Inserting records that have a timestamp

I have a table with field1 as "timestamp with timezone". The bulk records I am trying to load have timestamp format = "YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS.FF". I altered the session nls_timestamp_format to "YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS.FF", but get 'bad month' when loading the tables. If I add the (to_timestamp(2005-02-25 14:12:22.003222)), I can load the record without an error. I don't want to add the 'to_timestamp to thousand of records. How can I alter the nls_timestamp_format and it allow me to insert all the records.
Thanks in advance

what according to you represents the current record?
Please Mark This As Answer if it helps to solve the issue Visakh ---------------------------- http://visakhm.blogspot.com/ https://www.facebook.com/VmBlogs

Similar Messages

Find all records that have character alone in a string

Oracle 10g Enterprise Edition
Hi all,
I must select from a varchar2 field, all the records that have a character (number or char) alone in the string.
For example.
ASDF BHGR H RR (yes, cause "H")
ASDF BHGR H4 R (yes, cause "R")
ASDF B H4 DDR (yes, cause "B")
ASDF B H4 DDR (yes, cause "B")
ASDF BC 1 DDR (yes, cause "1")
ASDF BC / DDR (yes, cause "/")
ASDF BHGR H4 RR (no)
ASDF (no)
I'm trying by SubStr, but I cannot generally solutions.
Thank's for any suggestion.
Ciao

Ok, just a try :
SQL> with tbl as
2 (select 'ASDF BHGR H RR' str from dual union all
3   select 'ASDF BHGR H4 R' str from dual union all
4   select 'ASDF B H4 DDR' str from dual union all
5   select 'ASDF BHGR H4 R1' str from dual union all
6   select 'ASDF BHGR H4' str from dual union all
7   select 'ASDF - H4' str from dual union all
8   select 'a1 ASDF BHGR H4' str from dual union all
9   select 'ASDF B H4 DDR' str from dual union all
10   select 'ASDF BC 1 DDR' str from dual union all
11   select 'ASDF BC / DDR' str from dual)
12 select str,
13         decode(regexp_instr(str,'^. | . | .$'),0,'no',decode(regexp_instr(str,'^- | - | -$'),0,'yes','no')) res
14 from tbl;
STR             RES
ASDF BHGR H RR yes
ASDF BHGR H4 R yes
ASDF B H4 DDR   yes
ASDF BHGR H4 R1 no
ASDF BHGR H4    no
ASDF - H4       no
a1 ASDF BHGR H4 no
ASDF B H4 DDR   yes
ASDF BC 1 DDR   yes
ASDF BC / DDR   yes
10 rows selected.May is there is a simpler way.
Nicolas.

Include those records that have Null End Dates

I have to pull a report that show those who are currently working so we are assuming those with no End Dates are still working. When I put '0' or '0/0/00' for the End Date I get an error stating I need to put in a date.
How do I only include those records that have Null End Dates? Ultimately I need a count of those currently employed. So I'm assuming once my report only shows those records I can add a running total field.
I have Crystal XI.
Thanks

Try entering some default value for null like enter a default date "1/1/1900" which means that the end date is null.
Now in the record selection write the condition like this
if {?EndDateParameter}=date(1900,1,1) then
(isnull(datefield)=true or totext(datefield)="")
else
datefield={?EndDateParameter}
Regards,
Raghavendra

Extract only records that have difference sum

Hi all. I'm on oracle 10g.
I have a question. I have two select statement, both with sum function.
I want that from first select I must retrieve only records which have different sum.
Here is the code:
first select statement
select a.codice_contratto codice_contratto, a.codice_qualifica codice_qualifica,
a.codice_istituzione codice_istituzione, sum(a.nume_dip_tot) tot, sum(a.nume_dip_donne) donne
from tn_bz_t_10 a
where a.anno = 2006
group by a.codice_contratto, a.codice_qualifica, a.codice_istituzione
order by a.codice_contratto, a.codice_qualifica, a.codice_istituzione
secon select statement
select codice_contratto, codice_qualifica,
codice_istituzione,
sum(nume_dip_tot17) tot, sum(nume_dip_donne17) donne
from tabella10
where anno = 2006
and versione = 'D'
and nume_dip_tot17 <> 0
group by codice_contratto, codice_qualifica, codice_istituzione
order by codice_contratto,codice_qualifica,codice_istituzione
My goal is that from first select I must retrieve only those records which have difference sum, tot or donne,
from second select...
How can I achieve that??
Thanks all for collaboration,
Fabrizio Delli Priscoli
Edited by: Fabrizio Delli Priscoli on 23-set-2010 14.25

Hi, Fabrizio,
(1) an inner join, or
(2) NOT IN
are two ways that will probably be efficient.
You've been using this forum for nearly 9 years, so you know that, to get a more detailed answer, you need to post a more detailed question.
Post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements) and the results you want from that data.
Format your code and results, and post them between \ tags to keep this site from removing the extra spaces.
Always say what version of Oracle you're using.

Display total of contents of 'fields a' for records that have identical 'fields b' in common

Please forgive me for my inability to put this in simple
terms. I tried to search the forums for a solution but when you
can't formulate your question in a pithy manner it's nigh
impossible!
I am attaching code for a query that grabs all the records in
a few tables that relate to workshops that have been attended but
not yet paid for. What I want to do with them next is to add the
"WorkshopCost" field for each of the records that has an identical
"SchoolName" and display the result, so that we have a subtotal for
each school.
I suspect this should probably be very easy but for some
reason I can't figure out how it should be accomplished - if there
is another posting where this is answered I would be very happy is
someone would point it out! or otherwise give me a shove in the
right direction.
I'm thinking I need to do something with the array created by
my query...?

If I am understanding correctly, you would like to display a
subtotal for each school. A simple option is to use the "group"
attribute of cfquery. Then you could calculate the subtotal as you
loop through the results and display it after each section. Another
option is to use a QoQ.
Keep in mind that when using "group", your sql query
must order the results the same way. In other words, if you
are grouping by "s_SchoolName" then your query must also ORDER BY
s_SchoolName. Otherwise, the results will display incorrectly.

Returning only records that have no entry in a specific field

Hello,
I'm new to this forum and relatively new to Crystal Reports, so I apologize if this information is "plain as day" somewhere. I've been hunting for this info for quite a while and can't find anything that makes sense!
I am trying to put together a very simple report that will return only records where a certain field is blank.
It is an Access database, in an information management program specific to our type of business. CR 11 software was included with the LIMS (Laboratory Information Management System), as the reports generated from the LIMS software are in CR. I've learned enough to be able to tweak reports and make some basic reports, but I can't find a simple answer to what I think is a simple question!
I have the report set up to access the following fields in the database: Invoice number, Client name, Due date, Invoice amount, and Payment Received. This will be used as a "cross check" - not as any major accounting tool - as the Payment Received field is simply the date that the payment was received. If no payment has been received, the field is left blank.
I want the report to return ONLY those records where that field is blank (i. e. a list of invoices/clients whose payment has not yet been received).
Ideally, I would also like to be able to return only those records where that field is blank OR within a certain date range (i. e. less than 30 days from the date that the report is run). However, we'll probably only use this report a couple of times a month, so that is not as critical.
I know I need to filter the records according to the Payment Received field, but don't know how to construct a formula that says "just show the fields where there is nothing entered."
Thank you!
Brenda

This is the hardest function to find: IsNull
If isNull(field) then
    // if the above fails on a numberic field or text field then see the following two-some databases are picky.
If IsNull(field) or field=0 then //this one maybe needed for a numeric field
If IsNull(field) or field=""    // this one maybe needed for a text field
if IsNull(field) or field=<value>
or
if IsNull(field) or field like <value*>
You always want the IsNull statement to be the first statement, and it is especially usefull when testing for not equal
If IsNull(field) or field <> <value>

Stuck on sql query to find parent records that have the same child records

Oracle 10gR2 Enterprise Edition.
Hi,
I'm trying to write some logic to look for records in a parent table, which have the exact same values in a child table.
This is part of a bigger query, but I'm stuck on this part for now, so I've mocked up some simplified tables below to capture the core of the
problem I'm stuck on.
Let say I've got a parent table Manager, a child table Employee and there's a many to many relationship between them.
The aptly named Join_Table handles the relationship between them. So one manager can manage many employees, one employee can be managed by
many managers.
I've a feeling this is stupidly easy, but I seem to be suffering from a bad bout of brain freeze today!
-- parent table
CREATE TABLE manager (
id      number primary key,
name      varchar2(100));
-- child table
CREATE TABLE employee (
id          number primary key,
name      varchar2(100));
-- link table
CREATE TABLE join_table (
manager_id          NUMBER,
employee_id      NUMBER,
CONSTRAINT join_table_pk PRIMARY KEY (manager_id, employee_id),
CONSTRAINT manager_fk FOREIGN KEY (manager_id) REFERENCES manager(id),
CONSTRAINT employee_fk FOREIGN KEY (employee_id) REFERENCES employee(id)
-- Insert some managers
INSERT INTO manager (id, name) VALUES (1, 'John');
INSERT INTO manager (id, name) VALUES (2, 'Bob');
INSERT INTO manager (id, name) VALUES (3, 'Mary');
INSERT INTO manager (id, name) VALUES (4, 'Sue');
INSERT INTO manager (id, name) VALUES (5, 'Alan');
INSERT INTO manager (id, name) VALUES (6, 'Mike');
-- Insert some employees
INSERT INTO employee (id, name) VALUES (101, 'Paul');
INSERT INTO employee (id, name) VALUES (102, 'Simon');
INSERT INTO employee (id, name) VALUES (103, 'Ken');
INSERT INTO employee (id, name) VALUES (104, 'Kevin');
INSERT INTO employee (id, name) VALUES (105, 'Jack');
INSERT INTO employee (id, name) VALUES (106, 'Jennifer');
INSERT INTO employee (id, name) VALUES (107, 'Tim');
-- Insert the links
-- John manages Paul, Simon, Ken
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (1, 101);
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (1, 102);
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (1, 103);
-- Bob manages Paul, Simon, Kevin, Jack
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (2, 101);
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (2, 102);
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (2, 104);
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (2, 105);
-- Mary manages Jennifer, Tim
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (3, 106);
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (3, 107);
-- Sue manages Jennifer, Tim
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (4, 106);
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (4, 107);
-- Alan manages Paul, Simon, Ken, Jennifer, Tim
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (5, 101);
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (5, 102);
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (5, 103);
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (5, 106);
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (5, 107);
-- Mike manages Paul, Simon, Ken
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (6, 101);
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (6, 102);
INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (6, 103);
-- For sanity
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX employee_name_uidx ON employee(name);So if I'm querying for manager John, I want to find the other managers who manage the exact same list of employees.
Answer should be Mike.
If I'm querying for manager Mary, answer should be Sue.
This query will give me the list of managers who manage some of the same employees as John, but not the exact same employees...
SELECT DISTINCT m.name AS manager
FROM manager m, join_table jt, employee e
WHERE m.id = jt.manager_id
AND jt.employee_id = e.id
AND e.id IN (
     SELECT e.id
     FROM manager m, join_table jt, employee e
     WHERE m.id = jt.manager_id
     AND jt.employee_id = e.id
     AND m.name = 'John')
ORDER BY 1;I thought about using set operations to find managers whose list of employees minus my employees is null and where my employees minus their list of employees is null. But surely there's a simpler more elegant way.
Any ideas?
Btw, I need to run this as a batch job against tables with >20 million rows so query efficiency is key.

What about...
WITH manager_list AS
SELECT name,
        LTRIM(MAX(SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(id,','))
        KEEP (DENSE_RANK LAST ORDER BY curr),',') AS employees
FROM   (SELECT m.name,
                e.id,
                ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY m.name ORDER BY e.id) AS curr,
                ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY m.name ORDER BY e.id) -1 AS prev
         FROM   manager m,
                join_table jt,
                employee e
WHERE m.id           = jt.manager_id
AND   jt.employee_id = e.id
AND   m.name = :P_MANAGER)
GROUP BY name
CONNECT BY prev = PRIOR curr AND name = PRIOR name
START WITH curr = 1
), all_list AS
SELECT name,
        LTRIM(MAX(SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(id,','))
        KEEP (DENSE_RANK LAST ORDER BY curr),',') AS employees
FROM   (SELECT m.name,
                e.id,
                ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY m.name ORDER BY e.id) AS curr,
                ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY m.name ORDER BY e.id) -1 AS prev
         FROM   manager m,
                join_table jt,
                employee e
WHERE m.id           = jt.manager_id
AND   jt.employee_id = e.id)
GROUP BY name
CONNECT BY prev = PRIOR curr AND name = PRIOR name
START WITH curr = 1
SELECT a.*
FROM   manager_list m,
       all_list a
WHERE m.employees = a.employeesWould be easier in 11g, but I don't have an installation here so this is based on 10g.
Cheers
Ben

Trying to find a record that does not have an event created for it

Post Author: tzinser
CA Forum: Formula
A little background on how it works....
We create a record, and everytime it is created, a number of "events" within that record are automatically created. The specific event I am trying to run a report on is "REC". I can run a report and get the information entered into the REC event no problem, but my problem is that if someone deletes the "REC" event it does not show up in my report.
So my question is, what is the best way to write a function that displays all records that have the "REC" event, and all records that the "REC" event is missing.
I'm using the generic funtion {EVENT.EventCode} = "REC" right now....any suggestions?

Post Author: tzinser
CA Forum: Formula
Okay, I left off a lot of important information...
I'm using two tables
TWDATA
EVENT
From TWDATA I'm pulling the fields TWDATA.OrderNumber and TWDATA.DisbursementDate
From EVENT I'm pulling the fields EVENT.EventCode and EVENT.CompletedDate
The two tables are linked by OrderNumber.

Retrieving latest updated or inserted records without using a trigger

I have to retrieve the latest updated/inserted records from a set of database tables. Say, if 'n' sets of different records have been updated or inserted into one or more different database tables then all the 'n' records of data should be retrieved using a java code without using a trigger.

helpmeplz wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
But I don't know when or from where or what kind of data gets inserted/updated into the tables. I need a listener or a component which can handle events occured on the particular set of database tables, and get the event data. the java code should get the updated/inserted rows that have been inserted into a set of database tables by a third party.
Please lemme know how I can do this.Realistically you can't.
If and only if the tables have a modification timestamp then you could use that. Every table would need it.
Other than that the only othe possibility would require that you keep an entire copy of each table in the memory, poll at a set interval and then do an entire comparison for each table. For very small data volumes (on the target tables) that is practical. For larger volumes it isn't.

SQ02 InfoSet Get Count of Total Number of Records that will be processed

I am developing a query (SQ01) and am currently working on building an InfoSet (SQ02).
The Infoset was set up using a 'Direct read of table'. Next, I'm adding some various fields and then going to Extras and trying to define some code to get the total number of records that my query will be processing. I'm not sure if SAP pulls a filtered result set into a temporary table (by default - if so how could I reference it?) that I can reference or is just pulling in a row at a time in the record processing code, but my question is in regards to getting a record count of how many records are returned in my result set PRIOR TO going through all of the records.
Overall, I'd like to be able to have a field that says Record X of Y. I can get the X part for each line, but cannot get 'Y' until the very end. Any help or ideas would be much appreciated. I've looked around a bunch, but haven't found anything like what I'm requesting.
Query Output would look something like:
Record X1 of Y | Title1 | Amount1
Record X2 of Y | Title2 | Amount2

Hi Subin,
     I have tossed around this idea in my head, but am trying to figure out how to get the values and selection options from the query screen to incorporate into my Select statement within my infoset. The problem I'm running into is that my user enters a group of account numbers and an ending date that has to be pulled from the SQ01 query screen to the SQ02 infoset code. I've looked around for examples on pulling the data from the query screen, but have been unsuccessful thus far. Say for instance I have 15 specific accounts that the user is entering in and they want any records that have been submitted prior to the end of the current month and the start of the business year.
     On my query screen they would enter in something like
Business Year: 2011
Reporting End Date: <= 31.03.2011 (Which equates to all records between 01.01.2011 AND 31.03.2011)
Account #s: 0000, 0001, 0003, 0005, ..., 9999 (These are a variable amount of accounts entered and could include options such as not equal to or even between ranges etc)
In my START-OF-SELECTION code I would need a select like:
NOTE: This is just a pseudo code format, not checked for syntax here
SELECT count(*)
FROM TABLE
WHERE BusinessYear = '2011' AND
    RecordDate Between 01.01.2011 AND 31.03.2011 AND
    Accounts IN (0000, 0001, 0003, 0005, ..., 9999).
So In this select I need to reference the values in the SQ01. How would I reference the account #'s and whether or not the user has entered an account number and said Not Equal on it etc. This select statement would have to be built on the fly, since it's not guaranteed to be the same for each run.
Thanks,
Mark

Delete inserted record

I bulid trigger in tabel and check condition, if for example check_statment = X i need to delete inserted record (that mead not insert record) and when check_statment = Y then insert record in table, i try to write delete statment and rollback but there is error appear that the current record are reserved.
How i can solve it.

1. Triggers cannot Issues ROLLBACK, SAVEPOINT, COMMIT statements.
2. I guess you are trying to avoid duplicate records, Create a unique index on the key(col1,col2) which you want to prevent duplicates on.
3. Or you can Add a column Flag Chr(1) to your table. While inserting you allow the records to get inserted, but based on your condition change the Flag to 'D' - deleted , 'A' -active. Build a View which the user uses for application filtering out the 'D'eleted records.
Does this look like what you are trying to do !
Ss

Plsql query to list cases that have failed to create listing records

i would like to create a query as follows
Give me all docket_num (whose batch_id's are =11051) from Import_case table
which do not have listing records on Listing_Table (either they don't exist at all
or if the do; the create_date in the Listing table is null OR cretae_date on Lsting table not = record_process_date on Import_case table.
-------- x ---------------
Import_case Table
==============
1. import_case_id number(38) primary key
2. batch_id number
3. record_processed_date date
4. docket_num varchar2(17)
case_master Table
=================
1. case_master_id number(38) primary key
2. docket_num varchar2(17)
Listing Table
==========
1. Listing_id number(38) primary key
2. case_master_id number(38)
3. created_date timestamp(6)
note: case_master table is a link between Import_case Table and Listing table
where docket_num on import_case table = docket_num on case_master
and case_master_id on case_master = case_master_id on Listing Table
Please reply at your earliest. Thanking you. Arvind Modi.

I have used following query, which gives me list of docket numbers on Import case Table; which don't have Listing records on Listing Table.
========================================================
select
ic.import_case_id as "IMP_CASE_ID",
ic.batch_id as "B_ID",
ic.docket_num as "DOCKET#",
ic.insert_timestamp as "INS_DT",
ic.record_processed_timestamp as "REC_PROCESS_DT",
ic.next_date as "NEXT DT"
from daoimp.import_case ic
-- ** insert Batch id ** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
where ic.batch_id=11051
-- ** insert Batch id ** <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
minus
select
t.import_case_id as "IMP_CASE_ID",
t.batch_id as "B_ID",
t.docket_num as "DOCKET#",
t.insert_timestamp as "INS_DT",
t.record_processed_timestamp as "REC_PROCESS_DT",
t.next_date as "NEXT DT"
from daoimp.import_case t,
case_master cm,
listing l
-- ** insert Batch id ** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
where t.batch_id=11051
-- ** insert Batch id ** <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
and
t.docket_num = cm.docket_num
and
cm.case_master_id = l.case_master_id
==================================================
The above query gives correct docket_numbers on Import_case table, but it also needs to include Docket numbers on Import_case Table
whose Listing records in Listing table contain NULL value in created_date
OR create_date on Listing table not equal record_process_date on Import_case Table.
---- x ----
Here is the actual request and above is my interpretation of it.
The goal of the task here is to create a tool. The tool can be run to check for missing listing records that were not created during the import process. When run, the tools returns a result set of records (docket_numbers) from the import case table that although processed on a particular date i.e., (record_process_date) do not have a matching listing record i.e., ( a listing record with a create_date equal to the record_process_date).
The ONLY VARIABLE PARAMETER NEEDED in this tool is the Batch ID for the import case table.
---- x ---
I am working on some other queries using inner join or outer join or not exists, but no success so far.
Please call me at my phone number or reply on my e-mail, if you like; so that I can clarify any issues.

How to insert a detail record that has more than one master record

I have a somewhat complex situation that I am triying to figure out. I have three tables A, B and C. Table C is a detail table that has a foreign key to table A and table B. There are is nothing else in table C (basically it's used to create a many to many relationship between A and B.
Now I have a application module method that based on some user provided data needs to insert records in tables A and B and link them using table C. I have view links (and associations) between A and C as well as B and C. I can easily go from A and insert (via the view link accessor) a record into C. My problem is that I don't know how to the take that same C row and add it to B as a detail.
I have kinda hacked it by creating a row in B, using postChanges to get it's primary key ID and set the attribute directly in C. It works but I was hoping to find a way to avoid calling postChanges possibly hundreds of times in a loop. I also cannot commit the AM until the process is completed.
I tried setting the "composition association" on both associations but that didn't work either.
Thanks

I'm not sure if this helps, but here's a web page which talks about Image I/O:
http://java.sun.com/products/java-media/jai/iio.html
For your problem, they have a sample solution which can read a specific page of a multi-page tiff file, so perhaps you could make a loop to read all of the pages:
http://java.sun.com/products/java-media/jai/forDevelopers/samples/MultiPageRead.java
Good luck!

Procedure require in DB:i want insert records in temp table(if that records are not exist in temptable)

i have one "LOGTABLE" having 3000 records, in this table daily 3-4 records will be inserted.this table have 11colums no primary key columns.
i created another temp table as "LOGTABLEMONITOR". (copied from "LOGTABLE" having 3000 records)
i am expecting which are inserting daily 3-4 records in "LOGTABLE" will be inserting temp table "LOGTABLEMONITOR" (if that 3-4 records are not exist in "LOGTABLEMONITOR")

SELECT <columns>
FROM LOGTABLE
EXCEPT
SELECT <columns>
FROM LOGTABLEMONITOR;
Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
MS SQL Consulting:
Large scale of database and data cleansing
Remote DBA Services:
Improves MS SQL Database Performance
SQL Server Integration Services:
Business Intelligence

HT1937 I have successfully restored my iPhone 3 gs( Ios ) by itunes. After activation it is asking for activation. When I am going for activation its saying that no SIM card is inserted, but I have already Ufone SIM card is inserted. I checked it with ot

I have successfully restored my iPhone 3 gs( Ios ) by itunes. After activation it is asking for activation. When I am going for activation its saying that no SIM card is inserted, but I have already Ufone SIM card is inserted. I checked it with other SIM card like Zong etc but the response was same i.e; no SIM card is inserted. It not catching the signals. I am trying to use my wifi to activate my iphone but it iss not processing then i used itunes to activate by it's again saying that no sim card is detected.
My all contacts and all data is in this mobile. Now Iam unable to contact anyone. Please help me. How can I sort it out?
Thank you
Regards
Wazir Ali

Well, if you did it yourself, then there is a chance that you damaged some other component inside the device that is causing your issue. The iPhone's are not user serviceable, and once you have opened the device you have voided any warranty and post-warranty support from Apple. I would try Google to see if you can find any other way to repair your device, as Apple will no longer look at it.

Inserting records that have a timestamp

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for