HR strutural Authorization check in the Lean order Interface (LORD)

Hi ,
We place Quotations , Orders in CRM 7.0 , via the Lean order Interface Screen (LORD) . So users in ECC have HR structural authorization and they seems to the checked ( for the HR# part of the Sales Team , and comming accross as partner function in the Quotations , Orders documents )
Can we avoid the HR structural Authorization check in the Lean order Interface ?

Dear Christophe,
I do not understand the requirement...you create ERP orders via CRM interface, and you have set up authorization in ERP for the users. Why do you want to prevent the authority check when coming from CRM when it is needed ?
However please consider note 1446253 quesiton 9.
You might activate or deactivate the "current user" flag in sm59 for your ERP system.
Hope this information helps...
Regards
Rene

Similar Messages

Retaining the old schedule lines after the ATP check in the sales order....

Hi Experts,
I would like to retain the old schedule lines after the ATP/GATP check in the sales order for certain conditions.
I don't want to change XVBEP,IVBEP,VBEP contents in the user-exit..
Is there any standard sub-routine or function module to reatain old schedule lines in the sales order so that the schedule lines will not update with the new values after the ATP check ?
Thanks
Rayudu

In Include LV03VFMM, you have:
* Userexit availability
PERFORM USEREXIT_AVAILABILITY_IN USING DA_ATPPR.
There may be an option to implement some logic in here. However, I tried changing the value of MVERF_POS-EINTEIL[1]-VFPKZ to initial. This will ensure that when FM AVAILABILITY_CHECK_CONTROLLER is called that the following IF statement is untrue:
CHECK NOT P_ATPCSX[] IS INITIAL.
as P_ATPCSX[] Table[0x648].....
However, this will just mean that the 2nd confirmed schedule line (assuming we have > 1 schedule lines) will have a confirmed quantity to zero.
EXIT_SAPLATPC_001 could also be used. However, when I removed the "X" from CHKFLG, I get the same result; the 2nd schedule line will revert to zero.
They were the only tests I tried; I cannot think of any other ways around this....

How to check, when the Maintenance Order was deleted

Hello Experts,
Can you please tell me of how to check for the maintenance order that when it was deleted and who has deleted that.
If any T-Code is there or at the Table level also to check the requirement.
Regards,
Yawar Khan

If you want to track when you have put deletion flag, you can track it using above mentioned techniques.
If you archived (deleted) permanently, then using archival history only, you can check I guess.
Check these links. While deleting maintenance order, we can hisorical order with same number. Using that creation date, you can track.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/8d/3e6552462a11d189000000e8323d3a/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/8d/3e4d2f462a11d189000000e8323d3a/frameset.htm

Add authorization checks to the table maintenance

i have created a table maintenance and I have authorization object and the field for it which will take some values this i got from basis people . Then how to add authorization checks to the table maintenance.

U can try to use the event, after generating table maintenance program:
Enviroment->Modification->Events: the events 05/18 could be good for you
Max

Material Availablity check of the Process Order......

Hi there,
If the reservations of material are made against the process order & the material is not available and the stock is expected in near future........ then during the material availablity check of the process order........will it show that the material is available............
Please elucidate me.......
Thanks
Kaushik

Hi Kaushik,
Availability check is an integral part of the business process that determines if the required delivery quantity can be met on a required delivery date.
Therefore the system checks the current available quantity of stocks.........
but, for example imagine if the available stocks are not sufficient to meet the order............then the system checks replenishment lead time of the material i.e. time taken for the material to become available either internally (in house production) or externally (from a vendor) and then issues a material availability date.........i.e. date on which material would be available for delivery.
Depending on the above checks, the systems issues the delivery date.
<b>Reward if helps</b>
Regards
Sai

Authorization Check while TECO PM ORDER

While performing action TECO of PM order, system check the authorization of Mtc. Plant of Equipment entered in the PM Order in place of Mts. plant authorization of PM Order it self. If during the period of PM order creation to TECO PM order the equipment moved from one Mtc. Plant to other it create problem. My requirment is that system should check the authorization of Mtc. Plant of PM Order copied from equipment while creation of order.

Sanjay,
Plant Maintenance is having authorization objects I_IWERK and I_SWERK which checks the maintenance planning plant and maintenance plant respectively with reference to T-Codes (For ex: IW32) which you can check for particular user and can make changes with this authorization object in user profile.
But first fo all I would like to clarify that in Plant Maintenance, whenever you are moving the equipment from one plant to another plant, it is always advisable to complete all the pending order and notifications prior to dismantling of the equipment and it is pratical too as it is obvious that maintenance team would complete all its pending work before shifting any equipment.
So I would guide that before shifting any equipment in SAP please complete all its orders and then dismantle and then re-install equipment to other plant.
Hope this helps.
Chin2.

Where to Authorization check for the plant while creating outbound delivery

Hi Experts,
For outbound delivery , the standard program is not doing the authorization check .
Can i use BADI *LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC * and the method : DELIVERY_FINAL_CHECK
To write Authority-check statement ,
If the particular is not authorized for any of the plants of the items in the outbound delivery i will throw a error message
Can i use as above?
And if i use it has to apply only for outbound delivery?Because for inbound delivery also the same BADI is getting triggered?
Please suggest.
Regards
Ramakrishna L

Hi,
Yes you can use the said BAdi and the method if it is triggerd before the SAVE of the Outbound Delivery Order to do the Authorisation Check. In case the code is triggered for all the orders and you want only to restrict for the Outbound Delivery, then check for the Delivery Type (LFART) from the Delivery Header table for only the Outbound Delivery Order.
Thanks,
Susanth Swain

ATP check in the Sale order Processing and CO06 transaction (Confirm Qty)

Hi All,
While creating the Sale order, After performing the ATP check and saving the document i have called an user exit to make the confirmed Quantity equal to ZERO when the delivery block is set (As requested by customer). That is working fine...
But the same confirmed Quantity of ZERO is not reflecting in CO06 transaction. Its showing the old value that the value before setting the delivery block.
I have identified the table VBBE-VMENG which stores the confirmed quantity in CO06 transaction...
Could you please help me know any USER EXITS or any other solution to change the confirmed quantity to ZERO in CO06 transaction also while delivery block is set in the sale order.
Thanks &Regards,
Navaneeth

Hi All,
Please help me by providing some clues on this issue...
Regards,
Navaneeth

Customizing Availability Check in the sales order; EXIT_SAPLATPC_001, etc..

Dear All.
Looking for a way to automatically control what's chosen in the sales order Availability Dialog box depending upon certain conditions.
This is the "Rule for transferring the results of the availability check", field TVTA-REVFP.
The default is blank, which lets the user select what they want. Under certain conditions though we do not want to display the dialog box, and just have the system automatically select "A" which is what's available on the requested date.
Mainly I've been trying to find what REVFP translates to in USEREXIT_AVAILABILITY_IN, and EXIT_SAPLATPC_001.
We've reviewing P_ATPCSX-RESMD, in EXIT_SAPLATPC_001. And trying to set it to "A" in debug with no luck.
Possibly this is too late or too early in process, or the wrong field.
Has anyone done anything like this before or have any ideas on how to approach?
Many Thanks!

hey kharthik,
i got the same requirement. hv u got the solution for this ..if so please provide me..
Regds
Satya

Missing authorization check on the IM Reports

Hi,
We use RAIMINFO reports (S_ALR_87012805, S_ALR_87012806 u2026 ) to display
structure and values in Ferrero Spa investment program
On the initial screen, the value types which have to be output, are
determined by the authorization checks to be carried out .
For example in case that an user decides to display the plan or budget
references to program position, the user has to have the authorizations
on the Persons responsible (A_IMPR_VER). For us this is OK because we
define responsibilities through A_IMPR_VER. But if user decides to
display the appropriation request or measures and he doesnu2019t indicates
the program position it seems that anything on the A_IMPR_VER will be
performed. We need that the check on A_IMPR_VER will be performed always(for all objects: measures, appropriation request ).
We think this is a function missing in RAIMINFO and in all the IM
reports.
Could you help us to solve this problem?
Thanks and best regards,

Hi,
If you want use check box in crystal., then you can do this by writing piece of code.
please try for
If {Table.Field} = True Then
'Display the checkbox of your choice here
Formula = Chr(254).
thanks.
Bala

Check if the Sales Order is credit block.

Hello Everyone,
I have a requirement related to third party sales order and delivery. In the first system, a sales is created and then the PO gets created. Upon the creation of the PO a IDOC gets generated. The inbound IDOC in the other system triggers and a sales order gets created. The requirement is that if sales order in the first system is on credit block then automatically the sales order in the second system should go on delivery block.
The solution that I have thought is that when the IDOC gets created after PO generation there itself add a flag to IDOC in case of credit block in sales order. BUT HOW TO CHECK CREDIT BLOCK of the SALES ORDER IN THE CUSTOMER EXIT?
Any help is appreciable.

Hi Rahul,
Need some more clarification on why sales order is created in the second system, if it is a third party process ?
are you creating delivery from the corresponding sales order of second system to replenish sales order of first system ?
are you using standard IDOC type for creating Sales order from PO ?, if so check the Corresponding Function module which may have user exists
check Function module : IDOC_OUTPUT_ORDRSP
At first system, if the sales order is credit block you can restrict creation of PR-->PO in the first system itself, this is a standard Functionality
This would be easier than looking for user and coding in IDOC function module
try and revert
thanks
santosh

Re ATP check in the Sales order

Hi,
I have one strange issue in SO ATP check. I have created a SO and it was cofirmed with Availability check:XX, which was maintained in material master when the SO was created. Then I changed the Avail check to YY and did the Re-ATP check again in SO, but the system takes the old Avail check:XX.
It takes the new Avail check if I create a new line item in the SO, but did not work for the exisitng line item.
Regards
Nagarajan.

Hi Nagarajan,
The master data changes will effect only for the future entries not for the already entered material in the sale order or any other transaction

Manually trigger Availability Check in the Sales Order User Exit MV45AFZZ

Hi All,
As per the normal scenario where sales orders are created and the schedule line delivery dates are determined.
Based on some business logic for few customers we need to change the delivery priority and confirmation delivery date.
We are implementing this logic in the user exit MV45AFZZ in the routine USER_EXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE.
The availability check logic is already implemented by then. Now we have scenarios where the date redetermined by the custom logic is greater than the one determined by the standard availability check done by SAP.
We have changed the values of the field VBEP-EDATU as per our logic but we still have 2 lines in the schedule line data where the requested date is greater than the confirmed date.
This can be tackled if we can redo the Availability Check.
Can someone provide pointers on how can we trigger the availability check manually in the code.
Regards,
Karthik

What was the solution?

Difference in Material availability date for ECC ATP check & for APO ATP check in the same order

Hi Gurus,
I have a question: on what basis material availability date is calculated in forward scheduling?
Eg:
For a customer GR hours are maintained in unloading point calendar in customer master and Customers are not CIF'ed across to APO.
GR hours are maintained for weekdays from 8:00 to 12:00 & 1:00 to 6:00.
In a sales order with two line items with Requested date today & plenty of stock on hand for two products( ECC & APO) where line 10 (product 1) triggers ECC ATP check & line 20 (product 2) triggers APO ATP check at same location (loc1).
RDD is today, material availability date for ECC ATP check (line 10) is today (working as expected) but where as the material availability date for APO ATP check (line 20)is pushed to next day by which for the same customer there are different delivery dates. And two delivery notes will be created & truck will be on road at different times for the same customer which is unacceptable.
What am I missing here to get the material availability date as today for forward scheduling? Please guide me on this.
Thanks,
Nihar

Hi Nihar
Though the logic you mentioned makes sense. I am confused here with the data you have provided:
UTC day
UTC time
CET day
CET time
UTC+6 day
UTC+6 time
RDD
30/04
17:24
30/04
7:24
30/04
23:24
MAD
30/04
17:24
30/04
7:24
30/04
23:24
Lod/GI
02/05
17:24
02/05
7:24
02/05
23:24
Del
12/05
17:24
12/05
7:24
12/05
23:24
Del
13/05
1:00
13/05
3:00
13/05
8:00
Load/GI
05/05
1:00
05/05
3:00
05/05
8:00
MAD
02/05
1:00
02/05
3:00
02/05
8:00
In the first row, the difference in RDD in UTC and UTC+6 is 6 hours. However, in the last three rows I can see the difference between UTC time and UTC+6 time is 7 hours. Would you know the reason to this? Also, in the first four rows, CET time = 7:24 which should had been 19:24. Please correct me if I am missing something here.
Thanks,
Parth Soneji

Sap note doubt (105621 - Authorization check for the condition )

Hi experts,
I am wondering if this note takes effect also in Mm transactions.
Does anyone have experience with this?
Thanks!!
Artur.

Hi Artur,
I guess you should post in service market place instead SDN....
Arpan

HR strutural Authorization check in the Lean order Interface (LORD)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for