HTMLDB_Mail, Push Queue

When does the WWV_FLOW_MAIL_LOG and WWV_FLOW_MAIL_QUEUE get updated. I have some mails going through without any issues and they are in the mail_log, and I have some which are just in the mail_queue and do not get sent though the email addresses are valid.
I check the wwv_flow_mail_queue and can see a few mails unsent. The mail_to, mail_from and mail_cc columns all have valid email address (these are set from the application), but when i say push_queue, then the mail does not get sent and are still in the queue. I then sent another mail from sqlplus, then this is in the queue, the only difference being the security_group_id is 0 for this and for all the others it has a big number. When I say push_queue from sqlplus, then only the new mail is sent, all the other mails are still in the queue.

Hi Jes,
Thanks. Was just calling my eMail guys, because I realised that the mails within our domain were being sent without any issues, however, if it is to our other group companies mail, or to internet email ids, they were not being sent. So, think it looks more like the lotus notes server settings.
Another thing I noticed is that if either of the TO or the CC has an invalid address, then the mail is not being sent to both of them. I was expecting the mail to be sent to the valid adddress. For example, if the TO email ID is correct, and the CC email ID is incorrect, then the mail should be sent to email in the TO.

Similar Messages

Pushing queued emails

While configuring (and perhaps later in the "real life") every now and then I see messages stuck in a working or held queue (as seen with imsimta qm dir; imsimta qm held).
Quite often this is for a reason, i.e. the relay-out daemon was down (restarting) at the moment a message was trying to relay. The problem is, I can't always easily push the mails to go on after the cause is fixed. It can sit in the queue for hours, sometimes even after a full restart of the messaging services.
While "imsimta run tcp_local" sometimes helps, it takes surprisingly long to run (i.e. 2-3 minutes for a queue with a single stuck message).
What I would like to achieve is something like sendmail's "-qI" flag (perhaps coupled with a fake hoststatus directory path) which tries to immediately send all messages from the queue and ignores previous failures and SMTP retry timeouts which they may have caused.
I did not yet find a correct non-disruptive procedure in the docs/blogs/forums/wikis, perhaps I need some pointing help from the gurus? ;)
Another inconvenience concerns the HELD messages. After I fixed the reason that got several dozen messages into the HELD status, I had to "release" them one-by-one from the interactive mode. In fact, then I hacked up a small script to release a hardcoded amount of messages at once, but there certainly must be a more correct and elegant method:
( echo "dir"; A=1; while [ $A -le 35 ]; do echo release $A; `echo "$A+1" | bc`; done ) | imsimta qm

JimKlimov wrote:
Quite often this is for a reason, i.e. the relay-out daemon was down (restarting) at the moment a message was trying to relay. The problem is, I can't always easily push the mails to go on after the cause is fixed. It can sit in the queue for hours, sometimes even after a full restart of the messaging services.You can use the ETRN command to push emails destined for a specific host in this situation e.g.
bash-2.05$ telnet mta.aus.sun.com 25
Trying 1.2.3.4...
Connected to mta.aus.sun.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mta.aus.sun.com -- Server ESMTP (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.01 (built May 14 2008; 32bit))
etrn relay.aus.sun.com
250 2.0.0 Delivery started on channel.
quit
221 2.3.0 Bye received. Goodbye.This will only re-try those emails which are destined for the specified host rather then re-attempting delivery for all emails in the channel.
While "imsimta run tcp_local" sometimes helps, it takes surprisingly long to run (i.e. 2-3 minutes for a queue with a single stuck message).This does indeed sound like a long time. How many emails are in the tcp_local queue when you ran the command?
Another inconvenience concerns the HELD messages. After I fixed the reason that got several dozen messages into the HELD status, I had to "release" them one-by-one from the interactive mode. You shouldn't need to do this. Try the following steps to select/process multiple held messages in a channel:
./imsimta qm
dir -held <channel name e.g. tcp_local>
release 1-<last message number>So if you had 10 held messages in tcp_local it would look like this:
./imsimta qm
dir -held tcp_local
release 1-10Regards,
Shane.

Htmldb_mail.send problem

For some reason some of our customers have been receiving multiple copies of a same message. We are sending notifications to our clients and sometimes we can send out 4000 emails at a time.
Here is a trimed down example of the code that will allow to reproduce.
declare
    I INTEGER := 1;
begin
--Sending message to customer
WHILE I < 1500 LOOP
    htmldb_mail.send(
      p_to   => 'email_from', -- Change this to something valid
      p_from => 'email_to',    -- Used my inbox to tes
      p_body => 'TEST' || I,
      p_subj => 'TEST' || I );
    I := I + 1;
END LOOP;
end;What I get in my inbox when testing is 3000 + messages. Is there a limit on how many emails can be managed at a time in the queue?
I do not push the queue, I let it manage itself. We are using HTMLDB 2.0 and yes I know we should upgrade but it's not going to happen anytime soon.
P.S. When doing the same exercise with under 1000 loops, it works properly.
Thanks in advance for any help.

I did some more testing and it would seem that it's the HTMLDB_MAIL.PUSH_QUEUE that is to blame. I do not push the queue but we have other applications that call it.
If I have messages in the queue that are waiting and two other applications call the push queue I will receive multiple copies of the messages that are waiting to be sent.

EventQueue.push / pop methods

Hi,
I'm implementing a method, which must return data. The data is calculated by a SwingWorker. The method is called by the AWT dispatch thread. The SwingWorker runs EventQueue.invokeLater() now and then to generate a progress dialog.
I call SwingWorker.get() inside the method, but this freezes up the GUI. So... I do
    private static class MyEventQueue
        extends EventQueue
        public MyEventQueue()
            super();
        @Override
        public void pop()
            super.pop();
    int[] method()
        SwingWorker<int[], Void> worker = new SwingWorker<int[], Void>(){
            @Override
            protected int[] doInBackground()
                /* do stuff */
       worker.execute();
        MyEventQueue queue = new MyEventQueue();
        Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getSystemEventQueue().push(queue);
        try {
            return worker.get();
        }catch (ExecutionException e){
            throw new Exception();
        }catch (InterruptedException e){
            throw new Exception();
        }finally{
            queue.pop();
    }... and it works! The events generated by the SwingWorker get fired. I want to know, is this recommended?
Is it dangerous? What could go wrong?
Thanks,
Jesse
Edited by: JesseLong on Nov 27, 2008 3:25 AM (added worker.execute() call)

Yes, normally I would, but... My method needs to block until all data is received, and then return all data. This is not optional, and when blocking (even using the process and publish methods and blocking until all data is received), I hold up the dispatch thread. So, I cant use publish and process. (Or, I can, but I have the same problem as get()).

Inbound email receiving and processing: push and pull

Hi Experts
i know there are 2 alternative ways to configure the inbound email receiving and processing: push and pull
(see also /people/cathy.ma/blog/2009/06/23/introduction-to-the-interaction-center-agent-inbox)
My question is: what if i configured the email in push and, at the end of day, some emails are not already read by the Contact Center Operator ?
The day after will the agent see those unread email in the push queue, or in pull in the Agent Inbox (thus transforming them into work item) ?
Those emails are not lost. True?
Maybe it is a simplistic question
thanks for the support
Angelo T.

Hello Angelo,
No, actually. ICI interface "push" emails are handled just like a telephone call. You would never leave a telephone call sitting in the queue at the end of the day, and its the same with ICI emails. The key here is that ICI is real time! This is quite a different approach than the SAPConnect interface which uses workflow to route the emails to an Inbox (virtual queue). In the Inbox case, of course an agent would see lots of emails sitting in the queue the next day. Hope that helps!
Regards,
John

Typeahead with a busy Application

Hi,
I hava a java application with a single thread server and a mullti thread client.
It works only when I make the client busy implemented with a visible glasspane.
Then go all events to the glasspane.
How can I implement the typeahead that all events after busy used.
I try a new EventQueue and set it
Toolkit tk = Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit();
EventQueue q = tk.getSystemEventQueue();
q.push( queue);
or can I use a Robot - class
if (busy) {
try {
rob = new Robot();
rob.setAutoWaitForIdle( true);
} catch (Exception ex) {
rob = null;
ex.printStackTrace();
else if (rob != null) {
rob.setAutoWaitForIdle( false);
rob = null;
both doesn't realy work
have everyone a good idea

Have everybody an BufferedEventQueue for me
please help

Library search not working

Hi,
Having issues with search in lists/libraries.
Search is working and all needed content crawled (found in logs).
Same crawled documents found via search center but not in the library.
I've found strange search behavior:
Search center result pages gives everything I search for while default SharePoint search page (osssearchresults.aspx) shows no results at all (think they are connected).
Read some forums in here and I'm afraid none affect my problem.
Only related ULS logs I could see is:
Query Processing aizc0
High Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Query.Ims.ImsQueryInternal : New request: Query text 'let', Query template '{searchboxquery}'; HiddenConstraints: site:"http://www.site"; SiteSubscriptionId: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98
Query aj41o
High ProductivitySearchFlowExecutor: New request: Query template '{searchboxquery}' transformed to query text 'let'.
baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98
Query Processing aizf6
High Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Query.Pipeline.Executors.LinguisticQueryProcessingExecutor : QSC: All Annotations: <Annotation ID="1" Name="token" Range="[0,3)" Attributes={normalizedForm="let"}
NumericalAttributes={}/>,<Annotation ID="2" Name="querysegment" Range="[0,3)" Attributes={} NumericalAttributes={}/>
baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98
Search Component ajkor
High Microsoft.Ceres.SearchCore.Query.MarsLookupComponent.MarsLookupUtils: Skipping requested field Rank because this is a duplicate request
baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98
Search Component ajkor
High Microsoft.Ceres.SearchCore.Query.MarsLookupComponent.MarsLookupUtils: Skipping requested field DocId because this is a duplicate request
baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98
Search Component akebx
High Microsoft.Ceres.SearchCore.Services.Query.AbstractQueryParameters: Query compressed from: 5866 to 1248 bytes.
baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98
Search Component ajkph
High Microsoft.Ceres.SearchCore.Query.MarsLookupComponent.LookupService.QueryClient.QueryExecutor: ExecuteQuery timings for correlation: baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98, task dispatch 0 ms, blocked waiting 19
ms, total hits: 0, with dupes: 0, bytes received: 56, 1 tasks: (cell: I.0.0 at IndexComponent1, total task time: 18 ms, query push queue: 0 ms, send to index call duration: 3 ms, total in transit: 4 ms, index node execute queue: 0 ms, query lookup: 14 ms,
docsum lookup: 0 ms) baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98
Search Component ajkqa
High Microsoft.Ceres.SearchCore.Query.MarsLookupComponent.Processing.MarsLookupProducer: Total query time: 20
baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98
Query ad985
High eventIndexLookupDone: b8597159-a156-448e-ba15-f4d4b7e2f51f, baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98, 20, .
baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98
Query Processing aizkf
High Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Query.Pipeline.Processing.SummarizerEvaluator : Unable to generate summaries and/or highlight properties since no results were found for 'RelevantResults' table.
baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98
Query ad7pd
High eventSearchFlowDone: b8597159-a156-448e-ba15-f4d4b7e2f51f, let -ContentClass=urn:content-class:SPSPeople, Microsoft.SharePointSearchProviderFlow, 29, SP-APP1.
baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98
Query Processing aiy99
High Microsoft.Ceres.InteractionEngine.Component.FlowHandleRegistry : CorrelationId=baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98, TenantId=0c37852b-34d0-418e-91c6-2ac25af4be5b, Query=let -ContentClass=urn:content-class:SPSPeople,
FlowName=Microsoft.SharePointSearchProviderFlow, QueryExecutionTime=28.9804, QueryResultSize=19692
baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98
Query afu4i
High No interleaving blocks Deduped 0 results due to pinned results No blocks with available results to interleave
baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98
Query Processing aizc6
High Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Query.Ims.ImsQueryInternal : Number of tables in Result: 4, Relevant Results: 0, Refinement Results: 0
baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98
Service Connections ev2x
High [Forced due to logging gap, cached @ 02/03/2014 15:10:11.76, Original Level: Verbose] <TraceRecord xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2004/10/E2ETraceEvent/TraceRecord" Severity="Suspend"><TraceIdentifier>http://msdn.microsoft.com/he-IL/library/System.ServiceModel.Diagnostics.ActivityBoundary.aspx</TraceIdentifier><Description>Activity
boundary.</Description><AppDomain>/LM/W3SVC/2/ROOT/b8597159a156448eba15f4d4b7e2f51f-1-130359030705970117</AppDomain><ExtendedData xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2006/08/ServiceModel/DictionaryTraceRecord"><ActivityName>Process
action 'http://tempuri.org/IImsService/Execute'.</ActivityName><ActivityType>ProcessAction</ActivityType></ExtendedData></TraceRecord>
baa0709c-1ca1-30e0-dd6d-ea3117f7ab98
Any ideas?

Problem Solved!
It appeared that my AAM wasn't configured properly. Needed to add "www" to default entry.

Sending keyevents to JTextField programatically.

Hi All,
Can anybody let me know how do I sent key event to a text field programatically. I want to send all keystrokes in the keyboard (including ENTER, ESCAPE,letters,numbers etc) to a textfield.
I tried something like this and it didn't work. No exception is thrown, but the characters does not appear in the target field.
int kcf = KeyEvent.VK_UNDEFINED;
char kcharf = '9';
KeyEvent event = new KeyEvent(_mTarget,
     KeyEvent.KEY_PRESSED, System.currentTimeMillis(), 0,
     kcf, kcharf);
try {
      java.lang.reflect.Field f =
          AWTEvent.class.getDeclaredField("focusManagerIsDispatching");
          f.setAccessible(true);
          f.set(event, Boolean.TRUE);
   catch(Exception exp) {
        System.err.println(exp);
   _mTarget.dispatchEvent(event);Please help me to resolve the problem. My main purpose is to write a virtual keypad.
Thanks
Deekshit M

Maybe create a custom EventQueue:
EventQueue queue = new EventQueue()
     protected void dispatchEvent(AWTEvent event)
          if (event.getID() == KeyEvent.KEY_TYPED
          || event.getID() == KeyEvent.KEY_PRESSED
          || event.getID() == KeyEvent.KEY_RELEASED)
               // create new KeyEvent and dispatch it to your text field
          else
               super.dispatchEvent(event);
Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getSystemEventQueue().push(queue);

Mail is Not sending thru Apex_mail_send Procedure

Hi ,
We have created a Leave application , when i entered the leave request its sending the mail to the approver.
But its not sending the mail. We thought that mail considered as a SPAM thats the reason the mail server should block the mail.
Procedure is
apex_mail.send(
     p_to        => :P111_APPROVE, ---- approver mail id
     p_from      => :p111_FROM,      ---- default mail id
     p_cc        => :P111_ALT_APPROVER, --- alternate approver mail id
     p_body      => l_body,        --- body we are declaring in a clob variable
     p_body_html => l_body_html, --- body HTML same as BODY
     p_subj      => :p111_subject); --- Subject
apex_mail.push_queue(p_smtp_hostname => :P111_HOST,   --- Here passing the HOST address
p_smtp_portno => :P111_PORT); --- here PORT address.Can anyone suggestion me how to slove this problem.
Regards,
Shan
Edited by: Shan on 3 Jun, 2010 2:12 PM

Hi,
I have passed the host and port number to push queue.
But when i checked the apex_mail_queue there is no data.
In apex_mail_log the data and content is there. SMTP error also NULL.
I am not clear about instance
My URL is : http://192.168.1.114:7777/pls/apex/
My Host address is : 192.168.1.114
Port Number is: 25
Pot number is comin from SELECT PORT_NO FROM COM_IP_ADDRESS;
Regards,
Shan

Can I have my own implementation of java.awt.EventQueue

Hi guys,
Can I "override" the default implementation of java.awt.EventQueue? Some JVM/CVM tricks?
For any tips, Thanks!

I think what you're looking for is EventQueue#push(EventQueue).
public static void main(String[] args) {
        final EventQueue queue = new EventQueue() {
            public void postEvent(final AWTEvent theEvent) {
                super.postEvent(theEvent);
                System.out.println("postEvent "+theEvent);
        Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getSystemEventQueue().push(queue);
        final JFrame frame = new JFrame();
        frame.setContentPane(new JButton("Click Me"));
        frame.setSize(300, 300);
        frame.setLocationRelativeTo(null);
        frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
        frame.setVisible(true);
    }

How do I improve performance while doing pull, push and delete from Azure Storage Queue

Hi,
I am working on a distributed application with Azure Storage Queue for message queuing. queue will be used by multiple clients across the clock and thus it is expected that it would be heavily loaded most on the time in usage. business case is typical as in
it pulls message from queue, process the message then deletes the message from queue. this module also sends back a notification to user indicating process is complete. functions/modules work fine as in they meet the logical requirement. pretty typical queue
scenario.
Now, coming to the problem statement. since it is envisaged that the queue would be heavily loaded most of the time, I am pushing towards to speed up processing of the overall message lifetime. the faster I can clear messages, the better overall experience
it would be for everyone, system and users.
To improve on performance I did multiple cycles for performance profiling and then improving on the identified "HOT" path/function.
It all came down to a point where only the Azure Queue pull and delete are the only two most time consuming calls outside. I can further improve on pull, which i did by batch pulling 32 message at a time (which is the max message count i can pull from Azure
queue at once at the time of writing this question.), this returned me a favor as in by reducing processing time to a big margin. all good till this as well.
i am processing these messages in parallel so as to improve on overall performance.
pseudo code:
//AzureQueue Class is encapsulating calls to Azure Storage Queue.
//assume nothing fancy inside, vanila calls to queue for pull/push/delete
var batchMessages = AzureQueue.Pull(32); Parallel.ForEach(batchMessages, bMessage =>
//DoSomething does some background processing;
try{DoSomething(bMessage);}
catch()
//Log exception
AzureQueue.Delete(bMessage);
With this change now, profiling results show that up-to 90% of time is only taken by the Azure Message delete calls. As it is good to delete message as soon as processing is done, i remove it just after "DoSomething" is finished.
what i need now is suggestions on how to further improve performance of this function when 90% of the time is being eaten up by the Azure Queue Delete call itself? is there a better faster way to perform delete/bulk delete etc?
with the implementation mentioned here, i get speed of close to 25 messages/sec. Right now Azure queue delete calls are choking application performance. so is there any hope to push it further.
Does it also makes difference in performance which queue delete call am making? as of now queue has overloaded method for deleting message, one which except message object and another which accepts message identifier and pop receipt. i am using the later
one here with message identifier nad pop receipt to delete message from queue.
Let me know if you need any additional information or any clarification in question.
Inputs/suggestions are welcome.
Many thanks.

The first thing that came to mind was to use a parallel delete at the same time you run the work in DoSomething. If DoSomething fails, add the message back into the queue. This won't work for every application, and work that was in the queue
near the head could be pushed back to the tail, so you'd have to think about how that may effect your workload.
Or, make a threadpool queued delete after the work was successful. Fire and forget. However, if you're loading the processing at 25/sec, and 90% of time sits on the delete, you'd quickly accumulate delete calls for the threadpool until you'd
never catch up. At 70-80% duty cycle this may work, but the closer you get to always being busy could make this dangerous.
I wonder if calling the delete REST API yourself may offer any improvements. If you find the delete sets up a TCP connection each time, this may be all you need. Try to keep the connection open, or see if the REST API can delete more at a time
than the SDK API can.
Or, if you have the funds, just have more VM instances doing the work in parallel, so the first machine handles 25/sec, the second at 25/sec also - and you just live with the slow delete. If that's still not good enough, add more instances.
Darin R.

Business messages are not pushed back to the aq exception queue in case of errors

Hi,
I have the scenario, where I have configured the business events in ebs and implemented the soa interface which consumes the event message from wf_bpel_q.
SOA interface is able to pickup the messages succesfully and same message will be pushed back to the same queue with the status=READY in case of exceptions as well. Ideally as per default functionality of AQ, in case of errors, messages will be pushed to exception queue.
Please suggest why mesages are not pushed back to exception queue in case of errror scenarios with the status='Errored'. Please let me know what i have been missing here in the setup.
Regards,
Anjana

Hi Anjana,
I am not familiar with the SOA interface, so I can't help you in detail, but take a closer look to the following documents.
Doc ID 1374461.1 , Doc ID 1075611.1 , Doc ID 1356146.1
Maybe you hit a known bug ....
Hope that helps.

Push different type of messages to JMS Queue using JMS Adapter

Platform: Oracle SOA 11g. JMS Adapter.
I got to push different types of messages as string to same queue. JMS Adapter requires schema to push a message to a queue. Since messages are of different types, how can I push them into queue. I tried to use singleString schema. Result is that actual message gets wrapped into <singleString> root element which is not the required result.
Any hints or links shall be appreciated.

Thanks fo ryour reply and help. I appreciate that.
Wrapping of original message in <singleString> element is done by JMS Adapter as the very last activity/setting. I am not composing/transforming message into final shape with singleString through transformation.
Once message is with JMS adapted on one end, it is in Queue on the other end. No control.
Since consuming end is not in my control and requires the actual message in Text format, I need to have the message target queue in Text format.
If I select the Opaque schema, following error message is thrown.
<bpelFault><faultType>0</faultType><mismatchedAssignmentFailure xmlns="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/process/executable"><part name="summary"><summary>Mismatch Assign. cannot set a nonmessage value to a message-based variable. An attempt to assign a nonmessage value to a message-based variable failed. Verify the BPEL source for invalid assign activities.< /summary></part></mismatchedAssignmentFailure></bpelFault>

Push Notification Appear twice on Queue

Hello all,
I just schedule a push notification to be sent out later on today and noticed the notification appeared twice on the queue, I am sending this to all my users. Is the reason I am seeing 2 because my app is universal, 1 notification for my iPad users and 1 notification for my iPhone users? Thanks.

1. Settings > General > Reset > Reset Network Settings
2. Bite the bullet - Restore as new without using a backup (which may have corrupted data/settings.

PUSH MAIL Queue please

Hi,
in the moment I get no mails.
I think you have to push the queue.
This problem occurs sometimes ?

sorry, all works fine now - it could be a delay in our internal (Oracle Mail-Instance) delivery of Mails.

HTMLDB_Mail, Push Queue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for