Extract only records that have difference sum

Hi all. I'm on oracle 10g.
I have a question. I have two select statement, both with sum function.
I want that from first select I must retrieve only records which have different sum.
Here is the code:
first select statement
select a.codice_contratto codice_contratto, a.codice_qualifica codice_qualifica,
a.codice_istituzione codice_istituzione, sum(a.nume_dip_tot) tot, sum(a.nume_dip_donne) donne
from tn_bz_t_10 a
where a.anno = 2006
group by a.codice_contratto, a.codice_qualifica, a.codice_istituzione
order by a.codice_contratto, a.codice_qualifica, a.codice_istituzione
secon select statement
select codice_contratto, codice_qualifica,
codice_istituzione,
sum(nume_dip_tot17) tot, sum(nume_dip_donne17) donne
from tabella10
where anno = 2006
and versione = 'D'
and nume_dip_tot17 <> 0
group by codice_contratto, codice_qualifica, codice_istituzione
order by codice_contratto,codice_qualifica,codice_istituzione
My goal is that from first select I must retrieve only those records which have difference sum, tot or donne,
from second select...
How can I achieve that??
Thanks all for collaboration,
Fabrizio Delli Priscoli
Edited by: Fabrizio Delli Priscoli on 23-set-2010 14.25

Hi, Fabrizio,
(1) an inner join, or
(2) NOT IN
are two ways that will probably be efficient.
You've been using this forum for nearly 9 years, so you know that, to get a more detailed answer, you need to post a more detailed question.
Post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements) and the results you want from that data.
Format your code and results, and post them between \ tags to keep this site from removing the extra spaces.
Always say what version of Oracle you're using.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

Similar Messages

  • Returning only records that have no entry in a specific field

    Hello,
    I'm new to this forum and relatively new to Crystal Reports, so I apologize if this information is "plain as day" somewhere.  I've been hunting for this info for quite a while and can't find anything that makes sense!
    I am trying to put together a very simple report that will return only records where a certain field is blank.
    It is an Access database, in an information management program specific to our type of business.  CR 11 software was included with the LIMS (Laboratory Information Management System), as the reports generated from the LIMS software are in CR.  I've learned enough to be able to tweak reports and make some basic reports, but I can't find a simple answer to what I think is a simple question! 
    I have the report set up to access the following fields in the database:  Invoice number, Client name, Due date, Invoice amount, and Payment Received.  This will be used as a "cross check" - not as any major accounting tool - as the Payment Received field is simply the date that the payment was received.  If no payment has been received, the field is left blank.
    I want the report to return ONLY those records where that field is blank (i. e. a list of invoices/clients whose payment has not yet been received).
    Ideally, I would also like to be able to return only those records where that field is blank OR within a certain date range (i. e. less than 30 days from the date that the report is run).  However, we'll probably only use this report a couple of times a month, so that is not as critical.
    I know I need to filter the records according to the Payment Received field, but don't know how to construct a formula that says "just show the fields where there is nothing entered."
    Thank you!
    Brenda

    This is the hardest function to find:  IsNull
    If isNull(field) then  
        //  if the above fails on a numberic field or text field then see the following two-some databases are picky.
    If IsNull(field) or field=0 then  //this one maybe needed for a numeric field
    If IsNull(field) or field=""    //  this one maybe needed for a text field
    if IsNull(field) or field=<value>
    or
    if IsNull(field) or field like <value*>
    You always want the IsNull statement to be the first statement, and it is especially usefull when testing for not equal
    If IsNull(field) or field <>  <value>

  • Include those records that have Null End Dates

    I have to pull a report that show those who are currently working so we are assuming those with no End Dates are still working. When I put '0' or '0/0/00' for the End Date I get an error stating I need to put in a date.
    How do I only include those records that have Null End Dates? Ultimately I need a count of those currently employed. So I'm assuming once my report only shows those records I can add a running total field.
    I have Crystal XI.
    Thanks

    Try entering some default value for null like enter a default date "1/1/1900" which means that the end date is null.
    Now in the record selection write the condition like this
    if {?EndDateParameter}=date(1900,1,1) then
    (isnull(datefield)=true or totext(datefield)="")
    else
    datefield={?EndDateParameter}
    Regards,
    Raghavendra

  • Find all records that have character alone in a string

    Oracle 10g Enterprise Edition
    Hi all,
    I must select from a varchar2 field, all the records that have a character (number or char) alone in the string.
    For example.
    ASDF BHGR H RR (yes, cause "H")
    ASDF BHGR H4 R (yes, cause "R")
    ASDF B H4 DDR (yes, cause "B")
    ASDF B H4 DDR (yes, cause "B")
    ASDF BC 1 DDR (yes, cause "1")
    ASDF BC / DDR (yes, cause "/")
    ASDF BHGR H4 RR (no)
    ASDF (no)
    I'm trying by SubStr, but I cannot generally solutions.
    Thank's for any suggestion.
    Ciao

    Ok, just a try :
    SQL> with tbl as
      2  (select 'ASDF BHGR H RR' str from dual union all
      3   select 'ASDF BHGR H4 R' str from dual union all
      4   select 'ASDF B H4 DDR' str from dual union all
      5   select 'ASDF BHGR H4 R1' str from dual union all
      6   select 'ASDF BHGR H4' str from dual union all
      7   select 'ASDF - H4' str from dual union all
      8   select 'a1 ASDF BHGR H4' str from dual union all
      9   select 'ASDF B H4 DDR' str from dual union all
    10   select 'ASDF BC 1 DDR' str from dual union all
    11   select 'ASDF BC / DDR' str from dual)
    12  select str,
    13         decode(regexp_instr(str,'^. | . | .$'),0,'no',decode(regexp_instr(str,'^- | - | -$'),0,'yes','no')) res
    14  from tbl;
    STR             RES
    ASDF BHGR H RR  yes
    ASDF BHGR H4 R  yes
    ASDF B H4 DDR   yes
    ASDF BHGR H4 R1 no
    ASDF BHGR H4    no
    ASDF - H4       no
    a1 ASDF BHGR H4 no
    ASDF B H4 DDR   yes
    ASDF BC 1 DDR   yes
    ASDF BC / DDR   yes
    10 rows selected.May is there is a simpler way.
    Nicolas.

  • Extraction from table that have currency ref

    Hi gurus,
    I’m trying to extract data from the table XX where the table contain field “Expenses” This field is referencing to Accounting Document Header (BKPF) table. This prevents me from creating a standard extractor to extract directly from the table XX. Can anyone please help me to solve this issue? Is there any work around for this issue?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Saravanan,
    2 options to overcome this problem:
    1. Create the datasource on the table excluding all the amount fields that have reference to other tables. Once you create the DS, append these fields and also append a currency field to the extract structure. Provide the curreyncy field in the extract structure as the reference to these amount fields. You will need to write code in User exit to populate these amount and currency fields which should not be tough.
    2. Create a structure and create a FM DS. This way, you can select all the data at once and the control is in your hands.
    The only problem with the second method is that delta is to be handled by the developer. Hope this helps.
    Thanks and Regards
    Subray Hegde

  • Display total of contents of 'fields a' for records that have identical 'fields b' in common

    Please forgive me for my inability to put this in simple
    terms. I tried to search the forums for a solution but when you
    can't formulate your question in a pithy manner it's nigh
    impossible!
    I am attaching code for a query that grabs all the records in
    a few tables that relate to workshops that have been attended but
    not yet paid for. What I want to do with them next is to add the
    "WorkshopCost" field for each of the records that has an identical
    "SchoolName" and display the result, so that we have a subtotal for
    each school.
    I suspect this should probably be very easy but for some
    reason I can't figure out how it should be accomplished - if there
    is another posting where this is answered I would be very happy is
    someone would point it out! or otherwise give me a shove in the
    right direction.
    I'm thinking I need to do something with the array created by
    my query...?

    If I am understanding correctly, you would like to display a
    subtotal for each school. A simple option is to use the "group"
    attribute of cfquery. Then you could calculate the subtotal as you
    loop through the results and display it after each section. Another
    option is to use a QoQ.
    Keep in mind that when using "group", your sql query
    must order the results the same way. In other words, if you
    are grouping by "s_SchoolName" then your query must also ORDER BY
    s_SchoolName. Otherwise, the results will display incorrectly.

  • Are Apple products the only ones that have the option to have a hot spot built into i?

    my husband needs to use a tablet for work. We don't have an Internet provider for it. I thought about using a personal hot spot for it. I have 2 Apple products he doesn't have any. Can you use a personal hotspot for them. I am not familiar with his products at all. Is Apple the only one that offers a hotspot on their products?

    No. Click here and see the third paragraph.
    (120029)

  • Collect only columns that have values

    I have one Collection called Collection1 with the following columns:
    First
    Last
    Company
    I'd like to collect that information into another collection, but only the columns that have data in them.   I can do it using multiple If statements for each column If(IsEmpty()), but this can create a LOT of If statements if I'm using a lot of
    columns, rather than just the 3 in the example.
    Is there a way to evaluate each column, and only collect it if it isn't empty without having to type out each column name in an If statement?
    -Bruton

    Hello Oliver,
    Thanks for your help.  In that example, I would like:
    First          Last           Company
    John                            Contoso
                     Smith         Contoso2
    Brad          Anderson
    What I'm looking for how to do is if I have:
    First          Last          Company
    John          Smith         <empty>
    Bruton       Gaster        <empty>
    Barry         Manalo        <empty>
    I want to collect First and Last, but if I have:
    First          Last           Company
    Scott          <empty>   Acumen
    Bill             <empty>   Microsoft
    Fred           <empty>   Dell
    I want to collect First and Company.  The Column names may be based off variables, so I'd rather not have to throw a bunch of If statements at it, but if I have to, I have to.
    Thanks!
    -Bruton

  • Once more - tabular form / update only rows that have changed

    I know it's been asked before, but I haven't seen an answer I like. :-)
    I have a query that includes a single column the user can update, using APEX_ITEM.TEXT(10, updateable_field, 10, 10)
    I have an additional APEX_ITEM.HIDDEN(21) and APEX_ITEM.HIDDEN(22) that hold the two fields of the composite primary key. In order to track whether my updateable_field had changed, I created APEX_ITEM.HIDDEN(11, updateable_field), which I expected would hold the OLD value of the field. See where I'm going with this? :-)
    I'm attempting to loop through apex_application.g_f21, get the values for F10 (new) and F11 (old) and compare them. If they're different, I'll do the update.
    It works fine if the old value (F11) is empty and I plug in a new value (to F10).
    But if I change a field that had already has a value (in F11) and make it NULL, I notice that F11(i) doesn't exist. In that case, I set the value to NULL, and the compare fails because it thinks the row is unchanged.
    Can someone suggest or point me to an alternate method that works?
    Thanks as always,
    Stew

    Mike,
    Thanks for the suggestion, which is a good one. But I had that one covered.
    I have it working now, and I believe the fix was that I moved the APEX_ITEM.HIDDEN that contained the old value in the query. I'd had it concatenated with the column for the new value (which used APEX_ITEM.ITEM). I changed it to concatenate to a plain string value. And now the array has values in it, which I can properly compare.
    Thanks again. That was really driving me nuts!
    Stew

  • Totalling rows that have a 'sum' calculation in them

    I would like to report a single row for each 'cardcode' (I know there is only one at the moment) but as each row already has a 'sum' calculation in it I am not sure how to do this, any ideas please?
    The idea is to report only a total sales value per customer on one row for the given time period
    SELECT
    t1.cardcode as 'Code',
    t1.cardname as 'Name',
    t1.docnum as 'Document Number',
    sum(t0.price) as 'Sales Value'
    FROM
    rdr1 t0
    inner join ordr t1 on t0.docentry = t1.docentry
    WHERE
    t1.docdate >= '[%0]' and
    t1.docdate <= '[%1]' and
    t1.cardcode = 'ALL006'
    GROUP BY
    t1.cardcode,
    t1.cardname,
    t1.docnum
    Thanks,
    Robin

    Hi Robin,
    try this one. Instead of OINV you also can use ORDR:
    SELECT T1.[CardCode], T1.[CardName], SUM(T1.[DocTotal]-T1.[VatSum]) AS 'Sales Value'
    FROM [dbo].[OINV]  T1
    WHERE T1.[DocDate] BETWEEN [%1] AND [%2]
    GROUP BY T1.[CardCode], T1.[CardName]
    Of course, you will find a standard report in the Sales / Reports. There you can display sales value for customers on a given date range. Why do you want to create a query?
    Regards Steffen

  • How to use RichCopy to copy only files that have changed?

    I am using RichCopy to copy files and folders from one system to another on a weekly basis.  RichCopy is working fine, but it is copying 100% of the data every time.  I am looking for a way to use RichCopy where it will compare files/folders from
    the source and only copy what data has changed to the destination.  I cannot find the option to do that.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated...
    Thank you.

    RichCopy is not a Windows 7 feature and it is an obsolete utility and there is no support for RichCopy.
    Info found @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RichCopy
    RichCopy is not supported by Microsoft.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-technet200904_1-1">[1]</sup> The program has
    not been updated since approximately June 2009, despite numerous users requesting for bug fixes.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-4">[4]</sup>
    Duplicates functionality already in
    Robocopy
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. ”

  • Stuck on sql query to find parent records that have the same child records

    Oracle 10gR2 Enterprise Edition.
    Hi,
    I'm trying to write some logic to look for records in a parent table, which have the exact same values in a child table.
    This is part of a bigger query, but I'm stuck on this part for now, so I've mocked up some simplified tables below to capture the core of the
    problem I'm stuck on.
    Let say I've got a parent table Manager, a child table Employee and there's a many to many relationship between them.
    The aptly named Join_Table handles the relationship between them. So one manager can manage many employees, one employee can be managed by
    many managers.
    I've a feeling this is stupidly easy, but I seem to be suffering from a bad bout of brain freeze today!
    -- parent table
    CREATE TABLE manager (
    id      number primary key,
    name      varchar2(100));
    -- child table
    CREATE TABLE employee (
    id          number primary key,
    name      varchar2(100));
    -- link table
    CREATE TABLE join_table (
    manager_id          NUMBER,
    employee_id      NUMBER,
    CONSTRAINT join_table_pk PRIMARY KEY (manager_id, employee_id),
    CONSTRAINT manager_fk FOREIGN KEY (manager_id) REFERENCES manager(id),
    CONSTRAINT employee_fk FOREIGN KEY (employee_id) REFERENCES employee(id)
    -- Insert some managers
    INSERT INTO manager (id, name) VALUES (1, 'John');
    INSERT INTO manager (id, name) VALUES (2, 'Bob');
    INSERT INTO manager (id, name) VALUES (3, 'Mary');
    INSERT INTO manager (id, name) VALUES (4, 'Sue');
    INSERT INTO manager (id, name) VALUES (5, 'Alan');
    INSERT INTO manager (id, name) VALUES (6, 'Mike');
    -- Insert some employees
    INSERT INTO employee (id, name) VALUES (101, 'Paul');
    INSERT INTO employee (id, name) VALUES (102, 'Simon');
    INSERT INTO employee (id, name) VALUES (103, 'Ken');
    INSERT INTO employee (id, name) VALUES (104, 'Kevin');
    INSERT INTO employee (id, name) VALUES (105, 'Jack');
    INSERT INTO employee (id, name) VALUES (106, 'Jennifer');
    INSERT INTO employee (id, name) VALUES (107, 'Tim');
    -- Insert the links
    -- John manages Paul, Simon, Ken
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (1, 101);
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (1, 102);
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (1, 103);
    -- Bob manages Paul, Simon, Kevin, Jack
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (2, 101);
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (2, 102);
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (2, 104);
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (2, 105);
    -- Mary manages Jennifer, Tim
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (3, 106);
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (3, 107);
    -- Sue manages Jennifer, Tim
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (4, 106);
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (4, 107);
    -- Alan manages Paul, Simon, Ken, Jennifer, Tim
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (5, 101);
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (5, 102);
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (5, 103);
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (5, 106);
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (5, 107);
    -- Mike manages Paul, Simon, Ken
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (6, 101);
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (6, 102);
    INSERT INTO join_table (manager_id, employee_id) VALUES (6, 103);
    -- For sanity
    CREATE UNIQUE INDEX employee_name_uidx ON employee(name);So if I'm querying for manager John, I want to find the other managers who manage the exact same list of employees.
    Answer should be Mike.
    If I'm querying for manager Mary, answer should be Sue.
    This query will give me the list of managers who manage some of the same employees as John, but not the exact same employees...
    SELECT DISTINCT m.name AS manager
    FROM manager m, join_table jt, employee e
    WHERE m.id = jt.manager_id
    AND jt.employee_id = e.id
    AND e.id IN (
         SELECT e.id
         FROM manager m, join_table jt, employee e
         WHERE m.id = jt.manager_id
         AND jt.employee_id = e.id
         AND m.name = 'John')
    ORDER BY 1;I thought about using set operations to find managers whose list of employees minus my employees is null and where my employees minus their list of employees is null. But surely there's a simpler more elegant way.
    Any ideas?
    Btw, I need to run this as a batch job against tables with >20 million rows so query efficiency is key.

    What about...
    WITH manager_list AS
    SELECT name,
            LTRIM(MAX(SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(id,','))
            KEEP (DENSE_RANK LAST ORDER BY curr),',') AS employees
    FROM   (SELECT m.name,
                    e.id,
                    ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY m.name ORDER BY e.id) AS curr,
                    ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY m.name ORDER BY e.id) -1 AS prev
             FROM   manager m,
                    join_table jt,
                    employee e
      WHERE m.id           = jt.manager_id
      AND   jt.employee_id = e.id
      AND   m.name = :P_MANAGER)
      GROUP BY name
      CONNECT BY prev = PRIOR curr AND name = PRIOR name
      START WITH curr = 1
    ), all_list AS
    SELECT name,
            LTRIM(MAX(SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(id,','))
            KEEP (DENSE_RANK LAST ORDER BY curr),',') AS employees
    FROM   (SELECT m.name,
                    e.id,
                    ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY m.name ORDER BY e.id) AS curr,
                    ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY m.name ORDER BY e.id) -1 AS prev
             FROM   manager m,
                    join_table jt,
                    employee e
      WHERE m.id           = jt.manager_id
      AND   jt.employee_id = e.id)
      GROUP BY name
      CONNECT BY prev = PRIOR curr AND name = PRIOR name
      START WITH curr = 1
    SELECT a.*
    FROM   manager_list m,
           all_list a
    WHERE  m.employees = a.employeesWould be easier in 11g, but I don't have an installation here so this is based on 10g.
    Cheers
    Ben

  • Inserting records that have a timestamp

    I have a table with field1 as "timestamp with timezone". The bulk records I am trying to load have timestamp format = "YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS.FF". I altered the session nls_timestamp_format to "YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS.FF", but get 'bad month' when loading the tables. If I add the (to_timestamp(2005-02-25 14:12:22.003222)), I can load the record without an error. I don't want to add the 'to_timestamp to thousand of records. How can I alter the nls_timestamp_format and it allow me to insert all the records.
    Thanks in advance

    what according to you represents the current record?
    Please Mark This As Answer if it helps to solve the issue Visakh ---------------------------- http://visakhm.blogspot.com/ https://www.facebook.com/VmBlogs

  • Need help writing a MySQL query that will return only records with matching counter-parts

    Since I don't know how to explain this easily, I'm using the
    table below as an example.
    I want to create a MySQL query that will return only records
    that have matching counter-parts where 'col1' = 'ABC'.
    Notice the 'ABC / GHI' record does not have a
    counter-matching 'GHI / ABC' record. This record should not be
    returned because there is no matching counter-part. With this
    table, the 'ABC / GHI' record should be the only one returned in
    the query.
    How can I create a query that will do this?
    id | col1 | col2
    1 | ABC | DEF
    2 | DEF | ABC
    3 | ABC | GHI
    4 | DEF | GHI
    5 | GHI | DEF
    *Please let me know if you have no idea what I'm trying to
    explain.

    AngryCloud wrote:
    > Since I don't know how to explain this easily, I'm using
    the table below as an
    > example.
    >
    > I want to create a MySQL query that will return only
    records that have
    > matching counter-parts where 'col1' = 'ABC'.
    >
    > Notice the 'ABC / GHI' record does not have a
    counter-matching 'GHI / ABC'
    > record. This record should not be returned because there
    is no matching
    > counter-part. With this table, the 'ABC / GHI' record
    should be the only one
    > returned in the query.
    >
    > How can I create a query that will do this?
    >
    >
    > id | col1 | col2
    > --------------------
    > 1 | ABC | DEF
    > 2 | DEF | ABC
    > 3 | ABC | GHI
    > 4 | DEF | GHI
    > 5 | GHI | DEF
    >
    >
    > *Please let me know if you have no idea what I'm trying
    to explain.
    >
    Please be more clear. You say that 'ABC / GHI' should not be
    returned,
    and then you say that 'ABC / GHI' should be the only one
    returned. Can't
    have both...

  • Trying to find a record that does not have an event created for it

    Post Author: tzinser
    CA Forum: Formula
    A little background on how it works....
    We create a record, and everytime it is created, a number of "events" within that record are automatically created.  The specific event I am trying to run a report on is "REC".  I can run a report and get the information entered into the REC event no problem, but my problem is that if someone deletes the "REC" event it does not show up in my report.
    So my question is, what is the best way to write a function that displays all records that have the "REC" event, and all records that the "REC" event is missing.
    I'm using the generic funtion {EVENT.EventCode} = "REC"  right now....any suggestions?

    Post Author: tzinser
    CA Forum: Formula
    Okay, I left off a lot of important information...
    I'm using two tables
    TWDATA
    EVENT
    From TWDATA I'm pulling the fields TWDATA.OrderNumber and TWDATA.DisbursementDate
    From EVENT I'm pulling the fields EVENT.EventCode and EVENT.CompletedDate
    The two tables are linked by OrderNumber.

Maybe you are looking for

  • OPBHOBrokerDsktop.exe is causing serious performance problems on my new Windows 8.1 PC.

    Browsing websites with Process Monitor running,  there are millions of instances of this executable running in the background.  It apparently causes websites being browsed to go into a "not resplonding" state.  I use Webroot for security, and the com

  • How can i verified my apple id ?

    everytime i sign in my apple id in itune and app store i cant log in the reply is verified your apple id first...

  • Connecting SAP with an independent SQL database

    Dear all, I need to connect SAP with an independent MSSQL database. My requirement is to transfer a set of records from my Ztable to a table in SQL database. I have maintained the settings in DBCO transaction. I maintained DBMS as 'MSS' in DBCO. send

  • Setting up a pop 3 account

    I'm tearing my hair out here (not that theres that much left to tear out) I have Just switched over to apple from pc In apple mail i have setup a pop mail account its vodafone web mail but you can use it with a e mail client on my pc it was outlook e

  • Is there a Hold feature in Skype?

    We can allocate up to 10 numbers using Skype according to their FAQ's. If I will allocate 10 numbers to my skype account, will I have 10 skype ID's and passwords? Also, is there a hold button? For example, if someone called in on the 1st number, can