Inventory data not matching with R/3

Hi,
In R/3 production we have the data from 1999-Till date.From 1999-2004 Data was archieved in R/3 system.So we have two years live data in the R/3 production.
We have filled the setup tables and extracted the Inventory data then loaded into 0IC_C03 Cube.
But the values in BW report from 0IC_C03 is not matching with the values in R/3 report.
1.What could be the reason?
2.If we need to extract the archieved data from R/3 what are the steps we need to do?.
Pls help us with your suggestions.

We have followed as per the How to handle inventory managment document.
The quanity value is matching between R/3 and BW.But the Valuated Stock Value is not matching for some of the materials.For the current period it showing the right value(for ex.if we check for 12th Month).
But If we check the material for old months like October,Aug the value of valuated stock value is not matching with R/3 for some of the materials.
In RSDV validity table date maintained from 1999-Dec'200.
We are using the standard business content cubes and update rules.Is there any change needs to be done in update rules for 0IC_C03 cube to get the right values for all the materials?..
Pls help with your inputs.
Thanks
Soujanya

Similar Messages

0FC_OP_01 extractor issues- DFFKKOPBW data not matching with

Hi All
We have an issue with the extractor 0FC_OP_01. Our business is comparing the values in
R/3 report u2013 G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277) with the
Open Items by GL Account report in BW .(actually these values in the BW report are coming from DFKKOPBW table in R/3) .
But since august, the R/3 G/L account balance report is not matching with the DFKKOPBW table balances. So bottom line the extractor 0FC_OP_01 is doing something wrong when populating the DFKKOPBW table which is causing these two reports to be out of balance
Did anybody face this kind of issue before? Please Advise.
FYI : We are following the same procedure to populate the DFKKOPBW table as in the below article.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a9996115-0b01-0010-b2b2-d9de0170a425;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417800%29ID0001499250DB01896329908162586522End
Thanks
KPK

In my case the Cube/PSA data itself is not matching with the R/3 report data.
Basically we run a job in R/3 in t-code FPBW with a Date id and Indentification. This job will pull the entries from base table DFKKOP into DFKKOPBW table .Then FRom this DFKKOPBW table data is loaded into PSA/Cube.
Here in my case the data in table DFKKOPBW itself is not matching with the R/3 report - G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)) .
I am following the same procedure to run the JOb in T-code FPBW to populate the DFKKOPBW table as listed in the document at the above link. Moreover this difference in balances is occuring only starting from August ..Till July the balances in DFKKOPBW tally with the R/3report.
Please advise ..
Thanks
KPK

Planning area data not matching with backup cube / PSA

Hi friends,
while loading data from planning area to backup cube , for the key figure ( result of a macro),the data in planning area is not matching with PSA as well as with cube.
At the same time Data is matching at total level but not at disagregated level. And many times it disagregate in equal Proportion in cube/psa.
Pls its urgent.
Pts for sure.
Vishal.
9326179903

make sure you have replicated the extraction of the data source. This is needed to ensure your backup cube gets the current data as in the planning area
if you got to /SAPAPO/SDP_EXTR then you can see this button
you can set this up as a program scheduled to run before the updation of your cube
As for the disaggregation, test at what level you are choosing your characteristic? ( i suppose you can choose the level)
Are you extracting at a detailed level or at the aggregated level
Is your macro saving the data into a Keyfigure or is it an auxilliary KF or something?

R3 data not matching with BW

Hi Experts,
we have an issue here. We are using 2LIS_11_VAITM and 2LIS_11_VASCL to load SD data. We use the fields RFSTK and RFGSK in BW to filter out orders that are processed. Now we find that these fileds dont match with the ones in R3. At R3 side i looked at VBUK table and it indicates properly the status of the order.
But in the BW side when we pull these the status fileds are not correct and they dont match R3 at all...How do i fix this.. Where can find or how can find from which table BW is actually pulling the information for these two fields.
Please reply.
DV

Hi Anil,
How these fields were added to the ES of those DS ?
How do i check this?
Have you done any Customer Exit (append method) to get the values for these fields?
Iam not sure, It was done formerly by someone.
If so, remember that we ca not get deltas that occured with the change to only appended fields of ES.
Does that mean the appended fileds dont work with Deltas.. they dont pick up the chnages??
DV
null

Inventory Valuated Stock Value is not matching with R/3

Dear Friends,
we are in a big mess.Needed your help urgently
We are in sap netweaver 2004s.We are implementing the standard business content only for one of our client.We have loaded the Inventory data into BW by following "How to handle the Inventory Management" document.
We have loaded the inventory data into 0IC_C03 using standard transferrules and update rules.
The sequence we followed as:
IN R/3
Filled the setup tables for during the posting free time(non-business hours)
Stock intialization
Material Movements
Evaluations
IN BW
We had loaded the data into only 0IC_C03 cube using standard update rules(no changes done)
2LIS_03_BX-Generate intial stock with no marker update unchecked
2LIS_03_BF-Full update with no marker update checked
2LIS_03_UM-Full update with no marker update checked
When we compared the data between R/3 and BW they are many materials "Valuated Stock Value" is not matching with R/3.For some materials value is matching with R/3 but for some other materials its not matching with R/3.Some materials are showing the negative figures for Valuated Stock Value.
But the valuated quantity value is exactly matching with R/3 for all the materials.
We have tryed to many ways in the past 10 days to find out the solution.We have followd the notes 589024 and implemented the formula.But no luck so far.
Needed your help..Any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
Please help us with your inputs.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Soujanya

Hi Sudheer,
No We haven't implemented this note.
In start routine we already have the first start routine in the note.
INSERT BEGIN
loop at DATA_PACKAGE.
 if DATA_PACKAGE-stockcat eq 'V' or
 DATA_PACKAGE-stocktype eq 'V'.
 delete DATA_PACKAGE.
 endif.
endloop.
if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
ABORT = 0.
INSERT END
We should comment the above start routine and follow the remaining section as below?
==========================================================
Notes:
However, if you want a report of these consumption values, proceed as follows:
1. Do not use the start routine listed above.
2. Create two new key figures (cumulative values):
 1. Material consumption value (ZVERWERT, for example) with unit 0BASE_UOM
 2. Material consumption quantity (ZVERMENGE, for example) with unit 0LOC_CURRCY
3. Include these in the InfoCube definition.
4. Update these key figures from 2LIS_03_BF as follows:
-> material consumption value:
IF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '100' "Other Issues
 OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '101' "Returns / Vendor
 OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '104' "Material Transfer
 OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '105' "Stock Adjustment InvD
 OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '106' "Stock Adjustment Other
 OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '110' ) "Issues from Stock
 "Transfers
 AND COMM_STRUCTURE-bwapplnm EQ 'MM'
only movements which are relevant for stock control
 AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
 AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
 AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
result value of the routine
 RESULT = -1 * COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
 RETURNCODE = 0.
ELSEIF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '000' "Other Receipts
 OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '001' "Goods Receipt/Vendor
 OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '004' "Material Transfer/"Receipt
 OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '005' "Stock Adjustment InvD
 OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '006' "Stock Adjustment Other
 OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '010' ) "Receipt from Stock
 "Transfer
only movements which are relevant for stock control
 AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
 AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
 AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
result value of the routine
 RESULT = COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
 RETURNCODE = 0.
ELSE.
if the returncode is not equal zero, the result will not be updated
 RETURNCODE = 4.
ENDIF.
if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
ABORT = 0..
-> material consumption quantity:
The code is the same, but COMM_STRUCTURE-cpquabu replaces COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
-> The characteristic value calculation is the same for the other key figures.
5. Update these key figures from the 2LIS_03_UM in the same way.
=======================================================

The value in flexfield context reference web bean does not match with the value in the context of the Descriptive flexfield web bean BranchDescFlex. If this in not intended, please go back to correct the data or contact your Systems Administrator for assi

Hi ,
We have enabled context sensitive DFF in Bank Branch Page for HZ_PARTIES DFF , We have created Flex Map so that only bank branch context fields are only displayed in the bank branch page and as we know party information DFF is shared by supplier and Customer Page so we dint want to see any Bank Branch fields or context information in those pages.
We have achieved the requirement but when open existing branches bank branch update is throwing below error message :
"The value in flexfield context reference web bean does not match with the value in the context of the Descriptive flexfield web bean BranchDescFlex. If this in not intended, please go back to correct the data or contact your Systems Administrator for assistance."
this error is thrown only when we open existing branches, if we save existing branch and open then it is not throwing any error message.
Please let us know reason behind this error message.
Thanks,
Mruduala

You are kidding? It took me about 3 minutes to scroll down on my tab to get to the triplex button!
Habe you read the error message?
Quote:
java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-04098: trigger 'PMS.PROJECT_SEQ' is invalid and failed re-validation
Check the trigger and it should work again.
Timo

Getting error when view - Requested data type does not match with existing

I have the siebel web service
In the BI publisher as mentioned in the 'Siebel_BI_Publisher_Integration_Concepts.pdf', I have imported the siebel web service
BI can recognize the 'Web service' and methods.
I have created the paramters. The data type is 'String'
When I try to view the report using the BI publisher, I am getting teh following error in th UI
"Requested data type does not match with existing data type"
This is the first time I am using BI publisher to call the Siebel web service. I don't know what this error means
I don't know whether any log file generated wit the details of this erro message
Any help is much appriciated
Thanks,
Kavitha

Hi all,
have you find a fix for this issue? Im facing the same situation, using Complex type, and String data type both in the service and Bi publisher. We are consuming CC&B services, and we have noticed this error appears when BIPublisher is running on WebLogic (10.3) but it does not appear when BIPublisher is running on OC4J , of course running the same report on both application servers.
Any idea?
Thanks a lot, regards
Nestor

Clean-up all data that did not match with the selection.

Hi Everyone,
In my requirement I need to Clean-up all data that did not match with the selection from my internal table lt_cdpos.....in this case wat can i use like.'Refresh' or ' Clear' or 'DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM lt_cdpos'.
Pls suggest me...

Hi Meenakshi
Try delete lt_cdpos where kunnr NE KUNNR (from selection screen) .
Before Checking <condition> make sure both comparing field type match with each other.
You can use FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_INPUT' for append leading zeros in compare condition before comparing kunnr from selection screen
Regards
Parveen

CO-PA Cost Component do not match with Standard Cost Component Values

Dear Members,
The CO-PA Cost Components (as mapped through KE4R), do not match with Standard Cost Component values for the Group Currency. In local currency the values match.
System is correctly picking up VPRS value, both in local currency and Group Currency, which is equal to the total of Standard Cost Components however, it is the Value Fields linked to the Standard Cost Components in Group Currency that do not match.
In KE40, the Indicator is 4:Released Standard Cost Estimate matching Goods issue Date.
I have verified KEPH/CKMLPKEPH tables. The values are same as that of VPRS.
Any help/clues?
Regards
Satya

Hi,
In case of billing documents the group valuation approach is managed in the data structures of the legal valuation in additional value fields. To control costs and revenues in the different views separately, you must create additional value fields and assign them to the data structures.
The field contents must be filled via the CO-PA user exit, they cannot be entered by assigning conditions to value fields. The profit center valuation is updated in a separate ledger. No separate value fields are necessary.
The exit to be used is function module 'EXIT_SAPLKEII_002' ( enhancement COPA0005 ). Within the exit you have the complete SD data avaialble in the tables 'T_ACCIT' and 'T_ACCCR'. The conditions can be found in T_ACCIT and the corresponding values ( linked via 'POSNR' ) in table T_ACCCR. The PA line item and the corresponding SD item in table ACCIT
can be mapped via the line item field 'RPOSN' and the field 'POSNR_SD' in table ACCIT.
regards
Waman

Multiple Version Issue. data not matching

Dear all,
pleas help me in this issue..
we have the Apo (DP) Cube. we are running the reports on this cube..
when we run the query we are giving the Verion ( means week) in the selections.. data is coming but.not matching with Apo..data..
we assumed that data is coming more. beacuse it might taking the data of previous year also.
so we included the Calyear and aksed user to selct both, vesrion as well as year.. because their req is for multiple version with historical data.
They want to see the data for multiple versions with historical data... even though data is not matching..
what we had done is again deleting all the data from Cube and dso an datasource , again loading... this time we asked user to run the report and match it the data is matching.. with vesrion
But when we go for historical data with mutiple version. its not matching ,
pleas help me out where to find out this probelm , what could be the cause ,.
how to chek
Awaiting your valuble fedback. its an uregnt issue.
if any thing else required pls let me know

Txs for your valuble reply..
We had checked that .
but when we unload and again loaded data this time it is matching on giving the version...
Where as in case of Multiplr versions . data is coming more.. donno wheather it is mixing up the duplicate data . or what not able to underand.
can you pls tell me steps how to analyse with your patiency...
Where and all we need to chek ....
Awaiting Your reply.

Vendor aging unreconciled bal. does not match with TB Acct. Payable balance

Dear all,
When i take unreconciled vendor aging report with selection creteria all vendor codes selected,aging date as 31/03/09 and posting date from 01/04/08 to date 31/03/09,Interval - 30 Days,By Journal postings
Deticked all check boxes in it.
Aging report total balance of all vendor does not match with account payable balance in Trial balance ?
But for reconciled aging totals and trial balance total are same.
How to solve it ? or i need to do any settings ?
Jeyakanthan

Hai!
What version of SAP B1 u r using.
I do got the same problem for my customer. I did this..
1. Run Aging Report for all Vendors. Donot check Recon Transaction.
2. Export to Excel
3. Run TB for BP selecting Vendors alone.
4. Export TB to Excel.
5. Find vendors who is having mismatch in their balance. (use V-Lookup in Excel)
6. Run Detail G/L Transaction report for those Vendors one by one.
*Selection from date: Age from date To date: Age To date *
*Selection Reconcilled Transaction only
7. Report Balance should be Zero. If not this problem is because of Internal Reconcillation.
8. Open *Check and Restore Previous reconcillation * select the vendor, internal
9. see the reconcillation details.
10. see the posting dates. All should be in previous fiscal year. (I mean the reconcilled set should have same fiscal year ex: Recon -2 trans should be in same fiscal year)
11. If, that is corrected and still difference exist means.
12.Go to Manage Previous Reconcillation
13. Select BP and Internal (Donot check system reconcill Trans)
14. Check the Reconcillation wheather all in same fiscal year.
Regards,
Thanga Raj.K
+91 9710445987

GL - Balances do not match with sum of Items

Hi,
I have a requirement in which I am pulling opening, closing balance and a list of all transactions (or items ) on a daily basis from GL to a flat file, and then loading in a third-party tool . Now, the issue is sum of all items (gl_je_lines ) should match with the diference of closing and opening balances.
I reconcilied the items with Oracle's Journal Report. Items are matching.
I also confirmed that closing balance of previous day matches with the opening balance of current date.
But, ( closing balance ) - (opening balance) does not match with sum(items)
I am using gl_daily _balances for opening and closing balance.
Waiting for your inputs/suggestions..
Yogini

Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
I am not using GL_INTERFACE. The tables I am using for Daily balances are:
gl_daily_balances
gl_code_combinations
chart_of_accounts
And for the items, I am using gl_je_lines, gl_je_headers.
Also, I am interested in Entered Amount in GBP as the Functional Currency is GBP and there are many transacitons in different foreign currencies.
More updates : I found that I have calculate the Entered Amount in GBP from all Converted/Transferred/Entered amounts in different currencies.
So, I tried the following :
(Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
from gl_daily_balances
where Currency_code = 'GBP'
and currency_type = 'U'
and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
MINUS
( Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
from gl_daily_balances
where Currency_code = 'GBP'
and currency_type = 'C'
and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
This way, I got opening and closing balance, but still the differernce between opening and closing balance is not matching with the sum of Items.
Any suggestions / inputs are highly appreciated.
Yogini

Sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report

Dear Gurus,
Looking Ur assistance for an issue.
Issue: For some of the sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report. Actual No of Pipes matches with LIKP table values in R3. Query needs to be modified to restrict records as per logic in WGSRLDES report/program.
Can U help me in this Regard.
Ur Responses are most appreciated.

Hey Pathak,
The problem is, BI report is matching with the datails with R/3 LIKP table. But the business user is using Report WGSRLDES report/program, where the data is missmatching.
Hope U got my Point.

Drill down value not matching with Displayed Report Painter Issue-GR55

Hi,
Need your help for an issue in drill down value of report painter from actual cost coloumn.
I have created a new report group based on OSS Note-157720 in GR55 Traction. This new report group will provide data of Planed / Actual cost, Planned / Actual Quantity of the project in range of fiscal year/periods. The issue in this report is displayed data of actual cost is not matching with drill down data. The actual cost coloumn is formula coloumn which framed by subtracting All periods cost coloumn, Before Periods Cost Coloumn and After periods cost coloumn.
Could you suggest on this issue.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Regards,
Rakesh

The report you are running first might have been created with some hidden columns that contain more than one variables relating to period and fiscal year. These may not be matching those that are required to run the drilldown. Look into the definition of the drilldown report. If you would want to match the first report, It may be better to identify which report runs on drilldown and the run that report with the required parameters.

Grand total values are not matching with Detail report

Report has grand totals and when I drill to the detail report, grand total values are NOT matching with parent report totals, I did some analysis but I'm clueless on this issue.
Please provide your thoughts and insight on this issue..
Thanks

is your summary and detail reports hitting different facts, like summary hitting aggregate and detail report hitting it's corresponding detail level fact..?
if then,
From Front-end:
Fix the filter values in detail report that are passing from master report then try delete each columns then check the grand total. If you found your values is matching by deleting particular column then you need to investigate what is the issue around with that dimension table..
From Database side:
1. check first aggregate table has proper aggregate data of it's detail..
2. Take the detail report obiee generated query and try to comment each dimension table and it's corresponding joins to the facts, (before, this delete all the dimensional columns and other measures from select statement and put only that measure where you are getting wrong value, so that you need not to comment all the select and group by columns which saves your time.. ). Need to check by commenting each dimensional wid and it's table from clause, if you found that values is matching then there is some problem with wid columns data population in your ETL.
Is that BI-Apps project?
btw, whtz ur name?

Inventory data not matching with R/3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for