IntelliJ IDEA 7 vs JDeveloper 11g Pros and Cons

Here is a thread we can discuss what we like or dislike as a comparision between IDEA 7 and JDeveloper.
Surya De mentioned in the other thread that IDEA has exceptionally strong code editing and code analysis features. In my experience I don't find IDEA's code analysis any more useful than JDeveloper's. And it's details about the code editing that I like in JDeveloper and dislike in IDEA.
Some of the details I find annoying in IDEA:
Code Folding - IDEA seems to unfold when I don't want it to; IDEA requires a multi-step menu choice whereas in JDeveloper I just right click on the folding area and select the option I want.
Java Doc generate - I prefer the way JDeveloper lets me generate the JavaDoc stub for a method.
Light bulb - I'm not sure how to describe it but in IDEA a statement may be underlined and flagged as wrong or might have an option to change it or improve it, in JDeveloper there is a nice simple light bulb I can click on to access these choices, in IDEA that "light bulb" seems to be very elusive and I can't figure out how to get it to stay there so I can click on it (most of the time I end up just manually putting in the code rather than using JDeveloper's wonderful assistance).
In what way is IDEA's Ctrl+N different from JDeveloper's Ctrl+-? They both work equivalently as far as I can see (JDeveloper is a little too aggressive in trying to guess what class you wanted)
IDEA forces me to manually set the run target instead of intelligently trying to run the class I am working on. This could be a pro or a con, but I'm used to JDeveloper's style and thus I always catch myself running the wrong thing in IDEA.
IDEA is slow compared to JDeveloper.
IDEA is terrible for building a standard client application JAR file (JDeveloper does this very nicely with it's deploy profiles).
IDEA lacks "status icons" for version control, I find the slight color change of file names to be inferior.
IDEA's non-standard usage of the term "project" is confusing.
IDEA lacks the nice little "X" close icon for closing a file you are editing.
"History" comparison I find nicer in JDeveloper.
In IDEA if I have folded code I have to hover over the code itself (making for a lot of mouse movement) to quickly view the folded code (without unfolding it), in JDeveloper I can just run my mouse up and down the left edge where the fold icons are.

Code Folding - Simple you can set it up in the Settings -> Editor -> Appearance tab an select which ones to collapse by default. All you do is mouse over the folded area in the editor and it will show you without expanding, the contents inside it...until you click that then it will explode the folded area.
Javadoc generation - Never tried it. But writing comments is easy and you dont need to know any syntax since it gives you suggestions. You will see them in yellow or red in the error stripe bar on the right just like Jdeveloper.
Light bulb - Intellij has light bults also and its context sensitive. Sometimes if you write bad code it will highlight and make it show as yellow on the stripe bar on the right and if you click then you will see a light bult on the left with a suggestion to rewrite the code and it rewrites the code for you. You can set a profile as to what the editor should look for in terms of non-optimal coding. A quick example is if you have code like (Long[]) zoneIds.toArray(new Long[0]) Intellij would rewrite it as (Long[]) zoneIds.toArray(new Long[zoneIds.size()]) and give an explanation about how the previous would be using reflection and how this one would not. This is just a small example. There are literally 100s of settings for the code analysis tool.
Speed - I dont see any difference. I am running Intellij on Mustang the latest build. And so is my JDeveloper at home.
As for the other stuff you mentioned with the project and jar file etc I dont bother because we are using Ant. I can set up the ant build file into Intellij and just right click on the target I want. But most of all I like using command line better.
IDEA does lack the little x close icon on the tab for the file you are editing but seriously hit Ctrl F4 or just middle click. Thats a bit ridiculous for mentioning that.
Local History/ CVS History - I do like JDevelopers a bit better. But Intellij has more details. As in if you fired up debug mode and made some changes in your code it will mention that as an event in your local history and that makes it easier which JDeveloper doe not have.
'In IDEA if I have folded code I have to hover over the code itself (making for a lot of mouse movement) to quickly view the folded code (without unfolding it), in JDeveloper I can just run my mouse up and down the left edge where the fold icons are. '
Dont even know how to reply to that...I dont count mouse movement as one of my criteria...
You can right click on a file in Intellij, hit Analyze code and it will show you a list of things in the code that can be cleaned up/fixed/etc based on profiles you select. They can be anything from performance fixes to too complex if statements. Pretty much as if you are doing code review. There are tons of options. And you can see all the items that Intellij is suggesting to fix, right click and just Apply Fix and they all get cleaned up in one shot. You can do this to your modules as well.
DSM - Go to Intellij's website and look this one up. Really useful for analyzing your overall codebase and finding circular dependencies etc etc.
Also the code completion in the editor in Intellij is a lot smarter. I can use Ctrl Space for the regular thing that JDeveloper does. But Ctrl SHift Space does smart code completion which I find extremely useful when writing stuff like say...uh...SomeObject obj = new SomeObject(). I can just type SomeObject obj = n and hit Ctrl Shift Space and it will write the rest of of it for me. Also if the constructor requires some parameters and you have those parameters initialized it smartly sticks those in there for me.
Also when you are naming objects or variables with Ctrl Space it can put a Java Coding Convention compliant name for your object or variable so you dont have to think of one and its pretty cool. A lot of nifty little things in there.
Lets see Alt Insert shorcut is awesome for constructor, getter/setter generation and a few others.
Also Ctrl J is an awesome feature to have where there are code templates already in place and you can just have boiler plate code for iterating over array, writing for loops etc so you just select what you want and based on what variables are in place it will automatically write your loop structures, your try catch blocks etc for you.
Also Ctrl H is another feature I like that shows in a window on the side the hierarchy of the class you are looking at.
Theres lots of little gems in there that I cant thing of writing about right now.
I still dont understand 'IDEA's non-standard usage of the term "project" is confusing.' If that is a complaint it seems you are reaching!
Like I said. Intellij is superior in terms of usability with keyboard and its editor and code analysis. You dont need findbugs or PMD for that. Its better actually than them.
But thats it. I think JDeveloper in terms of the wizards and all that I like that. Thats why I use JDeveloper when using SOA, or doing quick prototyping. And it works seamlessly if you have a full Oracle stack. But if you are using Apache or other web servers Intellij makes it easy since you jsut configure the server in your IDE and it does the rest.
Also it comes with Hibernate, Spring, support and now Flex (Intellij 8) out of the box. Thats pretty cool. Very useful.

Similar Messages

  • Oracle 11g Pros and Cons

    Hi Experts,
    We are planning to upgrade oracle from 10.2.0.2 to 11g, could any one please let us know the pros and cons of 11g over 10g
    Thanks,
    Ravi

    Sure:
    PRO: it's the only Oracle version currenly in general support.
    PRO: it provides many new features, e.g. compression for tables, indexes, backups
    CONTRA: it means you have to learn new stuff and implement something you're not used to.
    Generally, the support argument just makes other considerations superflous.
    As a SAP customer you basically have to follow the upgrade plans.
    regards,
    Lars

  • OWB Upgrade to 11g Pros and Cons

    Hi,
    we have our source,stage,target, databases and OWB currently on 10gR2. we are upgrading the databases to 11g. i am looking for the advantages/disadvantages of upgrading OWB also. is there a comparison document between OWB 10gR2 and OWB11g?

    The major differences between OWB 10.2 and 11.1 are:
    * simplified installation
    * new option for connecting to Siebel
    * new option for integrating OWB with Oracle MDM
    * bug fixes
    Unless you need any of the new options or bug fixes, I'd recommend sticking with OWB 10.2 on Oracle 11.1. We have numerous customers doing this. And, when OWB 11.2 comes out, you will be able to directly upgrade to it from OWB 10.2.
    More info regarding new features at http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/owb.111/b31278/whatsnew.htm#CHDIBHGJ
    Info about bug fixes at http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/relnotes.111/b40098/toc.htm
    Regards,
    Michelle

  • Pros and Cons af Oracle 10g upgrade to 11g

    Hi Basis Expert,
    We have an requirement of SAP upgrade which includes BW 3.5, CRM and R/3 (4.7).
    These components needs to be upgraded to the latest version
    BW 3.5 to BI 7.0
    R/3 (4.7) to ECC 6.0
    and also CRM upgrade to the new version
    The OS used is AIX and DB used is oracle 10g.
    Can anybody share the pros and cons of oracle DB upgrade from 10g to 11g after SAP upgrade.
    Regards,
    Anil.

    Hi DatabaseSAP and others,
    Thanks for your reply
    I started with the Oracle 11g software installer. But it gave an error during 71%. Error is
    Error in invoking target 'rat_on part_on dm_on olap_on sdo_on' of makefile '/oracle/DBW/112_64/rdbms/lib/ins_rdbms.mk'.
    See '/oracle/DBW/oraInventory/logs/installActions2011-10-10_12-04-03PM.log' for details.
    Abort      Retry         Continue
    But when i was going thorough the installActions2011-10-10_12-04-03PM.log . I could find that there are 7 arguments which is failed.
    Below are the argument  details
    1)INFO: Hard Limit: maximum user processes: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the hard limit for "maximum user processes" is set to at least 16384.
    INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
    INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
    INFO: -
    Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
    INFO: Expected Value:1024
    INFO: Actual Value:9223372036854775807
    INFO: -
    INFO: *********************************************
    INFO: Hard Limit: maximum user processes: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the hard limit for "maximum user processes" is set to at least 16384.
    INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
    INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
    INFO: -
    INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
    INFO: Expected Value:16384
    INFO: Actual Value:3048
    INFO: Error Message:PRVF-4354 : Proper hard limit for resource "maximum user processes" not found on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "16384" ; Found = "3048"]
    INFO: Cause: Hard limit for the resource does not meet the requirement on the specified node.
    INFO: Action: Modify the resource limits to meet the requirement.
    2)INFO: OS Kernel Parameter: ncargs: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the OS kernel parameter "ncargs" is properly set.
    INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
    INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
    INFO: -
    INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
    INFO: Expected Value:128
    INFO: Actual Value:6
    INFO: Error Message:PRVF-7543 : OS Kernel parameter "ncargs" does not have proper value on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "128" ; Found = "6"].
    INFO: Cause: Kernel parameter value does not meet the requirement.
    INFO: Action: Modify the kernel parameter value to meet the requirement.
    3)INFO: OS Kernel Parameter: tcp_ephemeral_low: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the OS kernel parameter "tcp_ephemeral_low" is properly set.
    INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
    INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
    INFO: -
    INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
    INFO: Expected Value:9000
    INFO: Actual Value:32768
    INFO: Error Message:PRVF-7543 : OS Kernel parameter "tcp_ephemeral_low" does not have proper value on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "9000" ; Found = "32768"].
    INFO: Cause: Kernel parameter value does not meet the requirement.
    INFO: Action: Modify the kernel parameter value to meet the requirement.
    4)INFO: OS Kernel Parameter: tcp_ephemeral_high: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the OS kernel parameter "tcp_ephemeral_high" is properly set.
    INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
    INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
    INFO: -
    INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
    INFO: Expected Value:65500
    INFO: Actual Value:65535
    INFO: Error Message:PRVF-7543 : OS Kernel parameter "tcp_ephemeral_high" does not have proper value on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "65500" ; Found = "65535"].
    INFO: Cause: Kernel parameter value does not meet the requirement.
    INFO: Action: Modify the kernel parameter value to meet the requirement.
    5)INFO: OS Kernel Parameter: udp_ephemeral_low: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the OS kernel parameter "udp_ephemeral_low" is properly set.
    INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
    INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
    INFO: -
    INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
    INFO: Expected Value:9000
    INFO: Actual Value:32768
    INFO: Error Message:PRVF-7543 : OS Kernel parameter "udp_ephemeral_low" does not have proper value on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "9000" ; Found = "32768"].
    INFO: Cause: Kernel parameter value does not meet the requirement.
    INFO: Action: Modify the kernel parameter value to meet the requirement.
    INFO: -
    6)INFO: OS Kernel Parameter: udp_ephemeral_high: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the OS kernel parameter "udp_ephemeral_high" is properly set.
    INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
    INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
    INFO: -
    INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
    INFO: Expected Value:65500
    INFO: Actual Value:65535
    INFO: Error Message:PRVF-7543 : OS Kernel parameter "udp_ephemeral_high" does not have proper value on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "65500" ; Found = "65535"].
    INFO: Cause: Kernel parameter value does not meet the requirement.
    INFO: Action: Modify the kernel parameter value to meet the requirement.
    7)INFO: Users With Same UID: This test checks that multiple users do not exist with user id as "0".
    INFO: Severity:CRITICAL
    INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
    INFO: -
    INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
    WARNING: Result values are not available for this verification task
    INFO: Error Message:<CV_VAL>root,|super,|zero,|</CV_VAL><CV_ERES>0</CV_ERES>
    INFO: Cause:Cause Of Problem Not Available
    INFO: Action:User Action Not Available
    INFO: *********************************************
    Please let me know what is the 7th (last one) argument.
    Regards,
    Anil Shenoy

  • 11g upgrade pros and cons

    Folks,
    If there's already a similar thread, apologies in advance.
    I wanted to gather some information on the pros and cons of upgrading to 11g from 9i and from 10g (Enterprise Editio) rdbms on Solaris.
    What are the challenges you have faced (especially if you have tweak SQLs/optimizer etc.) post upgrade?
    Any issues DURING the upgrade?
    If I missed anything obvious that worth bringing up, please do so.
    Thanks for your time!
    Regards..

    Pros/cons depends on the database type and activities ( no. of user/ data/ transaction etc).
    but i would suggest upgrade your database (9i is history).
    you will get many new features in database which are not available in 9i.
    1. upgrade on test server
    2. check the performance
    3. everything goes well
    4. upgrade on live server

  • What are the pros and cons using Active Data Guard vs Data Guard?

    My understanding is that Active Data Guard is an additional database option for Oracle 11gR2 Enterprise Edition. I need to know the pros and cons using Active Data Guard vs Data Guard in order to decide whether to get pay extra for the Active Data Guard.
    Thanks for any help.

    Hemant K Chitale wrote:
    Before jumping in to Active Data Guard, one needs to evaluate :
    a. Is there really a need to run queries on the Standby ? The Standby could / should be at a remote site so queries are "across the network". Depending on the nature of the queries and the volume of output, the "performance" of the queries may not seem to be the same.
    b. If the database is not in Maximum Protection mode, the data "seen" at the standby may not be in "real-time" synch
    c. Not all applications are truely read-only when querying. Some applications use "jobs" that write to tables when querying. Such would not work with Active DataGuard. (example : EBusiness Suite). There are very complicated ways of handling this -- and one needs to consider if the complications can be introduced and supported.
    Over the network accessing standby read only is really not an good idea, I think no one will compare performance with primary and standby,
    But some of them they want to validate data which are very critical, as it is matching with primary or not, Its an added advantage with ACTIVE DATAGUARD
    Prior to that until unless stop MRP, open database and then we need to validate, So there is an interruption of recovery, I can say its also an advantage where there is no interruption of recovery.

  • What are the pros and cons re using an intel iMac vs MacPro with LP8?

    I'm considering getting a new intel Mac in the near future (presuming a new MacPro will be released in the near future - maybe at the same time as Leopard). I compose largely for film and television and I am composing largely using a combination of loops, software instruments and some recorded live performance. I usually sync to a low res quicktime movie.
    I do like the idea of a simple and uncluttered work environment with an iMac, added to which there's also a degree of portability with the iMac however the MacPro is obviously more powerful. I'm not sure how much the difference in power between the two computers would affect me.
    Would I be compromising myself much if I went for the iMac over the MacPro? What are the pros and cons of the iMac vs the MacPro in relation to Logic Pro 8?

    In the world large-scale music composition using samples, loops, etc (especially for film) your two biggest needs are RAM and HD speed/access. The imac looses big time in this department (as a single computer at least) as it can only be upgraded to 4gb ram, and only holds one internal HD, and also lacks any PCI expansion for DSP cards, audio interfaces, etc.
    In generalyou want to separate your data vs applications as much as possible, to ensure both can be accessed quickly and easily by the computer. So its best to have your system software / applications on one internal HD, and your logic data (samples, audio recordings, loops) on another drive(s). You can do this with an iMac via USB, FW800, & FW400, but depending on how big your projects get, how many USB and FW drives / interfaces you use, and how much data you need to stream, you could overload the buss on the imac (not sure if it has multiple busses or not). Plus speed wise, internal SATA are much faster than external drives, and the mac pro with its 4 internal slots seems like a great choice for speed and flexibility.
    However, if you dont find yourself doing large scale projects, then you might be better off going with an imac. We just purchased one for my father and it runs great! It blows the socks off of my Dual 2.5 G5 tower in terms of CPU speed! If you run into problems running things from the imac, you could always add a mac-mini down the road to stream sample libs, as a Logic node, etc, which seems to be a much more cost effective solution.
    I hope this was helpful, but I probably just made the decision harder . In fact, if I were to start over today, I dont know if I'd go with a MacPro, or an iMac / mac mini combination. they both seem to have their advantages / disadvantages.
    Best of luck!

  • Pros and Cons of putting jspx pages under WEB-INF

    Greetings All,
    I have been using JHeadstart release 10.1.3 Prod for a while now and was generating pages in various subdirectories under WEB-INF/pages/ and things are working fine.
    However, recently I came across a post in jDeveloper forum Re: Access JSF Pages within WEB-INF directory where Frank Nimphius has mentioned that there is no sense in putting JSP files that are used with JSF into WEB-INF.
    I know that in struts world it makes sense to put the jsp files under WEB-INF to prevent the users from directly accessing them and force them to access them only via struts actions/navigation rules; but in JSF world we anyway expose the jspx names to the user and in-fact if we keep the pages under WEB-INF the url to access the pages also contains 'faces/WEB-INF/...'
    Thus, I would like to get opinion from various experienced professionals participating in this forum and more so from JHeadStart team members on Pros and Cons of putting jspx pages under WEB-INF
    regards - rutwik

    Rutwik,
    From your reply it seems that, for now, there should not be any impact on us as long as we don't upgrade to JDeveloper 10.1.3.1, as anyway the current JHS version is not certified against it.
    Correct.
    However, to be compatible with future releases of JHS and JDeveloper, will it be good to change the location of pages in our JHeadStart definitions to move them a directories above the WEB-INF etc and re-run the JHeadStart generators?
    Yes.
    Or, will the patch take care of modifying the current JHeadStart definations?
    No, Service Update 1 has a different default value for the pages dir , it is now /pages/ instead of /WEB-INF/page/, that's all.
    Also, with this patch, will we be able to upgrade to jDeveloper 10.1.3.1, which we would like to do once we have a production release?
    Yes, Service Update 1 is compatible with JDev 10.1.3.1
    Steven Davelaar,
    JHeadstart Team.

  • Using CLOB data type - Pros and Cons

    Dear Gurus,
    We are designing a database that will be receiving comments from external data source. These comments are stored as CLOB in the external database. We found that only 1% of incoming data will be larger than 4000 characters and are now evaluating the Pros and Cons of storing only 4000 characters of incoming comments in VARCHAR2 data type or using CLOB data type.
    Some of the concerns brought up during discussion were:
    - having to store CLOBs in separate tablespace;
    - applications, such Toad require changing defaults settings to display CLOBs in the grid. Default value is not to display them;
    - applications that build web page with CLOBs will be struggling to fit 18 thousand chararcters of which 17 thousand are blank lines;
    - cashing CLOBs in memory will consume big chunk of data buffers which will affect performance;
    - to manipulate CLOBs you need PL/SQL anonymous block or procedure;
    - bind variables cannot be assigned CLOB value;
    - dynamic SQL cannot use CLOBs;
    - temp tables don't work very well with CLOBs;
    - fuzzy logic search on CLOBs is ineffective;
    - not all ODBC drivers support Oracle CLOBs
    - UNION, MINUS, INTERSECT don't work with CLOBs
    I have not delt with CLOB data type in the past, so I am hoping to hear from you of any possible issues/hastles we may encounter?

    848428 wrote:
    Dear Gurus,
    We are designing a database that will be receiving comments from external data source. These comments are stored as CLOB in the external database. We found that only 1% of incoming data will be larger than 4000 characters and are now evaluating the Pros and Cons of storing only 4000 characters of incoming comments in VARCHAR2 data type or using CLOB data type.
    Some of the concerns brought up during discussion were:
    - having to store CLOBs in separate tablespace;They can be stored inline too. Depends on requirements.
    - applications, such Toad require changing defaults settings to display CLOBs in the grid. Default value is not to display them;Toad is a developer tool so that shouldn't matter. What should matter is how you display the data to end users etc. but that will depend on the interface. Some can handle CLOBs and others not. Again, it depends on the requirements.
    - applications that build web page with CLOBs will be struggling to fit 18 thousand chararcters of which 17 thousand are blank lines;Why would they struggle? 18,000 characters is only around 18k in file size, that's not that big to a web page.
    - cashing CLOBs in memory will consume big chunk of data buffers which will affect performance;Who's caching them in memory? What are you planning on doing with these CLOBs? There's no real reason they should impact performance any more than anything else, but it depends on your requirements as to how you plan to use them.
    - to manipulate CLOBs you need PL/SQL anonymous block or procedure;You can manipulate CLOBs in SQL too, using the DBMS_LOB package.
    - bind variables cannot be assigned CLOB value;Are you sure?
    - dynamic SQL cannot use CLOBs;Yes it can. 11g supports CLOBs for EXECUTE IMMEDIATE statements and pre 11g you can use the DBMS_SQL package with CLOB's split into a VARCHAR2S structure.
    - temp tables don't work very well with CLOBs;What do you mean "don't work well"?
    - fuzzy logic search on CLOBs is ineffective;Seems like you're pulling information from various sources without context. Again, it depends on your requirements as to how you are going to use the CLOB's
    - not all ODBC drivers support Oracle CLOBs not all, but there are some. Again, it depends what you want to achieve.
    - UNION, MINUS, INTERSECT don't work with CLOBsTrue.
    I have not delt with CLOB data type in the past, so I am hoping to hear from you of any possible issues/hastles we may encounter?You may have more hassle if you "need" to accept more than 4000 characters and you are splitting it into seperate columns or rows, when a CLOB would do it easily.
    It seems as though you are trying to find all the negative aspects of CLOBs and ignoring all the positive aspects, and also ignoring the negative aspects of not using CLOB's.
    Without context you're assumptions are just that, assumptions, so nobody can tell you if it will be right or wrong to use them. CLOB's do have their uses, just as XMLTYPE's have their uses etc. If you're using them for the right reasons then great, but if you're ignoring them for the wrong reasons then you'll suffer.

  • What are the pros and cons of running iTunes from an SD card with a Retina MBP?

    Hello,
    I'm thinking about getting a Retina MBP, but I think the default storage of 256GB is way to small to be used as a main computer and the upgrade to 512GB is very expensive. I was thinking of ways to reduce bulky files and was considering running iTunes from an SD card. Does anybody have any experience with doing this, what pros and cons did you discover?

    I wouldn't even try storing multiple iTunes libraries on SD cards. Better idea - what I do - is store the majority of my music on an external hard drive and just my 'must have' tunes on my internal SSD. I have a 512GB SSD and use around 170GB for iTunes. On my external drive, I had about 440GB in tunes (last time I checked).
    You can 'switch' libraries by holding down the option key when you launch iTunes. It's the best of both worlds - storage for on-the-go, must-haves, and an entire library of "all" of my music.
    256GB should be plenty of space - I just store so much music on my internal SSD because I can!
    Clinton

  • Pros and Cons of upgrading GT60 RAID0 to SSD and HDD

    I purchased a GT60-0NCR-002US from Amazon last fall and am thinking of upgrading the HD set up.
    Currently it has 2 500gb drives arranged in a RAID0.
    I'm considering upgrading this to a 256GB SSD and a 1TB HDD and am curious to get some feedback about the pros and cons of doing this.
    I'm assuming this setup would be considerably faster than the current one since I'd have the OS and all program files on the SSD. I'm not sure whether the 7200rpm 32gb cache HDD would be faster or slower than the current RAID0 but since this would only contain my documents and media, I don't think it's of that much concern.
    Another question I have is how I'd go about getting Windows back on the system after replacing the hard drives. Could I reinstall an image of the current OS or would the fact that I'm changing the hard drive set up make that impossible?
    Any advice would be appreciated.

    Quote from: joshsayers on 23-May-13, 09:18:47
    I just noticed on the original Amazon page where I bought the computer that the rpm of each 500GB disk is 7200. Considering they are in a RAID0 format, wouldn't I then be sacrificing speed going to one 1TB 7200rpm drive?
    Maybe the decrease in speed for the data/media HDD would be more than compensated by having the OS and all software run off an SSD drive, though...
    Regarding the re-installation of Windows: yes, I have the backup disk here. So it would just be a matter of re-installing on the SSD drive before the regular HD was installed? I called MSI help and asked them about this and the guy told me that because I would be going from RAID0 to two separate HDDs that this would affect the BIOS and thus the original Windows backup disk would be obsolete. Any truth to this?
    The SSD + HDD will be much better overall. For media, does it really MATTER how fast it is? In all honesty, not really. The SSD makes everything else snappy, so what if you have to wait an extra 10 seconds when you copy a movie over and stuff? I wouldn't care, overall the laptop will FEEL much faster, and it generally will be.
    There is SOME truth to what he said. You will have to change the bios to go from a RAID to AHCI or IDE (AHCI is preferred, but it may not work....I'm not sure). THAT much is true. The restore disk should work as usual though. It doesn't care WHERE it gets installed at, just that it gets installed. Atleast, it didn't matter for me.

  • HT204053 What are the pros and cons of 1) choosing to use the SAME Apple ID for iCloud services on one side, and purchases on the iTunes Store, App Store, and iBookstore, on the other side; or 2) to have and use two separate Apple Ids for these "two sides

    All is in the title, so I repeat it below with a better identation.
    What are the pros and cons of
    1) choosing to use the SAME
                                                  Apple ID for iCloud services on one side, and
                                                  purchases on the iTunes Store, App Store, and iBookstore, on the other side; or
    2) to have and use two separate Apple Ids for these "two sides"?
    P.S.
    I have loads and loads of free podcasts in iTunes in my iMac, that are certainly more thant the 5 gigas the iCloud provides for free, so I don't want those to go to the cloud. But this is perhaps a different question...
    Also need to mention that I have itunes on a mac, a pc and an iphone.
    Sorry to look so silly with this question, but I don't get the "big picture".

    You need to create a user account for your wife (or yourself depending on who has the current user account). When syncing, each of you should sign in as a separate user, login to iTunes and then sync. I had this problem when my sister got an iPhone. When we did her initial sync, everything on my iPhone showed up on hers. Apple gave me this solution.

  • What are the Pros and Cons while joining tables at DF and Universe level

    Hi Experts,
    I am new to Data federator designer. I need help on the below.
    Could you please let me know the Pros and Cons while joining the source tables in data federator
    And While joining the DF target tables in universe designer.
    Regards,
    Gana

    Hi,
    1. I have created target tables based on source tables with one to one mapping and then join all target tables in universe.
    Ex: Source tables: Infocube text tables, fact tables and 3rd party data base table
    Target tables:Target tables are same as source tables
    --- Yes this is the way to create target Tables  and join them in the universe.These target Tables gives you the flexibility  like in future your requirement is to add one more object based on some calculation which is not possible in the universe so that time you can create  one more column in the target table and do the calculation. at the same time if you are using source table you can not do anything.
    2. Created single target table with all objects of source tables and merged all sources tables data.
    Ex: Source tables: Infocube text tables, fact tables and 3rd party data base table
    Target table: Single table.
    --- This is bit complex structure to merge all tables data in the one target table.in this situation you have to put more efforts and it is more complex.basically this type of target table is useful when you are merging data by multiple source into single  or  creating one target table based on the  union of tables by adding two mapping rules or more and you can not join tables in universe.
    Better approach is first 1. create target tables based on the source tables and join them in the universe.
    Thanks,
    Amit

  • Pros and Cons not determining / having a Delivery Plant in Sales Order?

    Hi Mates
    Here I have come-up with one more (weired?) requirement from my client.
    We have two plants manufacturing same product and supplying to all customers (some time in same sales order with two different line items).
    At the timeof creating a sales order, marketing does't know from which plant the material will move and hence they don't want to fill the Delivering Plant field (VBRP-BUKRS at Shipping tab) for each Item.
    They are insisting me to map it as above though I had explained about various pros and cons for not determining a mandatory delivery plant
    in sales order like the requirements and shipping stuff.
    Yet, yet they want this.
    Has anyone come across this kind of requirement before? What best you had done for that?
    Can I ask you what are the Pros and cons on not having a Delivery Plant at Sales Order level?
    what if I could determine it Delivery level?
    Any comments, suggestions, replies and advices are taken humbly.
    Cheers
    Ajay Kumar Veeranki

    Dear Mahulenka
    Thanks a lot for the reply. It do have helped me.
    Yest it is VBAP-WERKS (typo error ).
    Infact I had given the same solution for the issue.
    Interstingly, they are insisting on a better solution fit for their requirement. Anyway shall 'highlight' the points again to them try to get it solved
    Just wondering has anyone faced the same situation before.
    Thanks again for the reply and good luck
    Best Regards
    Ajay Kumar Veeranki

  • What are the Pros and Cons of Using Batch Numbers over Serialization

    Dear SAP Gurus:
    Will someone please give me the benefits of using Batch Management over serial numbers in this case scenerio, or vice versa:
    Client wants to trace all the components of an assembly in a BOM.  Even the Raw material.  The client sends the material out today and has the vendor assign serial numbers to the individual pieces, the client gives the range of serial numbers to use.  We are looking at using batch numbers to accomplish this and issue one material and batch number to a production order.  Then use MB56 batch where used functionality to view history.  I am wanting to understand the benefits of this.  Please advise and points will be awarded as always. 
    Also, in this scenerio, can you issue multiple material/batch numbers to one vendor op that has its own production order?

    Yes it is a subcontract. 
    Example:  This is the solution but need the pros and cons of doing this scenerio
    Sheet of metal sent to vendor to make lets say 1800 peices of material number nas5703-01.  All 1800 pieces come back and issued to a production work order using one bacth number for one material item so that batch number can be traced in history in MB56 and a fit up report.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Annotation options

    Can I put two optionals attributes in Annotation ? I want to put two integers, mininus and maximus, and in the annotation I want to put one of them or both. Example: @A(min="") or @A(max="") or @A(min="" max="") but not @A()

  • IPhoto 6 Displaying Reduced Pictures?

    I've just installed iPhoto 6 from iPhoto 4. My problem is that when I view a slideshow of mixed aspect-ratio photos, iPhoto doesn't display all of them correctly. With iPhoto 4, a slideshow would always aim to make the photo fit the screen as far as

  • Can text be formatted when using 'Append report text.vi'?

    The example that ships with LabVIEW 7 'Generate Report from Template (Word).vi' uses 'Append report text' to insert text into a word template via bookmarks. My question is can this text be formatted in any way (e.g. fontsize, fontcolor, ...)? It seem

  • XML Parser Xtra

    Hi, I've used the XML parser Xtra in my movie. How can I distrubute it as a projector. Is the XML parser Xtra included in Director? how can I include it in a projector? Thanks 3ddev

  • Web Link

    Hi, How to make web address link to website in oracle .... example www.hotmail.com. Version 6i ,10g. Regards,