Inhouse as well as external opn

Hai,
Please help to map this scenaroi.
Client is tool manufacture in discrete environment, MTO Strategy (20)
They have 22 process (operations) to get FG
Operations (up to 20) will be process at either in-house or external , will be decide by at the time of production start.(after production order released)
They are asking WIP at each stage, scrap in each vendor, quality inspection, cost analysis for every external process. 
They are expecting minimum no of production orders do finish the GR.
Give me better solution.
Regards,
Dharma

Hi
create 1 FG part and 1 Raw material and 18 semi finished parts.
1st semifinised sya SF1 will have a BOM with compnent as Rawmtrl and a routing with single operation .
similarly SF2 will have A BOM with SF1 as component and a routing with single operation .
in the same fasion ou create till 20 th operation
for the 21st ans 22 operation
you have FG with component as SF20 and routing with 2 operations
for the parts SF1 to SF20 you have procurement type X and also maintain the Quota arrangement for in house production (use produtction version) and subcontracting.
Now you will have 21 production orders and 1 Purchase doc.
this will give you clear picture of WIP, Stock at different stage, scap at the vendor and costing at various stages precisely
only thing is you have to work little more for creation of master data
Hope this helps
BR
SK

Similar Messages

  • The auxillary jack on my Itouch does not allow sound to come through with headphones, though it works in a dock as well as external speakers.  How can I fix this?

    The auxillary jack on my Itouch does not allow sound to come through with headphones, though it works in a dock as well as external speakers.  How can I fix this?

    You can try the standard fixes of reset, restore from backup and restore to factory defaults to rule out a hsoftware proble.  Frequently it is to to a problem with the eadphone jack and the solution is to replace the jack.

  • Looking for a well-mannered external FW drive

    I've ordered Leopard and have decided to add a new external 500MB FW drive to take advantage Time Machine. Is there a reasonably quiet one that will play nicely with both Time Machine and my G4 Mini? Do I need to order a powered hub since I boot from a partition on my Maxtor or can I daisy-chain without getting an ugly performance hit?

    I tend to buy enclosures and bare drives but at work we are currently selling Western Digital My Book drives and Buffalo drives. I grabbed a 500GB My Drive for my wife and we've been happy with it. Whatever you drive, be sure to format it, nearly all external drives come formatted for Windows today.
    Generally, daisy chaining two to three drives is no problem, beyond that it is a crap shoot in my experience. That's when I look at a hub.

  • Best practices of having a different external/internal domain

    In the midst of migrating from a joint Windows/Mac server environment to a completely Apple one. Previously, DNS was hosted on the Windows machine using the companyname.local internal domain. When we set up the Apple server, our Apple contact created a new internal domain, called companyname.ltd. (Supposedly there was some conflict in having a 10.5 server be part of a .local domain - either way it was no worries either way.) Companyname.net is our website.
    The goal now is to have the Leopard server run everything - DNS, Kerio mailserver, website, the works. In setting up the DNS on the Mac server this go around, we were advised to just use companyname.net as the internal domain name instead of .ltd or .local or something like that. I happen to like having a separate local domain just for clarity's sake - users know if they are internal/external, but supposedly the Kerio setup would respond much better to just the one companyname.net.
    So after all that - what's the best practice of what I should do? Is it ok to have companyname.net be the local domain, even when companyname.net is also the address to our external website? Or should the local domain be something different from that public URL? Or does it really not matter one way or the other? I've been running companyname.net as the local domain for a week or so now with pretty much no issues, I'd just hate to hit a point where something breaks long term because of an initial setup mixup.
    Thanks in advance for any advice you all can offer!

    Part of this is personal preference, but there are some technical elements to it, too.
    You may find that your decision is swayed by the number of mobile users in your network. If your internal machines are all stationary then it doesn't matter if they're configured for companyname.local (or any other internal-only domain), but if you're a mobile user (e.g. on a laptop that you take to/from work/home/clients/starbucks, etc.) then you'll find it a huge PITA to have to reconfigure things like your mail client to get mail from mail.companyname.local when you're in the office but mail.companyname.net when you're outside.
    For this reason we opted to use the same domain name internally as well as externally. Everyone can set their mail client (and other apps) to use one hostname and DNS controls where they go - e.g. if they're in the office or on VPN, the office DNS server hands out the internal address of the mail server, but if they're remote they get the public address.
    For the most part, users don't know the difference - most of them wouldn't know how to tell anyway - and using one domain name puts the onus on the network administrator to make sure it's correct which IMHO certainly raises the chance of it working correctly when compared to hoping/expecting/praying that all company employees understand your network and know which server name to use when.
    Now one of the downsides of this is that you need to maintain two copies of your companyname.net domain zone data - one for the internal view and one for external (but that's not much more effort than maintaining companyname.net and companyname.local) and make sure you edit the right one.
    It also means you cannot use Apple's Server Admin to manage your DNS on a single machine - Server Admin only understands one view (either internal or external, but not both at the same time). If you have two DNS servers (one for public use and one for internal-only use) then that's not so much of an issue.
    Of course, you can always drive DNS manually by editing the zone files directly.

  • Cannot access shared external hard drive with other mac accounts

    I cannot access a shared external hard drive with other mac accounts (all accounts are on the same macbook Pro). The shared external drive is shared via time capsule and is connected (of course) in USB. I see well this external hard drive as a shared disk with my main account. Yes shared option has been activated with the Airport Utility .. but when I open other account these othe accounts can see the external drive but cannot access to its content that is flagged with a no way sign. Strangely enough when I close my main account and start opening a new session with one of the other account then fine I can access the external hard drive and its content .. BUT then it is from my main account than I cannot access its content the no way sign showing ..
    Looks like only one account at a time can access the content of this SHARED external hard drive .. any one as an idea on how to really make it a shared hard drive so that all accounts on the same mac can also access it ? I am at my wit ends on this case. THANKS ..

    Results of my enquiries at Apple Genius Bar .. the guys found the problem interesting. They've been unable to provide a fix neither to give any explanation as to the reason why. To be fair I was not much impressed by the technical level demonstrated ..
    In the mean time I have found that if account no.1 can see the shared external drive content and in such case account no.2 (same Mac computer) cannot see its content (only the external HD with a no way sign) this account no.2 can UNMOUNT (by ejecting) this external HD from account 1 and then remount it (just clicking on the TC shared part in a finder window) and .. see and access its content ; whilst account no.1 cannot see its content anylonger. Unless it unmounts the shared external HD and remount it .. then account no.2 can see its content anylonger. This can goes on an on.
    So eventually YES the TC can allow to share a USB external drive between several accounts and a same Mac .. BUT this require to unmount and remount EACH time the external drive is accessed from a "no.2 account". So OK to share files with seldom access but not practical in case of frequent access needed.
    I just I have now to figure how iTunes can automatically unmount and remount a shared external HD when it needs to access one of this shared HD content from on time account no.1 and then next time from account no.2. May be I am asking too much ..

  • If I replace my old iMac with a new one can I burn DVDs on an external drive using Mountain Lion or Toast?

    My 2006 iMac is getting a bit long in the tooth and I was thinking of replacing it with a new one. However, Mac have not included an optical drive and I back up my photographs on DVD as well as external hard drives. I also supply DVDs of my work to friends etc.
    Will I be able to burn to an external drive using Mountain Lion or other software such as Toast? Does the burn option still exist on the new machines?

    Hello,
    You shouldn't have any problem, if you do just try Burn...
    http://burn-osx.sourceforge.net/Pages/English/home.html

  • Consuming external web services in CAF

    Hi there,
    I am trying to set up a show case where a composite CAF app (exposed via WD or VC) uses SAP web services as well as external services. In this case, I chose to use the Fedex web services (http://fedex.com/developer).
    Everything works fine, I am able to import the webservice using the locally stored WSDL into my composite app, apply the mapping and implement the application service......build, deploy...all good.
    The problem occurs when trying to create the physical destination (under nwa/destination template management). NW expects a pointer/url to the wsdl or wsil file, but Fedex doesn't provide that via http. Putting the wsdl on a different web server doesn't help either as the SOAP call will be routed to the same host where the wsdl resides (in this case NOT the fedex system).
    Is there any way to circumvent the WSDL retrieval with external web services in Netweaver ? One alternative solution could be to use the Netweaver Service registry and publish the fedex wsdl to that, but I would like to avoid that as we haven't configured the SR at the moment.
    Thx, Nick

    Looks like I don't need it necessarily.
    There seems to be a bug in NW/CE 7.1. When defining a destination which points to a WSDL file which in turn points to a different server for SOAP messages (ServicePort), the endpoint URL is incorrectly defined.
    WSDL URL: http://www.server1.com/test.wsdl
    SOAP URL/Port: http://server2.com/webservices
    the server tries to dispatch the SOAP call to http://server1.com/webservices which can't be found.
    In CE 7.1.1. though, that bug is fixed, and everything works fine without the need to publish the remote service (wsdl) to the SR and to subsequently query it.
    Nick

  • EXTERNAL OPERATION in a production order with  different company code plant

    Hi,
    in my case i am having a production order with  4 operations.
      0010 milling
      0020 winding
      0030 cutting
      0040 milling
    among this opearion 0030 i want to do it in a plant which is assigned to different company code than mine.
    in this case whether i should proceed with PP01 Control key  with opearion plant as that plant which is lieing in diffent company code or
    i should specify  PP02 control key saying that plant as an external vendor for me and do PR  and PO for that service .
    which should i follow for my case and how cost gets updated .

    Hi,
          For different company code, u have to specify PP02 in the routing for external vendor. In PP02 control key indicator must be set in external opn.
    Before that create purchase info record.
    Enter subcontract info record in routing.
    after running MRP , convert the PR to PO.
    Send the material by MB1B by 541 mvt
    Receive the material by MIGO  by 101 mvt.
    Regards,
    Raja sd

  • External USB Hard Drive Can't Be Safely Removed After Boot Camp 3.1 Install

    I just wanted to report that I've done multiple installs of Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit on my MacBook 4,1 and although I've had no problem using the cmd workaround ( http://www.zath.co.uk/how-to-install-windows-7-on-apple-mac-boot-camp/ ) to install the 64-bit Boot Camp drivers that come with the Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard retail DVD, I have found that by installing the Boot Camp 3.1 drivers on the same system, under no circumstance can I click the the "Safely Remove Hardware" icon in the system tray and not receive a message saying that ... "The device 'Generic Volume' cannot be safely ejected..." and that some program or service must be using it. However, a restart doesn't solve the problem any more than logging out does.
    I read somewhere that part of the fix that Boot Camp 3.1 was intended to provide was to allow safe ejecting of the Macintosh HFS+ partition. Well, my external hard drive has three partitions: one NTFS, another NTFS, and a third HFS+ for Time Machine backups. I suspect, since I haven't seen anyone else reporting this issue, that it may simply be that the Boot Camp 3.1 drivers don't take into account the possibility of an HFS+ partition on external USB devices. Anyway, a System Restore to before Boot Camp 3.1 drivers were installed completely remedies the issue.
    At this point, I'm not having any trackpad issues or anything else of note with respect to the original Boot Camp 3.0 drivers that came with the Snow Leopard retail disc, so I'm fine keeping those drivers installed and allowing Windows Update to update the Intel and Marvell drivers as it recommends. I just find it slightly amusing that the Boot Camp 3.0 drivers, which supposedly did not support Windows 7 (let alone the 64-bit version) work better than the 3.1 drivers which do supposedly support Windows 7. And the funny thing (or is it?) is that you have to install the original Boot Camp drivers with the cmd workaround before you're even able to update to the Boot Camp 3.1 drivers. Hilarious stuff there.
    Proprietary gamesmanship is a big reason some of us prefer the Linux "share the ownership +for free+" model of computing. Just saying...
    Anyone have any proper solutions (as in, other than "don't install the updates then!")?
    bkadoctaj

    I have a pair of external usb drives, one formatted for NTFS and the other for HFS+ connected through an external 7 port hub. I am running Windows 7 (64 bit) with bootcamp 3.1 on a late 2009 Mac BookPro. I share the same "safely remove hardware" issues you described. I always assumed it was because my external drives were connected through my external USB hub because of a similar issue I had running Vista (64 bit), but now I can confirm directly connecting the external USB HFS+ drive also yields the same "safely remove hardware" problem. Unfortunately for me, if I regress to the Bootcamp 3.0 drivers, my audio drivers, at times, fails to load. I would need to regress to Windows Vista (64 bit), the last environment where my iSight camera, internal speakers and all other hardware performed correctly. I would gladly, at this point, live with the "safely remove hardware" issue in exchange for a working iSight camera, the one and only hardware device lost to me in the move to Windows 7.

  • How do i partition external hard drive using mac

    how do i partition my external hard drive on mac? can i use it as time machine disk as well as external drive?

    You can use an external disk for store files and for Time Machine, but you have to create a second volume.
    To create volumes on the external disk, use Disk Utility. See > http://pondini.org/OSX/DU3.html I recommend you to put as much space as you can for the Time Machine volume, because backups consume a lot and Time Machine starts deleting backups when the external disk is full

  • Errors on external USB drive

    I'm trying to track down the cause of failed backups to a brand-new 300Gb Seagate drive in a external USB <-> SATA enclosure.
    I observe these errors in Retrospects verification phase.
    These errors could
    - be 10.4.6 not playing well with external USB drives - that the new drive is essentially DOA
    - that the enclosure is a dud.
    - reflect an inability on Retrospect's part (e.g. unable to work properly with USB drives on 10.4.6)
    I've asked on the EMC Retrospect forum for their take on this, buts that's a very slow forum...
    Any pointers are welcome. I strongly prefer not to have to buy commercial solutions; after all, the "fix" may be to ask the supplier to take his drive back and refund me and I wouldn't want to spend if that's the case. Command-line solutions are fine.
    The data can be correctly backed up to another external drive (via Firewire) so its not the source data. Its not the specific USB port: tried other ports, etc. At one point there were some errors reported by Disk Utility, but I've repaired these and it now claims all is well.
    Dual G5/2Ghz/4GB RAM   Mac OS X (10.4.6)   ExternalUSB enclosure; 300Gb Seagate SATA drive

    I see my question is so popular, I'm left composing a soliloquy... :-/
    Anyway, an upgrade to OS X 10.4.7 (from 10.4.6) seems to have put this right, after a lot of different testing exercises and reading. At least for the first time in many attempts I've been able to run a sizeable backup using Retrospect without the verification pass yielding hundreds of errors.
    It would seem, at least for Retropsect users, that OS X 10.4.6 needs to be avoided if you intend backing up to an external USB drive--?
    Dual G5/2.0Ghz/4GB RAM    

  • Advice - External HD for use with Time Machine?

    Hi,
    Just wanted to know what's best for me to buy. Looking into what's available has only made me more confused...
    I want a HD that:
    - Works well with Time Machine and my Macbook
    - Will copy everything from my computer rather than drag-and-drop or manual file choice (although that's more the program I use than the HD itself, right; Time Machine does that as far as I know?)
    - Enough space for all of my video files from my video camera (there's quite a lot of them)
    I want to start deleting some video files from my computer and my video camera but I don't want to lose them, so that's the major use really. As long as they'll all fit and if I want one back on my computer again it'll be easy enough to find it and put it back on...
    Any ideas? Keep in mind that I live in Perth, Western Australia...
    (And I apologise for the ignorance/lack of proper techy terms!)

    Hi Eleanor,
    I'm from Sydney so it's great to see another Aussie on here! Welcome to the forum.
    Just a couple of points that I would keep in mind in addition to the correct advice already given:
    Apple recommends having a dedicated drive for Time Machine, so ideally you wouldn't use it for anything else. Also, as a guideline, they recommend having a Time Machine drive at least twice as large as the primary drive in your computer so that enough space is always available. The more space, the further back your backups will go before needing to be written over.
    You can put other stuff on the drive but ideally it's better (if your budget allows) to get a second external drive for video camera files and the like. Those video files also grow pretty big as you've probably noticed, so they will need room to move as well. External drives are cheaper than ever, so two drives is the best bet.
    One final recommendation/option is to go for a Time Capsule as your Time Machine drive. The benefit here is that it works wirelessly so you won't have to plug it into your USB/firewire port at all. It just backs up without any action from you whatsoever, which is what makes it ideal. If you don't yet have a WiFi network, here's your chance to dive in. If you do, it's a natural fit for your network.
    So my ultimate recommendation is: 1) Time Capsule 2) USB/firewire drive.
    I hope that helps!
    Message was edited by: Michael271

  • IMac Media Server, or External Hard Drive Connected to Airport Extreme?

    I would like to create a central repository for all of my movies/music which I would like to stream to an apple tv. For now, it is all iTunes compatible stuff. At the same time, i want to be able to access those media files from my iPad, iPhone, and other Mac machines throughout my house.
    I currently have an iMac that is not often used. I had an idea to use it as a media server through which I could stream all of my media to the apple tv. The plan would be to buy a 3 or 4 TB hard drive, and connect the hard drive directly to the iMac (ideally via firewire), and then upload all of my movies/music to the hard drive, while keeping the libraries intact on the iMac. In addition, I would like to keep the library on my MBP, but direct the hard drive to utilize the media files on that same hard drive (so, essentially, using one set of media files, in two iTunes libraries). This way (I'm thinking), I should be able to stream my media from either library on my Apple TV (but in reality, the media is all on the one hard drive) and to my iDevices in my home.
    The other option I have come up with is to connect a hard drive on the network, directly to the airport extreme (probably via USB, unless someone knows of a GE drive that is not a pre-formatted NAS server). Then I would hope to link the media libraries on both computers through to the media files stored on the hard drive.
    So the questions I have are:
    Which is the better set up for home streaming? Will one be faster than the other?
    Is there a better way of doing this?
    If I downloaded the Plex Media server to the iMac in the first option, would I be able to access all of the media on my Smart TV w/o the Apple TV?
    Thanks in advance for your input.

    Which is the better set up for home streaming? Will one be faster than the other?
    Both will be about the same.  The issue I would be sure to look at is how well the external hard drive's wake from sleep mode works.  It is annoying if the drive sometimes goes to sleep and will not wake up without you waking over to the computer.
    The direct connect via firewire is a slightly faster more reliable option, but not really something you will notice given the ATV would only need a fraction of the bandwith either have.
    The more important thing for performace woudl be to use eithernet instead of WiFi.  You will make your life a lot easer if you do not try to do streaming HD video over WiFi.
    If I downloaded the Plex Media server to the iMac in the first option, would I be able to access all of the media on my Smart TV w/o the Apple TV?
    No.  ATV can only see content that is in your local iTunes setup or in iCloud.  So in of these setups you will need the content on these drives to be added to iTunes.

  • Loss on scrap sales to be reflected externally

    Hi ,
    The following things reflect while dealing with scrap sales loss..
    When the assets which are declared as scrap are retired/ deleted from Asset Inventory list from Asset module, using T-Code ABAVN the system automatically create/post a document containing the following journal entry.
    Accumulated Depreciation A/C Dr
    Loss due to Scrap sale A/C Dr
    To APC Account Cr
    There is no scope to Post the value to the GL A/C u2018Loss due to scrap sale A/cu2019 externally. Therefore the amount received as advance against the scrap sale could not be adjusted against the GL u2018Loss due to scrap sale accountu2019. As the scrape sale in MM Module is not mapped in SAP system, the invoice so needed for adjustment of such receipt is to be done externally vide JV entry in FI-AM.  We need the system to accept entries into the GL A/C u2018Loss Due to scrap saleu2019 both internally as well as externally, so that the amount, received against scrap sale can be adjusted against proper head of accounts
    Regards
    Arvind

    Thanks Srini,
    I have proposed the soln to the client. We need to just assign the corresponding the G/L accnt with the downpaymenty clearing accnt in the acquistion account assignment in AO90.
    Could you plzz elaborate on it...
    Regards
    Arvind

  • Internal and External Portals be hosted & Configured on Same Portal server?

    Hi Experts,
    Is it possible to host and configure the Internal portal and External Portal on the same portal server?
    If yes, kindly provide the inputs.
    We have a scenario wherein we have to use the same portal server for both kinds of users (Internal as well as External).
    We want to provide separate URLs for both the portals and the datasource for the users management would be different for both the scenarios.
    The user managemnet in case of Internal Portal has to be authenticated to an AD server whereas in case of External Portal the user management would be taken care by UME.
    Please suggest and share some docs if possible.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Anurag

    Hi,
    Can we customise the Portal logon page for both the portals differently?
    I've already customised the portal logon page by modifying the UME properties in the Config Tool but that was done keeping in mind the External Portal users. Now, we want to customise the page for Intranet users but with different options at the logon page.
    How can we achieve this functionality as any property that we modify in either VA or Config Tool will affect both types of portal pages.
    For an eg. we have a Self Registration link for the external users which we do not want for the Intranet users. How is this possible?
    If we design a webdynpro java application for the logon page and for authentication purpose, can we call a home page iview on successful authentication?
    And with this customised webdynpro java application, can we connect to the AD server for the user authentication?
    Best Regards,
    Anurag

Maybe you are looking for