Image Size (Scale)

Good evening,
I have been asked to take over a website. Whomever designed
it used an
applet at the bottom of the index.htm that displays a button
that when pressed displays a *.png image in a new browser window.
<APPLET codeBase=./ height=24 width=375
code=fphover.class>
<PARAM NAME="effect" VALUE="bevelIn">
<PARAM NAME="color" VALUE="#669999">
<PARAM NAME="hovercolor" VALUE="#FFBEBE">
<PARAM NAME="textcolor" VALUE="#FFFFFF">
<PARAM NAME="url" VALUE="calendriers/calendrier2.png">
<PARAM NAME="text" VALUE="Cliquez ici pour voir le
calendrier des activités">
</APPLET>
My problem/question is the fact that when the image
'calendrier2.png' is
loaded IE/firefox... redimensions it to make it fit the
entire image within the active
window. I do not want this. Is there a way to leave it
display at it's full
dim? Yes, I realize that if you leave your cursor on the
image an icon
appears allowing one to expand the image. however, the users
of the website
have limited to no abilities and even this step is too
complexe, hence the
reason I was asked to resolve the matter. Basically I need
the image to be
displayed as if every user expanded the image to it's
fullest.
Thank you,
Knowledge Sponge

Must you use this? Java applets will only be seen by a small
fraction of
the general viewing public.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"Knowledge Sponge" <[email protected]> wrote
in message
news:edl0rn$63b$[email protected]..
> Good evening,
>
> I have been asked to take over a website. Whomever
designed it used an
> applet at the bottom of the index.htm that displays a
button that when
> pressed
> displays a *.png image in a new browser window.
>
> ***
> <APPLET codeBase=./ height=24 width=375
code=fphover.class>
> <PARAM NAME="effect" VALUE="bevelIn">
> <PARAM NAME="color" VALUE="#669999">
> <PARAM NAME="hovercolor" VALUE="#FFBEBE">
> <PARAM NAME="textcolor" VALUE="#FFFFFF">
> <PARAM NAME="url"
VALUE="calendriers/calendrier2.png">
> <PARAM NAME="text" VALUE="Cliquez ici pour voir le
calendrier des
> activit?s">
> </APPLET>
> ***
>
> My problem/question is the fact that when the image
'calendrier2.png' is
> loaded IE/firefox... redimensions it to make it fit the
entire image
> within
> the active
> window. I do not want this. Is there a way to leave it
display at it's
> full
> dim? Yes, I realize that if you leave your cursor on the
image an icon
> appears allowing one to expand the image. however, the
users of the
> website
> have limited to no abilities and even this step is too
complexe, hence the
> reason I was asked to resolve the matter. Basically I
need the image to be
> displayed as if every user expanded the image to it's
fullest.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Knowledge Sponge
>

Similar Messages

Scale a layer so it matches the image size. (Automate)

I need to scale a layer so it matches the image size.
The problem is that i need to automate this procedure and apply on a range of images all with different resolutions. (This is why i can't use CTRL+T and just drag the corners of the layer so it fits the image)
The layer that i need to resize is 2000x1500 pixels.
The images that i need the layer to match varies between 3000x2000 pixels and 5000x4000 pixels. (I know all about quality loss when i scale UP so please don't give me a lecture this).
It doesn't matter if the layer proportions changes.
I use Photoshop CS5.

jojonsson wrote:
I need to scale a layer so it matches the image size.
The problem is that i need to automate this procedure and apply on a range of images all with different resolutions. (This is why i can't use CTRL+T and just drag the corners of the layer so it fits the image)
The layer that i need to resize is 2000x1500 pixels.
The images that i need the layer to match varies between 3000x2000 pixels and 5000x4000 pixels. (I know all about quality loss when i scale UP so please don't give me a lecture this).
It doesn't matter if the layer proportions changes.
I use Photoshop CS5.
You state layer but do not state much more. Do you know how many layers these files will have. Will it always be the same layer in the layer stack that needs to be transformed. You state that it doesn't matter if the layer proportions changes by that do you mean you don't care if the layers aspect ration changes and its content becomes very distorted. Layer also supports transparency they need not be a rectangle transforming these layers will not fill in the transparent area or make the rectangular.
You may be able to automate this with a script. Install the ScriptListener and perform the transformation you want to do is steps. Use Ctrl-T set the anchor point to the top left corner and move the layers top left corner to the canvas's top left corner by entering 0 in the x and y fields . Then do a Menu Image size just to get the width and hight of the canvas in pixels and to make sure that the transform is written to Photoshop's script files. Then do a Ctrl-T again with the anchor point top left set the w and h fields to the width and height pixel sizes of the canvas. Also record these steps i an action so you can see how Photoshop does the transforms. You will see Photoshop records the steps and the value he used for the move to Top Left corner were calculated from the Layer original location. You would need to make this same calculation in the script. Un install the plug-in and extract the transforms steps from the Photoshop script files you may now have the information you need to do the transforms you will still have to learn Photoshop scripting to learn how to get document canvas sizes and layer sizes and process the layers. Not an easy task.....

Why is there a scroll bar though I set the background image to "scale to page size"?"

Why is there a scroll bar though I set the background image to "scale to page size"?"

The current build of iTunes may occasionally draw the scroll bar off the edge of the screen. It should be possible to resize the window to reveal the scroll bar.
You can restore much of the look & feel of the previous version with these shortcuts:
Ctrl-B to turn on the menu bar.
Ctrl-S to turn on the sidebar.
Ctrl-/ to turn on the status bar.
Click the magnifying glass top right and untick Search Entire Library to restore the previous search behaviour.
You can also open the menu bar temporarily by pressing Alt.
tt2

Save Image size setting in Save for Web

I'm using Save for Web (CS3) and scaling the file to different sizes with "scale image". I'm wanting to use the same scale settings for many images but when I save the pre-set the image size settings don't get saved. I'm wanting to use it as part of an action but the setting wont stick. Any suggestions? Alternative work flows?

That's never been saved as part of the S4W presets. Bloody annoying.

Since downloading the 2013 Keynote upgrade, the slide image size on handouts with 3 slides per page option is very small. Is there a way to make the slide size larger while still keeping 3 slides per page lines?

With the new Keynote upgrade (version 6.1), the slide image size on handouts is very small, which makes it difficult to read slide content when compiling lecture notes for students. Is there a way to make the slide size larger while still keeping to a format of 3 slides per page with lines?

A number of posts have reported the same issue, two workarounds:
1
check the paper handling options or equivalent in your print dialogue box and set to scale to fit
2
in the Keynote option, in the dropdown menu in the Print section, select Individual Slides
then choose Layout, and set the number of pages, when printed you will have multiple pages on a single sheet.

How can you find out an individual image size from multiple images on a canvas

This is probably a really really simple question but I can't for the life of me find how I can find out an individual image size from multiple images on a canvas. eg I have 3 photos i want to arrange 1 large and the other two next to it half the size. How can I edit individual image size on the canvas as when I select the image on a sperate layer I want to resize it just resizes the entire canvas and not the individual image
Thanks

I want to know they exact dimensions though. You can get them by dragging to the 0,0 corner and then reading off of the ruler scale on the sides but its fiddily as you have to zoom right in and work it out. I know in photoshop there is a ruler but is there any other way in Elements?

Problems with image sizes

There seems to be lots of confusion about image sizes and Apple iBookstore Support et al simply state that images should not be greater than 2 megapixels.
IBook Author Help > Photos and other images, states:-
Important: When you export your book for distribution outside the iBookstore, images are automatically scaled to a width of 2048 pixels, which is optimized for iPad with Retina display. Readers can view these images on other iPad models, but the viewing experience might be slower. You can improve the viewing experience on iPad models without Retina display by using images no wider than 1024 pixels.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5117 states:-
Publishing to the iBookstore:
If most of your readers will be using the original iPad, scale down images in Interactive Image widgets to a width of 2048 pixels and all other images to a width of 1024 pixels.
Previewing on iPad, or exporting for distribution outside the iBookstore:
You can improve the viewing experience on iPad models without Retina display by scaling down images in Interactive Image widgets to a width of 2048 pixels and all other images to a width of 1024 pixels.iBA help deals with exporting books OUTSIDE the store and simply advises that you can help none Retina viewers by having a smaller image. No help at all really - but suggests that the use of images 2048 is OK. that would indicate 2048 x 1536 or 1496. No mention of what resolution should be used.
iBookstore support basically reapeat this.
So to ease life in getting books accepted, should we all use 1024 x 768 @72ppi for iPad & iPad 2 and now iPad mini. ????
and use 2048 x 1536 @ ?? for The New iPad Retina display!
Both fail to mention HOW the books author would know which iPad a buyer/viewer will be using. Also if "we" only use 1024 x 768, those with Retina do not get an "enhanced viewing experience".
For a company that deals entirely with devices that use logical programming - there seems very little logic applied when it comes to dealing with a section of their business which by issueing iBA Free and wacking 30% of the top, must be adding to the $billions already stacked away in a corner somewhere.
iBA makes eBooks for use/display on iPads only. For months now since iBA became available, one of the most common requests on this forum is help with....image sizes.
It seems reasonable now when Retina is in use and eventually the iPad and iPad 2 will fade away - ditto the new none retina mini and ALL Apple devices and computers will be retina. So why not plan now! Surely images in shoudl be geared to deal with Retina displays. IF Apple would take that line maybe "Support" would have less work dealing with requests for help about images IF Apple accept that the next Stephen King may not have a clue how to deal with adjusting images sizes and simply state the required dimentions.
I make photo books and use 2048 x 1496 @150ppi - so far ten free books have gone into the store.
The suggestion about images for retina display as "standard" as been sent as feedback.

For all those who are still confused by Apples image restrictions / requirements...
In the new Template chooser after the recent updates is "Antique". This template has a Chapter background image ( the olde world print of sailing ships in blue litho print style ). This print when opened in PS is 2771 x 1506 @72ppi. 2771x1506=4,173,126 pixels.This implies Apple supply a book which does not comply with its own requirements!
Higher image resolution applied to printed photo inmages, make the image sharper. If for example you wanted to print a wall poster 45inches wide, the image needs needs a higher resolution to cater for the size, BUT the same image used for a 45" poster will print 4.5" wide print on your own printer!
iBA full page is deemed to be 1024 x 748. resolution from Apple is 72ppi. An image with those specifications will be OK in iPad & iPad 2 - but not so sharp on a Retina display especially if zoomed larger on screen
Now it seems 2048 x 1496 - double the original image size is suggested for Retina.
You can change an image in PS i.e. 1024 x 748 and change resolution to 144. PS will double the pixel size as you change the resolution. OK, just change pixel sizes back to 1024 x 748 and reolution is now 144.
That indicates a sharper image which will be suitable for retina display and in fact all current iPad models.
Today my 11th photo book was notified as available in the iBook Store, all my images were pre-formatted at 2048 x 1496 @ 150ppi. ( 2048 x 1496 = 3.063,808 pixels!)
During delivery there were no issues flagged and after delivery no tickets.
So I suggest all those folk pondering images sizes follow my example, which is now proved to be accepatble!
One thing puzzles me though, I dont use all images as full page and they can be masked down to - say - 250 x 200. Should just make an image to fit the size I want to display ??

Photoshop CC 2014 Screws Up Image Size

Every time I open a document in Photoshop CC 2014, the size of the canvas is basically half its real image size. I took a video of my screen so that you can understand what is happening to me and hopefully figure out what I'm doing wrong.
I make an image that is 800x300 pixels at 72 ppi
The image opens up looking half the size (about 400x150 pixels).
I make a text box with a font at 12 pt, and it comes out tiny.
I enlarge the font, type "Testing 1 2 3," and then export the image as a PNG file.
The PNG file comes out as 800x300 pixels, but the text is pixelated.
What in the world am I doing wrong? Never, in all my years of using Photoshop, had I encountered such a problem before now.
Notice at the bottom of the screen that the canvas is at 100% the entire time.

You post so little useful information. You video show you using a mac the the video setting look like 1080 yet the video does no fill my 1920 width but does fill the 1080 height. Your Mac launch icon look huge so you your 800x300 canvas looks small on you desktop so I'm guessing retina display with lots of pixels 4:3 aspect ratio. The ping posted here look bad because of the way this site scale images. if you open it in a new tab it looks great even when I click on it thus site html pop-up image display of the png looks good. I see no pixelation and the edges look sharp ans smooth.

Aperture/Photoshop plug in and image size

I'm having a problem I don't really understand. I have Aperture 3 and I have CS5 that I'm trying to use as a plug-in for Aperture. This is half an Aperture question and half a Photoshop one so I hope someone can answer it for me.
In Photoshop I made an "action" that is a sort of raised beveled watermark for my photos.
I open one of my images in Aperture and "fix" it - soften the skin, blur the background (whatever...) then I go to the top menu item "Photos" and go down and pick "edit with Adobe CS5." And my image opens in Photoshop. I go to the menu and pick the watermark action but when it works my watermark can't really be "read" because it's not fitting on the photo, it's too big and falls off the edges. The photo is 1241x1280 px.
But here is the odd thing. If I take that same photo, the very same size 1241x1280 and open it directly in photoshop, completely bypass Aperture, and run the watermark action, it's actually a bit small (but usable) it fits fine in the very same photo! When I check the image size in Photoshop it is the same size (regardless of if I open in photoshop directly or go there from Aperture).
So this problem only seems to happen when I edit the photo from Aperture. I'm new to both Aperture and Photoshop (crazy to try and learn 2 programs at once) and I don't know if I can make just the watermark layer in photoshop smaller. But again it fits fine if I apply it directly from Photoshop bypassing Aperture.
Does anyone know why this happens and how I can make the watermark work? Or can I make a watermark in Aperture?
Thanks for any help,
Susan

susan-kelly wrote:
Like I said when I rescale it they way you said to do in photoshop it changes the size and distorts it a bit.
If you hold down the 'Shift + Option' keys while scaling, the text, shape or raster object will not distort and will resize from the center (AKA - maintain aspect ratio).
I run the full version of PS, so am not sure if the commands are exactly the same if you are running PS Elements, but there is a command at 'Layer menu > Layer Style > Scale Effects..' which can be used for scaling the bevel settings to match the scaling of the watermark item.
One exact way to do this in PS full version is to choose the Edit > Transform > Scale command and then use the option bar fields under the main menu bar to change the 'H' (Height) and 'W' (Width) percentages equally (to say 70% in each) and then use the aforementioned 'Layer........Scale Effects' command and enter 70% in that dialog. This should reduce the watermark and effects appropriately without distortion.
Note - indeed both programs are very deep (especially PS), but that just gives you more fun to learn as you go. Don't worry about mastering either, just work within a structured workflow so you can take the steps at your own pace.
Again, I am not sure what version of PS you are running, but the one book I suggest looking into more than any other is at the link below. It is somewhat dated, but the information is completely relevant and covers the general usage of Photoshop to make anyone comfortable with the tool set.
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Photoshop-Unmasked-Science-Selections/dp/0321441206/ ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1307824869&sr=8-1
The companion website is still up and you can download all the images used in the book if you want to practice on the same images he outlines. Well worth a look if you want to learn Photoshop.

How do I change the JPEG image size in PSE-12 when opening from RAW

Switching from PSE-9 to PSE-12. When a JPEG image is opened RAW in PSE-12 the size is 18.72" Wide x 12.48" high 300 DPI. The same image in PSE-9 is 23.4" wide x 15.6" High 240 DPI. How do I get PSE-12 to open the image as in PSE-9?

Uncheck the boxes at the bottom of the dialog Scale styles and resample Image so that only constrain proportions is checked. If you the change the resolution box from 240 to 300 you will get back to your original dimensions.
This is a meaningless thing to do, you still have the exact same number of pixels, you have only changed the metadata number in the file for ppi, and your prints are not affected by this number.
You could also use the same method to change the dimensions to 6 x 4 or 9 x 6 etc.
There are some cases (actually most cases) where you need to CROP the photo to change the dimensions, when the aspect ratio of the original photos is different than the aspect ratio of the final photo; the specific case in 99jon's example is the only case you ever want to change dimensions using Image->Resize->Image Size, where the aspect ratio doesn't change from 6x4 to 9x6 (or 12x8 or 18x12 or ...), and even then, you could do the same thing simply by telling the printer the size you want, you don't really need to do anything in PSE.

Image size change when save as jpeg

Hi
I have recently encountered an issue when I save file as jpeg in CS6. I prepared my image for printing and my image is a bit smaller than the print size (20" x 40") so I created a new file (8 bit) with new exact print size. Then I placed my image into this newly created layer and adjust my image size to fit. After this, I flatterned the image and went to file>save as and picked JPG extension. Dialogue box appeared and I selected 10 for quality (scale 1-12) then I hit ok to save. After that I went to open the newly saved JPG file and check the file size and for somereasons, It has been halved to around 10"x20". However, pixle dimension of the image remained unchange because I have unticked resample option. Does anyone have any ideas of why this is the case as It's doing my head in.
Thanks
Dean

This has been discussed ad nauseam here. Please do a forum search. < sigh >
Bottom line: If the pixel count remains the same, your image has not been "reduced or halved" at all. Just change the ppi resolution accordingly without resampling.
Save for Web defaults to 72 ppi regardless of what you had specified earlier,´.

Photo Gallery Module - Customize large image size

I need to figure out how to customize the size of the full image on the Photo Gallery Module. I have a couple of clients using this module that do not understand how to crop and resize images before uploading them.
I understand this can be done through CSS, but the issue I foresee is that the original image is still used which could have a large file size. Is there a workaround for resizing the full size image and also reducing the actual file size? Either through CSS, JS, or maybe even the new BC Liquid engine? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

You can go to the file manager and use the resize option on images in there.
BUT
They need to do this outside of such systems, BC will only edit based on numbers and math, if the client gets the wrong proportional values it will screw up the images, the system will not crop the images, only scale them so things can turn out squashed etc.
If images are being used on the web as an indicative representation of something for a site, they need to be done properly and out of the system before they come in.

How to resize layer in percentage relative to image size?

Hi,
Say I have an image that is 100x100 pixles. And I want to take one of the layers and resize it to 50% of the image size, so that it is 50 pixles. How can I accomplish that?
The reason I ask, is that have multiple images all with different size. But I have a signature (ie. watermark) that is always the same size. I want to be able to place this signature, and then resize it to XX% of the image it was placed on. That way, it should always have the same proportions.
Thanks in advance!

You can scale by percentage of the original layer size going to Edit > Transform > Scale. In the transform options menu, there is an option to scale by percentage - just make sure that you click on the link icon between the Height and Width fields to maintain the aspect ratio of your layer.
However, if you wanted to scale a layer relative to the canvas size, I think you would need to do some scripting or use actions... you might want to ask around on the Photoshop General Discussion or Photoshop Scripting forums to see if anyone has a solution.
Kendall
(Edited - misinterpreted original question)

PS CC Image Size Looks Different

This may be in here somewhere, but I didn't see it....
I very recently switched from CS6 to CC.
I edited an image, made a selection, blurred the selection, did my normal processing, then sent it back to LR5.
In LR5 I cropped and exported to 1280 px on the longest side. Image looked as edited...
Later I got to thinking about sharpening and decided to try cropping and resizing in CC so I could sharpen just the areas that were sharp.
Cropped the image as desired, then did image/image size and cropped to 1280 px. The area I blurred is DRASTICALLY different - much blurrier.
Went back in history and did a stamp visible, then repeated the crop and resize. Image now looks as it should.
Tried it with the "scale styles" turned ON and OFF. No difference. In theory I've inserted both images.....
This appears to be very different behavior than I've seen in previous versions. What do I have set wrong?

Hi Noel,
I opened the image from LR5 as a standard image.
On the original layer, I did the selection of the background. Feathered it 1 px.
With the selection on, I duplicated it, which gave me a layer that only contained the background. This way, when it's blurred, it can't blur pixels where the sharp areas are.
I converted the new layer to a smart object.
I then did a filter/blur/gaussian blur of 4 px so I'd have a smart filter. Looked, fiddled, adjusted the filter eventually to 6 px.
From that point I did my normal
clone/heal on a layer
dodging on a 50% gray overlay layer
burning on a 50% gray overlay layer
Adjust contrast/brightness/whatever on a curves layer
Adjust saturation on a hue/sat layer
save the psd...
Crop using the crop tool - no set size, just removing excess stuff
Do image/image size to resize to 1280 px -- this is the point where the background blur changes
IF, on the other hand, prior to cropping, I do a merge visible (with alt down - stamp visible?), I can then crop and resize and the background doesn't change...
I presume I"m doing something wrong in the image size dialog, but I don't see it. I've tried it with the scale styles on and off - no difference...
If there's any other info you need, let me know.

How to reduce image size while maintaining proportions?

Thank you in advance for reading this.
I was given an image with these dimensions: w: 13.89 x h: 5.56 inches
I'm being asked to make it fit these dimensions: w: 8.5 x h: 5.47 inches
I cannot figure out how to achieve this without the picture looking stretched, in terms of it's height. Everything looks constrained when you just do the image or canvas resize...any help/advice is greatly appreciated!

Because the Aspect Ratios are different you will need to crop it and you will lose quite a bit of the image. You can first scale the image to have a height of 5.47" using menu Image>Image Size. In the Image size dialog un-check Resample and set the print height to 5.47" click OK this will set the Image's DPI resolution to print the image 5.47" high. Next set the Rectangle marquee tool to use mode fixed size set the width to 8.5" and the height to 5.47" then click on the top left corner of the image. You will see a selection the size you want. Use the arrow keys to move the selection for the best composition then use menu Image>Crop. You will be losing over 4" of the images width....

Image Size (Scale)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for