Image Size/Resolution for ProShow Producer ?

Need to prepare images for a slideshow I am creating in ProShow Producer.  Not understanding their suggestion to convert my images to jpeg 1.5.
The projector is 1920 X 1080 and will be shown on a 26' wide screen at a movie theater.
I correct the RAW image and then Save As tif (dimensions are 5184 X 3456 at 300 ppi).
Usually I resize the tif at this point and Save As jpg.  When I resize I have always put in the dimensions 1920 width for landscape images and resolution 300 ppi.   
Would you just change the pixel Dimensions and leave the Document size alone?
They want me to Save As jpeg 1.5 and I don't understand what they are asking me to do or how to do it.
Can anyone explain this to me?

try google. It appears to be a webcam format.

Similar Messages

  • How to make Image/size/resolution agree with metadata resolution?

    After scanning the help file a bit and searching thru this forum a bit with `metadata resolution' as search criteria, I'm still pretty confused about how it is supposed to work.. I may have never actually found the right part of the help file.
    Cutting to the chase: How can I make the resolution reported by the metadata tab for resolution agree with what is reported inside photoshop at Image/size resolution.  I didn't see any way to set how res is reported in bridge.
    I see many pictures reported in metadata as 72 ppi for resolution and  reported in photoshop as 200 pixel/inch
    They do BOTH mean pixels per inch right?  If so, or really even if they don't how can I get the two reports to show the same resolution?
    There are too many processes that depend on knowing res in advance of opening a file for that to be so far divergent.

    Jingshu Li wrote:
    Some JPG or Tiff with Camera raw settings will be opened in ACR firstly when you double click them. In ACR workflow option (the bottom in the ACR dialog) the resolution value isn’t same with that in Bridge (metadata panel). If you go ahead to open the image in PS by clicking ‘Open Image’ button in ACR dialog and then check the image size from Image -> Image Size in PS, the resolution will be same with ACR (actually it is changed by ACR).
    If disable ACR support for JPG and Tiff in Bridge (Open Camera Raw Preferences in Bridge and choose ‘Disable JPEG support’ or ‘Disable TIFF support’ for ‘JPEG and TIFF Handling’), JPG or TIFF files will be opened by PS directly and the resolution matches between Bridge and PS. I believe this is an ACR bug.
    So what file types are you using and if they’re opened by ACR firstly in your workflow?
    The files are *.jpg.   But I don't see where camera raw comes in.  These are common jpg files.  I'm opening them by double click in bridge.
    Any way I did disable jpg and tiff in the Camera Raw preferences as you suggested.  At Jpeg and tiff handling, both disabled. and restared bridge.
    However, I see no improvment.
    For example, a file reporting 72 ppi in bridge when opened in photoshop ... Images/size resolution reports 480 pixels/inch.
    There is obviously some kind of miss handling that has been done to these files for them to have such a high resolution.   I suspect they may have been handled at Walgreens or Walmart... or similar since I had something very similar happen to me once when I had a bunch of pictures developed at Walgreens and they cam back with resolutions like that, when I know the camera would have given them something way less.
    But I don't see how any of that should be effecting Bridges  inability to get the resolution right.
    Here is another example: some.jpg
    It appears that bridge is showing an unusually huge file size in inches, to account for the reported 72 ppi.
    Bridge:
    Size: ...............1.14mb
    Dimensions:.....1496x1064
    Dimensions in
    inches ............20.8x26.7
    Resolution: .....72 ppi
    ===========================
    Photoshop:
    pixels
    Width 1496
    height 2064
    Document size
    inches
    width  4.987
    height 6.88
    Resolution 300
    Do you have further suggestions?

  • Photoshop CC crop image size & resolution dialog box

    In previous versions of Photoshop the "R" button displays the Crop Image Size & Resolution dialog box.  Is this feature completely gone is CC? I can't find anything the even references this dialog box.  Anyone out there have this issue?

    In photoshop cc 2014, the size and resolution boxes will actually show on the tool options bar instead of a separate dialog window, by choosing W x H x Resolution from the drop-down menu.
    http://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/using/crop-straighten-photos.html

  • Relation between image size, resolution and pixels

    I would like to increase the size of image by using PSE9.
    For sample existing image had: width (W) 6.073", height (H) 7.683", resolution 300, pixels W 1822, H 2305.
    A situation) when I changed the image to W 8, H10 and click on RESAMPLE the resolution on changed but number of pixels increase to W 2400  and
       H 3036
    B situation) Image size W 8, H 10 and NO ACTIVATED RESAMPLE. Now resolution reduced to 227 and number of pixel NO CHANGED from original
       W 1822, H 2305
    In my understanding if image blow up the number of pixels will be same as original and only the distance between pixels will be increase. So, resolution should
    be dropped.
    Now the question: How in sample A increase number of pixels? From where they come?
    More realistic looks sample B.
    Now other way: I used crop - make original image smaller. So, the number of pixels should degrees and resolution NO CHANGED. But PSE 9 shown number of pixels same and resolution increased.
    Is it right?
    What is wrong or right in above explanation?
    Can visible find the difference between samples A & B on computers monitor? I tried blow up sample B by 10 times and still no differences on screen,It is because resolution of monitor to low?

    A. Resample means elements adds pixels to the existng pixels to increase image size
        and\or resolution and subtracts pixels to downsize. Usually resampling to make an image
        smaller is okay, but resampling to make an image bigger can result in loss of quality.
        Of course that doesn't mean you shouldn't do it, just something to keep in mind.
    B. Leaving the resample box unchecked, elements only changes resolution (print size)
        and doesn't change the actual number of pixels (harm the image) so the image will
        be and look the same on your monitor.
    Usually a resampled image will be of lower quality than a non resampled image because
    elements has to make pixels to upsize and subtract pixels to downsize.
    Elements uses the resampling method choosen in the image size dialog to determine how,
    with one of the bicubic choices being the best for photos.
    Elements, as far as i know, uses the standard bicubic mehod for the resampling with the crop tool.
    A more detailed explanation:
    http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/331/331327.html
    MTSTUNER

  • Image size & resolution

    Why is that when I change the resolution under image/image size the width and height change?

    Thank you so much, resample image was unchecked. I've never had that problem before, so I thought I might have clicked on something.

  • Image size makes for slow viewing

    Does iweb reduce the photos inserted from iphoto? Even though I have a broadband connection, when visiting my own site, the page with the thumbnails loads very slowly.
    Do I need to resize them first in a separate album in iphoto?
    I wish there was an option to set the image size, like you do when exporting from iphoto to email, or web, etc.
    thanks.

    This issue has been widely discussed in this forum. iWeb uses the PNG format for all but a few images. PNG is an uncompressed format, so that an image that would be, say, 30 KB as a JPEG can be 150 KB or more as a PNG. This is a huge problem and has caused my wife and I to totally drop iWeb because most people viewing our family web site have only dialup connections (rural area). I've read that 60% of the US are still on dialup, though others on this forum have disputed that figure, saying it is more like 40%. Even so, do you REALLY want 40% of your site visitors hitting the back button because it takes too long for your page to load. A simple home page that we created took 5 - 8 minutes to load on dialup.
    Please, please leave Feedback here. Apple promises to read all user feedback and take it into consideration for future updates to the program.

  • What is the best image size format for imovie iOS

    I want to create a few black images with white letters as title slides and use them with some of my videos I am creating using imovie with my new ipad3.
    What is the best image size?
    thanks!
    Jeremy

    It all depends on what you want to do with the images.
    If you don't want to do any moves on the images then make them the exact size of the video.
    The iPad 3 edits in full HD, 1920 x 1080.
    If you want to do small moves, then make is larger.
    But keep the 1920 x 1080 dimensions otherwise iMovie just chops the image to that ratio.
    good luck

  • Image size/resolution question

    I’m starting to get to know Keynote (3.0.2) for the first time.
    My Document Slide Size is set to 1024x768. I’m building slides by dragging and dropping up to four jpegs on to one slide.
    Q1: Is a resolution of 72dpi sufficient for these images? I’m utilizing original images at anything from 72dpi to 300dpi – if I downsize them all to 72dpi before dropping them in is that OK?
    Q2: Is it OK, when an image is to be used on a slide at 500px375px for the original image to be that size? Or is advisable to use Keynote to resize down from a larger image?
    I’m just looking for the best quality on the screen.
    Lots of good advice on this forum.
    Thank you, in advance, for any help.

    Basically, don't worry about dpi (dots per inch), only worry about dots. That is, your 500x375 pixel image has a certain number of dots per side, but its dpi could be almost anything, but the dpi is irrelevant for Keynote. (A 500x375 image at 300dpi is exactly the same file size as 500x375 at 72dpi - the total number of pixels in the image is exactly the same, all that's changed is how it translates into inch dimensions - the 300dpi one will be ~4x smaller in inch dimensions). All that matters is the outer dimension and how that compares to the nominal dimension setting of your presentation.
    Larger images take up more memory and make the file bigger. Having files significantly larger than the size you plan to project at (usually 1024x768) doesn't help much in terms of visuals. Keynote does a good job of scaling images up and down if the display device output is different than the nominal size of the presentation. Keynote is much faster at dealing with large images that PPT is on a Mac, so the penalty is not there if you use large images.
    As a general rule, unless I'm really trying to minimize file size or the image is gigantic in kb, I don't bother with resizing ahead of time, it's just not worth the hassle to me. I try not to drop in multiple mb jpegs, for example, but anything around an mb or less is not worth downrezzing. My company regularly produces 30-50mb decks, so we're just used to it.
    Uprezzing small files significantly should be avoided, as it obviously leads to pixelation and artefacts that are distracting. Having said that, Keynote does as good a job as you can expect in this area.
    Unless I'm missing something (I'm not a Keynote power user), Keynote lacks the file compression tools of Powerpoint (esp on PC, which allows images to be down-rezzed and cropped portions of images to be discarded, which has dramatic effect on reducing file size). So if you need to keep Keynote file size small, you need to do the legwork to reduce the image file (as opposed to just dpi) sizes before importing them.
    HTH
    Adam

  • Screen size/resolution for iPad 3

    Hi
    I'm designing a portfolio app. At the moment I am previewing it on an iPad 2 in content viewer and all looks OK (text a but fuzzy but I hear thats normal) However I have set the articles and folio builder up in iPad 3 sizings as we will shortly be getting an Ipad 3 and will be showing off our work (we're a design agency) on the new higher res iPad 3. So, is it best practice for me to work to 2048x1536 @ 264 ppi for the iPad 3 versions, then when I've designed and built my app, downsize to 1024 x 768 at 131ppi?
    Thanks in advance
    Steve Chapman

    Hi Bob/Anyone – I found this post whilst doing some research – what are your opinions of it guys?
    If my maths are correct then, for the iPad 3, keeping the document at 1024×768 pixels but just doubling the res (72ppi to 144ppi) is exactly the same as doubling the doc size to 2048×1536 but keeping it at 72ppi!!
    Michael Buelens
    September 10th, 2012 • 4:45 am • Link
    There seems to be a lot of confusion about the whole retina story amongst print designers.
    It is actually quite simple folks.
    When you design something for iPad 1 or 2 use a 1024×768 pixels document at 72 ppi.
    When designing for the retina ipad make a document 2048×1536 pixels at 72 ppi.
    If you don’t believe me I’ll do the math for you: 2048 pixels wide on a 7.75 inch wide display > 2048 / 7.78 = 264. And 264 just happens to be the advertised resolution of the Retina iPad.
    If you want to let users zoom in on images without the images becoming pixelated, use higher resolution images.
    Use Indesign to layout the documents and create the PDF not Photoshop as mentioned before. Photoshop will produce rasterized text while a PDF from Indesign will offer crisp text at any zoom level.

  • Photoshop, large graphic, stock image, size, resolution

    Hi.
    I am going to make a large graphic about 10 feet x 9 feet using 150 resolution. I have this image in 300ppi that is roughly 12x8 inches. Can this image cover the background of the large graphic without looking too fuzzy?
    Thank you.

    depends on how back you stand. .. :)...400m might be OK
    To resize to 9x10ft from a 12x8ins image will yield poor results.
    But try it and see for yourself. You can get fractal software that'll help, a bit....or you can import it to a vector program and convert it to a vector then you can scale as much as you like...but you will still lose quality during the conversion.

  • Decreasing image size/resolution but then goes back to old size when click ok

    Hi,
    Hope you're well.
    I am working with a photo that I would like to post to a website and want the final size to be 640 x 360 px. The current size is 1024 x 828.
    Is there a way to decrease it to 640 x 360 without cropping it?
    Thanks!

    Changing aspect ratio without visually distorting the subjects unacceptably can often be accomplished through the use of the Content Aware Scaling feature.
    -Noel

  • Feather radius for selection depending on the image size

    Greetings everyone,
    I have a question about setting the feather radius for a selection depending on the image size. I'd like make the edge in the resultant layer mask have roughly the 'same' feather appearance for varying image sizes.
    For files below 2000 pixels I would set  a feather radius of 0.2
    For files above 2000 pixels I would set  a feather radius of 0.3
    However, I started working with 4000-10000 pixel images and I was wondering about the radius for those images.
    Is there a more 'scientific' method I could follow? Any thoughts welcome
    Many thanks
    gr

    You would need to use Photoshop scripting to do that. Also using number of Pixels might not be what you want to use.  While number pixel is an absolute number pixels you have have no size information till there is a DPI resolution involved. At 300 DPI 300 pixels are 1" in size at 72 DPI 300 pixels are 4.16 inches in size.
    A conditional action is not possible adobe conditional action support but is possible with the downloadable script  Siva's Contitional Action

  • Saving Images to DVD for printing

    Hi all
    I have began shooting RAW, converting RAW images and editing with ACR & PSE 4.
    I do not have dedicated printer at this stage as I am still learning editing with PSE4.
    Any images I wish to get printed I save to a DVD and take to local print shop for printing. Normally I save in JPEG format and get 6x4 prints.
    However I have a few images I wish to get printed in a larger size, say 10x8 or 13x11.
    My question relates to what is best format and size to save images to get optium ptinting quality for these siz prints? Pictures taken with a 8mp camera and I have the images saved in TIFF which are 22.9m in size. So resolution is not an issue.
    Hope this makes sense.
    Thanks
    Dennis

    > 8mp camera and I have the images saved in TIFF which are 22.9m in size
    That makes no sense.
    > So resolution is not an issue.
    Yes it is.
    There are 2 issues here: file format and image size/resolution.
    The best format depends upon what the print shop will accept. Often, JPEG is the only option and simply saving at the highest quality will give excellent results. If the option is available from the shop, give them a non-lossy format - TIFF is probably best.
    With image size it's all down to pixels and looking at th epixel size of your image is what matters. The "resolution" [PPI value] is simply the ratio of pixels in the image to inches on paper. So long as you PPI is at least 200 and no more than, say, 600, you are OK. Print shops operate in 2 ways:
    The expensive ones will take your image and you tell them how big you want to print and they do it.
    The cheaper ones require the image be carefully prepared to be the right size - i.e. have the PPI set so that the size in inches is right.
    In my experience, the cheaper ones, while requiring more work, often produce the best results.
    If you are in the UK, email me [colin_walls AT yahoo DOT com] and I will direct you to an excellent mail-order printer, who is cheap, reliable and produces excellent results. [I have no business connection with them, except that I'm a happy customer.]

  • How set image size open raw file?

    How to set image size/resolution when opening a raw file in pse 11 editor??
    win 7 pro; pse 11 settings: edit>preferences>print resolution = 337.596, screen resolution 109 dpi( 27 inch, dell U 2711). Originally print resoltuion was set to 240 dpi  but was changed in case this was causeing a problem. CRAW v 7.4.0.137
    Camera alpha 65, image size is: 6000x3376 dpi; (83.33x46.88 inch)
    Problem is: Currently when I edit a RAW file in CRAW and then open in pse editor image size is: 6000x3376 px; 25x14.667 inches at 240 dpi ( by ration this corresponds to:17.773x10 inch at 337.6 dpi)
    I am trying to change settings so the raw file opens as: 17.776x10 and anywhere from240 to 337.6 dpi
    whatever works or is esiest to set.
    My settings are for use in creating blue ray dvd movies and with cropping and editing printing high quality pictures for family.
    Thanks  in advance for any help you can provide.

    That's a Sony Alpha SLT-A65?
    Are those pixel dimensions of 6000 x 3376 the size the camera raw files came out of the camera?
    You can't really change the resolution that the photoshop elements version of camera raw opens the the files into the pse 11 at.
    (i think 240 is the default for most cameras)
    You can however set the resolution with Image>Resize>Image Size if you need to for printing or other uses.
    In the Image size dialog uncheck Resample Image and enter the resolution.

  • Enhanced Podcast Image Size?

    Hi - I'm wondering if anyone knows what the minimum, maximum, recommended, or optimal image size and resolution are for building enhanced podcasts in Garageband. I have looked through a variety of support options at Apple and I can't find any guidelines about what file types and sizes can be used when adding images to an enhanced podcast, just which sound and video files are supported. The podcasts may be viewed via iTunes or on an iPod, so the viewing size may vary drastically. Any tips would be helpful! Thank you!

    Hi
    Optimal size/resolution for an extended podcast image is 300x300 at 72 dpi. Use .jpg

Maybe you are looking for