Inconsistent results from AlphaComposite and AffineTransform

I'm developing a game using Java, and I've run into a fairly major issue. On my primary development machine, I can use combinations of AlphaComposite.SRC_IN and AffineTransforms with rotation just fine (I'm using the composite to create a lighting overlay for the game by drawing light beams onto the alpha channel of an all-black image buffer). On my other computer, while the image itself rotates and draws on the alpha channel fine, the computer also completely clears a bounding rectangle around the rotated image.
The first computer (the one for which this works) has a GeForce 8800GTS video card, while the second has an older Radeon 9700. The first computer also has the most recent version of the JDK (6). Could either of these factors make the difference?
edit: Upgrading to JDK 6 fixed it. Will need to include a notice about upgrading to JDK 6 with the game, probably.
Message was edited by:
Hyouko

Hi
Yes I have a debug line that prints them out in the doAutoLoadBalancing method - this is the point where I am diagnosing the problem. It only prints the correct results after I have already run the procedure from the SQL command line.
public UserNumber[] doAutoLoadBalancing () throws SQLException {
autoLBNumbersNeeded.clearParameters();
autoLBNumbersNeeded.execute();
mwFF = autoLBNumbersNeeded.getLong(1);
mwHF = autoLBNumbersNeeded.getLong(2);
wmFF = autoLBNumbersNeeded.getLong(3);
wmHF = autoLBNumbersNeeded.getLong(4);
autoLBNumbersNeeded.clearParameters();
if (m_cat.isDebugEnabled()) {m_cat.debug("mwFF: "+mwFF+"; mwHF: " +mwHF+"; wmFF: "+wmFF+"; wmHF: "+wmHF);}
</pre>

Similar Messages

Inconsistent results with localtimestamp and current_timestamp

Running XE on Windows XP with the system timezone to GMT rebooted, restarted XE)
Oracle Database 10g Express Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Product
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE     10.2.0.1.0     Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
I'm getting incorrect and inconsistent results with current_timestamp and localtimestamp:
With SQL, localtimestamp computes the wrong offset (appears to use 1987-2006 DST rules):
select
dbtimezone
, sessiontimezone
, current_timestamp
, current_timestamp + numtodsinterval(18,'day') as current_timestamp18
, localtimestamp
from dual;
+00:00
US/Eastern
17-MAR-10 10.27.17.376000000 AM US/EASTERN
04-APR-10 10.27.17.376000000 AM US/EASTERN
17-MAR-10 09.27.17.376000000 AM
however, in PL/SQL, both current_timestamp and localtimestamp return the wrong hour value, and adding 18 to current_timestamp shows it is using 1987-2006 DST rules (1st sunday of april)/ note that this happens in straight PL/SQL and in embedded SQL (same results selecting from tables other than DUAL):
begin
for r1 in (
select
dbtimezone
, sessiontimezone
, current_timestamp
, current_timestamp + numtodsinterval(18,'day') as current_timestamp18
, localtimestamp
from dual
loop
dbms_output.put_line('SQL dbtimezone = ' || r1.dbtimezone);
dbms_output.put_line('SQL sessiontimezone = ' || r1.sessiontimezone);
dbms_output.put_line('SQL current_timestamp = ' || r1.current_timestamp);
dbms_output.put_line('SQL current_timestamp +18 = ' || r1.current_timestamp18);
dbms_output.put_line('SQL localtimestamp = ' || r1.localtimestamp);
end loop;
dbms_output.put_line('dbtimezone = ' || dbtimezone);
dbms_output.put_line('sessiontimezone = ' || sessiontimezone);
dbms_output.put_line('systimestamp = ' || systimestamp);
dbms_output.put_line('current_timestamp = ' || current_timestamp);
dbms_output.put_line('current_timestamp +18 = ' || (current_timestamp + numtodsinterval(18,'day')));
dbms_output.put_line('localtimestamp = ' || localtimestamp);
end;
SQL dbtimezone = +00:00
SQL sessiontimezone = US/Eastern
SQL current_timestamp = 17-MAR-10 09.29.32.784000 AM US/EASTERN
SQL current_timestamp +18 = 04-APR-10 10.29.32.784000000 AM US/EASTERN
SQL localtimestamp = 17-MAR-10 09.29.32.784000 AM
dbtimezone = +00:00
sessiontimezone = US/Eastern
systimestamp = 17-MAR-10 02.29.32.784000000 PM +00:00
current_timestamp = 17-MAR-10 09.29.32.784000000 AM US/EASTERN
current_timestamp +18 = 04-APR-10 10.29.32.784000000 AM US/EASTERN
localtimestamp = 17-MAR-10 09.29.32.784000000 AM
dbtimezone = +00:00
sessiontimezone = US/Eastern
systimestamp = 17-MAR-10 02.16.21.366000000 PM +00:00
current_timestamp = 17-MAR-10 09.16.21.366000000 AM US/EASTERN
current_timestamp +18 = 04-APR-10 10.16.21.366000000 AM US/EASTERN
localtimestamp = 17-MAR-10 09.16.21.366000000 AM
is this a known bug?
is there a patch or a work-around for XE?
are other datasbase versions affected?

Can't patch XE, unfortunately it comes with pre-2007 DST rules.
There is a metalink note describing how to fix the DST changes, and while it's not really a "supported" method, neither is XE- if you can get updated timezone files from a later patch set for the same release, 10gR2, on the right operating system, shutdown/startup the database the updated DST rules will be in place. The timezone files are in $ORACLE_HOME/oracore/zoneinfo.
Another unfortunately, any values already stored in the database using timestamp with local timezone datatypes for the affected period of the DST changes won't be correct, i.e. there is no 2010-03-14 02:01 (?) but with older timezone rules in place that would be a valid timestamp. The data has to be saved before updating the timezone file, and re-translated to timestamp w/local tz datatypes after the update.
IMHO storing literal timezone info isn't an ideal practice, let the client settings do the time interpretation, time is always changing. Its the interpretation of the time that gets changed. From time to time. :(

Inconsistent Results from dbms_output.get_lines

Hi,
I am getting inconsistent results from using dbms_output.get_lines.
I'm using get_lines in a procedure A that executes a function B to test if the function returns 0 or > 0 to indicate validity of my data. In that function, I use dbms_output.put_lines to communicate data points that I want to use. My procedure A does a get_lines after executing function B then either logs the lines into a table or sends an email.
Right now, get_lines is behaving sporadically for me. Sometimes I the chararr returns some lines while other times it doesn't. The strange thing is numlines does return a value, and it's the value that I expected.
Can someone please help?
Thanks.

Use parameters or even global package variables to transport data from one procedure to the other. dbms_output is not meant for this, it will not work.

Inconsistent results from CallableStatement

We are getting inconsistent results from a call to an Oracle database. We have a CallableStatement that returns 4 INTEGERs.
It runs perfectly if I run the Oracle procedure directly from the sql command line and then call it from the java code.
However if I recompile the Oracle stored procedures and execute the Callable Statement (without first running it from sql) then I am getting incorrect results...1,2,1,1 is being returned instead of 1,2,0,3. Are these results being cached somewhere???
We are using Oracle 8.1.7, JDK 1.3.1, and Oracle thin driver 8.1.7.
The code is as follows:
<pre>
private CallableStatement autoLBNumbersNeeded;
private void prepareStatements(){
     autoLBNumbersNeeded=dbConnection.prepareCall("{CALL
     pkg_scheduler.pr_auto_lb_nos(?,?,?,?)}");
     autoLBNumbersNeeded.clearParameters();
     autoLBNumbersNeeded.registerOutParameter(1, java.sql.Types.INTEGER);
     autoLBNumbersNeeded.registerOutParameter(2, java.sql.Types.INTEGER);
     autoLBNumbersNeeded.registerOutParameter(3, java.sql.Types.INTEGER);
     autoLBNumbersNeeded.registerOutParameter(4, java.sql.Types.INTEGER);
public UserNumber[] doAutoLoadBalancing () throws SQLException {
autoLBNumbersNeeded.clearParameters();
autoLBNumbersNeeded.execute();
mwFF = autoLBNumbersNeeded.getLong(1);
mwHF = autoLBNumbersNeeded.getLong(2);
wmFF = autoLBNumbersNeeded.getLong(3);
wmHF = autoLBNumbersNeeded.getLong(4);
autoLBNumbersNeeded.clearParameters();
</pre>
The Oracle procedure is
<pre>
PROCEDURE proc1( p_parm_1 OUT NUMBER, p_parm_2 OUT NUMBER, p_parm_3
OUT NUMBER, p_parm_4 OUT NUMBER)
AS
BEGIN
-- Get Counts
SELECT COUNT(*)
INTO p_parm_1
FROM blah ......
SELECT COUNT(*)
INTO p_parm_2
FROM blah ......
SELECT COUNT(*)
INTO p_parm_3
FROM blah ......
SELECT COUNT(*)
INTO p_parm_4
FROM blah ......
EXCEPTION
blah .......
END proc1;
</pre>
Can anyone help?
Many thanks
Fionnuala

Hi
Yes I have a debug line that prints them out in the doAutoLoadBalancing method - this is the point where I am diagnosing the problem. It only prints the correct results after I have already run the procedure from the SQL command line.
public UserNumber[] doAutoLoadBalancing () throws SQLException {
autoLBNumbersNeeded.clearParameters();
autoLBNumbersNeeded.execute();
mwFF = autoLBNumbersNeeded.getLong(1);
mwHF = autoLBNumbersNeeded.getLong(2);
wmFF = autoLBNumbersNeeded.getLong(3);
wmHF = autoLBNumbersNeeded.getLong(4);
autoLBNumbersNeeded.clearParameters();
if (m_cat.isDebugEnabled()) {m_cat.debug("mwFF: "+mwFF+"; mwHF: " +mwHF+"; wmFF: "+wmFF+"; wmHF: "+wmHF);}
</pre>

I can't prevent Spotlight from returning results from emails and Safari

Try as I might, I can't prevent Spotlight from returning results from emails and from Safari web browser history.
I've toggled the two relevant boxes in the Spotlight system preferences, and rebuilt the index, but it still returns results from categories that I have deselected (like emails and webpages).
The system preferences say "Only selected categories will appear in Spotlight search results". If only it were true!

I think this could be a reason, your settings regarding indexing of mail messages didn't stick.
I'm having other problems with security update 2008-005.
It'd be interesting to know if OnyX is able to fix your problem again. Hopefully its doings survive the next update.

Inconsistent results from rpm

Hi Oracle Forums,
     I am installing packages required for Oracle Database 11gR2, and am having problems with rpm responses.
     When I query rpm about a package, it tells me that the package is not installed. When I go to install the package, rpm informs me that the package is already installed. An example is shown below:
[root@OELVM02 Server]# uname -a
Linux OELVM02.localdomain 2.6.32-300.10.1.el5uek #1 SMP Wed Feb 22 17:37:40 EST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@OELVM02 Server]#
[root@OELVM02 Server]# pwd
/media/OL5.8 x86_64 dvd 20120229/Server
[root@OELVM02 Server]#
[root@OELVM02 Server]# ls -alrt binutils-2.17.50.0.6-20.el5.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3069914 Dec 28 2011 binutils-2.17.50.0.6-20.el5.x86_64.rpm
[root@OELVM02 Server]#
[root@OELVM02 Server]# rpm -q ./binutils-2.17.50.0.6-20.el5.x86_64.rpm
package ./binutils-2.17.50.0.6-20.el5.x86_64.rpm is not installed
[root@OELVM02 Server]#
[root@OELVM02 Server]# rpm -ivh ./binutils-2.17.50.0.6-20.el5.x86_64.rpm
warning: ./binutils-2.17.50.0.6-20.el5.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 1e5e0159
Preparing...                ########################################### [100%]
        package binutils-2.17.50.0.6-20.el5.x86_64 is already installed
[root@OELVM02 Server]#
[root@OELVM02 Server]# rpm -q ./binutils-2.17.50.0.6-20.el5.x86_64.rpm
package ./binutils-2.17.50.0.6-20.el5.x86_64.rpm is not installed
[root@OELVM02 Server]#     I do not understand the inconsistent results that rpm is giving me.
     Any help would be greatly appreciated
     Thanks
     Gavin

Hi Avi,
     Thanks for your quick response!!
     The Oracle documentation requires that both the 32 and 64 bit rpm's be installed for some packages. In the below scenario, is rpm telling me that both 32 and 64 bit packages are installed?
[root@OELVM02 Server]# uname -a
Linux OELVM02.localdomain 2.6.32-300.10.1.el5uek #1 SMP Wed Feb 22 17:37:40 EST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@OELVM02 Server]#
[root@OELVM02 Server]# pwd
/media/OL5.8 x86_64 dvd 20120229/Server
[root@OELVM02 Server]#
[root@OELVM02 Server]# ls -alrt *glibc-2*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1544040 Nov 18 2010 compat-glibc-2.3.4-2.26.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1069214 Nov 18 2010 compat-glibc-2.3.4-2.26.i386.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5607577 Feb 26 2012 glibc-2.5-81.i686.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4997627 Feb 26 2012 glibc-2.5-81.x86_64.rpm
[root@OELVM02 Server]#
[root@OELVM02 Server]# rpm -q glibc-2.5-81.i686
glibc-2.5-81
[root@OELVM02 Server]#
[root@OELVM02 Server]# rpm -q glibc-2.5-81.x86_64
glibc-2.5-81
[root@OELVM02 Server]#
[root@OELVM02 Server]#     Thanks heaps
     Gavin

Why can't I get search results from Travelocity and Priceline using FF21?

When I use the Travelocity fight search page, I get an error page each time I use it. It works fine in IE. The same thing happens after getting a list of results from Priceline.com. You click on a flight and an error page appears. Again, it works fine in IE.

Hello,
'''Try Firefox Safe Mode''' to see if the problem goes away. Safe Mode is a troubleshooting mode, which disables most add-ons.
''(If you're not using it, switch to the Default theme.)''
* You can open Firefox 4.0+ in Safe Mode by holding the '''Shift''' key when you open the Firefox desktop or Start menu shortcut.
* Or open the Help menu and click on the '''Restart with Add-ons Disabled...''' menu item while Firefox is running.
''Once you get the pop-up, just select "'Start in Safe Mode"''
'''''If the issue is not present in Firefox Safe Mode''''', your problem is probably caused by an extension, and you need to figure out which one. Please follow the [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]] article for that.
''To exit the Firefox Safe Mode, just close Firefox and wait a few seconds before opening Firefox for normal use again.''
''When you figure out what's causing your issues, please let us know. It might help other users who have the same problem.''
Thank you.

Select statement returns different results from 9i and 10g

Hi all,
Would appreciate if someone could help to solve this puzzle here:
I have the exact the statements running on Oracle 9i and 10g, why do they return different results?
Select unique(GroupDesc) , GroupSeq from Module where ModuleId in (Select ModuleId from User_Access where UserId='admin') and Status='A'
In Oracle 9i:
Both columns returned as follows...
GroupDesc | GroupSeq
In Oracle 10g:
Only one column returned, the column with unique keyword was missing...
GroupSeq
Could anyone enlighten me?

yes, the table structure... actually the CREATE TABLE statement...
with some sample data (INSERT INTO)
and the actual queries (both of them - copy-paste them from each separate environment)
you can use tags around the statements this will format it to a fixed font - making it easier to read
Edited by: Alex Nuijten on Feb 20, 2009 10:05 AM

Inconsistent results between SDO_RELATE and SDO_GEOM.RELATE

Maybe its the Friday syndrome, but I'm getting some results that I can't get my head around...
Let say I have a table with a single line geometry...
CREATE TABLE BUFFER_TEST (
     WHAT VARCHAR2(100),
     GEOMETRY SDO_GEOMETRY);
INSERT INTO user_sdo_geom_metadata VALUES ('BUFFER_TEST','GEOMETRY',
MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ARRAY(
     MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X',400000,750000,0.0005),
     MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y',500000,1000000,0.0005)),
262152);
CREATE INDEX BUFFER_TEST_IDX ON BUFFER_TEST (GEOMETRY) INDEXTYPE IS MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX;
INSERT INTO BUFFER_TEST (what, geometry)
VALUES ('line',
SDO_GEOMETRY(2002, 262152, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 2, 1),
SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(713353.165, 736165.812, 713353.449, 736165.402, 713353.849,
736164.203, 713353.85, 736162.252, 713353.087, 736149.092)));
COMMIT;Now I want to buffer this line and check if the line is inside the buffer - the actual business need is to see if other lines are in the buffer, but we'll keep it simple for now...
So in the snippet below, I'm buffering the line by 50cm and then using SDO_INSIDE to see if the line is inside the buffer - it isn't.
Then if I use SDO_GEOM.RELATE to determine the relationship, it says INSIDE, which is correct.
Then if I increase the buffer size to 1m, then SDO_INSIDE and SDO_GEOM.RELATE both return the correct result.
SQL> DECLARE
2   l_inside NUMBER;
3   l_small_buffer SDO_GEOMETRY;
4   l_determine VARCHAR2(100);
5   l_buffer_size NUMBER := 0.5;
6 BEGIN
7
8     SELECT SDO_GEOM.SDO_BUFFER(b.geometry, usgm.diminfo, l_buffer_size)
9     INTO      l_small_buffer
10     FROM    user_sdo_geom_metadata usgm, BUFFER_TEST b
11     WHERE usgm.table_name = 'BUFFER_TEST'
12     AND      usgm.column_name = 'GEOMETRY'
13     AND      b.what = 'line';
14
15     SELECT COUNT(*)
16     INTO    l_inside
17     FROM   BUFFER_TEST
18     WHERE SDO_INSIDE(geometry, l_small_buffer) = 'TRUE'
19     AND     what = 'line';
20
21     SELECT SDO_GEOM.RELATE(geometry, 'determine', l_small_buffer, 0.0005) relationship
22     INTO l_determine
23     FROM BUFFER_TEST
24     WHERE what = 'line';
25
26     DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('l_inside: ' || l_inside || ' relationship ' || l_determine);
27
28 END;
29 /
l_inside: 0 relationship INSIDEAny help would be much appreciated... I'm starting to pull my hair out on this.
This is on Oracle 10.2.0.3

I can reproduce this on 11.1.0.6 on Windows 32bit.
Would you recommend I open a support case on this? Do you think it would be possible to backport a fix to 10.2.0.4?

Inconsistent results from database calls

Hi all I was wondering if anyone would be able to come up with some possible ideas as to why my application is inconsistently retrieving data from a database. I have an application that is pulling information from a database. These calls can be made repetitively pulling the same information over and over again. The quandry that I am faced with is why the application would pull the right data most of the time, but occasionally not pull the correct values.
I have consided the following:
blocking - all of the calls are read only and scroll insensitive so I doubt this is the case
Limited number of connections
Seems like apossibility but then I would expect an error to be thrown.
Actions happening to fast
I was thinking perhaps the cycle is completing before everything has had a chance to finish the last set - is that a possibility ?
I can't post the code, so I am just looking for any general thoughts or ideas on the topic, if nothing thanks anyways.

Thank you both for your thoughts. The transactions is definately not a possibility (at least as I understand) as this is on read information only, there is no commits nor any updates being completed by this method.
I will continue to hunt down this little bugger. The biggest issue is that it is one behemoth of a method that should not exist, but unfortunately does.

There is a difference between the results from labwindows and VS

hello,
I use the same procedure to process the same data respectively by Labwindows/CVI and vs, and got two differents rusults, how does this happen?
Attached both Labwindows/CVI and C++program. Read data from "JFfg5.txt" and output the results to the "out.txt".
Attachments:
读入.cpp ‏4 KB
f.c ‏5 KB
JFfg5.txt ‏801 KB

Hi Séverine,
Do you find any additional code added to SBO_SP_Transaction stored procedure. A similar issue with stock transfer fixed in later patch. Please test in latest patch.
Regards,
Vijay kumar
SAP Business One Forums Team

Different results from MAX and Labview

Hi all,
We did an impact testing a couple of days ago, and I got very big acceleration (the peak is about 300g, which is much larger than the estimated value).
And then I tried a small imact test in the lab using a steel plate which is less than 1 lb to impact a steel ruler, I still got big peak number (more than 200g, which is impossible). And then I tried the small impact test again by using MAX, the peak number is about 12g, and the curve seems like pretty reasonable. I was wondering why I got different results by using MAX and Labview?
Also, sometimes when I connect the SCXI-1001 to the computer, it says the USB is malfuntion and cannot be recgonized by the computer, and turns out the driver file does not exists. But most of the time, it works very well and the driver file does exists. Why this happened?
Thanks.
Yuan

jyuan wrote: but I want to clike one "run button" and get data from strain gage, LVDT, accelerometer at the same time and our tesing duration is just about a few seconds. And also I didn't find a place where I can record the data in MAX
You can do that. A task can only have the same types of inputs, meaning Analog Input, Analog Output, Digital Input, Digital Output, etc. Different sensors are just read with Analog Inputs. So they all can be in the same task. In MAX, just set up a task a configure each channel as it should be. Then use that single task in your LabVIEW code.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines

Different results from SQLPlus and ResultSet

Hello!
I'm using Oracle Server and when I query in SQL-Plus:
"select count(*) from table1", I get the result "2 rows"
But - when I query in JDBC:
PreparedStatement pstmt = dbconn.prepareStatement(same query....);
pstmt.executeQuery();
rset=pstmt.getResultSet();
rset.next ();
rset.getString (1)
Returns only "1 row"...
In addition, when I query for "select * from table1", in JDBC, I get as results only from the 2nd record to the last..."
In all cases, for some reason, it truncate the first row! :-(
Why is there a difference between them?
Thank you all in advance!

rset.getString (1)If you are doing "select count(*)" that should be getInt(1).
pstmt.executeQuery();
rset=pstmt.getResultSet();Try "rset = pstmt.executeQuery()" instead of those two lines. That is the usual way of doing it.
PreparedStatement pstmt = dbconn.prepareStatement(same query....);Show us the prepareStatement call with the SQL query. Don't edit it in any way, don't abbreviate it, don't even remove a single space in it, copy&paste it exactly the way it is.

Getting Inconsistent Results from Web Service

We have a web service that provides Qty Available for several item numbers (current 252 item numbers). It takes in an array of item numbers to be checked. It returns an xml file with those item numbers and the qty available, which is drawn directly from a single table that is repopulated every fifteen minutes. Our customer said that his system shows a different number of records returned each time with consecutive polls.
I tested the service using the endpoint testing web page. (I hope that's the correct term - I am fairly new to this.) I manually entered 175 item numbers.
The first result set had a block of 74 item numbers missing from the middle. The second result set returned everything.
Sample data excerpt:
   <ns0:result>
    <ROWSET>
     <ROW
       num="1">
      <ITEM_NBR>K5-8PE-RD</ITEM_NBR>
      <QTY_AVAILABLE>442</QTY_AVAILABLE>
     </ROW>
    </ROWSET>
   </ns0:result>
   <ns0:result>
    <ROWSET>
     <ROW
       num="1">
      <ITEM_NBR>K5-8PE-WH</ITEM_NBR>
      <QTY_AVAILABLE>5650</QTY_AVAILABLE>
     </ROW>
    </ROWSET>
   </ns0:result>
   <ns0:result
     xsi:nil="1"/>
   <ns0:result
     xsi:nil="1"/>
   <ns0:result
     xsi:nil="1"/>Does this make sense?
Thanks,
Gregory

Turns out the problem was in the Java method. It seems it was opening a new connection for each item number and not closing them.
Changed code to open the connection once, run through the item list, then close the connection.

How to get numeric result from 'search and replace' string function

hii
i am using search and replace function to get output.my output is of form ' *X0123.3 ' .here i am replacing the term *X01 with space because i need only 23.3 as a result.but i am unable to get that out in the output indicator.i used lot of functions like string to number and so on but i am getting output as zero .can you please suggest me wt to do.i am attaching a copy of my file.
Attachments:
Untitled 1.vi ‏25 KB

Your problem is the fact that you are converting it to an integer, thus loosing the fractional part. You need to use "Fract/Exp String To Number" instead and create a DBL so yor data is 23.3 instead of 23.
You also don't need to manipulate the string if the initial part is of constant lenght. Just use the offset input as in the figure below.
Message Edited by altenbach on 07-31-2006 07:02 AM
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .
Attachments:
ToDBL.png ‏2 KB

Inconsistent results from AlphaComposite and AffineTransform

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for