Images too low-rez

When I place an image in the CS4 version it's fine but the same image in CS6 is low-rez. What gives?

The layout file, minus photo, was created in CS4. After opening it in CS6 I then placed a photo and got the jaggies. Did not move the photo after placing it. My guess is that CS6, being a new installation, was settling in. (That's a technical term.) In any event it's working smoothly now, no need for an extra linking step with other photos that I'm placing.
Thanks for your help, Peter.

Similar Messages

Images very low rez

I did a small test slide show in iPhoto of images from Aperture and they look extremely low rez.in the preview. Then I exported to iDVD and they still look low rez. In Aperture there 16bit raw files. How can I be sure they will be of a higher quality?
Thank You

You are probably using the display (Thumbnail) images rather than the original hi res photos - probably the Aperture forum would be a better place to ask about Aperture questions - iPhoto is using what you give it from Aperture - not really an iPhoto question
LN

How do I know if my image resolution is too low now that the yellow triangle warning is gone?

I am creating a book in iPhoto 11 for the first time. In older versions, I would get a yellow triangle indicating my image quality was too low for that size image. Based on other threads, it looks like iPhoto no longer gives the warning. What is the best way to know if the image will print okay? Is there a workaround so I can check the quality of the image prior to printing out the book?

I noticed that there's not resolution waring also. Create a PDF file of the book and look at the pages at full sized with Preview and determine if the photos are sharp enough for you.
I ran a test with two images, one 4000 x 3000 pixels and the other 230 x 200 pixels in a 2 photo per page book page and then created a pdf of the book, Modern Lines theme. This is a screenshot of the page in Preview at View ➙ View Full Sized:
This screenshot is of the same photo in a different 2 photo per page layout in the same theme. It does look more like I expected:
Right click on the image and select Show in New Window from the Contextual menu. I'm really surprised the first example of the small image looked as good as it did. I expected a very pixelated image like the second example but iPhoto upsized it rather nicely. So iPhoto can upsize a small photo to some degree but I don't recommend relying on it for such small images. And it is a very, very, very small image. Soif your image is reasonably large you should be OK. But check it in the PDF file.
OT

Image sits too low on screen in Photoshop CC when I want to start working.

When I have the image set to 'fit screen' it sits too low in the working space. Something has changed and I can't get it back. I have tried to restore settings but no effect. Any suggestions welcome?

My screen looks like this. Note how the image that has been opened sits rather low in the working space. In fact, a little bit of the bottom of the image has been clipped off despite going to the magnifying class and clicking 'Fit Screen'
It is intensely irritating and never used to be like this. I am using the latest CC update and have Mavericks. It appears like this when I double click the image in Bridge to open in Adobe CC. I can find no way to drag the image up a bit or reset anything.

Keynote Send to iPhoto creates images too small for iBooks

I like using iBooks, but the layout flexibility is too constraining for what I do. I like to do my layouts in Keynote (because I get freedom of layout, cool themes, and I can them use the Keynote as a presentation) then I send to iPhoto. In the past, this has worked fine and the resolution has been suitable. Now (perhaps with 08) the resolution is about half what it used to be, too low for a good print job. While images used to be on the order of 1.8MB each, now they are 325k to 500k. I'm sure if I order such an iBook, my client will not be pleased with fuzzy text and photos.
I have tried pdf to iPhoto, same results. I've tried export to desktop, same results. I've selected jpeg (highest quality), same results.

Hi Larry,
Thank you for your reply. I apologize for not adding more details. The photo I originally sent as a "large" file was 414 KB. When I switch to "actual" it is 2.3MB which I am assuming will work for the publication. I am only sending one photo at a time – one for each article. Thank you again. I expect the photo editor will let me know tomorrow if they have what they need. Fingers crossed.
By the way, in addition to iPhoto I also have Lightroom but have not had a chance to learn the basics of using it. As of now my entire library is in iPhoto and Picasa.
Thank you again for your time,
Lynn

OCR won't work because too low dpi, but clearly is very high DPI

Hello,
I am using Adobe Acrobat Pro version 8 on Windows 7 64 bit. I have a document which won't OCR--it comes up with error messages saying the pages are less than 72 dpi. I can't find a way to verify the actual dpi of this file. However, if I zoom in to 6400% on the text, it stays looking very clear and clean--almost as if it were vector text already. I have trouble believing the resolution is really below 72 dpi or too low for OCR to make sense of it.
Any advice?
Thanks,
Dan

Thanks. I wasn't familiar with the pre-flight too. I double clicked on
"list bitmaps below 300 dpi" - result: no problems found
"list images below 100 ppi" - results: no problems found
I can't seem to find any other place to check for resolution. With my limited knowledge both of these results would seem to indicate that I shouldn't be receiving the error--and then of course there is the fact that the text resolution is visually excellent at the highest possible zoom--which makes me think that OCR should be working regardless of what the preflight tool says.
Any further advice would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Dan

Running rman with virtual tape speed too low(500KB/s approx)

Hey guys, I run rman with mhvtl. but the backup speed is too low(500kB/s).
the mhvtl debugging prints indicate that the block size is 64kB and the scsi command is running synchronous.
does any one know how to speed up this backup operation?<smiley image='anim_crazy.gif'/>
Thanks.
<b>my system:</b>
linux kernel 2.6.18
mhvtl 0.18.17
oracle10
obtool 10.2
<b>rman configure:</b>
RMAN> show all;
using target database control file instead of recovery catalog
RMAN configuration parameters are:
CONFIGURE RETENTION POLICY TO REDUNDANCY 1; # default
CONFIGURE BACKUP OPTIMIZATION OFF; # default
CONFIGURE DEFAULT DEVICE TYPE TO 'SBT_TAPE';
CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP OFF; # default
CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP FORMAT FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO '/backup1/ctl_%F';
CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP FORMAT FOR DEVICE TYPE SBT_TAPE TO '%F'; # default
CONFIGURE DEVICE TYPE DISK PARALLELISM 2 BACKUP TYPE TO BACKUPSET;
CONFIGURE DEVICE TYPE 'SBT_TAPE' BACKUP TYPE TO BACKUPSET PARALLELISM 1;
CONFIGURE DATAFILE BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO 1; # default
CONFIGURE DATAFILE BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE SBT_TAPE TO 1; # default
CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO 1; # default
CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE SBT_TAPE TO 1; # default
CONFIGURE CHANNEL 1 DEVICE TYPE DISK FORMAT '/backup1/backup_%U';
CONFIGURE CHANNEL 2 DEVICE TYPE DISK FORMAT '/backup2/backup_%U';
CONFIGURE CHANNEL DEVICE TYPE 'SBT_TAPE' MAXOPENFILES 1 PARMS '';
CONFIGURE MAXSETSIZE TO UNLIMITED; # default
CONFIGURE ENCRYPTION FOR DATABASE OFF; # default
CONFIGURE ENCRYPTION ALGORITHM 'AES128'; # default
CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG DELETION POLICY TO NONE; # default
CONFIGURE SNAPSHOT CONTROLFILE NAME TO '/home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/dbs/snapcf_orcl.f'; # default

skoczo wrote:What services could i disable?
anything you don't need at startup.
If you disable systemd service from startup, you will lose some kind of functionality, and you should try to figure out yourself whether you need that functionality of not.
If you use pulseaudio (I assume you do, since it looks like you're using gnome), you can safely disable alsa-restore.service and alsa-store.service, as pulseaudio will restore audio levels by itself.
I've masked systemd-vconsole-setup.service myself (disabling isn't enought), since I rarely use virtual console on ttys. I don't have correct keymap on ttys but that's not a big deal for me.
I don't think you need all those @backlight services either. I've personally masked all but one on my system.
e4rat will most likely reduce your start up time greatly, although it's a bit of a hassle to set up.
systemd-readahead might also help, but you should test it for yourself.
I'm also thinking you could probably optimize your initramfs a bit, as 11s is quite long for loading kernel. At least make sure you have 'autodetect' hook enabled in mkinitcpio.conf.
Also you can use lz4hc for compressing initramfs (COMPRESSION="lz4" and COMPRESSION_OPTIONS="-9" in mkinitcpio.conf), which should be faster on decompression than other algorithms.
There are some more tips in arch wiki, if you didn't check it out already

Video recording volume too low on BB Z10

The volume on the video recording is too low , also tried to increase the volume from the enhancement option of the video but it did not help much , the voice recording done via reminder is loud and clear , but its only during the video recording the volume is too low , even if recorded in a small closed room,barely can hear my self or anyone else talking .
is it a software issue , My handset is still under warranty , should i return it ?

i think its a general issue with all BB Z10 ST 100-1 , hope we get a reply or some update from Blackberry team
The Z10 is a great device with many new features but its strange that a basic built in video recording can not record the voice clearly , now for any event i have stopped using Z10 for the camera and videos as the voice is not clear and we have no option to reduce the image and video size which makes it impossible to share the even an one minute video from the phone using bbm or whats app due the large size of the file.
i am not comfortable carrying two devices one for phone and one for videos ,
Hope these are all software related issues which would be sorted out in the next update

How to block an order if the price is too low?

Hello,
My problem is :
How to block an order if the price is too low?
I created a new type of condition ZMIN and an access by material.
When the net price is below the minimum price the system must position the order on incomplete document for error of price.
Thank you in advance.
Frédéric Blaise
e-Kenz S.A.

Hello,
you can enter a lower limit in the condition record:
Lower limit of the condition rate/amount
Indicates whether, during document processing, the system checks if manual changes fall short of the lower limit allowed for the corresponding condition record.
Use
When you maintain the scales in a condition record, the system checks whether the scale value falls below the lower limit.
Or you can use the flag 'conditon update'.
Condition update
Controls whether limit values are relevant for pricing.
E.g.: you can make the use of a particular condition record in the document dependent on a specified total value.
This total value can be specified in the condition record.
I hope that the information are helpful.
With best regards
Claudia Neudeck

Price too low - Invoice is not blocked...

Dear,
Probably you all know that invoices can be automatically blocked for payment based on the tolerances set up in customizing. When the price is too high, the system acts like expected, but when the price is too low, we don't get the preferred result. You get a warning message, but no payment block. It would be nice if the invoices with a "price too low" are blocked too.
We don't like to park them, because we work with a scanning procedure, so all invoices have to be posted immediately in the finance department, otherwhise it's very difficult to follow - up...
The purchasing and stock department are solving all the issues (qty and price differences) based on the list in MRBR. If the invoices with incorrect contracts are not in the list, this can give some problems. I've asked the finance people to block the invoices with a lower price manually, but for them this way of working is a little bit annoying...
Does anyone know how to solve this problem? Is there a BADI or user exit (or customizing parameter)?
Thanks in advance!
Kind Regards,
Lien

Please note the following:
The system will check the lower tolerance limit but an invoice will
never be blocked if the LOWER limit is exceeded. The system will only
display a warning message. In the standard system invoices will only be
blocked if the UPPER limit is exceeded because normally one wants to
prevent to pay more than expected.
In SAP Library: MM-Invoice with Variances-Tolerances you will also
find the following explanation:
".. If the variance is outside the tolerance limit, the system displays
this in a warning message. If you do not adjust your entries, you can
still post the invoice. If, however, the upper tolerance limit is
exceeded, the system automatically blocks the invoice for payment."
If this is an issue, message M8084 and M8085 can be customized as
error messages, as a work around. Please transaction OMRM
(spro -> materials management -> logistics invoice verification ->
Define attributes of system messages here you can set message 084 to
error)
You may also want to see the user exit exit_saplkont_002,
enhancement MM08R002 for blocking.
I hope this information will answer your query.

Usb port 1.1 too low

our usb ports are 1.1. too low for ipod shuffle which needs 2.0 if we buy a dock or flexible dock, will both work for converting or will we still be in trouble? operating w/ OS x10.2.8

I'm confused, since Apple claims the shuffle will work on a USB 1.1 port using 10.2.8. (Transfers will obviously be slower.)
If your problem is that the ports accessible to you are low power, for which Apple's recommendation is a different operating system, I'd try a powered hub. The shuffle dock I'm familiar with is really an extension cable with a fancy end on it; to use it you'd want to make sure its male connector was plugged into a port which was providing enough power.
Good luck
srb

Pop up window saying Memory is too low to continue in Logic.Why?Way to Fix?

I recently purchased my IMac OSX 10.6.3 as well as Logic. I have about a half dozen projects on my hard drive now, which is also being backed up to a "time machine" external drive. The projects are pretty small( just piano, or piano and string quartet, etc.) I also just installed Office Suite for Mac and the full Adobe Creative Suite.
Recently when I have been working in the Score Editor(In Logic Pro 9), a pop up window appears saying something to the effect of "memory is getting low, don't install more plugins and remove any unused ones." Then today, after that pop up, another one showed up and said "memory is too low to continue. we will close project, autosave, etc. etc."
Why is this happening? Is there not enough memory on my computer? Will this actually effect editing procedures in Logic? (because it seems like some things aren't working like they used to) Is there a quick and easy fix? Is this related to space remaining on hard drive, or is it completely different? Could it be related to the IMAC backing up files to my "time machine" drive at the same time I am working in LOGIC?
Could someone who has a little time on their hands please answer these questions IN DETAIL? I am new to MAC and LOGIC, so I really have no Idea what's going on with the memory issue. I don't even understand how MEMORY corresponds to available space, quality of running programs, etc.
Please help. I'm working on a deadline to finish a Master's portfolio and this could potentially be a big bump in the road for me.
Thanks....

The System Requirements for Logic Studio call for a minimum or 1 GB RAM with 2 GB recommended. So you should not have a problem with your 4 GB.
First make sure your RAM is being recognized by your computer. Go to Apple Menu (apple in upper left hard corner and click on "About this Mac". Make sure it say 4 GB. Ram chip at times will go bad or become unseated.
Now for troubleshooting, here is what I would do. The next time you want to use Logic, restart your computer. Restarting "flushes" the RAM; it may not sound like it but that is a good thing. Then do not open any other programs other than Logic (except ones you may need for it). You listed an awesome group of software you own. Your computer is not set up for all these programs to automatically start up when you turn on the computer, is it??
So I am betting that you will not get the low memory message when only Logic is working. With some trial and error you will be able to open more and more programs at the same time without effecting Logic.
You can better understand your RAM by opening Activity Monitor (Applications >> Utilities >> Activity Monitor). Click on the System Memory tab at the bottom and you can visualize what your RAM (Memory) is doing. There is also a list of programs that are open and what resources they are sucking up.
Good luck with your computer and your masters.
Arch

Volume too low on ringer and with hands-free headsets

Both the ringer's volume and the volume within headsets are too low in my new Droid X. When holding it to my ear while talking it is loud enough well below max volume, but hearing people through headsets while driving is often too low with all volumes set to max (on loud freeways, for example). I usually keep my phone's ringer on silent vibrate, but it would be nice to be able to turn it up louder when the phone is sitting on a desk at home. Cell phone ringers can be obnoxiously loud, but there are times when people need to have them turned up.
Because it is an issue in both the ringer speaker and the jack for wired headsets, it seems like there is a good chance of getting a software fix to raise the max volume levels. Reading posts on forums, it seems clear that this problem is widespread in most, if not all, Droid X devises.
If you are having similar problems, please take a moment to call both Verizon and Motorola with a polite report of the issue. I spoke with both today and they said they were aware of the issue, and the tech at Motorola said they were "looking into" a software fix for it. If enough people call and report it, we have a better chance of getting a fix sometime soon.
Verizon's support line is: (800) 922-0204.
Motorola's is: (800) 734-5870 (I chose #6 for "other issues" a couple of times after routing into Droid support to get a live tech)
It can be frustrating to filter through the support systems and report it, especially if they tell you to try obvious things like rebooting the phone and turning the volume up, but it really is the only way to get them to fix this issue. Both techs I spoke with actually looked in their systems right away and acknowledged the issue is being reported by people.
Of course, if anyone has a real solution to this issue, please let us know what it is!

Thanks for the suggestion JKramer. I should have been more clear about having adjusted all volumes up in the settings screen. Assuming all sound options are located within the "Settings --> Sound & Display" screen, then yes, I have tried changing them. I have also tried changing the option to "use incoming call volume for notifications" under the "ringer volume" settings, after reading that someone had success in improving volume that way.
This issue is not a problem all of the time. It is only an issue when there is an elevated level of background noise, such as driving on the freeway, or having music or a movie playing in the room.
The phone is otherwise excellent! I live and commute in areas of very spotty reception (with all cell providers), and this phone will keep calls and not even have voices garble where my past two phones have consistently dropped calls in at least five problem locations. So far, everything else about it seems to work great!
Maybe some of these phones don't have this issue. Or, maybe the people who say they don't encounter the problem are lucky enough to live in relatively quite environments most of the time. In a quiet house or office, it is certainly loud enough. It just needs to have the option for increased volume when in noisy places. The issue is that its "max volume" settings are not as loud as with other phones.
Searching for something like "Droid X volume" will indeed show many people experiencing these same problems on various forums...

Images too dark on external display

Hello,
I use Lightroom on my (Lenovo) notebook. Because of the small screen size, I tried using it with an external (Samsung) display. However, when I open Lightroom on the external display, all the images suddenly seem way too dark. It is the case that this display is generally too dark, because when I view the same picture in a photo viewer or a browser it is not too dark. See for example this screenshot. On the left hand you see an image (export from Lightroom) in my browser, on the right hand the same image in Lightroom. You can clearly see it is much darker. When I view both images on the screen of the notebook itself, there is no difference between them.
Actually, when I move the Lightroom window from the notebook display to the external display, you can clearly see Lightroom adjusting the images from light to dark.
Does anyone know what causes this, and how I can prevent Lightroom from showing the images too dark?
Thanks!

I guess you misunderstood my problem. It's not only that images on the external display are way darker than on the notebook, but also that on the external display images in Lightroom are much darker than when I view the same image on the same display in a photo viewer or a browser. In the screenshot pictured above both the light and the dark version of the image are on the same external display.
However, in the meantime I found a solution. Changing the Windows Color System device profile to a non-WCS-profile did the trick: Photos appear as black, gray rectangles | Lightroom | Windows
Thanks anyway for trying to help.

Drum loops are too low in volume vs guitars when overdubbing

After 8 hrs of learning Logic Express 9. I can't record the guitars "hot" because the Apple drum loops are too low in volume. I max them out with extra gain. I even duplicate them so I have two tracks. How can I get the drum loop volume up. I've tried everything I can think of to push it as loud as it will get. I've tried normalizing. I am assuming the quality of the guitar recording is related to how "hot" it's recorded or at least you shouldn't have to turn it down to about 20% when I overdub. I've got an M-Audio solo. Thanks.

Hi
Have you tried monitoring the guitars at a lower lever? You can still record them hot, but listen at a lower level.
From my LE8 manual...
Setting the Monitoring Level
If the Independent Monitoring Level (for Record Enabled Channel Strips) preference in
the Logic Express > Preferences > Audio > Devices > Core Audio tab is enabled, an
independent monitoring level is available when an audio channel is record enabled.
After arming the track, set the fader to the desired level. The original playback level will
be restored when the channel’s Record button is disabled.
Important: The Level fader only controls the playback (or monitoring) level, not the
recording level, when a track is record enabled. Recording levels must be set
externally—on your mixer, or at the original sound source. Care must be taken when
setting input levels, as digital audio will clip when overloaded. Clipping results in a
particularly harsh, metallic distortion, so unless you have a penchant for heavier
musical styles, overloading the inputs isn’t recommended (see “Understanding the Clip
Detector”
Cheers

Images too low-rez

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for