Interpretation Algorithm in EBS

Hi All,
I need to create a customized interpretation algorithm for Electronic Bank Statement as standard interpretation algorithms are not suited our requiement. Please let me know how to achieve the same, as some user exit has to be found? I tried but i didnot found any user exit.
Regards
Srikanth

Please refer SAP
Note 494777 - Customer enhancements in electronic bank statement
Note 597428 - El.accnt statement: Customer-specific interpret.algorithms
549277 - FAQ: Electronic account statement
414233 - Accnt statement:customer-specific interpretation algorithms
Regards,
Ravi

Similar Messages

Customer specific Interpretation Algorithm in EBS

Hi All,
According to OSS Notes 597428 we need to copy the FM:FIEB_028_ALGORITHM as Z_FIEB_901_ALGORITHM. But same code will not serve my problem witout adding any required code.
Can any one help how to get the coding for interpreatation algorith for customer specific interpretation algorithm(901)?
Thanks in advance,
Uma

Hi Uma,
I believe they mean just to take the interface. Which practically means to copy in the first step. There is no standard source code for 901 yet I suppose. It is just the value range in a domain what we see in customizing.
I'm sitting with the same thing. I want to get this KIDNO-logic from Norway working for Germany. The main question for me just now is: do I have to stay in function group F030 to create Z_FIEB_028_ALGORITHM or do I have to create a new function group?
What do you mean?
regards
Heinrich

Have a problem in using Interpretation algorithm 15 in EBS configurations

Experts,
I have configured Interpretation algorithm 15 in EBS settings for my client. And in that process, the system picks the reference field data and updates the same in Assignment field. But the data which is getting updated in assignment field is only partial.
To be more exact, the system picks the data from Reference field from bank file and updates only 13 digits in assignment field. I also checked the data field of assignement allows upto 18 digits.
For example:
Reference field (bank file): 20000000002011
Updated assignment: 20000000002011 (only 13 digits)
We want to use this assingment field which has the combination of payment document no + year for clearing purposes.
Please advise...
Raman

hi Sudeep.
kindly look at this thread as reference ,inorder to get rid of your problem
aler&idocs
Regards
Saurabh Goel

EBS external transactions – Interpretation algorithms and processing types

When assigning external transactions I am unclear about how best to use the Interpretation Algorithm and Processing type fields. Does anyone have some practical examples to help me understand how to use these tools?

In the global configuration for EBS, you map external transactions to internal transactions (posting rules) within a transaction type. You then assign each bank key and bank account combination to the transaction type that should be used for processing statements for that account. If you want different external transaction mappings for different account IDs, then you need to create different transaction types and assign each account to the relevant transaction type. Since the transaction types are assigned to the account numbers, you can have different transaction types for accounts with the same bank key.
Regards,
Shannon

EBS Interpretation Algorithm 015 - FEBEP-CHECT has only 13 characters

We have customized SAP for uploading a MT940 and to automatically clear the customer with the ZUONR. We have
- assigned the external transaction to a posting rule with interpretation algorithm 015
- defined the search string and the search string use
We then found out that the string in the note to payee is 16 characters long, and the FEBEP-CHECT is only 13 characters.
Example : note to payee is
GIRO 9999999 A M ABCDE IDEAL BETALING 2110110214131970 1120000044826102 10-01-11 21*32 PREPAID BETALING
where 2110110214131970 is the BSEG-ZUONR.
In FEBA we see after uploading the MT940 with FF_5 only 0110214131970 as clearing reference.
We then implemented notes 396776 Account statement / MT940: Customer reference too long, but this only added a line to the note to payee : <REF>2110110214131970</REF>
We then implemented note 1409628 (although we are on 4.7) but this didn't clear the customer either.
We would appreciate any suggestions or comments.
Thanks,
M. vd Sap

We developed an algorithm 902 to take care of this issue.

Interpretation Algorithm in Electronic Bank Reco

Hello all
I am configuring the Electronic Bank Reco for Citibank. However, I am facing the following issue -
Interpretation algorithm - For the External Transaction, I have set the algorithm as 020 - Document No Search. However, the system by default is picking WRBTR as the clearing criteria. What could be wrong in this case?
Please guide me as to whether I am using the correct algorithm if the clearing criteria is the Payment Document No.
Thanks in advance
Hrishi

Try algorithm 120 instead of 020. I had a similar issue with algorithm 021 and was able to resolve it by switching to algorithm 121. Because of the similarities between 020 and 021 (020 is for document numbers, 021 is for reference docs), you may be able to resolve your issue by switching to algorithm 120.
Regards,
Shannon

Cheque Encashment Date through Interpretation algorithm 015

Hi,
I am using the Interpretation algorithm 015 for Bank Reconciliation.
When I run the Bank Reco, system is not updating the Cheque Encashment date in FCHN (Cheque Register).
I have checked for Rule 011 - 013, same is being updated.
But since I am using Rule 015, I need to update thru rule.
Could anyone suggest, what can I do in this case.
Regards,
Hitesh

Verifty there are no leading zero's in the cheque number. Also there are other threads that I have seen with similar issues using 011 and 013.
Regards
Waza

Interpretation Algorithms to be assinged for BANAMEX BTC Codes 646,936,937,938

Hello Friends -
I need to map some new BTC Codes in our BANAMEX Transaction type and created the Internal Posting rules.
Can you pls give me a little idea on how to decide which Interpretation Algorithms to be used for new BTC Code I need to assign.
Pls let me know If I should ask any information from Bank.
Thanks

Hello!
Can you please provide some list with short description of the BTC codes from your house bank?
Usually, BTC codes are different from bank to bank, therefore the first thing you've to do is to get the file from your house bank with the clear bank-specific format description, especially with the description of the field 86 and its structure, the range of its possible values etc.
So please, provide some explanation on these BTC codes.

Manual BRS Interpretation algorithm not picking the doc for clearing

While posting ff67 if i am using reference doc no or doc no, system giving the message values are ignored. I checked interpretation algorithm i gave 020,015.021 and posted one by one, but system asking only bank reference no not a doc no, if i am giving doc no, again them same error "Values are ignored". Please help me to solve why interpretation algorithm is not taking effect fully. this is not happen after running batch input i have match manually for clearing. Is it any way to solve my problem for clearing the doc automatically . Please help me.

Hi,
Please refer this forum:
How to clear Documents using XBLNR(Reference field) through Manual BRS-FF67
Regards,
Pramitha.

Algorithm for EBS

HI all,
We are using F110 and DMEE for payment file generation. For reverse file we are using EBS multicash format.
In F110 zp document is posted.
My confusion is, in EBS what posting rule should be used. and what algorithm should be adopted in configuration.
Please guide.
Thanks

Hi,
The accounting entry at the time of APP is as follows:
Debit: Vendor Account
Credit: Bank Outgoing Clearing Account
At the time of EBS posting, the entry will be as follows:
Debit: Bank Outgoing Clearing Account
Credit: Main Bank Account (House Bank)
You need to select the posting rule that gets the above entry at the time of EBS posting. I think there is no need to use any algorithm in the configuration for this transaction type.
Regards,
Kiron Kumar T.

INTERPRETED - NATIVE for eBS 12.1 on 11g DB

I'm converting my 11g database for my 12.1.3 eBS environment from standard INTERPRETED to NATIVE, but I'm facing the following problem:
The procedure (Metalink doc) runs fine, but initially he does not show the content of the plsql directory as a parameter (which may be OK on 11g),
but later on he does not create ANY file into this directory, even when the database says all needed database object types are now of type NATIVE. All objects are also still valid (meaning : no new invalid objects are seen)
I have an SR open for this same problem, no feedback yet
Can somebody give a clue here ? Is the conversion successful ?
Thanks,
Tony

The procedure (Metalink doc) runs fine, but initially he does not show the content of the plsql directory as a parameter (which may be OK on 11g),
Correct, in 11g plsql_native_library_dir and plsql_native_library_subdir_count have no effect and are are not needed -- Behavior Changes After Upgrading Oracle Database
Can somebody give a clue here ? Is the conversion successful ?
If no errors/warnings can be found in the database alert log file and the startup of the database is successful then your conversion is successful.
You may also refer to the following docs to verify.
FAQ and Known Issues with PLSQL Native Compilation. (Doc ID 734079.1)
Master Note for Native Compilation (Doc ID 1134594.1)
Thanks,
Hussein

In EBS document not get auto clear Algorithms 11

In Electronic bank statment document not get clear automatically while batch run.
I update check no to payment document. even though it is not get auto clear.
in OT51 assign Interpretation Algorithms 11 011:(Outgoing check: Check number not identical to document number)
why it is not get auto clear with check number.

011 = Outgoing check: Check number not identical to document number
012 = Outgoing check: Check number identical to document number
The "document number" in the descriptions is the payment document number - the FI doc that cleared the invoice. If you use the payment document number as the check number - and thus that is the number the bank includes in the bank statement - then you would use algorithm 012. If you create a check in the check register that is a different number than the payment document - and the check number is the number in the bank statement - then you would use algorithm 011.
Search SAP Help for a document titled "Interpretation Algorithms". This document includes descriptions of all the standard interpretation algorithms.
Regards,
Shannon

Bank Reconciliation(EBS)

Hi,
Created 2 vendor invices of 1000 + 2000
issued check for 3000 using bank clearing account -Outchecks. ( Dr vendor Cr Clearing-Outchecks account)
On receipt of the bank statemnet Clearing account
(Dr Clearing account Cr Bank account)
In Subledger I want to clear the open item of both 1000 and 2000.
As the amount is 3000 it ant clear as error message 'Diff is too large to clear'
How do I effectively clear the sub ledger items also ?
I tried Check no .
Any suggestions from whom worked on Bank statement?
Regards,
Chitra

Chitra,
You should have cleared your Vendor items while issuing the Check:
Vendor Acc:
-1000
-2000
Your Check issing should be:
Vendor +3000 (plus clear both invoices)
Check Clr -3000
When your EBS with that check arrives I assume it is available (Check#) as a Customer Reference field. You can use Check based clearing (interpretation algorithm) to actaully set your check to "Encashed" and directly clear your payment document item in Check Clr account.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Darek

EBS -note to payees

Hi can some body tell me how do we clear/post customer payment using EBS.
I am not sure about how do we search open items, note to payees field & defining variant for EBS.
Thanks
Nik

Hello Nik,
Please go through the below link to understand the basics of EBS and also the steps for configuring search for Document numbers in Note to Payee (usage of interpretation algorithm etc.,). Also, the step wise configuration, the overall behavior of EBS and the usage of EBS for Posting & Clearing is explained in detail.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/43/0bd87b43de11d1896f0000e8322d00/frameset.htm
Hope this info helps you in understanding the concept.
Lastly, please reward points.
With Regards
Vijay Gajavalli

EBS - Error F5 263 (Diff is too large for clearing)

Helli Experts,
We are implementing SAP Electronic bank statement functionality. One of the requirements of the business is that of automatic clearing of customer open items after import of MT940.
We are using standard interpretation algorithm 001, but made use of an enhancement to clear the open items based on age of the open items rather than any reference given in Note to Payee details. That means if a customer has 4 overdue open items and paid the amount referring to the 3rd open item, system should rather clear the 1st open item which is overdue for more number of days than the 3rd open item. This has been made possible by activating the check box "Distribute by age" in FEBCL table through the standard enhancement option given by SAP.
As an extension of this requirement, if the customer pays off in lumpsum (in single payment) for the combination of first three open items, then the system should clear off those three open items leaving the fourth one as the open item. For instance first open item has the amount of $ 1000, 2nd one has $2000, 3rd one has $3000 and 4th one has $4000. Now if the customer pays $6000, system should clear the 1st, 2nd and 3rd open items automatically after loading the bank statement containing this payment of $6000. So, only the 4th one will be in open item status.
But when I load the bank statement, system is giving me an error message F5 263 (the difference is too large for clearing) in posting area 2. Posting area 1 is fine and document is successfully posted. Issue is there only in posting area 2. I believe system should be able to find the first three open items for the amount of $6000 based on the indicator of "Distribute by age". But this is not happening. If I try to reprocess the statement through FEBAN after I got this error message, then system is able to find the first three open items and then able to clear off. But wondering why it is not happening in transaction FF.5 automatically.
So, could you kindly let me know if I am missing something or is it a limiation in SAP that this scenario is not possible to achieve through EBS.
Thanks in advance.
Sridhar

Hi Experts,
Using standard BAdI the requirements could be solved. Thanks.
Regards,
Sridhar

Interpretation Algorithm in EBS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for