Multiple Version Issue. data not matching

Dear all,
pleas help me in this issue..
we have the Apo (DP) Cube. we are running the reports on this cube..
when we run the query we are giving the Verion ( means week) in the selections.. data is coming but.not matching with Apo..data..
we assumed that data is coming more. beacuse it might taking the data of previous year also.
so we included the Calyear and aksed user to selct both, vesrion as well as year.. because their req is for multiple version with historical data.
They want to see the data for multiple versions with historical data... even though data is not matching..
what we had done is again deleting all the data from Cube and dso an datasource , again loading... this time we asked user to run the report and match it the data is matching.. with vesrion
But when we go for historical data with mutiple version. its not matching ,
pleas help me out where to find out this probelm , what could be the cause ,.
how to chek
Awaiting your valuble fedback. its an uregnt issue.
if any thing else required pls let me know

Txs for your valuble reply..
We had checked that .
but when we unload and again loaded data this time it is matching on giving the version...
Where as in case of Multiplr versions . data is coming more.. donno wheather it is mixing up the duplicate data . or what not able to underand.
can you pls tell me steps how to analyse with your patiency...
Where and all we need to chek ....
Awaiting Your reply.

Similar Messages

The SYSVAL table entry for the database version (16) does not match the required version

We upgraded from Tidal Enterprise Scheduler (TES) 5.31 to 6.1 on fresh Windows x64 2008 R2 servers. I did a fresh install but our DBA restored a copy of our database from pre-prod which was at 5.31. I get the error below. Note, SQL went from 2005 to 2012 during this upgrade. Do I need to change a value in this table to reflect the SQL change?
[04/29 12:47:14:198]:TIDAL Enterprise Scheduler: version 6.1.0.133
[04/29 12:47:14:198]:Java version: 1.8.0
[04/29 12:47:14:198]:Java Virtual Machine version: 25.0-b70
[04/29 12:47:14:198]:Start Time : 04/29/14 12:47:14:198
[04/29 12:47:14:198]:----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[04/29 12:47:14:198]:Database URL :jdbc:sqlserver://SQL2012-Host:1433;responseBuffering=adaptive
[04/29 12:47:14:198]:Database Driver :com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver
[04/29 12:47:14:198]:Maximum number of log files = 100
[04/29 12:47:14:198]:Added a LogFile called 'RegularFile'
[04/29 12:47:14:198]:LogManager: setting default log
[04/29 12:47:14:214]:Retrieved a LogFile called 'RegularFile'
[04/29 12:47:14:495]:MessageBroker: Instantiated TcpTransportServer (URI = tcp://0.0.0.0:6215)
[04/29 12:47:16:975]:Retrieved a LogFile called 'RegularFile'
[04/29 12:47:17:272]:The SYSVAL table entry for the database version (16) does not match the required version (23). Shutting down.
[04/29 12:47:20:282]:
[04/29 12:47:20:282]:
[04/29 12:47:20:282]:Shutting down the application

I had this error last night while applying a patch to 6.0. However in my case the version was 21 versus a required version of 23.
As far as i know 6.1 is not compatible with the 5 db schema, so you will need an update / migration plan for the db also.

0FC_OP_01 extractor issues- DFFKKOPBW data not matching with

Hi All
We have an issue with the extractor 0FC_OP_01. Our business is comparing the values in
R/3 report u2013 G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277) with the
Open Items by GL Account report in BW .(actually these values in the BW report are coming from DFKKOPBW table in R/3) .
But since august, the R/3 G/L account balance report is not matching with the DFKKOPBW table balances. So bottom line the extractor 0FC_OP_01 is doing something wrong when populating the DFKKOPBW table which is causing these two reports to be out of balance
Did anybody face this kind of issue before? Please Advise.
FYI : We are following the same procedure to populate the DFKKOPBW table as in the below article.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a9996115-0b01-0010-b2b2-d9de0170a425;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417800%29ID0001499250DB01896329908162586522End
Thanks
KPK

In my case the Cube/PSA data itself is not matching with the R/3 report data.
Basically we run a job in R/3 in t-code FPBW with a Date id and Indentification. This job will pull the entries from base table DFKKOP into DFKKOPBW table .Then FRom this DFKKOPBW table data is loaded into PSA/Cube.
Here in my case the data in table DFKKOPBW itself is not matching with the R/3 report - G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)) .
I am following the same procedure to run the JOb in T-code FPBW to populate the DFKKOPBW table as listed in the document at the above link. Moreover this difference in balances is occuring only starting from August ..Till July the balances in DFKKOPBW tally with the R/3report.
Please advise ..
Thanks
KPK

Data not matching for a key figure in ODS and In CUBE.

There is one key figure ( Net Units) where in the data is not matching in ODS and in CUBE for only one particular fiscal week (200714)but for the rest of the weeks its matching.
The data is first loaded in to ODS and from there in to CUBE and the source is from flat file.
The cubes are not compressed .so I checked the DB aggregation in the field selection for output screen but still its not matching .( based on the infocube addition property some times if a file is loaded multiple times it adds up in the infocube so when the cubes are not compressed we manually select this option) .
What might be the possible cause for this ???
thanks in advance
jayakrishna

HI,
By any chance if you have loaded same the delta twice into the cube, then there might be the chance of the corrupt data. SO identify the lowest level of document where u can identify the difference.I mean if possible 0calday wise or document leve wise or sales org wise etc. and try to find out where is the difference. Then check in the change log of the oDS, whether the request has gone into cube twice. last option is selectively delete the data from the cube for the week and load a full repair from the ODS for that week.
Sriram

Inventory data not matching with R/3

Hi,
In R/3 production we have the data from 1999-Till date.From 1999-2004 Data was archieved in R/3 system.So we have two years live data in the R/3 production.
We have filled the setup tables and extracted the Inventory data then loaded into 0IC_C03 Cube.
But the values in BW report from 0IC_C03 is not matching with the values in R/3 report.
1.What could be the reason?
2.If we need to extract the archieved data from R/3 what are the steps we need to do?.
Pls help us with your suggestions.

We have followed as per the How to handle inventory managment document.
The quanity value is matching between R/3 and BW.But the Valuated Stock Value is not matching for some of the materials.For the current period it showing the right value(for ex.if we check for 12th Month).
But If we check the material for old months like October,Aug the value of valuated stock value is not matching with R/3 for some of the materials.
In RSDV validity table date maintained from 1999-Dec'200.
We are using the standard business content cubes and update rules.Is there any change needs to be done in update rules for 0IC_C03 cube to get the right values for all the materials?..
Pls help with your inputs.
Thanks
Soujanya

Planning area data not matching with backup cube / PSA

Hi friends,
while loading data from planning area to backup cube , for the key figure ( result of a macro),the data in planning area is not matching with PSA as well as with cube.
At the same time Data is matching at total level but not at disagregated level. And many times it disagregate in equal Proportion in cube/psa.
Pls its urgent.
Pts for sure.
Vishal.
9326179903

make sure you have replicated the extraction of the data source. This is needed to ensure your backup cube gets the current data as in the planning area
if you got to /SAPAPO/SDP_EXTR then you can see this button
you can set this up as a program scheduled to run before the updation of your cube
As for the disaggregation, test at what level you are choosing your characteristic? ( i suppose you can choose the level)
Are you extracting at a detailed level or at the aggregated level
Is your macro saving the data into a Keyfigure or is it an auxilliary KF or something?

Data not matching in RSA3 and PSA.

Hi,
I have loaded data into BW from a Generic datasource and the values in R/3 and BW are not matching. Upon analysis, I found that the values for a characteristic are not matching even in RSA3 and PSA. All the values for other characteristics match excepting this single characteristic.
We have used user exit to populate the fields in the datasource in R/3. According to my knowledge, data in RSA3 and PSA should match. Can someone please tell me how the mismatch between RSA3 and PSA is occurring? Are there are any specific settings that I should be looking for?
Thanks in advance.

Hello karthik,
We have the same problem of difference in RSA3 and PSA data for 1 keyfigure...
it was a generic data source with function module....
The reason for this difference is When a record is splitted in to 2 or 3 data packages then you may get some inconsistencies in the data.....
Try to increase teh data package size and load then you will get the correct data(it worked for us)
Thanks,
Pavan.

RSA3 data and PSA data not matching

Hello All,
I am in BI7.0 and trying to Load FI_GL data usng 0FI_GL_4 DS from ECC6. I was able to install, activate all necessary standard objects that are involved. I have executed data Load from Infopackage by doing Init. with data Transfer..which went okay and now i am data upto PSA Level with everything green status. But when I noticed that in PSA Maintenance screen its showing whole lot more data..it shows 103 Datapackages transferred and lot of data records in each packages.
In R3 side (RSA3) shows only 831 records. IN BI7 , monitor screen shows more then 9 million records recieved.
Could anyone tell me why this happened? Is it possible that this particular PSA already had data on it? if so How can i find and delete previous records from this PSA? please suggest...
thanks
dk

Hello,
1)The error comes if the data is wrong in the DSO.
Something like before and after image are missing for a record and thats why change log is having some issues.
you can check the data between new tables and PSA and see if its matching or not.
Try to delete all the data from the PSA and the DSO.do proper mappings again especially in the keys of the DSO and then reload it.
try to load it for a small a amount like one company code and one fiscal period.check in PSA if its matching or not from RSA3.
2)If the data is getting loaded then there should not be a any problem with the data source.DTP could be an issue.the program is to activate the data source in BI 7 system and if the data source is already activated then you dont need this again.
3)Rule proposal can be generated if the fields are same and have same technical name.in your case the field name are different since its datasource and DSO mappings and therefore you will have to do mappings manually.
4)you mean RSA3??
RSA3 displays the data from tables only in case of full mode.Also,try to do full loads till the PSA and then check for the same in RSA3 in full mode.keep the package size and number of calls maximum so that it will show you correct number of records extracted.
RSA3 is an extractor checker and can be used for verify small amount of data,dont use it for verifying the datasource for all the drecords.
use underlying tables if you want.
if init is done properly then the data will be correct and you should verify it with the tables and not RSA3.
Regards
Ajeet

R3 data not matching with BW

Hi Experts,
we have an issue here. We are using 2LIS_11_VAITM and 2LIS_11_VASCL to load SD data. We use the fields RFSTK and RFGSK in BW to filter out orders that are processed. Now we find that these fileds dont match with the ones in R3. At R3 side i looked at VBUK table and it indicates properly the status of the order.
But in the BW side when we pull these the status fileds are not correct and they dont match R3 at all...How do i fix this.. Where can find or how can find from which table BW is actually pulling the information for these two fields.
Please reply.
DV

Hi Anil,
How these fields were added to the ES of those DS ?
How do i check this?
Have you done any Customer Exit (append method) to get the values for these fields?
Iam not sure, It was done formerly by someone.
If so, remember that we ca not get deltas that occured with the change to only appended fields of ES.
Does that mean the appended fileds dont work with Deltas.. they dont pick up the chnages??
DV
null

FDM Excel Import Issue - Data not loading.

I cannot get an excel mappping table to load to FDM. I am working on the Entiy dimension. I noticed a few things when trying to trouble shoot this. If you delete a record, the excel file will load that one entity back to the mapping table with the changes from the excel file. Also, if I delete the table and load a new mapping table with excel it will add the first record. The only thing that changes on the new load is the data key. I could not find anything in the Oracle forum on this.
When you manually load this data you do not add the sequence number, which seems to be always zero , the data key, which seems to be incrementing itself some how(but not sequentially) , and the partion key and dimname , which appear to not change. I was assuming that the issue was in the way I was adding this other data. I am obviiously new to FDM, so any help would be much appreciated. Thanks!

I am facing similar issue.
I am trying to map ICP Entries using an excel file.
I have made 2 mapping (explicit) entries, manually and exported it in Excel and then added all the Mappings in the same file, in proper format. when I am importing, I am not getting any error but the mapping is not getting updated and the new entries are also not getting added. so Ideally no Change in the tDatamap table.
Environment details: FDM Version 11.1.1.3 is getting used. Target App is Essbase 11.1.1.3. able to connect to Essbase, no issues with connectivity.
Has anyone face this issue.

Report designer issue:data not coming

Hi Folks,
I have an issue with bex report designer.
The thing is i have created a query in query designer and that is my data provider for report designer.
I am applying some formatting rules and executing it.
The problem is i am not geting any records except the fields.
Could anyone help in this regard.
Regards

HI,
There are different sections in a Report Designer. G0Header, G1 Header, Det, G1Footer, G0Footer
G0 Header: Contains only the labels of the feilds that is displayed on the top of every page.
G1 Header: is a level 1 header which is displayed Beneth the Group0 Header
Detail: will display the values of Query Elements(Key/Text) placed in this section.
G1 Footer: Will be displayed once for each G1 Header that is displayed. This Can have the totals.
G0 Header: Will be displayed at the end of the page. The footer can have page nuber or totals.
For Example:
To design a simple report having Distribution Channel and Sales Amount. The report can be designed as
G0 Header: [Distribution Channel].Key [Distribution Channel].Text [Sales Amount]
Detail: [Distribution Channel].Key [Distribution Channel].Text [Sales Amount].Val
G0 Header: [Result] [Sales Amount].Sum
Thanks,
Saranya

BW Archiving issue - Data not being picked up

Hi,
I am using ADK Archiving to archive a cubes data ( to application server files). The config is working perfectly in DEV however in QA I get "0 data records copied in volumes of 0 KB" even though data is present for the selection criteria.
I do not see any authorization issue or other error in job log... Anyone seen this issue before ? Please advise.
Thanks

Hello,
Are the requests compressed? In 700, the data in the infocube must be compressed or it cannot be archived.
Best Regards,
Vincent

R/3 data Not matching 0PS_C04 cube

hello guys, we had an oracle upgarde last week and "apprently after the upgarde the data in this cube isn't matching the data in r/3". first i thought may be the data in the cube was inaccurate, so
1) i cleaned the cube reloaded all the data accordingly, but it seems the error still existed.
2) Cleared the cube again and reloaded all the data from masters tables, to make sure nothing was missed
PROBLEM STILL persists,
Any suggestions?

Hi,
U r talking of which Data inconsistency,, is it Project and WBS element Data. If So, There exist Conversion Exit of Project and WBS element Data.
try these Following Conversion Exits in R/3 and then c how the Data gets changed
CONVERSION_EXIT_ABPRJ_INPUT    Converts External Project Number to Internal Project Number (Definitio
CONVERSION_EXIT_ABPRJ_OUTPUT   Converts Internal Project Number to External Project Number (Definitio
CONVERSION_EXIT_ABPSN_INPUT    Format > Without Edition (Project Number / WBS Element Number)
CONVERSION_EXIT_ABPSN_OUTPUT   Format > With Edition (Project Number / WBS Element Number)
CONVERSION_EXIT_ABPSP_INPUT    Conversion External > Internal WBS Element Number
CONVERSION_EXIT_ABPSP_OUTPUT   Conversion Internal > External WBS Element Number
assign Points if helped
Thanks

APD issue, Data not showing correctly in APD.

Hi All,
Please guys help me with this APD issue that I am facing.
There is an APD created whose target is a file and with one routine. Here the purpose of the routine was mostly just to sequence the fields the way I want them, and only to show certain ones, also to delete all KF that are zero.(which is commented out).
No matter what I do, it always gets data which has the key figures as all zeros. I put some code in there to delete the data which is all zeros but commented it out, because otherwise then it writes zero records.
The code part which delete all KF that are zero is commented out. Now we are getting the file data with commented code and without commenting code same.
The thing is, in Bex the query from which we are fetching data is showing proper data with zeroes as well as KF with values. But the same APD is showing only the data whose KF's are zeroes.
I am pasting the routine here:
REPORT RSAN_WB_ROUTINE_TEMP_REPORT .
TYPES: BEGIN OF y_source_fields ,
         COUNTRY TYPE /BI0/OICOUNTRY ,
         SALESORG TYPE /BI0/OISALESORG ,
         /BIC/ZFCSTGRP TYPE /BIC/OIZFCSTGRP ,
         PLANT TYPE /BI0/OIPLANT ,
         MATERIAL TYPE /BI0/OIMATERIAL ,
         FISCPER TYPE /BI0/OIFISCPER ,
         KYF_0001 TYPE /BIC/OIZBAS_FCST ,
         KYF_0002 TYPE /BIC/OIZTUN_QTY ,
         KYF_0002_UNIT TYPE MEINS ,
         KYF_0003 TYPE /BIC/OIZCOR_FCST ,
         KYF_0004 TYPE /BIC/OIZTOT_FRCT ,
         KYF_0005 TYPE /BIC/OIZTER_TFCT ,
       END OF y_source_fields .
TYPES: yt_source_fields TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF y_source_fields .
TYPES: BEGIN OF y_target_fields ,
         COUNTRY TYPE /BI0/OICOUNTRY ,
         SALESORG TYPE /BI0/OISALESORG ,
         /BIC/ZFCSTGRP TYPE /BIC/OIZFCSTGRP ,
         PLANT TYPE /BI0/OIPLANT ,
         MATERIAL TYPE /BI0/OIMATERIAL ,
         FISCPER TYPE /BI0/OIFISCPER ,
         ZBAS_FCST TYPE /BIC/OIZBAS_FCST ,
         ZTUN_QTY TYPE /BIC/OIZTUN_QTY ,
         BASE_UOM TYPE /BI0/OIBASE_UOM ,
         ZCOR_FCST TYPE /BIC/OIZCOR_FCST ,
         ZTOT_FRCT TYPE /BIC/OIZTOT_FRCT ,
         ZTER_TFCT TYPE /BIC/OIZTER_TFCT ,
       END OF y_target_fields .
TYPES: yt_target_fields TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF y_target_fields .
Begin of type definitions -
*TYPES: ...
End of type definitions -
FORM compute_data_transformation
     USING     it_source TYPE yt_source_fields
               ir_context TYPE REF TO if_rsan_rt_routine_context
     EXPORTING et_target TYPE yt_target_fields .
Begin of transformation code -
DATA: ls_source TYPE y_source_fields,
        ls_target TYPE y_target_fields.
LOOP AT it_source INTO ls_source.
   IF ls_source-KYF_0001 = 0
   AND ls_source-KYF_0002 = 0
   AND ls_source-KYF_0003 = 0
   AND ls_source-KYF_0004 = 0
   AND ls_source-KYF_0005 = 0.
     DELETE it_source.
     EXIT.
   ENDIF.
    MOVE-CORRESPONDING ls_source TO ls_target.
    APPEND ls_target TO et_target.
ENDLOOP.
End of transformation code -
ENDFORM.
End of transformation code -
ENDFORM.
Please help me and reply. Good answers are appreciated and rewarded with points.
Thanks,
Sumisha Subramanian.

Hi All,
Please guys help me with this APD issue that I am facing.
There is an APD created whose target is a file and with one routine. Here the purpose of the routine was mostly just to sequence the fields the way I want them, and only to show certain ones, also to delete all KF that are zero.(which is commented out).
No matter what I do, it always gets data which has the key figures as all zeros. I put some code in there to delete the data which is all zeros but commented it out, because otherwise then it writes zero records.
The code part which delete all KF that are zero is commented out. Now we are getting the file data with commented code and without commenting code same.
The thing is, in Bex the query from which we are fetching data is showing proper data with zeroes as well as KF with values. But the same APD is showing only the data whose KF's are zeroes.
I am pasting the routine here:
REPORT RSAN_WB_ROUTINE_TEMP_REPORT .
TYPES: BEGIN OF y_source_fields ,
         COUNTRY TYPE /BI0/OICOUNTRY ,
         SALESORG TYPE /BI0/OISALESORG ,
         /BIC/ZFCSTGRP TYPE /BIC/OIZFCSTGRP ,
         PLANT TYPE /BI0/OIPLANT ,
         MATERIAL TYPE /BI0/OIMATERIAL ,
         FISCPER TYPE /BI0/OIFISCPER ,
         KYF_0001 TYPE /BIC/OIZBAS_FCST ,
         KYF_0002 TYPE /BIC/OIZTUN_QTY ,
         KYF_0002_UNIT TYPE MEINS ,
         KYF_0003 TYPE /BIC/OIZCOR_FCST ,
         KYF_0004 TYPE /BIC/OIZTOT_FRCT ,
         KYF_0005 TYPE /BIC/OIZTER_TFCT ,
       END OF y_source_fields .
TYPES: yt_source_fields TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF y_source_fields .
TYPES: BEGIN OF y_target_fields ,
         COUNTRY TYPE /BI0/OICOUNTRY ,
         SALESORG TYPE /BI0/OISALESORG ,
         /BIC/ZFCSTGRP TYPE /BIC/OIZFCSTGRP ,
         PLANT TYPE /BI0/OIPLANT ,
         MATERIAL TYPE /BI0/OIMATERIAL ,
         FISCPER TYPE /BI0/OIFISCPER ,
         ZBAS_FCST TYPE /BIC/OIZBAS_FCST ,
         ZTUN_QTY TYPE /BIC/OIZTUN_QTY ,
         BASE_UOM TYPE /BI0/OIBASE_UOM ,
         ZCOR_FCST TYPE /BIC/OIZCOR_FCST ,
         ZTOT_FRCT TYPE /BIC/OIZTOT_FRCT ,
         ZTER_TFCT TYPE /BIC/OIZTER_TFCT ,
       END OF y_target_fields .
TYPES: yt_target_fields TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF y_target_fields .
Begin of type definitions -
*TYPES: ...
End of type definitions -
FORM compute_data_transformation
     USING     it_source TYPE yt_source_fields
               ir_context TYPE REF TO if_rsan_rt_routine_context
     EXPORTING et_target TYPE yt_target_fields .
Begin of transformation code -
DATA: ls_source TYPE y_source_fields,
        ls_target TYPE y_target_fields.
LOOP AT it_source INTO ls_source.
   IF ls_source-KYF_0001 = 0
   AND ls_source-KYF_0002 = 0
   AND ls_source-KYF_0003 = 0
   AND ls_source-KYF_0004 = 0
   AND ls_source-KYF_0005 = 0.
     DELETE it_source.
     EXIT.
   ENDIF.
    MOVE-CORRESPONDING ls_source TO ls_target.
    APPEND ls_target TO et_target.
ENDLOOP.
End of transformation code -
ENDFORM.
End of transformation code -
ENDFORM.
Please help me and reply. Good answers are appreciated and rewarded with points.
Thanks,
Sumisha Subramanian.

Scheduled date not matching std dates defined

Dear all,
We are facing scenario where when we create process order in the system, The system automatically assign dates of operation to be completed ( Earliest & Latest ) while in recipe we have defined std time for that particular phase. So my query is how system calculates those dates & where i can change or check so that system should throw dates in relationship with STD time provided for that operation.
Because of that we are not able to plan our capacity correctly as system itself showing not expected or correct timing for the operations.
Please refer following screen shot for your reference.
1) Operation screen for process order
Now for phase 0011,
please check phase details.
In formula for resource we have kept OH time as operation time.
So according to me, system should take show
1) for phase 0011 latest start time 07:00:00 & latest finish time 15:00:00 i.e. 8 hrs which is defined in recipe. as of now it shows 07:00:00 to 16:37:27. i.e. 9hrs 37 mins. approx.
Please advise,
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Deep Dave.

Dear KK,
Please find below SS for your reference.
1) Operation Screen
2) operation timings
3) Capacity header for resource used.
I guess this will be sufficient data to analyze. Please revert your thoughts on same.
Regards,
Deep D.

Multiple Version Issue. data not matching

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for