Initial view controller changes automatically

Hi ,
I have localized my app to two languages (English & German) . I set view controller 'A' as initial view controller, So it should start from screen 'A'. Every thing works fine with English version. But when I change language to German my app doesnt start at screen A , it starts instead with screen 'X' which was my initial view controller before Localizing the app.
Could you please tell what mistake I am doing ?
Best Regards
Venu Gandhe

Sorry understood the problem..there are two storyboards (one for German one for English)..:)

Similar Messages

Reading Panes views on Shared Mailbox changes automatically issue

Can someone please advise if this is a known bug or if it's just because it is the way the software is configured?
Our email account are hosted by Microsoft on Office365.
Email accounts are added as an account on Outlook2010.
When accessing shared mailboxes, the reading pane view settings changes automatically from time to time from "Date to Category".
I noticed that others have raised a query on this previously but never got a properly answer.
NOTE: PLEASE DO NOT SUGGEST TURNING OFF READING PANE AS THAT IS A STUPID IDEA FOR THOSE WHO SUGGESTS IT. We all know you can turn it off as an option but if people wants to use it, you don't just tell them not to use it as a workaround.
You wouldn't tell someone to go catch a bus if their car is broken temporary. You fix the car so that you can use it later.
Thank you.

Hi,
According to my konwledge and research, this issue is relate to Outlook Client.
I suggest you contact Outlook Support Team so that your can get more professional suggestions. For your convenience:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=outlook&filter=alltypes&sort=lastpostdesc
Thanks

I have a swipe gesture that swipes a UIView onto the main View Controller. Is there a way to change the speed that the UIView swipes on?

I dont need the image to swipe to follow the speed of the gesture, I just want the swipe to be slower as at the moment it comes on so fast it almost pops on.
Thanks!

Thank you very much for your speedy answer.
I was hoping to get the effect of a push segue from the initial View Controller screen to a UIView on that same view controller. I seem to be able to add this option into my Swipe Gesture connections, (storyboard shows the segue arrow exiting the View controller and then pointing back into the same View Controller) This would be ideal, but I cant work out if its possible to link this segue to the new UIView I want. At the moment it just feeds back to the initial View Controller screen! Argggh!!!

Changing View controller in CRM_IC Application

Hi all,
I am new to IC Webclient. I have copied a standard view and made some changes. Now my requirement is I want to replace the existing view (of CRM_IC Application) into my View (Custom BSP view).
Can any one let me know where I can change the view controller?
I also set my view in IC Webclient runtime framework Profile and mentioned my view controller in controller substitution. Profile is maintained correctly in Organization structure.
Thanks in Advance

Hi Bruno,
Thanks for ur reply I Have Did the same but I can't able to See the Changes.
I have copied CRM_IC/BuPaSearchB2B to ZXXX/BuPaSearchB2B. Modified the View ZXXX/BuPaSearchB2B.
Then in CRMC_IC_RTFRAMEWORK I have mentioned this view in Controller Substitutes.
But still I am Unable to see the changes when I run CRM_IC.Can you let me know what could be the problem.
Thanks in Advance

Acrobat 7 Pro, Script to Automate "Initial View" Settings

Can you create an Applescript that let's you batch define Acrobat's 'Initial View' settings under the Document Properties of an existing PDF?
I am not familiar with scripting language and enable the UI feature of Script Editor, but it didn't seem to record my actions. Photoshop's Actions don't allow me to define these specific settings.
Dual 1.8 G5 Mac OS X (10.4.7)

Thanks, Bernd. I forgot to mention in the original post that the "Restore last view settings when reopening documents" option IS disabled (unchecked), both in Acrobat and Reader. The behavior described occurs with this option disabled.

PDF through VBA: How to set Initial View?

- Adobe Acrobat 6.0 (sorry we're a bit out of date)
- MS Office 2003
- MS Windows XP Professional SP2
I am trying to automate the creation of PDFs from MS Word. I have succeeded. My VBA code works fine (have pasted it below). I can create a PDF, and give it a title and author.
The problem I am having is with the Initial View settings, i.e. how the document opens. I want to hardcode:
1. Show to "Page Only"
2. Page Layout to "Continuous"
3. Magnification to "Fit Width"
The first I have done, using AcroExch.PDDoc's SetPageMode() function (although it seems to default to that even without doing this). I cannot, for the life of me, find any reference to the second and third, though. This must be doable, right? Be kind of weird not to have access to this in the API.
Hours of Googling has thrown up three ideas I've discarded.
1. AcroExch.App's SetPreference() function. This would presumably change preferences on the machine making the PDF, not reading it. I don't want to fiddle with other people's preferences anyway.
2. AcroExch.AVPageView's ZoomTo() function. Ditto. I am not creating an app to view PDFs, just trying to configure the default for opening one I've created.
3. An "undocumented" SetOpenInfo() in AcroExch.PDDoc. This looked the most promising for Magnification, but nobody seems to be able to get it to work, and it does nothing for me either. Someone somewhere even suggested it had been deprecated in later versions of Acrobat.
So... what do I do?
Thanks in advance for any pointers.
jON
===============================================
Sub MakePDF(strFilename As String, strTitle As String, strAuthor As String)
Dim pdfD As PdfDistiller
Dim strPDFName As String
Dim strPSName As String
strPSName = strFilename & ".ps"
strPDFName = strFilename & ".pdf"
'... make PS
Application.ActivePrinter = myPDFPrinter
Application.PrintOut Filename:="", _
Range:=wdPrintAllDocument, _
Item:=wdPrintDocumentContent, _
Copies:=1, _
Pages:="", _
PageType:=wdPrintAllPages, _
ManualDuplexPrint:=False, _
Collate:=True, _
Background:=False, _
PrintToFile:=True, _
PrintZoomColumn:=0, _
PrintZoomRow:=0, _
PrintZoomPaperWidth:=0, _
PrintZoomPaperHeight:=0, _
OutputFileName:=strPSName, _
Append:=False
'... make PDF
Set pdfD = New PdfDistiller
pdfD.FileToPDF strPSName, strPDFName, ""
'... tag PDF
Set qq = CreateObject("AcroExch.PDDoc")
b = qq.Open(strPDFName)
b = qq.SetInfo("Title", strProperties_Title)
b = qq.SetInfo("Author", strProperties_Author)
b = qq.SetPageMode(1) '... 1 = PDUseNone
b = qq.Save(33, strPDFName) '... 33 = PDSaveFull (1) OR PDSaveCollectGarbage (32)
b = qq.Close
End Sub

I have the same problem. I need to change Initial View Settings configuring the following settings
2. Page Layout to "Single Page"
3. Magnification to "Fit Width"
My software configuration is as follows:
- Adobe Acrobat 7.9
- Microsoft Windows XP SP2
- Visual Basic 6
Has anyone worked with this attributes of Acrobat?

Initial View set with epilogue.ps when exporting pdf from Indesign

Hi all. After years of Quarking, Freehanding, Pagemakering and my favourite, Indesigning, i finally got down to investigating a one step solution to setting the initial view in pdfs.
When distributing pdf 'layouts' and 'proofs' to clients i always set the pdf's initial view to fit page before emailing. It is simply the pro thing to do, and allows for a client to view the 'big picture' without having to first see a close-up of the top of a layout or design.
In the same breath i would set a business card layout to open at 125% or 150% so they get a feel for the actual size of finished product.
Well all these years of pdf proofing i have been hitting the old ⌘-D in Acrobat and manually setting initial view to fit page. Then ⌘-S and "bobs your uncle".
Ready to email.
Huge deadlines aside, this morning i woke up early, and decided to have a good look online as to what one can do to automate this small, but oh so repetitive task. Well reading about the prologue.ps and epilogue.ps, got me really excited, especially when i implemented a little postscript tweak to the epilogue.ps, and distiller saw it through beautifully.
Alas my elation was short lived as it seems Indesign uses it's own 'distiller' so to speak and does not see the epilogue.ps.
And i am definitely not going to start printing ps files to a 'watched folder'. I spent years distilling manually, and since Indesign and it's superb built in pdf-ing, i have never looked back.
So looks like we are all gonna have to continue ⌘-D ing, till adobe picks this up and changes the build to accomodate.
Just wanted to put this out there, and see perhaps if anybody has another take on this one. Am i missing something. If i am please let us all know.
Many thanks,
Rupert Pluck

If you upgrade to InDesign CS5, there are two ways to export a PDF file: (1) For Print. This this does not include the option to set Initial View (2) For Interactive. For Interactive PDF's you can set the Initial View in InDesign.

Controlling the page view between initial view, bookmarks and links

I have a 300 page InDesign document with links, buttons and bookmarks. The client wants it to open at an initial view of 50%. All of the other navigation is set to Inherent Zoom. This works well except the bookmarks which automatically switch to fit in window. (The bookmarks were made in InDesign). This happen whether they are used from the nav buttons (set as anchors) or using the side panel bookmarks for navigation.
If I go back and try to reset the view in bookmark properties in Acrobat it seems to add the 2 magnifications together.
Is there a way to set the bookmark to be at 50%? I tried going back to InDesign to set the bookmark when the magnification is at at certain % but that didn't seem to work either.
thanks!

Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode|Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions (Firefox/Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Extensions) or if hardware acceleration is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox/Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Appearance).
*Do NOT click the Reset button on the Safe Mode start window or otherwise make changes.
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Safe+Mode
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes
I assume that you were referring to setting browser.tabs.onTop pref to false on the about:config page.
Current Firefox versions only show the "Tabs on Top" menu entry in the "View > Toolbars" and "Firefox > Options" menu and in toolbar context menus if the tabs aren't in the default position on top.

In Sales doc.,Shiping Point need to change automatically by changing itemca

Hi,
I need a quick help from you all...
In a sales order,For a specific line item...while changing the Item category the respecitive shiping point has to change automatically.
Could you please suggest any approach of solving through standard....
In rare case,If we cannot able to do it standards (config) May I know the approch thorugh ABAP programme.
Thnaks & Regards,
Pugal

Hi there,
By standard SAp this is not possible coz Shipping point ddetermination is Shipping conditions /Loading grp / Plant.
When you change the item catg, none of the above parameters change. So shipping point willnot change.
But from customizing point of view, you can define a enw Z table, maintain the fields like item catg, shipping point etc.
In the table yu can enter the item catg - shipping point combination. In the prog MV45AFZZ, you can write a ABAP code sothat when the user changes the item catg in VA02, system should call the Z table & change the shipping point accordingly.
Pls note that this will only change the shipping point when the item catg is changed. Shiiping point that is proposed during sales order initial entry will always be standard determination.
If you also by-pass standard shipping point determination, then you need to write the ABAP code in MV45AFZZ to always refer the shipping point from Z table whatever may be the item catg.
But why do you want to relate all standard parameters with item catg?
Regards,
Sivanand

Real Model View Controller with JTextField

Hi!
I am new to Java (so please bear with me). I am building a swing application. I already have added a JTable with a corresponding table model that extends AbstractTableModel. Rather than store the data in the table model, I have modified setValueAt and getValueAt to write and read cell data to another location. So far, everything is fine. When doing setValueAt, I have a fireTableCellUpdated statement that I use to update the edited cell. So far, things are all still fine.
I would like to do the same thing with a JTextField. I found an example in Core Java Volume 1 for create a class that extends PlainDocument. It uses insertString to update the document in a way that ensures that only numbers are entered. I implemented this. Everything is still fine. I changed insertString to update my remote repository (a field in another class). Everything is still fine. Next, I tried to change (override) both getText methods to read from the repository. This works, but is not reflected on the screen.
I realize that I need the equivalent of a fireTableCellUpdated statement for the class that extends PlainDocument, but do not know how to do this.
I have looked a lot over the internet for the model view controller implementation. I know that it can be done using event and event listeners, but this seems to defeat the purpose of the model view controller - it seems like you ought to be able to directly modify the model object to access external data.
My code is below.
Thanks/Phil Troy
* PlainDocument class to make it possible to:
* - Make sure input in unsigned integer
* - Automatically save data to appropriate locate
* This will hopefully eventually work by overriding the insertString and getText methods
* and creating methods that can be overridden to get and save the numerical value
class UnsignedIntegerDocument extends PlainDocument
     TutorSchedulerPlusSettings settings;
     JTextField textField;
     public UnsignedIntegerDocument(TutorSchedulerPlusSettings settings)
     {     super();
          this.settings = settings;
     public void setTextField(JTextField textField)
     {     this.textField = textField;
     // Overridden method
     public void insertString(int offs, String str, AttributeSet a) throws BadLocationException
     {     if (str == null) return;
          String oldString = getText(0, getLength());
          String newString = oldString.substring(0, offs) + str +oldString.substring(offs);
          try
          {     setValue(Integer.parseInt(newString));
               super.insertString(offs, str, a);
               fireInsertUpdate(new DefaultDocumentEvent(offs, 10, DocumentEvent.EventType.INSERT));
          catch(NumberFormatException e)
     public String getText()
     {     return String.valueOf(getValue());
     public String getText(int offset, int length) throws BadLocationException
     {     String s = String.valueOf(getValue());
          if (length > 0)
               s = s.substring(offset, length);
          return s;
     public void getText(int offset, int length, Segment txt) throws BadLocationException
     {     //super.getText(offset, length, txt);
          char[] c = new char[10];
          String s = String.valueOf(getValue());
          s.getChars(offset, length, c, 0);
          txt = new Segment(c, 0, length);
     public String getValue()
     {     int i = settings.maxStudents;
          String s = String.valueOf(i);
          return s;
     void setValue(int i)
     {     settings.maxStudents = i;
}

Hi!
Thanks for your response. Unfortunately, based on your response, I guess that I must not have clearly communicated what I am trying to do.
I am using both JTables and JTextFields, and would like to use them both in the same way.
When using JTable, I extend an AbstractTableModel so that it refers to another data source (in a separate class), rather than one inside of the AbstractTableModel. Thus the getValueAt method, getColumnCount method, setValueAt method, . .. all call methods in another class. The details of that other class are irrelevant, but they could be accessing data from a database (via JDBC) or from other machines via some other communication mechanism.
I would like to do exactly the same thing with a JTextField. I wish for the data to come from a class other than an object of type PlainDocument, or of any class that implements the Document interface. Instead, I would like to use a class that implements the Document interface to call my external class using methods similar to those found in AbstractTableModel.
You may ask why I would like to to this. I have specific reasons here, but more generally this would be helpful when saving or retrieving parameters set and displayed in a JTextField to a database, or when sharing JTextField to multiple users located on different machines.
As to whether this is real MVC or not, I think it is but it really doesn't matter.
I know that I can accomplish what I want for the JTextField using listeners. However, I would like my code for the JTables to be similarly structured to that of the JTextField.
Thanks/Phil Troy

WD -SALV- setting initial view

Hi everyone,
I saw some forums in SDN about setting the initial View in a SALV.
Someone suggested to use R_COMPONENT of type IF_SALV_WD_COMP_TABLE_PERS in order to call the method SET_STANDARD_VIEW.
But noone was able to indicate how r_component could be properly referenced. (Such Forums are anyhow marked as closed but unanswered).
I would be very pleased to know if someone managed to do it, and how.
Thank you so much.
Best Regards,
Christian

Hi,
Please refer to this code and make changes accordingly as per the conditions -
METHOD wddoinit.
DATA:
    lo_nd_mara                 TYPE REF TO if_wd_context_node,
    lt_mara                    TYPE        wd_this->elements_mara,
    lo_cmp_usage               TYPE REF TO if_wd_component_usage,
    lo_interfacecontroller     TYPE REF TO iwci_salv_wd_table ,
    lo_api_interfacecontroller TYPE REF TO if_wd_controller,
    lo_pers                    TYPE REF TO if_wd_personalization,
    lv_value                   TYPE REF TO cl_salv_wd_config_table,
    lt_var                     TYPE        wdr_pers_variants,
    wa_var                     TYPE        wdr_pers_variant,
    ls_config_key              TYPE        wdy_config_key.
* navigate from <CONTEXT> to <MARA> via lead selection
lo_nd_mara = wd_context->get_child_node( name = wd_this->wdctx_mara ).
* Get material master data
SELECT * FROM mara INTO TABLE lt_mara UP TO 10 ROWS.
* @TODO handle non existant child
IF lo_nd_mara IS NOT INITIAL.
    lo_nd_mara->bind_table( new_items = lt_mara set_initial_elements = abap_false ).
ENDIF.
* Instantiate ALV
lo_cmp_usage =   wd_this->wd_cpuse_alv_materials( ).
IF lo_cmp_usage->has_active_component( ) IS INITIAL.
    lo_cmp_usage->create_component( ).
ENDIF.
* Get the interface controller of the component usage
lo_interfacecontroller =   wd_this->wd_cpifc_alv_materials( ).
* Get the model object of ALV
IF lo_interfacecontroller IS NOT INITIAL.
    lv_value = lo_interfacecontroller->get_model(
* Get the API reference
    lo_api_interfacecontroller = lo_interfacecontroller->wd_get_api( ).
ENDIF.
* Get personalization obect
IF lo_api_interfacecontroller IS NOT INITIAL.
    CALL METHOD lo_api_interfacecontroller->get_personalization_manager
      RECEIVING
        pers_manager = lo_pers.
ENDIF.
* Get variants
IF lo_pers IS NOT INITIAL.
    CALL METHOD lo_pers->get_variants
      RECEIVING
        variants = lt_var.
ENDIF.
* Set the default variant
* Required variant is read
* READ statement can be modified as per the requirement.
* As this application holds only one user variant, first record is read.
##read the respective records based on your condition
IF lt_var IS NOT INITIAL.
    READ TABLE lt_var INTO wa_var INDEX 1.
    IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
      ls_config_key-config_id    = wa_var-config_id .
      ls_config_key-config_type = wa_var-config_type.
      ls_config_key-config_var   = wa_var-config_var.
    ENDIF.
    TRY.
        CALL METHOD lo_pers->set_default_variant
          EXPORTING
            config_key = ls_config_key
            set        = abap_true.
      CATCH cx_wd_personalization .
    ENDTRY.
* Get the variant information based on variant id
* Load the variant/ Set the default variant
    CALL METHOD lo_pers->load_config_by_key
      EXPORTING
        config_key            = ls_config_key
        fetch_default_variant = abap_true.
ENDIF.
ENDMETHOD.
Regards,
Lekha.

Question about view/controller/nib class design

Assume you need to make an application with, let's say, 15 different views in total. There are two extreme design choices you can use to implement the app:
1) Every single view has its own view controller and a nib file. Thus you end up with 15 controller classes and 15 nib files (and possibly a bunch of view classes if any of your views needs to be somehow specialized).
2) You have only one controller which manages all the views, and one nib file from which they are loaded.
AFAIK Apple and many books recommend going purely with option #1. However, going with this often results in needless complexity, large amounts of classes (and nib files) to be managed and complicated class dependencies, especially if some of the views (and thus their controllers) interact with each other or share something (something which would be greatly simplified if all these related views were handled by one single controller class).
Option #2 also usually ends up being very complex. The major problem is that the single controller will often end up being enormous, handling tons of different (and usually unrelated) things (which is just outright bad design). This is seldom a good design, unless your application consists of only a few views which are closely related to each other (and thus it makes sense for one single controller class to handle them).
(Option #2 also breaks the strictest interpretation of the MVC pattern, but that's not really something I'm concerned about. I'm concerned about simple design, not about following a programming pattern to the letter.)
A design somewhere in between the two extremes often seems to be the best approach. However, since I don't have decades of Cocoa programming experience, I would like to hear some opinions about this subject matter from people with more experience on that subject. (I do have object-oriented programming experience, but I have only relatively recently started programming for the iPhone and thus Cocoa and its design patterns are relatively new to me, so I'm still learning.)

Somehow I get the feeling that my question was slightly misunderstood.
I was not asking "which one of these two designs do you think is better, option #1 or option #2?" I already said in my original post that option #2 is bad design (unless your application consists of just one or two views). That's not the issue.
The issue is that from my own experience trying to adhere very strictly to the "every single view must have its own view controller and nib file" often results in needless complexity. Of course this is not always the case, but sometimes you end up having controller classes which perform very similar, if not even the exact same actions, resulting in code repetition. (An OO'ish solution to this problem would be to have a common base class for these view controllers where the common functionality has been grouped, but this often just adds to the overall complexity of the class hierarchy rather than alleviating it.)
As an example, let's assume that you have a set of help screens (for example one help screen for each major feature of the app) and a view where you can select which help view to show. Every one of these views has, for example, a button to immediately exit the help system. If you had one single controller class managing these views, this becomes simpler: The controller can switch between any of the views and the buttons of each view (most of them doing the same things) can call back actions on this controller (eg. to return to the help selection or to exit the help screen completely). These help screens don't necessarily have any functionality of their own, so it's questionable what do they would need view controllers of their own. These view controllers would basically be empty because there's nothing special for them to do.
View controllers might make it easy to use the navigation controller class, but the navigation controller is suitable mainly for utility apps but often not for things like games. (And if you need animated transitions between views, that can be implemented using the UIView animation features.)
I also have hard time seeing the advantages of adhering strictly to the MVC pattern. The MVC pattern is useful in things like web servers, where MVC adds flexibility. The controller acts as a mediator between the database and the user interface, and it does so in such an abstract way that either one can be easily changed (eg. the "view", which normally outputs HTML, could be easily changed to a different "view" which outputs a PDF or even plain text, all this without having to touch the controller or the model at all). However, I'm not seeing the advantages of the MVC pattern in an iPhone app. It provides a type of class design, but why is it better than some other class design? It's not like the input and output formats of the app need to be changed on the fly (which is one advantage of a well-designed program using the MVC pattern).

How to go from a View Controller to a View Controller

Hey everyone, I have asked this question over on Stack Overflow, and really had no luck with it.
     I am wondering how to go from one (1) View Controller that has buttons and another View Controller that has a UIWebViewer in? I know how to do the simple part to get the two to link up. But, the buttons are going to have different URL's hooked up to them, and I want to be able to reuse the Web Viewer. I am using the Swift Programming language to be able to do this.
below is my current code that is has my buttons sitting on top of my web viewer,
import UIKit
import WebKit
class ViewController: UIViewController {
    @IBOutlet var wbView: UIWebView!
    var strUrl = ""
        @IBAction func buttonAction(sender: UIButton) {
            switch (sender.tag){
            case 1:
                strUrl = "https://www.google.co.in/"
            case 2:
                strUrl = "https://in.yahoo.com/"
            case 3:
                strUrl = "https://www.facebook.com/"
            case 4:
                strUrl = "https://bing.com/"
            default:
                break;
            reloadWebViewWithUrl(strUrl);
        func reloadWebViewWithUrl(strUrl: NSString){
            var url = NSURL(string: strUrl);
            var request = NSURLRequest(URL: url!);
            wbView.loadRequest(request);
        override func viewDidLoad() {
            super.viewDidLoad()
            // Do any additional setup after loading the view, typically from a nib.
        override func didReceiveMemoryWarning() {
            super.didReceiveMemoryWarning()
            // Dispose of any resources that can be recreated.
How should I go about changing this two allow my buttons to be in their own ViewController and still be able to to the secondary View Controller with the WebViewer?
Thank You all in advanced with the help on this!

This is the FirstViewController Code
import UIKit
class FirstViewController: UIViewController {
    @IBAction func webAction(sender: UIButton) {
        let index = sender.tag
        chosenURLString = addresses[index]
        performSegueWithIdentifier("WebViewSegue", sender: self)
    override func prepareForSegue(segue: UIStoryboardSegue, sender: AnyObject?) {
        if let controller = segue.destinationViewController as?
            SecondViewController {
            controller.urlString = chosenURLString
            chosenURLString = nil
    private let addresses = ["", "https://www.google.com", "https://www.facebook.com", "https://spca.org", "https://www.facebook.com/wagzpack?fref=photo"]
    private var chosenURLString: String?
This is the SecondViewController Code
import UIKit
class SecondViewController: UIViewController {
    @IBOutlet var webSite: UIWebView!
    var urlString: String?
    override func viewDidLoad() {
        super.viewDidLoad()
        if let urlString = urlString {
            if let url = NSURL(string: urlString) {
                let request = NSURLRequest(URL: url)
                webSite.loadRequest(request)
                println("loading \(urlString)")
            else {
                println("badly formed URL string.")
        else {
            println("missing URL string.")

Is there a way to set the default Initial View to Bookmarks Panel and Page on word documents that I save as PDF?

When I save my word 2013 documents as Adobe PDF I have to open the PDF up, go to File>Properties>Initial View>Navigation Tab and then set the initial view as Bookmark Panel and Page; it gets pretty tedious.
I use Save as Adobe PDF rather than Print to Adobe PDF Printer because I like being able to have the security settings automatically set.
I just want to be able to save my word document as Adobe PDF with the initial view already set as Bookmark Panel and Page, and with security, so I can send it out immediately.
Is this possible?
Thank you.

Use the Firefox Android Addon - Phony
*https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/addon/phony
for more
*https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/

Initial View - Default Setup (Acrobat 9.0 Pro)

Hi everyone,
This may be a dumb question but I just can't seem to find how to change the default page number in the "Initial View" tab - under Document Properties.
My pdfs are always opening up on page 4 (small thing - but annoying!). I can change the value to "1" for each pdf, but I don't want to have to do this everytime i generate a pdf.
There must be a way to change the default value from "4" to "1" (I hope).
Can anyone help with this?
Thank you,
Tina

Never mind - I just found the option under "Save PDF" that allows me to select the page number.
Just didn't expect it to be there ... sorry about that !
tvb

Initial view controller changes automatically

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for