Intresting Suggestions to improve the Time of replies

Hi All,
Before starting I like to add there is no intresting just to get attention that is added
Ok coming to point
I thought of suggesting to add simple funcitionality which will increase the ratio of replies.
1) When I see a list of threads in ABAP forum ...I open a thread which is intresting to me.
when I click that thread ..I can see the answers below that eX: almost 10 replies...I would like to add my answer too...
So again I NEED TO click reply button and then only the editor will come....
when I open thread on the down Why dont we added a editor thread there???
I t will defintely decrease time , increase replies tooo....
Regards
Sas

>
Thomas Zloch wrote:
> > when I open thread on the down Why dont we added a editor thread there???
> > I t will defintely decrease time , increase replies tooo....
>
> I'm not sure, wouldn't this inscrease the "asdf" type replies as well? If somebody wants to reply seriously with a non-redundant, non-copy/pasted, non-SMS-speak, non-single-link message, I think he/she would go the extra mile and click that button anyway. Also, you can reply to any particular message in the thread (important for quoting), how would the system know which one you are replying to with a single box at the bottom?
>
> Where is 2) ?
>
> Thomas
I am sorry 2) I thought but I forgotten now what it is seriously
ok coming to point I heard now a days moderators are having no much Job So this way we can create new Job...:)
Main point is now a days every one is too busy involved in trhier projects to reply sincerly..Although they are experts .
>Also, you can reply to any particular message in the thread (important for quoting),
Its easy if you have technology provide check box to that so people know which one you are replying...Or else...
Mention name its more easy to say .....
You see you people are working in a high speed net ..where each page will come as flash ...I dont think every one has the same speed of net...
Some times it will take few minutes for me to load each page.....So I although people like to reply they will feel lazy to answer those...
> Moderators work too, users headache too ,
>if the replies increases in ABAP like (subject) forums then the PS is Confused to choose the answer from more replies
Surprise...I never know that people expect less replies Lol!!
Moderators can also delete if some one doing too headache to them
>If so, this is so dangerous due to the fact that, you can change others' comments also which should not be the case.
This is not clear I dont understand why you said change others commetns ..If you are replying ...still you dont see the active of them
Ok all of you I want to give live example:
http://www.indiamike.com/india/indian-railways-f10/post-your-waitlist-will-it-get-confirmed-queries-here-only-t91500/194/
Check this website...THis is exactly what I am saying....
Regards
Sas

Similar Messages

Need suggestions on improving the performance end to end

I referred following links and as many as 25 previous posts before posting this question.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10b54994-f569-2a10-ad8f-cf5c68a9447c
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/402fae48-0601-0010-3088-85c46a236f50
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e0068bc1-6f8c-2a10-52bb-c6ee3562feb2
/people/boris.zarske/blog/2007/06/13/sizing-a-system-for-the-system-landscape-directory-of-sap-netweaver
I have some queries related to improving the performance of a scenario in my landscape.
Scenario : IDOC-SOAP (Synchronous with BPM)
The mapping is simple with 3 fld direct mapping.
Works grt with no problem in normal cases for one message transfer.
But initial load ( when we put it in new system, the scenario generates erros if we send more than 23 IDOCs at a time)
I have decided to perform the following to solve it.
/people/william.li/blog/2008/03/07/step-by-step-guide-in-processing-high-volume-messages-using-pi-71s-message-packaging
Will it help me because its a IDOC sync scenario.
What can I do to improve the performance of this scenario?
Please suggest me good suggestions to improve the performance
Please do list me out points that I have to perform (for a sync scenario with BPM) as I am already confused watching lots of blogs posts.
Nikhil.

do you think that the performance tuning that I mentioned in the link will hold good with sync scenarios?
i dont think so.....in this scenario the async mesg processing is made to wait
from the blog:
As you can see, for the 1st minute, all the messages are waiting to be processed. After 60 seconds,
the packages will be created and processed. There is no change to the monitoring of each of the
individual messages in SXI_MONITOR.
....but if you make a sync scenario wait....then probably you may run into the risk of blocking the Queues.......
If this is going to be in production then i would have been more careful...becoz firstly it is BPM....then synchronous BPM.....then a processing wait......normally do not try to make the BPM processing wait...my small suggestion

Does anyone have any suggestions to improve the performance to improve Firefox for andoid (more details).

I'm using it on a Samsung Captivate SGHi-897 with Jellybean 2.2 (I'm unable to upgrade the OS @this time). Firefox was recommended by a freind, however, so far I've been very disappointed with it, as, it is extremely slow and constanly crashes. I've tried all of the suggestions provided, but there is no improvememt. I realize it may be not all that compatible with this properly working device or OS. I have Samsung Galxaxy SGHi-727 Skyrocket with IC 4.1, however, I've been waiting for a part for it coming from Aisa, which seems to be taking forever, so in the meantime I'm.stuck with this. I was wondering if you may have any suggestions on how to speed it up and prevent it from crashing so much, other than what's on your help guide since those changes I've tried make no improvement in it's performance. I would very much prefer to use Firefox on this device, as well as, after I repair my other device for a number of other reasons, but if I'm unable to improve it, I'll just go back to what I was using. Thank you and be well.
twich83115
[ed. removed email]

Suggestion for improvement:
I'd like <select size="1" multiple> to provide a dropdown with checkboxes like this:
http://demos.telerik.com/aspnet-ajax/combobox/examples/functionality/checkboxes/defaultcs.aspx
Can that be done?
Thanks

Need suggestion to improve the performence of the report execution

Hi all,
I have to improve the performence of the report . I am executing the report in foreground. First time it is giving after running 6 mins . If i execute again It is giving the output.
I am using innner join between EKKO and EKPO. When I see the report in debugging, this is the select talking long time to execute then it is giving dump.
what all the things i need to take care .
Please suggest any advicess to over the issue.
Thanks,
Ajay

in sap tip-tricks:
Nested Select statements
Runtime: 4,641 microseconds
SELECT * FROM SPFLI INTO SPFLI_WA.
SELECT * FROM SFLIGHT INTO SFLIGHT_WA
      WHERE CARRID = SPFLI_WA-CARRID
        AND CONNID = SPFLI_WA-CONNID.
ENDSELECT.
ENDSELECT.
Select with join
Runtime: 5,080 microseconds
SELECT * INTO WA
    FROM SPFLI AS P INNER JOIN SFLIGHT AS F
      ON P~CARRID = F~CARRID AND
         P~CONNID = F~CONNID.
ENDSELECT

Suggestions to improve the performance to update sales order

Hi all,
Iam uploading the data from a local file to update the sales order by changing the partner function
and iam using 'BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE' for updating and it is taking much time to update the
sales order can any one suggest how to improve the performance to update salesorder with new partner function ?
Thanks & Best Regards,
Vishnu.

Make an SE30 on your program.
Check the action that cost too much time.
The result could be --> The update (maybe make only one commit at the end, instead of one commit by BAPI call).
A selection --> Maybe change the selection to use an index.

How Can I improve the time it takes to start PSE 9's Back up?

PSE's backup to external HDD has always seemed to be clunky.
For example, when the process starts and you are taken step-by-step through browsing for your HDD and then creating your next incremental backup file and then browsing again to your last backup file, I have gotten used to this taking ages. e.g. often up to 45 minutes.
Because of this, I ignore the fact that the application shows no user sign of carrying out the task, but looks like the application has hung. (just the windows blue circle revolving!). Indeed, if I mouse click on the button again (or anywhere else on the open PSE Organizer window), then Windows provides the message that Elements is not responding. However, if I wait, and wait eventually the next stage kicks in. Tonight, I started this process and it took 2.5 hours to reach the point that Elements would start the backup. It then took only just over 5 minutes to complete the backup!!
I am probably at least part of the cause of this problem. My Catalogue has 38,103 images in it (+ 1, 804 items not shown) - What are these and are they additional to the 38, 103?
Can I do something to improve the process of backing up?
I really like PSE and its organizer and this catalogue enables me to find any image very, very quickly which, for my work, is brilliant and incredibly useful and impressive. This catalogue has been in existence for a number of years now back from PSE 6 through, 7, 8 and now, PSE 9, since last September. Maybe this is part of the problem?
When I upgraded to PSE 9, I did restart the back up process with a full backup. I am now up to incremental backup 5. My images are spread out on my PC's HDD (2.95 gb on the internal partitioned drive C with 60.2 gb on its other partition D). The remainder 144 gb is on an external HDD.
Whilst PSE finds any image quickly, as already stated, it IS getting very slow at generating the thumbnails when new images are downloaded into PSE.
Are there any steps that I can take to refresh PSE to speed up the backuyp process and generating the thumbnails?
Thanks for reading and considering all the above.
Elemt

function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}elemt wrote:
Arising out of our discussion yesterday and my stated intention to replace the current internal HDD with one that has a significantly larger capacity, I wonder if you, Ken, or dj_paige, or both, have any suggestions as to if I should keep my copy of PSE 9 activated when I make a mirror copy of the existing internal HDD or deactivate it before I make the mirror copy?
Since installing PSE fresh is relatively quick and painless, I wouldn't bother with keeping it in a mirrored copy. I don't know if activation is based on an ID derived from the hard drive or not, but based on my conversations with Adobe when I replaced mine I think it is (at least in part). The bottom line is that you'll need to deactivate your old copy before running the new copy (and activating that new copy), so to be on the safe side, I'd
Deactivate the old copy of PSE.
Uninstall that old copy.
Get your new primary hard drive set up.
Install PSE.
Activate PSE.
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}elemt wrote:
Then, I would copy across from the temporary external HDD, the 60.2 gb of images previously stored on the old E partition.
From both your comments, I am thinking that this might well screw up the database and PSE Organizer would be thrown by this. (maybe I could reconnect manually, but even if I could, that would be a massive task). It would probably mean my back up of my catalog that I made yesterday, unusable?
It might screw things up. I've never used the catalog Backup/Restore, so I'll defer to others who have, but I do know that Organizer's database (the catalog) stores a unique serial number ID for each volume that's used (C:, D:, etc.). I suspect that that serial number is derived from the serial number of the unit, but I could be wrong. I don't know how the database handles the situation where, e.g., photos on a Hitachi drive E: are then transferred to a Western Digital drive E:. It probably will involve "re-connecting" all the photos, but this is just speculation on my part.
I suggest you ignore, for the moment, PSE and set up your new hard drives in the way that makes the most sense to you. Then work in PSE to accommodate that setup.
Ken

Day 3 - A Suggestion for Improving the Ease of Use...

OK, It's day 3 and I'm beginning to appreciate the advantages of the new forum. Overall, I have to sa that I like it a lot.
However (there's often a 'however') the information columns to the right of the 'Subject' are counterintuitive and confusing. I'd like to suggest reorganising them.
They would be much more useful and informative (as well as being easier and more logical to read and interpret) if the columns were laid out in the following order:
Subject Latest Post New (Replies) Replies Author Ratings
The reasoning behind this is as follows. After knowing what the subject is (and thus whether you are interested or could help) and whether the question is answered or not, its then useful to know who last contributed and when, then whether there have been any new replies since you last looked at the thread. The total number of replies and ratings are very much secondary issues. To that end, the layout of the old forum threads were much, much better.
What do others think?
"To forbid us anything is to make us have a mind for it."
-- Michel de Montaigne, Essays, 1559

Could I offer a quick suggestion.
Make the 'solved' button clearly visible rather than in the options menu.
Maybe create a little icon asking if your question has been answered.
Some threads are answered but appear not to be. (Thread creator has replied but may not know where it is).
-+-No longer a forum member-+-

Suggestions to improve the INSERT performance

Hi All,
I have a table which has 170 columns .
I am inserting huge data 50K and more records into this table.
my insert would be look like this.
INSERT INTO /*+ append */ REPORT_DATA(COL1,COL2,COL3,COL4,COL5,COL6)
SELECT DATA1,DATA2,DATA3,DATA4,DATA5,DATA5 FROM TXN_DETAILS
WHERE COL1='CA';
Here i want to insert values for only few columns.Hence i specifies only those column names in insert statement.
But when huge data(50k+) returned by select query then this statement taking very long time to execute(approximately 10 to 15 mins).
Please suggest me to improve this insert statement performance.I am also using 'append' hint.
Thanks in advance.

a - Disable/drop indexes and constraints - It's far faster to rebuild indexes after the data load, all at-once. Also indexes will rebuild cleaner, and with less I/O if they reside in a tablespace with a large block size.
b - Manage segment header contention for parallel inserts - Make sure to define multiple freelist (or freelist groups) to remove contention for the table header. Multiple freelists add additional segment header blocks, removing the bottleneck. You can also use Automatic Segment Space Managementhttp://www.dba-oracle.com/art_dbazine_ts_mgt.htm (bitmap freelists) to support parallel DML, but ASSM has some limitations
c - Parallelize the load - You can invoke parallel DML (i.e. using the PARALLEL and APPEND hint) to have multiple inserts into the same table. For this INSERT optimization, make sure to define multiple freelists and use the SQL "APPEND" option. If you submit parallel jobs to insert against the table at the same time, using the APPEND hint may cause serialization, removing the benefit of parallel jobstreams.
d - APPEND into tables - By using the APPEND hint, you ensure that Oracle always grabs "fresh" data blocks by raising the high-water-mark for the table. If you are doing parallel insert DML, the Append mode is the default and you don't need to specify an APPEND hint. Also, if you're going w/ APPEND, consider putting the table into NOLOGGING mode, which will allow Oracle to avoid almost all redo logging."
insert /*+ append */ into customer values ('hello',';there');
e - Use a large blocksize - By defining large (i.e. 32k) blocksizes for the target table, you reduce I/O because more rows fit onto a block before a "block full" condition (as set by PCTFREE) unlinks the block from the freelist.
f - Use NOLOGGING
f - RAM disk - You can use high-speed solid state disk (RAM-SAN) to make Oracle inserts run up to 300x faster than platter disk.

Moving toward a click-less OS: a suggestion for improving the Mac interface

This is a long post, so if you have a short attention span, or are not interested in UI design, have a nice day and move on to the next post!
A little history first. Back in the days of OS 7 and earlier, I recall a feature lacking from the OS that was really important. For a long time, Apple did not use sticky menus, and you had to use a third-party extension to have the ability to click once on a menu heading and have the pop down menu display and stay there without having to hold the mouse down. Around OS 8 or so I recall that they made sticky menus part of the OS and all applications, and that was a welcome ergonomic improvement. No need to click and hold when we explore menus. What I plan to talk about in this post is a similar improvement -- one designed to facilitate the easy exploration of files and folders while completely eliminating the need to click at all.
My idea was inspired by another feature of OS 8 (or thereabouts). This was the ability to display the files in a folder as buttons. This allowed the user to launch the application/file with a single click, rather than the ergonomically bad double-click required in previous OS's. (You could still select a file without launching it by clicking the label rather than the icon.) This very useful feature went away in OS X. So one is back to double clicking to launch all documents, photos, movies, or whatever. If you are editing hundreds of pictures in a folder as I am, and double clicking them to launch PREVIEW for a quick inspection, you start to develop problems with the tendons in the wrist. I have to switch hands regularly to deal with the fatigue.
The elimination of buttons was a huge step backward for me in OS X. It is simply not acceptable to have to double click files to launch them. I think a future OS -- truly improved, not just one with more flash -- must solve this problem. As I thought about how it should be implemented, I realized there is a much better and more general solution than that offered by buttons. One that allows the examination of files without ever clicking at all.
Imagine a folder with multiple file types: photos, mp3's, movies, text edit files, etc, and assume the files are displayed as icons (although my suggestion would work with list view as well). You see a jpg thumbnails and want to see some of them at full size. Or you see a song and want to hear it, or a movie and want to view it. Now imagine that there is a special "preview" mode which allows you to easily and quickly examine the contents of the files without having to launch them in an application by double clicking, then close the window with another click, go on to the next icon of interest, and do this again, and again, and again until your hand is ready to fall off. Instead, you toggle an assigned key (say F5), or select an appropriate menu choice in the Finder, in order to activate what I shall call dynamic preview mode (DPM). With DPM, whenever you move the cursor over a file icon you get a preview. For example, moving the cursor over a jpg file would immediately expand it to full size on the screen. The image would stay up for as long as the cursor remained over the file's icon (which may not be visible). Moving the cursor off the icon causes the preview image to "collapse" back into the file icon. Moving the cursor over another jpg would cause its image to expand to full size until you moved on to the next, and so on. Note that you are able to view ALL of the jpg images without ever clicking the mouse once, well enough twice. There isn't any way I can think of to make reviewing large numbers of images easier. All you have to do is move the mouse around and the images appear and disappear dynamically, without you doing anything other than moving the mouse. Since you would have to do that anyway to select a file for launching under OS X, DPM brings the effort down to the bare bones minimum (short of using a slide show -- but that has other problems, which is why I don't use it except at the end for the fully edited pics). Think of DPM as a super convenient way to browse images without launching applications, closing windows, double-clicking, and so on. When you find an image that you might want to do something with, say edit the color balance in Photoshop, you then launch it using the appropriate application.
Of course, applications are indeed launched during DPM. But not in the usual way. No doubt the Preview app would be used to handle the display of the jpg's in DPM but it would be modified somewhat for dynamically viewing images. When the cursor goes over a jpg, Preview opens it and displays it, but not in the usual window with a close box, but just as a simple untitled pane showing the image. And as soon as the cursor moves the pane disappears. Likewise, there is no Preview menu bar showing at the top of the screen, because Preview is only used for dynamic display, not editing of the jpg. Now, the user might want to launch the parent application when placing the cursor over the icon because they want to use the application to do something with it (besides viewing or listening). No problem. We simply design DPM so that when the option key is pressed while the cursor is moved over a file icon, it fully launches the application with the file, just as it now does when you double click the file icon. You get the usual titled window, application menu bar, etc. But note that you get the application running with the file loaded without having to double click. This click-less OS interaction, of course, could be implemented right now since it is a only a minor tweak on the OS.
What about other file types? Putting the cursor over an mp3 file (or other supported format) would start playing the song, and putting the cursor over a movie file would start playing the movie, again in an untitled pane. Presumably Quicktime would be used to handle both of these latter two tasks, but without launching in the usual way and taking over the menu bar. Putting the cursor over a text or RTF file would display it in a pane (possibly using Text Edit). More complicated file types (word processor, spreadsheet, statistical, etc.) would probably not be supported in a first-generation DPM. But jpg, mp3, mov, txt, and rtf files could be easily handled using just three applications that come with every Mac. Also, "compressed" stickie notes could now be deposited individually anywhere, in any folder or on the desktop, and putting the cursor over the note would expand it to full view. With the current OS, we need to run the stickies app which displays ALL the sticky notes at once, and which constrains them to the desktop only, both of which are serious limitations.
Of course, once we have DPM users will want to complicate things -- they always do. For example, they'll want the mp3 preview to have a play bar with a bug to position in the song, volume control, etc, just like the Quicktime player. But be careful what you ask for, or we are right back with full fledged apps loading with a menu bar and a window that has to be closed, and that defeats the point of a click-less preview. This is because any interaction the user might wish to have with the viewer or player will require moving the cursor, and in DPM that would normally cause the preview to cease. That's the point, after all. So I would argue that dynamic preview should be kept very simple: cursor on the icon opens a preview, cursor off the icon closes the preview.
Would this be enormously difficult to do? No. It is already being done -- kind of. For any of the file types discussed above, you can click on the file icon, then press command-I (Get Info), and you will see a preview at the bottom of the info box. If it is a pic, that's all you get. If a song or movie, you can play it. Unfortunately, if it is an rtf file, no preview is displayed -- kind of odd, that. (How hard is it to display some text?) The only thing not offered in the command-I previews for pics and movies is a full (or at least larger) screen preview. But that shouldn't be too difficult since Preview and Quicktime allow that as a matter of course.
Oh yeah. We can add folder icons to the list of icons supported by DPM. Right now, if I want to quickly peek at some folders just to see what they contain, I have to double-click each one to open it, and then click on the close box to close it again. With dynamic preview activated, all I would do is move the cursor over the folder icon and it would immediately expand to its usual size showing whatever contents can be seen in that view. Moving the cursor would make the folder collapse again. Again, all that is need to examine the contents of folders would be to move the cursor around. That's it.
(Don't get greedy -- you might want a scroll bar for the folder preview, but that defeats the point of a quick preview and would require cursor movement which, with DPM, would close the folder preview. Again, holding the option key down while placing the cursor over the folder icon could open the folder in the usual way, without needing to double click. But as with option-launched previews for images and the like, you will have to close the preview window yourself.)
Now, I do not think think dynamic preview should be activated out of the box, at least not at this point. Inexperienced users will be confused to see things popping up on the screen when they are moving the cursor around (or hearing songs). But for experienced users who have thousands of files archived in dozens of folders who need to quickly and easily examine them without the steps required now -- double-click, look or listen, close -- this would be a real improvement in the UI, one that would really make a difference. One, that once a user tried it (just like the first Mac OS) would make them say "I'll never go back!"
In closing, I must post a question, or fear being chastised for not following discussion group rules. So, what are the technical obstacles to doing what I am suggesting, and who else would like to see it done? (And, yes, I am sending these suggestions to Apple, so no need to tell me that.)
Drake

BDAqua wrote:
I agree with you totally... except the clickless preview though, since Apple doesn't like to give you options to turn stuff off or not use it at all if they go to the trouble of putting it in the OS!
Well, they give you the option to display the contents of a folder in list, icon, or column view. So why can't you have the option to view files with and without dynamic previewing? It is the dynamic equivalent (off vs on) of the static options provided by list, icon, and column view. Also, by the logic you give above (for Apple), one should not have preferences, because that makes the functioning of the OS or app different from one user to the next. And as a counter example, the features of the OS for people with disabilities are great to have, but they are not active just because they are there. One has to want to use them...
And if you think about it, Expose is an optional utility, as is Dashboard. Some people use them, some don't. DPM would be the same.
Every new OS release makes me spend a lot of time learning how to shut off/disable things like Spotlight, Dashboard, Time Machine, Transparent Dock & Menubar, ad infinitum!
Me too. Although I have learned to like Spotlight (although it has bugs), and the dock.
Did I ever tell you Leopard's System Preferences icon in the Dock looks like a Skull & Crossbones to me?
If you close one eye & squint the other one until it does to you, then you'll get an idea what OSX looks like to me... LOL.
I tried, but couldn't conjure it up! I must have too limited an imagination.
BTW, Are you aware you can select as many things to view at once as you want & drag them to say Preview's icon?
Sure. Have you ever selected several hundred pics and launched preview? Ca-chunk, ca-chunk, ca-chunk, wheez! It is quicker and less demanding of system resources to view one jpg at a time, unless you want to compare them in some way or do a slide show. But for just exploring the files, I want to do it one at a time, especially if iTunes is playing in the background, Photoshop is running and waiting to load a pic that I might decide to edit, mail is up to let me know if anyone is trying to reach me (ding!), Safari is running so I can follow Apple Discussions, etc. In other words, a lot is going on. No need to make matters worse by loading a bunch of pics into Preview, when I am happy to view them singly. This is why I object to the Cover Flow aspect of Quick Look and Safari 4.0. It is just another way to dog down limited system resources.

Suggestion for improving the iTunes Store

I just wanted to put forward a suggestion.
It would be really useful if when buying products off the iTunes Store you could tick a box to indicate whether. . .
a) you have watched the films/podcasts and...
b) whether you already own the product (much like the way you can do this with books on amazon)
This way you could have it make suggestions not including things you already own. I am finding particularly with the film store, I am enjoying one film and all of the recommended ones I have already either seen or already own.

You can send feedback/feature requests directly to Apple at this link: Apple Product Feedback

A suggestion to improve the quality of released WHQL Drivers (Admins please re

Hi Cat and other admins, top day to you!
I have a suggestion, or rather proposition that Im sure allot of folks here will agree with. <IMG height=6 src="http://forums.creative.com/i/smilies/6x6_smiley-happy.gif" width=6 border=0>
How about instead of the preview site http://preview.creativelabs.com being used exclusi'vely for releasing beta 64Bit drivers for public testing (which next to nobody uses). How about you (Creative) extend public beta testing to 32Bit drivers and applications for release on the http://preview.creativelabs.com website ?.
Imho it will make the official drivers much more stable and worthwhile for the average user. It is just a thought and suggestion

Hi Cat
Thanks for looking into this. :smileyvery-happy:
Hi rco0
Yes, but unfortunately that BETA driver is 4 months old and I know that there has been at least 3 updates (unreleased) to that driver since. It would be helpful providing BETA drivers on the preview site I mentioned so we could submit feedback directly to the Driver team and get regular updates. and feedback from them.

A suggestion to improve the adobe reader

This is a suggestion: Try with an option to change the voice of the speaker in many languages, I have installed a plug in in order to read the text in Spanish but losing the English voice, It also would be nice if the commands of the loud voice speaker are the same of the Power point in order to lie down on the sofa and control the adobe with a laser presentation remote

You'll get a lot further with a feature request here: https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform
This is a user to user forum and very few, if any development people frequent these pages.

Suggestions to improve the filter output of the acquired pulse signal

Hello,
I am working with acquiring the pulse signals form DAQ using a sample rate of 1k and number of samples as 1k for every 1sec signal using the DAQ.
I am using the smoothing type filter with Moving average->Rectangular->Halfwidth=3 and passing the smoothed signal to the butterworth filter with my requirements of 2.3hz and 0.7 with sample rate of 1000.
Problem:The filtered signal is always starting form 0 instead to start with the first value in the acquired pulse signal.For example, starting from 0 instead to start from around 0.057 as shown in the images.
How to make the filtered signal to start from the original pulse signal value.
Thanks in Advance.
Attachments:
improvementinfilter.jpg ‏164 KB

All filters have a transient response. A bandpass filter with a DC component at the input will have that transient strongly excited.
Some of the filter VIs have an Init? input. If the signal is continuous but is being filtered in segments, that input can help by retaining the previous state of the filter. The first transient will still be there, but later ones should be erduced or eliminated.
In the example VI attached you will find that there is a transient at the beginning of each segment. This is due to the sine signal not having an integer number of cycles.
The IIR Cascade Filter with I.C.vi and IIR Filter with I.C.vi in the Signal Processing >> Filters >> Advanced IIR Filtering palette have an initial state input.That might be helpful but calculating an appropriate set of initial conditions from the signal data may not be straightforward.
What do you want the output to look like? What are you doing with the filtered data? Perhaps there is a better approach than a filter.
Lynn
Attachments:
Filter transient.vi ‏19 KB

How do i improve the time it takes to download a rented movie

I'm not clear as to what I need to do to allow a rented movie on the Apple TV to download at a quicker speed. It can take anywhere from 2-5 hours to download before ready to view.

Get a faster net thays only way
inc speed of internet and speed of download inc
ok
do reply
cheers TGT

What is the best way to improve export time in PreE10?

I import the mts files directly from a sd card or HDD using PreE10's importer. Next, I add titles, video/audio fades, and transitions then export to DVD. Right now, my projects are 60min+~4min black video in length and exported directly from PreE10 as SD on a DVD. It takes on average 94min to finish this task.
What can I do/upgrade to speed up this process?
Computer specs:
Windows 7 Professional
-Intel Core i7-3770
8GB DDR3 RAM
SanDisk 128 SSD (OS+Programs)
WD Blue 1TB 7200RPM HDD (All media)
GTX 650 1GB
Would buying another SSD help? Would upgrading my processor dramatically improve the time? Or should invest in Premiere Pro and upgrading GPU?
I would like to stay using PreE10, but If there is nothing more that can be done to dramatically improve time, I would consider going to the next level with Premiere Pro.

You tell P-Elements to burn a DVD folder to your hard drive (look at the folder structure on a "Hollywood" DVD to see if you got it right) and then you have Imgburn write that folder to a DVD
-CS6 Trial Downloads http://forums.adobe.com/message/5649304
-and http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1315644
Here Win7 Tuning Help & Tips & Utilities
Windows Indexing is BAD http://forums.adobe.com/thread/676303
While in Properties, be sure you have drive indexing set OFF
-for the drive, and for all directories, to improve performance
http://www.decrap.org/ remove bloatware
http://support.microsoft.com/fixit/
Record Steps http://blog.raxco.com/2012/05/18/windows-7-tool-records-your-pc-problems/
Free System Optimizer http://www.iobit.com/advancedsystemcareper.html
Registry Cleaners http://windowssecrets.com/newsletter/putting-registry-system-cleanup-apps-to-the-test/
Be sure you have the default hard drive indexing OFF for all drives and folders!!!
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/220753/windows_7_godmode_tips_tricks_tweaks. html
Temp/Cookie Cleaner http://www.mixesoft.com/
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/789809
Win7 Toolbar http://WindowsSecrets.com/comp/110210
More Win7 Tips http://windowssecrets.com/comp/110127
Utilities http://windowssecrets.com/comp/110106 (Startup Solutions)
Win7 Help http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/category/w7itpro/
Win7 Configuration Article http://windowssecrets.com:80/comp/100218
Win7 Monitor http://windowssecrets.com:80/comp/100304
Win7 Optimizing http://www.blackviper.com/Windows_7/servicecfg.htm
Win7 Adobe Notes http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/508/cpsid_50853.html#tech
Win7 Adobe Update Server Problem http://forums.adobe.com/thread/586346
An Adobe Win7 FAQ http://forums.adobe.com/thread/511916
More Win7 Tips/FAQ http://forums.adobe.com/thread/513640
Processes http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896653.aspx
Compatibility http://www.microsoft.com/windows/compatibility/windows-7/en-us/Default.aspx
Win7 God Mode http://forums.adobe.com/thread/595255
CS5 Install Error http://forums.adobe.com/thread/629281
CS5 Help Problem http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/842/cpsid_84215.html
Win7 and Firewire http://forums.adobe.com/thread/521842
http://lifehacker.com/5634978/top-10-things-to-do-with-a-new-windows-7-system
http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/05/29/7-free-windows-7-tweaking-utilities/
Win7 64bit Crashing and "a" fix http://forums.adobe.com/thread/580435
http://prodesigntools.com/if-any-problems-downloading-or-installing-cs5.html
Harm's Tools http://forums.adobe.com/thread/504907
Also http://www.tune-up.com/products/tuneup-utilities/
Also http://personal.inet.fi/business/toniarts/ecleane.htm
Optimizing Hard Drive http://www.video2brain.com/en/videos-5353.htm
-and http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1083797
Win7 Reinstall http://windowssecrets.com/newsletter/win7s-no-reformat-nondestructive-reinstall/
Anti-Malware Tools http://windowssecrets.com/newsletter/the-advanced-system-recover-toolkit/
Repair AVI http://forums.adobe.com/thread/888268
Tune Vista & Win7 64bit http://forums.adobe.com/thread/436139
GPU Monitor http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/2092/TechPowerUp_GPU-Z_v0.5.8.html
http://windowssecrets.com/newsletter/clean-install-windows-7-from-the-upgrade-disc/
God Mode for Win7 and Win8
Create a new folder on your Win 7 desktop.
Copy and paste this name to the folder:
GodMode.{ED7BA470-8E54-465E-825C-99712043E01C}

Intresting Suggestions to improve the Time of replies

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for