database,
and then you use the database to generate a TOC.
Ok, so far so good, but the immediate little issue I am
having is that I see that the PM arranges my topics within each
folder in alphabetical order. Since, by default, the TOC is
generated with the topics in this default order, I would like to
change the order in which the topics are arranged within the PM. I
don't seem to find any way to do this. I can't drag and there are
no Move buttons for this pod. What am I missing?
TIA
- avi

Hi Avi
You aren't missing anything. That's the way it works with the
Project Manager Pod. It simply lists your topic files in
alphabetical order.
For starters, I would never recommend that anyone always
automatically create the TOC. I might suggest using that only as a
first step in building a TOC. After it has been built initially,
any added or amended topics would then be manually added and
rearranged by you after the changes have been made.
Unless you are happy with things that way (and I assume you
aren't as you are posting to ask how to make it different) you will
find yourself constantly frustrated. Note that if you auto create
the TOC, you get ALL topics inside. And in many help files there
are topics that never see the light of day in the TOC structure.
All that aside, I do see a great many folks that want to have
an ability to arrange topics in their Project Manager pod as they
want. For you and anyone else that wants this, you should consider
submitting a Wish Form to ask for the feature.
Click
here to view the WishForm/Bug Reporting Form
Cheers... Rick

How to use database file within jar archive

Hi. I'm quite new in Java programming, and I'm wondering if what I did makes sense or not.
In my applet I'm using a MS Access Database file, which is contained in the same Jar Archive like the Applet class file. I tried and tried to use this Database file directly but it wouldn't work. Than I read in some other forum that it is not possible to use the database file directly within the archive. First question: Is that true?
Than I desided to extract the DB file in the init() method of my applet to the default temporary foulder. When the program is closed I use the destroy() method to delete it again. Everything works well now. But is this the typical way this is done?
Thanks for help!

Hi,
here is the code which extracts the database file out of the jar archive (the same archive in which the class file is):
//get the user temporary folder
File TempFolder = new File(System.getProperty("java.io.tmpdir"));
//create (empty) db file
efile = new File(TempFolder, "steelSections.mdb");
// if database file is not yet extracted
if (!efile.exists()) {
//get an input stream for the database file
InputStream in = new BufferedInputStream(this.getClass().getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream(
"FaST/db/steelSections.mdb"));
//create an output stream for the db file on the file system
OutputStream out = new BufferedOutputStream(new FileOutputStream(efile));
//-Buffer to copy the data
byte[] buffer = new byte[2048]; //buffer to copy the binary
for (;;) {
int nBytes = in.read(buffer); //read data
if (nBytes <= 0)
break; //no more data to read
out.write(buffer, 0, nBytes); //write data
out.flush(); //close out and in streams
out.close();
in.close();
If you have the db file in an other jar archive file you need a referenze to the entry in the other jar archive. I'm not sure how to get this, but I'm sure you fill find a solution by searching in this forum...
Good luck!

How to use Pivot function for group range in oracle SQL

Hi,
Good Morning !!!
I need to show the data in the below format. There is 2 columns 1 is State and another one is rate.
State     <100     100-199     200-299     300-399     400-499     500-599     600-699     700-799     800-899     900-999     >=1000     Total
AK     1     2     0     4     1     4     4     35     35     4     1     25
AL     0     0     2     27     10     17     35     2     2     35     0     103
AR     0     0     1     0     0     2     2     13     13     2     0     6
AZ     0     1     2     14     2     14     13     3     3     13     0     57
CA     0     0     1     6     2     7     3     4     4     3     0     34
Developed the below query but unable to use the range on pivot function . Please help on this.
(select      (SELECT SHORT_DESCRIPTION
     FROM CODE_VALUES
     WHERE CODE_TYPE_CODE = ad.STATE_TYPE_IND_CODE
     AND VALUE = ad.STATE_CODE
     ) STATE,
nr.rate
     FROM neutrals n,
     contacts c,
     addresses ad,
     xref_contacts_addresses xca,
     neutral_rates nr
                    where n.contact_id=c.contact_id
                    and n.address_id = ad.address_id
                    and xca.address_id=ad.address_id
                    and xca.contact_id=c.contact_id
                    and nr.contact_id = n.contact_id
                    and nr.rate_frequency='HOUR' )

user8564931 wrote:
This solutions is useful and Thanks for your reply.
How can i get the Min value and Max value for each row ?
State     <100     100-199     200-299     300-399     400-499     500-599     600-699     700-799     800-899     900-999     >=1000     Total     Min     Max
IL     0     0     1     5     1     5     40     1     1     40     0     53     $10     $2,500
IN     0     0     0     0     0     0     1     49     49     1     0     3     $70     $1,500This?
WITH t AS
        (SELECT 'AL' state, 12 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'AL' state, 67 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'AL' state, 23 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'AL' state, 12 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'AL' state, 12 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'AL' state, 78 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'AL' state, 34 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'AL' state, 4 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'AL' state, 12 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'AL' state, 15 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'AZ' state, 6 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'AZ' state, 123 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'AZ' state, 123 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'MA' state, 23 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'MA' state, 120 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'MA' state, 456 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'MA' state, 11 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'MA' state, 24 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'MA' state, 34 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'MA' state, 87 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'MA' state, 23 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'MA' state, 234 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'MA' state, 789 VALUE FROM DUAL
         UNION ALL
         SELECT 'MH' state, 54321 VALUE FROM DUAL),
     -- End of test data
     t1 AS
        ( SELECT state,
                  NVL (COUNT (DECODE (VALUE, 0, 0)), 0) "<100",
                  NVL (COUNT (DECODE (VALUE, 1, 1)), 0) "100-199",
                  NVL (COUNT (DECODE (VALUE, 2, 2)), 0) "200-299",
                  NVL (COUNT (DECODE (VALUE, 3, 3)), 0) "300-399",
                  NVL (COUNT (DECODE (VALUE, 4, 4)), 0) "400-499",
                  NVL (COUNT (DECODE (VALUE, 5, 5)), 0) "500-599",
                  NVL (COUNT (DECODE (VALUE, 6, 6)), 0) "600-699",
                  NVL (COUNT (DECODE (VALUE, 7, 7)), 0) "700-799",
                  NVL (COUNT (DECODE (VALUE, 8, 8)), 0) "800-899",
                  NVL (COUNT (DECODE (VALUE, 9, 9)), 0) "900-999",
                  NVL (COUNT (DECODE (VALUE, 10, 10)), 0) ">=1000"
             FROM (SELECT state,
                          CASE
                             WHEN VALUE < 100 THEN 0
                             WHEN VALUE BETWEEN 100 AND 199 THEN 1
                             WHEN VALUE BETWEEN 200 AND 299 THEN 2
                             WHEN VALUE BETWEEN 300 AND 399 THEN 3
                             WHEN VALUE BETWEEN 400 AND 499 THEN 4
                             WHEN VALUE BETWEEN 500 AND 599 THEN 5
                             WHEN VALUE BETWEEN 600 AND 699 THEN 6
                             WHEN VALUE BETWEEN 700 AND 799 THEN 7
                             WHEN VALUE BETWEEN 800 AND 899 THEN 8
                             WHEN VALUE BETWEEN 900 AND 999 THEN 9
                             WHEN VALUE >= 1000 THEN 10
                          END
                             VALUE
                     FROM t)
         GROUP BY state)
SELECT STATE,
       "<100",
       "100-199",
       "200-299",
       "300-399",
       "400-499",
       "500-599",
       "600-699",
       "700-799",
       "800-899",
       "900-999",
       ">=1000",
         "<100"
       + "100-199"
       + "200-299"
       + "300-399"
       + "400-499"
       + "500-599"
       + "600-699"
       + "700-799"
       + "800-899"
       + "900-999"
       + ">=1000"
          total,
     least("<100",
       "100-199",
       "200-299",
       "300-399",
       "400-499",
       "500-599",
       "600-699",
       "700-799",
       "800-899",
       "900-999",
       ">=1000") min_val,
      greatest("<100",
       "100-199",
       "200-299",
       "300-399",
       "400-499",
       "500-599",
       "600-699",
       "700-799",
       "800-899",
       "900-999",
       ">=1000") max_val
FROM t1
/

How to programmatically order docs within a Portfolio?

I have added documents to a portfolio using c# & calling the jsobject to invoke the javascript importDataObject() method. Now I am trying to work out how to order the documents that I have inserted.   It seems to insert each new document at the beginning of the portfolio.
I am also wondering how to get the inserted doc name to display instead of the original file name.
thanks, Linda

I will have to test with JS only. See entirety of code below. I am pulling the name & fullFilePath out of another c# class..   I have stepped through all in debug & it is definitely passing a name..    ty, linda
// takes a collection drawing element that contains a sublist of all
        // items with matching name/cage code..

How to use multiple profiles within the same instance of Thunderbird

About a month ago, I had Thunderbird configured with three profiles,
and all three could be used within a single startup/instance of
Thunderbird. That PC is now gone. I have re-configured the three
profiles on a new PC, but am having trouble making all three
useable within the same instance of Thunderbird. Can you help?
Both PCs are/were Windows-7 64 bit.

Thunderbird only opens on the default if one profile
or
if Profile Manager is instructed to ask at startup it will allow you to choose which Profile to open else it opens on the last Profile used..
So it shows one Profile at a time in one instance of Thunderbird.
However, one Profile can have many mail accounts.
eg: I run 4 mail accounts in one Profile.

How to use order by within Group by clause

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for