Indexes with Oracle9iR2

Hi there,
I'm developing a VC++ client to import data from a file in an Oracle9iR2 Database.
The table (PERSON) has only one column (PERSONDOC) which contains XML Type data.
My question is which is the best way to keep index up to date.
The main problem is that before modifying any data I need to execute the following query to find out if a user is alreaddy present in the database so if the index are not updated the query returns inconsistent result.
SELECT TN.PERSONDOC.extract('PERSON[NAME/NICKNAME="user"]').getStringVal()
FROM ENTERPRISE.PERSON TN
WHERE CONTAINS(TN.PERSONDOC,'haspath('PERSON[NAME/NICKNAME="user"]') > 0
I also tried without using index,but on a database with only 1000 records a query takes 3 sec to be executed.
Best Regards,
Luca Bazzocchi

Ok,
I created a ctxxpath index:
CREATE INDEX ENTERPRISE.PERSONDOC_IDX ON ENTERPRISE.PERSON(PERSONDOC)
INDEXTYPE IS ctxsys.CTXXPATH;
and I tried to run a sync operation as SYSEM user
"exec ctx_ddl.sync_index('ENTERPRISE.PERSONDOC_IDX');"
but I had the following error:
BEGIN ctx_ddl.sync_index('ENTERPRISE.PERSONDOC_IDX'); END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-20000: Oracle Text error:
DRG-10017: you must be CTXSYS or ENTERPRISE to do this: SYNC
ORA-06512: at "CTXSYS.DRUE", line 157
ORA-06512: at "CTXSYS.CTX_DDL", line 1328
ORA-06512: at line 1
then I reconnect as ENTERPRISE
and the error was
BEGIN ctx_ddl.sync_index('ENTERPRISE.PERSONDOC_IDX'); END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PLS-00201: identifier 'CTX_DDL' must be declared
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PL/SQL: Statement ignored
I don't know what to do now...I executed all the commands from "SQL*Plus Worksheet".
Another question is where I can find docs about how to define jobs or similar,as You understand I am a new Oracle user.
Thanks a lot,regards,
Luca Bazzocchi

Similar Messages

Error when creating index with parallel option on very large table

I am getting a
"7:15:52 AM ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kxfqupp_bad_cvl], [7940], [6], [0], [], [], [], []"
error when creating an index with parallel option. Which is strange because this has not been a problem until now. We just hit 60 million rows in a 45 column table, and I wonder if we've hit a bug.
Version 10.2.0.4
O/S Linux
As a test I removed the parallel option and several of the indexes were created with no problem, but many still threw the same error... Strange. Do I need a patch update of some kind?

This is most certainly a bug.
From metalink it looks like bug 4695511 - fixed in 10.2.0.4.1

Can we associate index with foreign key?

hello
i have searched and could not find the answer to the above;
i have a foreign key constraint on the tables; i added an index on that column as well;
however when i query the all_constraints, under index_name for this foreign constraint there is nothing; only when i have PK/UK i case see indexes associated with them;
will then oracle still associate my index with the FK constrained column? or i need to excplicity associate it with the foreign key column? if so, how to do that?
thx
rgds

Hi,
UserMB wrote:
i have a foreign key constraint on the tables; i added an index on that column as well;It helps if you give a specific example, such as:
"I have a foreign key constraint, where emp.deptno references dept.deptno. (Deptno is the primary key of dept.) I created an index called emp_deptno_idx on emp.deptno as well."
however when i query the all_constraints, under index_name for this foreign constraint there is nothing; only when i have PK/UK i case see indexes associated with them;Not all indexes are associated with a constraint. In the example above, you wouldn't expect to see anything about the index emp_demptno_idx in all_constraints or in all_cons_columns.
will then oracle still associate my index with the FK constrained column? or i need to excplicity associate it with the foreign key column? if so, how to do that?In the situation above, Oracle will still use the index when the optimizer thinks it will help. You don't have to do anything else.

Problem generating index with 2th level in cs4

Windows XP sp 3 - Indesign CS4 601
When generating an index with a 1st and a 2th level, in the 2th level the entry of the 1st entry is always repeated.
E.g. the index should look as this:
text     75
     capitalized     76
     import     78
word     105
     language     108
     meaning     109
But actually the index looks as this:
text     75
     textcapitalized     76
     textimport     78
word     105
     wordlanguage     108
     wordmeaning     109
Is this a bug, or is there a solution for it?
Thanks for your help!
Luc Van de Cruys
phaedra creative communications

Oops!
Just tested the script.
I run it, and I get the script alert 'All Done' at the end.
But nothing happens.
This is what I do:
- I generate the index.
- I select the index with the text tool (select all or just put the textcursor somewhere in the index makes no difference).
- I run the script
- I get the message 'all done', but there is no difference. The problem persists.
Any other ideas?
Thanks anyway.
L.L.

Performance - composite index with 'OR' in 'WHERE' clause

I have a problem with the performance of the following query:
select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_index1) */ knr, projnr, actnr from omschact where ((knr = 100 and actnr > 30) or knr > 100)
and rownum = 1;
(rownum used only for test purpose)
index:
create index on omschact (knr, projnr);
Execution plan:
Id Operation
0 SELECT STATEMENT
1 COUNT STOPKEY
2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID
3 INDEX FULL SCAN
If I'm correct, the 'OR' in the 'WHERE' clause is responsible for the INDEX FULL SCAN, what makes the query slow.
A solution would be then to separate the 'WHERE' clause in 2 separate select's (1 with 'knr = 100 and actnr > 30' and 1 with 'knr > 100' and combine the results with a UNION ALL.
Since it's necessary to have all rows in ascending order (oma_index1) I still have to use an ORDER BY to make sure the order of the rows is correct. This results again in a (too) low performance.
Another solution that does the trick is to create an index with the 2 fields (knr, projnr) concatenated and to use the same in the 'WHERE' clause:
create index oma_index2 on omschact (knr || projnr);
select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_index2) */ knr, projnr, actnr from omschact where (knr || projnr) > 10030;
I just can't believe this work-around is the only solution, so I was hoping that someone here knows of a better way to solve this.

padders,
I'll give the real data instead of the example. The index I really use consists of 4 fields. In this table the fields are just numbers, but in other tables I need to use char-fields in indexes, so that's why I concatenate instead of using formula's (allthough I would prefer the latter).
SQL> desc omschact
Name Null? Type
KNR NOT NULL NUMBER(8)
PROJNR NOT NULL NUMBER(8)
ACTNR NOT NULL NUMBER(8)
REGELNR NOT NULL NUMBER(3)
REGEL CHAR(60)
first methode:
SQL> create index oma_key_001(knr,projnr,actnr,regelnr);
Index created.
SQL> select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where
2 (knr > 100 or
3 (knr = 100 and projnr > 30) or
4 (knr = 100 and projnr = 30 and actnr > 100000) or
5 (knr = 100 and projnr = 30 and actnr = 100000 and regelnr >= 0));
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1117430516
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 11M| 822M| 192K (1)| 00:38:26 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 11M| 822M| 192K (1)| 00:38:26 |
|* 2 | INDEX FULL SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 11M| | 34030 (1)| 00:06:49 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter("KNR">100 OR "KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR">30 OR "KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR"=30
AND "ACTNR">100000 OR "ACTNR"=100000 AND "KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR"=30 AND
"REGELNR">=0)
second method (same index):
SQL> select * from (
2 select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where knr > 100
3 union all
4 select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where knr = 100 and projnr > 30
5 union all
6 select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where knr = 100 and projnr = 30 and actnr > 100000
7 union all
8 select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where knr = 100 and projnr = 30 and actnr = 100000 and regelnr > 0)
9 order by knr, projnr, actnr, regelnr;
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 292918786
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 11M| 1203M| | 477K (1)| 01:35:31 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 11M| 1203M| 2745M| 477K (1)| 01:35:31 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 11M| 1203M| | 192K (1)| 00:38:29 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | | | | | |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 11M| 822M| | 192K (1)| 00:38:26 |
|* 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 11M| | | 33966 (1)| 00:06:48 |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 16705 | 1272K| | 294 (1)| 00:00:04 |
|* 7 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 16705 | | | 54 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 8 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 47 | 3666 | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 9 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 47 | | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 1 | 78 | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 11 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 1 | | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
5 - access("KNR">100)
7 - access("KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR">30)
9 - access("KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR"=30 AND "ACTNR">100000)
11 - access("KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR"=30 AND "ACTNR"=100000 AND "REGELNR">0)
third method:
SQL> create index oma_test(to_char(knr,'00000000')||to_char(projnr,'00000000')||to_char(actnr,'00000000')||to_char(regelnr,'000'));
Index created.
SQL> select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_test) */ * from omschact where
2 (to_char(knr,'00000000')||to_char(projnr,'00000000')||
3 to_char(actnr,'00000000')||to_char(regelnr,'000')) >=
4 (to_char(100,'00000000')||to_char(30,'00000000')||
5* to_char(100000,'00000000')||to_char(0,'000'))
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 424961364
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 553K| 55M| 1712 (1)| 00:00:21 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 553K| 55M| 1712 (1)| 00:00:21 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_TEST | 99543 | | 605 (1)| 00:00:08 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access(TO_CHAR("KNR",'00000000')||TO_CHAR("PROJNR",'00000000')||TO_CHAR("
ACTNR",'00000000')||TO_CHAR("REGELNR",'000')>=TO_CHAR(100,'00000000')||TO_CHAR(3
0,'00000000')||TO_CHAR(100000,'00000000')||TO_CHAR(0,'000'))

Performance of context index with sorting

Dear All,
I've got a problem and don't know how to solve this.
there has a table which have a XMLTYPE field to store the unstructred xml, and created with context index.
When I try to select a record from it by using contains (res, '[searchingfield]')>0, the response time is quick, but when I try to order by another field which in the same table, the response time is drop down slightly. (ex. select id, path, res, update_date from testingtbl where contains(res, 'shopper')>0 order by update_date desc.
Actually there is a context index build for field 'res', any other index build for field 'update_date', when sql without 'order by update_date', the context index will use, but the update_date index will not be used even have ordering criteria.
Is there any expect can tell how to solve this? how to keep the performance even doing the sorting process?
Thanks and Regards
Raymond

Thanks for your quick reply.
The mentions information provide after back to office, actually I just want to know if there is any method(s) which can use the context index (with contains keyword) and sorting without slow down the performance.
Thanks and Regards
Raymond

CDS-18010 Error:A Index and a index with the same name

Hi
I am facing strange error is some one expert there to help me to get rid of this error.
CDS-18010 Error:A Index and a index with the same name 'LA_SP_FK_1' have been asked to be created.
I am generating tables from Data model diagram & getting this error.
Thanks,
Vijay

Your Right!!
Designer does not like 2 of the same name.
there are several bugs on the same name issue and CDS-18010
Bug.3973155/3443005 (92) CDS-18010 IN CAPTURING A TYPE WITH CONSTRUCTOR FUNTIONS IN ITS BODY:
Bug.2586582 (93) CDS-18010 A DOMAIN AND A DOMAIN WITH THE SAME NAME 'D1' BEEN ASKED TO CREATE:
Bug.2561625 (15) CDS-18010 GENERATION OF TWO SYNONYMS WITH SAME NAME BUT DIFFERENT SCOPE:
Bug.2072505 (93) CDS-18010 CAPTURING 2 TRIGGERS WITH SAME NAME ON ONE TABLE SHOULD BE A WARNING:
Bug.1689800 (90) CDS-18010 PLSQL WITH THE SAME PROCEDURE NAME ALREADY EXISTS:
Bug.1073311/1029997 (96) CDS-18010 ERROR ATTEMPTING TO CREATE 2 PROCEDURES WITH SAME NAME:
Just to name a few.
I would suggest you change the name.
Michael

How to link a full text index with catalog in a PDF file ?

Good morning and thank you for your help.
I already create some PDF files on a folder (with hypertext links between us) and I use the command "Tools\Document processing\Full Text Index with Catalog" to create an index; at this time everything works properly.
Now I want to link this Index to my first PDF file in order to use automatically this index on an advance search in this file.
I hope that someone may answer me!
Thank you.

Now I want to link this Index to my first PDF file in order to use automatically this index on an advance search in this file.
In the properties of the document:

My website looks fine in other browsers but on firefox it comes up like an index with the title first and on the second line it says skip to content. Can this be fixed?

When I look at my website it loads up as an index with the heading on the top line and then a link saying "skip to content" and then the navigation is in bullet points. I have downloaded the latest version of firefox and this has not improved the situation. The website looks fine in other browsers.

Make sure that you do not block the CSS files on that page.
Reload web page(s) and bypass the cache.
* Press and hold Shift and left-click the Reload button.
* Press "Ctrl + F5" or press "Ctrl + Shift + R" (Windows,Linux)
* Press "Cmd + Shift + R" (MAC)
Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox (Tools) > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
*Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Safe+Mode

CREATE INDEX WITH DUPLICATE COLUMN NAME

Hi,
i need to interface our application with an Orale Bridge to CREATE INDEX with duplcate column Name.
For Example
CREATE index NLOT_FOURNLOT_idx ON NLOT(FOURNISSEUR ,NOLOT ,FOURNISSEUR ,NOBLFOUNISSEUR,NOLIGNEBL ,NOLOT ,QTECOLISRECUES ,CODENONQUALITE ,QTECOLISACCEPTE);
CREATE table NLOT(
FOURNISSEUR VARCHAR2(09)
,NOBLFOURNISSEUR VARCHAR2(13)
,NOLIGNEBL VARCHAR2(03)
,NOLOT VARCHAR2(20)
,QTECOLISRECUES VARCHAR2(10)
,CODENONQUALITE VARCHAR2(02)
,QTECOLISACCEPTE VARCHAR2(10)
,NOMBREDECOLISRE VARCHAR2(10)
,NOMBREDECOLISAC VARCHAR2(10)
,FILLER VARCHAR2(1)
,FILLE1 VARCHAR2(1)
,TYPEREFERENCE VARCHAR2(01)
,REFERENC1 VARCHAR2(15)
,CONTROLERECEPTI VARCHAR2(01)
,DATEDEPEREMPTIO VARCHAR2(8)
,CONTROLEPROCHAI VARCHAR2(1)
Thanks
Philippe

Well, you can't do it. ORA-957 is one of those irrevocable errors for which the solution is to remove the duplicate name from the SQL statement.
But, anyway, why do you want to do this? I would guess there's no performance benefit from having the same column indexed twice (of course it's impossible to test this, so it's just my opinion).
Cheers, APC

Secondary Index with or without MANDT field

HI ABAP Guru's,
What is necessary to add field MANDT while creation of secodary index in DBS.
But i some body my superiors challanged to me with out using MANDT our secoday index won't works.
But i tested few scenarios i am not get differnce.
please advice me exactly which scenarios it is mandatory.
Below are the Time taken with deffrent scnarios i created one test program to get the time with secondary index with out secodary index secondary index with mndat fiels
**&with out creation of seconday index
*1st time -57,103,681
2nd Time-55,388,294
**before creation of seconday index with out mandt
I1st time execution-324,119
2nd time progrm execution--391,134
3rd time progrm execution-327,046
4th time progrm execution336,774
5th time progrm execution359,100
6t time progrm execution-328,027
*before creation of seconday index with mandtiI1st time execution-367,623
2nd time progrm execution365,139
3rd-352,328
4th-369,122
5th-352,236
6th380,590
7th466,810
Thanks In Advance,
Kandula.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Nov 18, 2011 1:08 PM

Vishnu Tallapragada wrote:
So if you are maintaining multiple client data on the same database, then not adding MANDT to index will have undesirable effects as any select based on secondary index may return records that are not belonging to this client and deletes and additions on the index from multiple clients will lead to data integrity issues.
Wrong!
WHERE clause decides about data being selected, deleted or what-ever.
Index decides only about HOW data is accessed (if used), not WHAT data is accessed.
If your database returns a different result depending on the indexdefinition,
you should log a call at your DB vendor immediately, because this is a bug.
In general, as the client has usually only a small number of distinct values, it is not a good field,
to convince the database, that this index is a good idea. But on high volume tables it can be very selective
as far as the number of result records is concerned (might cut down 50% when 2 clients!).
In addition it is a very short field, so it should not cost much storage (esp. when compressable).
Szenario:
MANDT+IDX-Field with two clients and lets say 5000 record per client (so that idx access will be interesting),
assuming a given IDX value will return 50 records (25 in each client).
So the select will be
... WHERE MANDT=sy-mandt AND IDX=value
Accesing the index with only IDX will result in stepping down the index-tree (say 3 blocks) and then reading leafblocks
to get the 50 hits for IDX-value (assuming 30 records per leafblock -> 2 leafblocks required to gret the 50 records)
Right now you have accessed 5 blocks to get the address of 50 records that still need to be checked against MANDT.
So there is need to get 50 blocks (may be less, depending on clustering) to do a filter on MANDT
and get the final 25 records for the result.
If you put the MANDT field into the index it might require more space, so that we assume 20 records per leaf block now.
But since you can now filter MANDT already on the index blocks, you will again only need to get 5 blocks and
have the adress of the required 25 target records.
So getting the result is 55 blockinspections without MANDT in index and 30 blockinspections with MANDT in index in this case.
Now you can start pushing around values and statistics an calculate at what amount of data and average
size of resultsets it becomes right or wrong to include MANDT. It may turn out both ways, allthough I think
with MANDT being small, it is usually loss of brain cycles to calculate around for this.
You simply include it, it will cost only little space and it will never be wrong.
You leave it out, you will gain little space, but might end up with performance loss.
If you have only one client in the system, you can safely go with the saving space strategie, as long as you do not need
a UNIQUE secondary index.
Volker

DML operations performance on table indexed with CTXCAT

Hi,
I have a table with 2M records. The table is batch updated once a day, and the number of record movements (update/delete/insert) should be around 100K.
The table is indexed with CTXCAT.
If I create the index from scratch, it takes 5minutes.
If I perform delete/insert/update operations involving 40K records, it takes a lot more (especially for delete and update operations, something like 30 minutes).
In this particular case I can drop the index and recreate it from scratch every night. The problem is that the 2M records table is only the first step in adoption of Oracle Text. The next step will be a 40M records table, on which the initial index creation takes something like 2hours (so I can't rebuild it every night).
Do you have any suggest?
Thanks.
-- table DDL
CREATE TABLE TAHZVCON_TEXT
CONSUMER_ID NUMBER(10) NOT NULL,
COMPANY_NAME VARCHAR2(4000 CHAR),
CITY VARCHAR2(30 BYTE),
PROVINCE VARCHAR2(3 CHAR),
POST_CODE VARCHAR2(10 BYTE)
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TAHZVCON_TEXT_PK ON TAHZVCON_TEXT (CONSUMER_ID);
begin
ctx_ddl.drop_preference('mylex');
ctx_ddl.create_preference('mylex', 'BASIC_LEXER');
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mylex', 'printjoins', '.#');
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mylex', 'base_letter', 'YES');
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mylex', 'index_themes','NO');
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mylex', 'index_text','YES');
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mylex', 'prove_themes','NO');
ctx_ddl.drop_preference('mywordlist');
ctx_ddl.create_preference('mywordlist', 'BASIC_WORDLIST');
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','stemmer','NULL');
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','SUBSTRING_INDEX', 'NO');
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','PREFIX_INDEX','NO');
ctx_ddl.drop_index_set('tahzvcon_iset');
ctx_ddl.create_index_set('tahzvcon_iset');
ctx_ddl.add_index('tahzvcon_iset','city');
ctx_ddl.add_index('tahzvcon_iset','province');
ctx_ddl.add_index('tahzvcon_iset','post_code');
end;
CREATE INDEX TAHZVCON_TEXT_TI01 ON TAHZVCON_TEXT(COMPANY_NAME)
INDEXTYPE IS CTXSYS.CTXCAT
PARAMETERS ('lexer mylex wordlist mywordlist index set tahzvcon_iset')
PARALLEL 8;
Andrea

Hi kevinUCB,
I've decided to use CTXCAT indexes because I had to perform queries involving different columns (company name, city, region, etc.). So I thought CTXCAT was the right index for me.
Now I've discovered that if I index an XML with CONTEXT, I can perform a search on single XML fields, so CONTEXT is suitable for my needs.
Preliminary test on the 2M record table looks very good.
Bye,
Andrea

How to create a concatenated index with a long column (Urgent!!)

We have a situation where we need to create a concatenated unique
index with one of the columns as a "long" datatype. Oracle does
not allow a lot of things with long columns.
Does anyone know if this is possible or if there is a way to get
around it.
All help is appreciated!!!!

From the Oracle SQL Reference ...
"You cannot create an index on columns or attributes whose
type is user-defined, LONG, LONG RAW, LOB, or REF,
except that Oracle supports an index on REF type columns
or attributes that have been defined with a SCOPE clause."
Doesn't mention CLOB or BLOB types, so perhaps you
should consider using one of those types instead. I have a
feeling that the LONG type is now deprecated.

How to initialize the index with "at new" command ??

Hi All,
I am facing a problem of Initializing the index .
I want to Initialize the Index with the " at new "
command within a loop but its not working.
Otherwise,please tell me the way to put a flag on the first record with " at new " command.
Please provide a solution ASAP.

loop at itab.
if sy-index = 1.
set ur flag.
endloop.
check the code below..
LOOP AT lt_citm_b INTO wa_citm_b.
    AT NEW vbeln .
      CLEAR: wa_temp_output , lt_temp_output[].
    ENDAT.
    AT LAST.
      lv_t = 'X'.
    ENDAT.
    LOOP AT lt_char INTO wa_char WHERE instance = wa_citm_b-instance.
      MOVE: c_d TO wa_temp_output-type,
      wa_citm_b-vbeln TO wa_temp_output-vbeln,
      wa_citm_b-posnr TO wa_temp_output-posnr,
      wa_citm_b-matnr TO wa_temp_output-matnr.
      MOVE-CORRESPONDING wa_char TO wa_temp_output.
Special requirement
     IF wa_temp_output-atnam = c_itr AND wa_temp_output-atwrt = c_itr03
                                                    OR
       wa_temp_output-atnam = c_cosr AND wa_temp_output-atwrt = c_osr03.
        CLEAR: wa_temp_output-atnam, wa_temp_output-atwrt.
        MOVE: c_iorp TO wa_temp_output-atnam,
              c_in2-os_nd TO wa_temp_output-atwrt,
              'X' TO wa_temp_output-flag.
      ENDIF.
*If the characteristic value for PMFREQUENCIE is initial need to pull
*the floating value.
      PERFORM fr_get_float TABLES lt_char USING wa_char-atwrt
                                                wa_char-instance
                                                wa_char-atnam
                                       CHANGING wa_temp_output-atwrt.
*To recognize if contract item have extended and standard
*characteristics.
      PERFORM fr_ext_std USING wa_temp_output-atnam
                      CHANGING wa_temp_output-ext
                               wa_temp_output-std.
      APPEND wa_temp_output TO lt_temp_output.
      CLEAR: wa_temp_output, wa_char.
    ENDLOOP.
    SORT lt_temp_output BY vbeln posnr std ext.
    AT END OF vbeln.
To translate the data according to the mapping rules
      PERFORM fr_translate.
      IF lv_t = 'X'.
        DESCRIBE TABLE lt_output LINES gv_count.
        READ TABLE lt_output INTO wa_output INDEX gv_count.
        IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
          CLEAR wa_output.
          MOVE: c_t TO wa_output-type.
          APPEND wa_output TO lt_output.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.

Content has been indexed with Info only. Resubmit should only be performed

Hi All,
Im using the Oracle Content Server (OCS) , When im trying to checkin new document then i get the below mentioned error message can any one plz tell me that what is the problem.
Error Message:_
Text conversion of the file failed.
Content has been indexed with Info only. Resubmit should only be performed if the problem has been resolved.
Text conversion of the file '//awusrp04/PortalStg/oracle/inetucmstg/weblayout/groups/public/@enterprise/@hr/documents/document/s_013020.pdf' failed.
**Content has been indexed with Info only. Resubmit should only be performed if the problem has been resolved. **

Hello Experts,
I am Facing the Same Issue, anybody know the solution for the same?
Thanks in Advance.

Indexes with Oracle9iR2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for