Insert workflow for a particular Business requirement

Hi,
We have a requirement wherein we do not have SSHR and people are assigned to enter the absences of the employees. But still we need an approval from manager.
As per my understanding, we will have to create a new workflow and the same should be called when the absence is entered for the employee. Once the manager approves it the oracle tables should be updated.
Could you please let me know how exactly can this be done. How wll we link the seeded form to call the custom workflow and ultimately call the API if it is approved.
Thanks,
Amit

I am signing up to this one just in case an answer comes along; it sounds interesting.
Thanks,
USA

Similar Messages

How to find tables for a particular business object.

Dear Friends,
I want to display, all the tables related to a particular business object.
So I think there must be way of doing it using packages.
example:-
I will have list of all packages referencing to all business Components
(ex.SALES) then i will get a list of all the tables related to SALES and then I would like to get all the METADATA regarding that TABLE.
please give me some ideas How to achieve this.
thanks,
jeevan

hai Naveen ,
Thanks for the reply.
I had gone through the Link.
I want to know "How could I get the list of all the Tables of a particular Business Component"
like suppose i entered Sales i sould get all the tables related to Sales ....if MM then list of MM tables...
in Se80 the package VA is for sales .....
and there i can get all the tables for sales...
but If u know any searching criteria by which i will be able to the list of tables.
thx,
jeevan

Immediate CENVAT Utilization for a particular business process

HI Friends,
The Business requirement is that a single Excise invoice number should be generated for the plant be it domestic or Export Transactions. So we have accordingly maintained a single series group.
The client requires immediate utilization of CENVAT in case of Export under rebate claim alone and for other transactions it would done at month end. As utilization is based on series group can you please suggest how to over come the issue.
Regards
KS

No answered received

Change authorization to a user for a particular Business Partner Role

Hi,
My requirement is simple. I have two set of users in my project.
Set A will be
1- Creating business partners with role Prospect
2- Changing PROSPECT business partners's master data
3- Display it
Set B will be
1- Changing and Displaying all business partners irrespective of their roles (prospect, sold to party, employee.)
When I grant access the authorization object B_BUPA_RLT with ACTVT 01, 02, 03 and BP Role BUP002 (Prospect) only (for Set A) to a PFCG role, the user who has that PFCG role can still change any business partner irrespective of the business partner's role.
Authorization object CRM_BPROLE is inactive in my PFCG role here, as per my understanding, it is used for checking if a user has authorization to assign a BP role to A BP (Not a big of concern here). Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I studied badi BADI_CRM_BP_UIU_AUTHORITY and enhancement implementation BADI_CRM_BP_FILTER_ATTRIBUTE but none of them seem to fit in to my requirement.
Do you have an idea/recommendation on how to proceed from here? Or am I missing something big which should be right in front of my eye?
Thanks for your time,

Hey Glenn, thanks for your input.
Here are my active assignments (and my ideas about the usage of authorization in parenthesis)
B_BUPA_RLT
ACTVT: 03 Role: BUP002, CRM000, CRM002, CRM003, CRM004, ZCRM000 (the user is authorized to display six all roles)
ACTVT: 01, 02 Role: BUP002 (the user is authorized to create a business partner only in BUP002 role. He/she is authorized to change a business partner's data only if BP has role BUP002 assigned to)
CRM_BPROLE:
ACTVT: 01, 02, 03 Role: BUP002 (If BP has BUP002 role only, user is authorized to change/display BP's data)
With that authorization info, the user can still change a BP who has CRM000 (and not BUP002 role). How can I achieve that the user should have the authorization to change the BP's with role BUP002, and not BP's with other roles?
Additional experience: In the situation below, user cannot change any BP's master data.
B_BUPA_RLT
ACTVT: 03 Role: BUP002, CRM000, CRM002, CRM003, CRM004, ZCRM000 (
ACTVT: 01 Role: BUP002
CRM_BPROLE:
ACTVT: 01, 02, 03 Role: BUP002
But when I grant B_BUPA_RLT ACTVT: 02 Role: BUP002 only, I happen to come the very first situation, as he/she can change all BP's master data.

Workflows for Books of Business

I am trying to build a workflow that places records into our company books according to who the user is. I think I can do this off of either the User Name or User Role.
So far I have built the following:
Record Type = Account
Trigger Event = When new record saved
Workflow Rule Condition:
[<Owner>] = 'Rzeldin' OR 'JSchmuke'
When I do this, it correctly routes the new RZeldin Account records, but it does not route the JSchuke records. I need include a sequence of users who belong to the book in the Rule. I have 125 user in the company that I need to route to thier particular book. How can this be done? Is there an easier way to do this that what I have started?
Many thanks,
RAZ

So I have built this and it's not working:
UserValue('<BusinessUnit>') = Materials Handling and Construction AND UserValue('<BusinessUnitLevel1>') LIKE "Construction*"
I want it read: User is in Business Unit Materials Handling and Construction and also Business Unit Level 1 contains the word "Construction"
We have several Business Unit Level 1 values with Construction, but I want it to capture them all.
Can someone please tell me what's wrong with the expression?

Need to find a workflow for the following business process

dear expert:
as we have SD,MM,PP for multiple plant and everybodys work is interdependent with others we find highly challenging to make it synchronised. to manage the situation i thought if we can create an workflow where every event of individual person will trigger and send notification to other members to start his job. the following is a scenerio where i tried to show the sequence of work and respective user module as responsible. please suggest is there any workflow to control the same in sap.
Style
Color
FG create     SD
Customer info record     SD
Pricing master     SD
Ref. Bom     SD
Contract     SD
Create Sales order     SD
Create PP matetial (Cut Pnl, Print Pnl, Emb Pnl, Sweing gmt)     PP
Create PP BOM(Create different BOM for Dfferent Material)     PP
Create Routing     PP
MRP run     PP
Purchase Requisition     MM
Purchase Order     MM

Dear,
If you have ABAP team with you, an email to user SAP inbox will trigger from each transaction.
We implemented this for PR level for each 1200 individual user / management release authorities, which informs by an email about the status of PR. once the final release done based on purchase group - an email will trigger to central procurement department all responsible persons indicating purchase order awaiting.
NOW material rejection - reference to 122 and 102 movement is under study. Once any material rejected the system send email to procurement, stores personnel and management informing the material was rejected.
Similar, based on the presentations and indepth meeting held with ABAP and FUNCTIONAL teams, workflow can be trigger on each event (not sure the all processes you mentioned in your post). But I hope possibility exists.
THE ONLY POINT YOU SHOULD KEEP IN MIND AND INFORM MANAGEMENT - SYSTEM PERFORMANCE WILL AFFECT A LOT. SYSTEM WILL SLOW DOWN AS MANY WORKFLOWS EXISTS. CONSULT BASIS TEAM ALSO.
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

Free of charge item processing - France business requirement

Hi,
For free of charge sales, the net value of an item is made to zero using free item category in the sales order and the billing with zero value is released to accounting.
One of the requirements for France is for Free of charge items, though the value of the product is zero, the relevant tax codes needs to be transmitted from SD to FI so that the tax value(zero) + tax code details will be available in the VAT reporting.
It looks the OSS notes 34526 - Delivery free of charge and value-added tax provides recommendation to resolve the above requirements. Have anyone implemented the solution based on this OSS note or used any other approach? The condition type Z002 provided as example in the note, reducing value of the net value instead of negating tax value.
Appreciate any feedback on this.
Regards,

Thanks for responding. Below are my responses,
How ( with which tables and fields ) you are developing VAT report in FI?.Why I am asking is,with tax code only we can track the tax amount in FI level.If the tax code related data is zero then how and what based on can we get that data in FI level to develop a report?.
I consulted the same with FI colleagues and per their response, an entry has to be made in the BSET table in order for the VAT report to populate the relevant tax code and values. As mentioned in the caption of the thread, it is for our French business requirement. Our business users indicated that when a product is sent as delivery free of charge, they wanted to show the details in VAT reporting (I am not an VAT expert, and not an expert with French laws). We have added tax codes for relevant taxes, including zero tax and followed the recommendation provided in the OSS note that I have mentioned earlier.
Why dont you want to develop a VAT report in SD module ?.Do you have any issues over there ( in SD ) ?
Our requirement is NOT to develop the VAT from SD module, however FI folks asked to pass the tax code/tax value from SD transactions (billing document to FI). Hence I raised this thread in SD area to see whether anyone has accomplished a solution for this similar requirements.
Thanks,

Solution for :SIGNIFICANT "BUFFER BUSY WAITS" FOR AN PARTICULAR AQ TABLE

Hi,
My customer is observing buffer busy waits for a particular table we have these options to remove this:
Buffer busy waits are common in high volume AQ systems (just the way the
AQ works),
so what options do we have to reduce this contention
1. Iis partitioning supported
2. should we unlock the stats and gather them
3. any custom indexes that can be used to help reduce
4. any changes to segment storage options
WE require answer very fast. Many thanks in advance!!!

906748 wrote:
Hi,
My customer is observing buffer busy waits for a particular table we have these options to remove this:
Buffer busy waits are common in high volume AQ systems (just the way the
AQ works),
so what options do we have to reduce this contention
1. Iis partitioning supported
2. should we unlock the stats and gather them
3. any custom indexes that can be used to help reduce
4. any changes to segment storage optionsHow does this performance issue relate specifically to the o-o tehnology of PL/SQL and SQL?
WE require answer very fast. Many thanks in advance!!!Then use Oracle Support. That is what PAID support is for.
Or do you expect professionals with jobs, spending their free time to assist others here, to simply stop doing what they get paid to do, and jump to your demands for an urgent resolution for you problem... for free?
Think again.

Business object for material , template workflow for materials ?

Hi,
I need to create a workflow for material master , creating material basic data, create plant views etc
Which is the appropriate workflow and is there a standard one as a template?
Thanks
Antonis

Hello,
I feel it is better that you use the standard business object BUS1001006 for your requirement related to the material management as some of the events which are obsolete in the business object BUS1001 have been redefined in BUS1001006.
Events like "Material created" and "New View for the material Created" are redefined which I think you need for your requirement.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Samson

Custom Workflow for User Requirment

hi ,
i am creating a workflow for which is custom .
i have 1 module pool program where i have 7 fields.
User can create the data and save it .
once he save the Data the workflow should trigger.
i have created a Z business object wherein i have created 4 key fields and 3 attributes according to data in the custom table
the BO has no supertype. and created 1 event save
now my question is where should i write the code for triggering the workflow on the save of the entries in the module pool program. and i am also i am responsible for showing the approver in the table after the decision is taken in workflow activtiy
please suggest
Thanks on advance
Chitis

Hi,
Even i haven't worked on such requirement.
I know how to trigger a workflow or start a workflow through customization.
But i like to know in case of module pool programming where I am supposed to write the code?
Whether in PAI or PBO or anywere else?
Let us know.
Thanks,
Raj

Approval workflow for external requirement

Hi,
My company already implements Project System and Plant Maintenance, in which we generate PR from those modules, and the PR will be subject to release strategy.
At the moment we want to implement SRM 7.0 and we're planning to use Plan Driven Procurement scenario for the requirement generated automatically from PS or PM. As we can have a release strategy for PR generated from module PM and PS, can we have approval workflow for external requirement in SRM?
Josh

Yes you can but not by standard (Since itu2019s not out of box functionality), on the other hand itu2019s real simple to do an RFC call to your external system and get the agentu2019s information...
All SRM need is only agent ID (User ID) to which the work item need to be assigned...
We too have same scenario i.e. business want to use R/3 release group determination which they have already... we implemented it and working real good...
Let me know if you have any questions...
Thanks!!
Bharath

Any ideas for this Business requirement

Hi All,
Just wondering to see if any of you have encountered the following business requirement and if so how we can address it.
Business Requirement:
(1) Distribution Centers(DC Plant) maintains a relationship with the Factory(Production Plant) that can allow for the swapping of planned production of one product with the planned production of another product. This relation can allow for the partial or complete swapping of one unit of planned production with another in the group.
Example: Product Group1 has 2 products underneath it- Product A and Product B
n= Current period (Month)
n+1= Next period.........
After n+4 periods, the production qty are as follows:
Prod qty@ Product A = 10
Prod qty@ Product B = 30
Hence the Production Qty@ Product Group 1 = 20+20 = 40 ( Aggregation of the prod qty from products to product group level)
The swap of production can be btw Product A and Product B and should not exceed the total Production Qty for the product group
Some examples can be:
Prod qty@ Product A = 15
Prod qty@ Product B = 25
Total Prod Qty@ Product group 1= 40
Prod qty@ Product A = 20
Prod qty@ Product B = 20
Total Prod Qty@ Product group 1= 40
Prod qty@ Product A = 30
Prod qty@ Product B = 10
Total Prod Qty@ Product group 1= 40
etc etc........lot of combinationsu2014The above examples are for understanding the requirement.
However let us say the business determines a planned % of swap btw the products:
Example:
Total Prod Qty@ Product group 1= 40
Swap % = 10%
Then the new Production Qty with the Swap% are as follows:
Prod qty@ Product A = 10 + (10*10/100) = 11
Prod qty@ Product B = 30 + ( 30*10/100) = 33
(2) The other requirement is that the ATP check of the Sales Orders should take into account the Production qty with swap% at the individual product level and also constrain it with the total production qty for the Product group
Example: Let us say we have a
SALES ORDER for Product A for Requested Qty=40
SALES ORDER for Product B for Requested Qty=40
The confirmation for the above 2 sales orders should be as follows:
Confirmation for SALES ORDER for Product A =11 qty
Confirmation for SALES ORDER for Product B =29 Qty
The total confirmation is still equal to the original production qty for the Product Group= 40 qty
Thanks
Kumar

Kumar
I dont know what flexibility you have in building the solution - are you looking at a greenfield from-scratch solution or do you already have a ltechnical andscape that you need to work with ?
If its the former then here is what might work -
1. Using APO DP, you generate a 'Sales' Forecast (based on statistical models + adjustments). This is a statement of unconstrained independent demand, for the products they actually expect to sell.
2. Using SNP, you (optionally) check the sales forecast for capacity.
3. As part of the S&OP process, you make any adjustments in DP to develop a 'Consensus' (and optionally constrained) Demand Plan.
4. Within DP, in the very near term you disallow any changes to the Consensus Demand Plan ('Frozen' Horizon) since it would be too late for manufacturing to react to changes. In the medium term ('Slushy' horizon), you allow changes only within the Product Group, using the swapping process you describe. Further out (Liquid horizon), you follow steps 1 through 3, with any changes acceptable.
5. Usng GATP, you can use the same forecast created within step 1 or 4 to limit what can be ordered using Product Allocation.If the products within the product group are interchangeable from a customers perspective, then you can use Rules Based ATP to switch products.
Rishi Menon

BOM business requirement for sales order and PGI

Hi Experts,
Current setting
The BOM structure is A = A1+A2
1) Material A created in MM master item category group = ERLA
2) Sub component material A1 and material A2, MM master item category group = NORM for both component.
3) Maintained in CS01 BOM header is A and items are A1 and A2.
4) Item category in IMG was created and assign item category also created.
    4.1) OR-ERLA-TAQ-TAE
new business requirement as listed below.
5) The material A is alway zero quantity on hand, no goods receipt required with no physical with such material or package at all. (it is dummy material number in SAP).
6) while SO created.
    6.1) Fro material A sales price captured at BOM header level only, NO QTY and COSTshow in the sales order.
     6.2) Material A1 and A2 are actual physical inventory item in the ware house.
     6.3) The sub component of material A1 and A2 is required to captured QTY and COST. NO SALES PRICES NEEDED.
CONCLUSION
HOW to setup/configure such a business scenario?
- Is it logic to configure as OR-ERLA-TAE-TAN that's what i think of?
My problem is how to make the material A is alway ZEROS stock on hand and allow in sales order creation with ZEROS order qty?
MATERIAL                                          QTY                             COST                                  SALES NET VALUE
       A                                                      0                                   0                                              1,500.00
       A1                                                    1                                  100.00                                           0
       A2                                                    1                                    50.00                                           0
Thanks & Regards,
Yong Kok Wah
Edited by: Yong Kok Wah on Jan 27, 2010 11:16 AM

As per your post,
- You are creating Main item which is a dummy material without any physical inventory maintained, but the pricing/billing should be done @ main item level.
- here you are not dispatching main item, but billing should be carried at this level. in such case, I suggest you to go with the new sch.line cat w/o maintaining any mov type to it. & use Zitem category for this main item in VOV7, mark "Order qtty=1" so that min order qtty for this main item should be 1, so that you can calculate price.
- You want to capture Cost of sub items , summation of sub items cost is total cost of main item & Profit will be calculated accordingly.
Sub items, sch.line category should have mov type, item cat should be not relevant for pricing & billing , but relevant for sch.lines. In Copy control from delivery - Billing @ item level, for the main item ,- item category, choose "Cumulate cost", so that cost of the sub items will be cumulated to main item.
eg:
MATERIAL QTY COST SALES NET VALUE
A 0 0 1,500.00
A1 1 100.00 0
A2 1 50.00 0
My problem is how to make the material A is alway ZEROS stock on hand and allow in sales order creation with ZEROS order qty?
To avoid this, mark order qtty=1, in item category for main item, but for the same item, sch.line category should not have mov type. so that there will nt be any PGI document. But PGI should be done for sub items to capture inventory & cost.
Test & revert, if any issues.

How to remove Requirement of SL in Delivery for a particular Sales area

Hi Friends
I have customised supplementary order type, delivery type and billing type. In supplemntary delivry item category, the relevance for picking, storage location required, determine storage location, fields are unchecked. It works well with a particular customr and for a particular sales area, particular materials. In delivery, we have PGI and saved delivery. Delivry did not have picking and it did not ask for any storage location.
But when I am trying to create the same supplementary order type for a different customer and different sales area and scrap material, the delivery has no picking but its asking for storage location to do PGI. Pls tell me what I have to do to remove the requiremnt for storage location in delivery for this particular sales area.
Thanks
sangeeta

Hi Bhaskar
In VL01N, in delivery item, for scrap material, item category is coming as ZSUP. Because the item category for delivery is also maintained as ZSUP. In this Item category, the fields mentioned below are deactivated.
Relevant for picking
SLOC required
Determine SLOC
In material master for scrap, in Sales org2, item category grp is NORM, like all other material.
Thus storage location is not supposed to come in VL01n as a required field.
But in delivery item category determination, i did not find this item category zsup. But when I was making supplementary delivery for other materials, the system did not ask any storage location and supplymentary delivery is duly created. here we delivering from an order not SA.
Thanks
Sangeeta

Business requirement Questioneer/checklist for New Company Code Creation

Experts,
Can anyone provide Business requirement Questioneer/ Checklist or say all the factors to be considered for New Company Code Creation from user's point of view.
this questioneer we will send to User department to specify all the requirements and add if required.
Eg; Fiscal year definition, Posting period, Doc. types, etc.
Please provide full list to be considered before we go ahead.
- Nilesh

Dear Vivek,
Actually I need the factors to be considered while defining Co. Code settings.
All such factors which will guide us (SAP Team) how to design parameters in the Co. Code.
We will send this questioneer to User Department to fill up and on that basis we will conclude our design Parameters.
Please help.
- Nilesh

Insert workflow for a particular Business requirement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for