InfoObject Help taking more time in BI web report Input screen

Hi all,
i am having a report consist of 3 variables .So, when ever i will execute it, variable screen will pop up.
Now, There is an object name as "Master Location" , and it is having variable .
Now, the problem is when i click on the help of Master Location , it will take 15-20 minutes to open the help window.
"Master Location" is the navigational attribute of the Object "Location".
Also, If i will not select the help button on the initial screen and directly executes the query and if i will open the Filter value screen for Master Location , it will open the same help window within the 3 sec.
Please suggest .
Regards,
Macwan James.

Hi,
This is usually due to some backend select statement failure ie due to inconsistencies in master data. Sometimes if you run RSRV you can fix the issue. At the worst case if you can clean up the master data and load them newly you will get this issue fixed. We have faced this where the selection screen never returned a value and clean up of master data helped us in fixing the issue.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Arun

Similar Messages

Query accessing SSAS cube is taking more time in power view report

Hi,
My SSAS server is having 16 Core's . I have created a power view in sharepoint site, which is accessing ssas cube.
The report is taking more time to show the result. I traced the DAX query using SQL Server profiler. When I ran this DAX query in SSAS server directly, then its taking less time but when the same query running from sharepoint server (power view) , it
is taking more time. Number of records in the fact table is 300M .
Also i tracked the %process time in performance monitor, mostly the line is below 20%. I think the CPU is not fully utilized..
Could you please help me to improve the performance of my report.
Regards,
Arun

Hi Arun,
According to your description, you create a PowerView report in SharePoint site connect to SSAS cube, the problem is that it take long time to show the result in the report, now you want to improve report performance, right?
In your scenario, you said that it takes more time to return the result in PowerView report than run the query directly in SSMS. For a report, its run time contain retrieval data time and render report time. So it takes more time to return the result in
PowerView report than run the query directly in SSMS. And there are 300M records in the fact table, the performance can be caused by large data. Here is a blog which describes tracks down Power View performance problems.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/psssql/archive/2013/07/29/tracking-down-power-view-performance-problems.aspx
Regards,
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

F4 help taking more time

Hello All,
While selecting vendor from variable selection screen of a query is taking lot of time and finally ends with an error message " program terminated". When i execute query and try selecting vendor from selection screen i am able to select but user is not able to select and getting the error message. Any idea why is this issue with user?
Thanks for the help!
Meghana

Meghana,
Is this in Bex analyzer or in the portal. If it is in the Bex Analyzer then once the user presses f4 a pop up comes with the values (which apparently is timing out in your case) Click on the settings button in the pop up and go to value restrictions tab and change it from all values to "maximum number of values displayed" . If it is already chosen then reduce the number to a small number. This would prevent the time out.
The downside to this is that not all values get populated in the list but the user can click on the search button and specify a pattern and search for the vendor.
Let me know if this works or you want me to explain further.

BCC push taking more time

Hi Experts,
We are using ATG 9.4 and we have around 70 thousand products, i think its not large number. but when we push projects from BCC it is taking more time.
here is my problem- we have 2 data centeres ,each data centere is having around more than 100 instances (agents) . we need to push to each data center. BCC is taking more time to push(hours). can you suggest me , what best can be done to avoid those issues. any soulution would be much appreciated
Thanks
Krish

We usually find performance problems can be traced back to the database layer.
Have you considered cleaning up the versioned schemas, either by using the OOTB purging functionality:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26180_01/Platform.94/ATGCAProgGuide/html/s1301purgingassetversions01.html
or a complete rebaselining of your Publishing environment
For the two data centres you may want to consider using a product like GoldenGate
FAQ: Using Oracle GoldenGate with Oracle Commerce (Doc ID 1670439.1)
https://support.oracle.com/rs?type=doc&id=1670439.1
Whitepaper: Oracle ATG Web Commerce Maximum Availability Architecture (MAA) on Exadata and Exalogic (Doc ID 1590928.1)
https://support.oracle.com/rs?type=doc&id=1590928.1
++++
Thanks
Gareth
Please mark any update as "Correct Answer" or "Helpful Answer" if that update helps/answers your question, so that
others can identify the Correct/helpful update between many updates.

CDP Performance Issue-- Taking more time fetch data

Hi,
I'm working on Stellent 7.5.1.
For one of the portlet in portal its taking more time to fetch data. Please can some one help me to solve this issue.. So that performance can be improved.. Please kindly provide me solution.. This is my code for fetching data from the server....
public void getManager(final HashMap binderMap)
throws VistaInvalidInputException, VistaDataNotFoundException,
DataException, ServiceException, VistaTemplateException
     String collectionID =
getStringLocal(VistaFolderConstants.FOLDER_ID_KEY);
     long firstStartTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
HashMap resultSetMap = null;
String isNonRecursive = getStringLocal(VistaFolderConstants
.ISNONRECURSIVE_KEY);
if (isNonRecursive != null
&& isNonRecursive.equalsIgnoreCase(
VistaContentFetchHelperConstants.STRING_TRUE))
VistaLibraryContentFetchManager libraryContentFetchManager =
new VistaLibraryContentFetchManager(
binderMap);
SystemUtils.trace(
VistaContentFetchHelperConstants.CONTENT_FETCH_TRACE,
"The input Parameters for Content Fetch = "
+ binderMap);
          resultSetMap = libraryContentFetchManager
.getFolderContentItems(m_workspace);
* used to add the resultset to the binder.
addResultSetToBinder(resultSetMap , true);
else
     long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
* isStandard is used to decide the call is for Standard or
* Extended.
SystemUtils.trace(
VistaContentFetchHelperConstants.CONTENT_FETCH_TRACE,
"The input Parameters for Content Fetch = "
+ binderMap);
String isStandard = getTemplateInformation(binderMap);
long endTimeTemplate = System.currentTimeMillis();
binderMap.put(VistaFolderConstants.IS_STANDARD,
isStandard);
long endTimebinderMap = System.currentTimeMillis();
VistaContentFetchManager contentFetchManager
= new VistaContentFetchManager(binderMap);
long endTimeFetchManager = System.currentTimeMillis();
resultSetMap = contentFetchManager
.getAllFolderContentItems(m_workspace);
long endTimeresultSetMap = System.currentTimeMillis();
* used to add the resultset and the total no of content items
* to the binder.
addResultSetToBinder(resultSetMap , false);
long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
if (perfLogEnable.equalsIgnoreCase("true"))
     Log.info("Time taken to execute " +
               "getTemplateInformation=" +
               (endTimeTemplate - startTime)+
               "ms binderMap=" +
               (endTimebinderMap - startTime)+
               "ms contentFetchManager=" +
               (endTimeFetchManager - startTime)+
               "ms resultSetMap=" +
               (endTimeresultSetMap - startTime) +
               "ms getManager:getAllFolderContentItems = " +
               (endTime - startTime) +
               "ms overallTime=" +
               (endTime - firstStartTime) +
               "ms folderID =" +
               collectionID);
Edited by: 838623 on Feb 22, 2011 1:43 AM

Hi.
The Select statment accessing MSEG Table is Slow Many a times.
To Improve the performance of MSEG.
1.Check for the proper notes in the Service Market Place if you are working for CIN version.
2.Index the MSEG table
2.Check and limit the Columns in the Select statment .
Possible Way.
SELECT MBLNR MJAHR ZEILE BWART MATNR WERKS LIFNR MENGE MEINS
EBELN EBELP LGORT SMBLN BUKRS GSBER INSMK XAUTO
FROM MSEG
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE ITAB
WHERE WERKS EQ P_WERKS AND
MBLNR IN S_MBLNR AND
BWART EQ '105' .
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002361303'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003501080'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002996300'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002996407'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003587026'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003587026'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003493186'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002720583'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002928122'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002628263'.
Select
Regards
Bala.M
Edited by: Bala Malvatu on Feb 7, 2008 9:18 PM

Report rdf with size 8mb taking more time to open

Hello All,
I have a rdf ( reports 6i) report with size 8.5mb taking more time to open and more time to access each field.
Please let me know how do i solve this issue.
Please do the needful.
Thanks.

Thanks for immediate response.
pls let me know how do i know this.
Right now i have the below details from report->help
Report Builder 6.0.8.11.3
ORACLE Server Release 8.0.6.0.0
Oracle Procedure Builder 6.0.8.11.0
Oracle ORACLE PL/SQL V8.0.6.0.0 - Production
Oracle CORE Version 4.0.6.0.0 - Production
Oracle Tools Integration Services 6.0.8.10.2
Oracle Tools Common Area 6.0.5.32.1
Oracle Toolkit 2 for Windows 32-bit platforms 6.0.5.35.0
Resource Object Store 6.0.5.0.1
Oracle Help 6.0.5.35.0
Oracle Sqlmgr 6.0.8.11.3
Oracle Query Builder 6.0.7.0.0 - Production
PL/SQL Editor (c) WinMain Software (www.winmain.com), v1.0 (Production)
Oracle ZRC 6.0.8.11.3
Oracle Express 6.0.8.3.5
Oracle XML Parser 1.0.2.1.0 Production
Oracle Virtual Graphics System 6.0.5.35.0
Oracle Image 6.0.5.34.0
Oracle Multimedia Widget 6.0.5.34.0
Oracle Tools GUI Utilities 6.0.5.35.0
Thanks
Edited by: Abdul Khan on Jan 26, 2010 11:54 PM

XML Publisher(XDODTEXE) in EBS taking more time with the same SQL in TOAD

HI
XML Publisher(XDODTEXE) in EBS taking more time with the same SQL in TOAD.
The sql has 5 union clauses.
It takes 20-30 minutes in TOAD compared to running through Concurrent Program in XML Publisher in EBS taking around 4-5 hours.
The Scalable Flag at report level is turned on with the JVM options set to -Xmx1024m -Xmx1024m in Concurrent Program definition.
Other configurations for Data Template like XSLT, Scalable, Optimization are turned on though didn't bounce the OPP Server for these to take effect as I am not sure whether it is needed.
Thanks in advance for your help.

But the question is that how come it is working in TOAD and takes only 15-20 minutes?
with initialization of session ?
what about sqlplus ?
Do I have to set up the the temp directory for the XML Publisher report to make it faster?
look at
R12: Troubleshooting Known XML Publisher and E-Business Suite (EBS) Integration Issues (Doc ID 1410160.1)
BI Publisher - Troubleshooting Oracle Business Intelligence (XML) Publisher For The Oracle E-Business Suite (Doc ID 364547.1)

Post Goods Issue (VL06O) - taking more time approximate 30 to 45 minutes

Dear Sir,
While doing post goods issue against delivery document system is taking lots of time, this issue is very very urgent can any one resolved or provide suitable solution for solving this issue.
We creates every day approximate 160 sales order / delivery and goods issue against the same by using transaction code VL06O system is taking more time for PGI.
Kindly provide suitable solution for the same.
Regards,
Vijay Sanguri

Hi
See Note 113048 - Collective note on delivery monitor and search notes related with performance.
Do a trace with tcode ST05 (look for help from a basis consultant) and search the bottleneck. Search possible sources of performance problems in userexits, enhancements and so on.
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

INSTR() function is taking more time

im using the below query select query in my procedure.
select distinct SUPPLIER_CIRCUIT_ID from SUPPLIER_DATA
where INSTR(i.SYSTEM_CIRCUIT_ID,SUPPLIER_CIRCUIT_ID) > 0;
I am taking SYSTEM_CIRCUIT_ID in cursor.
This query is taking more time. Is that possiblt to create function based index and speed up the query?

Hi,
Welcome to the forum!
993620 wrote:
im using the below query select query in my procedure.
select distinct SUPPLIER_CIRCUIT_ID from SUPPLIER_DATA
where INSTR(i.SYSTEM_CIRCUIT_ID,SUPPLIER_CIRCUIT_ID) > 0;
I am taking SYSTEM_CIRCUIT_ID in cursor.Show exactly what you're doing.
Whenever you have a problem, post a complete test script that people can run to re-create the problem and test their ideas.
See te forum FAQ {message:id=9360002}
This query is taking more time. Is that possiblt to create function based index and speed up the query?Sorry, unless you doing something very specific (such as alwyas looking for the same sub-string) then a function-based index won't help.
Oracle sells a separate product, called Oracle Text, for this kind of searching.
You might try LIKE:
WHERE i.SYSTEM_CIRCUIT_ID LIKE '%' || SUPPLIER_CIRCUIT_ID || '%'If you're using a cursor, then that's probably slowing the process down much more than the part you're showing.

Log applying service is taking more time in phy. Standby

Hi Gurus,
My Database version as follows
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
We have datagaurd setup as well - Huge archive logs are generating in our primary database - Archive logs are shipping to standby with no dealy - But applying the archive logs are taking more in our physical standby database - Can you please help me why it was taking more time to apply archivlogs (sync) in standby ? - What could be possible reasons..?
Note : Size of standby redo logs are same as redo log file of primary database - Also standy by redo one or more than online redo log primary.
I also confirmed from network guy for network issue - He said that network is good.
Please let me know if any other information required? - Since i need to report my higer leve stating this is cause for delay in applying archive logs.
Thanks

No we don't have delay option in log_archive_dest
here is alert log
edia Recovery Waiting for thread 1 sequence 42017 (in transit)
Thu Sep 19 09:00:09 2013
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 6 Seq 42017 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0: /xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0601.log
Mem# 1: /xyz/u200/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0601.log
Thu Sep 19 09:00:49 2013
RFS[1]: Successfully opened standby log 5: '/xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log'
Thu Sep 19 09:00:54 2013
Primary database is in MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE mode
RFS[2]: Successfully opened standby log 7: '/xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0701.log'
Thu Sep 19 09:00:58 2013
Media Recovery Waiting for thread 1 sequence 42018 (in transit)
Thu Sep 19 09:00:58 2013
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 5 Seq 42018 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0: /xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log
Mem# 1: /xyz/u200/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log
Media Recovery Waiting for thread 1 sequence 42019 (in transit)
Thu Sep 19 09:01:08 2013
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 7 Seq 42019 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0: /xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0701.log
Mem# 1: /xyz/u200/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0701.log
Thu Sep 19 09:01:08 2013
RFS[1]: Successfully opened standby log 5: '/xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log'
Thu Sep 19 09:01:22 2013
Primary database is in MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE mode
RFS[2]: Successfully opened standby log 6: '/xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0601.log'
Thu Sep 19 09:01:26 2013
RFS[1]: Successfully opened standby log 5: '/xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log'
Thu Sep 19 09:01:26 2013
Media Recovery Log /xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/arch/ARCH1_42020_821334023.LOG
Media Recovery Waiting for thread 1 sequence 42021 (in transit)
Thu Sep 19 09:01:30 2013
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 5 Seq 42021 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0: /xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log
Mem# 1: /xyz/u200/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log
Thu Sep 19 09:01:51 2013
Media Recovery Waiting for thread 1 sequence 42022 (in transit)
Thu Sep 19 09:01:51 2013
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 6 Seq 42022 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0: /xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0601.log
Mem# 1: /xyz/u200/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0601.log
Thu Sep 19 09:01:57 2013
Primary database is in MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE mode
RFS[2]: Successfully opened standby log 5: '/xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log'
Thu Sep 19 09:02:01 2013
Media Recovery Waiting for thread 1 sequence 42023 (in transit)
Thu Sep 19 09:02:01 2013
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 5 Seq 42023 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0: /xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log
Mem# 1: /xyz/u200/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log

Select query taking more time..

Hi friends..
The below inner join statement is taking more time , can any body sugget me to improve the performance . I tried FOR ALL ENTRIES also but that also taking more time than inner join statement .
SELECT a~vbeln from vbap as a inner join vakpa as b
      on avbeln = bvbeln
      into corresponding fields of table IT_VAKPA
      where a~WERKS IN S_IWERKS
      and a~pstyv NE 'ZRS'
      and b~vkorg = IVKORG
      and b~audat IN IAUDAT
      and b~vtweg IN IVTWEG.
Regards
Chetan

Hi Chetan ,
VAKPA is an index table. From the select query , it has been observed that you are not fetching any data from VAKPA. Only you have added some selection paramenters in where clause of select query.
My suggestion will be instead of using VAKPA in inner join you use VBAK along with VBAP. All the fields that you are using as selection condition from VAKPA are there in VBAK.
I am sure performance of query will be improved.
If still duo to business logic you need to use VAKPA, try to create secondary non unique index on fields VKORD,AUDATand VTWEG on table VAKPA.
However I will recommend you to go for first option only. If this does not work then go for second option.
Hopfully this will help you.
Regards,
Nikhil

BSAD table is taking more time in select query.

Hi ,
The below SELECT query is taking more time , there is no any secondary index is there .
Can anybody suggest how to improve it .
SELECT bukrs
         kunnr
         augdt
         augbl
         gjahr
         belnr
         budat
         bldat
         waers
         xblnr
         BLART
         monat
         shkzg
         gsber
         DMBTR
         WRBTR
         prctr
         FROM BSAD INTO TABLE gt_bsad
         WHERE bukrs = p_bukrs
         AND    kunnr IN so_kunnr
         AND    budat IN so_budat
         AND    xblnr IN so_xblnr
         AND ( blart EQ 'DA' OR
                blart EQ 'DZ' OR
                blart EQ 'ZP' OR               "D03K904574
                blart EQ 'KZ' OR               "D03K904574
                blart EQ 'DP' )
         AND   PRCTR IN R_PC.
Thanks in advance
Regards
chetan

Hi Chetan ,
I will suggest you two things :
1. Try to add Secondary ( Non-unique) index on table BSAD with fields : mandt,bukrs,kunnr,budat,xblnr,blart,prctr.
    but before adding this index test the selectivity of this index by going to Tcode DB05
2. In the select query you have used OR condition for blart. Instead of this try to create a ranges table for blart and append the values 'DA','DZ','ZP','KZ','DP' and use this in the select query. This will improve the performance for sure.
Hope this will help to ypu.
Regards,
Nikhil

Taking more time for retreving data from nested table

Hi
we have two databases db1 and db2,in database db2 we have number of nested tables were there.
Now the problem is we had link between two databases,whenever u firing the any query in db1 internally it's going to acces nested tables in db2.
For feching records it's going to take much more time even records are less in table . what would be the reason.
plz help me daliy we are facing the problem regarding the same

Please avoid duplicate thread :
quaries taking more time
Nicolas.
+< mod. action : thread locked>+

Taking More Time while inserting into the table (With foriegn key)

Hi All,
I am facing problem while inserting the values into the master table.
The problem,
Table A -- User Master Table (Reg No, Name, etc)
Table B -- Transaction Table (Foreign key reference with Table A).
While inserting the data's in Table B, i need to insert the reg no also in table B which is mandatory. I followed the logic which is mentioned in the SRDemo.
While inserting we need to query the Table A first to have the values in TableABean.java.
final TableA tableA= (TableA )uow.executeQuery("findUser",TableA .class, regNo);
Then, we need to create the instance for TableB
TableB tableB= (TableB)uow.newInstance(TableB.class);
tableB.setID(bean.getID);
tableA.addTableB(tableB); --- this is for to insert the regNo of TableA in TableB.. This line is executing the query "select * from TableB where RegNo = <tableA.getRegNo>".
This query is taking too much time if values are more in the TableB for that particular registrationNo. Because of this its taking more time to insert into the TableB.
For Ex: TableA -- regNo : 101...having less entry in TableB means...inserting record is taking less than 1 sec
regNo : 102...having more entry in TableB means...inserting record is taking more than 2 sec
Time delay is there for different users when they enter transaction in TableB.
I need to avoid this since in future it will take more time...from 2 sec to 10 sec, if volume of data increases mean.
Please help me to resolve this issue...I am facing it now in production.
Thanks & Regards
VB

Hello,
Looks like you have a 1:M relationship from TableA to TableB, with a 1:1 back pointer from TableB to TableA. If triggering the 1:M relationship is causing you delays that you want to avoid there might be two quick ways I can see:
1) Don't map it. Leave the TableA->TableB 1:M unmapped, and instead just query for relationship when you do need it. This means you do not need to call tableA.addTableB(tableB), and instead only need to call tableB.setTableA(tableA), so that the TableB->TableA relation gets set. Might not be the best option, but it depends on your application's usage. It does allow you to potentially page the TableB results or add other query query performance options when you do need the data though.
2) You are currently using Lazy loading for the TableA->TableB relationship - if it is untriggered, don't bother calling tableA.addTableB(tableB), and instead only need to call tableB.setTableA(tableA). This of course requires using TopLink api to a) verify the collection is an IndirectCollection type, and b) that it is hasn't been triggered. If it has been triggered, you will still need to call tableA.addTableB(tableB), but it won't result in a query. Check out the oracle.toplink.indirection.IndirectContainer class and it's isInstantiated() method. This can cause problems though in highly concurrent environments, as other threads may have triggered the indirection before you commit your transaction, so that the A->B collection is not up to date - this might require refreshing the TableA if so.
Change tracking would probably be the best option to use here, and is described in the EclipseLink wiki:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Introduction_to_EclipseLink_Transactions_(ELUG)#Attribute_Change_Tracking_Policy
Best Regards,
Chris

Query is taking more time to execute

Hi,
Query is taking more time to execute.
But when i execute same query in other server then it is giving immediate output.
What is the reason of it.
thanks in advance.

'My car doesn't start, please help me to start my car'
Do you think we are clairvoyant?
Or is your salary subtracted for every letter you type here?
Please be aware this is not a chatroom, and we can not see your webcam.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

InfoObject Help taking more time in BI web report Input screen

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for