Include the Content Released status flag in default WC data control

Hi,
We have integrated custom webcenter portal application with UCM for documents integration. The integration was done using default data control.When we change the document which is getting displayed in the portal from UCM and check it into the system, wokflow gets triggered properly and the content status shows review status. But when we access the document in the portal, at that point of time new document is visible even though the content is still not released from the system.
Can anyone of you let me know how to include the released status of the content in the default data control so that we can avoid this situation
Regards,
Boopathy

First of all, I think this is more a question to WebCenter Portal, because it is how WebCenter Portal components are written.
Another thing is, that this is probably 'works as designed' and there might be good reasons for that. Since PS3, WebCenter (Portal) exposes some of UCM's functionality, among them ability to approve items in a workflow. This is the reason why it makes a good sense that items are available. Of course, they should be available only to approvers; also unapproved items should not appear if an item is displayed via Content Presenter (compare to a document published on a website via WCM). If you found such a behaviour, please, report it to MetaLink as it might be a bug.

Similar Messages

Approval Workflow does not update the Content Approval status if started automatically

Hi,
I’m using a simple Approval Workflow associated with
Content Approval on site pages. It works fine when I set it to be started manually (by using
Allow this workflow to be manually started by an authenticated user with Edit Item permissions
option) and on the completion of the workflow the
Content Approval status is updated accordingly. But when I set it to be started automatically (by using
Start this workflow when a new item is created
/ Start this workflow when an item is changed
options), it does not updates the Content Approval status. Note that I’ve set the
Update the approval status after the workflow is completed (use this workflow to control content approval)
option to true.
Regards

Hello,
It is recommended to select "Start this workflow to approve publishing a major version of an item" when you want to use the workflow to manage content approval for
a library.
According to the Notes for “Enable Content Approval” option in
this reference:
If you are using this Approval workflow to manage content approval (moderation) for a library, and you selected the Start this workflow to approve publishing a major version
of an item check box on the Add a Workflow page..
If you did not select the Start this workflow to approve publishing a major version of an item check box on the Add a Workflow page because you do not want this workflow to
be the default content approval workflow for a library, you can select the Update the approval status (use this workflow to control content approval) check box to make this workflow a secondary content approval workflow that specific users can
start manually.
That means having an approval workflow start automatically when a document is changed or created is not a good practice when you want to use the workflow to manage
content approval for a library. You should either select "Start this workflow to approve publishing a major version of an item" or give users the option to start the workflow manually at the time they want to submit for an approval.
Thanks & Regards.
Lily Wu

How to include the missing PF status in screen

Hello All,
How to include the missing Pf-status in screen?
Regards,
Lisa.

check if the pf-status you use currently has all needed functions
if yes, probably you call it with an EXCLUDING statement and you have to remove some functions from the internal table of exclusions
if no, you have either to enhance this pf-status with additional functions either to copy it and enhance the copy, then call the copy in your program

[svn:fx-trunk] 8562: The comments for my previous integration of TLF Build 468 should have included the following release notes :

Revision: 8562
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-07-14 14:40:37 -0700 (Tue, 14 Jul 2009)
Log Message:
The comments for my previous integration of TLF Build 468 should have included the following release notes:
Build 467

Thats good news.

How do I change the overall size of a document including the contents?

I have created a document for web at 1024 x 768. I would like to reduce the size of the document without having to resize all the content manually. Is there an easy way to do this?

See my previous post: check 'Show Import Options' in Place box. then you'll get another dialog box, similar to this:
Here you can specify page range, crop options, layers visibility.
However, if your document contains too many pages to manage them manually (as it is on my screenshot), you should consider another option of placing - this nice Zanelli script:
http://indesignsecrets.com/zanelli-releases-multipageimporter-for-importing-both-pdf-and-i ndd-files.php

Abap report for PO details including the person releasing the PO last.

Hi gurus,
I need to create a abap report for the purchase order details. I am finding difficulty in getting the last person who released the PO. Can anyone tell me how can I get the person who released the PO last ??
From which table I can get this detail ??

Hey hi ,
thanks for your reply,
Actually , I already went through the tables before, but here, there is one scenario listed below which is creating the problem :
1. There are two person related with the release of PO and either of the two can release the PO ( in other's absense ). Now, how to check who released the PO among the two. Here link with the PO is necessary as the person released this PO might not release the next PO.
Thats why i feel the link of the PO must be existing based on release code too. As suppose the organization assign another manager to release the PO, it should not affect previous PO's released by the Old manager.
thanks
Edited by: kanak bhandari on Feb 6, 2008 1:19 PM

How to create content based portlet in 10g using JCR Data Control.

I have created a webecenter Application (portlet,content repository,jsf ) in jdeveloper 10.1.3.4.
and created a DatacontrolRepository connection for conent server , so inside the data control pallette I get all the methods such as search, AdvancedSearch,getItems.
Now I am trying to drop the getItems() method return value from JCR data control as a Table inside my JSR 168 standard portlet which i created.
But I am not able to see any of the content in my portlet.
If I drag the same method getItems() on to my jspx page ( inside my ViewController) its working as expected.
Please guide me how can get the content on portlet.

Hi,
Thanks for your reply..but i already have this demo and it doesn't contain an example for a pie graph..if u know where i can find any example for a pie graph and how to pass data to it i would be so thankful
Thanks again.
Eyad Basheer

Refresh the object associated with a Row in a Data Control?

I am using EclipseLink & have an issue with multiple updates of the same Row. During an update, a new instance of the entity is returned by the update method. The instance bound to the Row is not updated with this new version and subsequent updates fail with an optimistic locking exception since the entityVersion hasn't been updated.
Question: Is it possible to refresh the instance associated with a data control Row? I can remove rows, create rows, but it is not apparent to me how to update a row. I am trying to avoid doing a full retrieve on the bound iterator.

Hi!
The issue here is, by my opinion, a gap between ADFm and EJB 3.0 in use-cases with large data sets. If you search this forum, you may find related thread by Pedja about problem of feasible "scrollable" af:table with large number of entities in EJB finder result list. Unfortunately, the ADFm "paged" fetching is in mismatch with EJB support for "paged" (or scrollable) results lists. The all results of EJB finder method are retrieved from data source, stored in memory (thus breaking the heap) and transferred to ADF datacontrol. Then, and only then, ADFm paged fetching and caching mechanisms are employed – but they are just cosmetics as the main data set is permanently stored in memory as List<?>. The workaround is, as Pedja discovered, to write completely proprietary TableCollectionModel which completely evades ADFm and is implemented by set of EJB Session methods for paged acces to datasource through TopLink and native database queries (enabling retrieval of particular range of rows instead a complete result set). Of course, this is very complex coding experience and I find it a not acceptable for efficient development of modern applications on ADF + EJB stack, especially as it brakes a technology independence promoted by EJB and EclipseLink and other standards-based technologies (as you have to use database-specific native query implementation for paged /scrollable access!).
What I want to say is that I have feeling that ADF support for EJB is not complete in full extend and that ADFm is still much better suited for BCs then for EJBs. I hope that this will be solved in future as this issue may pose a significant issue on application development in enterprise-level area where it is supposed that we are dealing with BROWSING also a large data sets.
Yes, I emphasize a BROWSING as I strongly oppose a dogmatic approach that SEARCHING is a solution for every use-case. From theory of information, the system SHOULD NOT limit the user in accessing ALL information (based on access rights, of course). So the idea that SEARCH forms should be used to bridge a architectural gap between a ADFm and EJB is not acceptable, as the search MAY limit the user in acquiring the information he (or she) is not able to describe in adequate manner based on search criteria offered by the developer. So, the developer may be responsible for misinformation of user, by limiting his access to information, jus for technology limitations of ADFm which forces a development of purely SEARCH-based functionalities.
I hope that development team would appreciate and consider this remarks, and invest effort in closing (not bridging!) the gap between ADFm and EJB.
Regards,
PaKo

What are the benefits of converting my custom class into Data Control?

Hi,
I have developed my own custom class which implements no of methods for execution of Business Logic. Now I have two ways to use the same -
*1. Create and instance of the same (wherever required) and call those methods.*
*2. Expose the class as Data Control.*
I want to understand which methods/technique is better and why?
Does creating that class as Data Control provides me better performance any other benefit.
Thanks in Advance,
Amit

Hi,
1. You use this if you don't want to use ADF bindings to access the business logic (e.g. to build input forms or table for it)
2. You use this when you want to work with ADF. Additional benefits you gain is that you can specify UI control hints on the generated metadata, apply validation rules that are consistently applied to all uses of the POJO class. In addition you don't need to handle class instantiation and dismissal yourself anymore as the ADF framework takes care of it.
The base line though is "no data control - no ADF binding"
Frank

Can you print all the tab control's contents and include the tabs?

We are trying to generate a report that includes the contents of a tab control (graphs, text). Using the Append Control Image to Report.vi, we are only able to print out the active tab and the tab is cut off of the image. How can we generate reports that include all the tab pages and their contents and include the labeling tabs?
Thanks in advance.
Jim

I do have a workaround for makinging the prints but it looks like some sort of cropped screensave that cuts off the tabs. In my sample I was printing out 3 of the tab controls and you can see there are three by the cut off tabs. Is there a setting to allow for more of the graph and its surroundings to be "captured"?
Attachments:
Document.pdf ‏53 KB
Document (2).pdf ‏51 KB
Document (3) (2).pdf ‏58 KB

SP2010 Designer workflow "Set Content Approval Status" does not work

Hello
I'm having a problem with a workflow for one of my clients.It is a SharePoint 2010 environment and I can only use SharePoint 2010 designer (no visual studio).
We have an approval workflow in place, which works great. After the document approval workflow has does its thing, a new workflow can be launged by specific users (they have writing rights and can approve content). The workflow is used to set the release
date of the document. This can only be determined after content approval.
However, when the release date is set, the document approval status is changed to concept. This is of course to be expected, as we changed to document metadata. That is why I wanted to add the action "Set content approval" to this workflow. I cannot
seem to get this action to work. Right now the workflow does the following:
check out the document (check out is obligatory in our library)
set the release date field to the released date parameter (defined when starting the workflow)
check in the document
set content approval to approved.
The release date gets set to the parameter value, but the document is not checked in and the content approval status is not set. SharePoint produces the following error message (translated from Dutch): "An error occured. Cannot edit the item, possibly
because one or more columns require another type of content. Unknown error."
Guided by other posts online I gathered that this might be because the actions checkin and set content approval occur to close together. I tried letting the workflow pause for the duration of 1 minute after checking in, but this pauses the workflow indefinitely.
I then tried 5 minutes (as this is the time standard set by SP2010 designer) but this also resulted in indefinite pausing.
Posts online lead me to believe that I'm not the only suffering from this problem, but as of yet, I haven't been able to find a solution that works for me. Hopefully someone can help me.

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that the "Set Content Approval Status" didn’t work in SharePoint 2010 Designer workflow.
I try to reproduce the issue and the result is the same as yours.
If I only check out and check in the item, the workflow works well.
However, once I set Content Approval Status after checking in the item, the workflow get error.
As a workaround, I recommend to use two workflow to achieve what you want.
First, create the first workflow, and allow the workflow to be manually started.
Then, create the second workflow, and
start the workflow automatically when an item is changed.
When you start the first workflow, the document will be set value of the release date. And then the second workflow will be started automatically to set the content approval status.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Release Status of PR

Dear All,
How to check a PR is fully released ?
Thanks in advance.

Go to ME53, Select the Line item, and click the Flag Icon,
You will have Pop up of Release strategy.
Check release code of "release to date" against the release codes "Final release" they should be same,
Check the Release ID : RFQ/Purchase order is allowed or it comes as Block for Processing.
You can also check the PR Release status through Report MB5A, with required criteria of the check boxes.
Regards
Vikrant

Sales Deal - release status

Hi,
I have a question about the Sales Deals in SAP.
When we create a sales deal and release this sales deal it is not possible to change this status.
Is it normal that a Deal Status cannot be changed once it has ben released?
Or is this a customizing setting?
Kind regards,
Debby

No, you can't change it via config.
However the default value for release status (when deal is created) is controlled via config, you can change it to start with A-Blocked, for example and then change it to released later, that's possible. The T code for Sales Deal config to change the default is VB(9.
However I guess you are more interested in the underlying condition records and not the 'deal' itself. If you want to change the status of condition records them separately, you can do so provided :
1) the condition record has release status in the key
2) the agreement has the release status released
Go through these documentation pieces:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/72/6e032d214411d29a0d0000e8a5bd28/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/a4/af9e78e69611d2ace10000e8a5bd28/frameset.htm
Hope this helps.

How system will capture the course completion status

Hi Gurus,
Module: OLM/iLearning
Question: Users have to manadatorily click on "Home" button to get the completion status captured on OLMS? Is it standard functionality? I couldn't find the details in the user manual. Please suggest. Thanks.
Regards,
Grandhi.

Couple points of clarification (at least in Oracle iLearning)
Completion/learner status is recorded when one of the four things below occur:
1. The learner navigates to another learning object within the course outline (if there is more than one object)
2. The learner clicks the home icon (or close, depending on player preference settings)
3. The content calls ExitAU (for AICC content), or LMSFinish (for SCORM 1.2/2004 content).. This is typically called when the learner moves away from the content by items 1 or 2 above but can also occur for example on the last page of the course, depending on when the content decides to finish communication with the LMS.
4. The learner closes the browser window. At this stage, assuming pop-up blockers are disabled, the LMS will open a small window for a couple seconds that will finish off the communication with the LMS before fully shutting down. This typically gives the content enough time to call the appropriate finish command listed in #3 above.
In Oracle iLearning, there are two main options for opening content in a new window, the first separates the main player window from the content and the second includes the content and player in a separate window.
1. On the content object properties page, the Open in New Window checkbox can be checked. This opens the player in the main browser window and pops up the content in a separate window.
2. On the offering properties page (select content object -> Offerings link, edit offering), the Open in New Window checkbox can be checked. This will open the player in a new browser window and the content within the player frameset in that new window. If the admin has also clicked the Open in New Window checkbox on the content object properties, a 2nd window will open (total of 3) with the content.
Scott
http://www.seertechsolutions.com

Changing the Site URL of a Sharepoint site changes the content type order

Description
Changing the Site URL of a Sharepoint site changes the content type order of all lists that
* contain folder content types
* and have a custom content type order
* where a folder content type is the first content type in order.
Reproducible behaviour
1. Create a Team Site in Sharepoint
2. Create a Task List "Test" on the Team Site
3. Go to List Settings
4. The Content Type order is by default
    a. Task
    b. Summary Task
5. Change the Content Type Order to
    a. Summary Task
    b. Task
6. Go To Site Settings "Title, description and icon"
7. Change the Site Url
8. Go To List "Test" List Settings
9. The Content Type order now is
    a. Task
    b. Summary Task
10. Select "Change New button order and default content type"
11. Here, the Content Type order still is
    a. Summary Task
    b. Task
Is this a bug? Has anyone noticed this behaviour before?
Kind Regards,
Joachim

Hi Joachim,
You are not missing something or doing something wrong. i Hope :). This behavior is reproductible.
The granularity of change is better by Powershell. But by the interface is most user-friendly.
Maybe that's the reason of this behavior.
Gilles Martinez
Twitter
Blog
Please mark as helpful/answer if this resolved your post

Include the Content Released status flag in default WC data control

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for