Improve My Workflow for Video Interview: Lowering Spikes

I do video interview constantly and I record Audio Separate from Video. But I'm still perfecting the Audition Workflow.
Attached is a quick 1minute video that shows my whole audio workflow (sped up exponentially).
Step 1: Import Audio into Audition
Step 2: Comb through the audio and lower all spikes (for instance, beginning of a sentance where the voice comes out louder than the rest of the audio) so all audio levels are consistent
Step 3: After Step 2, use Effect/Amplitude and Compression/Normalize (Process) to -2.0 dB
Step 4: Capture Noise Print (background noise)
Step 5: Noise Reduction
I feel like there's a much faster way to do Step 2 that I'm missing. A way to auto-detect spikes that go above x level and lowers them to x level?
The end result of my process is good it just takes a LONG time.
Any recommendations?

C. Blake wrote:
Is there any benefit to using your first method (normalize, single band compressor) over the Speech Volume Leveler? I'd rather put a little extra work into the files to have better audio, but if they essentially have the same results the SVL seems way easier!
The reason that I prefer the first method is simply because I think I can get more control over the individual process steps, and I'm inclined towards that rather than a 'hit it all in one go' approach, but really that's just a personal thing - and the way I've always done it. The SVL is a relative latecomer, after all!
You've just saved me a ton of time, I'd love to buy you a coffee for your great advice, is there any way I can donate a few bucks to you?
In view of the truly awful things that have happened to this forum, I only have one suggestion to make if you really want to do this - but I should emphasise that there's absolutely no compulsion or need to - and that is to go over to the AudioMasters forum (this is the forum that grew directly out of Syntrillium's original forum for Cool Edit, where all the archives, etc are kept) and hit the Donate button. We've kept that forum alive for a long time now, and you'll get just as good advice there as you will here - certainly in terms of general techniques, etc. Even Audition's developers pop in occasionally. It's important to keep it going, as at this rate it's going to be the only place where you'll get straightforward answers to questions about Audition, without losing yourself in a complete mire of social forum junk here for which there appears to be no good reason at all. Sorry about the rant, but it's got to quite a few people this week...

Similar Messages

  • Can someone check my workflow for video editing?

    I have a question about my workflow with my Adobe Products.  I'm hoping someone can check my workflow.
    I feel like I understand most of this process but I have a few questions listed below.
    If someone could please read and tell me where I might be able to speed up my workflow I would be appreciative.
    Any help is appreciated!!!!!!!!!
    Questions-
    • Why do my exports take so long with Premiere and Media Encoder?
    • Why does Premier take anywhere from 5-10 minutes to fully load my projects?
    • Why does Premier take so long to load my previously rendered preview files?
    • Are my settings OK with Media Encoder?
    • Why can't I get Media Encoder to export higher than a resolution of 786x524 for MP4?
    Computer Specs:
    MacPro, 2.8 Quad Core, 10GB RAM, ATI Radeaon HD 5770 1024MB, Mac OSX Mavericks 10.9.5
    Software: Using Adobe CS 6 software,
    A typical project for me:
    Resolution 1000 x 563px, 10 minutes long, to be played/viewed on the Web.
    My workflow and settings in more detail:
    • I usually start in After Effects then move the AE comps into Premiere and edit with many other clips, then export to ProRes, finally I compress that ProRes file (Adobe Media Encoder) to a variety of necessary formats.
    I start with After Effects and create about 20 or 30 projects, each is anywhere from 5 seconds to 30 seconds long.
    I start a new Premier Project (Preview Files set to QT, H.264, 1000x563px) and import the AE comps directly into Premiere.Premiere has to render my AE comps but I like the flexibility of being able to "go-back" and alter my AE file, it auto updates in Premiere
    I edit all my clips in Premiere, my entire timeline is rendered and has the Green Line.Anytime I close my project and reopen it. Premiere takes about 5-10 minutes to load the project.  Premiere initially opens quickly but takes a long time to link up all the rendered preview files.  This seems way too long
    Upon finalizing my project in Premiere I export out to ProRes 422.
    Settings For this is: Export Video, Same Resolution as project, Quality 100%, 30fps, Progressive, Square Pix, 24bit, Use Max Render Quality, Use Frame Blending.
    For my 10 minute animation this takes about 45 minutes. I feel like that's OK.  My AE clips can be a bit heavy with stills, particles, effete and etc
    This results in about a 11GB ProRes file.  Does that sound right?
    I now have a fantastic ProRes  copy of my hard earned work.... but I need to encode it to get it on the web, to clients, to friends, to the Universe.
    I import this file into Adobe Media Encoder.  I need to get this into 3 different formats, .H264, FLV and .MP4.  This processes usually take about 12 hrs for me.  Seems too long.
    MP4 settings: Multiplexer MP4/ Standard, Dimensions I can't get them above 786x524 this is frustrating, Level: Advanced Level 5, VBR 1pass 1,500
    FLV Settings: Format FLV, Dimensions 1000x563, VBR 2 pass, Bitrate 1,200, default target rates and Key Frame
    h.264 settings: Codec H.264, Dimensions 1000x563, 30fps, Progressive, Square Pix, Optimized Stills, Bit Rate 1,500
    That's about it.

    You're missing the JSTL JAR's in the classpath.

  • Is the Adobe Workflow for Video Lossy?

    I'm coming from Sony Vegas which was an all-in-one solution.  No round-tripping from application to application.
    The Adobe workflow is, obviously, very different.  The question is, is it a workflow that retains optimal quality.  If you are having to render out the video file multiple times, you're losing quality along the way, are you not? 
    What do you do to retain quality from start to finish? 
    Thanks.

    I don't use Speedgrade.
    These are recommended codecs for DI use in Premiere:
    Lagarith Lossless Video Codec (pc only)
    http://lags.leetcode.net/codec.html
    Ut Video Codec Suite (pc or mac / lossless)
    http://www.videohelp.com/tools/Ut-Video-Codec-Suite
    Avid Codecs 2.3.7 - DNxHD (pc or mac) / 'virtually lossless'
    http://avid.force.com/pkb/articles/en_US/download/en423319
    All you need to know about encoding DNxHD by Fuzzy Barsik:
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/5331048#5331048
    Alternatively, you can use uncompressed image sequences
    as a lossless Digital Intermediate file.

  • Specs and workflow for creating opening/closing titles for video

    I'm trying to create specs/workflow for videos that I will be adding opening and closing titles to (black background with colored text), using QuickTime Player 7 (Pro).
    The videos are .mov, AVC coding, 1280x720, millions, 30fps, a sample video had a data rate of 7,463 kbits/second.
    I created 1280x720 300dpi (perhaps I should have used 72dpi?), saved as a .jpg (highest quality), then copied the .jpg contents into a QuickTime Player 7 (Pro) blank document multiple times until I had enough frames for my need. The resultant video was very large; 339,743 kbps/second. I then exported to H.264, which brings the data rate down to only 214 kbits/second (and looks fine) and then copied that into the head of my AVC coding video.
    Questions:
    1) When I exported to H.264, the x pixels increased by 6, to 1286. After pasting that video into the AVC coding (1280x720) video, the resultant movie is 1280x720. Did my graphic get compressed by 6 pixels horizontally?
    2) Does my method of converting the huge graphic movie to H.264, and then pasting it into the AVC coding make sense? The combined video has AVC coding, according to Movie Inspector; does the H.264 of the graphic get converted automatically? Any better way to approach creating my titles?
    Note: these AVC coding videos may get converted to H.264 for some use, but for now, I'm keeping the highest quality (source) video I have to work with.
    Thanks,
    Bob

    "First, tell use why you're not using FCP's titling and keying capabilities."
    I don't own FCP.
    "Then, explain why you're doing it this way."
    I'm able to create graphics with plenty of control in a graphics program (PhotoShop in this case).
    "There is no dpi in video, there are only pixels."
    Sorry, I posted my thread then realized I left out a bit of info, but couldn't edit the post. I should have written that I created my graphics file in PhotoShop, hence the dpi reference.
    "A black background for text is not the same as using an alpha channel."
    OK. The portion of my video with titling stands by itself; that is, I'm not overlaying titles on existing video. Is there a use for alpha channel if I'm working up standalone title video frames? Uses less data rate?
    It seems from your inference I would be best served by purchasing FCP, so I'll probably take that advice and buy it.
    From a general video production point of view, I'd still like to learn more about creating titles in a graphics app and bringing them into QT Player; what format to bring them in as (e.g., H.264 into an AVC coding video, as I've done, or ?), and what happens when my graphics video gets converted from 1280x720 to 1286x780 (AVC export to H.264), and then brought into an AVC codec movie, and the movie remains at 1280x720-- does the graphic get horizontally widened, or the vertical compressed? Thanks.
    Bob

  • Workflow for recruitment procedure

    Hi
    I need help in creating a workflow for the recuitment process of my company, which is a long process involving several rounds of interviews.
    I tried finding a standard template for the same but the templates are available only for e-recruitment scenario.
    Please let me know the standard template name for the same and guide me to caary it out as I am new in this feild.
    Thanks in advance.
    Krishna

    Hi Krishna,
    These are the some standard workflow for the interview processing check this.
    WS00200036      Interview                Interview Applicant
    WS00200038      Applicant               Applicant Processing
    WS00200073      Selection               Applicant Selection
    WS00200037      Selection               Applicant Selection
    Hope any one of this will suit to your requirement, if that is the case award me points.
    Regards
    Balaji E.

  • Adobe Photoshop for Video Workflows: New Features and Timesaving Tips | Adobe at NAB 2013 | Adobe TV

    See the latest features in Adobe Photoshop and learn time saving techniques video editors and motion graphics designers can benefit from when using Photoshop for video workflows.
    http://adobe.ly/14eyrIi

    Great tutorial. When I build a timelapse I start by importing the image sequence and then make the proper frame size on export. Is there a benefit to creating a project at the proper frame size and rate first?
    Thanks

  • Workflow for moving photos/videos from iPhoto to LR

    I used to use iPhoto, but have switched to LR. I'd like to move all the images/videos I have in iPhoto to LightRoom.
    What is the workflow for making this move?
    thanks
    Greg

    You can't run an iPhoto Library from a NAS. iPhoto needs to have the Library sitting on disk formatted Mac OS Extended (Journaled). Users with the Library sitting on disks otherwise formatted regularly report issues including, but not limited to, importing, saving edits and sharing the photos.
    You can't convert a Managed Library to a Referenced Library (see below for definitions of managed and referenced) with iPhoto - and you probably shouldn't anyway, especially when the masters are on one volume and the library on another. See
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3062728?tstart=0
    for more on why.
    With Aperture, you can easily have the Masters on one volume and the Library on another, and you can convert the Library from Managed to Referenced easily.
    However, if you di any editing your planned set up will not work. Both iPhoto and Aperture will never edit your original file. All processing in these apps is virtual. So, if you fix red-eye for instance, the image in iPhoto/Aperture will have the red-eye fixed. But the image on the NAS will be your original file, with the red-eye. So any device that accesses the images directly from the NAS will have he original image, not the processed one.
    Is that what you want?
    Regards
    TD
    Definitions:
    A Managed Library, is the default setting, and iPhoto copies files into the iPhoto Library when Importing. The files are then stored in the Library package
    A Referenced Library is when iPhoto is NOT copying the files into the iPhoto Library when importing because you made a change at iPhoto -> Preferences -> Advanced. (You unchecked the option to copy files into the Library on import) The files are then stored where ever you put them and not in the Library package. In this scenario you are responsible for the File Management. 

  • Best workflow for splitting up a long video into series of short videos

    I've got an hour worth of footage, a series of speakers, each who speak about 3 min. I want each speaker to be a separate video on youtube.
    What's the fastest workflow for doing this?
    Also, why does youtube export take so long in Final Cut Pro? It's excruciating.

    Make four separate sequences and edit each speaker into a separate sequence.
    Export to QuickTime Movie. Take that to Compressor and use the template there.

  • What is the documetary interview workflow for Story/Premiere CS5.5?

    I've looked in vain for the answer to this question, which I'm sure is thoroughly documented SOMEWHERE - I just can't find it.  The few things I HAVE found online including at Lynda.com or other paid services involve CS5, which has a different workflow that involves OnLocation; this changed in CS5.5 but I don't see any on-point articles that incorporate the changes.
    We've been using Premiere CS5.5 since its release but have never worked with dialogue metadata.  At the moment we're working on a documentary with a number of lengthy interviews.  In each case the interview subject is talking to an off-camera producer.  Accurate transcriptions of the raw interviews have been prepared.  Only the interview subject's ANSWERS are transcribed; the producer's questions are not (and are also barely audible on the soundtrack).  So, typically, the producer will ask a question and then the subject will give an answer that could be ten seconds or a minute.  Then another question, then another answer, all in the one clip.
    So what I am looking for is a step-by-step workflow (for someone who has never so much as TOUCHED Adobe Story before) for importing the transcripts into the raw footage and then ultimately having Premiere match the transcript up with the spoken audio, and then maximizing the usefulness of this with the newly annotated clips as source footage.  Realizing that the interview answers are separated by barely-audible producer's questions, I assume that one challenge will be to let the software know that it should only be paying attention to the answers, and lining the text up appropriately, and not getting confused by the questions.  Perhaps the answers need to be subclipped?
    If there's a tutorial on this subject I would very much appreciate being pointed to it.  If not, if someone could do a step-by-step (beginning with an empty Premiere CS5.5 project and nothing in Story) I'm sure there must be a number of other folks in my position who would benefit from it.
    As a product suggestion: for documentary applications it seems to me that it would be much better to be able to cut and paste text directly from a text editor into Premiere and then let it fit it to the audio instead of going through Story.  While I understand it was even more cumbersome prior to CS5.5, I don't think interviews in a documentary need most of what Story offers (unless I'm missing something), so it seems like an unnecessary complication that could be eliminated.
    Thanks in advance for any help.
    Peter

    Well, I tried following your steps, and I'm going wrong somewhere.
    I created the film script and four scenes (one for each of four clips), giving the speaker's name as a character name (it's actually the same character in a continuous interview broken into several five-to-ten minute clips).  I let Story number the scenes (1 through 4, as expected).  I then exported an .astx file.
    Within Premiere, I located the four clips and in the Scene column numbered them 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively.
    When I right-click on one of the clips, select "attach script file," and point to the exported .astx file, I get the following error message: "Failed to attach script file to the following clip: \MyProjectName.prproj\FolderNameWIthinProject\00019.mts [Matching scene number not found]" (of course I have replaced the path and folder names in this example with generic names since the actual names reveal my client company's name).
    Opening and inspecting the .astx file in a text editor I confirm that it does in fact contain scene numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, for the numbered scenes.  Likewise I confirm the numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, in the Scene number column for the four relevant clips.
    Any idea what the problem is?
    Peter

  • Best workflow for using iMovie as a long term home video storage

    I want to store all my home videos in iMovie since it's organizes them well and integrates with Front Row and iLife.
    As we know iMovie converts videos to AIC codec when importing which makes them insanely large. AIC is quick and good for editing but it makes no sense to store videos like that.
    On the other hand H.264 codec is good for storing and playing videos. iMovie can work with H.264 .mov but it makes editing just a little slower.
    I suggest the following workflow:
    - Import videos from a camcorder.
    - Edit imported videos - remove junk, trim, etc.
    - Make iMovie project to produce nice movie for family (if needed).
    - Batch convert imported videos to H.264.
    This will make iMovie library up to 80% smaller in size. And videos will still be available for playing and editing in iLife.
    Can you suggest a better workflow?

    {quote:title=AppleMan1958 wrote:}I would not convert them to h.264, because if you re-use, you will have a generational data loss as your reconvert to AIC.{quote}
    Are you sure I will have to reconvert to AIC? I tried putting H.264 encoded clips into events and iMovie seems to deal with them the same way. Just editing (selecting, scrubbing) is a little slower.
    How do you suggest storing home footage?

  • Workflow for cropping video from UHD to full HD

    I have some GoPro 4K (3840x2160) UHD video that I wish to crop to full HD (1920x1080) using Premiere Pro CC 2014.2.  My aim is to incorporate the cropped video into a project that contains nothing but full HD video.  I’m aware that cropping is throwing away a lot of the original video information, but that’s’ exactly what I want.
    I’m not sure how to go about doing this.  For example, prior to cropping, do I create a sequence that matches the original GoPro 4K footage and place the GoPro video in that sequence, or create a sequence that is equal to the finished video resolution (in my case 1920x1080) and place the original GoPro video in there?
    I’d also like to know how best to use the warp stabilizer effect in conjunction with the cropping. Should I warp stabilize the 4K video and then crop, stabilize the cropped video (which would introduce some scaling), or maybe crop to some intermediate resolution, and warp stabilize that first (I’m thinking this may reduce processing time)?
    I've never attempted cropping before, so I’d really appreciate if someone could give me an idea on the workflow for cropping and stabilizing, or any tips to get me started.
    Thanks in advance,
    Steve

    I think I’ve managed to achieve what I’m after.  As you quite rightly say, I need a nested sequence.  What I’ve done is create the sequence at full 3840x2160 resolution.  I’ve then set the crop size to 50% (which gives me my intended output resolution of 1920x1080).  At this point, I'm actually working on only 1/4 of the original frame.  I have my little crop box floating around in a sea of black in the context of how much of the original frame I'm intending to discard.
    I’ve then keyframed the crop to allow me to move it around and follow the action within the video that I want to focus on.
    After that, I enable the zoom option within crop effects settings, and finally, export the video at 1920x1080.
    As far as I can ascertain, I’ve ended up with a 1920x1080 resolution video cropped out of the 3840x2160, and because I started with such a high resolution video to begin with, the part I’ve actually wanted to keep is at full HD with no loss of quality.
    I now need to figure out how to apply warp stabilization for best results.  I have a number of ideas on this but need to experiment to see how it turns out.
    Steve

  • When im facetiming with someone and im watching a youtube video at the same time, the volume for the youtube video is lowered and the facetime volume stays the same, how can i change that?

    When im facetiming with someone and im watching a youtube video at the same time, the volume for the youtube video is lowered and the facetime volume stays the same, how can i change that?

    Have you ever even used skype on an iphone or ipod?  We tried it and there is no way to type to each other while you are video chatting.  You can do the typing during the video on a COMPUTER, but not on an iphone or ipod.

  • Ask a Pro: Demystifying Audio – Adobe Audition for Video Editors Jul 25, 10AM PT

    Demystifying Audio – Adobe Audition for Video Editors
    Thursday, July 25h, 2013 |10:00 AM Pacific Time
    Presented by: Larry Jordan
    "The best way to improve the quality of your picture is to improve the quality of your sound" - Larry Jordan
    The first question many video editors ask is: "why should I consider using an audio application for my projects?"
    In this special presentation, Larry Jordan will show you how you can use Adobe Audition to create better videos.
    Starting with an overview of the application, Larry will then demonstrate how Audition can make your life a lot easier.
    During this 45-minute presentation, you'll discover:
    How to send files and projects between Premiere Pro and Audition
    How to remove hum from an interview How to remove background noise
    How to maximize audio levels without causing distortion
    How to do an audio mix of your project
    How to create "stems," or submixes, of your dialog, effects, and music tracks
    How to test your final mix to be sure it meets all technical specs before submitting it to the client.
    The session will be followed by a Q&A.
    Audience: video editors, postproduction professionals, audio pros
    Applications: Adobe Audition CC and Adobe Premiere Pro CC.
    Workflows with other NLEs will also be discussed.
    http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/event/index.cfm?event=detail&id=1903730&loc=en_us&sdid=KCTHJ

    I don't think this will be on Adobe TV, but you can view the Adobe Connect recording of the session here:
    http://bit.ly/askcspro_0826
    If the audio stream doesn't play, or loses synch, try moving the playhead forward/backward a bit. That should kick it back into synch.
    I plan to have a little guide to the session, along with some helpful links, posted later today.

  • Workflow for adding 300+ simple titles

    Hi,
    I'm about to start a new project that involves adding about 300+ kids names to each 1 minute video segment of each child. When it's finished I'll deliver on 4 DVDs.
    I'll occasionally need to move sections of kids between sequences so that each DVD is about equal in length. I want to make sure the title stays with the child.
    I know how to do this in the simple case -- place my segments in the timeline, add a second video track. Then repeat x300:
    In the viewer choose Generators->Text->Text.
    Click "Controls"
    Click in the "SAMPLE TEXT" area.
    Type the kid's name over the words "Sample Text".
    Click "Video"
    Move the wireframe down so that it's in the lower third.
    Click on the duration.
    Change the duration to 3 seconds.
    Apple-2 to bring up the canvas.
    Apple-F10 to overwrite (Don't ask me why it's not plain F10 as the mouseover hint implies, I can't figure that out)
    ' ' to move to the next edit point.
    My question is, is there a way to improve this workflow and make it more efficient? I intend to also name the segments with the child's name, so that I can find them easily if that parent requests an individualized cut. (Right now they all have names like "Segment 39 from Saturday Tape 02") Ideally I'd like to pull the "SAMPLE TEXT" text from the name of the segment, so that I only have to type each name once, while naming the segment.
    Is there a way to save my text settings and bring them up quickly with keyboard shortcuts? I can't figure out how to get a keyboard shortcut to get to the "Controls" tab of the Viewer window.
    Thank you,
    --Beth

    I asked our PowerPoint geek about this and he said:
    If all you have is a hammer...
    Thanks for trying though.
    The solution posted eariler is much simpler, creating the list in word still requires the TAB keystrokes to get to the next entry, and it doesn't have the integration of "What am I looking at as I title this?"
    The solution above is basically "Do some setup, then:
    Type the kid's name.
    Tab.
    F10.
    Cmd-1
    Tab.
    Type next kid's name, 5 keystrokes, type next kid's name, 5 keystrokes...
    It's very easy. I've even re-mapped "bring up the viewer" (previously Cmd-1) to the semicolon to mimize multi-finger keystrokes.
    Speaking of minimizing multi-finger keystrokes, I attempted to re-map "Edit Marker" in the browser (orignially some combo involving M) to a single keystroke, but nothing I tried worked. I tried the letter 'g' and 'y' and 'r' and a few others, but most seemd to jump me either ahead or back in the browser list. I found a workaround while searching for a solution, but I'm still wondering if anyone knows why this is?
    For completeness, the reason I was doing this is that my original footage is captured as one complete chunk then markers added with DV start stop detect. I wanted to make sub-clips and have them have reasonable names, but there was no keyboard shortcut to do that (or so I thought) so I was editing the marker names using a re-mapped CMD-G, but I wanted it to no longer need the CMD in front.
    When seeking a solution for that problem I learned that hitting the ENTER key on the numeric keypad will allow me to edit a subclip name directly, which is actually better for my purposes.
    Thanks again for all the help!! (Even in forums where I didn't ask the question, only searched for answers)
    --Beth
    PS. People reading this far into the thread are probably efficiency nuts like me, so I thought I'd share that the reason I used CMD-G to edit the marker is that I name each one with the reel and segment number followed by the text name. For the reel and segment number I cut (CMD-C) the first one, then paste it as the default name in the field for each subsequent marker, changing only the last digit. i.e. "01-003 Firstname Lastname" I cut-and-paste the "01-00" portion. I'd hold down on CMD and hit 'gv' and type the digit and the name.

  • Workflow for marking clips and then exporting them out as individual clips with audio?

    Hello,
    I'm just starting to use Prelude.  I recorded an interview for my daughter for a school project last week.  The interview went well, but I want to mark as "sub-clips" all of the video interview's question/answer combos (e.g. "What is your name?  My name is John Doe.") and then save them out to individual clips rather than have to manage the full size files (about 40GB in all from my Panasonic GH3, 50mbps, IPB MOV) with clip markers.  I'll keep the originals as backups, but would really rather work with the individual clip files.
    Any help with this would be greatly appreciated!  I would think this would be a very simple and common function.  Basically, just dividing up the original video into multiple, standalone video clips with the same bit-rate, encoding, etc., but with new headers/EOF markers.  Just chopping the original files up into chunks with no changes or reencoding necessary.  If I can do it the way I imagine it, it should be a very quick process, at least compared to transcoding the files.
    Best regards,
    Scott

    Hi -
    Meg The Dog's suggestion will work if you don't intend to bring in all of your media off the card.  The Partial Ingest method will allow you to selectively create subclips during ingest and not transfer the full original clips.
    However, you do state you plan to keep all your media - not just the parts you want to subclip. So here's my suggestion for the workflow:
    1. Ingest all your media from your cameras (the entire clips - not the partial clip method)
    2. Open each clip from the Prelude Project Panel and create your Subclip Markers using Prelude logging tools.
    3. In the Project Panel you will find new entries will appear for each SUBCLIP Marker you add to your master clips.
    4. You can organize you subclips into BINS as needed to keep track of the segments of your video
    5. When you're ready to create your timeline of subclips you can either
       5a. EXPORT all the SUBCLIPS into their own files (select all subclips you want to export and use the FILE->EXPORT->MEDIA menu command)
       or
       5b. Drag-Drop your subclips into a ROUGHCUT in Prelude to order your story. Then use the SEND TO PREMIERE PRO feature to send the Rough Cut into Premiere pro where you can finish your edit. All the media will come along for the ride into Premiere Pro (including your Subclips). You can then add titles and any effects easily enough in Premiere Pro).
    There are some other options here you can also try out which might be interesting. For example, you can add transitions and any additional audio tracks to your ROUGH CUT directly in Prelude and then EXPORT the Rough Cut as a final movie - and not need to move to Premiere Pro unless you have wider editing needs.
    Hope this helps!
    Regards,
    Michael

Maybe you are looking for