Interface virtual-template limitations

I am using 7204 as access concentrator for PPPOA sessions using interface virtual-templates. I want to know the maximum number of supported virtual interfaces. for 12.0, it's stated in cco documents that the maximum number of virtual interfaces is 300. starting from 12.2, it's mentioned that the maximum number is platform dependant. I am runing 12.2(27).
Thanks in advance...
Karim.

Hello Karim,
I think you can issue the command ´show idb´ to see how many software IDB´s (and the virtual template is a software IDB) are supported by your router.
Refer to the document below for additional info:
Maximum Number of Interfaces and Subinterfaces for Cisco IOS Platforms: IDB Limits
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_tech_note09186a0080094322.shtml
HTH,
GP

Similar Messages

What is virtual template interface

hi all
Please explain me what is vitual template interface and when should used.how can someone used it to bind physical intfaces under virtual templte int?

Hi,
A virtual template interface is used to provide the configuration for dynamically created Virtual-Access interfaces. It is created by users and can be saved in nonvolatile RAM (NVRAM).
Once the virtual template interface is created, it can be configured in the same way as a serial interface.
To create a virtual template interface that can be configured and applied dynamically in creating virtual access interfaces, use the interface virtual-template command in global configuration mode.
Virtual template interfaces can be created and applied by various applications such as Virtual Profiles, virtual private dialup networks (VPDN), PPP over ATM, PPP over Frame Relay, protocol translation, and Multichassis Multilink PPP (MMP).
Following are FR and ATM examples:
interface Serial1/0.1 point-to-point
bandwidth 128
frame-relay interface-dlci 51 ppp Virtual-Template1
class FRTS
interface ATM1/0.52 point-to-point
ip vrf forwarding customer
pvc 101/52
abr 167 167
oam-pvc manage
encapsulation aal5ciscoppp virtual-Template 1
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_command_reference_chapter09186a0080080d36.html#wp1017915
HTH, please do rate all helpful replies,
Mohammed Mahmoud.

Virtual template interface vs Dialer interface?

Hi all,
I am little confusing about virtual template interface and dialer interface. I understood that both of them are logical interface and will be mapped to physical interface dynamically. What is different? When would I use virtual template interface or dialer interface?
Please suggest too.
Thanks a lot,
Nitass

hi
AFAIK we use virtual template in L2TP scenarios where you will have LAC and LNS .
the configs related to VT comes in LNS which is ur local network server for your remote clients from where the L2 tunnel gets orginated.
And about your dialer interfaces we use them very frequently in most of the situations like where you require to club 2 Physical isdn lines and to make use them as a single pipe or using single isdn line and connect it to 2 different locations using 2 B channels using 2 dialers...
if you need to know more about them would suggest to check out this link which will give fair idea about them..
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk801/tsd_technology_support_category_home.html
hope this helps u out..
regds

PPPoX Virtual-Template assignment via Radius Attribute

I'd like to optionally apply ACLs to PPP users (PPPoX). I see two strategies: a) apply an ACL directly via radius attributes or b) define the ACL in the Virtual-Template on the BRAS and determine the Virtual-Template ID via radius attribute. Has anyone done this? If so, any suggestions on the best way to move forward? I think I'd prefer option B as I could also use it to assign VRFs etc (one Virtual-Template per VRF).
TIA

The only way I could get this to work is have the ACS server reference an ACL configured on the switch via name or number and send in the filter-id attribute. On the switch I configured the default setting for attribute 11 to apply inbound "
radius-server attribute 11 default direction in". If you do a "sh authentication sessions interface gx/x" it'll show the filter-ID setting but if you do a "show ip interface gx/x" it still shows the default-acl being applied. It works, just a bit confusing because of that default-acl still showing up. Anyone else experience the same?

Cisco 2800 - Multiple VPNs Using Virtual-Template

Hello List,
I have a question related to the way of setting up multiple VPNs using
virtual-template configuration (Cisco calls this Dynamic VPN): how can
I make my configuration to be a "spoke" type VPN rather than "hub" type
without using "crypto map" on the physical interface?
Here is how it works now (the VPN hub config):
!!! the VPN hub config
crypto keyring PSKs
pre-shared-key address <peer_ip> key 6 ************
crypto isakmp profile ISAKMP_Profile
keyring PSKs
self-identity address
match identity address <peer_ip> 255.255.255.255
virtual-template 1
crypto ipsec transform-set Transform_Set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec profile IPSEC_Profile
set transform-set Transform_Set
set isakmp-profile ISAKMP_Profile
interface Loopback1007
description This is a public IP address from a range routed via my
gatey IP address (see bellow)
ip address <my_VPN-hub_ip> 255.255.255.255
no ip redirects
interface Multilink1
description This is my gateway IP address facing the ISP
ip address <my_public_IP> 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
ip nbar protocol-discovery
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
rate-limit input access-group 102 8000 1500 2000 conform-action
transmit exceed-action drop
ip route-cache flow
no cdp enable
ppp multilink
ppp multilink fragment delay 20
ppp multilink interleave
ppp multilink group 1
ppp multilink multiclass
service-policy output qos_pm-outbound
interface Serial0/0/0
description 1st Serial Interface to ISP
bandwidth 2048
no ip address
encapsulation ppp
ip route-cache flow
no fair-queue
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1
interface Serial0/0/1
description 2nd Serial Interface to ISP
bandwidth 2048
no ip address
encapsulation ppp
ip route-cache flow
no fair-queue
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1
interface Virtual-Template1 type tunnel
ip unnumbered Loopback1007
ip access-group vpn_acl-tunnel-encr-in in
ip access-group vpn_acl-tunnel-encr-out out
ip mtu 1400
ip route-cache flow
tunnel source Loopback1007
tunnel mode ipsec ipv4
tunnel sequence-datagrams
tunnel checksum
tunnel path-mtu-discovery
tunnel protection ipsec profile IPSEC_Profile
service-policy output qos_pm-VPN
ip access-list extended vpn_acl-tunnel-encr-in
permit ip 172.20.40.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255
ip access-list extended vpn_acl-tunnel-encr-out
permit ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 172.20.40.0 0.0.0.255
!!! the Spoke VPN is configured by my peers (Cisco routers, PIXes,
Cisco VPN concentrators)
!!! all follow the standard crypto map config on the physical
interface.
!!! i.e. http://www.vpnc.org/InteropProfiles/cisco-ios.txt
It is obvious that with my router configured as a VPN hub, if the
tunnel dies, I need to wait for the peer to reset the tunnel, all this
time my clients in my network are not able to access the remote sites.
The reason to use the virtual-template interfaces as suppose to
traditional "crypto map" way, is that my peers do not want to share the
same VPN end-point between themselves (different companies all
together) and they are very strict in regards to ACLs. As I don't have
a VPN device for each one of them and their number increases (I have 5
separate tunnels right now with a potential grow to 15 in the next 3
months), I need to find a way to get rid of the hub config in my end (I
did not have much choice there when I migrated to this platform from a
linux box).
Pros for the Virtual-Template:
- separate QoS for each tunnel
- ACLs configured directly on the tunnel interface (grater flexibility)
- tunnel end-point IP address can be part of a range BGP advertised via
multiple ISP links
Cons:
- hub config, the tunnel needs to be reseted by the peer
Any help is very much appreciated. Thank you,
Adrian

Hope the following link will help you
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a008019d6f7.shtml

Display Template limitation of 50 items

Hi,
is there a way to get over the Display Template limitation of 50 items?
keren tsur

I found a workaround to this limitation and have blogged about it here:
http://www.scottewing.net/Blog/Post/2/Getting-Around-the-Content-Search-Web-Part%27s-50-Results-Limit
It requires writing server-side code using reflection and deploying a farm solution, so if you don't have that option then you may be stuck. There's also a client-side solution here but it doesn't work for anonymous access:
http://sharepoint-community.net/forum/topics/how-to-override-content-by-search-web-part-s-limit-of-50-results
In most cases I'd agree that you shouldn't show more than 50 results on a page. However, I believe there are almost always exceptions to every rule. In my case, I needed to go over this limit because we were porting a WordPress site
over that had a page that needed this, and we needed it to behave the same way.
- Scott

Virtual-template

Using Voice-over-IP, ConfigMaker suggest to use "Multilink Virtual-Template" to improve the quality of the voice.
No problem in a point-to-point connection, with only 2 routers.
But if I have 8 router (1 main-site and 7 subsidiary) ? Need I configure multiple "Virtual-Template" ? If YES, how?
Thank's
Claudio

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk652/tk698/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080101d5c.shtml
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk652/tk698/technologies_white_paper09186a00800d6b73.shtml

PI 7.1 "stateless" service interfaces prerequisites and limitations

are there any prerequisites and limitations for "stateless" Service interfaces.
We are directly implementing PI 7.1, (i.e not upgrading form 7.0 or 3.0).
so for all our service interfaces, shall we safely use tne interface pattern "statelss" instead of "Stateless(xi 3.0 compatible)".
if use the "stateless", are there any addition prerequisites or constraints/limitations.
can we use abap proxies, java proxies, providing webservices via xi, and consuming other webserivces in xi, all adapters, asynch, synch scenarios with "stateless" interface patterns.
In short, are there any things that can be done using "Stateless(xi 3.0 compatible)" and cannot be done using "stateless" interface
are there any specific requirements for using "Stateless(xi 3.0 compatible)" even in newly implemented PI 7.1
thanks in advance,
Madhu.

When it is an upgrade from 7.0 to 7.1 the default Interface pattern is Stateless (XI 30 Compatible)
Using Stateless Interface Patterns wont cause any harm/ restriction on any of the development.
The only twist will be in the way a condition is specified in the Receiver Determination.
For any Interface pattern (other than Stateless(XI30 Compatible)) you wont be able to see the message structure in the Condition Editor of Receiver Determination. All other functionality (Async, Sync, Proxy) will be available.
In such a case Condition should be specified as shown in this blog: /people/abhishek.salvi/blog/2009/07/15/sap-pi71-receiver-determination-xpath-and-you
Regards,
Abhishek.

Prime Infrastructure 2.1.1 cannot add more than two interfaces in Dynamic Interface Controller Templates

Cisco Prime Infrastructure is a damned nightmare of browser bugs (some features work in IE8, some in IE9, and some only in Firefox). And I am not sure if what I am experiencing is a browser bug - or a real bug - or something that I was able to do before and can't any more? I would love for someone to either explain why this is happening to me, or reproduce the bug!
I'm running Prime 2.1.1. I am doing this ...
Configure > Controller Template Launchpad
System > Dynamic Interface
Select a command > Add interface (GO)
Enter all the properties - roll to the bottom of the page, and click Apply to Controllers
I have four controllers. And normally I would add an interface for each controller. But I can only create two out of the four. It doesn't matter which two I choose. When I click Add under Manage Interfaces for the third controller, I cannot click the Done button to apply it (see screenshot, attached). I have found that if I change the VLAN to something else, it will let me save it. But ... why? I went back and reviewed all of my existing interface templates and I am not doing anything different. Although, they were all created a long while ago using WCS 7.x.
Any help, guidance, or confirmation of insanity would be appreciated.
-Steve Ballantyne

I doubt I will get any hits on this here but I always try. I opened a TAC case. I will come back and comment on whatever they find.

Web - 500 images max? Why are the flash templates limited to 500?

Is there any reason for limiting the templates to 500? is there a work-around?
Lorenzo

> Because nobody should be subjected to
> such a crazy large slideshow.
LOL!
On a more serious note, nobody should be subject to waiting while LR processes and uploads over 2000 images. Even on a fast machine that would take some serious time.
I have to wonder if LR is the best application for such large numbers of images. I'd suspect there are better programs out there, ones that don't insist on re-rendering the images every time and re-uploading them all. Dreamweaver comes to mind as an obvious choice.
Should you insist on using LR, possibly consider breaking the images up into galleries. The folks at Theturninggate have some templates that allow you to organize galleries. I haven't used them, so I don't know specifics, but they look like they do some really neat stuff, and they have some automation options to help make it easier.

Prime web interface and template

Dear,
I'm trying do configure the Prime Infrastructure 2.2, in the first access was okay, but now when I try to access by web interface they return with message "username or password invalid", but I didn´t change the password, I can access the Prime using PUTTY SSH with the same user, just not using web interface.
Other probleme, I was trying to importe a template to discovery all switches in my LAN, but all device import by template don´t appear and in the list of device the apper as device missing something with the simble !.
Attach is the template.

Hi Afroj,
Today I could log in without problem, I didn´t nothing and is working now. Yesterday I tryed all browser and I couldn't have access.
About the template still the same problem. Do you have any idea what's the problem?
Thanks

STP Logical Interfaces, virtual ports

As you probably know one have to take in account the max available numbers of virtual ports and logical interfaces for Spanning Tree when designing a switched network based on catalyst 6500's. Does somebody know if you also have these parameters if you're designing a network based on 4500's or 3750 stacks? And where to find it on the Cisco site
Rgrds

My issue deals with Spanning Tree Protocol or better the scalability of STP. see the following document:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/122sx/ol_4164.htm#wp26366
For choosing the right spanning tree protocol (RPVST+ or MST) you have to take logical interfaces and virtual ports into account on the 6500 platform. But what if you decide to use a different platform, for instance a 3750 stack.
Rgrds
Aad

Virtual Memory Limits??

My system chokes allocating 1GB of memory.
vm_allocate(size=1069056) failed (error code=3)
There are 8GB of memory available. Is there a kernel tuning parameter I can tweak or am I mis-reading the error message?

I believe you're misreading the error message. Virtual Memory is not RAM, it's disk space being used as RAM. At the same time, there is no parameter you could possibly change to make it behave any differently.
This error has come up before, and it's faily typical to reset your PRAM and try again to see if the problem is resolved. Aside from that, I'll have to leave it to others who have more experience in that area.
Mulder
If this answered you question, please consider awarding some points. Why Reward Points?
iMac G4 700Mhz Mac OS X (10.3.9)

Router Dead , when i applied QOS on virtual-temp interface for vpn !!

hi all ,
i have a simple brief topology below :
PSTN======(R1-7206)>F1=======F2>(R2-7604 catalyst)>>>F1=========Internet
i have two router
R2========>MLS 7604
R1======>cisco 7204
on R2 , Im doing matching to QOS by dscp , im matching acls ips from internet with dscp values :
here is CONFIG for matching :
Gateway7600#sh policy-map LLQX
Policy Map LLQX
    Class YOUTUBE
      set ip dscp af43
    Class FACEBOOKVIDEOS
      set ip dscp af33
    Class HTTP
      set dscp af23
    Class DNSQOS
      set dscp af13
    Class class-default
      set ip dscp af11
================
Gateway7600#sh class-map
Class Map match-all FACEBOOKVIDEOS (id 7)
   Match access-group name facebookvideos
Class Map match-all DNSQOS (id 8)
   Match access-group name dnsqos
Class Map match-all HTTP (id 6)
   Match access-group name browsing
Class Map match-any class-default (id 0)
   Match any
Class Map match-all YOUTUBE (id 5)
   Match access-group name youtube
Gateway7600#
=========================================================
on this router i applied this policy map on interfaxce F1 in direction
and here matching is well :
Gateway7600#sh policy-map interface gigabitEthernet 1/5 in
GigabitEthernet1/5
Service-policy input: LLQX
    class-map: rate-limit (match-all)
      Match: access-group name rate-limit
      police :
        4088000 bps 384000 limit 384000 extended limit
      Earl in slot 1 :
        139044930 bytes
        30 second offered rate 143032 bps
        aggregate-forwarded 134420937 bytes action: transmit
        exceeded 4623993 bytes action: drop
        aggregate-forward 22544 bps exceed 0 bps
    class-map: YOUTUBE (match-all)
      Match: access-group name youtube
      set dscp 38:
      Earl in slot 1 :
        132693939697 bytes
        30 second offered rate 212144928 bps
        aggregate-forwarded 132693939697 bytes
    class-map: FACEBOOKVIDEOS (match-all)
      Match: access-group name facebookvideos
      set dscp 30:
      Earl in slot 1 :
        10726758352 bytes
        30 second offered rate 20682720 bps
        aggregate-forwarded 10726758352 bytes
    class-map: HTTP (match-all)
      Match: access-group name browsing
      set dscp 22:
      Earl in slot 1 :
        56874058537 bytes
        30 second offered rate 92669832 bps
        aggregate-forwarded 56874058537 bytes
    class-map: DNSQOS (match-all)
      Match: access-group name dnsqos
      set dscp 14:
      Earl in slot 1 :
        160308954 bytes
        30 second offered rate 303552 bps
        aggregate-forwarded 160308954 bytes
    class-map: class-default (match-any)
      Match: any
      set dscp 10:
      Earl in slot 1 :
        67394864030 bytes
        30 second offered rate 126884864 bps
        aggregate-forwarded 67394864030 bytes
=================================================================================
now the problem is below
on router 7200 , it is LNS router connected with LAC roiuter for ADSL customers.
now here is config of policy map on 7200 router:
R11#sh policy-map
Policy Map MATCH_MARKS
    Class MATCH_YOUTUBE
      bandwidth 220000 (kbps)
    Class MATCH_FACEBOOKVIDEOS
      bandwidth 20000 (kbps)
    Class MATCH_HTTP
      bandwidth 100000 (kbps)
=========================================================
R1#sh class-map
Class Map match-all MATCH_FACEBOOKVIDEOS (id 2)
   Match ip dscp af33 (30)
Class Map match-all MATCH_HTTP (id 3)
   Match ip dscp af23 (22)
Class Map match-any class-default (id 0)
   Match any
Class Map match-all MATCH_YOUTUBE (id 1)
   Match ip dscp af43 (38)
==========================================================
here is virtual-template interface before i apply the QOS
R1#sh running-config interface virtual-template 1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 352 bytes
interface Virtual-Template1
bandwidth 1000000
ip unnumbered Loopback0
ip tcp adjust-mss 1412
ip policy route-map private
no logging event link-status
qos pre-classify
peer default ip address pool bitsead1 bitsead2
ppp mtu adaptive
ppp authentication pap vpdn
ppp authorization vpdn
ppp accounting vpdn
max-reserved-bandwidth 90
end
=========================================
when i apply the command
(service-poliy output MATCH_MAKRS ) under virtual-template interface i have console logs :
Insufficient bandwidth 149760 kbps for the bandwidth guarantee (220000)
Insufficient bandwidth 149760 kbps for the bandwidth guarantee (220000)
Insufficient bandwidth 149760 kbps for the bandwidth guarantee (220000)
also i have
*Jul 9 22:28:38.242: Interface Virtual-Access2551 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.250: Interface Virtual-Access627 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.258: Interface Virtual-Access786 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.266: Interface Virtual-Access623 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.274: Interface Virtual-Access2559 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.282: Interface Virtual-Access2281 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.290: Interface Virtual-Access142 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:40.262: %SYS-2-INTSCHED: 'suspend' at level 3 -Process= "VTEMPLATE Background Mgr", ipl= 3, pid= 278, -Traceback= 0x756FF0z 0x3439C58z 0x2778D70z 0x2CACCD0z 0x2CC63E0z 0x2CC7FF8z 0x2CADC74z 0x2CBE058z 0x2CA0340z 0x2CA04F8z 0x2E0BB18z 0x2D23378z 0x2D1825Cz 0x2D18738z 0x2E66FE0z 0x2D971ACz
*Jul 9 22:28:40.262: %SYS-2-INTSCHED: 'suspend' at level 3 -Process= "VTEMPLATE Background Mgr", ipl= 3, pid= 278, -Traceback= 0x756FF0z 0x3439C58z 0x2778D70z 0x2CACD28z 0x2CC63E0z 0x2CC7FF8z 0x2CADC74z 0x2CBE058z 0x2CA0340z 0x2CA04F8z 0x2E0BB18z 0x2D23378z 0x2D1825Cz 0x2D18738z 0x2E66FE0z 0x2D971ACz
after i apply it ,
the cpu is 100 % and the router got down !!!
now
what is the problem ????
here is ios for 7200 router
R1#sh version
Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200P-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T7, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2012 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Tue 28-Feb-12 12:53 by prod_rel_team
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.4(12.2r)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Bras1 uptime is 13 weeks, 1 day, 9 hours, 24 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload at 16:24:51 GMT+3 Tue Jun 17 2003
System image file is "disk2:c7200p-adventerprisek9-mz.124-24.T7.bin"
Last reload reason: Reload Command
This product contains cryptographic features and is subject to United
States and local country laws governing import, export, transfer and
use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply
third-party authority to import, export, distribute or use encryption.
Importers, exporters, distributors and users are responsible for
compliance with U.S. and local country laws. By using this product you
agree to comply with applicable laws and regulations. If you are unable
to comply with U.S. and local laws, return this product immediately.
A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic products may be found at:
http://www.cisco.com/wwl/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html
If you require further assistance please contact us by sending email to
[email protected].
Cisco 7206VXR (NPE-G2) processor (revision A) with 917504K/65536K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID 36858624
MPC7448 CPU at 1666Mhz, Implementation 0, Rev 2.2
6 slot VXR midplane, Version 2.11
Last reset from power-on
PCI bus mb1 (Slots 1, 3 and 5) has a capacity of 600 bandwidth points.
Current configuration on bus mb1 has a total of 0 bandwidth points.
This configuration is within the PCI bus capacity and is supported.
PCI bus mb2 (Slots 2, 4 and 6) has a capacity of 600 bandwidth points.
Current configuration on bus mb2 has a total of 0 bandwidth points.
This configuration is within the PCI bus capacity and is supported.
Please refer to the following document "Cisco 7200 Series Port Adaptor
Hardware Configuration Guidelines" on Cisco.com <http://www.cisco.com>
for c7200 bandwidth points oversubscription and usage guidelines.
1 FastEthernet interface
3 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
2045K bytes of NVRAM.
250880K bytes of ATA PCMCIA card at slot 2 (Sector size 512 bytes).
65536K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 512K).
Configuration register is 0x2102
==============================================================================
wish to Help ASAP
regards

hi ,
i did
the same issue ,
i did a TEST policymap that has 30 percent gurantee
but the same result!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the router god down agian !
here is logs :
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.605: Interface Virtual-Access1896 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.797: Interface Virtual-Access1317 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.809: Interface Virtual-Access993 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.817: Interface Virtual-Access1699 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.981: Interface Virtual-Access254 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.993: Interface Virtual-Access687 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.001: Interface Virtual-Access35 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.009: Interface Virtual-Access160 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.017: Interface Virtual-Access1337 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.029: Interface Virtual-Access1670 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.037: Interface Virtual-Access1948 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.049: Interface Virtual-Access1669 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.109: Interface Virtual-Access1334 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.117: Interface Virtual-Access151 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.125: Interface Virtual-Access761 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.137: Interface Virtual-Access810 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.197: Interface Virtual-Access1522 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.237: Interface Virtual-Access1692 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.257: Interface Virtual-Access368 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.305: Interface Virtual-Access1758 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.317: Interface Virtual-Access2061 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.325: Interface Virtual-Access1203 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.337: Interface Virtual-Access188 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.345: Interface Virtual-Access1975 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.357: Interface Virtual-Access1172 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.509: Interface Virtual-Access1647 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.517: Interface Virtual-Access458 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.609: Interface Virtual-Access608 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.621: Interface Virtual-Access2128 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.633: Interface Virtual-Access1167 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.641: Interface Virtual-Access487 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.653: Interface Virtual-Access1793 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.665: Interface Virtual-Access2280 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.769: Interface Virtual-Access839 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.781: Interface Virtual-Access2311 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.793: Interface Virtual-Access1788 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.857: Interface Virtual-Access8 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.869: Interface Virtual-Access2243 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.881: Interface Virtual-Access580 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.057: Interface Virtual-Access6 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.065: Interface Virtual-Access1331 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.077: Interface Virtual-Access1235 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.177: Interface Virtual-Access1748 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.189: Interface Virtual-Access2262 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.205: Interface Virtual-Access2136 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
i want to ask a question , could this be from IOS ????

I have asr 1000 with asr1000rp2-adventerprisek have problem when I gave PPP Multilink to the interface Dialer

Hello,
please Urgent Help
I have ASR 1000 with asr1000rp2-adventerprisek Version, when I give PPP Multilink to the dialer interface it show following error :
FMFP-3-OBJ_DWNLD_TO_CPP_FAILED: F0: fman_fp_image:
MLP bundle , link download to CPP failed
please urgent help

this error comes with the command PPP multilink, it is a lot of letters and numbers and then this last line comes this message
FMFP-3-OBJ_DWNLD_TO_CPP_FAILED: F0: fman_fp_image:
MLP bundle 181, link 178 download to CPP failed
the configuration still not installed but I configured just the following lines
interface Virtual-Template
ip unnumbered Loopback2
ip mtu 1440
ip load-sharing per-packet
ip tcp adjust-mss 1400
no logging event link-status
peer default ip address pool
ipv6 unnumbered Loopback2
ipv6 enable
no ipv6 nd suppress-ra
ppp authentication pap chap callin
ppp multilink
ppp multilink fragment delay 100
ppp multilink mrru local 1546
that were the lines used to configure this Dialer, the image must be asr1000rp2-adventerprisek and not Ipbase but I dont tried to use IPbase.
what do think ?

Interface virtual-template limitations

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for