Invoice split per customs status

Dear experts,
At my customer we want to split invoices per customs status. This means no Duty Paid and Duty Unpaid should be on 1 invoice, neither do mix with inward processing products....
The company only wants to use final invoices, so no proforma. This final invoices is created as soon as picking is done, so before goods issue, because they want to win time between requesting permission to load the truck and printing the invoice...
Goods issue is then done when the loading is finished and the truck shipment is completed.
So at the moment of invoice creation we don't know which stock is used, because no communication to GTS is done until invoice or goods movement....
Our original solution was to use this BADI on ECC: Determine GTS Relevance for Stock Separation but this BADI only works on the moment of goods issue.. so this is too late for my customer since the invoice is then already created.
Has anyone already met this problem / requirement from customer?
is it possible to receive the stock status (DP or DUP) in ECC before creation invoice via some sort of variable, if so we can link it to MSEG in ECC and create a splitting requirement....

This is no longer an issue, as invoice split is no longer required by Belgian law.

Similar Messages

Reoprt to see the invoice as per the status

HI All,
What is the standard report / Program that excute when we display the invoices as per the status?
Thanks in Advance
Snehal

Hi,
There is one function module BBP_PD_INV_GETLIST which can server your purpose.
If you pass the status and date , you can get the list of Invoices satisfying the input criteria.
Hope this is useful.
Regards,
Sheetal.

Splitting of Customer Invoice item

Hi
I have requirement from my colleague in SD Module. When an Invoice is made against Sales to a particular Customer, the requirement is that the total amount is split as 95% and 5% - the reason being 95% payment is made when goods are delivered and rest 5% is made after certain other conditions are met. The Client's requirement is that in Customer Line Item Display (FBL5N) - the 2 items have to be shown separately. The reason being they want to track the balance 5% separately - Invoice Number wise - esp. because certain deductions are made by the Customer against the 95% and tracking of the 5% separately is very important.
Is there any way this could be managed - from FI side - as my colleague has not found a solution from SD side.
Thanks in advance
Aninda

Hi,
    You can realise this with the payment term.
      Create a payment term (eg 1234) and set the flag "Installment payment"
       In obb9 make the entries
         Payment term     Installment        %        Payment term (real term for this portion)
         1234                         1                95           xxxx
         1234                         2                  5           yyyy
When you post using this term the system will automatically split the customer/Vendor item.
Kind regards

Invoice Split for same customer but for different output types

Hi Gurus,
I have a requirement from the customers. A new output type has to be created with reference to the old type and for this output type a new driver program and SAP script was created with reference to the old one.They wants invoice split to be happened based on item level PO number. That was done successfully.
This invoice split logic was written in the billing routine RV60C901(Customized).
But now they came back with a issue that the invoice split should be done only if they use the new output type but not for the old one. That means for the same customer for one output type invoice split should be done based on item level po number and for one output type it should not. How can this be controlled for a particular
output type?
This output types will not be used in the billing routine as the split happens at the sales order level. Is there any configuration that allows split for a particular output type.
Please suggest me how to proceed???

Hi,
In the invoice split routine check if it is possible to find the output type making use of field symbols.
Just check in debug if the variable for output type is available as follows:-
(Program Name)variable name.
Regads,
Ankur Parab

Interesting requirement Invoice split in Duty free warehouse,

Interesting requirement Invoice split Duty free warehouse,
We have one requirement from the business
1) As per the forecast from the dealer business will send the Vehicle in the duty free ware house of the dealer and from there dealer will sales the vehicle to end customer
There are three price component that is
Base price of the Vehicle
GST
Import Duty
Requirements
1) Business will treate it as a sales and will issue the invoice to the dealer as soon as the vehicle transfer into duty free warehouse. The invoice will contain Base price and GST but will not contain the import duty
2) Payment term of the above invoice will start once posted to account
3) Once dealer will sale the vehicle to the end customer. Business will charge *the import duty to the dealer and GST on the import duty *
3) Business is asking us to split this in 2 invoice
1)* with Base Price + GST*
2) with Import Duty + GST
4) The payment term of the second invoice will start after is posted to invoice not with 1st invoice
Solution we provided:- We suggest business to issue the debit memo but they are not agreeing
Kindly suggest any solution for this issue aswe cant split the invoice as there is only one line item and also no on the basis of price
Thanks
Krishna

Hi Krishna....
As per your scenario you have to create two pricing procedure, and two document type One for Basic+GST (First case where no Import Duty will be applicable) in this case both condition type Basic price and GST will be post to account. Second document will have second pricing procedure where Basic and GST will be marked as statistics (Not posting to account) but Import duty condition type will be post to account and it will debit to customer for e.g.
Scenario 1.
BASIC            2000 CR
GST                 100 CR
CUSTOMER    2100 DR
Scenario 2.
BASIC                  2000 Statistics
GST                      100 Statiscts
Import Duty             50 CR (post to account)
CUSTOMER             50 DR.
Regards
Shambhu Sarkar

Splitting on customer defined fields in Grants Management

Hi All,
I am implementing a grants management solution where funds are drawn down from the sponsor using resource related billing based on payments. As part of the reporting to the sponsor we are required to report information from the grants management ledger (payment documents) with information from a third party system which triggered the initial expenditure against the grant. The join between the information is a reference number passed from the interfaced system.
My solution is to put the reference number in a customer field in the coding block and have updated the GM field movement to populate the field in GMIA. I would like to put this field in the splittng rules in grants management so that for the reporting to sponsor can be a straight forward join on the interfaced system and the data from payments in GMIA (rather than splitting in the general ledger then joining GMIA, flex GL data and the interfaced system).
The fields which can be used in splitting in GM seem to be a predefined list. I have traced this in debug and found a function module GM_SPLIT_T8G40_FIELDS which is defining the list of fields availale and translating the the field name. Any field for which it cannot find a new field name in this function module is being deleted from the list of valid fields. Therefore, customer fields are deleted from the available fields for splitting.
Can anyone suggest a way around this?
Kind regards,
Geoffrey

OK, it's something along the lines of:
Vendor Invoice posted in GL:
Entry view:
CR Vendor                                         1000 GBP
DR Expense/Customer field A              600 GBP
DR Expense/Customer field B              400 GBP
GL View (splitting on customer field):
CR Vendor/Customer field A                 600 GBP
CR Vendor/Customer field B                 400 GBP
DR Expense/Customer field A               600 GBP
DR Expense/Customer field B               400 GBP
GM document (not possible to split on customer field)
Value type 54 CR Vendor                            1000 GBP
Value type 99 DR Expense/Customer field A 600 GBP
Value type 99 DR Expense/Customer field B 400 GBP
Payment Posted:
GL Entry Veiw
DR Vendor            £1000
CR Bank Clearing £1000
General Ledger View (split on customer field)
DR Vendor/Customer field A                 600 GBP
DR Vendor/Customer field B                 400 GBP
CR Bank Clearing/Customer field A       600 GBP
CR Bank Clearing/Customer field B       400 GBP
GM Document (not possible to split on customer field)
Value Type 54 DR Vendor            £1000
Value Type 57 CR Bank Clearing £1000
In GM, there is no link back to the values in the customer fields when the payment is made as the field movement from GL to GM is based on the line items and values in the the entry view and not the split general ledger view. If the split GL data were used to populate the GM tables, then the data would already be split by the customer field by the time it reaches GM, negating a need to split on the customer field once in GM.
It still feels, however, that the simplest solution would just be to have the GM ledger split by customer fields. I have tried raising a customer message with SAP, but this query falls outside of their support remit.
Kind regards,
Geoffrey

Actual Cost component split - Per PO

Dear ML Experts,
We have activated Material Ledger and Actual costing/ Actual cost component split in our implementation. The standard cost is based on delivery costs and there is no manufacturing involved. In order to test ML, we created some POs and did a GR and IR for those POs. When I look at the Material Price analysis on the Price Determination Structure View, I can see the Price differences per transaction (Goods receipt, Invoice receipt).
But when I go to the Cost component View (Actual), I cannot drill down into the individual transactions. I am able to see the actual cost component split only at the summarized level across multiple transactions. I can see the category Purchase Order under Receipts, but I am unable to drill down to see the actual cost component split for the individual transactions (goods receipts, invoice receipts). Did I miss anything on the configuration? The client wants to see the price differences per cost component per transaction and actual cost component split per transaction.
Is it possible to view this information using standard configuration? Would I have to change the controlling level in order to achieve this?
Can you please provide your advice?
Thanks,
Balram

Hi Balram.
If you have access to an IDES system, you can see a Cost Component split like this:
As fas as I know, this is only for educational porpouses. In the standard System, its not recomended have the detail of the split per movement, due to the huge amount of data genereted. There is a Flag that control this, in a Txxx table (i dont have access to the system right now).
If you really want this functionality, write SAP in the marketplace, and I guess their response is exactly what im saying.
Arturo.

Invoice split

hi
i created sales order for the material with 2 qty. i delivered 2 qty. after PGI, the customer asked two invioce (mean each qty). i set Billing relevance K in item category level. But problem is , first i saved on one billing document. i am not able to create another billing for another qty. Error is invoice is incorrect? please rectify
regards
murali

Hi Murali,
As a rule, the system combines into one billing document all transactions for the same customer, default billing date and sales organization.
If data from the related reference <u>documents differs in the header fields of the</u> billing document, the system will automatically split the invoice.
An order contains terms of payment at header as well as item level. These are stored only at header level in the billing document, however. If there are different <u>terms of payment</u> in the reference documents, an invoice split will always be made.
If data from the related reference documents differs in the item fields of the billing document, the system does not split the invoice.
The order basis is stored at header level in the order and at item level in the billing document. The system does not split the invoice. If you require an invoice split, you must first define the appropriate split requirements in Customizing for copying control. Copying control depends on the following criteria:
Billing Document Type
reference document type (i.e. type of order, delivery or billing document on which the sales document is based)
item category in the reference document
You can also display a split analysis to discover why an invoice split has occurred.
Regards
Srikanth.A

Sample Report: Sales per Customer by Period - WITH QUANTITIES

I am trying to make some modifications to the 'Sales per Customer by Period' sample report, but am having problems. I want it to be YTD and comparative, so YTD-12. That part was easy enough. Then I wanted to add the quanty. So i want the report to show the sales amount and quantity for each customer, ytd and prior year ytd. This seemed easy enough also, until I looked further into the data. It doesn't match up with reports from Business One. The problem seems to be my items that are packs, like an item that is sold in packs of 10. If the invoice has 10 10 Packs on an invoice, my report shows a quantity of 10. The SBO report shows it as a quantity of 100 (10x10). I have tried to add Item level stuff, so I could go get the 'Items per Sales Unit' value and multiply it by the quantity. When I do this the report crashes.
Does anyone have any suggestions? Has anyone created a report like this? Any help would be appreciated.

Hi,
What is your B1 version and PL? Is this a Crystal Report or PLD?
Thanks,
Gordon

Stopping Invoice Splits

Dear Friends,
Need your expert tips to stop invoice splitting in the folllowing scenario :
Scenario :
Client is changing terms of payment at the item level of Sales Order. This changed terms of payment differs from the terms of Payment at document header. Here single delivery document is being created. Finally this single delivery is getting split into two invoices.
I found in the "split analysis" that split is happening due to the different header data for a) Terms of Payment Key b) Foreign Trade data.
Query :
Client wants to have a single invoice for the above delivery scenario. I tried changing Data transfer VBRK/VBRP routine for the relevant item category in delivery to Billing copy control but could not zero in on the exact configuration.
Whether there is any standard routine to achieve this or shall I create a new routine ?
What other setting is required here ?
Requesting you to please share your views soon.
Thanks in advance !

Hi Anubhav,
You cannot combine line items having different payment terms in one invoice, reason being payment terms is a header field in invoice and it applies to the entire document i.e for all the line items.
Moreover Payment terms are also responsible for deriving the "Baseline date" which is taken into account while ageing of customer line items.
Also when the customer pays you he pays with reference to the invoice # and not the line item # in a particular invoice.
It is not logical also to group number of line items with different payment terms in single invoice. it might have impact in FI also, so please consult FI people also before you make new routine.
Regards,
Shantanu Kunte

Invoice Splitting

Hi,
I am in a situation where my Client want to split the invoices on the basis of condition types. Scenario is, I have a single line item for which price is calculated with 6 different condition types. My client want to send customer 6 different invoices for this single line item, payment terms are same, payer is same, bill to party is also same. What are the possibilities to acheive this and how to configure this in the System?
Regards,
Muhammad Imran

Hi Imran,
Yes u can have separate bill for each line item. U can create 2 invoices if there are two line items. Check the menu path. billing---- country specific featues-Maintain max. numbers. Going further if u modify copying requirement available in vtfa at item level with the help of abaper differentiating conditon type u can have further invoice split.
Thanks,
Pramod

Invoice split with examples

Hello guru
can any one send the details regarding invoice split with examples
[email protected]
thanks in advance

hi,
As a rule, the system combines into one billing document all transactions for the same customer, default billing date and sales organization.
If data from the related reference documents differs in the header fields of the billing document, the system will automatically split the invoice.
An order contains terms of payment at header as well as item level. These are stored only at header level in the billing document, however. If there are different terms of payment in the reference documents, an invoice split will always be made.
If data from the related reference documents differs in the item fields of the billing document, the system does not split the invoice.
The order basis is stored at header level in the order and at item level in the billing document. The system does not split the invoice. If you require an invoice split, you must first define the appropriate split requirements in Customizing for copying control. Copying control depends on the following criteria:
Billing Document Type
reference document type (i.e. type of order, delivery or billing document on which the sales document is based)
item category in the reference document
You can also display a split analysis to discover why an invoice split has occurred.
Thanks
Sadhu Kishore

B1 and SQL Server 2005 performance with 3.000.000 invoice-lines per year

I would like to know if SAP Business One with SQL Server 2005 could work with the following information:
- 40.000 Business Partners
- 40.000 Invoices per month
- Aprox. 3.000.000 invoice-lines per year
Of course it will be necessary to change some forms in B1.
What do you think?
Do you know any B1 customer working with that amout of data?

> Hi,
>
> I think a good SQL2005 tuning (done by a good DBA)
> will improve performance. Number of records like that
> shouldn't hurt that kind of DB engine...
Hi,
I'm sure that MSSQL2005 can handle the amount of records & transactions in question. Even MSSQL 2000 can do it. However, any DB engine can be put on its knees with the combination of 2-tier application architecture and badly designed queries. B1 is a case in point. I wouldn't go into such a project without decent preliminary load testing and explicit commitment for support from SAP B1 dev team.
I have heard from implementation projects where B1 simply couldn't handle the amount of data. I've also participated in some presales cases for B1 where we decided not to take a project because we saw that B1 couldn't handle the amount of data (while the other features of B1 would have been more than enough for the customer). The one you're currently looking at seems like one of those.
Henry

Sales BOM per customer

This might be a strange question but still. We have a customer who ships out pallets and crates to their customers. They want to be able to track these items of course and bill the customers according to the number of items they received. N.B. these items are not returned so returnable packaging is out of the question.
We are looking at the use of a sales BOM so we can calculate the number of pallets and crates per sales order and delivery based on the number of finished products they ship out and of course create an invoice where these items are listed as part of the delivery with the actual costs. This works quite satisfactory BUT it will only work when either all customers use the sales BOM or all customers do not use the sales BOM.
What's the problem, as this is a new process, they will not be able to convince all customers to directly pay for pallets and crates that are being shipped out. We are now facing the problem that for part of the customers they want to use a sales BOM and invoice them for the pallets and crates they receive BUT for part of the customers they do not want to invoice them for the pallets and crates they receive. This means that we are looking for a way where we can indicate, per customer, whether to use a sales BOM (ship out and invoice pallets and crates) or not to use a sales BOM (do not logically ship out and invoice pallets and crates).
Is this possible yes or no? Maybe with a user exit that checks for a specific field in the customer master? We have already defined two sales BOM's per material, one where pallets and crates are used and one without pallets and crates so we could mis-use the alternative sales BOM principle, but we still need a trigger to call either sales BOM.
Any help would be appreciated.

Hi Roberto and Biju,
We looked at both options but neither are workable. Not all warehouses use HUM because not all warehouses are their own warehouses, some are from logistics service providers who have not SAP access, otherwise the problem would be a bit easier, plus the customer does not use packing and will not use packing in the future.
The dynamic product proposal was a bit more promising but also there, we encounter a problem because we cannot make a calculation on the number of crates and pallets shipped out to a customer, which is one of the requirements.
The problem still lies in the fact that
- Customer A does not want a bill for crates and pallets and therefore does not want to see the items on the delivery and the invoice.
- Customer B does want a bill for crates and pallets and therefore needs a calculation for the number of pallets and crates he received.
We cannot set a field somewhere that says customer A without these items, customer B with these items and then trigger something else.
Thanks for the help but we still haven't solved the problem.

Invoice split due to different price group

Hi Experts,
My business scenario starts from scheduling agreement -OBD- Commercial Invoice-Excise invoice - ARE3 Invoice
To address different prices in the scheduling agreement i have maintained the pricing based on price group.
The two line items falls different price group, it is fetching the prices correctly
but the problem is ,invoice gets split up because of different price group.
I know the control is in copy control VTFL- data VBRK / VBRP-invoice split, here VBRk-ZUKRI is not accounted with VBRP-KONDA_AUFT
Could you please help me to explain this split functionality in details to avoid splitting of invoice ..please
With regards,
Pratheep

Hi friends,
Split due to Different header data
Price group (Customer) 5 and 4
How to overlook this split, where do i bypass this splitting functionality
Thanks,
Pratheep

Invoice split per customs status

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for