InfoPath Domain Permission Level error. See description.
I am on a temporary assignment. For this assignment I made a form in InfoPath, submitted on SharePoint. Everything works as expected on SharePoint. After I move on from this assignment to the next, the owner of the SharePoint need to have
access to InfoPath form. I mean, if he wants to edit the form, or work on the form, he should be able to do it. When i emailed him the InfoPath form, he was unable to open the form with the following error message:
"Forms that require the domain permission level contain features that access information on a network, such as data connections, linked images, and code."
Please help!!
Hi,
Try couple of things:
1. Tell the other person to not open the form directly but right click and select Design. This should open the form in design mode. The other person should have InfoPath installed on their local machine.
2. If you have created any Data Connection in the form, then it might not open as stand alone and the others will be able to open it from the Library where it is published.
3. You should also check the settings, where the form is Browser enabled or not? If you try to open just by clicking on the form, it will try to open in local machine rather than browser.
Similar issue is stated here:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/7d937195-24df-40a7-97eb-b40c551ae3d3/users-cant-open-form-because-it-requires-domain-permission-level?forum=sharepointcustomizationlegacy
Regards, Kapil ***Please mark answer as Helpful or Answered after consideration***
Similar Messages
-
Hi i have that error in my Domain Controller. Install Windows
Server 2012 R2, and I want to raise the functional level.
This Domain Controller no longer exists,
but is within the domain.
To update the domain functional level, the Active Directory Domain Controllers in the domain must be running the appropriate version of windows.
domain Name
xxxxxx.local
Current domain functional level
Windows Server 2008
The following Active Directory Domain Controllers are running earlier versions of windows:
domain Name AD DC Version of Windows
xxxxxxx.local server.xxxxxx.local Windows Server® 2008 Standard 6.0 (6001)
that I can
do?it might be in the "LostAndFoundConfig" container in the Configuration partition.
Something like this should be logged:
Event Type: Warning
Event Source: NTDS General
Event Category: Directory Access
Event ID: 1723
Date: 6/4/2005
Time: 7:39:52 AM
User: NTDEV\A1ADCH
Computer: NTDEV-DC-07
Description:
Active Directory failed to raise the functional level of the domain or forest
because the following domain controller is at a lower functional level.
Object (forest or domain):
DC=ntdev,dc=corp,DC=microsoft,DC=com
NTDS Settings object of domain controller:
CN=NTDS Settings,CN=LostAndFoundConfig,CN=Configuration,DC=ntdev,DC=corp,DC=com
For more information, see Help and Support Center at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
Delete the 'NTDSA' object from the "LostAndFoundConfig" container using ADSIEdit.
Enfo Zipper
Christoffer Andersson – Principal Advisor
http://blogs.chrisse.se - Directory Services Blog -
Log Name: Application
Source: Application Hang
Date: 17-Nov-14 14:50:41
Event ID: 1002
Task Category: (101)
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: PC
Description:
The program wwahost.exe version 6.3.9600.17031 stopped interacting with Windows and was closed. To see if more information about the problem is available, check the problem history in the Action Center control panel.
Process ID: 186c
Start Time: 01d00265068ca045
Termination Time: 4294967295
Application Path: C:\WINDOWS\syswow64\wwahost.exe
Report Id: 5198babb-6e58-11e4-bec8-689423cdeae2
Faulting package full name: Microsoft.SkypeApp_3.1.0.1005_x86__kzf8qxf38zg5c
Faulting package-relative application ID: App
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="Application Hang" />
<EventID Qualifiers="0">1002</EventID>
<Level>2</Level>
<Task>101</Task>
<Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2014-11-17T12:50:41.000000000Z" />
<EventRecordID>39947</EventRecordID>
<Channel>Application</Channel>
<Computer>PC</Computer>
<Security />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data>wwahost.exe</Data>
<Data>6.3.9600.17031</Data>
<Data>186c</Data>
<Data>01d00265068ca045</Data>
<Data>4294967295</Data>
<Data>C:\WINDOWS\syswow64\wwahost.exe</Data>
<Data>5198babb-6e58-11e4-bec8-689423cdeae2</Data>
<Data>Microsoft.SkypeApp_3.1.0.1005_x86__kzf8qxf38zg5c</Data>
<Data>App</Data>
<Binary>430072006F00730073002D00700072006F00630065007300730000000000</Binary>
</EventData>
</Event>You forgot to tell us what is going on. What is the problem?
-
Hi All,
While opening a saved for later notification, we are getting "The selected action is not available. The cause may be related to security. Contact your system administrator to verify your permission level for this action". error.
This is a custom notification.
Please help.
Thanks
RaghavaHI All,
Please help on this issue.
Thanks
Raghava -
Error in SharePoint hosted app: Add permission level to the list programmatically
I am trying to add permission to the list which I have created in my app. I am trying to give current user some permission to add update delete items from my list. I have used one article from MSDN(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/jj247079.aspx)
site. And my code is as bellow:
function execOperation() {
debugger;
context = new SP.ClientContext(appweburl);
var factory =
new SP.ProxyWebRequestExecutorFactory(
appweburl
context.set_webRequestExecutorFactory(factory);
appContextSite = new SP.AppContextSite(context, appweburl);
var appContextSite2 = new SP.AppContextSite(context, hostweburl);
var siteColl = appContextSite2.get_site();
hostweb = appContextSite2.get_web();
context.load(hostweb);
web = appContextSite.get_web();
context.load(web);
user = web.get_currentUser();
context.load(user);
que_list = web.get_lists().getByTitle("MyList1");
context.load(que_list);
que_list.breakRoleInheritance(true, true);
var permissions = new SP.BasePermissions();
permissions.set(SP.PermissionKind.viewListItems);
permissions.set(SP.PermissionKind.addListItems);
permissions.set(SP.PermissionKind.editListItems);
permissions.set(SP.PermissionKind.deleteListItems);
// Create a new role definition.
var roleDefinitionCreationInfo = new SP.RoleDefinitionCreationInformation();
roleDefinitionCreationInfo.set_name('Manage List Items');
roleDefinitionCreationInfo.set_description('Allows a user to manage list items');
roleDefinitionCreationInfo.set_basePermissions(permissions);
var roleDefinition = web.get_roleDefinitions().add(roleDefinitionCreationInfo);
web.breakRoleInheritance(true, false);
// Create a new RoleDefinitionBindingCollection.
var newBindings = SP.RoleDefinitionBindingCollection.newObject(context);
// Add the role to the collection.
newBindings.add(roleDefinition);
// Get the RoleAssignmentCollection for the target list.
var assignments = que_list.get_roleAssignments();
que_list.breakRoleInheritance(true, true);
// Add the user to the target list and assign the use to the new RoleDefinitionBindingCollection.
var roleAssignment = assignments.add(web.get_currentUser(), newBindings);
context.executeQueryAsync(onSuccess, onFail);
I have just copied the code from that article. But when I run my app it give me error :
You cannot customize permission levels in a web site with inherited permission levels
Any suggestions, What am I doing wrong?
Thank you in advance...!Problem solved.
It turns out there should be NO leading '/' in the relative URL despite the example shown in http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/dn292553.aspx#Folders with "/Shared Folder".
The correct GetFolderByServerRelativeUrl-parameter in my case is 'Lists/Productdocuments'.
Unsure whether example is wrong or if it applies to other cases than mine. -
Hello, I get the below error when I start iCal and it tries to sync with my Yahoo Calendar. Any thoughts?
There was an unexpected error with the request (domain CalDAVErrorDomain / error 1 / description 'The collection at "/dav/xyx/Inbox/" is not an inbox.').I am having same problem - I've added events to Ical and it's not updating in my Yahoo calendar. Getting this message: There was an unexpected error with the request (domain CalDAVErrorDomain / error 1 / description 'The collection at "/dav/mcarthur_c/Inbox/" is not an inbox.').
-
RAR - Risk Analysis - Permission Level - V_VBAK_AAT||AUART - Error
I have a trouble related with risk analysis at permission level, when the V_VBAK_AAT||AUART is activated in two functions of my customized GRC rule-set (VIRSA_CC_FUNCPRM) for controlling some "document types" for tcodes VA01 and VA02. When I execute this customization in RAR, the system says "No match / No conflicts" for the risks where these functions appear, however performing some queries in the back-end systems, I have realized there are more than 80 users in conflict for some of them, given the fact that they have value '*' in object/field V_VBAK_AAT||AUART.
At a first time I thought that most probably would be related with the fact that these functions are part of risks that combine 3 and 4 functions at the same time, with OR logical activated in document types, but when I searched for the rules generated for these risks I noticed that only 34.000 rules were generated and this no overpass the limit of 45566 rules defined at RAR. Anyway, I performed some tests reducing the number of possible combinations and, basically, whenever the following line is activated, the outcome is u201Cno conflictsu201D:
D VIRSA_CC_FUNCPRM FN15 VA01 GRC-C21 V_VBAK_AAT||AUART ZSO ZSO OR 0 null
If this line is disabled, then, several users with conflicts are reported. As mentioned above, these users have value '*' for object/field V_VBAK_AAT||AUART, so I do not understand why those users are not reported when the line above is activated.
I have done the following checks, all of them correct:
- The user/role/profile synchro has been done and all the users has been stored in table VIRSA_CC_
- All the lines in VIRSA_CC_FUNCPRM part of my customized rule-set have been correctly inserted in the same Oracle table
- All the combinations of rules has been created (including VA01 and VA02 with V_VBAK_AAT||AUART)
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advanceI've detected the same problem for the following authorization objects:
- F_BKPF_BLA||BRGRU
- V_VBRK_FKA||FKART
- M_MSEG_BWE||WERKS
RAR reports no conflicts (at authoriztion level) when these objects are activated (of course having users with these conflicts in back-end systems)
This problem has been proved in the installation of different customer with SAP GRC Access Control 5.3 SP12.
Anybody else has experienced this issue???? -
Event ID 10016 - DCOM Error | Source - Microsoft-Windows-DistributedCOM | Level: Error
Hi there... I am getting the above mentioned error with the
Description: dows-DistributedCOM cannot be found. Either the component that raises this event is not installed on your local computer or the installation is corrupted. You can install or repair the component on the local computer.
Full message is -
Log Name: System
Source: Microsoft-Windows-DistributedCOM
Date: 5/15/2012 1:18:44 PM
Event ID: 10016
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: NT AUTHORITY\IUSR
Computer: Server.domain.com
Description:
The description for Event ID 10016 from source Microsoft-Windows-DistributedCOM cannot be found. Either the component that raises this event is not installed on your local computer or the installation is corrupted. You can install or repair the component on
the local computer.
If the event originated on another computer, the display information had to be saved with the event.
The following information was included with the event:
application-specific
Local
Activation
{2D527A8C-A4B6-4E74-A63F-E867360D401C}
{B13EFBAE-7504-4938-9ED7-8E8B53E51221}
NT AUTHORITY
IUSR
S-1-5-17
LocalHost (Using LRPC)
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="Microsoft-Windows-DistributedCOM" Guid="{1B562E86-B7AA-4131-BADC-B6F3A001407E}" EventSourceName="DCOM" />
<EventID Qualifiers="49152">10016</EventID>
<Version>0</Version>
<Level>2</Level>
<Task>0</Task>
<Opcode>0</Opcode>
<Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2012-05-15T19:18:44.000000000Z" />
<EventRecordID>43121</EventRecordID>
<Correlation />
<Execution ProcessID="0" ThreadID="0" />
<Channel>System</Channel>
<Computer>Server.Domain.com</Computer>
<Security UserID="S-1-5-17" />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data Name="param1">application-specific</Data>
<Data Name="param2">Local</Data>
<Data Name="param3">Activation</Data>
<Data Name="param4">{2D527A8C-A4B6-4E74-A63F-E867360D401C}</Data>
<Data Name="param5">{B13EFBAE-7504-4938-9ED7-8E8B53E51221}</Data>
<Data Name="param6">NT AUTHORITY</Data>
<Data Name="param7">IUSR</Data>
<Data Name="param8">S-1-5-17</Data>
<Data Name="param9">LocalHost (Using LRPC)</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
Please let me know any solutions to fix....
Steps, I did try from one of the blogs -
Open Component Services. Got oStart --> Control Panel --> Administrative Tools --> Components Services. Expand the Component Services branch then expand Computers, My Computer and DCOM Config. Right-click on "sms agent host" (my case) and click
Properties. Click on the Security tab and under “Launch and Activation Permissions” select "edit" and add user Local Service (Local lunch). Click OK, close the Component Services window.
In the Launch Permission dialog box, make sure that the Everyone group has Remote Launch and Remote Activation permissions.
In the Launch Permission dialog box, make sure that the SMS Reporting Users local group has following permissions:
Local Launch / Remote Launch / Local Activation / Remote Activation
Also added Remote Launch / Remote Activation permission for Network Service (for the SMS_Reporting_Point)
Added Admin Group to the "ConfigMgr Remote Control Users"
VTIn addition, In the security policy the ‘Local Service’ need to be configured for the following Policies
- Generate security audits
- Create global objects
- Replace a process level token
- Adjust memory quotas for a process
- Impersonate a client after authentication
- Log on as a service
- Bypass traverse checking
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Yan Li
hi,
i m having similiar error but with another APPID
i did what u said in 1st part but i couldnt get what u mean in additional settings ? i couldnt do that.
Error details :
Log Name: System
Source: Microsoft-Windows-DistributedCOM
Date: 7/2/2013 4:03:20 PM
Event ID: 10016
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: LOCAL SERVICE
Computer: THINK
Description:
The machine-default permission settings do not grant Local Activation permission for the COM Server application with CLSID
{7160A13D-73DA-4CEA-95B9-37356478588A}
and APPID
{7160A13D-73DA-4CEA-95B9-37356478588A}
to the user NT AUTHORITY\LOCAL SERVICE SID (S-1-5-19) from address LocalHost (Using LRPC) running in the application container Unavailable SID (Unavailable). This security permission can be modified using the Component Services administrative tool.
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="Microsoft-Windows-DistributedCOM" Guid="{1B562E86-B7AA-4131-BADC-B6F3A001407E}" EventSourceName="DCOM" />
<EventID Qualifiers="0">10016</EventID>
<Version>0</Version>
<Level>2</Level>
<Task>0</Task>
<Opcode>0</Opcode>
<Keywords>0x8080000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2013-02-07T14:03:20.356793400Z" />
<EventRecordID>1465</EventRecordID>
<Correlation />
<Execution ProcessID="868" ThreadID="2832" />
<Channel>System</Channel>
<Computer>THINK</Computer>
<Security UserID="S-1-5-19" />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data Name="param1">machine-default</Data>
<Data Name="param2">Local</Data>
<Data Name="param3">Activation</Data>
<Data Name="param4">{7160A13D-73DA-4CEA-95B9-37356478588A}</Data>
<Data Name="param5">{7160A13D-73DA-4CEA-95B9-37356478588A}</Data>
<Data Name="param6">NT AUTHORITY</Data>
<Data Name="param7">LOCAL SERVICE</Data>
<Data Name="param8">S-1-5-19</Data>
<Data Name="param9">LocalHost (Using LRPC)</Data>
<Data Name="param10">Unavailable</Data>
<Data Name="param11">Unavailable</Data>
</EventData>
</Event> -
Custom permission levels don't work
I have created a custom permission level group called custom contribute. The group permission seems to work fine and smoothly one day. The next day that it seems that users of the group can access the site but they cannot do anything else on the site without
receiving the tell us why you need access message.
The users in the group are accessing SharePoint from all over the world. Is there something that I can check within the settings to see why they have access one day and the next they don't? Or is SharePoint setup this way?
I have full control of the site and nothing changes from day to day. Any help or suggestions on this would be greatly appreciated.Hi kedge11,
Please check permissions for the users with this custom permission level from problematic SharePoint site, verify if they still have the expected custom contribute permissions.
Also test if this issue could be reproduced, if not, please re-create another same custom permissions for these users again.
If issue still persists, please check ULS log when this error occurs, it should provide some useful information for helping solve issue.
Thanks
Daniel Yang
TechNet Community Support -
Hi,
Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 R2 domain join displays error "Changing the Primary Domain DNS name of this computer to "" failed...."
DC:windows Server 2008 R2
Domain functional level:Windows Server 2003
When Winxp join domain, have no this error message.
I checked http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2018583?wa=wsignin1.0 does't work.
There have 3 suggestion in this article:
1.The "Disable NetBIOS over TCP/IP" checkbox has been disabled in the IPv4 properties of the computer being joined.
Doesnt's work.
2.Connectivity over UDP port 137 is blocked between client and the helper DC servicing the join operation in the target domain.
On my DC, I run netstat -an, reslut as below:
UDP 192.168.20.3:137 *:*
3.The TCP/IPv4 protocol has been disabled so that the client being joined or the DC in the destination domain targeted by the LDAP BIND is running TCP/IPv6 only.
We are not using IPV6.
This server recently updated from Windows Server 2003 to Windows Server 2008 R2. Before upgrade, when Win7 and Win2008 join this domain, also have the same error message.
Please help to check this issue.
Thank you very much.
BR
Guo YingHuiHi Guo Ying,
I have faced this critical error which makes over-writes the host names in the domain when you join.
For example: Already you had a host name called as PC.domain.com in the domain.com Domain.
When you try to add the another host name called as PC in the domain.com Domain, it doesn't give you the duplicate name error on the network it does over-write the existing host name called as PC.domain.com & it will add the new host name into the domain.
Host name which got over-written will get removed from the domain. I faced this issue in my project. My DPM host name got removed from the Domain & new host name got joined into the domain which halted my backups for one day.
Final Resolution is as follows:
You need to start the dns console on the DC & drop down the domain name.
Select the _msdcs when you click on _msdcs it will show the Name Server's list on the right hand side.
You need to add the Domain Naming Master under the _msdcs or add all the domain controllers which you had.
After you add the Name server's try joining the PC OR Laptop to the domain which is successfully joins it.
Regards
Anand S
Thanks & Regards Anand Sunka MCSA+CCNA+MCTS -
User analysis at Action level and Permission level
Hi Gurus,
I am totally confused by the way our CC is working while using it for User Analysis. I understand that during Risk Analysis for a user with Report Type "Action Level" will give the conflicts at the transaction level for the user and with Report Type "Permission Level" will give the conflicts at the Object level for the user. Also the permission level report includes the results of the action level report as well and hence Permission level report is more detailed & reliable.
But now when I run the analysis report for a particular user both at Action & Permission level...the user is not getting any conflicts at Action level but it is showing conflicts at the Permission level. For another user the vice versa is happening. Could anyone help me in understanding the above 2 scenarios?
Regards,
Lakshmi.Hi
A user to be need to have a action level conflict should have that transansaction code access only ie object s-tcode = xyz transaction code.
Similarly for a user to be reported in permission level conflict the user should have access to
S_tcode = xyz transaction code Plus all other authorisation objects...Or in other words if the user is missing any authorisation object it wont be reported there...
So just check what authorisation object level check is enabled for that transaction code in the rule architect tab.. Thereafter see whether user have access to all those authorisation object with the values specified...
Parveen -
User Analysis at Permission Level - Detail Report (RAR SP12)
Hello All,
I have having question regarding the User Level Analysis at Permission level report. Currently, we are on GRC Access control 5.3 SP12.
Per my understanding when you execute the User level analysis at Action level, you get SOD conflict reports based on T-code level and not on authorization / permission level. But, if you execute the user level analysis at permission level then SOD report is based on the authorization / permission object level.
But now, when I execute the user level analysis at PERMISSION LEVEL in the Informer tab, in the report I am only able to see "Transaction Code Check at Transaction Start" name in the Permission Object Column and "Transaction Code" name in the Field column.
Look forward to hear from you all.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
AngelicaHi Angelica,
This behaviour is ok for those risks in which you have not enabled any Object/Field value. It will pick S_TCODE Object and show you the risk.
This is useful because -
1. If you have risks defiend at Tcode level - you can still catch them while running risk analysis at permission level.
2. If you have Object Values defined in risk and you are running permission level analysis it will show risk only if Object Values meet. In that case permission level risk anlysis will not show risk if there is no actual risk.
3. Running risk analysis at Action level can show false positives when risk is defined ta Object level. So, it is always better to r
un alanysis at permission level, it will bring all actual risks skipping false positives.
4. You can run only one level risk analysis in CUP and ERM and permission level covers all risks.
If you have risk defined at Object Level and the role/user is not fulfilling all values, it should not show in permission level. In your case, if it is showing only "Transaction code check at start" and the risk is defined at Object Level, then sure it is a bug.
Regards,
Sabita -
Error "Multi-level error propagation carried out" when I run a report
Hi All,
When I run the report /SAPAPO/CDPS_REPT - Order and Resource Reporting with the below criteria I getting error "Multi-level error propagation carried out"
Planning Version - Simulation Version XXX
Evaluation Start - 05/03/2011
Evaluation End - 12/31/2013
Evaluation List - Extended Operation List
I do not get error when I run the report with selection as Active version 000 and Evaluation List as Order List, Operation List.
I have tried by ruuning Live cache consistancy check, but the issue is not fixed
Please help me to resolve this issue
Thanks & Regards,
RajkumarHi Jack,
Please do post the server log file here so that we can try and find a solution for the problem you are facing.
I had a problem a while ago with the app server too. While trying to run an application, after a few times, it would give me an error message saying the Application Server cannot be started. I rebooted my machine and thankfully it worked again. Just try this too and see if it works.
If it doesnt we can go through the server log and try to identify the cause of the problem.
Cheers :-) -
Permission denied error while CBS is building DCs
Hi,
from time to time we get an permission denied error when activating changes. The CBS server tries to check out files into the temporary build folders at the server and cannot do that for one file (see following error message).
As already said this happens only sometimes and only for single files.
Does anyone have the same experience and/or a suggestion how to solve this problem?
When deleting the folder and activating again the error has gone.
Build number assigned: 5843
Change request state from QUEUED to PROCESSING
ACTIVATION request in Build Space "CMS_EBYASZ_D" at Node ID: 9.611.151
[id: 2.568; parentID: 0; type: 4]
[options: NO OPTIONS]
REQUEST PROCESSING started at 2005-09-30 12:53:00.074 GMT
===== Pre-Processing =====
List of activities to be activated:
1 activity in compartment "eon.com_EON_EBY_ASZ_R_1"
Recherche Splitting Nachtrag 7 (30.09.05, 14:51)
[seq. no 23][created by H15430J at 2005-09-30 12:52:46.0][ID 4e1a116731af11daa5b00003ba1edce1]
Analyse activities... started at 2005-09-30 12:53:00.172 GMT
Synchronizing component "eon.com/eby/asz/recherch/util" from repository... finished at 2005-09-30 12:53:01.414 GMT and took 824 ms
Component "eon.com/eby/asz/recherch/util" is to be CHANGED by this activation.
1 component to be build in compartment "eon.com_EON_EBY_ASZ_R_1"
Analyse activities... finished at 2005-09-30 12:53:01.574 GMT and took 1 s 402 ms
Calculate all combinations of components and variants to be built...
"eon.com/eby/asz/recherch/util" variant "default"
Prepare build environment in the file system... started at 2005-09-30 12:53:02.173 GMT
Synchronize development configuration... finished at 2005-09-30 12:53:02.176 GMT and took 2 ms
Synchronize component definitions... finished at 2005-09-30 12:53:02.274 GMT and took 97 ms
Synchronize sources...
12:53:06.831 SYNC (FAILED: Failed to create/open file:
/usr/sap/D16/JC00/j2ee/cluster/server1/temp/CBS/39/.CACHE/228/DCs/eon.com/eby/asz/recherch/util/_comp/src/packages/de/isenergy/eby/zaehlerwesen/recherche/util/UtilComp.wdcontroller
(<b><u>Permission denied</u></b>)) UtilComp.wdcontroller (/usr/sap/D16/JC00/j2ee/cluster/server1/temp/CBS/39/.CACHE/228/DCs/eon.com/eby/asz/recherch/util/_comp/src/packages/de/isenergy/eby/zaehlerwesen/recherche/util/UtilComp.wdcontroller)
Prepare build environment in the file system... finished at 2005-09-30 12:53:08.555 GMT and took 6 s 382 ms
===== Pre-Processing ===== finished at 2005-09-30 12:53:08.560 GMT and took 8 s 411 ms
Change request state from PROCESSING to FAILED
ERROR! The following problem(s) occurred during request processing:
ERROR! The following error occurred during request processing:Failed to synchronize
/usr/sap/D16/JC00/j2ee/cluster/server1/temp/CBS/39/.CACHE/228/DCs/eon.com/eby/asz/recherch/util/_comp/src/packages
REQUEST PROCESSING finished at 2005-09-30 12:53:08.563 GMT and took 8 s 489 ms
Thanks for any hint
HelmutHi Sidharth,
good to hear that we are not the only company with this problem.
We also do have this problem since months, from SP9 to SP11.
First we thought that it would have been a CBS configuration or an OS problem but this cannot be the reason because as you already mentioned it works after serveral attempts. We also analysed the temporary CBS folders and noticed that only one file (the one that causes the error) does have other attributes than the others.
That sounds very strange and I hope that someone from SAP will read this task.
At the moment we are collecting all the problems and errors that appear with the JDI and the Netweaver Developeer Studio to present SAP this list in bulk. We cannot write an OSS note for every error we discover as suggested by SAP.
Stability mainly of the NWDS plugins is the biggest problem we have at the moment. Did you make the same experience?
Regards
Helmut -
Database-level error reported by JDBC driver
Hi everyone,
I get an error in my Sender JDBC adapter. I am executing a stored procedure every minute. In total I have 34 JDBC senders for every different database. The error is like below. The problem is in Alert Inbox I cant see the rest of the message. This error occures just once every hour (average). I dont know why and I dont know what the rest of the error is saying.
Any ideas how i can see the rest of the message? And where the error might be?
Note: In communication channel monitoring everything is green.
Database-level error reported by JDBC driver while executing statement 'EXEC [TBHi,
obviously there are concurring accesses to the table your stored procedure is accessing. This is nothing serious, because SAP XI will retry the execution of the stored procedure according to the settings of the communication channels (3times all 5 minutes is the default). Additionally you can set the repeats in case of SQL errors in the extended tab of the communication channel configuration.
Tuning the transaction isolation levels might help to avoid the error but can decrease the consistency of the data as well. Default isolation level is always the highest available in a database (in case of SQL Server it should be SERIALIZABLE), so locks might easily occur. I would suggest to have a look at other applications accessing the tables and determine their isolation level.
All in all, I guess there shouldn't be real problems, because of the repeated execution of you stored procedure, but it's worth to have a look at the isolation level.
Regards Sven
Maybe you are looking for
-
I bought the wrong book what can i do?
i bought the worn book what can i do?
-
Is it possible to call the contact number indicated in the cell?
Hello! Tell me please, I want to move a lot of contacts in the electronic form and organize a list of contacts in Numbers. Is it convenient to use it on the iphone? Is it possible to call the contact number indicated in the cell? That is an example:
-
I play scrabble with a friend on Lexulus, when she has made a play I get an e-mail on AOL with a link to Lexulus. That link takes me to the site and the game but the board doesn't show. On internet explorer it does.
-
Websphere 7.0.0.9 Oracle client 11.0.0.1
We have websphere 7.0.0.9 and the application works fine with Oracle client 11.0.0.1 But when we test the application with Oracle client 11.0.0.2, it's failing. Just I want to know whether websphere 7.0.0.9 is compatible with Oracle client 11.0.0.1 a
-
Gmail account keep asking for password
I have a few accounts on my email app. But The Gmail one keep asking me for password, I use 2 speet athentication and everytime use a new password but still does not solve the problem. I used to have this problem with yahoo before and also with and e