Inconsistent entries between driver_aliases and path_to_inst

Hi,
I see the following in my solaris intel box.
bash-2.03# grep iprb /etc/driver_aliases
iprb "pci8086,1229"
iprb "pci8086,1029"
bash-2.03# grep iprb /etc/path_to_inst
"/pci@0,0/pci8086,100c@6" 0 "iprb"
bash-2.03#
100c is the inte pro/1000 gig NIC and 1229/1029 are pro/100 fast ethernet NICs.
The following are my questions:
1. How can iprb bind to 100c when the aliases do not exist for it?
2. The iprb is actually binding to the pro/100 NIC(I know this since I can ssh into the box etc, pro1000 card has no connectivity). Does this mean the what ever is in path_to_inst cannot be trusted?
3. After solaris boots, how do we know what NIC is bound to which driver(assuming a case when we different NICs managed by different drivers.)
4. What the contention resolution algorithm for driver binding. In other words what does solaris do when more then one driver says it can manage a particular device.
any help is greatly appreciated,
Vijay
ps: BTW, everytime I reboot I do a reconfiguration reboot so that path_to_inst gets updated.

Here's the long and short of it...
entries like this in the lpfc.conf file:
fcp-bind-WWPN="50060482ccb4bbbb:lpfc3t6",
"50060482ccb4bccc:lpfc5t7",
"50060482ccb4bddd:lpfc8t9",
"5006048accb4beee:lpfc9t10",
"5006048accb4bfff:lpfc10t25",
"5006048accb4bggg:lpfc11t24",
"50060482ccb4bhhh:lpfc15t8",
"50060482ccb4biii:lpfc16t12",
"5006048accb4bjjj:lpfc20t38",
"5006048accb4bkkk:lpfc21t13",
"5006048accb4bmmm:lpfc22t40",
[snip]
"5006048accb4bnnn:lpfc25t23";
and these in the sd.conf file:
# Start of SD.CONF Entries for DMX
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=6 lun=16;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=6 lun=17;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=6 lun=18;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=6 lun=19;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=6 lun=20;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=7 lun=68;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=7 lun=69;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=7 lun=70;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=7 lun=71;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=7 lun=72;
[snip]
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=9 lun=133;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=9 lun=134;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=9 lun=135;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=9 lun=136;
will create /etc/path_to_inst entries for each LUN, for each TARGET, for each LPFC instance. Normally it's not a problem. In my case I have 44 Emulex LPFC instances, a TON of targets (an average of 1.5 per FA<->HBA mappings) and a TON of LUNS.
# of HBA(lpfc) x total # of Lun ((sum of lpfc lun/target) + sum of scsi lun/target)) ~ 32,767
Anyway, by using the hba="..." format in the sd.conf file, we were able to eliminate all of the extra /etc/path_to_inst entries created. This reduced the "sd" entries in /etc/path_to_inst to just over 3,000. Example
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=33 hba="lpfc17" lun=123;
If the instance numbers on my HBA's ever change, I'm in trouble. Of course, this could have been avoided with the latest lpfc driver, or by using leadvill because they don't require entries in sd.conf.
Thanks to all who assisted.

Similar Messages

Share Configuration Manager Entries between WebDynpro and EJB

Hi there,
I have an annoying problem: I would like to have a WebDynpro as full-blown configuration interface for my EJBs. As steted in the docu, it is not possible to share configurations between applications.
With EJB and Web Modules I would just place them in the same Enterprise Application. But I cannot as WebDynpro projects to enterprise applications (as far as I know).
Does anyone have a clou about I could manage this issue?
Thanks!
helge

Hi Maksim,
at the link you've provided it is described how to use the Configuration Manager within an EJB Module.
My Problem is that I want to use it from an WebDynpro Application. But there I don't have a META-INF\application-j2ee-engine.xm to configure the dependency.
This itself is not a problem since you can also access the Configuration Manager via JNDI.
My problem now is that the EJB Module (more precise the enterprise application where the EJB Module is included) needs to share the configurtion with the Dynpro. But vi JNDI you only get the ApplicationConfigurationManager - which is application specific.
So the question is how I could share the configuration between WebDynpro and EjbModule...
Regards,
helge

Inconsistant Security Between EAS and App Man

Has anybody seen differences between what App manager and EAS show for security information. In App Mangager I have Supervisor rights explicitly, not through a group. EAS lists me as a user with no rights to anything when I look at the same server. I also found that if I click on some Groups and select the user tab there are no users in the list to add to the group. I have 500 users under the user list. I also don't get any groups to add when I try to add a user to a group by editing the properties of the user.

What version of EAS are you o get then?I am currently using 6.5.0 and 6.5.1 and I do not have any issues like you descibe.You described the user having Supervisor access, are you loging into EAS as that person and getting no lists of users etc. If you login as the Essbase Admin, (id from the original instal) do you get the same response?Regards,Corey BidmeadClarity Systems

Inconsistent results between SDO_RELATE and SDO_GEOM.RELATE

Maybe its the Friday syndrome, but I'm getting some results that I can't get my head around...
Let say I have a table with a single line geometry...
CREATE TABLE BUFFER_TEST (
     WHAT VARCHAR2(100),
     GEOMETRY SDO_GEOMETRY);
INSERT INTO user_sdo_geom_metadata VALUES ('BUFFER_TEST','GEOMETRY',
MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ARRAY(
     MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X',400000,750000,0.0005),
     MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y',500000,1000000,0.0005)),
262152);
CREATE INDEX BUFFER_TEST_IDX ON BUFFER_TEST (GEOMETRY) INDEXTYPE IS MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX;
INSERT INTO BUFFER_TEST (what, geometry)
VALUES ('line',
SDO_GEOMETRY(2002, 262152, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 2, 1),
SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(713353.165, 736165.812, 713353.449, 736165.402, 713353.849,
736164.203, 713353.85, 736162.252, 713353.087, 736149.092)));
COMMIT;Now I want to buffer this line and check if the line is inside the buffer - the actual business need is to see if other lines are in the buffer, but we'll keep it simple for now...
So in the snippet below, I'm buffering the line by 50cm and then using SDO_INSIDE to see if the line is inside the buffer - it isn't.
Then if I use SDO_GEOM.RELATE to determine the relationship, it says INSIDE, which is correct.
Then if I increase the buffer size to 1m, then SDO_INSIDE and SDO_GEOM.RELATE both return the correct result.
SQL> DECLARE
2   l_inside NUMBER;
3   l_small_buffer SDO_GEOMETRY;
4   l_determine VARCHAR2(100);
5   l_buffer_size NUMBER := 0.5;
6 BEGIN
7
8     SELECT SDO_GEOM.SDO_BUFFER(b.geometry, usgm.diminfo, l_buffer_size)
9     INTO      l_small_buffer
10     FROM    user_sdo_geom_metadata usgm, BUFFER_TEST b
11     WHERE usgm.table_name = 'BUFFER_TEST'
12     AND      usgm.column_name = 'GEOMETRY'
13     AND      b.what = 'line';
14
15     SELECT COUNT(*)
16     INTO    l_inside
17     FROM   BUFFER_TEST
18     WHERE SDO_INSIDE(geometry, l_small_buffer) = 'TRUE'
19     AND     what = 'line';
20
21     SELECT SDO_GEOM.RELATE(geometry, 'determine', l_small_buffer, 0.0005) relationship
22     INTO l_determine
23     FROM BUFFER_TEST
24     WHERE what = 'line';
25
26     DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('l_inside: ' || l_inside || ' relationship ' || l_determine);
27
28 END;
29 /
l_inside: 0 relationship INSIDEAny help would be much appreciated... I'm starting to pull my hair out on this.
This is on Oracle 10.2.0.3

I can reproduce this on 11.1.0.6 on Windows 32bit.
Would you recommend I open a support case on this? Do you think it would be possible to backport a fix to 10.2.0.4?

Print Problem: inconsistent density between sizes and Lightroom/Photoshop

In the past I printed using only Photoshop. I recently made a batch of prints from Lightroom, using the same paper, printer profile, rendering intent, and noticed that the output does not match the output from Photoshop. The Lightroom prints have noticeably more density. I then noticed that large Lightroom prints, for example 16 x 24, have noticeably more density than smaller size Lightroom 6 inch x 9 inch prints. I find no difference in print density when printing from Photoshop regardless of the print size. I can not determine why I am experiencing these variations in print output.
All prints are made using an Epson 7900 on Museo Portfolio Rag, same ICC profiles, same exact setup in the Epson printer driver (off no color adjustment), PS: PS manage color and same icc profile specified in both Lightroom and Photoshop. The computer is a Windows 7 machine.
Has any one else experienced these problems? My first thought is that this is some sort of bug in Lightroom's color management. But if that was true, then it seems like a lot of people would be having this problem. I have been using a color managed workflow for a number of years and have gotten very satisfactory results. My prints are a close match to the soft proof in Photoshop. Since printing from Lightroom the prints do not match prints made from Photoshop, plus the prints made by Lightroom vary in density depending on the size. Bizarre.
Please help

Solved. Somehow the custom media setting for the Museo Portfolio Rag paper was lost when I set up the LR template. The custom media setting reduced the color density by -20 in the Epson Printer driver. With out this setting the color density was at the default zero and the density was greater.
This brings up another question that I will have to explore. I arrived at the -20 color density setting when testing various Epson Driver media settings for the 7900 prior to profiling this paper after Epson replaced the nozzle heads on my 7900 printer. I found at the default zero color density I encountered banding. Prior to the replacement of the nozzle heads the default zero color density worked fine and there was no banding. Interestingly, on the 16 x 32 print that mistakenly used the zero color density setting there was no banding. Now I want to go back and redo my media tests. Is it possible that the new print heads needed a breaking in period and that is why I encountered banding on both the Museo Portfolio Rag and the Epson mat paper?

Inconsistent behavior between lift and extract

why does lift obey which tracks are enabled and extract works on every layer regardless of whether it is enabled or not (very annoying)

really, nobody else finds this annoying. I really cant figure out what the purpose is of enabling/disabling tracks in the timeline as it seems to have absolutely no effect most of the time. Every once in a while enabling a track of the timeline does what it does in every other NLE I have ever used (either enables or disables the track for editing), however most of the time the state of selection has absoliutely no effect other than making the interface LOOK like other editing packages

Inconsistency between tbtco and tbtcs

Hello guys,
we have a big problem after our HWU upgrade.
We have copied the content of tbtco into a new table tbtco_copy before the upgrade to save all the job entries.
After this we have deleted the contant of tbtco. So we had no scheduled jobs for the HWU
After the HWU we have copied back the content of tbtco_copy into tbtco.
But now we have a inconsistency between tbtco and tbtcs. This means that all planed and released jobs are not starting (delay goes up).
How we can start this jobs << Removed >>
Br
Christian
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Apr 19, 2009 4:23 PM

USer TR: SM65

What is the diffrence between map and map.entry in core java

what is the diffrence between map and map.entry in core java . where it will be use ful. any one give one example plz.

A Map contains Map.Entry's
e.g.
        Map map = new LinkedHashMap(8);
        map.put(new Integer(1), "one");
        map.put(new Integer(2), "two");
        final Iterator iterator = map.entrySet().iterator();
        while (iterator.hasNext()) {
            Map.Entry entry = (Map.Entry) iterator.next();
            System.out.println("key=" + entry.getKey() + ", value=" + entry.getValue());
        }

Inconsistency between ATP and ASCP

Thanks for looking at this message. Bit lengthy but will be interesting :-)
In our implementation we use ATP based on planning output and its a constrained ASCP plan (ECC) .
Assuming that sale sorders are available in the system and they have been entered say last month/ or even few months before with request date as the sale order entry date . We did nt have onhand at the time due to which the promise dates have been Sep-09.
Assume that we have made a receipt from supplier/or there is PO in receiving (considered as available date of today by ATP) . In this situation in case a new sales order is entered today with request date of today provided the onhand or expected receipt today is more than sales order qty , the promise date upon sales order entry is today. We do OM loopback and send back sch ship date from ASCP which gives correct dates (Sep or Oct based on lead times). But issue is in the promise date .
Issue 1: customer is questioning while there are so many existing sales orders which are already in arrears and their request dates are all in past months why does a new sales order get a promise date of today?
When ASCP runs overnight it plans based on request date and the onhand/exp receipt is pegged to earliest sales order and not the new one put in today(which is fine and as expected) , but due to the mismatch between ATP and ASCP always there is going to be mismatch in meeting promise date and Sales performance measures go for a task.
Also there all the customers are sent Order Acknowledgement (emailed upon booking order) based on the wrong promise date which causes lot of issues in explaining to each customer.
Issue 2:lets say onhand is 2 and there are 2 sales order lines one for qty 8 (req date 21-jul) and other for qty 2 (req date 23-jul) . I schedule order line 8 (req date 21-jul) first then ATP promises line after LT (say Sep-09) and the qty 2 line is promised today but when ASCP is scheduling it has ability to see request date due to which it can peg 2 onhand to earlier request date and then wait for new supply till Sep-09. The one with later request date will show ship date in Sep-09.
Have attached the screen shots explaining the issue 1 and 2
Best regards
Vinay

Hi Vinayak
Both of your observations are correct. As I managed ATP development for several years, let me help explain these things to you:
1. For 1st issue, where a new incoming sales order can get better date than earlier promised sales order, please understand that ATP is based on supply/demand picture at a point in time when SO was originally processed. If supply/demand picture has changed significantly, you need to use a tool like Oracle Backlog WB to manage and re-process currently scheduled SO to re-assess where they should be promised. Once Sales Order is promised, ATP uses schedule ship date to see when material is needed and uses a supply closes to ship date (JIT). If earlier supplies are available, they're up for grabs by new SO.
Thus, the behavior is working as designed and you need to develop your business process to ensure that backlog management is practiced on a regular basis to avoid such issues.
2. For 2nd issue where you see that ATP isn't using supply to satisfy smaller qty sales order, please understand that ATP is "First-come-First-Serve" and it is working on 1 specific order at a time. When initial order of qty=8 came in, it had no way to know what lies in future or if another SO with qty=2 will come later. Compare this with ASCP which is working a complete set of supplies and demands and can analyze this picture in totality.
I'm sure you'll like your ATP request to come back in few seconds (or may be a min or so) and not take a few hours while you enjoy the hourglass on your screen. No surprise that ASCP plan run takes few hours since it needs to go thru such hoops and try to optimize across these ideas while ATP is a quick answer as what can be done for this in-coming demand considering everything else in the system is frozen.
Please note ATP and ASCP plan serve very different purpose and business process needs to be enahnced to take advantage of best of both these tools.
Please feel free to contact me directly for any further issues in this respect.
Regards
Navneet Goel
[email protected]

Data Inconsistency for 0EMPLOYEE between ECC and BI

Hi,
We do a full load to 0EMPLOYEE using 0EMPLOYEE_ATTR from ECC. There were records deleted for lot of employees (some action types) in ECC. This has caused data inconsistency for 0EMPLOYEE master data (time-dependent) between ECC and BI. In BI we have more records for these employees (Additional records have time-dependent range that were deleted from ECC but still exist in BI). These employee records are already being used in lot of InfoProviders. Is there an efficient way to fix this issue? One of the solution is to delete data from all InfoProviders and then delete from Master data for 0EMPLOYEE, but the deletion of employee records can happen quite often, so we don't want to take this route. Also, I tried to re-organize master data attributes for 0EMPLOYEE through process chain, but that didn't work either.
Message was edited by:
Ripel Desai

Hi Ripel,
I share your pain. This is one of the real pains of Time-Dependant master data in BW. I have been in your exact position and the only way round the issue for me was to clear out all the cubes that used 0EMPLOYEE and then delete and re-load 0EMPLOYEE data.
I know this responce doesn't help you but at least you are not alone.
Regards,
Pete
http://www.teklink.co.uk

Track Missing Entries between Bank Main A/c and Clearing A/cs

hi,
Is there any easy way to track the missing entris between Bank Main a/c and Clearing Accouns. Is there any tocode or something.
Please advice.
Satish

Hi Chandra,
Thats right. You would anyways do a bank recon at which point these are moved into the bank main account.
Caio
Raghu

What is difference between modify and update i am using

hi
what is difference between mofify and update
my requiremen is to have three condition checkec while mofifying or updating from a internal table
the three fields are
cus no
status
date these all are primary key in the database table
so which sould i use modify or update
there might be entry already existing in database table or new entry to be created if already existin it should check on the primary keys and updatat if not it should add a record
pls suggest whihc to use and how to implement the check on teh threee primary key
like if modify ztable from table it_test
now where condition ? can be used or not with modify? and if yes how
if not should i use update will update create a new entry if no entry is there and please give syntex
regards
Arora

Hi Nishant Arora,
Modify: It works in performing two actions.
They are: Insert + Update.
For Example If a record that is exited in database, so you are modifying that record, it updates that particular record.
Similarly, If the is not existed in the database, you are modifying it, it inserts a new record.
Update: Update means just it updates the status, I mean it only updates the record. It doesn't inserts any new record if that particular record is not present in the database.
These are the cases you need to write these statements.
Syntaxes: :
Go through this links please.,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/e7/968aa8b2384dd9835f91e7f8470064/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/fc/eb35eb358411d1829f0000e829fbfe/content.htm
Reward points if useful
Cheers,
Swamy Kunche
Edited by: Swamy Kunche on Jun 11, 2008 2:41 PM

Connection between O and BP is missing

Hi,
When i check inconsistency for a user, i am getting " Connection between "O" and "BP" is missing. When i check the Org.unit in PPOSA_BBP, i could see no BP exists for that Org.unit where user is assigned. I have replicated the org.unit from HR system but yet the BP hasnt been generated. Can you please share your idea on this.
Regards,
Prasath J

Hi Prasath,
This might be because you need to assign the user to a Purchasing Organisation or a Purchasing Group. If the user do not have BP created then you can do this by using tcode USERS_GEN.
Go to USERS_GEN and follow below steps :
1. Select Create User From Existing SU01 user
2. Enter the org id of the POrg or Pgroup under which you want to assign the user
3. Select country and execute
4. In next window one popup will occur, select Area Of User
5. In next popup enter the user id
6. Next select the user and click Ok.
7. This will create a BP and CP for the user and assigns the BP to the Org id of the POrg or Pgroup.
8. Now check the consistency of the user it will show all green.
It might give you error like eMail id for BP XXXXX is missing if the SU01 profile of the user does not contain any user id but it is not critical.
You can open the BP in BP tcode and enter the email id of the user.
Let us know if it solves your issue.
Regards,
Mayur

ABST2 - Differences between Assets and G/L accts

Hi Experts
We are working on ECC 6.0 and INR is our local currency.
At the end of FY 2007 by mistake direct postings were made to Dep Fund Account which is a Recon a/c and FY 2007 was closed
And because of which FI-GL and FI-AA doesnt match by INR 37353.71 (amt posted in above doc) as shown in ABST2
I've referred SAP notes 104567 & 69225 and found the note 69225 relevant to follow as the difference has not resulted in the current or open years.
So we have passed direct entry which is exactly the reversal of entry posted above using ABF1 (INR -37353.71)
After posting the 2nd document, in ABST2 another line has appeared of INR -37353.71. Although the sum for my recon GL is now zero.
The output of ABST2 is as below now -
Sc Acct no.   BusA Year SG 1st local difference LCurr Doc.no.    Period
AS 31100                2009               37,353.71-        INR     W004
AS 31100                2009               37,353.71         INR     W004       999
When I come out of ABST2 , addition to 1st, error no 2 is also coming which I thought would disappear.
1.Differences between assets and G/L accts in the balance carried forward
     Message no. MQ555
2.Differences between assets and G/L accounts at the key date
     Message no. MQ557
Is still something else needs to be done?
Or can I move ahead as the summation of the difference is now zero?
Please suggest.
Kapil

We referred to SAP and they suggeted that the tagging of W004 in both the lines means that now there is no error even system prompts it as error.
So we continued with the transactions and after closing the FY 2009, today when we run ABST2, we dont get any error messages as there is no difference left between Assets & GL.

Display alternates between dark and bright

I have several issues but I suspect somehow they are all related as they all began about the same time, within about an hour of each other, which was maybe a week ago.
Periodically, my display slowly cycles between dark and bright. Sometimes the display will suddenly go to sleep on it's own, usually after a period of about 20 seconds of me not doing something and when I wake it up the display is quite dim. Other times the computer goes to sleep (not just the display) requiring me to log back on. I use password for startup. I open the display settings after log-on and the brightness slider has somehow moved way over to the dark end (left). I slide it up to where I like it and soon it does it again all by itself again after a very short period of inactivity. I have noticed that if I leave the brightness control alone (dim) without readjusting it it seems to take longer for the other issues to develop. I would normally place the brightness slider just under half way up. My sleep time settings are currently: computer - 1 hr, display 15 min. That is plugged in which is pretty much the only way I ever seem to use it ... plugged in.
Another issue is an occaisional rapid beeping. It's the same low beep that you hear when you try to do something stupid and the computer is telling you you've made an error. The difference is this is a long, unending string of rapid beeps; I'd estimate maybe 15 - 20 beeps per second. The sound does not stop. I have to mute the speakers to shut it up. I have not yet been able to determine a recognizable pattern of common variables for when this happens. The other day when the computer went to sleep by itself and I woke it and tried to input my password and I saw that the input bar was filled with black balls as if it was remembering my password which I did not like but when I hit enter the logon dilaog box shook, the entry field emptied and refilled on it's own. I held the backspace key for several seconds and nothing seemed to happen. I used shift/command/arrow to highlight the entire string and deleted it but as soon as the characters were deleted I saw the input line quickly fill back up again one ball at a time at roughly the same rate as the beeps. Then it occured to me that the beeps were similar to those you would hear if you held a key down and filled an entire entry field with a hundred of a particular character and was still holding down the key long after the field was full. My first thought was that a key was stuck down. Not so. Each and every key is free to move and functions normally.
Last night I closed the lid to put the computer to put it sleep before I went to bed. About 3 hours later I was awakened by the sound of the rapid beeping. I got out of bed and went to the computer and opened the lid to find the same input line black balls issue but this time it was accompanied by the beeping and the display was also cycling between bright and dim. As it was the middle of the night I killed the machine by holding down the power button and forcing a shutdown. This evening I decided to do the upgrade from 10.9.1 to 10.9.2 hoping that might help but it did not. I have not heard the beeping since the upgrade but the display is still cycling, which was the first thing I noticed when all of this began.

Turns out it may have been sofware issue. I suspected software anyway because rebooting could temporarily cure it. I spoke to an Apple Service and Support person on the phone. She went through a fairly lengthy process with me to evaluate the machine and determine if it was hardware or software related. The results of those steps did not lead her to any concrete conclusions but she was able to hear the beeping issue happening in real time. She guided me through the steps of O/S recovery and now several hours later the machine appears to be functioning as it is supposed to. Typically the issue(s) would show up after maybe twenty minutes or a half hour after a hard boot. I am to monitor the thing for the next week or so watching for any signs of the issues slowly returning.
Here's keeping my fingers crossed.

Inconsistent entries between driver_aliases and path_to_inst

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for