Image rotationY, scaling issue

Can anyone tell me why in example #1, the image, when rotated (by -45 degrees on y axis), is scaled properly, but in example #2, it's stretched so it's wider than it should be? the main difference is, in example #1, the carousel items consist of an image within a movieclip; whereas, in example #2, the carousel items consist of an image within a movieclip, within a movieclip.
(the main reason i switched each item to be the image, within a movieclip, within a moveclip, was so that when you nagivate through the items, and hover over the larger item in focus, it rotates so that it remains upright & parallel with the screen. if i kept it like example #1, the movieclip would rotate based on the axis of the carousel container (it wouldn't always be upright & parallel with the screen)
example #1
example #2
my theory is it has to do with the perspective and/or items being 3d or not (having a matrix3D object)..but i need a push in the right direction..thanks!

hi,
the process which u followed is correct but the thing is u hv forget to enable the check box called "embedded image"........ which will be present in the image properties.......... if u enable this check box then the image will be displayed in pdf preview.
I hope i solved the issue.
Thnx,
Vishnu

Similar Messages

Image Field - Scaling Issue

Hi,
I'm using Interactive Forms for priting sales orders. For each line item I display a small product image in an image field. For this image field I use the setting "Sizing - Scale Image Proportionally". If I use this form as a print form evrything works fine, the image is being scaled correctly. But if I use it as an interactive form (parameter /1BCDWB/DOCPARAMS-FILLABLE = 'X' ) the following occurs:
The image is being resized to fit into the image field. It looks like using "Sizing - Scale Image to Fit Rectangle". The funny thing: If I use a default image for this field, it is being displayed correctly in the "Body Pages" tab, but not in the "PDF Preview". It's only being scaled proportionally if in the form properties the preview type is "Print Form" (or parameter /1BCDWB/DOCPARAMS-FILLABLE = ' ' ).
In my eyes it looks like an ADS issue. But maybe somebody of you got an idea how I could fix that problem.
Thanks & regards,
Matthias

hi,
the process which u followed is correct but the thing is u hv forget to enable the check box called "embedded image"........ which will be present in the image properties.......... if u enable this check box then the image will be displayed in pdf preview.
I hope i solved the issue.
Thnx,
Vishnu

Image scaling issues

I am using a 1280x720 PNG for the background in my Flash movie, but when I play it in fullscreen the image looks like crap. What's the best way to make images still look good when the movie is scaled up? Should I use a 1920x1080 PNG and scale it down instead?

Let me help you understand.
Resampling occurs even without scaling on any bitmaps with smoothing enabled. A pixel level detail loss is noticable immediately, pixels are resampled until blurred.
Without turning on smoothing, the original image has no original resampling applied. Scaling performs a cleaner nearest neighbor resample that preserves hard pixels. At original size and while upscaling this produces a much cleaner result. While pixel edges are less resampled (upscale blur) the detail is still intact.
While turning smoothing on, the original image is immediately resampled (bilinear, trilinear, bicubic, etc). The pixel detail loss is immediately obvious even at original scale. This blurring helps during rotation and reduction but during upscale the amount of resampling get heavier and heavier until the image is excessively blurred. The only slight benefit is edges appear smoother, but the reality is the edges are blurred to death. This is why it very limitedly helps to some people but really doesn't help at all.
Here's an example of a small choice piece of a free Harley poster showing the effects of smoothing at original and 200% scales. An additional small portion of the original image is scaled 3x (nearest neighbor resampling (no smoothing)) to illustrate the difference in pixels even at original scale. The detail loss, while much less at original size, is still visible with smoothing.
Example Image
The top 3 images are with smoothing enabled. It's immediately obvious the level of blur is pretty harsh on the original image. The zoom-in shows the pixel blurring compared to the image with no smoothing below it. Color is shifted and muddied from bright to dark very noticably.
The upscaled image is where the real destruction takes place. The curved tire, angled spokes and spring are the most harsh environment for nearest neighbor scale. Smoothing has blurred them so much in the resample they appear a lot smoother. Only it's so blurry you can barely look at the picture without your eyes watering. To a photographer, this is a throw-away photo, far too out of focus.
The bottom image shows no smoothing enabled. The original size bitmap retains a great deal more pixel clarity and detail. The 300% zoomed image shows much brighter, more accurate colors having not been resampled. During the upscale the pixels are only nearest neighbor therefore you can see the extremely slight anti-aliasing performed. Hard pixels stand out more, much more true to the original image. Highlights on metals are still bright, colors are more accurate and more pixel level detail is exposed and enlarged. While edge enhancement would be nice, it looks far better without blurring the details and colors out of existence.
Therefore smoothing really doesn't help upscale or even original size without pixel and color destruction. The best option is not to require Flash to perform any scaling on a bitmap unless edge-only resampling becomes available. The small benefit it gives is working with a far less quality bitmap which might render some slight performance advantages in memory ops for huge images. At the loss of detail, this is arguably more of disadvantage than advantage.

Graphics scaling issues in Flash Builder 4.5.1

Please review this screen shot. Details follow the image.
FB 4.5.1
applicationDPI = "160"
Graphics using MultiDPIBitmapSource scale fairly well.
Graphics used for these properties do not scale well at all:
1) ViewMenuItem's "icon" property.
2) List itemRenderer IconItemRenderer "decorator" property.
3) TabbedViewNavigatorApplication's "splashScreenImage" property.
These graphics assets end up with horrible scaling artifacts, making them unusable. So, I cannot use icons with Menus or Lists or a splash image.
I've reviewed all of Adobe's documentation and followed all of their recommendations for creating graphics assets for use in a mobile applications. Simple graphics with no curved lines or angles less than 90 degrees scale well. Anything else does not.
Attached is a screen shot comparing the scaling issues at 160, 240 and 320 dpi with applicationDPI = "160". It is using an FXG graphic created in Illustrator CS5.5.
The FXG graphic was embedded in the s:IconItemRenderer like this: decorator = "{images.arrow_list_icon}".
For testing purposes, I also tried switching the decorator at runtime based on the applicationDPI, but of course this fails as the application still scales the graphic whenever the application's applicationDPI property is specified.
<s:List>
<s:itemRenderer>
<fx:Component>
<s:IconItemRenderer
decorator = "{chooseDecorator()}"
<fx:Script>
//This code selects a different FXG asset based on the DPI reported at runtime.
import images.arrow_list_icon160;
import images.arrow_list_icon240;
import images.arrow_list_icon320;
import mx.core.FlexGlobals;
protected function chooseDecorator():Class {
    var rtnVal:Class;
    switch (FlexGlobals.topLevelApplication.runtimeDPI) {
        case mx.core.DPIClassification.DPI_160:
            rtnVal=images.arrow_list_icon160;
            break;
        case mx.core.DPIClassification.DPI_240:
            rtnVal=images.arrow_list_icon240;
            break;
        case mx.core.DPIClassification.DPI_320:
            rtnVal=images.arrow_list_icon320;
            break;
    return rtnVal;
</fx:Script>
Has anyone come up with methods which can be used to avoid scaling issues with these items when setting the applicationDPI property?

Chances are that you'll get better answers for this question on the Flex general discussion forum. This forum is visited more by engineers on the tooling team while the latter has people from the Flex SDK team.
-Anirudh

Placing Images and PPI issues

Hello, I am new to InDesign.. I am a digital artist who has only used PS in the past, so I'm used to manipulating images however I like concerning PPI, DPI, and pixels. I am now creating an app for ipad use and created the background images for the pages in PS. Now, I'm placing them into ID. When I do that, no matter what I have the file saved as, it converts the image to a different ppi.
When I created the images in PS, I used the standard ipad resolution (262px) and dimensions. When I created the ID file, I used the standard ipad dimensions and the ppi is obviously much lower, at 72?
Is there a way to set the ID resolution, or do I need to create my documents with only 72ppi? This doesn't seem like it would give the best image viewing available on the ipad.
Thank you!

InDesign respects the original size and resolution of images, as long as you keep them at 100% of the original size. When they are at 100%, the "Actual ppi" and "Effective ppi" fields of the Info panel display the same value. In your specific case, the Info panel needs to show "262" in both fields. If not, it means that the respective image is scaled. To verify its scale, click the image using the Direct Selection Tool (the "white arrow" one) and look at the percentage fields in the Control Panel. (By the way, the resolution of the retina iPads is 264 ppi, not 262.)
When importing an image, the easiest way to assure that it will be placed at 100% is simply clicking the loaded cursor instead of dragging it. Give it a try.
But bear in mind that this "ppi" issue only matters for print publications. For tablet apps, what is important is the number of pixels; the resolution is irrelevant. For retina iPads, you need to use twice the size you use in a standard screen iPad. So, if you want a full-page image in an old iPad, the image dimensions must be 1024 by 768 pixels. If you want the same image in full screen on a retina iPad, create it with 2048 by 1536 pixels. You'll get a better explanation here: http://www.planetquark.com/2012/03/14/132-ppi-72-dpi-264-ppi-what-image-resolution-should- you-use-the-for-new-ipad/#.UhdbsLwWFL8

Scaling issue going from computer to flat screen tv.

I have a client that has shot thousands of pictures from his world travels over the years some in the raw format some in jpeg. He created a slide show in Photoshop Elements of the pictures and when he shows them through his computer onto his large Toshiba HD flat screen some of them come out jagged (doesn't matter if they are jpeg or raw). I am assuming it is a scaling issue causing this. Question can some one please give me the right instructions on how to go about fixing this so all of his pictures come out crystal clear on his flat screen? Thanks.

What is the current pixel dimension of the images that are causing the issue?
Richard Lynch

Classic tween scaling issue

I have two jpeg images that are converted to movie clip symbols. When attempting to scale one from zero out to infinity (zoom out look), I apply the classic tween and the image zooms out above the top of my document window instead of going straight out. Is there something I can troubleshoot to fix this? I belive the registration point on the symbol is in the center, but how can I confirm?

Hey, the best bet would be what the above poster said, click on your symbol and push Q to select the Free Transform tool and change the registration point to fit in the center. If you're having any scaling issues using tweens I'd just remove the tween and try again, I find tweening always buggy.
-Travis

How do I fix this printer scaling issue?

Copied from my post on Experts Exchange...
I have a client running an OS X Server with Snow Leopard 10.6. Their office has iMacs and they print a variety of formats (PDF, DWG) from different programs.
The problem is that the prints are not scaling properly. When set to a certain scale, the measured print is off by 2% or so.
They also run Windows 7 in a virtualized machine via Parallels, and they are not experiencing the problem through windows.
The printer in question is an Epson Stylus Photo 1400. It is connected directly to the OS X Server via USB. The printer is then shared via Server Admin using all protocols.
On a client Mac OS X machine, I add the printer through System Preferences, Printers, and select the printer. When adding, I use the Gutenprint driver for this particular printer because for whatever reason, the standard driver will not print correctly (prints half-way, wrong size, etc.).
I have tried restarting the Print Server, removing and re-adding the printer with the same driver, updating the Gutenprint drivers from 5.2.3 to 5.2.7. I even deleted a CUPS plist file thinking it would do something but apparently not.
The prints used to print just fine. I don't know what to try as I am exhausting the research solutions I have found thus far online.
Any help is greatly appreciated.

In addition to Matt's suggestions, check what driver is being used on the server. If the Epson driver is being used on the server but the clients are having to use Gutenprint as you have mentioned, then this can also cause scaling issues. So if you can create the server queue using the Gutenprint driver (for some printers this can be tricky) then this can help. And with this queue using the Gutenprint driver I would then try printing a PDF directly from the OS X server to see if the same scaling issue occurs. If the server prints without the 2% reduction then you can concentrate on the client.
And for the client, as a test, I would also try connecting the printer directly to a client Mac via USB and also see if the same scaling issue occurs. But ensure you do use the settings Matt has suggested, because the scale to fit does catch out a lot of users.

Scaling issues with Windows 8.1 and 3200x1800 displays?

What about scaling issues with CS6 Illustrator and Photoshop? I have a hidpi 3200x1800 13" laptop with win 8.1 and can't use the software because of the tiny text.
Thanks,
PK
Sent from my iPhone

CS6 was released before HiDpi displays were common and there are no adjustments in that program.
You can try going into Preferences > Interface and changing the UI Font Size to Large.
You could also try lowering your display resolution until is decently readable.
Another step is joining Creative Cloud. Photoshop CC 2014 has 200% UI Scaling.
$50/month for all apps or $10/month for Photoshop/Lightroom.
There are intro and educational offers if you can get on them.
Gene

QHD+ Resolution Scaling Issues Windows 8

I've read that QHD+ resolution monitors like the Dell Precision m3800 with a 3200x1800 resolution screen are having scaling issues with Windows 8, and even 8.1. Some programs scale correctly, but I have specifically heard Adobe programs including Adobe After Effects do NOT scale correctly.
Are there plans to fix this with the next Windows release? Or a patch before then?
Any rough estimate as to when that would be?
Does it work at the moment to scale the monitor down to a lower resolution to fix it? Is it in fact tested and not just assumed. (I have no way of checking and can't get a straight answer)
I want to buy this laptop soon, but I need it for After Effects and if it's not usable, it won't be a good buy. Would love to have some concret answers!
Thanks!
Kim

The CC versions of Adobe programs support high-DPI displays, but not older ones. If you use an older version, this won't change. Nobody goes back to old code.
Mylenium

Surface Pro 3, Remote Desktop, multiple monitors, Windows 8.1 DPI scaling issues

I have been evaluating Surface Pro 3 and once of the attributes is the display. Here is the description of the environment and the remote desktop display issue.
Surface Pro 3 (Windows 8.1 with latest firmware and Windows updates) has 12 inch built-in screen with native resolution 2160x1440. The Surface is docked and an external monitor (native resolution 1920x1080) is connected to the docking stations. The
display configuration doesn't allow for different scaling for each monitor, single scaling value is used for multiple monitors. This is an issue as the recommended scaling of 150% is optimal for small built-in screen of Surface but it is not optimal for
large screens of external monitors. Also this scaling is "inherited" by a remote desktop session which results in objects being too large on the remote desktop sessions or sometimes even blurry/fuzzy.
Can the blurriness/fuzziness of the remote desktop session be resolved?
Z

Hi Colin,
Thanks for the response. I installed the latest firmware and patches about a week ago and the scaling issue improved. It is not optimal yet as some graphical elements are still out of proportions but I do not want to spent more resources on this subject
anymore.
Best regards,
Zbysek
Z

Orgchart export to image: special characters issue

Hello,
Using Orgchart Accelerated 2.01.
We have an issue when exporting to image. The issue happens when org unit name or attributes contains some special characters like é or ë (common in French). In the jpg export, these characters are being replaced by some square characters. In the preview and in the application, everything is displaying just fine.
This doesn't happen for ppt export (pdf export still not functionning)
Thanks,
Laurent

HI Laurent,
This is quite unusual. As far as I am aware the OrgChart Accelerated solution only supports English at present. However, you should raise an OSS message via Service Marketplace as I would expect it to export these characters okay.
Many thanks,
Luke

Random Image PHP Scipt Issue

I am using a
PHP random image
script on a site in which I have 2 different images on each
templated page (random images throgh a site). The two images call
to 2 different folders with the random image script in them (to get
2 distinct images). Thus, 2 different random images. My issue is
that it seems that most browsers at some point do not call for a
new image but use what was there in the last page as it is the same
name:
http://ansano.com/asl/images/random/top/random_image.php
or
http://ansano.com/asl/images/random/bottom/random_image.php
Any idea of how to force a browser to call the PHP script? Or
how to change it so it works site wide?
Thanks!!

I've now been sitting looking for this for a while. I don't seem to be able to get it to work.
Do I need to host to a folder first and then to the FTP server after?
I don't seen to be able to find the new page (TEST PAGE) in the folder I used to publish the site to before I went online. Tried searching for it in finder but I don't get any results on (TESTPAGEfiles).
I can see what you are talking bout I only publish to a local folder but I want to publish via the FTP option in iWeb.
Thank you very much for helping me

GetURL _blank: scaling issues

I have the following in Flash 8
BriefLook_mc.btnStudentLife_mc.onRelease = function():Void
this.createEmptyMovieClip("craveLoader_mc",
this.getNextHighestDepth());
this.craveLoader_mc.getURL("BWC_Crave.swf",
"_blank");
This opens a new window for BWC_Crave.swf ...like I want. But
the window scales depending on my current window sizing. If I make
my window bigger or smaller, it sizes the flash movie in the
window. I want it to be a static size. What am I doing wrong? My
publish setting are set at 100% with "no scaling" set for both swf
files.
When I publish the called swf file bwc_crave.swf, it works as
intended. When I load this file with getURL, that is when the
scaling issues arise. Any clues?

Why are you creating an empty movie clip?
You should place your "Crave.swf" file into a HTML page the
way you want it and then insert javascript into the <head>
tags to resize the page on load.
Here is a link to the javascript you could use:
http://www.codeave.com/javascript/code.asp?u_log=7065

Card Image Number and Issuer Id Number

Hi
I want to get card image number and issuer id number of jcop card, I have tried GP command as below but getting error. Any help
cm> /send 80CA0042
=> 80 CA 00 42 ...B
(9096 usec)
<= 6A 88 j.
Status: Reference data not found

hi Thanks for replying,
Command you guys have suggested gives information as below, but it still does not gives issuer identification number and card image number. (unique to chip)
IC Fabricator : 4070
IC Type : 5072
Operating System ID : 4051
Operating System release date : 4204 (22.7.2004)
Operating System release level : 2200
IC Fabrication Date : 5049 (18.2.2005)
IC Serial Number : 00606190
IC Batch Identifier : 7113
IC Module Fabricator : 4070
IC Module Packaging Date : 0000
ICC Manufacturer : 0000
IC Embedding Date : 0000
IC Pre-Personalizer : 0317
IC Pre-Perso. Equipment Date : 1430
IC Pre-Perso. Equipment ID : 36303631
IC Personalizer : 0000
IC Personalization Date : 0000
IC Perso. Equipment ID : 00000000

Image rotationY, scaling issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for