Invoice on block due to missing tax statement

Hi
I have one issue
There is a debit memo and credit memo and not being released to accounting.  SAP error says Tax statement item missing for tax code OC.  I have checked with our Master Co-ordinator and Finance team and both the tax status anc composite costs have been entered so we're not sure why its not releasing.  The debit memo # is 50963828 and credit memo # is 1073684940.
Regards
Sree

Hi,
Please check OSS Note 112609 and 400766.
The FF805 error is most likely triggered due to configuration in the pricing procedure.
If an active tax condition record is found (for example on UTXJ), even though it is statistical, the tax code (linked to the record) is then distributed to the active price conditions for that item pricing.
When it passes to FI, the active tax condition is passed but not the price because an active price condition cannot be found.
In the SD-FI interface, for every price condition sent over, there MUST be a tax condition sent over, hence the FF805.
This might be in your case.
Please set the reference steps in your procedure according to the guidelines in 112609.
Regards,
Gaurav

Similar Messages

  • (INVOICE) PAYMENT BLOCK DUE TO QUALITY REASON

    Dear All,
    We are working on QM implementation for one of our client.
    The process is as follows
    1.     MIGO with Mvt 103
    2.     Inspection lot is generated after Mvt 103
    3.     Usage decision for inspection lot. Lot accepted  and moved to Unrestricted use stock (Mvt 105)
    4.     MIRO w.r.to PO
    Requirement: We wish to have payment block for the material. For that we have maintained Control Key for u201CInvoice Blocku201D in Quality Management view of Material Master record. So that after invoice verification, invoice document is generated but the status should be u201CBlocked for Paymentu201D.
    Issue: For some of the purchase order u201CInvoice is blocked for the payment while for others invoice is not blocked for the paymentu201D. Please note that both the purchase order are identical in terms of material, vendor, pur grp, mat grp and all the possible entries.
    Moreover in another case, for the same purchase order, one invoice is blocked for payment while other is not blocked for payment.
    Regards
    Gunjan

    HI,
    There is a Quality Block (Block.reason: quality) check Box active in the MIRO,untill we have cleared the Stock from quality inspection.
    So we have to write in the Exit below
    EXIT_SAPLMRMP_010-ZXM08U16-----MIRO
    if this indicator SPGRC is "X" Configure an error message that material is in Quality inspection.
    Hope so it helps
    Regards
    Anjanna.

  • PO Invoice ..blocked due to Price Variance

    Hi
    I would like to know that how we can create a PO invoice if Purchasing document already exists. I would like to craeate this invoice such a way that it should have the price variance. Also how this invoice gets blocked and when we can unblock this. What all Tables are updated during this whole process?
    Also if any one could provide me documents on PO invoices where in the general business process is explained in layman's term then it would be a great help.
    Thanks in advance,
    Jigar Shah.

    Dear Jigar,
    It purely depends on the tolerances configured. If the price difference is more than the tolerance configured, the invoice gets blocked. The blocked invoices are available in the table RBKP_BLOCKED.
    There are two ways to remove the blocks, both using transaction MRBR
    These are:
      Manually, by indicating which block or blocks are to
    be removed
      Automatically, by running MRBR with the automatic
    In order to get familiarise with MM related transactions, it is recommended to visit sites like the one given below. This is purely MM related query. I have tried to answer it and I am open to correction, if any.
    http://www.sap-img.com/sap-mm.htm
    Trust this helps much!
    Cheers,

  • Invoice block due to tolerance limit

    Hello,
    I have created a PO for 600 DKK.
    I have created an invoice for 610 DKK and want to do the invoice verification in MIRO.
    The invoice gets blocked.
    Which tolerance limit is causing this?
    I have specified tolerance limits in transaction OMR6:
    1) PP (price variance): + 5% - 5% +15 DKK - 15 DKK
    2) KW (Var. from condition): +2% -2/ - -
    My 10 DKK difference between the PO & invoice lies between these tolerances.
    Are there any other tolerances to be fixed?
    Thank you for sharing your experience.
    Kind regards,
    Linda

    Hi,
    Stochastically blocked meaning that the invoice was blocked due to a payment block set at random in the document header. For each company code, we can define the degree of probability that an invoice will be stochastically blocked. In IMG setting, We mention Threshold value and the Percentage probability for our Company code.
    The degree of probability depends on the invoice value. If our Invoice value is the same or larger than the threshold value, the degree of probability is the same as the percentage probability maitained. If the invoice value is smaller, the degree of probability is calculated in proportion to the threshold value.
    Example
    Threshold value: 3000 percentage: 60
    Invoice value Degree of probability of a block
    3000 60 %
    5000 60 %
    1500 30 % (= 60 * 1500/3000)
    100 2 % (= 60 *  100/3000)

  • Invoice Block due to qty

    Hi All,
    I have a query on Invoice workflows . I'm trying to design an invoice workflow for Qty Block ( as there is no standard one ... although there is one for Priceblock). The event QuantBlock exists in the business object BUS2081 .but no method like ListBlockedPriceItemdata or BlockedPriceCheck which exist for Price variances .
    ....the requirement being to send a list of Invoice Lines Blocked  due to qty to the requisitioner , so that he can take some action . After that to recheck whether the invoice has any other qty variances ( this will be in a loop ).As the requisitioner can be different for every line item there can be multiple requisitioners for the invoice .
            Any ideas ?
    Regards,
    Radha Subramanian

    Well, this is sort of obvious....
    Create your own subtype and create your own methods using the SAP standard code as models for the implementation. Perhaps SAP implemented this for price blocks just to give customers an example of what is possible?
    As for the different requisitioners, that sounds like a candidate for dynamic parallell steps or subworkflows.
    When there is no standard functionality available (no function modules either like the ones for price blocks), then you don't have much choice. If you want it, you code it.

  • Release Invoice MRBR (Blocked for payment)

    Hello MM Experts I am handling one issue that is related to release blocked invoice. In my case invoice is blocked due to price difference though there is no price difference IN sceduling agreement, GR and invoice.
    when we go to MRBR to release invoice it is showing diff value coloumn as 241.99
    when i checked with ABAP team during debugging we found one formula as
    <b>Invoice value local currency=qty invoiced*Net order value/QTY ordered in PO
    261800*46376/261800=46376.00</b>
    diff value=Invoice value foregn currency- invoice value local currency
    241.99=46617.99-46376.00
    Now my question how 46617.99 (invoice value foreign currency) is coming?
    experts plz let me know ur thoughts on this

    Hi,
    If you are using a different vendor for the freight you must make sure to select the correct option in MIRO, you can select (in the central area of the first screen in MIRO)
    1 Goods/service  items
    2 Planned delivery costs
    3 is a combination of 1 and 2
    So to post the invoice for the items 9without the freight costs) select option 1
    then to post the fright costs seaparately (to the other vendor) select option 2 and make sure that you manaully change the vendor number to the correct freight vendor number. this will allow you to pay for the freight seaparately.
    If you are using 3 in error, the system will block the invoice due to the frieght charges not being claimed.
    Steve B

  • FF805 Tax statement item missing for tax code

    Hi,
    When i am releasing invoice into FI, getting subject Error:
    FF805 Tax statement item missing for tax code
    Kindly Guide us how we can trace though FM FI_TAX_SV_BSEG_BSET_GROSS .
    Bit urgent.
    Regards,
    Venkat

    Hi Venkat Reddy,
    Put a break at line 158 in FM   FI_TAX_SV_BSEG_BSET_GROSS and check out what is happening, that is the line giving error           
    Checkout how the data is populated in T_TAXCODES
    Please check that the Function Module  FI_TAX_SV_BSEG_BSET_GROSS, failed. In this function module table BSET - TXJCD, and BSET-TXJDP has different values, due to this the above said error has occurred. The Solution is both the Tables BSET – TXJCD & BSET-TXJDP, should have the same values.
    Please also ask your Abaper
    SELECT SINGLE auart INTO zauart
                        FROM vbak
                       WHERE vbeln = xaccit-kdauf.  "xaccit-aubel.
    In the select statement xaccit-kdauf is empty so exit does not check for Account Assignment to a WBS Element.
    We changed the select statement mention below, exist-works for alpha repairs svc (ZRAS) as well as Proj.Billing Request (ZPBR) document types.
    SELECT SINGLE auart INTO zauart
                        FROM vbak
                       WHERE vbeln = xvbrp-vgbel.  "xaccit-aubel.
    In this way we resolved this Issue in one of our Upgrade Project.
    Please Reward If Really Helpful,
    Thanks and Regards,
    Sateesh.Kandula

  • Error : Tax statement item missing for tax code

    Hello Gurus,
    I have issue while releasing a billing document to accounting from VF02. The error says 'Tax statement item missing for tax code AA'
    Any idea??
    Prase

    Dear Prasanth,
    Please review note 112609 and 400766 carefully, which explain the
    tax rules.
    The FF805 error is most likely triggered due to configuration in
    the pricing procedure.
    If an active tax condition record is found (for example on UTXJ), even
    though it is statistical, the tax code (linked to the record) is then
    distributed to the active price conditions for that item pricing.
    When it passes to FI, the active tax condition is passed but not
    the price because an active price condition cannot be found.
    In the SD-FI interface, for every price condition sent over,
    there MUST be a tax condition sent over, hence the FF805.
    I think may be what is happening in your case.
    If after setting reference steps in your procedure according to the
    guidelines in 112609, you still encounter the FF805, please let me know.
    Hope this is helpful. Thank you.

  • Tax statement item is missing for tax code E0 error

    Hi Experts!
    I am trying to enter an incoming vendor invoice via MIRO, and I am getting this error message when I try to simulate/post it.  The error message is "Message FF805 tax statement item is missing for tax code E0".  I checked the purchase order, and nothing seemed to be wrong.  I also looked through the SAP Notes, but could not find anything useful.  How to fix this?  Any help will be greatly appreciated and points too!  thank you for your time!
    Best Regards,
    WC

    Hi WC,
    Please check notes 112609 and 400766.
    For the accounts which are posted to on the simulation screen, set them to either a '*', '+' or a '-' as per note 395919.
    Please assign points if it useful.
    Regards
    Ravinagh Boni

  • Tax statement item missing for tax code S1

    Hi Guys
    I am trying to release an invoice to accounting, and the above error comes up
    "Tax statement item missing for tax code S1"
    Message no. FF805
    Diagnosis:
    No tax item exists for tax code S1 in a G/L account item. A possible cause is an incorrect transfer of parameters by the application to the Accounting interface.
    Procedure:
    Enter an OSS message
    Please help.
    Edited by: kofiyahya on Jun 14, 2009 7:10 PM

    Hi kofiyahya,
    Please Go thru the threads below,
    Error : Tax statement item missing for tax code
    FF805 Tax statement item missing for tax code
    FF805 Tax statement item missing for tax code O0
    Tax code error
    Thanks,
    Swamy H P

  • Tax statement item missing for Tax code XH

    Hello,
    We are trying to release on SD Invoice to accounting and we are getting the following error:
    'Tax statement item missing for TAx code XH'. Message no. FF805'.
    Has anyone seen this error before in this situation?  If so how did you fix it please?
    thanks for your help.
    Brett

    Hello,
    Please check whether the following SAP Notes solves your issue:
    Note 886536 - Collective processing for billing document results in FF 805
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Tax statement item missing for tax code Z5

    Hi,
    While releasing the billing documents to accounting we have the following error:
    Tax statement item missing for tax code Z5
    Message no. FF805
    Diagnosis
    No tax item exists for tax code Z5 in a G/L account item. A possible cause is an incorrect transfer of parameters by the application to the Accounting interface.
    Procedure
    Enter an OSS message.
    Could you please let us know whats going wrong.This is a priority to us.
    Your inputs are highly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Aravind

    HI Arvind,
    When you release this invoice to accounting the system check if there are any tax conditions (KOAID = D) that are non stastical (KSTAT = " ") found on the document.   If there is.... then this tax code must be applies (via the from and to steps) to a non statistical price/discount.
    VF02 + release to accounting:
    Main program     SAPLV60B
    Source code of   LV60BU01
      Aufruf aus Simulationsreport
               if sy-cprog = 'SAPFACC0'               >> SET BREAKPOINT
               or sy-cprog = 'SAPFACC1'.
                 export xacchd xaccit xacccr to memory id 'SAPLV60B'.
                 exit.
               endif.
    The XACCIT table is the interface table from SD to FI.  As you can see this is basically ahnding over the relevant conditions from the XKOMV table to FI.
    When the condition base value for the tax condition is 0.00 it will NOT get passed to FI. The from and to step for the tax condition writes the tax code to the non statistical condition, if a price code is passed to FI with a tax code there must be a tax condition passed to FI with the same tax code.  Otherwise ERROR FF805
    If the tax base value is zero..then it is obvious system will throw error message
    FF 805.
    If you have revenue lines containing a tax indicator XX, but no tax line with tax indicator XX, then the error FF805 issues, and it is justified.
    Please assign points if it useful.
    Regards
    Ravinagh Boni

  • Tax statement item missing for tax code O0

    Hi all,
    i am getting an error message while releasing SD billing documents to Accounting. the complete error message is
    NA FF805
    Text:
    Tax statement item missing for tax code O0
    Diagnosis:
    No tax item exists for tax code O0 in a G/L account item. A possible cause is an incorrect transfer of parameters by the application to the Accounting interface.
    Procedure:
    Enter an OSS message.
    It would be great help if some one reply back with what should i do..
    We are on R/3 4.7 enterprise
    Thanks in Advance
    Sivaram

    HI Sivaram,
    Please review note 112609 and 400766 carefully, which explain the tax rules.
    The FF805 error is most likely triggered due to configuration in the pricing  procedure.
    If an active tax condition record is found (for example on UTXJ), even though it is statistical, the tax code (linked to the record) is then distributed to the active price conditions for that item pricing.
    When it passes to FI, the active tax condition is passed but not the price because an active price condition cannot be found. In the SD-FI interface, for every price condition sent over, there MUST be a tax condition sent over, hence the FF805.
    I think this may be what is happening in your case.
    Normally it would not be advised to bypass the check in FI_TAX_SV_BSEG_BSET_GROSS - please note that when passing from SD to FI:
    -> There must be at least a revenue line for each tax line.
    -> For each revenue line containing a certain tax indicator there must be a tax line with this indicator.
    -> If a tax condition has base value = 0  OR is inactivated OR is statistical => then it is not passed to FI.
    I hope this information will help you to solve your issue. If it resolves your issue, kindly confirm this message at your earliest convenience. Otherwise, please give me feedback for further analysis.
    Please assign points if it useful.
    Regards
    Ravinagh Boni

  • Error:  FF805 Tax statement item missing for tax code O0

    Hi Gurus
    We are working in Upgrade Project 4.6C to ECC 6
    We are getting an error when releasing billing document  to accounting in ECC 6 System.
        Error:  FF805 Tax statement item missing for tax code O0
        No tax item exists for tax code O0 in a G/L account item. A possible cause is an incorrect transfer of
        parameters by the application to the Accounting interface.
    This issue occurs in both DEV and QA2.
    Please give your iputs and will be rewared
    Thanks and Regards,
    Sateesh.K

    hi,
    The problem may be due to missing authorizations.
    Please looking into the note 780589 and 188200.
    Hope this might be of some help.
    Regards,
    Imran

  • Shipping  Charge for free goods Error FF805 Tax statement item missing o0

    Hi,
    We handle a lot of free goods and Subsequent deliveries which are free of charge.
    The item category has been set "relevant for billing"  and "100% discount (B)" for relevant for pricing.
    We have absolutely no trouble in billing and creating the accounting document for the free goods.
    However, sometimes the client would like to charge shipping/handling/freight cost to customers on this. In this case (the net value is 0 and freight will have some amount), billing document is generated as expected but accounting document doesn't.
    We get the error "Tax statement item missing for tax code O0" FF805"
    We think this happens because the net value being $0.00.
    In pricing procedure all the shipping and tax condition types have requirement '2' (and I tried with blanks also)
    How to correct this issue?  The client wants to bill the customer for freight even if net value is $0.00.
    Helpful answers will be rewarded.
    Thank You,
    Manoj

    Hi Manoj
    Firstly , Check wheather the tax code O0 is assigned to MWST condition type in VK12 .
    Secondly check wheather that tax code you assigned is an input / output tax .
    Finally check what tax procedure has been assigned . and check wheather that tax code is available in that tax procedure or not
    Regards
    Srinath

Maybe you are looking for

  • Two annoying bugs when exiting guided acces via Touch ID

    When exiting guided access on my iPad Air 2 (iOS 8.1.3) via Touch ID, I encounter the following strange behavior: 1. the disabled areas I defined in the guided access mode (the "greyed-out" areas where touch input is not accepted) remain as grey area

  • HT3204 my phone has no service in the upper left corner, help please

    My iphone has no service in the upper left corner, please help

  • Deleting a number of files in one click ?

    How do i remove a number of managed masterfiles or versions in one step ? If i select a number of photos, file, delete master image and all versions....then only one photo at a time will be deleted ? Secondly, how do i delete all photos in total libr

  • Upgrades:  What to discard?

    I really don't know what I'm doing when I'm downloading and installing upgrades. What do I keep that is "old" and what do I discard - if anything? For example, I downloaded an upgrade to iTunes and installed it in "Applications" on the HD. In "Applic

  • Delete Divert Numbers

    Hello every one in cyber space, quick question about my 5200, how in the @#$% do I delete Numbers I have logged into the Divert Menu? As you can tell I am not a big fan of manuals that are incomplete with operating instructions. Thanks.