Idle in transaction

Hi to everyone,
My situation
With Netbeans 6.1 I developed a java application to manage data which uses jre 6u7 and jdbc4 to connect to a postgres 8.2.5 database, in the code I use entity manager and persistence unit.
All fine, BUT apparently randomly i obtain an 'idle in transaction' status from postgres connections, since I previously developed a similar project in php and NEVER had a similar problem, I wonder if this is a common problem (many topics found in the net but none enlightning) . Help will be very appreciated since this problem freezes all DB queries I execute after.
I say 'apparently randomly' since the same code works fine 3 or 4 times and then BUM! idle in transaction and I must kill the postgres connection manually.
Is this a problem with jdbc or persistence or what? I can't guess, please help. Thanks in advance.

If you're using a persistence framework, you don't need to setAutocommit manually, or better you must not!
It's up to the persistence layer. From a jdbc point of view setting autocommit to false starts a transaction and
setting it to true will commit. Which persistence framework are you using?

Similar Messages

  • UC560 CUE not working--gives error "your recording is too short, record a longer message"

    I have a UC560 running Unity Express 8.0.3 that is having voicemail issues. After a CUE reload, if a call goes to voicemail the caller gets a message saying "your recording is too short, record a longer message"; at this moment, an error shows up in the CUE session saying "localhost postgres: voicemail aesop [local] idle in transaction:   CRASH sql sql sql PANIC:  failed to add item to the right sibling for "pg_largeobject_loid_pn_index".  After this error appears, any calls forwarded to voicemail just ring until they eventually disconnect.
    I have confirmed that we are not exceeding maximum storage.
    Is this a corrupt database? Would resetting the CUE to factory defaults help?

    Hi Mike,
    Was your issue solved? as I am facing same issue.
    Please share your solution with me.
    Thanks. 

  • Auto Logout when idle not working for transaction iview

    Hi,
    When we open an SAP system using transaction iview and if the screen is idle for 30 mins, auto logout doesn't seem to be work.
    We have verified that rdisp/gui_auto_logout parameter is set to 1800 i.e., 30 min. which a default value. Do we have to activate this service or its activated by default? Let me know if any other parameter needs to be configured.
    Also, is there a way to detect multiple sessions when SAP transaction is executed like the way SAP Logon pad detects when user has logged in into SAP system on different PC?
    We are using NW portal 7.01 and IE 7.
    Regards,
    Vaibhav

    Hi
    the param icm/keep_alive_timeout does only that if within this time interval new data arrives over the network from the partner, the ICM attempts to keep the connection open once it has been established. If, for the existing connection, there is no further communication within the specified time period, the ICM terminates the connection. and this is a static param so if u change this it needs a sys restart and the param rdisp/plugin_auto_logout is also dependent on the above param as then it delets only the user context after the time period is reached not the work process context and the param login/disable_multi_gui_login works only for dialog log ins not for prta and as far as my knowledge there is no other way to detect this but i heard like by doing some code changes u can know something regarding that.
    Thanks & Regards
    Pradeep Srimanthula

  • Ending a user transaction after idle time

    Hi guru's,
    We have a customer transaction used by a lot of endusers that may block some pernrs.
    I'd really like to end the transaction after say like 5 minutes of idle time so the pernrs are no longer blocked by a certain enduser.
    Using the time out of the system so the enduser loses his session or messing with the en- or dequeue commands is not an option.
    Any ideas or approaches?  Useful responses will be rewarded
    Kind regards,
    Jonathan

    hi Jonathan,
    I have a report that loops at pernr (get pernr).
    after start of selection, but before get pernr, I have:
    time = sy-uzeit. **start time of the program
    right before end-of-selection (the end of the pernr loop) i have
    time2 = sy-uzeit.
    then:
    if time2 - time1 > 300.***(Seconds)
    ***if the prgram has been running longer than 5 mins, exit
    write: / 'time exceeded'.
    exit.
    endif.
    hope this helps.
    Warren

  • Oracle 9 and XA transaction recovery

    Just thought I would pass on a bit of advice if you are attempting to enable XA transaction recovery from either Application Server 7.0 or 8.1 with Oracle version 9.2.0.6 and possibly above.
    In 9.2.0.6 Oracle changed the way they responded to XA recovery queries from transaction managers and so to now allow a list of XAID's to be returned without an exception being raised you will need to have the following privileges on the Application Server Oracle user attempting to do the recovery:
    Select on DBA_PENDING_TRANSACTIONS, PENDING_TRANS$, DBA_2PC_PENDING and DBA_2PC_NEIGHBORS
    and the new one execute on DBMS_SYSTEM
    Also I discovered that although a db ping is possible in Application server 8.1 with lower case properties on the user, password and url (JDBC Pool properties) in order to get XA recovery to work for some reason these had to be changed to be case sensitive. See below:
    Not working:
    <jdbc-connection-pool connection-validation-method="table"
    datasource-classname="oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXADataSou
    rce" fail-all-connections="false" idle-timeout-in-seconds="300"
    is-connection-validation-required="true" is-isolation-leve
    l-guaranteed="false" max-pool-size="32"
    max-wait-time-in-millis="60000" name="OraclePool"
    pool-resize-quantity="2" res-typ
    e="javax.sql.XADataSource" steady-pool-size="8"
    validation-table-name="DUAL">
    <description>Oracle Pool</description>
    <property name="user" value="sunone"/>
    <property name="url" value="jdbc:oracle:oci:@SS"/>
    <property name="password" value="sunone"/>
    </jdbc-connection-pool>
    Working!!
    <jdbc-connection-pool connection-validation-method="table"
    datasource-classname="oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXADataSou
    rce" fail-all-connections="false" idle-timeout-in-seconds="300"
    is-connection-validation-required="true" is-isolation-leve
    l-guaranteed="false" max-pool-size="32"
    max-wait-time-in-millis="60000" name="OraclePool"
    pool-resize-quantity="2" res-typ
    e="javax.sql.XADataSource" steady-pool-size="8"
    validation-table-name="DUAL">
    <description>Oracle Pool</description>
    <property name="User" value="sunone"/>
    <property name="URL" value="jdbc:oracle:oci:@SS"/>
    <property name="Password" value="sunone"/>
    </jdbc-connection-pool>
    Just thought I would share that with you!

    I am able to connect and message to Oracle AQ using an XA Datasource using the getVendorConnection method on the Weblogic connection wrapper (WLConnection).
    This, however, seems to be memory leaking quite badly. I've followed the Weblogic documentation (which says that you should not call close() on the Vendor connection).
    I've also tried closing the vendorConnection object and nulling out the reference that the WLConnection holds. This slows the leak, but it appears that the WLConnections are never being released.
    Has anyone else had any success doing this?
    Dom.

  • Database connection getting reset after application server is idle

    Hi,
    I have a centralized database with 7 to 8 tablespaces for different applications, for one of the linux based application i am having the captioned issue. The system works fine but whenever its left idle for more than 45 minutes the following scenario occurs.
    1.     04 Transactions performed all the transactions are parked in the queue of process1.
    2.     Process 1 reads the first transaction and in order to pass it to the next process queue (process2) refers to the database table to check that the process is registered and running and gets its process id to pass the message to its queue. At this level while trying to get the next process details the database call takes somewhere around 15 minutes and return the below error.
    DBError::dumpError error code: [3135], error Msg: [ORA-03135: connection lost contact
    ]11/04/24 12:55:45:352 |INFO| DBCommand::ExecuteSP--DR SP [PKGCONFIGURATION.spIsModuleRegistered] Exception [3135] ORA-03135: connection lost contact
    11/04/24 12:55:45:405 |ERR | Registrar::isRegistered mod id [21987475]: registration check failed
    the above scenario occurs first time when every process receives any message from other and tries to fetch any details from the database. Once all the process have got these errors and are through with the database the next messages gets entertained in a proper manner.
    Can anybody help in this regard. Secondly i do have the trace level logs if needed can be shared for reference and below is the error i get in SQLNET.ORA
    Fatal NI connect error 12170.
    VERSION INFORMATION:
         TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
         TCP/IP NT Protocol Adapter for Linux: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    Time: 27-APR-2011 16:07:52
    Tracing not turned on.
    Tns error struct:
    ns main err code: 12535
    TNS-12535: TNS:operation timed out
    ns secondary err code: 12560
    nt main err code: 505
    TNS-00505: Operation timed out
    nt secondary err code: 110
    nt OS err code: 0
    Thanks in anticipation.
    Regards
    Hassan

    Not an Oracle issue. Network. Your network connection has been configured to time out after 45 minutes and for a reason.
    Do either one of the following things, in order of preference
    1 Take the 'application', find a garbage bin, and put it in the garbage bin, where it belongs.
    Oracle has Streams available for Queuing applications, and this heavily sounds like a hobby implementation of Streams.
    2 Have your network administratror up the timeout to indefinite.
    You may want to implement 2) before you implement 1)
    Sybrand Bakker
    Senior Oracle DBA

  • JDBC  Transaction is no longer active - status: 'Marked rollback'

    I'm getting the folowing issue, we are not seeing this issue if we recycle the WLS
    Using WLS V10.3.3
    Can any one suggest on this issue, how to reslove this
    85417.772: [Full GC [PSYoungGen: 117504K->0K(234880K)] [PSOldGen: 662564K->665699K(700416K)] 780068K->665699K(935296K) [PSPermGen: 133284K->132438K(225280K)], 30.2876423 secs] [Times: user=31.23 sys=0.68, real=30.32 secs]
    java.sql.SQLException: The transaction is no longer active - status: 'Marked rollback. [Reason=weblogic.transaction.internal.TimedOutException: Transaction timed out after 39 seconds
    BEA1-600C65F8B23E363DFDF0]'. No further JDBC access is allowed within this transaction.
    at weblogic.jdbc.wrapper.JTSConnection.checkIfRolledBack(JTSConnection.java:193)
    at weblogic.jdbc.wrapper.JTSConnection.checkConnection(JTSConnection.java:209)
    at weblogic.jdbc.wrapper.ResultSet.preInvocationHandler(ResultSet.java:99)
    at weblogic.jdbc.wrapper.ResultSet_oracle_jdbc_driver_OracleResultSetImpl.next(Unknown Source)
    at com.vzw.pos.cmw.ejb.service.UserProfileService.getNewUserId(Unknown Source)
    at com.vzw.pos.cmw.ejb.utils.CMWEjbUtil.createUserProfileVO(Unknown Source)
    at com.vzw.pos.cmw.ejb.utils.CMWEjbUtil.createRosterVO(Unknown Source)
    at com.vzw.pos.cmw.ejb.service.AdministrationBean.getRostersByUserId(Unknown Source)
    at com.vzw.pos.cmw.ejb.service.Administration_ujnwz8_ELOImpl.__WL_invoke(Unknown Source)
    at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.SessionLocalMethodInvoker.invoke(SessionLocalMethodInvoker.java:39)
    at com.vzw.pos.cmw.ejb.service.Administration_ujnwz8_ELOImpl.getRostersByUserId(Unknown Source)
    at com.vzw.pos.cmw.action.CMWTopFrameAction.setUserRoleInSession(Unknown Source)
    at com.vzw.pos.cmw.action.CMWTopFrameAction.changeLocation(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor190.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
    at org.apache.struts.actions.DispatchAction.dispatchMethod(DispatchAction.java:280)
    at org.apache.struts.actions.DispatchAction.execute(DispatchAction.java:216)
    at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.processActionPerform(RequestProcessor.java:484)
    at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.process(RequestProcessor.java:274)
    at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.process(ActionServlet.java:1482)
    at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doPost(ActionServlet.java:525)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:727)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:300)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.TailFilter.doFilter(TailFilter.java:26)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
    at com.vzw.pos.cmw.filters.CMWFilter.doFilter(Unknown Source)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.wrapRun(WebAppServletContext.java:3710)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:3676)
    at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
    at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:120)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2272)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:2178)
    at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1454)
    at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
    at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
    <Aug 23, 2013 10:41:53 AM EDT> <Warning> <Socket> <BEA-000450> <Socket 298 internal data record unavailable (probable closure due idle timeout), event received -32>
    <Aug 23, 2013 10:41:53 AM EDT> <Warning> <Socket> <BEA-000450> <Socket 286 internal data record unavailable (probable closure due idle timeout), event received -32>
    <Aug 23, 2013 10:41:56 AM EDT> <Warning> <Socket> <BEA-000450> <Socket 299 internal data record unavailable (probable closure due idle timeout), event received -32>
    <Aug 23, 2013 10:42:51 AM EDT> <Warning> <Socket> <BEA-000450> <Socket 286 internal data record unavailable (probable closure due idle timeout), event received -32>

    Here is DS configuration
    Initial Capacity:                  75
    Maximum Capacity:                  75
    Capacity Increment:                    1
    Seconds to trust an idle pool connection:     10
    Shrink Frequency:                    900
    Enable Connection Leak Profiling:          False
    Enable Connection Profiling:               False
    Test Frequency:                         120 seconds
    Test Connections on Reserve:               True
    Connection Reserve Timeout:               10 seconds
    Connection Creation Retry Frequency:         1
    Inactive Connection Timeout:               60 second
    Maximum Waiting for Connection:               2147483647
    Statment Cache Type:     LRU
    Statment Cache Size:     10
    Connection Creation Relay Frequency:      1
    Remove Infected Connections Enabled:      True
    Wrap Data types:     True
    Ignore In-use connections:     True

  • TSQL Script to monitor SQL Server transactional and snapshot replication

    Hi Team,
    Could you please let me know do you have any TSQL script to monitor replication(Transactional, Snapshot) with current status ? I have tried below script but it giving error. could you please have a look at the below script or do you have any other new TSQL
    script to monitor the replication status ?
    "Msg 8164, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_MSload_tmp_replication_status, Line 80
    An INSERT EXEC statement cannot be nested."
    DECLARE @srvname VARCHAR(100)
    DECLARE @pub_db VARCHAR(100)
    DECLARE @pubname VARCHAR(100)
    CREATE TABLE #replmonitor(status    INT NULL,warning    INT NULL,subscriber    sysname NULL,subscriber_db    sysname NULL,publisher_db    sysname NULL,
    publication    sysname NULL,publication_type    INT NULL,subtype    INT NULL,latency    INT NULL,latencythreshold    INT NULL,agentnotrunning    INT NULL,
    agentnotrunningthreshold    INT NULL,timetoexpiration    INT NULL,expirationthreshold    INT NULL,last_distsync    DATETIME,
    distribution_agentname    sysname NULL,mergeagentname    sysname NULL,mergesubscriptionfriendlyname    sysname NULL,mergeagentlocation    sysname NULL,
    mergeconnectiontype    INT NULL,mergePerformance    INT NULL,mergerunspeed    FLOAT,mergerunduration    INT NULL,monitorranking    INT NULL,
    distributionagentjobid    BINARY(16),mergeagentjobid    BINARY(16),distributionagentid    INT NULL,distributionagentprofileid    INT NULL,
    mergeagentid    INT NULL,mergeagentprofileid    INT NULL,logreaderagentname VARCHAR(100),publisher varchar(100))
    DECLARE replmonitor CURSOR FOR
    SELECT b.srvname,a.publisher_db,a.publication
    FROM distribution.dbo.MSpublications a,  master.dbo.sysservers b
    WHERE a.publisher_id=b.srvid
    OPEN replmonitor 
    FETCH NEXT FROM replmonitor INTO @srvname,@pub_db,@pubname
    WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
    BEGIN
    INSERT INTO #replmonitor
    EXEC distribution.dbo.sp_replmonitorhelpsubscription  @publisher = @srvname
         , @publisher_db = @pub_db
         ,  @publication = @pubname
         , @publication_type = 0
    FETCH NEXT FROM replmonitor INTO @srvname,@pub_db,@pubname
    END
    CLOSE replmonitor
    DEALLOCATE replmonitor
    SELECT publication,publisher_db,subscriber,subscriber_db,
            CASE publication_type WHEN 0 THEN 'Transactional publication'
                WHEN 1 THEN 'Snapshot publication'
                WHEN 2 THEN 'Merge publication'
                ELSE 'Not Known' END,
            CASE subtype WHEN 0 THEN 'Push'
                WHEN 1 THEN 'Pull'
                WHEN 2 THEN 'Anonymous'
                ELSE 'Not Known' END,
            CASE status WHEN 1 THEN 'Started'
                WHEN 2 THEN 'Succeeded'
                WHEN 3 THEN 'In progress'
                WHEN 4 THEN 'Idle'
                WHEN 5 THEN 'Retrying'
                WHEN 6 THEN 'Failed'
                ELSE 'Not Known' END,
            CASE warning WHEN 0 THEN 'No Issues in Replication' ELSE 'Check Replication' END,
            latency, latencythreshold, 
            'LatencyStatus'= CASE WHEN (latency > latencythreshold) THEN 'High Latency'
            ELSE 'No Latency' END,
            distribution_agentname,'DistributorStatus'= CASE WHEN (DATEDIFF(hh,last_distsync,GETDATE())>1) THEN 'Distributor has not executed more than n hour'
            ELSE 'Distributor running fine' END
            FROM #replmonitor
    --DROP TABLE #replmonitor
    Rajeev R

    INSERT INTO #replmonitor
    Hi Rajeev,
    Could you please use the following query and check if it is successful?
    INSERT INTO #replmonitor
    SELECT a.*
    FROM OPENROWSET
    ('SQLNCLI', 'Server=DBServer;Trusted_Connection=yes;',
    'SET FMTONLY OFF; exec distribution..sp_replmonitorhelpsubscription
    @publisher = DBServer,
    @publication_type = 0,
    @publication=MyPublication') AS a;
    There is a similar thread for your reference.
    https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/634090bf-915e-4d97-b71a-58cf47d62a8a/msg-8164-level-16-state-1-procedure-spmsloadtmpreplicationstatus-line-80?forum=sqlreplication
    Thanks,
    Lydia Zhang
    Lydia Zhang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Stateful Session Beans are not passivated / serialized when cache idle time

    Technology: Sun Application Server version 7.0.0_01; JDK 1.4.1; developed on Windows 2000; Tested on Sun Solaris.
    Initial error on Sun Solaris:
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr: Exception in thread "service-j2ee-25" org.omg.CORBA.OBJ_ADAPTER: vmcid: SUN minor code: 1015 completed: No
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.ee.internal.POA.GenericPOAServerSC.preinvoke(GenericPOAServerSC.java:389)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.ee.internal.POA.ServantCachePOAClientSC.initServant(ServantCachePOAClientSC.java:112)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.ee.internal.POA.ServantCachePOAClientSC.setOrb(ServantCachePOAClientSC.java:95)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.ee.internal.iiop.CDRInputStream_1_0.createDelegate(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:760)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.ee.internal.iiop.CDRInputStream_1_0.internalIORToObject(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:750)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.ee.internal.iiop.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:669)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.ee.internal.iiop.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_abstract_interface(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:890)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.ee.internal.iiop.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_abstract_interface(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:884)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.ee.internal.iiop.CDRInputStream.read_abstract_interface(CDRInputStream.java:307)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.se.internal.io.IIOPInputStream.readObjectDelegate(IIOPInputStream.java:228)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.se.internal.io.IIOPInputStream.readObjectOverride(IIOPInputStream.java:381)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:318)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.enterprise.iiop.IIOPHandleDelegate.getStub(IIOPHandleDelegate.java:58)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.enterprise.iiop.IIOPHandleDelegate.readEJBObject(IIOPHandleDelegate.java:38)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.ejb.portable.HandleImpl.readObject(HandleImpl.java:91)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.se.internal.io.IIOPInputStream.readObject(Native Method)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.se.internal.io.IIOPInputStream.invokeObjectReader(IIOPInputStream.java:1298)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.se.internal.io.IIOPInputStream.inputObject(IIOPInputStream.java:908)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.se.internal.io.IIOPInputStream.simpleReadObject(IIOPInputStream.java:261)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.se.internal.io.ValueHandlerImpl.readValueInternal(ValueHandlerImpl.java:247)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.se.internal.io.ValueHandlerImpl.readValue(ValueHandlerImpl.java:209)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.ee.internal.iiop.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_value(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:981)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.ee.internal.iiop.CDRInputStream.read_value(CDRInputStream.java:287)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.sun.corba.ee.internal.javax.rmi.CORBA.Util.copyObject(Util.java:598)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at javax.rmi.CORBA.Util.copyObject(Util.java:314)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.telstra.nodeman.ejb._NodeMaint_Stub.getHandle(Unknown Source)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.telstra.nodeman.arch.NMAViewBeanProxy.checkBeans(NMAViewBeanProxy.java:631)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.telstra.nodeman.view.html.NMAStandardButton.handleRequest(NMAStandardButton.java:143)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.telstra.nodeman.arch.NMAViewBeanBase.handleRequest(NMAViewBeanBase.java:1573)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.iplanet.jato.view.ViewBeanBase.dispatchInvocation(ViewBeanBase.java:824)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.iplanet.jato.view.ViewBeanBase.invokeRequestHandlerInternal(ViewBeanBase.java:637)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.iplanet.jato.view.ViewBeanBase.invokeRequestHandler(ViewBeanBase.java:595)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.iplanet.jato.ApplicationServletBase.dispatchRequest(ApplicationServletBase.java:772)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.iplanet.jato.ApplicationServletBase.processRequest(ApplicationServletBase.java:446)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.iplanet.jato.ApplicationServletBase.doPost(ApplicationServletBase.java:324)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.telstra.nodeman.view.ViewServlet.doPost(ViewServlet.java:243)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invokeServletService(StandardWrapperValve.java:720)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.access$000(StandardWrapperValve.java:118)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve$1.run(StandardWrapperValve.java:278)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:274)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:505)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:212)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:505)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:203)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:505)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.iplanet.ias.web.connector.nsapi.NSAPIProcessor.process(NSAPIProcessor.java:158)
    [10/Aug/2004:08:04:57] WARNING (17227): CORE3283: stderr:      at com.iplanet.ias.web.WebContainer.service(WebContainer.java:598)
    The above error caused the server to use all available memory and required a reboot to proceed.
    Subsequent testing against the Sun Appliucation Server 7 on Windows 2000 dev environment using the Sun Studio IDE for debugging and trace statements inserted in the code indicate that the Application Server is removing the Stateful Session Beans when they time out without an ejbPassivate event and without serializing the beans to the data-store. cache-idle-timeout-in-seconds set to 180 and removal-timeout-in-seconds set to 1800.
    The server.log indicates that the beans are timing out:
    [19/Aug/2004:18:15:10] WARNING ( 1664): [NRU-com.telstra.nodeman.ejb.AddressMaintBean]: IdleBeanCleanerTask finished after removing 2 idle beans
    Trace statements inserted in ejbPassivate do not appear in the log.
    It is my understanding that the above timeout should have caused an ejbPasssivate and serialization of the beans.
    The beans have been validated using Sun Java Studio Enterprise 6 with 'EJB validate'.
    My reading of the problem is that the beans are not being serialized and the error occurs when the application attempts to reference (getHandle) the bean after timeout.
    Any suggestions would be appreciated.

    Thanks Thorick.
    I am using NRU caching. WL 7.0 SP2.
    I have not defined idle-timeout-seconds in my weblogic-ejb-jar.xml. As I understand
    the default value for this is 600secs. So the ejbs should be removed after this
    time. Below is the
    weblogic-ejb-jar.xml that I am using.
    <!DOCTYPE weblogic-ejb-jar PUBLIC '-//BEA Systems, Inc.//DTD WebLogic 7.0.0 EJB//EN'
    'http://www.bea.com/servers/wls700/dtd/weblogic-ejb-jar.dtd'>
    <!-- Generated XML! -->
    <weblogic-ejb-jar>
    <weblogic-enterprise-bean>
    <ejb-name>Cart</ejb-name>
    <stateful-session-descriptor>
    <stateful-session-clustering>
    <home-is-clusterable>true</home-is-clusterable>
    <replication-type>InMemory</replication-type>
    </stateful-session-clustering>
    </stateful-session-descriptor>
    <transaction-descriptor>
         <trans-timeout-seconds>
              60
         </trans-timeout-seconds>
    </transaction-descriptor>
    <jndi-name>CartHome</jndi-name>
    </weblogic-enterprise-bean>
    </weblogic-ejb-jar>
    "thorick" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    The idle-timeout-seconds property controls the timeout/removal behavior.
    which stateful session cache type are you using ? LRUCache or NRUCache

  • Transactional replication very slow with indexes on Subscriber table

    I have setup Transactional Replication for one of our databases where one table with about 5mln records is replicated to a Subsriber database. With every replication about 500-600.000 changed records are send to the Subscriber.
    Since one month I see very strange behaviour when I add about 10 indexes to the Subscriber table. As soon as I have added the indexes replication speed becomes extremely slow (almost 3 hours for 600k records). As soon as I remove the indexes the replication
    is again very fast, about 3 minutes for the same amount of records.
    I've searched a lot on the internet to solve this issue but can't find any explaination for this strange behaviour after adding the indexes. As far as I know it doesn't have to be a problem to add indexes to a Subscriber table, and it hasn't been before on
    another replication configuration we use.
    Some information from the Replication Log:
    With indexes on the Subscriber table
    Total Run Time (ms) : 9589938 Total Work Time : 9586782
    Total Num Trans : 3 Num Trans/Sec : 0.00
    Total Num Cmds : 616245 Num Cmds/Sec : 64.28
    Total Idle Time : 0 
    Writer Thread Stats
    Total Number of Retries : 0 
    Time Spent on Exec : 9580752 
    Time Spent on Commits (ms): 2687 Commits/Sec : 0.00
    Time to Apply Cmds (ms) : 9586782 Cmds/Sec : 64.28
    Time Cmd Queue Empty (ms) : 5499 Empty Q Waits > 10ms: 172
    Total Time Request Blk(ms): 5499 
    P2P Work Time (ms) : 0 P2P Cmds Skipped : 0
    Reader Thread Stats
    Calls to Retrieve Cmds : 2 
    Time to Retrieve Cmds (ms): 10378 Cmds/Sec : 59379.94
    Time Cmd Queue Full (ms) : 9577919 Full Q Waits > 10ms : 6072
    Without indexes on the Subscriber table
    Total Run Time (ms) : 89282 Total Work Time : 88891
    Total Num Trans : 3 Num Trans/Sec : 0.03
    Total Num Cmds : 437324 Num Cmds/Sec : 4919.78
    Total Idle Time : 0 
    Writer Thread Stats
    Total Number of Retries : 0 
    Time Spent on Exec : 86298 
    Time Spent on Commits (ms): 282 Commits/Sec : 0.03
    Time to Apply Cmds (ms) : 88891 Cmds/Sec : 4919.78
    Time Cmd Queue Empty (ms) : 1827 Empty Q Waits > 10ms: 113
    Total Time Request Blk(ms): 1827 
    P2P Work Time (ms) : 0 P2P Cmds Skipped : 0
    Reader Thread Stats
    Calls to Retrieve Cmds : 2 
    Time to Retrieve Cmds (ms): 2812 Cmds/Sec : 155520.63
    Time Cmd Queue Full (ms) : 86032 Full Q Waits > 10ms : 4026
    Can someone please help me with this issue? Any ideas? 
    Pim 

    Hi Megens:
    Insert statement might be slow with not only indexes and few others things too
    0) SQL DB Blocking during inserts
    1) If any insert triggers are existed
    2) Constraints - if any
    3) Index fragmentation
    4) Page splits / fill factor
    Without indexes inserts will be fast because, each time when new row going to insert to the table, SQL Server will do
    1) it will check for the room, if no room page splits will happen and record will placed at right place
    2) Once the record updated all the index should be update
    3) all these extra update work will cause can make insert statement bit slow
    Its better to have index maintenance jobs frequently to avoid fragmentation.
    If every thing is clear on SQL Server Side, you need look up on DISK IO, N/W Latency between the servers and so on
    Thanks,
    Thanks, Satish Kumar. Please mark as this post as answered if my anser helps you to resolves your issue :)

  • Increase  idle log out time of IC WebClient to 60 minutes

    Hello All,
    We are in the process of implementing ICWC for CRM 5.0.
    After we open the CIC screen via transaction: CRM_IC; and remain idle for some time, the system automatically logs out of the CIC screen.
    We want the system to log out of ICWC screen only when the the screen has been idle for 60 minutes.
    Please guide me to do this.
    Regards,
    Khushboo

    Thanks for your prompt response Sudipta.
    I used TCode: SMICM and navigated to the said parameter: icm/keep_alive_timeout but there is no way I can change that parameter.
    As a workaround I used transaction RZ10 to assign the new value to icm/keep_alive_timeout parameter. But the change is not reflected in SMICM TCode. Please guide how to change the parameter value.
    Regards,
    Khushboo

  • NON-transactional session bean access entity bean

    We are currently profiling our product using Borland OptmizeIt tool, and we
    found some interesting issues. Due to our design, we have many session beans which
    are non transactional, and these session beans will access entity beans to do
    the reading operations, such as getWeight, getRate, since it's read only, there
    is no need to do transaction commit stuff which really takes time, this could
    be seen through the profile. I know weblogic support readonly entity bean, but
    it seems that it only has benefit on ejbLoad call, my test program shows that
    weblogic still creates local transaction even I specified it as transaction not
    supported, and Transaction.commit() will always be called in postInvoke(), from
    the profile, we got that for a single method call, such as getRate(), 80% time
    spent on postInvoke(), any suggestion on this? BTW, most of our entity beans are
    using Exclusive lock, that's the reason that we use non-transactional session
    bean to avoid dead lock problem.
    Thanks

    Slava,
    Thanks for the link, actually I read it before, and following is what I extracted
    it from the doc:
    <weblogic-doc>
    Do not set db-is-shared to "false" if you set the entity bean's concurrency
    strategy to the "Database" option. If you do, WebLogic Server will ignore the
    db-is-shared setting.
    </weblogic-doc>
    Thanks
    "Slava Imeshev" <[email protected]> wrote:
    Hi Jinsong,
    You may want to read this to get more detailed explanation
    on db-is-shared (cache-between-transactions for 7.0):
    http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs61/ejb/EJB_environment.html#1127563
    Let me know if you have any questions.
    Regards,
    Slava Imeshev
    "Jinsong HU" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    Thanks.
    But it's still not clear to me in db-is-shared setting, if I specifiedentity
    lock as database lock, I assumed db-is-shared is useless, because foreach
    new
    transaction, entity bean will reload data anyway. Correct me if I amwrong.
    Jinsong
    "Slava Imeshev" <[email protected]> wrote:
    Jinsong,
    See my answers inline.
    "Jinsong Hu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    Hi Slava,
    Thanks for your reply, actually, I agree with you, we need to
    review
    our db
    schema and seperate business logic to avoid db lock. I can not say,guys,
    we need
    to change this and that, since it's a big application and developedsince
    EJB1.0
    spec, I think they are afraid to do such a big change.Total rewrite is the worst thing that can happen to an app. The
    better aproach would be identifying the most critical piece and
    make a surgery on it.
    Following are questions in my mind:
    (1) I think there should be many companies using weblogic serverto
    develop
    large enterprise applications, I am just wondering what's the maintransaction/lock
    mechanism that is used? Transional session / database lock,
    db-is-shared
    entity
    I can't say for the whole community, as for my experience the standard
    usage patthern is session fasades calling Entity EJBs while having
    Required TX attribute plus plain transacted JDBC calls for bulk
    reads or inserts.
    is the dominant one? It seems that if you speficy database lock,
    the
    db-is-shared
    should be true, right?Basically it's not true. One will need db-is-shared only if thereare
    changes
    to the database done from outside of the app server.
    (2) For RO bean, if I specify read-idle-timeout to 0, it shouldonly
    load
    once at the first use time, right?I assume read-timeout-seconds was meant. That's right, but if
    an application constantly reads new RO data, RO beans will be
    constantly dropped from cache and new ones will be loaded.
    You may want to looks at server console to see if there's a lot
    of passivation for RO beans.
    (3) For clustering part, have anyone use it in real enterpriseapplication?
    My concern, since database lock is the only way to choose, how aboutthe
    affect
    of ejbLoad to performance, since most transactions are short live,if high
    volume
    transactions are in processing, I am just scared to death about
    the
    ejbLoad overhead.
    ejbLoad is a part of bean's lifecycle, how would you be scared ofit?
    If ejbLoads take too much time, it could be a good idea to profile
    used SQLs. Right index optimization can make huge difference.
    Also you may want cosider using CMP beans to let weblogic
    take care about load optimization.
    (4) If using Optimization lock, all the ejbStore need to do
    version
    check
    or timestamp check, right? How about this overhead?As for optimistic concurrency, it performs quite well as you can
    use lighter isolation levels.
    HTH,
    Slava Imeshev
    "Jinsong Hu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    We are using Exclusive Lock for entity bean, because of we do
    not
    want
    to
    load
    data in each new transaction. If we use Database lock, that means
    we
    dedicate
    data access calls to database, if database deadlock happens,
    it's
    hard
    to
    detect,
    while using Exclusive lock, we could detect this dead lock in
    container
    level.
    The problem is, using Exclusive concurrency mode you serialize
    access to data represented by the bean. This aproach has negative
    effect on ablity of application to process concurrent requests.As
    a
    result the app may have performance problems under load.
    Actually, at the beginnning, we did use database lock and usingtransactional
    The fact that you had database deadlocking issues tells that
    application logic / database schema may need some review.
    Normally to avoid deadlocking it's good to group database
    operations mixing in updattes and inserts into one place so
    that db locking sequence is not spreaded in time. Moving to
    forced serialized data access just hides design/implementation
    problems.
    session bean, but the database dead lock and frequent ejbLoad
    really
    kill
    us,
    so we decided to move to use Exclusive lock and to avoid dead
    lock,
    we
    change
    some session bean to non-transactional.Making session beans non-transactions makes container
    creating short-living transactions for each call to entity bean
    methods. It's a costly process and it puts additional load to
    both container and database.
    We could use ReadOnly lock for some entity beans, but since weblogicserver will
    always create local transaction for entity bean, and we found
    transaction
    commit
    is expensive, I am arguing why do we need create container leveltransaction for
    read only bean.First, read-only beans still need to load data. Also, you may seeRO
    beans
    contanly loading data if db-is-shared set to true. Other reason
    can
    be
    that
    RO semantics is not applicable the data presented by RO bean (forinstance,
    you have a reporting engine that constantly produces "RO" data,
    while
    application-consumer of that data retrieves only new data and neverasks
    for "old" data). RO beans are good when there is a relatively stable
    data
    accessed repeatedly for read only access.
    You may want to tell us more about your app, we may be of help.
    Regards,
    Slava Imeshev
    I will post the performance data, let's see how costful
    transaction.commit
    is.
    "Cameron Purdy" <[email protected]> wrote:
    We are currently profiling our product using Borland
    OptmizeIt
    tool,
    and we
    found some interesting issues. Due to our design, we have
    many
    session
    beans which
    are non transactional, and these session beans will access
    entity
    beans
    to
    do
    the reading operations, such as getWeight, getRate, since
    it's
    read
    only,
    there
    is no need to do transaction commit stuff which really takes
    time,
    this
    could
    be seen through the profile. I know weblogic support readonly
    entity
    bean,
    but
    it seems that it only has benefit on ejbLoad call, my test
    program
    shows
    that
    weblogic still creates local transaction even I specified
    it
    as
    transaction not
    supported, and Transaction.commit() will always be called
    in
    postInvoke(),
    from
    the profile, we got that for a single method call, such as
    getRate(),
    80%
    time
    spent on postInvoke(), any suggestion on this? BTW, most of
    our
    entity
    beans are
    using Exclusive lock, that's the reason that we use
    non-transactional
    session
    bean to avoid dead lock problem.I am worried that you have made some decisions based on an improper
    understand of what WebLogic is doing.
    First, you say "non transactional", but from your description
    you
    should
    have those marked as tx REQUIRED to avoid multiple transactions
    (since
    non-transactional just means that the database operation becomesits
    own
    little transaction).
    Second, you say you are using exclusive lock, which you shouldonly
    use
    if
    you are absolutely sure that you need it, (and note that it
    does
    not
    work in
    a cluster).
    Peace,
    Cameron Purdy
    Tangosol, Inc.
    http://www.tangosol.com/coherence.jsp
    Tangosol Coherence: Clustered Replicated Cache for Weblogic
    "Jinsong Hu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >

  • Connected to an idle instance; trouble creating DB

    I tried to connect to my database and got Connected to an idle instance:
    C:\>sqlplus / as sysdba
    SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.2.0 Production on Mon Sep 22 19:07:34 2014
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2010, Oracle.  All rights reserved.
    Connected to an idle instance.
    SQL> select status, database_status from v$instance;
    select status, database_status from v$instance
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
    Process ID: 0
    Session ID: 0 Serial number: 0
    Further, the Getting Started page cannot be found with Error code: ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED: http://127.0.0.1:8080/apex/f?p=4950
    What I did to try and resolve this issue
    While digging in various forums, I found that maybe I needed to specify the initXE.ora file on startup:
    SQL> startup pfile='C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server\database\initXE.ora'
    ORA-01565: error in identifying file 'C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server\dbs/spfileXE.ora'
    ORA-27041: unable to open file
    OSD-04002: unable to open file
    O/S-Error: (OS 2) The system cannot find the file specified.
    ORA-01078: failure in processing system parameters
    No such spfileXE.ora file. OK, so create it?
    SQL> create spfile='C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server\dbs\spfileXE.ora' from pfile='C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server\dbs\init.ora';
    File created.
    SQL> startup pfile='C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server\database\initXE.ora'
    ORA-48108: invalid value given for the diagnostic_dest init.ora parameter
    ORA-48140: the specified ADR Base directory does not exist [C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server\DATABASE\<ORACLE_BASE>]
    ORA-48187: specified directory does not exist
    OSD-00002: additional error information
    O/S-Error: (OS 123) The filename, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect.
    SQL>
    Well, I guess I have no ADR Base directory..
    C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server\database>dir
    Volume in drive C is Windows
    Volume Serial Number is 8822-A545
    Directory of C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server\database
    22/09/2014  06:06 PM    <DIR>          .
    22/09/2014  06:06 PM    <DIR>          ..
    22/09/2014  06:06 PM             2,048 hc_xe.dat
    22/09/2014  02:44 PM                73 initXE.ora
    27/08/2011  09:58 AM            31,744 oradba.exe
    22/09/2014  05:07 PM             2,265 oradim.log
                   4 File(s)         36,130 bytes
                   2 Dir(s)  298,041,913,344 bytes free
    I list as much supporting information as I know how to below.
    Environment
    Windows 7 Enterprise, SP1, 64-bit.
    Oracle Database Express Edition 11g Release 2 for Windows x32
    I have these environment variables set:
    echo %ORACLE_SID% - %ORACLE_HOME%
    XE - C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server
    Installation settings
    These are the installation settings used by the installer:
    Destination Folder: C:\oraclexe\
    Oracle Home: C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server\
    Oracle Base:C:\oraclexe\
    Port for 'Oracle Database Listener': 1521
    Port for 'Oracle Services for Microsoft Transaction Server': 2030
    Port for 'Oracle HTTP Listener': 8080
    Output from lsnrctl stat
    Some debugging information that may be useful:
    C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server\bin>lsnrctl stat
    LSNRCTL for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production on 22-SEP-2014 19:05:52
    Copyright (c) 1991, 2010, Oracle.  All rights reserved.
    Connecting to (DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=IPC)(KEY=EXTPROC1)))
    STATUS of the LISTENER
    Alias                     LISTENER
    Version                   TNSLSNR for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
    Start Date                22-SEP-2014 17:07:02
    Uptime                    0 days 1 hr. 58 min. 49 sec
    Trace Level               off
    Security                  ON: Local OS Authentication
    SNMP                      OFF
    Default Service           XE
    Listener Parameter File   C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server\network\admin\listener.ora
    Listener Log File         C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\diag\tnslsnr\ITS57151\listener\alert\log.xml
    Listening Endpoints Summary...
      (DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=ipc)(PIPENAME=\\.\pipe\EXTPROC1ipc)))
      (DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=myhost.mycompany.local)(PORT=1521)))
    Services Summary...
    Service "CLRExtProc" has 1 instance(s).
      Instance "CLRExtProc", status UNKNOWN, has 1 handler(s) for this service...
    Service "PLSExtProc" has 1 instance(s).
      Instance "PLSExtProc", status UNKNOWN, has 1 handler(s) for this service...
    The command completed successfully
    C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server\bin>
    Various config files
    Here are the contents of other important files.
    The initXE.ora file - C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server\database\initXE.ora
    SPFILE='C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server\dbs/spfileXE.ora'
    The listener.ora file - C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server\network\ADMIN\listener.ora
    SID_LIST_LISTENER =
      (SID_LIST =
        (SID_DESC =
          (SID_NAME = PLSExtProc)
          (ORACLE_HOME = C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server)
          (PROGRAM = extproc)
        (SID_DESC =
          (SID_NAME = CLRExtProc)
          (ORACLE_HOME = C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server)
          (PROGRAM = extproc)
    LISTENER =
      (DESCRIPTION_LIST =
        (DESCRIPTION =
          (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = IPC)(KEY = EXTPROC1))
          (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = myhost.mycompany.local)(PORT = 1521))
    DEFAULT_SERVICE_LISTENER = (XE)
    The tnsnames.ora file - C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\11.2.0\server\network\ADMIN\tnsnames.ora
    XE =
      (DESCRIPTION =
        (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = myhost.mycompany.local)(PORT = 1521))
        (CONNECT_DATA =
          (SERVER = DEDICATED)
          (SERVICE_NAME = XE)
    EXTPROC_CONNECTION_DATA =
      (DESCRIPTION =
        (ADDRESS_LIST =
          (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = IPC)(KEY = EXTPROC1))
        (CONNECT_DATA =
          (SID = PLSExtProc)
          (PRESENTATION = RO)
    ORACLR_CONNECTION_DATA =
      (DESCRIPTION =
        (ADDRESS_LIST =
          (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = IPC)(KEY = EXTPROC1))
        (CONNECT_DATA =
          (SID = CLRExtProc)
          (PRESENTATION = RO)
    Edited to restructure question to put the meat of the issue up front and supporting information below.

    Uninstall Oracle Database Express Edition 11g Release 2 for Windows x32
    Download and install Oracle Database Express Edition 11g Release 2 for Windows x64
    Take some time to de-stress.

  • Lock user ID which are kept idle for more than 30 mints.

    Dear All,
    My requirement is as follows.I need one batch job to lock all user IDs in producrtion system if the user Id is kept idle for more than 30 mints.
    Can you pls let me know how I can do it and under which tables the user Ids are stored and is there any standard program that I can use to fullfill my requirement.
    Thanks to all of you for your support.
    Rgds,
    Babu

    Dear,
    First suggestion - contact your BASIS team.
    Secondly, please check the below:
    Logging off the inactive users is not set up by default. Setting up the feature of logging off the users improves the security as unattended terminals do not stay active indefinitely.
    To activate automatic logging off, do the following:
    Go to Profile Maintenance by choosing Tools --> CCMS --> Configuration  --> Profile Maintenance or the transaction RZ11.
    Maintain the parameter rdisp/gui_auto_logout. Enter the required number of seconds of inactivity before the user is logged off automatically.
    To deactivate automatic logoff, delete the parameter from the profile(s) or set the value '0'.
    Regards,
    Syed Hussain.

  • Error triggering EDI subsystem (GIS): Process request without transaction.

    I'm trying to configure SAP to trigger the EDI subsytem (Sterling's GIS).  I'm getting error status "20":
    Error for Remote Function Call with port "GIS"
    Error message from RFC_REMOTE_EXEC
    Process request without transaction. TID is empty.
    Does anyone know what this means?
    Thank you,

    Here is the SAPSuite Adapter Config in GIS:
    Service Name                     COMP_SapSuiteALE 
    Service Type                     SAP Suite Adapter   
    Description                      ALE based IDoc XFer  
    System Name                      COMP_SapSuiteALE  
    Group                            None provided 
    SAP Integration Mode             ALE based IDoc 
    SAP system is loadbalanced       No   
    Client                           300   
    User                             sapadmin  
    Language                         EN   
    Code Page                        1100   
    Start RFC Server automatically   Yes  
    RFC Server Instances             1  
    Program ID                       GISR3D 
    Outbound Process to start        COMP_SAPOutboundALE   
    Outbound Encoding                UTF8  
    Wait for synchronous RFC Outbound response   Yes   
    Response timeout (seconds, 0=unlimited)   0   
    Delete TIDs automatically        Yes   
    Delete TIDs after (days)         30   
    Register Remote Function Calls (BAPI or RFC Mode only)   None (for IDoc modes or BAPI/RFC Inbound)   
    Filter online RFC list by        None provided   
    Use hard max. connections limit ( Off = soft limit )   No   
    Max. Connections                           4   
    Soft Limit Delay Time (seconds)            20   
    Connection Check Interval (seconds)        30  
    Connection Idle Time (seconds)             240   
    Close session after maximum session time   No   
    Max. Session Time (minutes)                20   
    User                                       admin

Maybe you are looking for