Installing SRSS 4.2 in a Solaris Zone ... why is it not supported

We would like to install SRSS 4.2 in a Solaris ... but the release notes says it is not supported. Any Ideas about that ?
http://wikis.sun.com/display/SRSS4dot2/Known+Issues
Nothing is installed in the global zone at OeNB anymore, so what can we expect here ?

SRS is not just an application.
SRS includes Kernel Drivers.
You must install the Kerneldrivers in the Kernel in the Global zone.
//Lars.

Similar Messages

I have a problem with installing PS13 as I get an error message "This installer does not support installation on a 64-Bit Windows operating system. Please download the 64-Bit version of Photoshop Elements." how do i do this?

i have a problem with installing PS13 as I get an error message "This installer does not support installation on a 64-Bit Windows operating system. Please download the 64-Bit version of Photoshop Elements." how do i do this

Try downloading the trial. It ought to detect that you have a 64-bit system.
You aren't using Vista, are you? PSE 13 requires at least win 7 and I think a few folks with vista have gotten a similar error message on trying to install it.

Since installing maverick, my c cleaner program says my operating system is not supported

Installed Maverick. My cleasning program says my operating system is not supported.

Hello,
The CCleaner Program form Priform does not support OSX Mavericks.
I personally feel that you do not need a 3RD party cleaning software on your apple computer, due to the fact that the computer performs these tasks automatically.
here are some links to other Apple Discussions of the same topic:
https://discussions.apple.com/message/22934635#22934635
Thanks,
Matt

Error 7 (windows error 126). Have tried to re-install itunes but failed, twice. some end message about "mobile device not supported".

Error 7 (Windows error 126). I have tried to re-install itunes twice now, and each time " mobile device not supported" appears and the installation can not finish.

See Troubleshooting issues with iTunes for Windows updates.
Do you have any iOS devices? If the link above doesn't completely fix your library I could talk you through installing iTunes without Apple Moble Device Support for now which would at least enable you to open iTunes.
tt2

Why does Silverlight install process state that my 64-bit Win Vista OS does NOT support the 64-bit version of Silverlight?

As of Monday 4/20, I've encountered a significant problem with Silverlight on my Vista PC.
Several weeks ago I read a brief item stating that Google would be dropping support for npapi and that it would affect Silverlight sometime in April. One of my key daily apps uses Silverlight, but I didn't receive notification from that software's author
about the pending change and how it would be handled. Successfully used the app every week (Mon-Fri) this month for 8-10 hrs/dy day (as I've been doing for the past ~5+ years: past year under Chrome, year before that under FireFox, ~3 prior years
under IE) and on Fri 4/17 shut it down for the weekend. When I booted up on Mon morning and tried to log into the key app however, it prompted me to download and install Silverlight, acting as though I never had it installed!
I recalled the earlier warning about Google dropping support, so I closed Chrome, started up FireFox, but got the same prompt from the app -- it directed me to install Silverlight. I downloaded it (had no choice as to which version, just got the "Silverlight_x64.exe"
file) and got part-way through the install when this error msg popped up: "Unable to Install Silverlight. Your operating system does not support the 64-bit version of Silverlight". WHAT?! Clicking on the "more info"
link led to this msg: "Message ID: 1518. Your operating system does not support the 64-bit version of Silverlight. Click here for the latest version of Silverlight." That link simply led back to the download page which resulted
in receiving another copy of the same executable file.
According to my system ( > Control Panel > System ), I'm running "Windows Vista Home Premium", with a "System Type: 64-bit Operating System". I've been using this same Vista PC since Sep 2008 and running Silverlight for
around the past 5 yrs.
? -- Why doe the Silverlight installer code flag my OS as not supported?
? -- Is there a way to get an older version of Silverlight that will run under Vista?
Thanks in advance for any helpful comments.

Andy -- Thanks for the link, but I'm not adventurous enough to download from a non-MSFT site.
Besides, since I didn't make any changes to my hardware/software config, I expect a MSFT rep to explain why their two programs suddenly stopped working together and then provide whatever code fix is needed. A phone call to their tech support (predictably)
led to nowhere but a recommendation to purchase one of the company's support offerings (which I declined to pursue). The Silverlight development team appears to participate in these forums, so I'd hope one or more of them offers a realistic solution.
Here's something I forgot to mention in my original post: In several of the threads on this subject (some dating back to 2008!), people have
suggested running IE as the browser vs FireFox or Chrome; however, that idea fails to note that the error msg (Message ID:1518) clearly states that "your operating
system does not support the 64-bit version of Silverlight"; it doesn't say anything about
what browser you're using.

INSTALL PROBLEM 2 NODES RAC ON SOLARIS ZONES SINGLE HOST

Hi,
Does anybody tried to install rac using two zones located on the same physical machines as rac nodes?
I got problem after installation when it adds deamons to inittab and tries to start crs stack.
Even the css didn't come up.
It seems that voting disk where formatted correctly
alerttest-zone.log:
[client(20136)]CRS-1006:The OCR location /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s0 is inaccessible. Details in /app/oracle/product/10.2.0/crs_1/log/test-zone/client/ocrconfig_20136.log.
2009-11-19 10:41:14.587
[client(20136)]CRS-1006:The OCR location /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s0 is inaccessible. Details in /app/oracle/product/10.2.0/crs_1/log/test-zone/client/ocrconfig_20136.log.
2009-11-19 10:41:14.636
[client(20136)]CRS-1006:The OCR location /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s0 is inaccessible. Details in /app/oracle/product/10.2.0/crs_1/log/test-zone/client/ocrconfig_20136.log.
2009-11-19 10:41:14.936
[client(20136)]CRS-1001:The OCR was formatted using version 2.
2009-11-19 10:44:22.023
[client(20190)]CRS-1801:Cluster crs configured with nodes test-zone test-zone2 .
OCR config also created correctly :
ocrconfig_20136.log:
2009-11-19 10:41:14.685: [ OCROSD][1]utsz:3: ioctl DKIOCGAPART failed. errno [48]
2009-11-19 10:41:14.686: [ OCRRAW][1]propriogid:1: INVALID FORMAT
2009-11-19 10:41:14.785: [ OCRRAW][1]propriowv: Vote information on disk 0 [dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s0] is adjusted from [0/0] to [2/2]
2009-11-19 10:41:14.936: [ OCRRAW][1]propriniconfig:No 92 configuration
2009-11-19 10:41:14.936: [ OCRAPI][1]a_init:6a: Backend init successful
2009-11-19 10:41:15.709: [ OCRCONF][1]Initialized DATABASE keys in OCR
2009-11-19 10:41:16.019: [ OCRCONF][1]Successfully set skgfr block 0
2009-11-19 10:41:16.022: [ OCRCONF][1]Exiting [status=success]...
But it just can't run starting from css services:
css.log:
2009-11-19 10:54:39.297: [ OCROSD][1]utsz:3: ioctl DKIOCGAPART failed. errno [48]
2009-11-19 10:54:39.337: [ CSSCLNT][1]clsssInitNative: connect failed, rc 9
2009-11-19 10:54:40.401: [ OCROSD][1]utsz:3: ioctl DKIOCGAPART failed. errno [48]
2009-11-19 10:54:40.440: [ CSSCLNT][1]clsssInitNative: connect failed, rc 9
Does anyone has any idea???
Best Regards
Radek

I don't have an answer for you, but I do have a warning. Do not stop any RAC processes. All RAC processes are essential to the successful operation of RAC. If you stop one of these processes then it is likely that either the instance on that node will fail and crash, or communication with the other node will be lost for a period of time. If this were to happen that the other node which was still running and unchanged would assume the other node had failed and perform a failover operation, recovering inflight transactions in the redo logs of the other instance.
All of this takes time, will impact performance, and will possibly kill off half of your sessions that were on the node you made the changes to. Recovery from one node to another takes time, and will mean that the remaining node will force the other node to shutdown, one way or another. It will use some of the underlying Clusterware capabilities to achieve this.
So, please do not just stop a RAC process, just because you want to backup some files in a file system. Do not touch the RAC processes at all. They are only meant to be controlled through RAC specific commands and tools such as Enterprise Manager.
John

I pressed for an app to update. It said "installing" and has said so ever since. Why does it not complete?

I pressed for an app to be updated. The message came: installing. It failed to upload and said it had failed to do so but it continues to say it is installing. There is a constant reminder to instal the update but no way is indicated for me to start again or even give up.

Try a reset:
Hold the Sleep and Home button down until you see the Apple logo.

Zfs core dumps in Solaris Zones after patchcluster installation

Hi
I've installed the recommended patch cluster for Solaris 10 (SPARC) on my T2000 Server.
Now after the reboot all the Solaris Zones (got about 10 of them) instantly do zfs core dumps when their booted.
Some Output:
Dec 15 15:34:43 XXXXX genunix: NOTICE: core_log: zfs[1711] core dumped: /var/core/core_XXXXXX_zfs_0_0_1292423682_1711
bash-3.00# svcs
STATE STIME FMRI
online 13:58:50 svc:/system/svc/restarter:default
online 13:58:51 svc:/system/filesystem/root:default
online 13:58:51 svc:/network/loopback:default
online 13:58:53 svc:/network/pfil:default
online 13:58:54 svc:/system/installupdates:default
online 13:58:55 svc:/system/boot-archive:default
online 13:58:56 svc:/network/physical:default
online 13:58:57 svc:/system/filesystem/usr:default
online 13:58:57 svc:/system/identity:node
online 13:58:58 svc:/system/device/local:default
online 13:58:58 svc:/system/keymap:default
online 13:58:58 svc:/milestone/devices:default
online 13:58:58 svc:/system/filesystem/minimal:default
online 13:58:58 svc:/system/rmtmpfiles:default
online 13:58:58 svc:/system/cryptosvc:default
online 13:58:59 svc:/system/identity:domain
online 13:58:59 svc:/system/name-service-cache:default
online 13:58:59 svc:/system/coreadm:default
online 13:58:59 svc:/network/ipsec/ipsecalgs:default
online 13:58:59 svc:/application/print/ppd-cache-update:default
online 13:58:59 svc:/network/ipsec/policy:default
online 13:59:00 svc:/milestone/network:default
online 13:59:00 svc:/network/initial:default
online 13:59:00 svc:/system/manifest-import:default
online 13:59:00 svc:/network/service:default
online 13:59:00 svc:/milestone/single-user:default
online 13:59:00 svc:/network/dns/client:default
online 13:59:00 svc:/network/routing-setup:default
online 13:59:00 svc:/milestone/name-services:default
online 13:59:03 svc:/milestone/sysconfig:default
online 13:59:03 svc:/system/utmp:default
online 13:59:03 svc:/system/console-login:default
offline 13:58:51 svc:/system/sysidtool:net
offline 13:58:51 svc:/network/rpc/bind:default
offline 13:58:51 svc:/system/sysidtool:system
offline 13:58:52 svc:/network/nfs/status:default
offline 13:58:52 svc:/network/nfs/nlockmgr:default
offline 13:58:52 svc:/network/nfs/cbd:default
offline 13:58:52 svc:/network/nfs/mapid:default
offline 13:58:52 svc:/network/inetd:default
offline 13:58:52 svc:/network/nfs/client:default
offline 13:58:52 svc:/system/filesystem/autofs:default
offline 13:58:53 svc:/system/system-log:default
offline 13:58:53 svc:/network/smtp:sendmail
offline 13:58:53 svc:/system/cron:default
offline 13:58:53 svc:/milestone/multi-user:default
offline 13:58:54 svc:/application/management/snmpdx:default
offline 13:58:54 svc:/application/management/dmi:default
offline 13:58:54 svc:/application/management/seaport:default
offline 13:58:54 svc:/network/ssh:default
offline 13:58:54 svc:/milestone/multi-user-server:default
offline 13:58:54 svc:/application/font/fc-cache:default
offline 13:58:55 svc:/application/management/sma:default
offline 13:58:58 svc:/system/sac:default
offline 13:59:00 svc:/network/shares/group:default
offline 13:59:00 svc:/system/boot-archive-update:default
maintenance 15:34:43 svc:/system/filesystem/local:default
uninitialized 13:58:52 svc:/network/rpc/gss:default
uninitialized 13:58:54 svc:/application/font/stfsloader:default
uninitialized 13:58:55 svc:/network/rpc/rstat:default
uninitialized 13:58:55 svc:/application/print/rfc1179:default
uninitialized 13:58:55 svc:/application/x11/xfs:default
uninitialized 13:58:55 svc:/network/finger:default
uninitialized 13:58:55 svc:/network/ftp:default
uninitialized 13:58:56 svc:/network/login:rlogin
uninitialized 13:58:56 svc:/network/nfs/rquota:default
uninitialized 13:58:56 svc:/network/rpc/rusers:default
uninitialized 13:58:56 svc:/network/rpc/smserver:default
uninitialized 13:58:57 svc:/network/security/ktkt_warn:default
uninitialized 13:58:57 svc:/network/shell:default
uninitialized 13:58:57 svc:/network/telnet:default
uninitialized 13:58:58 svc:/network/rpc-100235_1/rpc_ticotsord:default
uninitialized 13:58:58 svc:/network/rpc/cde-calendar-manager:default
uninitialized 13:58:59 svc:/network/rpc/cde-ttdbserver:tcp
bash-3.00# svcs -x
svc:/system/filesystem/local:default (local file system mounts)
State: maintenance since Wed Dec 15 15:34:43 2010
Reason: Start method exited with $SMF_EXIT_ERR_FATAL.
See: http://sun.com/msg/SMF-8000-KS
See: /var/svc/log/system-filesystem-local:default.log
Impact: 24 dependent services are not running. (Use -v for list.)
svc:/network/rpc/gss:default (Generic Security Service)
State: uninitialized since Wed Dec 15 13:58:52 2010
Reason: Restarter svc:/network/inetd:default is not running.
See: http://sun.com/msg/SMF-8000-5H
See: gssd(1M)
Impact: 11 dependent services are not running. (Use -v for list.)
svc:/network/rpc/rstat:default (kernel statistics server)
State: uninitialized since Wed Dec 15 13:58:55 2010
Reason: Restarter svc:/network/inetd:default is not running.
See: http://sun.com/msg/SMF-8000-5H
See: rpc.rstatd(1M)
See: rstatd(1M)
Impact: 1 dependent service is not running. (Use -v for list.)
bash-3.00# cat /var/svc/log/system-filesystem-local:default.log
[ Jul 10 03:41:35 Enabled. ]
[ Jul 10 03:43:45 Rereading configuration. ]
[ Jul 10 03:44:17 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Jul 10 03:44:18 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Jul 10 12:44:36 Enabled. ]
[ Jul 10 12:44:45 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Jul 10 12:44:45 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Jul 10 12:45:03 Enabled. ]
[ Jul 10 12:45:09 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Jul 10 12:45:09 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Jul 10 13:54:39 Enabled. ]
[ Jul 10 13:54:46 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Jul 10 13:54:46 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Jul 18 12:34:19 Enabled. ]
[ Jul 18 12:34:27 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Jul 18 12:34:27 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Jul 18 17:29:08 Enabled. ]
[ Jul 18 17:29:15 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Jul 18 17:29:15 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Jul 19 11:13:34 Enabled. ]
[ Jul 19 11:13:42 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Jul 19 11:13:42 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Jul 19 11:32:23 Enabled. ]
[ Jul 19 11:32:30 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Jul 19 11:32:31 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Jul 19 11:57:06 Enabled. ]
[ Jul 19 11:57:13 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Jul 19 11:57:13 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Jul 19 12:40:05 Enabled. ]
[ Jul 19 12:40:12 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Jul 19 12:40:12 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Jul 20 15:51:46 Enabled. ]
[ Jul 20 15:51:54 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Jul 20 15:51:54 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Jul 24 11:42:17 Enabled. ]
[ Jul 24 11:42:25 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Jul 24 11:42:25 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Jul 27 12:05:06 Stopping because service disabled. ]
[ Jul 27 12:05:07 Executing stop method (null) ]
[ Jul 27 12:13:10 Enabled. ]
[ Jul 27 12:13:17 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Jul 27 12:13:17 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Jul 27 13:10:26 Stopping because service disabled. ]
[ Jul 27 13:10:26 Executing stop method (null) ]
[ Jul 27 13:18:19 Enabled. ]
[ Jul 27 13:18:26 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Jul 27 13:18:26 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Jul 31 10:12:31 Enabled. ]
[ Jul 31 10:12:38 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Jul 31 10:12:39 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 7 10:08:52 Stopping because service disabled. ]
[ Aug 7 10:08:52 Executing stop method (null) ]
[ Aug 7 10:34:50 Enabled. ]
[ Aug 7 10:34:57 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Aug 7 10:34:58 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 9 09:14:50 Stopping because service disabled. ]
[ Aug 9 09:14:50 Executing stop method (null) ]
[ Aug 9 09:55:03 Enabled. ]
[ Aug 9 09:55:10 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Aug 9 09:55:11 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 16 10:46:43 Enabled. ]
[ Aug 16 10:46:50 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Aug 16 10:46:50 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 16 12:06:56 Enabled. ]
[ Aug 16 12:07:02 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Aug 16 12:07:02 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 16 13:45:10 Enabled. ]
[ Aug 16 13:45:16 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Aug 16 13:45:16 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 16 14:36:59 Enabled. ]
[ Aug 16 14:37:07 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Aug 16 14:37:07 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 16 15:00:40 Enabled. ]
[ Aug 16 15:00:47 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Aug 16 15:00:47 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 22 16:00:13 Enabled. ]
[ Aug 22 16:00:21 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Aug 22 16:00:21 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 23 09:49:04 Enabled. ]
[ Aug 23 09:49:10 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Aug 23 09:49:11 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 23 09:49:23 Stopping because service disabled. ]
[ Aug 23 09:49:23 Executing stop method (null) ]
[ Aug 23 10:04:13 Enabled. ]
[ Aug 23 10:04:20 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Aug 23 10:04:20 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 23 10:06:57 Enabled. ]
[ Aug 23 10:07:04 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Aug 23 10:07:05 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Oct 23 08:43:05 Enabled. ]
[ Oct 23 08:43:14 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Oct 23 08:43:14 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Nov 21 14:51:50 Enabled. ]
[ Nov 21 14:51:58 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Nov 21 14:51:59 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Nov 29 15:33:19 Enabled. ]
[ Nov 29 15:33:26 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Nov 29 15:33:27 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Dec 18 13:37:35 Enabled. ]
[ Dec 18 13:37:42 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Dec 18 13:37:42 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Dec 19 08:48:07 Enabled. ]
[ Dec 19 08:48:14 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Dec 19 08:48:14 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Dec 19 08:56:07 Enabled. ]
[ Dec 19 08:56:14 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Dec 19 08:56:14 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Dec 19 08:57:41 Enabled. ]
[ Dec 19 08:57:48 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Dec 19 08:57:48 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Feb 1 10:39:48 Enabled. ]
[ Feb 1 10:39:55 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Feb 1 10:39:56 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Feb 8 11:12:50 Enabled. ]
[ Feb 8 11:12:57 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Feb 8 11:12:57 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Jun 6 10:08:34 Enabled. ]
[ Jun 6 10:08:44 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Jun 6 10:08:46 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 8 09:45:48 Enabled. ]
[ Aug 8 09:46:35 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Aug 8 09:46:36 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 14 17:53:59 Enabled. ]
[ Aug 14 17:54:06 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Aug 14 17:54:06 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 14 17:55:20 Enabled. ]
[ Aug 14 17:55:27 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Aug 14 17:55:27 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 18 15:19:17 Enabled. ]
[ Aug 18 15:19:24 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Aug 18 15:19:24 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 29 12:56:48 Enabled. ]
[ Aug 29 12:56:55 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Aug 29 12:56:55 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Oct 13 11:59:43 Enabled. ]
[ Oct 13 11:59:50 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Oct 13 11:59:51 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Feb 26 16:47:00 Enabled. ]
[ Feb 26 16:47:07 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Feb 26 16:47:07 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Apr 14 15:54:17 Enabled. ]
[ Apr 14 15:54:24 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Apr 14 15:54:25 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 28 08:49:58 Stopping because service disabled. ]
[ Aug 28 08:49:58 Executing stop method (null) ]
[ Aug 28 08:52:54 Enabled. ]
[ Aug 28 08:53:01 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
bootadm: this operation is not supported on sparc
[ Aug 28 08:53:01 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Aug 28 09:08:20 Stopping because service disabled. ]
[ Aug 28 09:08:20 Executing stop method (null) ]
[ Sep 1 16:05:36 Enabled. ]
[ Sep 1 16:06:05 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
[ Sep 1 16:06:05 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Sep 1 19:29:19 Enabled. ]
[ Sep 1 19:29:27 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
[ Sep 1 19:29:27 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Sep 1 23:04:00 Enabled. ]
[ Sep 1 23:04:08 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
[ Sep 1 23:04:08 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Sep 2 00:23:41 Stopping because service disabled. ]
[ Sep 2 00:23:42 Executing stop method (null) ]
[ Sep 2 00:46:46 Enabled. ]
[ Sep 2 00:46:53 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
[ Sep 2 00:46:54 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Sep 26 12:04:34 Enabled. ]
[ Sep 26 12:04:41 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
[ Sep 26 12:04:42 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Oct 20 13:05:09 Stopping because service disabled. ]
[ Oct 20 13:05:10 Executing stop method (null) ]
[ Oct 20 13:24:01 Enabled. ]
[ Oct 20 13:24:08 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
[ Oct 20 13:24:09 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Oct 21 16:30:59 Enabled. ]
[ Oct 21 16:31:09 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
[ Oct 21 16:31:09 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Oct 21 16:32:42 Stopping because service disabled. ]
[ Oct 21 16:32:42 Executing stop method (null) ]
[ Oct 21 16:42:05 Enabled. ]
[ Oct 21 16:42:15 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
[ Oct 21 16:42:15 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Oct 21 17:27:37 Enabled. ]
[ Oct 21 17:27:47 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
[ Oct 21 17:27:47 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Oct 22 11:08:34 Enabled. ]
[ Oct 22 11:08:43 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
[ Oct 22 11:08:43 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Dec 9 09:17:33 Stopping because service disabled. ]
[ Dec 9 09:17:33 Executing stop method (null) ]
[ Dec 10 11:47:14 Enabled. ]
[ Dec 10 11:47:24 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
[ Dec 10 11:47:25 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
[ Dec 15 10:52:25 Stopping because service disabled. ]
[ Dec 15 10:52:25 Executing stop method (null) ]
[ Dec 15 12:42:16 Enabled. ]
[ Dec 15 12:42:26 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
Abort - core dumped
WARNING: /usr/sbin/zfs mount -a failed: exit status 134
[ Dec 15 12:42:28 Method "start" exited with status 95 ]
[ Dec 15 13:13:19 Enabled. ]
[ Dec 15 13:13:28 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
Abort - core dumped
WARNING: /usr/sbin/zfs mount -a failed: exit status 134
[ Dec 15 13:13:30 Method "start" exited with status 95 ]
[ Dec 15 13:58:51 Enabled. ]
[ Dec 15 13:59:00 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
Abort - core dumped
WARNING: /usr/sbin/zfs mount -a failed: exit status 134
[ Dec 15 13:59:03 Method "start" exited with status 95 ]
[ Dec 15 15:34:41 Leaving maintenance because clear requested. ]
[ Dec 15 15:34:41 Enabled. ]
[ Dec 15 15:34:41 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/fs-local") ]
Abort - core dumped
WARNING: /usr/sbin/zfs mount -a failed: exit status 134
[ Dec 15 15:34:43 Method "start" exited with status 95 ]
bash-3.00# /usr/sbin/zfs mount -a
internal error: Unknown error
Abort (core dumped)
Before that I've installed the patch cluster with halted solaris zones which produced following output:
Application of patches finished : 2010.12.15 12:08:43
Following patches were applied :
119254-77 119812-10 125719-31 140159-03 142911-01
141588-04 119900-11 125731-05 142292-01 142933-02
142251-02 119906-16 126206-05 141444-09 142909-17
118666-28 120460-17 126363-08 141500-07 143140-04
118667-28 121012-03 126365-16 141502-02 143502-01
118777-16 121308-20 126868-04 141506-09 143506-01
140860-02 122212-40 127724-02 141514-02 143615-02
119059-56 122261-03 136998-09 141518-12 143731-01
119213-23 122675-05 137000-07 141552-03 143733-01
124628-10 123003-04 137080-05 141558-01 143977-01
119252-29 123590-12 137147-06 141586-01 144053-04
119280-23 123893-22 138195-04 141590-02 144106-01
124188-03 124393-11 138822-07 141874-09 144254-01
120199-15 124457-02 138826-07 141876-07 144488-04
119534-19 124630-42 138880-02 142084-04 144492-01
120272-28 125215-03 139099-04 142397-01 145124-01
119757-18 125388-03 139620-01 142529-01 145796-01
119783-15 125555-07
Following patches were skipped :
Patches already applied
120900-04 119063-01 119810-05 123005-07 137093-01
121133-02 119081-25 119986-03 124444-01 138866-03
119317-01 119130-33 120061-02 124939-03 137137-09
121296-01 123611-04 120201-05 124943-01 137871-02
138215-01 140899-01 120292-02 124997-01 138181-01
127884-01 122640-05 120329-02 125279-05 138361-01
118712-23 126897-02 121975-01 125539-06 138373-02
118918-24 127755-01 120719-02 125891-01 138647-01
138217-01 125503-02 120830-06 126440-01 141016-01
119578-30 125547-02 121095-02 126540-02 139555-08
121453-02 140796-01 121606-04 127127-11 139967-01
121453-02 120011-14 124171-07 136882-02 140455-01
121118-16 139520-02 123630-03 137032-01 140563-01
118833-36 119764-06
Patches obsoleted by one or more patches already applied
118731-01 124204-04 122660-10
Patches not applicable to packages on the system
121181-03 120410-33 121211-02 125533-15 143317-03
119115-35 120412-11 122259-03 125541-06 143510-01
119117-52 120414-27 122470-03 125952-20 143725-01
119315-19 120543-21 122911-24 137004-08 143727-01
119548-14 120739-06 122958-06 138387-01 143739-01
119903-02 120811-09 123938-02 138824-07 144325-01
120094-30 120849-04 125136-24 138876-01 145006-02
120185-21 121104-11 125137-24 139986-01 145080-01
119368-04 121136-02 125332-14 142244-02 145200-01
120286-03
Installation of patch set complete. PLEASE REBOOT THE SYSTEM.
when i tried to reboot the system by init 6 the service iscsi hanged and produced syslog errors about a unkown iocall -> killed the process. System rebooted w/o errors.
Does anyone have got an idea how to find out which patch or whatever do produce these errors?

Hi,
I'm having the same issue of diskmon core dumps after upgrading grid and database from 11.2.0.1 to 11.2.0.2 on Solaris 10 x86-64. Following this thread, I'm trying to deinstall the Oracle 11.2.0.1 grid home.
I answered the following questions asked by the grid deinstall tool:
1. ASM configuration was not detected in this Oracle home. Was ASM configured in this Oracle home (y|n): y
2. Specify the ASM Diagnostic Destination: /db01/app/oracle/diag/asm/+ASM
3. Specify the diskgroups that are managed by this ASM instance: DATA FRA
4. De-configuring ASM will drop all the diskgroups at cleanup time. Do you want deconfig tool to drop the diskgroups:
If I answer no to question 1, the tool exits with error.
How do I answer question #4? (confused about this question of dropping diskgroups, it's already been upgraded)
Deinstall of Oracle db Home 11.2.0.1 was successful.
The +ASM instance has been upgraded and is running fine under 11.2.0.2 except for the excessive diskmon core dumps.
Thanks,
Lisa
Edited by: user12018917 on Apr 19, 2011 10:21 AM

Clusterware to control solaris zones/containers

Hi,
Does anyone uses crs to control solaris zones/containers?
Is it supported, what are the implementations you have? Do you have the zones installed on a acfs filesystem, ufs or zfs?
How does the crs control them? Scripts?
Regards

Hi,
what exactly do you mean by crs? I only know this term in conjunction with the Oracle Clusterware, which comes with the Grid Infrastructure.
In general there is no build in function from Oracle Clusterware/Grid Infrastructure to control Solaris Zones/Containers, especially if you install the Oracle Grid Infrastructure in the local zone, then you do not have any control for the zone itself. Even if you install GI in the global zone, there are no build in control functions. You would have to write something yourself, but in this case I would use Solaris Clusterware.
So if you need a clusterware to control the zones, I would take Oracle Solaris Clusterware. (Note the difference, this is not the Grid Infrastructure, but the original SUN clusterware).
This also answers your other questions. Solaris Zones cannot be build on ACFS, since ACFS comes with the GI.
So normally zones will be build on ZFS. Solaris Cluster also has build in functionaly to control the zones.
Regards
Sebastian

SP1 to R2 Upgrade - The installed Version of SQL Server is not supported for the operational database

Hello,
Am trying to upgrade a SCOM SP1 environment to SCOM R2( 3 MGT servers, 1 GW and 2 Web console boxes )
The prerequisites are failing and it is stating the following ;
Operational Database SQL Version Check - The installed Version of SQL Server is not supported for the operational database
Data Warehouse SQL Version Check - The installed Version of SQL Server is not supported for the data warehouse
The SQL servers are running SQL 2012 SP1 64 Enterprise, which is compatible.
All other pre-upgrade tasks have been done.
Help appreciated!

I'm having the exact same issue, I believe. I think that Tubble has problem with SCOM 2012. Not 2007.
I've checked the compatibility list for both SCOM 2012 SP1 and R2. All newer Windows Server and SQL versions are supported. We're running the SQL 2012 SP1 x64 Standard edition on a Windows Server 2012 Standard.
I even tried to move the database from SQL 2012 to an older SQL 2008 R2, but that's not supported either. Only upgrading. Not downgrading.
So, I started checking the opsMgrSetupWizard.log file for clues. And the error message was there as well. But the reason why it says not supported is that it can't get the info about the OS version, so I guess it assumes the OS version is to low. The RPC
service can not be reached.
[10:29:11]: Error: :GetRemoteOSVersion(): Threw Exception.Type: System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException, Exception Error Code: 0x800706BA, Exception.Message: The RPC server is unavailable. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x800706BA)
[10:29:11]: Error: :StackTrace: at System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ThrowExceptionForHRInternal(Int32 errorCode, IntPtr errorInfo)
at System.Management.ManagementScope.InitializeGuts(Object o)
at System.Management.ManagementScope.Initialize()
at System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher.Initialize()
at System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher.Get()
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.OperationsManager.Setup.Common.SetupValidationHelpers.GetRemoteOSVersion(String remoteComputer)
[10:29:11]: Debug: :IsSQLOnAValidComputer: remote OS version string was null or empty.
[10:29:11]: Error: :Error:IsValidSQLVersionCheck: SqlServer OS version is too low.
[10:29:11]: Debug: :**************************************************
[10:29:11]: Error: :<![CDATA[CheckPrerequisites: Logic Type:and IsValidOMDBSQLVersionCheck: 2]]>
[10:29:11]: Error: :
[10:29:11]: Error: :CheckPrerequisites: OMDBSqlVersionCheckTitle: Failed
[10:29:11]: Error: :
[10:29:11]: Debug: :**************************************************
[10:29:33]: Error: :GetRemoteOSVersion(): Threw Exception.Type: System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException, Exception Error Code: 0x800706BA, Exception.Message: The RPC server is unavailable. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x800706BA)
[10:29:33]: Error: :StackTrace: at System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ThrowExceptionForHRInternal(Int32 errorCode, IntPtr errorInfo)
at System.Management.ManagementScope.InitializeGuts(Object o)
at System.Management.ManagementScope.Initialize()
at System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher.Initialize()
at System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher.Get()
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.OperationsManager.Setup.Common.SetupValidationHelpers.GetRemoteOSVersion(String remoteComputer)
[10:29:33]: Debug: :IsSQLOnAValidComputer: remote OS version string was null or empty.
[10:29:33]: Error: :Error:IsValidSQLVersionCheck: SqlServer OS version is too low.
[10:29:33]: Debug: :**************************************************
So, in our case this was just a FW that was blocking some high ports between management server and SQL. I believe TCP port 135 also needs to be open.
Let's hope this fixes your issue as well, Tubble.
Have a great day!

Can EM12c Cloud Control agent be installed in a solaris zone?

Can EM12c Cloud Control agent be installed in a solaris zone?
If so, are Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 zones supported?
thanks

Yes we can...
Solaris 9 is supported...I have installed agents on solaris 9 and 10

After installing 137137-09 patch OK in global zone, bad in non global zone

Hi all,
scratching my head with this one.
Installed 137137-09 fine on Sun Fire V210. Machine has one non global zone running a proxy server (nothing very exciting there!). non global zone has a local filesystem attached, but don't think this is the issue (on my test V210 I created the same sort of filesystem and was unable to replicate the problem :( ).
So 137137-09 is fine in the global zone (I had the non global zone halted when patch installed) it is also installed in the non global zone (ie, when zone boots it says it's at rev 137137-09 via uname) in the patch log in the non global zone I get this:
PKG=SUNWust2.v
Original package not installed.
pkgadd: ERROR: ERROR: unable to get zone brand: zonecfg_get_brand: No such zone configured
This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
version of a package which is already installed. This installation
will attempt to overwrite this package.
/usr/local/zones/cotchin/lu/dev/.SUNW_patches_1000109009-1847556-000000d3e42faa84/137137-09/FJSVcpcu/install/checkinstall: /usr/local/zones/cotchin/lu/dev/.SUNW_patches_1000109009-1847556-000000d3e42faa84/137137-09/FJSVcpcu/install/checkinstall: cannot open
pkgadd: ERROR: checkinstall script did not complete successfully
Dryrun complete.
No changes were made to the system.
I'm not sure if the branding error is causing the checkinstall postpatch script error or if they are not related. There doesn't seem to be any obvious permissions problems that I can find. I have checked that all the pkg and patch patches are up to date on the system. Searching on the brand error gives me a link to a problem with 127127-11, but that was installed on the system before the local zone was created and all the other seemingly appropriate patches (eg: 119254) are all up to date or at a higher revision than recommended.
I see the same problem on a M5000 which has two non global zones on it.
Both machines had the Solaris 10 50/08 update bundle applied when it came out,a nd have had recommended patch sets applied at regular intervals since.
This issue only came to light when trying the latest bundles with 138888-01/02 in it, and those fail to install on the global zones because the non global zone install dies claiming 137137-09 is not installed (which is plainly wrong).
I've tried to recreate this on a test server but unfortunately everything works as it should, even though the test server has a similar history in terms of patches and original setup to the others.
I'm planning to try to detatch the non global zone and try an attach -u to see if it will update the patches properly, but I'm not holding out much hope on that one (I need to wait for a mainteiance window when I can take the zone down in a couple of days).
Any ideas?

Well, I am following up to my own post it seems I have determined what is causing the problem, or at least situations where the problem can be reproduced which I have been able to do on my test system.
It seems that if the zone container's zonepath is in /usr (eg: /usr/zones, /usr/local/zones, or some other path under /usr) the patchadd of 137137-09 will fail with the log similar to posted above, and this will stop further kernel patches (eg: 138888-02) being added.
The test system had everything patched to current and searching the web I can't find any other instances of this being an issue, but I have reproduced this problem on my test machine (which worked OK because it's test zones were in a filesystem mounted as /zones). When I used zoneadd -z <zonename> move to a zone in /usr/local and applied 137137-09 the same problem came up.
Not sure what is causing this issue.. I imagine it might have to do with some sort of confusion with the patch utilities and the read-only loopback filesystems in the sparse root zone but I can't bs sure.
Maybe someone at sun will see this and figure out what the deal is :)
When I moved my test zone back to /zones the patch applied perfectly so it's definitely having it in /usr or /usr/local (I tried both locations, even though they are seperate ufs filesystems on my test server).
Oh I am running DiskSuite to mirror filesystems on my V210's which may or may not have anything to do with it.
Hope this helps someone in the future at least!

SAP Java and Solaris Zones SolMan 4.0

May require Solaris Zones experience to continue.
I have three SAP database instances/central instances running in three sparse Solaris zones with no problem.
I have created a new sparse zone for a new SAP installation (Solution Manager 4.0) and started the installation. SAP requires a 1.4.2 SDK even though Java 1.5 comes with Solaris 10. The 1.4.2 SDK is in /usr/j2se. The installation in the sparse zone errors out because it can't get "write" rights to /usr/j2se/jre/lib/security/local_policy.jar as it is trying to install some security encryption JCE component.
I have thought about creating a /usr/j2se_zonename file system, copying the contents of /usr/j2se into it and then mounting /usr/j2se_zonename in the zone as a lofs with the name /usr/j2se. However when I do the copy of /usr/j2se I get some recursion errors.
Any thoughts about how to add a writable /usr/j2se into the sparse zone with the least amount of effort ? Otherwise plan B would be to create a "large" zone with a writable /usr directory.
Received a great answer, that while it may not be architecturally "pure" it may get the job done.
You might just download the relevant JDK tarball and unpack that
somewhere in your zone (anywhere you like), and point SAP at it...
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/download.html
Get the one called "self extracting file"-- you can unpack that anywhere
you want.
Message was edited by: Atis Purins

Hi Russ,
no you only have to generate two RFCs to your R/3 and assign them in SMSY to for system monitoring
Then you need a Solution, assign your R/3 to the Solution, setup the system monitoring.
Regards,
uDo

OSB and Solaris Zones

Hi,
Does anybody have any experience of running OSB inside a Solaris zone?
I'm experimenting with this at the moment and would like to share the OSB installation with the global zone, but keep the /usr/etc and /usr/tmp directories where the host-specific stuff is stored private.
Thanks.

I following Oracle® Secure Backup Installation and Configuration Guide
Release 10.3 :
- To Viewing SCSI Bus Name-Instance Parameter Values in Solaris :
# cd /usr/local/oracle/backup/install
# installdriver
bash: installdriver: command not found
# ./installdriver
case: Too many arguments
How could i can run the installdriver script for SCSI information
Best Regards
Ch

Are Solaris Zones approved for SAP production environments?

All,
I am trying to find an official document from SAP that confirms that Solaris Zones are approved for use in SAP NW production environments. I checked the product availability matrix but it does not address Containers or Zones.
Thanks,
Guenther

They don't state it explicitly because you can use it. I comes with the operating system and if they would deny that, there would a be a note stating that explicitly.
On top of that, SAP would not create notes how to install and configure a zone if it wouldn't be supported
We run many instances under zones (production, test, sandbox) and make use of ZFS heavily and it works like a charm.
Markus
root@consbig / >zoneadm list -vi
ID NAME             STATUS         PATH
   0 global           running        /
   4 crmtest          running        /zone/crmtest
   5 crmqual          running        /zone/crmqual
   6 srmtest          running        /zone/srmtest
   7 solmgrt          running        /zone/solmgrt
   8 epjava           running        /zone/epjava
124 tdmshost         running        /zone/tdmshost
128 nwdi_ext_1       running        /zone/nwdi_ext_1
148 icht             running        /zone/icht
204 scheduler        running        /zone/scheduler
217 ichp             running        /zone/ichp
220 appl2mp1         running        /zone/appl2mp1
221 solmgrt          running        /zone/solmgrt
236 output           running        /zone/output
252 bicopy           running        /zone/bicopy
267 kerberos         running        /zone/kerberos
289 spnego           running        /zone/spnego
root@consbig / >zpool iostat
               capacity     operations    bandwidth
pool         used avail   read write   read write
dbdata      4,73T 64,1G     68      6 8,34M   430K
dblog       34,6G 15,2G      0     16 62,1K   123K
usrsap       118G 80,9G      2     26   188K   157K
zone        54,7G 44,8G      0     31 56,1K   135K

Installing SRSS 4.2 in a Solaris Zone ... why is it not supported

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for