Incoming Payment Dist.Rule

I'm using SAP B1.9.0 PL 4 for SAP HANA,
when I create Incoming payment and input the Dist.Rule everything fine BUT those dist.Rule do not relate to Journal Entry so I have to open journal entry menu on every incoming payment then input the dist.rule,
I think this is strange why the dist.rule not automaticaly relate to journal entry ? Is it normal or Bugs ?
Thanks

Hi Ivan,
This is the defualt system fuction. Cost center and distribution rule is only for P&L Accounts not relate with balance sheet accounts. If you choose expense or revenue account (Indian localization) it will
automatically fill in the journal entry. Other wise you have to open JE and need to be fill for  other than P&L accounts.
Regards
Sridharan

Similar Messages

  • Distribution Rule in Incoming Payment of Invoice

    Hello Experts,
    I'm running SAP B1 8.81 PL05 and I have the following problem.
    I issue an A/R Invoice + Payment  and I have in the "Payment Means" a discount. The final result is an issue of two different journal entries - one for the invoice and another for the payment discount.
    The problem is that I want to have a Distribution Rule associated with the Incoming Payment discount and I can't find a way to associate it - the solution of associating a distribution rule to the account is not possible because the Distribution Rule changes according to the sales employee.
    Help would be very appreciated.

    Hi Thomas,
    From the SAP help, you can know what is the use of this rule.
    Defining Distribution Rules
    Use
    For cost accounting, this setting is mandatory.
    Use this procedure to define distribution rules to distribute amounts between different profit centers.
    Prerequisites
    You have defined profit centers.
    Note: If you delete a distribution rule for one profit center (100%) this does not automatically delete the profit center.
    You can also look up this key word to find more info. For examle, you can find SAP note 1236348 to see if it fits you.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Distribution rules in Incoming payment and Outgoing payment

    Hi,
    Did anyone know the purpose of having distribution rules in all the outstanding invoices in both Incoming and Outgoing payment.
    I try to attach the distribution rules to specific invoice and post incoming payment but it did not appear in the bank journal entry row.
    I also try to attach profit center in AR Invoice row but after posting and do Incoming payment, the distribution rules also never show for that particular invoice.
    Really wonder how the distribution rule works?
    Regards
    Thomas

    Hi Thomas,
    From the SAP help, you can know what is the use of this rule.
    Defining Distribution Rules
    Use
    For cost accounting, this setting is mandatory.
    Use this procedure to define distribution rules to distribute amounts between different profit centers.
    Prerequisites
    You have defined profit centers.
    Note: If you delete a distribution rule for one profit center (100%) this does not automatically delete the profit center.
    You can also look up this key word to find more info. For examle, you can find SAP note 1236348 to see if it fits you.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Incoming payment by F-28: Reason code error while posting

    Hello everyone,
    I want to post Incoing Payment using F-28 net of TDS. I want the separate GL account to be picked up automatically for the difference when I enter the Reason Code 003.
    I did the following customization for the same.
    1. Financial Accounting> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable> Business Transactions>Incoimng Payments> Incoming Payments Global Settings>Overpayment/Underpayment> Define Reason Codes:- Here I selected the Indicator 'C' for reason code 003 which is for "Indicator: Charge off difference via separate account". The reason code 003 is for TDS Netted
    2. Below the Define Reason Code node, I selected the node 'Define Accounts for Payment Differences' . Selected the key ' Rules' and selected the checkbox 'Reason Code'. Then clicked on 'Accounts' and enetered the desired GL account against the reason code '003'.
    After doing the above customization I posted the Incoming payment using T code F-28. I entered the difference in the field 'Difference Posting'. Then entered reason code '003' which is for 'TDS netted' in the field 'Reason Code'. Now, I am getting the follwoing error.
    Reason codes with automatic charge-off are not permitted here
    Message no. F5605
    Diagnosis
    The reason code entered is designed to ensure that the payment difference amount is posted to an account specially set up for this purpose.  Postings of this nature usually require additional specifications (e.g. tax code, business area). If the difference stems from a single open item, the necessary specifications can be taken from that item. In the case that led to this error message, however, the difference does not stem soley from one item, which means that this method cannot be used.
    System Response
    The reason code entered is not accepted.
    Procedure
    You can either select a different reason code, which would create a new open item for the customer or vendor OR write off the difference using the function Charge off diff.. This function either takes you into a pre-configured account assignment model or into the document overview. From here you can enter the required difference postings.
    How can I proceed ahead?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Pradnya

    Hi Saulo,
    Thanks for ur reply.
    I had alreay done the config in OBXL and OBBE. Only thing I wanted to know is while posting Incoming Payment by F-28, how to use this reason code.
    Ur reply was a gr8 help for me.
    Regards,
    Pradnya

  • F-28 Incoming payment BSEG-XREF1/2 & BSEG-XREF3 grayed out on clearing line

    We apply payment Using SAP standard transaction code F-28 - post  incoming payment.
    Business requirement is to capture Reference Key 1/2 & Reference Key 3 are on  cleared as well as partial line items. Populating these fields will help reconciliation.
    I have opened up these fields for data entry via
    SPRO -  Financial Accounting -  Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable
    -  Business Transactions - Incoming Payments - Make and Check Document
    Settings-  Define Posting Keys.
    These fields are available only for partial or payment on account. For clearing lines its grayed out completely.
    Appreciate your help.
    Thanks
    Uday Malghan

    I would like to share workaround. As mentioned in my prior mail these fields were open for entry, however SAP prevents any changes. Opening up OSS message with SAP was not helpful. To get around I decided to create substitution rule to populate these fields. It works fine. I thought sharing with this forum. Thanks for for your time.

  • MT940 EBS upload for Incoming payment

    HI,
    We are implementing the MT940 format EBS upload for incoming payments. For incoming payment (customer) not executing the F110. so by EBS upload following posting should be happen;
    Debit - Bank account
    Credit - customer subledger account
    The note to payee information in 86 field of bank file will contain the IBAN number and invoice number. and the posting / clearing should happen as follows;
    -  post document by debiting bank account and credit customers' account based on IBAN. ( only posting ,not clearing)
    - clear the incoming payment based on invoice's document 
    - If some npayment record in bank statement not have invoice number  then clear the amount in FIFO principle based on IBAN
    Could you share what the steps i need to take care in "Assign External Transaction Types to Posting Rules" step and
    Do we need to develop user exit to take care the incoming payment clearing as described above.
    Where do we need to assign the user exit? how will system call user exit when we execute FF.5
    Regards,
    Swetha

    You account digits logic is little unclear. Thats why it is always important have the proper logic while formulating the accounts.
    For example
    If the main account is
    120300 (ending with 0)
    120301 (Cheque Payable Sub account 1)
    120302 (Cheque Receivable Sub Account 2)
    Now you can mask
    +++++1 for Cheque Payments
    +++++2 for Cheque Receipts
    But, you said, you
    main account 13102211 and incoming subaccount was 13106271
    If I understand correctly
    the masking should be ++++6271
    Otherwise
    +++67+

  • Error when trying to print incoming payment of type "account"

    Hello all:
    One of our customers has just upgraded from 2007 to 8.8 SP00 PL12. Now, whenever they try to print a PLD of an incoming payment which is of type "Account", the following error appears:
    No matching records found  'Payment Terms' (OCTG) (ODBC -2028)  [Message 131-183]
    I have already created an empty layout containing only a sample text field, in order to rule out any unsupported database field in the PLD, but I still have the same error.
    The incoming payments of type "customer" work fine, it is only the account type payments that do not print, and that after the upgrade to 8.8.
    Any ideas? I guess I will have to open a support ticket on this...
    Thanks,
    Joerg.

    As an additional info, I tried, as a workaround, to use a Crystal Report
    layout for the incoming payments, but I do have the same effect as with
    the PLD layouts. Customer receipts print fine, yet account receipts do
    come up with the error mentioned.
    Am I the only one with this error or is there anybody else?
    Thanks,
    Joerg.

  • SBO_TransactionNotification and Incoming Payments

    Hello,
    I need to know the @object_type for Incoming Payments. What I need is to Have SBO_TransactionNotification grab all an incoming payments.  I need to check if the payment was cash, check or credit and apply certain rules depending of the method of payment. 
    I already try using object types 24(oIncomingPayments) and 140 (Payment Drafts) but it doesn't work, looks like I'm using the incorrect object type.
    Im using SAP 2007.
    If anyone can help me I will appreciate.
    Thank you very much
    Patricia Paredes

    Hi Patricia,
    Object Type '24' is correct (this is a string value and not an integer as the @object_type parameter is nvarchar). If I add an Incoming Payment in SBO 2007A (patch 15) while running SQL Profiler then I can see the following command:
    EXECUTE SBO_SP_TransactionNotification N'24',N'A',1,N'DocEntry',N'5'
    So, as far as I can see, the notification for a new incoming payment is firing ok. I can also see a number of others (for the GL journal and the reconciliation transaction). I'd recommend you check with SQL Profiler and see if you get different results.
    Kind Regards,
    Owen

  • Incomeing payment with discount

    Hi all,
    I was doing incomeing payment with discount allowed , here payment terms and discount amt also is correct, but the system did't  show in the customer and discound allowed line time , the document did't not saved, the system shows one error.
    error :Rules for posting key 15 and out 200200 set incorrectly for SKFBT field
    pls can anybody help me
    Regards
    sri

    Hi sri,
    T.code -OB41
    There is a conflict in the field status group set for the GL Account and the posting key. For example at one place the field status is set as mandatory field and at the other it is supressed. Check the field status and ensure that both are same.
    From the customer gl Master check what is the field status assigned and check the field status of the different fields. Sametime also check the field status for the posting key 50. This is in configuration. Once, this is set right there will not be any problem in posting the transactions.
    Go to OB41 T. Code there double click on 50 Posting key then click on Maintain field status there you have to change all optional fields. I think your problem go off.
    Regards
    Surya

  • Cross company posting for incoming payments on manual bank statement

    Hello folks, could you please help Toine on this issue?
    "We want to post incoming payments in the manual bank statement which  
    have to be cleared with open items of a debtor in another company code.
    What customising settings do we need for such a posting? We are not   
    able to make the posting in our system."
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    this answer does not help very much, the SAP message also told the same. In customising for transaction 1000, variant 0001 type 04000 is assigned (standard SAP delivery). Therefor I think that the postingrules for the manual bank statement are not correct.
    We use two posting rules for a payment:
    The first in posting area 1: 40 / bank account number debit; 50 / gl account credit posting type 1
    Second in posting area 2: 40 / gl account, no credit postingtype 8
    For a payment of a debtor in the same company code this works correct. But if the payment is destined for a different company code (the field for the different company code is in the variant for FF67), this doesn't work. Should we use other posting rules and if so which ones??
    Best regards,
    Toine

  • EBS: incoming payments

    Hi All,
    We are implementing EBS functionality, and the file is in MT940
    For incoming payments, the payment file will have either invoice reference or IBAN reference. So based on invoice reference or IBAN reference have to clear the customer.
    The posting will be,
    Debit Bank Account
    Credit Customer based on customers IBAN
    I hope can use the algorithm 21 to search invoice reference, but what is the algorithm to search IBAN reference?
    Thank you,
    Shwetha

    Yes. You can map incoming payments in the EBS. There is no restriction. You need to decide how to set the posting rules in the configuration. You have 2 options 1. Posting where you put in the config which account is to be debited and which is to be credited when a particular external code appears in your bank statement. In this case you are just posting the entry and not clearing. 2nd option is that you want to clear the incoming payemnt like payment from your customer straight to your bank account. In this case you need to ask your bank to either send the document number and customer details in the bank file so that you can search it in SAP for clearing.
    Hope this helps.

  • F-28 error customer  incoming payment

    Hi Experts
    I am getting error when i ma trying to post customer incoming payments...
    Bank account is petty cash account
    Error : Balancing field profit center in line item 001 is not filled
    Kindly reply , thanks in advance
    Alex

    Hi,
    Please note that the error is expected when using Profit Center as a mandatory field ( in your splitting characteristics),
    but however no value can be derived when posting the incoming payment.
    If you want the field profit center to be a mandatory field, you need to make sure that this will be derived by your splitting rules.
    Please review the following two consulting notes in relation to the document splitting functionality:
    1085921 Document split
    891144  New GL/Document splitting: Risks w/ subsequent
    regards
    Waman

  • Bank Reconcilliation of Incoming payments F-28

    Hi,
    I am working on Electronic Bank Statement. I have set up the posting rule to clear incoming payments from Customers.  Basically since we do not receive Customer Invoice No. in our Bank statement file (MT940 file being used), we post Incoming payment entries in F-28 and maintain payment transaction Number (16 digit No. for RTGS and NEFT) as Reference Number in field XBLNR. And when I upload the file, I am able to clear all those payments which I have made through F-29  ie Down payments whereas I am not able to clear incoming payments posted through F-28.
    Any idea why the system behaves this way though both F-28 and F-29 have same document type. Any help on this would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks in Advance,
    NK.

    Hai Bishnu,
    Check it once your doc types in OBA7 t.code here u can maintain No. Ranges for 2006 year.
    If your already maintain the No ranges, try to change the no ranges for the doc type instead of 14 you can change like 99
    Regards
    Madhu I

  • Background Journal entry for Incoming payment

    Dear Experts,
    Would you please help me in how to get the journal entry for an incoming payment entered as "payment on account".
    The relationship map does not show this, but I can see the credit entry for the customer is passed.
    same happens for incoming payment made for specific AR invoices.
    SAP Doc says...
    Result
    An incoming payment document is created.
    A journal entry that credits the customer and the tax accounts (if tax is involved), and debits the receivable account, is created.
    The journal entries of the incoming payments and the paid invoices are reconciled.
    The paid invoices are closed; they no longer appear in the Open Items list and in the Incoming Paymentswindow as documents for payment.
    So how to check the journal entries for incoming payments.
    Regards
    Message was edited by: Suman Roy

    Hi,
    To see journal entry, drill down arrow at transaction no of incoming payment window.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nagarajan

  • Clearing issue Incoming payment due to Cash discount ( customers)

    Hello,
    During processing automatic incoming payments the system don't clear the customer open item in case the customer has taken a cash discount.
    The clearing should be done automatically in the posting area 2 but now the the user needs to do manual interventions in the FEBAN in order to clear the customer
    We checked the payment terms and verified the discount taken by the customer and they are ok
    After investigation we guess that the original SD invoice don't send the Discount amount and Discount base amount to FI, because  we saw that those fields are empty in the FI document (RV),
    Also in Billing the Cash discount base field in empty...
    When i tried to create a manual customer invoice those fields are well filled in and the system clears the customer open item perfectly !
    Any one an idea how to fix it ?

    Hello,
    Thanks for your feedback but the issue is not solved.
    Is there difference in clearing behaviour in case the open item posting is orginated from  a SD invoice ( Billing) because as stated before, when I make a FI sales invoice (FB60) the system perfectly accepts the cash discount and post and clears in postingarea 2
    Also when I consult the open item position (FBL5N) the cash discount amount field is empty which is not the case when I post an FB60 invoice
    Summarized
    We are usiing the automatic bank statement program ( FEBC), during posting the system post perfectly posting area 1 (FEBP) but fails the post postingarea 2 ( the system makes a payment advice) the message the system generates ' Difference to large for clearing F5263'
    Many thanks for help

Maybe you are looking for

  • Small Office Network Setup

    Hello everyone! Pretty soon I will be starting a graphic design, video, and music production company with my brother and friend. All 3 sections will be using apple macs. I was just wondering if any of you can offer suggestions as far as networking ha

  • Quicktime installation failed -3

    Not really helpful - now itunes doesn't work AGAIN. Every update is another break. Ok, how do I fix this???? Now itunes will not work because it needs Quicktime 7.03 or later. Ahhhhh!!

  • TS3989 Photo Stream won't upload to iOS devices

    My Photo Stream has 999 photo's currently showing in iPhoto, but my iOS devices stop uploading at 195 photos.  Is there a way to refresh the uploading process without having to turn off/on Photo Stream in the settings?

  • Some apps won't launch

    Mail, Safari, iTunes, iPhoto, and iWeb won't launch. (Maybe a few others, so far all are apple apps.) Before this happened I did the updates for iTunes and Safari that came out on 4/2/2010. I restarted and now they won't work. Any ideas? Please Help!

  • Can't delete  opmn component wanring

    dear gurus, Seems my biee server is in an unstable status for below warning was shown: WARNING: Element Type: PROCESS, Element Id: instance1:coreapplication_obips2, Operation Result: OPMN_PROCESS_DELETE_FAILED, Detail Message: Unable to delete opmn c