Intrastat Report RVEXST00 & RMIMST00 not picking up 'I' Rate

Hi,
hope someone could share some insign on this intrastat 'I' rate, we have set-up the intsastat report in our development Box and currently performing some testing, we notice that when we select the intrastat rate from the selection screen the systems does not select the 'I' rate, instead its still selecting the 'E' rate. I am just wondering have anyone enconter the same issue which we are facing.
in the above example, we have maintain both rates, E rate which we use on a daily basis and also we have created 'I' rate for intrastat. When we execute the report we selected intrastat rate, however the outcome of the report shows the 'E' rate is used and not the 'I' rate.
Hope someone can share something.
Regards
Ken

Dear Sonni,
First of all are you sure that the exchange rates are coming correctly from Source to BW.
If not do the below mentioned procedure.
RSA1 --> goto source system --> right click on your source system --> select Transfer Exchange Rates --> select the mode of transfer and excute it
hope it will solve your problem.
With Regards
Arun
Edited by: Arun Aravapalli on Mar 17, 2010 1:08 AM

Similar Messages

Foreign Currency Payments are not Picking up Exchnage Rates

Hi,
We are on R12.0.6 and while entering foreign currency payments the system is not picking up the exchange rate. It is only allowing us to enter USER exchange rate. The field of exchange rate on Payment form is greyed out and not showing anything.
We have checked the rates and these are present in system. The same rates are picked up by invoice entry screens but for payments it gives us no exchange rate found.
Has anyone faced this problem.

Well, it seems that the "Exchange Rate" field on the Payment form populates when the user selects the Bank Account before the Payment Date field. Previously we were entering the information first in the Payment Date field and than selecting the Bank Account. This was preventing the Exchange Rate field from being populated with the rate.
I just changed the order of the entry and it worked perfectly. Now first we select the bank from which payment is going to take take place and than the date, and the exchange rate is automatically picked up from the rates table.

Report RHCDOC_DISPLAY not picking Appraisals ratings

Hi,
Standard report RHCDOC_DISPLAY is not picking Appraisal Ratings.
I have made changes in table T77CDOC_CUST by seeing few threads but am not getting ratings which client is asking for....
Config in T77CDOC_CUST:
Plan Version: 1
Object type: BA
Infotype: 0025
Subtype: *
Active: Checked-in
Please suggest.

Hi Sushil,
Sorry for late reply.
actually i was trying out your solution.
I have created a category and template also done related configuration in IMG, but problem am facing was am not able to rate the employee.
I mean ratings field in PA30 --> IT0025 is not allowing entries, where we enter rating like met some epectations, outstanding etc.
if that happens, i can rate an EE and test the report. and i hope that ur solution works.
Please let me know where have I gone wrong.
Thanks for kind response....
Regards,
Venkatesh
Edited by: VenkateshKalai on Nov 10, 2011 5:32 PM

Webi does not pick correct Data

Hi Guys,
I have a webi. The Universe for the Webi is based on Bex Query. I see correct Data in Bex Query but when I create a webi report it does not pick correct data.
I have checked following points already:-
1] No Resstriction at Query Level
2] No restriction at Universe Level
3] No Filters/ Restriction at Webi Level.
Can anyone suggest whats happening?
Regards

Hi Ray,
It happens sometimes that data gets aggregated over all the dimension objects present in the 'Available Objects' section in webi.
Try to pull only the characteristics present in the row section of the bex query say 'X' and measure in the column section of bex query say 'Y' into the results pane in the edit query window in webi.Then run the report and check.
This will give you the idea about aggregation.
Regards
Vineeta

Tax Rate is not picking in SD flow

Hi,
I have maintained the Tax code and Tax Jurisdiction Code in FTXP.But the system is not picking the Tax Rates in Sales Order
What could be the reason for this.Kindly help me in fix this issue. I am getting the below error while releasing the Billing document in VF02.
Why it is giving the below error even though i have maintained FTXP tax rates in with Tax code and Tax jurisdiction code
Tax code in procedure TAXUSJ is invalid
Message no. FICORE704
Diagnosis
The tax code entered is not defined in the country for this company code.
System response
Procedure
Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
Procedure for System Administration
If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system settings.
To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
1. Check whether the required tax determination procedure is assigned to the relevant country. the Procedure field is in the detail screen.
2. Create a new tax code if required.
Thanks
SAP GURU

ASSIGN TAX CODES FOR NON TAXABLE TRANSACTIONS
PATH: SPRO  FINANCIAL ACCTG  FINANCIAL ACCTG GLOBAL      SETTINGS  TAX ON SALES/PURCHASE  POSTING  ASSIGN      TAX CODES FOR NON TAXABLE TRANSACTIONS
TRANSACTION CODE     -     OBCL
SELECT POSITION BUTTON
GIVE YOUR COMPANY CODE          -     GES
PRESS ENTER
COMPANY CODE          -     GES
ASSIGN INPUT TAX      -     V0
     OUT PUT TAX     -     A0
 SAVE & SAVE IN YOUR REQUEST

Statistical Value in MEIS for INTRASTAT reporting

Hello,
From reveiwing related posts I understand that the statistical value on the INTRASTAT report comes from a system default exchange rate that uses the average exchange rate from the border crossing rate (GRWR condition on the PO) and the exchange rate on the invoice.
What is the exact calculation that is being used to determine the statistical value on the MEIS report?
Thanks,

Thanks very much for the link.
We do have the GRWR conditions set up, and the statistical value is populating correctly on the PO.
The issue I'm having is that I can't properly explain how the reported statistical value (VEIAV- GRENZEWEAK) is calculated.
For example:
VEIAV - GRENZWEAK is 5,405.86 SEK
GRWR on PO 572.03 EUR 5,299.22 SEK (Ex rate: 9.26389)Goods Receipt 504.79 EUR 4,681.78 SEK (Ex rate: 9.27470)
Freight 40.00 EUR 370.99 SEK (Ex rate: 9.27470)Invoice 503.00 EUR 4,770.43 SEK (Ex rate: 9.48395)
Do you know how SAP arrives at 5,405.86 SEK with these inputs?
Thanks,

Variation of payment term with po term.lastest rate is not picked up,*

Dear SAP
Variation of payment term with po term.lastest rate is not picked up,
Irregular rate is uploading on system.document attached
*Reagards
MERUGU HAREESH *

there are payment terms at comapny code level AND purchasing org level, because you may get vendors for which you dont need purchasing views, such as customs or restaurants, where you never place a purchase order at. And other vendors like goods suppliers may never need company code views because you will never pay them.
So each view serves its own purpose.
It is not possible to just ignore maintenance at one level and get the payment term for an other organisation.
Especially as you can have several purchasing organisations within one company (if you purchasing wants to differentiate purchases of direct material from MRO purchasing) or you have one purchasing org for several company codes.
And not always is the payment term equal then.
If you are certain that the company code payment term is always equal to purchasing org payment term, then copy it over with mass maintenance and everything is fine.

Intrastat report Spain. Credit memos posted not appearing in report

Hi
I have a issue where the debit notes raised to vendor are not appearing in Intrastat declaration.
How this debit and credit notes must be taken by Intrastat ? This problem is there since the Intrastat report is being used.
Is there any specific configuration for this or
is there any period check because of which the debit notes are not picked?
The reason is po was created in Feb 2009 and continuous GR and invoice postings happened in subsequent months which are all captured in Intrastat report. A debit note was raised in Sep 2009 which does not appear in the report.
Request your expertise and help to resolve this issue.
Thank you

credit memos are not supported in SAP as you can read in docu:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sbo2005ao/helpdata/en/F3/4392579F5DC24E9FBE2FA84E9E7660/frameset.htm
Please read the local Intrastat guide, in many countries it just says that you have to file a correction per paper form to your statiscal office.
SAP explains this as well in OSS note 374682:
If a credit memo refers to a billing document which was already declared to authorities, proceed as follows:Here, you should create a written correction to the statistical office.Specify a data record to which the credit memo refers.
Check the documents of the statistical offices for information on when you have to declare the credit memo (limits for values and quantities).*********************************************************************

Intrastat reporting- Incorrect PO picked

Hi Gurus,
I need to find out why and how a particular PO is being picked by the MEIS report? I was always in the belief that once the import procedure is maintained at the PO item level, if any GR/ IR takes place, then these would be reported. But I am not able to understand, while even after removing the import data in a PO, it is being picked. Pls could you throw some light on this. Your timely help would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Madan

How could you delete the import data?
You probably deleted a value in the import data of the PO. But this does not make the import data going away.
First of all you define in customizing when the import screens are coming up.
Usually when you and your vendor belong both to a different country in the EU.
Then, the PO is subject for Intrastat reporting.
But reported are only x-border movements.
The PO is not picked if the movement (good receipt has not yet been posted.
But once you have a movement, then it depends further if the invoice receipt happened in the same month .
If yes then the movement is selected for the report.
If not, dependend on local country laws, the movement is either valuated with PO price, or not reported in this month. Then it will be reported in next month, either with the invoice value (if the Invoice wil be received in the meantime) or with PO price if the inovice is still not received.
Why would you like to exclude this PO and its movements from Intrastat? Why dont you exclude the PO number directly from the selection screen in MEIS?

Report not picking value for segment reporting

Hello,
The PA report is not picking up the carry forward value. I have checked the following.
1)in FS10N balance carry fwd has been done.
2)2keh Profit center carry fwd actual balance has been performed
3)KE5Z Chk a/c wise transaction, it is showing that PA documents exist
The program was developend last year December and it had picked the correct value for the same (cumulative value).
Kindly let me know what could be the possible reason. Any pointer for the same will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
Jyoti

self answerd

Change log report S_AHR_61016380 not picking IT0025

Hi Experts,
I need the change log report to capture the details of changes made in IT0025 (Appraisals).
I have made necessary configurations to the below tables by watching in other SDN threads, but still my problem is not solved.
Also made changes to master data (IT0025) and tested, but still no use.
Log report is not picking changes made to IT0025.
Please suggest
Thanks
Venkatesh

Dear Expert,
for logged changes in infotype report we need to install crystal report.
please suggest.

Report not picking the template

Hi all,
I built and registered a rtf template to an Oracle Report(print purchase orders), which is typically run
while approving a PO by selecting the check box (PRINT) in the Approve Documents Form. But Its not picking the
template instead it prints the XML Data. Do I need to call the template through the report trigger.
In other words, How to apply rtf template for the cocurrent report w/ short name, POXPPO? Please Help.
Thanks,
kalyan.
Edited by: kwin on May 21, 2010 6:22 AM

Hi
We had similar issue while submitting BI Publisher report from Shipping transaction form though report is associated with template and data defintion.
To fix we need to another setup through responsibility System Administration > Concurrent Programs > Define query for concurrent program choose update and go to onsite setting tab, In template choose template in LOV after it worked with out any issues. Try similary for this issue it might work. If this doesn't work create forms personalization on approving PO call that step where you can call plsql program, in plsql program you can call template use standard API's before submitting concurrent program
Let me know if this as worked
Thanks
Kamalakar.G

'Move order pick slip report' Report not picking XML publisher Template.

Hi,
SUB: i have to create one XML report on .RDF(move order pick slip report).
Submitting procedure move order pick slip report : i have created one Discrete Job and released that Job, then Component pick release for that particular job. then move order number will generates. then automatically fires the 'Move Order Pick Slip' Report.
NOTE: what i meant to say is i am not submitting the report from SRS window. it will fires automatically when Component pick release.
For this i have taken .xml and generated .rtf according to my layout and i have registered with XML publisher also.it is correct . But while running the report i am geting output as XML codes not in template(wht i have .rtf) format.
if i have to see the output in template from. (i have taken in conc program output as XML also) still same problem.
please help me if anybody having solutions.
Thanks
Valli

Hi Valli,
1:The first thing i would suggest that please check the BI Publisher version you are using (on apps/and on template builder also).
2: In any case if your report is not picking up the template and generating the xml output , i suggest you to attach one program "XML Report Publisher" in your SRS.
Oncwe you run your report and its generate the xml output. you have to take the request id & from view ---> submit request--->XML Report Publisher. run this request again.
it will ask for the request id , select the appropriate request id and it will generate the pdf output as per your requirement.
But this is temporary solution , i strongly recommend you to check the updated version of BI Publisher and instaal it on your oracle apps instance. also use the updated version of bi publisher for Layout(Template Builder).
Regards
SRatnesh

Liquidity Report not picking up Noted item and Sales orders

Hi Experts,
I created planning levels from source as PSK, yet the liquidity is not picking up these items from sales orders and purchase orders. Also while creating noted items, i have given planning levels in the configurarion and the same is not picking up in the liquidity too
Please advice
Thanks in Advance

Hi Hien,
We have created planning levels separately for MM and SD and we have created under SDF and MMF respectively.
IT is working for group created for direct FI entrly and linked the same with PSK and the same is working fine.
I am new to FSCM. Can you please elaborate FDFD?
Thanks and Regards

PO Creation of free goods for intrastat reporting

All,
Due to intrastat reporting restrictions, when we are creating a PO with a free good we need to mark the item as "Free Good" on the item overview, and set the "Business Transaction type" to 41 on the "Origin / Destination / Business" tab of the "Import" tab.
However, we also need to set the "Statistical value" on the "Decleration Values" tab but this field is greyed out.
The help message says:
The system determines statistical values on the basis of condition records with condition types GRWR and GWLB (subcontracting).
However it does not say where I can set this value. Does anyone know where I can set this value per material?
Many Thanks,
Colm

Can you explain why subcontracting is free of charge, I have never seen somebody doing some work without charging for it.
are you talking about the delivery of the materials sent to your subcontractor or the finished materials that you get back?
Usually the statistical value field can be maintained in VEFU. But I guess it interacts with the free of charge indicator in your case.
I just like to give you some explanation from the statistical office:
u201CProcessing under contractu201D covers operations (treatment/processing, mounting, assembly, enhancement,
renovation, etc.) resulting in the production of new or really improved goods on the basis of intermediate
materials provided free of charge by the commissioning party. Depending on whether processing under
contract is done within the country or abroad, the relevant terms used are u201Cinwardu201D and u201Coutwardu201D
processing under contract.
u201CProcessing under contractu201C in the context of intra-Community trade statistics covers intra-Community
cross-border movements of goods, provided the finished products produced on the basis of the
intermediate products provided through cross-border transactions will later leave the country of
manufacture (dispatch), being either returned to the original country of consignment (arrival; nature of
transaction u201C41u201C or u201C51u201C) or moved to another country (nature of transaction u201C42u201D or u201C52u201C).
What must be declared is both the cross-border movement of the (free) intermediate materials and the
subsequent (cross-border) return of the finished products.
(Note: Processing performed by the processor on own account is not processing under contract but is
generally covered as purchase/sale (nature of transaction u201C11u201D.)
For the declaration of the intermediate products provided free of charge (nature of transaction u201C41u201D), a
statistical value has to be indicated that corresponds to a selling price customary in the market (free
German border); in case of doubt a careful estimate should be used. When declaring the finished products
(nature of transaction u201C51u201D), the invoiced amount to be indicated is the costs of wage, material, transport
and insurance as invoiced by the contractor; for the statistical value, the statistical value of the
intermediate materials (provided free of charge) must be included, too.
(Note: Intermediate products returned to the commissioning party without treatment should be declared
under nature of transaction u201C51u201D, entering the value originally indicated.)
If, however, the commissioning party provides only parts that are insignificant in terms of function or value
(e.g. labels, screws, etc.), then there is no processing under contract. In those cases, such provision of
materials that is negligible in statistical terms is exempted from declaration for intra-Community trade
statistics. For the finished product supplied on a cross-border basis, a sale or purchase (nature of
transaction u201C11u201D) is regularly assumed, with the value of the materials provided free of charge by the
commissioning party exceptionally not being included when determining the value of the finished
products.
Also, there is no processing under contract if the contract work performed at the goods provided consists
of just simple activities (e.g. simple packaging, ironing, etc.). In such cases the goods exported or
imported temporarily within that scope are not covered statistically.
Examples:
1. A sports car is moved temporarily from Italy to Germany for tuning activities (e.g. power increase,
car body modifications). What is invoiced in addition to the labour costs is some car parts
purchased by the domestic contractor.
As the sports car is u201Creally improvedu201D by the work performed, this is u201Cprocessing under contractu201D,
which has to be declared under nature of transaction u201C41u201D for arrival and u201C51u201D for (re)dispatch.
2. For the production of a car in the Czech Republic, the engine gearbox unit and some other parts are
provided free of charge by the commissioning party located in Germany. For the import of the
complete car to Germany, the foreign producer invoices the car without the value of the engine
gearbox unit.
This is u201Cprocessingu201D of important components (both in terms of value and function) in connection
with the production of a u201Cnew goodu201D (car), i.e. the transaction u2013 by definition u2013 must be declared as
u201Cprocessing under contractu201D both for dispatch and for re-arrival.
3. For the production of an off-road vehicle produced in Austria, the German commissioning party
provides the company emblem free of charge. When the complete vehicle is imported to Germany,
the foreign producer of the off-road vehicle invoices the vehicle without the value of the company
emblem mounted on the vehicle.
Although the components provided are u201Cprocessedu201D, they are insignificant parts (company
emblem) both in terms of function and value, so that this is not u201Cprocessing under contractu201D but a
purchase (nature of transaction u201C11u201D) of a vehicle.
4. An older car is temporarily moved to Poland to restore the paint (washing, polishing and
conserving).
This is not u201Cprocessing under contractu201D in the context of intra-Community trade statistics because
the work performed consists of just simple activities. As this is u201Ctemporary useu201D, the cross-border
movement of the vehicle is exempted from declaration.

Intrastat Report RVEXST00 & RMIMST00 not picking up 'I' Rate

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for