Implement 2-way matching for SRM PO

Hi Gurus,
   We are in SRM5.0 Extended Classic and currently running 3-way match scenarios. Client wants to implement 2-way match for certain Vendors. My question is how to accomplish this. Below are my thoughts. Please let me know if I missed any.
for 2 way match:
1. In ECC Maintain Vendor MAster - remove GR/IR indicator
2. In ECC Maintain Info records - remove GR/IR indicator
In SRM
1. use create Limit shop which defaults to 2 way (also gives option to select 3 way)
Please let me know if there are any config changes or new objects to be developed for 2-way match.
Thank you all
Rao

Hi Friends,
  any suggestions is appreciated.
Thanks
Rao

Similar Messages

  • Three way match for Service PO

    Is it possible to do 3-way match on Invoices for Service PO.
    I am able to do 3 way match on Invoice for goods PO, but when I create Invoice for Service PO it does not check the Service confirmation.
    Example for Service PO of 100$ when Service confirmation is done for 40$, I am able to process Invoice in R/3 for 100$ instead of 40$ for which confirmation has been done.
    I am SRM 4.00 ECC 5.0 with ECS.
    Thanks
    Venkatesh

    Hi Venkatesh,
    We are also having a similar requirement. We need 3 way match for service PO's in R/3 in Extended Classic scenario.
    I have couple of questions for you
    1. Are you able to trigger service entry sheet in SAP backend from the Service confirmation in SRM?Is this happening in standard automatically when you create and save the confirmation?
    2. When the service entry sheet is created in backend (replicated from SRM), does the GR also get created automatically?
    3. Were you able to fix your issue with 3 way match and able to do ERS for Service PO's?
    Regards,
    Srivatsan

  • Two way match for Services Purchasing

    Hi all,
    Was wondering if anyone has any experience with doing 2 way match for service po's (in SRM) only. I'd like to hear any issues or problems you mave have faced.
    Thanks

    HI,
    Local services procurement worked it best in SRM locally compared to having classic scenario with an ERP backend.
    It's definitely working without issues. You can even have SUS for the service provider to integrate seamlessly for your service purchasing.
    Regards.

  • OSB: Implementing 2 way ssl for a particular proxy

    Hi All,
    We have a requirement to implement 2 way ssl support for one of our OSB proxy and 1 way ssl support for all other proxies in our project.
    we have enabled HTTS on OSB and configured 2-way ssl on weblogic server. It is working fine.
    But the 2 way ssl configuration on weblogic server impacts all other proxy services deployed on that node. Because of weblogic configuration "Two Way Client Cert Behavior: Client Certs Requested and Enforced", the server expects all request to present the client certificate..
    But our requirement is, Only 1 proxy service should enforce 2-way ssl, all other proxies should only support 1 -way ssl(server authentication).
    Is there any way to implement our requirement?.
    we want to configure weblogic with "Two Way Client Cert Behavior: Client Certs Requested but not and Enforced OR Client Certs NOT Requested" and then in the proxy service we want to enforce client certificate..
    Is it possible to implement? If so can anyone help to explain the steps?
    Thanks in advance
    Edited by: user13109986 on Oct 24, 2012 9:30 AM

    It is a domain wide setting. Can you not create a new domain? I do not think that you can handle it from web.xml. I have never seen such thing in web.xml.

  • 3 way match of invoice in SAP for legacy PO

    My client is using legacy system for purchasing direct materials.   SAP FI has been implemented.  Customer like to carryout indirect purchasing (consumables - text purchase & MRO items) directly in SAP and hence we are configuring minimum org structure.  When we suggested about 3 way match of invoices to customer for indirect purchases, customer expressed interest to carryout 3 way match for direct purchases as well in SAP.    Please note that direct materials are procured in legacy system.
    Customer query :  Is it possible to carry out 3 way matching of invoices in SAP without material master & inventory management  for direct purchases happening in legacy system.  If so, please explain the solution and its pros and cons. Please share your experiences and lessons learned on similar requirement.. Also suggest alternate solutions..... Thanks for your time and help.

    a three way match is matching quantity and price  from purchase order, goods receipt and invoice receipt .
    If all  documents are done in SAP, then SAP will do this match when you enter the invoice
    But if you procure in a external system and use only SAP-FI to post and pay invoices, then you cannot have a automatic 3way match. In that case the 3way match must be done manually by the accountant.

  • How to enforce a three way match

    Hi,
      We are using SRM 5.0, ECC 6.0, ECS, Invocing in SRM. We are trying to enforce the three way match in SRM, so that the users should be able to enter the invoice but it should not be posted in to ECC until the Confirmation/GR is posted against that PO.
      We tried setting the GR-based-IV flag on the vendor master, but this is not letting the user submit the invoice against the unconfirmed PO.  Please share any ideas to achieving this.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Sree

    Do you use Invoice Management System? Found some useful information in this link.
    http://www.ies.state.pa.us/srm/lib/srm/2006_05_26_srm_007.pdf
    We post invoices directly in R/3. The invoice goes into blocked status till the confirmation is received for the PO. When the confirmation is received, the 3-way match is complete and invoice gets posted.
    Regards,
    Suren

  • 3 way match and value-based material only

    Hi guys,
    we have some problems with implementing 3-way matching in SAP for only-value based material type WERT. Problem is when we create a MIGO-posting for a WERT-material we get the error-message "Document doesn't contain any items" (M7061).
    What has to be maintained additionally? Or what could be a better way to solve?
    The reason why we need value-based materials is that we receive orders from separate legacy-systems and mirror them in SAP to be able to have 3-way matching within Logistic invoice verification. But the whole inventory management has to be still in the legacy system and only values should be posted in SAP.
    Hope that you have an idea how to solve that big issue we have.
    Thanks for your feedback.
    Kind regards,
    Tobias

    If you don't need any inventory management on SAP but only procurement I would also consider the account assignment category to avoid having to deal with any value and material master in SAP. I can have accounting setup balance sheet inventory account for the legacy inventory then use PO with account assignment 'X' using account assignment to the balance sheet account. this way, the value from the 3-way matech will post to the legacy inventroy G/L account. Accounting can then post journal entry at month end to adjust this value based on the legacy systems inventory valuation. Now, I would carefully consider the division of duty between the legacy inventory system and SAP procurement not to mirror too much since it will create a complex interface.

  • Create OCI catalog for SRM using Web Dynpro

    Hi all,
    Have you ever implemented an OCI catalog for SRM using web-dynpro?
    Please provide details.
    Regards,
    PooYee

    Hi PooYee,
    the BSP application would run the WD catalog and communicate with SRM.
    In a certain way it would "wrap" the WD catalog application and enable accessing the http header.
    This of course is not a trivial implementation.
    Send me a mail and maybe I can give you some more ideas.
    regards, Ulli

  • Mass approval functionality for SRM work items

    Hi,
    We want to implement mass approval functionality for SRM workflow, so that any user is able to approve/reject multiple requests at one go through UWL.
    Please guide if it is possible to implement this functinality for task id TS40007952.
    Regards,
    Avantika

    Hi Avantika,
    The mass approval functionality can be implemented for simple workflow items which have decisions to complete the work item. (User Decision Type)
    In SAP Business Workflow, user can define a task as a decision task by assigning DECISION as the underlying business object type. The task definition allows user to create two or more decision options to complete the task.
    The idea is to simply create a custom view/subview for the UWL item and configure it according to your needs.
    Have a look at this blog:
    Mass/Batch Processing of Work items in UWL
    and also check the documentation:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/4e/72112bc9ea484196f2a5fdc68f5f5f/frameset.htm
    Let me know if you have any questions.
    Thanks,
    Shanti

  • 3-Way Match with Multiple Invoices

    This may be a basic Oracle iProcurement functionality question, but i have been unable to get a good answer. Any information will be greatly appreciated.
    I am currently using Oracle 11i iProcurement.
    The problem I am having is I am unable to perform a 3-way Match in the system on purchase orders that will use multiple invoices. Our vendors require a tiered payment structure (i.e. 50% due up front before shipment, 30% due when item has reached shipment destination, and 10% due after our engineers have inspected the shipment).
    We have been currently using a 2-way match for all of our purchase orders because when we apply the first invoice against the PO (50%), the PO will automatically close before we can receipt the goods against the purchase order.
    Our Invoice Receipt Close % Tolerance and Invoice Close % Tolerance are set at 0%.
    Our goal is to receipt the first 50% against the purchase order, have the PO remain open, and receipt the goods in Oracle after the 2nd or 3rd invoice application against the PO.
    Thanks in advance.
    Edited by: user13053863 on Apr 28, 2010 2:44 PM

    Hmm, an interesting situation. What are the quantities on your purchase orders? Are they almost always a quantity of 1? Payables should only close a purchase order when quantity billed and quantity received is GT or equal to the quantity ordered. So if you order a quantity of 10, you could match for quantity 5 on the first invoice, quantity 3 for the second invoice, and quantity 2 for the final invoice. But since you don't receive the quantity until the 3rd invoice, you cannot match on receipts, so that would be a problem.
    Maybe you need to approach this from a different angle? Maybe you should look at the prepayments ability in Payables. Typically Prepayments will be charged to a Prepayment Account (asset). Say you have a purchase order for $10,000. You prepay $5,000 up front, so basically Debit Prepayment 5,000 and Credit Cash 5,000. Same for the next prepayment level - $3,000. Then you get the ordered material received. So you want to do an invoice for $10,000. Match the invoice to the purchase order. Apply the prepayments to the purchase order. Thus you get an entry something like Debit Inventory $10,000, Credit Prepayments $8,000, and Credit Cash $2,000.
    From an accounting perspecitive, you don't show the prepayments in inventory until received, but do show a prepayment asset. Which is reflecting what you really are doing I think.
    I have never worked for anyone who has had to do prepayments, but this is an area that you may wish to investigate as a possible solution for your situation. Good luck.
    John Dickey

  • How to maintain a check for 3 way match(PO, GR, Invoice) in SRM

    How to maintain/configure a check for 3 way match(PO, GR, Invoice) in SRM

    Hi Sam,
    Please use a Limit cart and select the radiobutton "Confirmation and Invoice" which will need a GR/Confirmation before Invoice on a PO.
    Please reward points if the hint is helpful.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Venkat

  • 2 way matching workflow for PO

    Hello All,
    We are trying to implement a workflow for 2 way matching PO approval unlike the standard 3-way matching setup with GR.
    We would like to know if there is any standard workflow that can be used to achieve this. If not, what's the best way to proceed?
    Your inpurs are highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Anil

    Then I think the answer is to write a Receiver Type Function Module.  Perhaps something like this?
    Do not use this code verbatim, sensitive portions have been removed.
    function z_wf_wbs_receiver_check_fm.
    ""Local interface:
    *"  IMPORTING
    *"     VALUE(OBJTYPE) LIKE  SWETYPECOU-OBJTYPE
    *"     VALUE(OBJKEY) LIKE  SWEINSTCOU-OBJKEY
    *"     VALUE(EVENT) LIKE  SWETYPECOU-EVENT
    *"     VALUE(GENERIC_RECTYPE) LIKE  SWETYPECOU-RECTYPE
    *"  EXPORTING
    *"     VALUE(RECTYPE) LIKE  SWETYPECOU-RECTYPE
    *"  TABLES
    *"      EVENT_CONTAINER STRUCTURE  SWCONT
    *"  EXCEPTIONS
    *"      NO_WORKFLOW
    *"      CONTAINER_ERROR
    This function module should be specified as a reciever function type
    in the Event Linkage Table for BUS2054
    It will check the field PRART on the WBS record against the table
    ZWF_WBS and determine the appropriate workflow to call.
      include <cntain>.
      include rsweincl.
    TABLES: ZWF_WBS.
      data : begin of wbs_key,
            pspnr like prps-pspnr,
            end of wbs_key.
      data l_subrc(4).
      data: l_proj_type like prps-prart.
      data: l_objnr like prps-objnr.
      data: wi_objnr like swotobjid-objkey.
      data: wbs_obj type swc_object.
      data: wi_id type swc_object.
      data: w_objectnumber like prps-objnr.
      data: w_jestobj like jest-objnr.
      data: w_status like jest-stat.
      data: w_userstatus like jest-stat.
      rectype = 'WS98800076'.      "Set the default WBS
      move objkey to wbs_key.
      select single prart objnr  from prps into (l_prart, l_objnr )
        where pspnr = wbs_key.
      if sy-subrc <> 0.
        raise no_workflow.
      endif.
        select single * from zwf_wbs
          where project_type = l_prart.
        if sy-subrc <> 0.
          exit.       "Use the default workflow
        endif.
        if zwf_wbs-wf_active ne 'X'.
          exit.        "Use the default workflow
        endif.
        rectype = zwf_wbs-wf_name.
      else.
        raise no_workflow.
      endif.
    endfunction.

  • GR/IR & Material GL accounts for 3 way match

    Hi All Experts,
    I have requirement where I have to configure the 3 way match scenario. For that I have to create material ( Stock) account, GR/IR account.
    I have some doubts regarding this if I get experts guidance it will be great help for me.
    Material Account
    1 ) Material as a P & L OR Balance Sheet account ?
    2 ) Reconciliation with material ? ( On control data tab in FS00 ! )
    3 ) Line item ticked ? and Open Item ticked ?
    4 ) Whether to define as cost element or not ?
    GR/IR Account
    1 ) GR/ IR account as a P & L OR Balance Sheet account ?
    2 ) Reconciliation with material ? ( On control data tab in FS00 ! )
    3 ) Line item ticked ? and Open Item ticked ?
    4 ) Whether to define as cost element or not ?
    and anything configuration point which I have missed can have guidance over that will be helpful.
    Regards,
    Sharvari Joshi.

    Hi,
    Material Account - Hope this is a stock A/c
    1 ) Material as a P & L OR Balance Sheet account - B/S A/c
    2 ) Reconciliation with material ? ( On control data tab in FS00 ! ) - No reconciliation type
    3 ) Line item ticked ? and Open Item ticked ? - Only line item display
    4 ) Whether to define as cost element or not ? - Not a cost element
    GR/IR Account
    1 ) GR/ IR account as a P & L OR Balance Sheet account ? - B/S
    2 ) Reconciliation with material ? ( On control data tab in FS00 ! ) - No reconciliation type
    3 ) Line item ticked ? and Open Item ticked ? - activate both
    4 ) Whether to define as cost element or not ? - Not a cost element
    You might need to check the config in OMR6.
    Regards
    SM

  • Is it mandatory to perform PO receiving for a 2 way matching Invoices in 12.0.6?

    Requirement :
    Supplier would send everyday some files with respect to the quantity delivered..This delivery would be ad hc and without against any PO#...Invoicing needs to go via a PO.
    Solution porposed :
    a) Create a Inventory Org for that specific vendor
    b) Create Misc receipts for the items sent based on the file received
    c) Create a 2 way match PO
    b) Create an Invoice and pay the vendor.
    Let me know if you see any loopholes with this solution.
    Thanks in advance!

    2 way matching in any version is between Qty Ord and Qty Billd.

  • Need SQL query for PO that do NOT have 3-way match.

    The question is -- have any PO"s been generated with other then 3-way match selected - which means they overrode the set-ups in purchasing , to see if there are an PO that do NOT have 3-way match.
    Thanks
    Mohan.

    1)Generally when ever we will do Supplier setup we will select in the Receiving tab Match approval level we will select either 3-way ,2-way,4-way or we will keep that as blank.
    for that we do not have any direct column in the back end ,so we will use the following conditions.
    '2WAY' inspection_required_flag = 'N'
    receipt_required_flag = 'N'
    '3WAY' inspection_required_flag = 'N'
    receipt_required_flag = 'Y'
    '4WAY' inspection_required_flag = 'Y'
    receipt_required_flag = 'Y'
    2)When ever we will create a PO in the shipments level what ever the Match approval level,
    we defined in the supplier will automatically reflects in the shipments-More tab.
    3)Here i wants to know all the PO's whihc are having Match approval level differences between supplier definiton and PO's match approval level.
    (i.e If i will select a supplier for a PO , automatically we will get one Match approvallevel from supplier setup .if i will change that match approval level manually in the PO shipments -More tab i wants to know all that PO by using a SQL query.
    4)But for some PO's i am getting receipt_required_flag and inspection_required_flag as null.But in the Supplier setup it may be one of the Matching approval.
    Thanks
    Mohan.

Maybe you are looking for

  • ITunes stopped using my library and data on an external drive suddenly.

    My iTunes folder is on volume H:\itunes since years. Today when I startet iTunes, all setting were resetted, the library was empty (apart from those cloud songs) and the path to the folder was set to C:\user\mymusic... When I set the path in the sett

  • Technical Flash problem in Keynote

    Hello! I have a question concerning the development of Flash files to use in Keynote. Whenever I use a flash movie that has another flash movie embedded in it the following occurs: the two movies play together at first, but revisiting the slide cause

  • WavesetException: XML Error: 1:1: Content is not allowed in prolog. error

    What gives? I have turned the exception trace on (why it is not on by default is a surprise) and when I try to create a standard Weekly Audit Report, (Activity this Week) I now get to see this exception. How on earth can IdM generate a badly formed X

  • Async call in OSB

    Hi, Our requirement is when the front end calls the proxy service, the proxy service should call the back end web service and give the response to front end service, This can be achieved. But the other requirement is in case if the back end service i

  • LE 8 and Korg Nano Pad

    I recently purchased Logic Express 8. I also have a Korg Nano pad which I used to play my chopped samples in Garageband. As of yet, I haven't figured out how to do the same in LE 8. In Garageband, I would assign my chopped samples to keys on the virt