InfoObject does not contain alpha confirming values

Hi ,
I am trying to load data into the object called ZAML_CODE, the type is CHAR and Length is 3.
The characteristic is enabled with ALPHA - Conversion exit.
we are loading data to this object since 3 years successfully.
But now only it is saying that InfoObject ZAML_CODE does not contain alpha confirming values.
Especially we are getting error for numeric values like 1, 2,3 etc only.
Previously numeric values were also loaded successfully.
Now the source system is ECC6.0, previously it was 4.6C. This is the only difference.
Please respond with your suggesions.
Regards
Srinivas

Hello,
Just check if there is space in the front of these numeric values or some garbage value...if there is... then it may not be able to pad it up with zero and hence the issue...check in R/3 about how these values are stored...you can remove the space from the front and change it in PSA...and then load but first do the analysis of the source system and see why its coming up wrong.
Regards
Ajeeet

Similar Messages

  • Error: InfoObject does not contain alpha-conforming value 20030729

    Hi everyone,
    I got this problem, that i tried to fix yesterday, but all i did was that i got realy frustrated...
    I created an infoobject which is copy of 0DOC_NUMBER and has alpha coversion routine.
    Mapping field in DataSource is also type character 10(VBELN) as my infoobject.
    But there are some values in this field that i am trying to load, less then 10 characters long (20030729,20051116...) and shouldn't be there, because the values are dates and not document numbers.
    But anyway on R/3 side this values are in field which is defined as character 10 (VBELN), and when I am trying to load Infopackage(17500 records) I get 52 errors: InfoObject does not contain alpha-conforming value 20030729.
    I don't get it, since both fields are type character 10 and the values are only digits, why do I get this error message and how can I fix it?
    PS:One solution is to remove alpha conversion routine from infoobject, but i don't want that.
    Regards,
    Uroš

    hi,
    sorry... correction, it's 'Exclusive attributes' that cannot be used for navigational attribute, you can set lower case to differentiate ... check the impact of lower case setting here ...
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw33/helpdata/en/b7/f470375fbf307ee10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
    Lowercase letters allowed / not allowed
    If this indicator is set, the system differentiates between lowercase letters and capital letters when you use a screen template to input values. If this indicator is not set, the system converts all the letters into capital letters when you use a screen template to input values.
    If you choose to allow the use of lowercase letters, you must be aware of what happens when you input variables:
    If you want to use the characteristic in variables, the system is only able to find the values for the characteristic if the lowercase letters and the capital letters are typed in accurately on the input screen for variables. If, on the other hand, you do not allow the use of lowercase letters, any characters that you type onto the input screen, are converted automatically into capital letters.
    Exclusive attributes:
    If you select Exclusively Attributes, the created characteristic can be used only as a display attribute for another characteristic, and not as a dedicated characteristic in the InfoCube. Furthermore, you then cannot transfer the characteristic into InfoCubes. However, you can use it in ODS objects or InfoSets.

  • Load ODS - InfoObject: InfoObject does not contain alpa-conforming value

    Hello everybody,
    I get following error while uploading from ODS to InfoObject.
    InfoObject /BIC/ZHOUSENUM does not contain alpa-conforming value 0000000000000000004.
    The data flow is as follows: Transactional InfoSource -> ODS -> InfoObject.
    In the Transfer Rules before ODS I have marked the Conversion check box. The data is populated into ODS without any problems.
    I can even activate the ODS, which reporting enabled.
    When I browse the ODS table with the option check conversion exits unmarked, I can see the value '0000000000000000004'.
    But the upload into InfoObject master data failes
    Any help appreciated.
    TIA
    pawel

    sap_all onboard.
    I assume, this infosource is locked, due to the fact it was system generated.
    On the other hand, there is a s-note 559763 which says:
    If an InfoObject is filled with ALPHA exits from an R/3 System, the BW assumes that the data is to arrive in the internal ALPHA format and therefore does not convert the data.
    I know, it is about R/3 as source system, but I assume the same would be for BW.
    p.

  • Infopack Error ( does not contain alpha conforming value 10)

    When I try to run my infopack which pulla data from BW into APO, the data load fails with the error below:
    "InfoObject /BIC/XXXX does not contain alpa-conforming value 10"  when I click on the details icon, I get the following description.
    Can somebody please throw some light on this as I am new to DP/BW. Appreciate your help if someone can help me with fixing this problem.
                                                                                    Diagnosis                                                                               
    The system checked whether the loaded InfoObject value conforms to the   
         conversion exit.The check failed.                                                                               
    For example:                                                                               
    The value '1' was loaded into an InfoObject with alpha exit, even though 
         the value '0000000001' was expected.                                                                               
    System response                                                                               
    The load process has failed or the erroneous records are displayed in    
         the monitor. This does not depend on how error handling is set up.                                                                               
    Procedure                                                                               
    Find out why the data does not conform to the conversion exit, and, if  
         possible, correct the cause. Possible causes are errors in Business     
         Content or an error in a customer exit in the source system.                                                                               
    If you cannot correct the problem, you have the option of removing the  
         conversion exit on the InfoObject. However, since the system has already
         been converted, duplicates appear in the system again.                  
    Thanks
    Varun

    Hello Varun,
    BW expects your Key Figures to be stored in "alpha conforming format". This is can be roughly described as having 0s in front. For example, if your key figure value is 10, then the alpha conforming value of that is 000000000000000010 (assuming the number of chars in your KF is 18).
    To correct the error do the following:
    In your transfer rule in BW for InfoObject /BIC/XXXX, implement an ABAP routine that calls function module CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_INPUT. Here an example of the ABAP code you should put in your transfer rule for /BIC/XXXX:
    CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_INPUT'
      EXPORTING
        input         = TRAN_STRUCTURE-/bic/xxxx
    IMPORTING
       OUTPUT        = RESULT.
    Hope this helps. Please post again if you have questions.

  • InfoObject does not contain alpha conforming 1

    I am getting the above error message when trying to load text.  I found on several posts that I should change the Conversion column of the Transfer Rules.  But I am trying to determine why this is happening because when I run these loads in the DEV box, they run fine.  I transport the rules to our QA box, and that is when I have the trouble loading and get the error.  I check the data in RSA3 and there is no difference, so it can't be data related.
    If the data is the same, and the rules are the same, what could cause it to work in one box and not the other?
    Thanks,  Keith j

    Hi Keith,
    do you know the source table for the data? Please check that if possible via se16. Sometimes, specially with alpha conversion, even a 0001 from database is displayed as 1 and may lead you to the wrong way. If all settings are the same in your systems it surely must depend on the data itself. May be the better way analyzing the data from the source table is se17.
    kind regards
    Siggi

  • InfoObject REQUESTER does not contain alpa-conforming value 1006152

    Hello All,
    I am trying to load data into ODS.
    The load is failing at "Data Package 6" Record # 11140. I am getting following message at the failed record. -
    "InfoObject REQUESTER does not contain alpa-conforming value 1006152".
    I went ahead and checked this record # 11140, in PSA, in Package # 6. There the requester field is populated with "1006152" where it is expecting "Some description".
    I went ahead and changed the START_ROUTINE. with
    LOOP AT DATA_PACKAGE.
      IF NOT DATA_PACKAGE-REQUESTER cs 'S'.
          DELETE DATA_PACKAGE.
      ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
    Expecting that these erroneous records will be removed and will get a successful load.
    I am getting the same error message at the same record # and data-package number.
    Any help is highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    PK.

    Hi
    when u r having such a problem of Alpha numerical error in a particular for a particular record.Then u just write a Fomula into that Particular formula USE {TOUPPERCASE(REQUESTER)} & thenn reload to the Target...this will solve the problem...to my knowledge..
    try this..
    HOPE THIS HELPS
    THNX
    BI Learner.

  • InfoObject FORWAGENT does not contain alpa-conforming value 100.........

    HI ALL,
    Can someone through some light on resolving the issue
    "InfoObject FORWAGENT does not contain alpa-conforming value 100............"
    In "Details Tab" of the monitor screen
    Requests (messages): Everything OK
    Extraction (messages): Errors occurred --> data selection ended succesfully
    T ransfer (IDocs and TRFC): Errors occurred -->some of the data packets not yet processed
    Processing (data packet): Errors occurred  --> while processing transaction data
    InfoObject FORWAGENT does not contain alpa-conforming value 100............"
    error occured
    Please advice how to solve
    Thanking you in advance,
    Rase

    Hi,
    Use ALPHA conversion in the general tab of the infoobject FORWAGENT.
    then load the data again.
    also in the transfer strcture in the right most side tick the option " alpha....."
    Thanks

  • MIGO error 'Purchase Order does not contain a confirmation control key'

    Hi,
    while posting GR to a PO i am getting an error ' Purchase order XXXXXXXXX does not contain a confirmation control key'
    it is true that i have not defined any confirmation control key in PO, Aknowled rerd checkbox is also not ticked
    Still why this message coming, what setting would be bringing this message
    Please clarity

    Hi,
    Until the installation of Note 589422 (with SP SAPKH46C43) you could  due to a program error - create a delivery even though the purchase order did not contain any confirmation control key.                                                                               
    This is now prevented through error message M7394. The transfer of this check (Confirmation control key existing in the purchase order, see Note 589422) was necessary as otherwise you could post a purchase order as desired. (Refer to also Note 616944 -> SAPKH46C44)
    589422 Several inbound deliveries can be created with MIGO :                                                                               
    "Implement the program correction.                                       
    With Transaction SE91 create message M7394 with the message text:        
    Purchase order & & does not contain a confirmation control key".         
    After you implemented this correction, when you want to create an        
    inbound delivery with Transaction MB01 or MIGO or with                   
    BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE and if the purchase order does not contain a        
    confirmation control key the system displays error message M7394         
    "Purchase order & & does not contain a confirmation control key".                                                                               
    Hope this can explain the error you met.
    Regards,
    Mauro

  • Selected model does not contain any target value prior

    Hi ODM experts,
    I have tried to apply the SVM alg in order to find anomalous records.The table source have rows like that:
    uniq_rec ID NAME A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 data
    577     2052956018     NAMEHDRCP8     2.27     0.4     85.46     0.01     14.54     24-JAN-13
    578     1250914484     NAMEDJDRVP3     11.45     1.24     56.24     0.01     43.77     24-JAN-13
    579     1968689283     NAMEDKEND12     0.000011     6.78     0.000029     0.01     0.091     24-JAN-13
    580     2063389130     NAMEDNMXG14     0.000011     0.65     36.65     0.02     0.091     24-JAN-13
    unq_rec is the pk, id is the id for the generic name and A1 .. A5 attributes ,data when collection occur etc
    I'm trying to execute the following code:
    drop table ALG_SET;
    exec dbms_data_mining.drop_model('SVMODEL');
    create table ALG_SET (setting_name varchar2(30), setting_value varchar2(4000));
    insert into ALG_SET values ('ALGO_NAME','ALGO_SUPPORT_VECTOR_MACHINES');
    insert into ALG_SET values ('PREP_AUTO','ON');
    commit;
    Begin
    dbms_data_mining.create_model('SVMODEL', 'CLASSIFICATION', 'ODM_PAR_FIN_HIST', 'UNQ_CRT', null, 'ALG_SET');
    end;
    The results is the following error:ORA-40104: invalid training data for model build ( if I run the code) .If I run from graphical interface I have obtained this
    error code " Selected model does not contain any target value prior"(using the similar model - SVM for anomaly detction plus the same source table )
    Please advice what is missing or wrong and if possible how to bypass this issue.
    Thanks in advance for support.
    Best Regards,
    Bogdan

    Here is also a newer example of creating a SVM Anomaly model from ODM sample code (12.1 version but this applies to 11.2):
    Rem
    Rem $Header: rdbms/demo/dmsvodem.sql /main/6 2012/04/15 16:31:56 xbarr Exp $
    Rem
    Rem dmsvodem.sql
    Rem
    Rem Copyright (c) 2004, 2012, Oracle and/or its affiliates.
    Rem All rights reserved.
    Rem
    Rem    NAME
    Rem      dmsvodem.sql - Sample program for the DBMS_DATA_MINING package.
    Rem
    Rem    DESCRIPTION
    Rem      This script creates an anomaly detection model
    Rem      for data analysis and outlier identification using the
    Rem      one-class SVM algorithm
    Rem      and data in the SH (Sales History)schema in the RDBMS.
    Rem
    Rem    NOTES
    Rem   
    Rem
    Rem    MODIFIED   (MM/DD/YY)
    Rem    amozes      01/23/12 - updates for 12c
    Rem    xbarr       01/10/12 - add prediction_details demo
    Rem    ramkrish    06/14/07 - remove commit after settings
    Rem    ramkrish    10/25/07 - replace deprecated get_model calls with catalog
    Rem                           queries
    Rem    ktaylor     07/11/05 - minor edits to comments
    Rem    jcjeon      01/18/05 - add column format
    Rem    bmilenov    10/28/04 - bmilenov_oneclass_demo
    Rem    bmilenov    10/25/04 - Remove dbms_output statements
    Rem    bmilenov    10/22/04 - Comment revision
    Rem    bmilenov    10/20/04 - Created
    Rem
    SET serveroutput ON
    SET trimspool ON 
    SET pages 10000
    SET echo ON
    --                            SAMPLE PROBLEM
    -- Given demographics about a set of customers that are known to have
    -- an affinity card, 1) find the most atypical members of this group
    -- (outlier identification), 2) discover the common demographic
    -- characteristics of the most typical customers with affinity card,
    -- and 3) compute how typical a given new/hypothetical customer is.
    -- DATA
    -- The data for this sample is composed from base tables in the SH schema
    -- (See Sample Schema Documentation) and presented through a view:
    -- mining_data_one_class_v
    -- (See dmsh.sql for view definition).
    --                            BUILD THE MODEL
    -- Cleanup old model with the same name (if any)
    BEGIN DBMS_DATA_MINING.DROP_MODEL('SVMO_SH_Clas_sample');
    EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN NULL; END;
    -- PREPARE DATA
    -- Automatic data preparation is used.
    -- SPECIFY SETTINGS
    -- Cleanup old settings table (if any)
    BEGIN
      EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'DROP TABLE svmo_sh_sample_settings';
    EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN
      NULL;
    END;
    -- CREATE AND POPULATE A SETTINGS TABLE
    set echo off
    CREATE TABLE svmo_sh_sample_settings (
      setting_name  VARCHAR2(30),
      setting_value VARCHAR2(4000));
    set echo on
    BEGIN      
      -- Populate settings table
      -- SVM needs to be selected explicitly (default classifier: Naive Bayes)
      -- Examples of other possible overrides are:
      -- select a different rate of outliers in the data (default 0.1)
      -- (dbms_data_mining.svms_outlier_rate, ,0.05);
      -- select a kernel type (default kernel: selected by the algorithm)
      -- (dbms_data_mining.svms_kernel_function, dbms_data_mining.svms_linear);
      -- (dbms_data_mining.svms_kernel_function, dbms_data_mining.svms_gaussian);
      -- turn off active learning (enabled by default)
      -- (dbms_data_mining.svms_active_learning, dbms_data_mining.svms_al_disable);
      INSERT INTO svmo_sh_sample_settings (setting_name, setting_value) VALUES
      (dbms_data_mining.algo_name, dbms_data_mining.algo_support_vector_machines); 
      INSERT INTO svmo_sh_sample_settings (setting_name, setting_value) VALUES
      (dbms_data_mining.prep_auto, dbms_data_mining.prep_auto_on);
    END;
    -- CREATE A MODEL
    -- Build a new one-class SVM Model
    -- Note the NULL sprecification for target column name
    BEGIN
      DBMS_DATA_MINING.CREATE_MODEL(
        model_name          => 'SVMO_SH_Clas_sample',
        mining_function     => dbms_data_mining.classification,
        data_table_name     => 'mining_data_one_class_v',
        case_id_column_name => 'cust_id',
        target_column_name  => NULL,
        settings_table_name => 'svmo_sh_sample_settings');
    END;
    -- DISPLAY MODEL SETTINGS
    column setting_name format a30
    column setting_value format a30
    SELECT setting_name, setting_value
      FROM user_mining_model_settings
    WHERE model_name = 'SVMO_SH_CLAS_SAMPLE'
    ORDER BY setting_name;

  • Purchase order  does not contain a confirmation control key

    Hi expert
    I have not set any confirmation control key in Purchasare order, still at the Migo, system is showing error  at depot.
    I have check the same thing with manufacturing plant, system dont show me any error.
    Regard
    Nabil

    Hi,
    I f the confirmation control key is maintained in PUR.info record is automatically will fetch into PO though you have not selected manually in PO. The CC maintained in vendor master or PIR can copy into PO. In your case please see whether inbound delivery is needed to perform GR? CC implies many types of confirmations like order acknowledgement, advanced shipping notification or confirmation of delivery dates. Please see specifically to the error. Try to know the type confirmation system needs to post GR. Thanking you.

  • Error msg, "Maximum selection does not contain value 9999999999.

    Hi, I am getting this error wile doing Reclassification of HFM Movement.
    Error msg, "Maximum selection does not contain value 9999999999 of subassignment HFM CD2 & Asset Type "                                         
    in the Data Monitor, ( in Reclass Net Reserve). While running BCF task for a company for period 16/2009     
    Actually, We have converted the consolidation area from XX(2009) to YY(2010).
    Before this task, user has performed the balance carry forward.
    My Analysis is as follows:-
    Method Used in this Reclassification                                         
    RECYX (Reclassify HFM Movement at YE lvl 10)                                        
         TRIGGER                                   
         Items : 100-299, 9900-9999                                   
         HFM Movement Type : O200 to O300                                   
         Posting Level : 10                                   
         TARGET                                   
         Items : 100-299, 9900-9999                                   
         Move : O100C                                   
         Posting Level : 10                                   
         HFM CD2 and Asset type : Ticked                                    
    After TEST run in UCMON, the error message comes :-                                        
    The "HFM CD2 & Asset Type value 9999999999" is not maintained in Breakdown Categories Y500, Y700  etc.                                        
    Breakdown categories in Workbench                                        
    Maintained as "OPTIONAL, Initialized value allowed".                                        
    Single Selection                                         
    1A                                        
    1B                                        
    AR                                        
    GA                                        
    Default Selection                                        
    99999999999                                        
    BCS CUBE                                         
    HFM CD2 & Asset Type - coming blank               
    LOTR                                        
    HFM CD2 & Asset Type - Coming blank     
    Please help to go forward.
    In Anticipation,
    Deepankar Jain

    Thanks a lot Dan for the reply.
    Yes, the single selection is 1A, 1B etc, I agree that including this default value 9999999999 in single selection will resolve this issue, but the BREAK DOWN TYPE is OPTIONAL, that means It will also consider a blank value, right?
    Also, In the method defined for RECLASSIFICATION in workbench, in the TARGET parameters, the" HFM CD2 and Asset Type"  is blank but the "DEFAULT is TICKED" which makes it a mandatory derivation rule.
    Please correct me if I am wrong.
    Your replies on it are highly appreciated.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Deepankar

  • Maximum selection does not contain value 600 of subassignment Subitem-error

    Hi All,
    I'm getting the following error when i tried to load the file through data stream.
    Maximum selection does not contain value 600 of subassignment Subitem
    Message no. UCD1038
    Diagnosis
    The posting item 11100100 has breakdown category BR01 for which a maximum selection was maintained for subassignment Subitem. The current posting value, however, is not in this maximum selection.
    System Response
    The posting is not possible.
    Procedure
    Check the maximum selection and the posting.
    I have already refered the earlier threads but its of no use for me. I have checked my setting w.r.t to FS item breakdown category, Max selection in breakdown category and  sub items all the setting are fine, even i applied the OSS notes no-1074599 still i'm facing the same issue.
    Can any one help me with this regards, thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Magesh

    Hi Dan,
    Yes, breakdown category has been assigned with a sub item category which in turn assigned to subitems and this sub item is a part of the sub item category which is assigned in max. selection.
    Let me know if you want any more information on the same.
    Regards,
    Magesh

  • Constant PCORP for Ledger !* does not contain any value

    Dear SAP Guru's,
    I have a user attempting to process a credit memo via t-code FB75 and is receiving the following error message while attempting to post the transaction.
    Constant PCORP for Ledger !* does not contain any value
    The user was able to post to other customer accounts but this one.  The customer master looks fine. 
    POINTS AWARDED.
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    Pls go to the following path
    GL accounting(new)-business transaction-Doument Spiltting-Activate doument spiltting.
    Praobaly you would have chosen the standary a/c assignment check box and constant.
    That's y this error occured even i have got same error and it resolved now.

  • How to verify that the variable "does not contain" a value?

    Hi
    I am using CP 7.0.1.237.
    We want to use Text Area widget for a custom quiz and verify an answer. While we figured out how to verify the existence of certain keywords, we are not able to figure out how to verify that the content should NOT contain certain keywords. For example, we want to ensure that the text entered in this widget should not contain "Transformation" and "Non-compliant".
    Is this possible at all?
    Thanks
    Sreekanth

    Here's what the solution might look like in JavaScript.  This would be for SWF output and aimed at Cp 7.  For Cp 8, this would still work for SWF output, but you'd probably want to take advantage of the new unified JS API that gets and sets Cp variables for both SWF and HTML5 output.  You can read more about that here:  Common JS interface
    //Get the text area value from Captivate (SWF output Only)
    var cpTextAreaValue = document.Captivate.cpEIGetValue('m_VarHandle.v_TextArea);
    //convert the value to lower case to properly compare
    cpTextAreaValue = cpTextAreaValue.toLowerCase();
    //Check if text area value contains the words "transformation" or "non-compliant"
    if(cpTextAreaValue.indexof('organizational') > -1 && cpTextAreaValue.indexof('behavioral ') > -1 && cpTextAreaValue.indexof('managerial') > -1 && cpTextAreaValue.indexof('transformation') < 0 && cpTextAreaValue.indexof('non-compliant') < 0){
      //the text area has the correct answer so increment varScore
      //get the current score from Captivate
      var score = document.Captivate.cpEIGetValue('m_VarHandle.varScore');
      //increment score by 1
      score++;
      //set score in Captivate
      document.Captivate.cpEISetValue('m_VarHandle.varScore', score);
    } else {
      //the text area does not have the correct answer so show message to user inside of Captivate
      document.Captivate.cpEISetValue('m_VarHandle.v_message', 'Answer is not correct');
    This JS has not been tested.  Note that the "does not contain" operator is done using the "indexof" operator in JS. 
    Jim Leichliter

  • Document does not contain selectable items.

    Hello Gurus,
    My purchase team wanted to transfer plant from one plant to other.. and so they are creating STO , without any confirmation , while doing GRN 101 movement type Store person is facing error Document does not contain selectable items.
    Please help to resolve the same.

    Hi,
    1) this should be posted in MM forum, not here
    2) let the person go to MIGO , to menu Settings, click Default Values and check checkbox "Propose All Items"
    3) I guess if it is STO it would need goods issue first happening in source plant so that GR can happen in receiving plant (so first create Outbound Delivery in source plant, post goods issue against it and then do the GR with 101 against this delivery or PO itself)
    Regards,
    Tomek

Maybe you are looking for