Impossible to directly pick up account assignment value

Hello,
After searching account assignment (CC or WBS) value from the account item line it is not possible to send it to the shopping cart. It keeps the default value from org structure.
We have to go into the details of the account assignment to pick up the value
Any idea?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Not sure if this will work but if you dont mind, you can try it out. My current system have restriction for me to do any testing. Sorry.
SPRO --> Financial Accounting --> Accounts Receivable and Account Payable --> Customer Accounts --> Line Items --> Display Line Items --> Define Additional Fields for Line Item Display
Use the path above to add the additional field "Check number" to the table. Then go to the path below:
SPRO --> Financial Accounting --> Accounts Receivable and Account Payable --> Customer Accounts --> Line Items --> Display Line Items --> Display Line Items without ALV --> Define Standard Sorting for Line Item Display
Use the path above to create a new Sort Key which you can maintain it in the Vendor Master Data later on at the Sort Key Field. This Sort Key Field will be populated at the assignment field.
But the problem is, whether or not you are able to add the field "Check Number" in the sort key creation.
I'm sorry for not able to provide better solutions.

Similar Messages

Default account assignment values during the life time of the session

Hi Experts,
In SRM7.0 default account assignment values in 'Change Personal Default Settings' has to be retained in the life time of the user login.
Eg. A user enters into SRM7.0 web screen(NWBC) and will go to 'Change Personal Default Settings' and enters the values and saves the values and he will do other activities like creating SC and other things, when user logoff from the web screen (NWBC), the values should wipe off and when he logs in again, there shouldnt be any values in account assignment in 'Change Personal Default Settings'.
Thanks
SR

Sam,
our client's requirement is, those values has to be cleared when user logsoff from NWBC portal, when again he logsin, values should be blank and user can enter the values according to his/her requirement.
we tried to capture the action under 'Logoff' button, but, as this button is written in HTML/Java Script, we couldnt able to capture in SRM and I am not Java known person.
thanks
SR

Default G/L Account assignment value in Shopping Cart

Hello Experts,
Need your help but urgently.
There is a Requirement of creating new p.Category so inECC New material Grp is created and i repliczte the same in SRM system Development . Now i went to Default account assignment and assign my new P.Cateogry with default G/L account for Cost center.
It was working fine in Development but when i transport these settings to my SRM_quality system the source system for all the P.Categories Source system changes from QAS300SYCC to DEV300SYCC. i went to BDLS and run old and new logical system for table BBP_DET_ACCOUNT and source system gets changed but still when i create a Shppping cart default G/L account is not comming for all the P.Catoegories except the new one which i have created .
Smriti

Hi Smriti,
Please see the answer from a development colleague :
- We cannot recommend to transport IMG table V_BBP_DET_ACCT entries
from DEV to PROD for the following reasons:
a) F4-help entries of field CATEGORY_ID contains category GUIDs
     of LOGSYS DEV which may not exist in LOGSYS PROD.
b) If already entries in PROD exist in that IMG table it maybe
     overwritten.
- Recommendation:
Please maintain IMG table entries with CATEGORY_ID reference
always manually using F4-help (dropdown). Sorry for the inconvenience,
but CATEGORY_ID /GUID triggers backend finding and is a substantial
and unique key field in every SRM system which cannot easily be
reused in other logical systems.
Also see note 872533 top 3.
Hope this helps,
Kind Regards,
Matthew

G/L picking during account assignment P & Q

Hi Experts,
Please help me to clear one doubt:
With Q system is picking G/L account as per OBYC settings corresponding to valuation class of material irrespective of what G/L I enter manually here, a default G/L is picked and its understood. But with P (same material code) system is allowing me to enter G/L manually and saving of that PR/PO.
Kindly suggest why system is not validating material valuation class -> G/L combination with "P".
Thanks & Regards
Saurabh

Hi Ajit ,
This Field does not have any Impact on the automatic GL account in PO
Hi Saurabh
While Creating PO with A=P , System is automatically picking the GL account

Asking Account Assignment Category for Direct Materials

Experts,
ECS Scenario with PPS, ECC EHP4, SRM7.0.
The system is giving error as 'account assignment category is missing' for 'direct materials'. We have same problem while creating SC in SRM also and for PDP als.
Items with account assignment are working perfecly fine for both SC and PDP, for same product category.
For PDP: System did not give any error at PR stage, but if see log in SLG1 in SRM, we see that, it did not transfer to SRM as 'account assignment category' is missing.. moreover, If we create a standard PO item, for the same material group (without reference to PR) it is pefectly working. GR, IR everything is fine in ECC... So there should not be any problem in ECC account assignment(?).
We have not implimented any BADI. Just used the standard, as it is... Product category, location, storage location are maintained in PPOMA_BBP. Accounting system for vendor is also maintained...
What could be other possiblities? kindly help.
GH

hi
Can you create sc see account assignment folder though ypu order as direct material in PPS scenario?
please check BBP_PDIGP-subtype =dp and external requirement.
SAP has designed like that for PPS scenario
Direct materials with account assignment
check with SAP, Learn that SRM not creates a shopping cart for direct materials for the purchase requests.
since they are throwing explicitly error message
'account assignment category is missing' for 'direct materials'
Muthu

Vendor and Account Assignment Issues

Hi All,
Iam Working in ECS SRM 5.0,
When We are trying to creat SC, we are getting following errors :
1.Vendor 0000100029 not intended for purch. org. (Item Sourcing Strategy & Plan Consulting )
SOS is automatically assiged to particular product ID thru Purchasing Contract (Purchasing Contract created locally).Vendor is assigned to the Purchasing Contract.Vendor is properly mapped to the respective Purchasing Organization as recored in the table BBPM_BUT_FRG0061.Purchasing Contract is also mapped to the same Purchasing Organization of Vendor.
2.Account 50011 requires an assignment to a CO object (Item Sourcing Strategy & Plan Consulting )
2.1 Error in account assignment for item 1
Account assignment Categories and G/L Acc. are properly maintained and activated in SRM for each Product Category. same values for G/L Acc. and Acc.Assignment Categories are maintained in R/3. In R/3 when we checked in the tables SKA1,SKB1 & SKAT all these entries are maintained properly.
In our project Scenario we don't require CO Component only AP Component is Configured for our Business Requirement.
Full points will be rewarded for the solution.
([email protected])

Hi
Please go through this ->
Please implement following SAP OSS Notes ->
Note 1026168 - Vendor &1 not intended for purch. org. &2
[ This is caused due to a program error. The reason for this error is, purchasing organization and purchasing group are always assigned at header level and in this case SRM is passing the item guid to determine the backend purchasing organization and purchasing.group. The header guid should be passed instead. ]
Q 3: Why does the system issue message KI 235 - 'Account & requires an assignment to a CO object'?
Answer ->
--> In SRM, you always have to post to a G/L account and to a CO object. Exceptions: Direct material scenario - account assignment occurs in the OLTP regardless of what was previously entered in SRM. For external requirements, the primary system is the OLTP from which the demand is issued and sent to SRM. In this case, account assignment changes are not allowed in SRM because this would lead to inconsistencies (in follow-on documents as well) when compared to the primary system.
--> In /OBA5, you can suppress the message or define it as a warning message. Since only error messages are transferred to SRM (BBP_PD 047), the message then no longer is issued in SRM. Do not consult the FI/CO team when implementing the changes.
(See related SAP Consulting Notes - Release-Independent
Note 815849 - FAQ: Account assignment system response)
Hope this will definitely help. Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Account assignment Mandatory for material (Enter acc.***.cat)

Hi all,
Currently i would like to configure to have material with quantity update and no value update. so i create a new material type with reference to the material type -UNBW and i assign the material to this material type.
During the time i creating the PR with the material above, it not allow and forcing me to enter the account assignment category.
Kindly advise me what i have missing on this.
Thank you.
Kah Fei

Hi,
Yes, it will ask acc.***.cat, because it is the character of UNBW material type and as you copy from UNBW material type and created New one.
Consumable materials with a material master record must also have an account assignment.Non-valuated material [Material type UNBW, This type of { low in value }material is managed on a quantity basis, but not on a value basis] are coming under consumable material.
Consumable materials are materials that are procured directly for an account assignment object.
1. They are not managed on a value basis in Inventory Management.
2. Examples of consumable material:
Office material like pen, paper, text books assigned to a cost center
Computer systems, Water Purifier, Fire Alarm System assigned to an asset
3. The system automatically updates consumption for materials that have a material master record.
Pl explore yourself on stock material and consumable material.
Hope helpful and then reward.
Regards,
Biju K

Error in BAPI_PO_CHANGE when uploading a account assignment

Hi,
I am trying to change account fields in the Purchase Order. I am using BAPI_PO_CHANGE to change the fields in Purchase Order.
The Purchase order , item no and Account assignment values are given in the excel file. I need to upload every all the PO in the excel file.
And so i fill the BAPI structure for each PO and pass it to the BAPI.
The Problem i am facing is that when i update the Profit center values its throwing an error The Reuistioner (value) and item(10) is assigned to other order account and one more error is document entented is not a sales document

Hi,
It seems you have not filled material number or otherwise segment POITEMX is not correctly filled.
Sanjeev

Purchase order Account Assignment changes

Hi Guys,
May you please share the light?
Weu2019ve deleted Purchase order Account Assignment & entered the new one but the PO Item changes tells us old Account Assignment was deleted and the new one was entered but the system doesnu2019t tells us what was the old value on the item changes. I tried to check the old value on table EKBZ, CDHDR, CDPOS but I couldnu2019t find what the old Account Assignmnent was. Please let me know if there is a table I can use to find the old Account Assignment Value
Regards,
Sandile

HI
In ME22n in check the changes in header check
Environment: Item changes.
Here you can find the changes , as well as the old and new values.
Regards
Girish

Item category D can only be used with account assignment category

Dear Guru's,
While creating service PO, i am getting d above error
wat it is ? Is it mandatory to maintain Ac assignment cat along with item cat for service PO ?
regds,
CB

hi
Item category D is used for services .services can not be stocked like stock item... these are for direct consumption hence account assignment is mandatory for Item category D
u can enter K or U as account assignment and proceed with PO creation
Vishal...

Field Status control for fields at Account assignment level .

Hi All ,
I have to take care of enabling / disabling / hiding / making fields mandatory for some of the standard and custom fields for SC and PO depending on the Account assignment value .
I am not sure how to go about this .
I think this has to do something with the field status control .
SPRO -> IMG -> SRM sever -> cross application basic settings -> extension and field control ( personalization ) -> Configure control for fields of substructure .
I think i have to define some dyn class and also methods .
But not sure how to move ahead , how to declare class / methods , which super class to use , how will i get the req parameters for the methods , ...
Will appreciate a lot if somebody can guide me on this .
Regards,
Ambar Patil.

Hi ,
Check in SPRO for SRM -> Extensions and Field Control (Personalization) -> Configure Field Control.
The metadata configuration for enabling disabling actions/fields in SRM can be checked from the tables
This contains the data for all the business objects
Check in SM30 the following views:
/SAPSRM/V_MDA_HD for Header actions
/SAPSRM/V_MDA_IT for Item Actions
/SAPSRM/V_MDF_HD for header fields
/SAPSRM/V_MDF_IT fir IT fields.
You can customize your logic for enabling diabling the actions or fields by maintaining the entries in the corresponding customer views for this data
for e.g.
/SAPSRM/V_MDF_HC for header customer fields
/SAPSRM/V_MDF_IC for item customer fields
You need to maintain field enabled, disabled ,required based on your requirement.
Regards,
Neeraj

While Confirmation message As "No Account assignment details were adopted"

Hi,
One of User is getting message while confirmation " No Account assignment details were adopted.
Kindly suggest..
Thanks,
Ketki

what type of shopping cart / PURCHASE ORDER?
what about account assignment existing in the Purchase order?
Note 520514 - Limit, BBP_PD148: No account assignment details were adopted
Symptom
You create a shopping cart with limit and unknown account assignment. The shopping cart is not transferred to the back end and you receive error message BBP-PD 148 'No account assignment details were adopted'
Reason and Prerequisites
Creating a shopping cart with limit and unknown account assignment in the back end
Note 739509 - BBPPO01: SEARCH FOR ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT CATEGORY DOESN'T WORK
Symptom
In transaction 'Process Purchase Orders' you click the 'Find' button and in the Search Criteria in the 'Account Assignment Cat.' enter (For example: CC) and click the 'Start' button. You will recieve a message 'No account assignment details were adopted'. And the search results an empty list. And if you click again the 'Start' button for second timethen the search results the PO list. In summary, the search criteria with an entry in the 'Account Assignment Cat.' and without the 'Account Assignment Value' for every second click of the 'Start' button the search results the Purchase Order list.
Other terms
BBPPO01,Process Purchaser Orders, Search, Find, PO, Purchase Order, SAPLBBP_PDH_SEARCH, screen 1000, BBP_PDH_SEARCH, LBBP_PDH_SEARCHF20, Account assignment category, Account Assignment value, CC.
Reason and Prerequisites
This is a Program error. When searching the purchase orders with search criteria 'Account assignment Cat.' You have to also enter the 'Account Assignment Value' then only the search results the correct purchase order list. And if you enter only the 'Account Assignment Cat.'and not the 'Account Assignment Value' then the search will not result the PO list and you will recieve the message 'No account assignment details were adopted'.

Upload assignment value in GL

Dear Friends,
In Accounting Doc RV, I have this GL 221600.
I need to replace the contents of the Assignment field with another.
Foe eg in RV I have 50 GL 221600 line items & need to replace all the existing account assignment
value with some another manually.is there a way I can upload the value at one go.
Pls help

are you saying the assignment field for the customer entry is correct but for the GL account it is not?
If that is the case you could either do a mass update of the assignment field from the customer entry to the GL account entry.
However to correct this at source you need a substution that looks at the customer assignment value and copies it into the GL account entry.

Product category account assignment relation

Hi Experts,
I have deleted a relation between a product cat 1234311 with WBS in the spro configuration. when i am trying to create a SC with the same product cat 1234311 with WBS element. system is not giving any error message and it allowing me to create a SC in the system.
Could you some suggest me on this. our requiremnt is that for the product cat 1234311 users should not be able to use WBS while creating a SC.
Regards,
Satish

Hi Satish,
Please use BADI - BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI to validate the required fields and throw error messages in case particular account assignment category is used with regards to a concerned product category.
The product category and account assignment combination is maintained to pick the account assignment details by default if a particular product category is used.
The system do not throw any error messages until and unless the account assignment details used are valid.
Hope this clarifies you and helps in resolving your issue.
Regards,
Teja

Assigning value to an input account

Hi,
We have an input account in our Account dimension. In the rule file (maybe in the consolidation routine) can we write a code which assigns a value to an input account. The assigned value maybe another account value or a static value based on a logic.
Thanks

If by "input account" you mean a leaf-level account that has no children, the answer is "yes", but with a qualification. In normal circumstances, for the rule to post the value to the account it needs to have the "IsCalculated" parameter set to "Y". This means the account can no longer have data posted to it via FDM, grids or forms.
The other possibility is the use of allocation functions &/or routines but this is an area I have not explored personally in HFM.

Impossible to directly pick up account assignment value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for