Actual Cost component split - Per PO

Dear ML Experts,
We have activated Material Ledger and Actual costing/ Actual cost component split in our implementation. The standard cost is based on delivery costs and there is no manufacturing involved. In order to test ML, we created some POs and did a GR and IR for those POs. When I look at the Material Price analysis on the Price Determination Structure View, I can see the Price differences per transaction (Goods receipt, Invoice receipt).
But when I go to the Cost component View (Actual), I cannot drill down into the individual transactions. I am able to see the actual cost component split only at the summarized level across multiple transactions. I can see the category Purchase Order under Receipts, but I am unable to drill down to see the actual cost component split for the individual transactions (goods receipts, invoice receipts).  Did I miss anything on the configuration? The client wants to see the price differences per cost component per transaction and actual cost component split per transaction.
Is it possible to view this information using standard configuration? Would I have to change the controlling level in order to achieve this?
Can you please provide your advice?
Thanks,
Balram

Hi Balram.
If you have access to an IDES system, you can see a Cost Component split like this:
As fas as I know, this is only for educational porpouses. In the standard System, its not recomended have the detail of the split per movement, due to the huge amount of data genereted. There is a Flag that control this, in a Txxx table (i dont have access to the system right now).
If you really want this functionality, write SAP in the marketplace, and I guess their response is exactly what im saying.
Arturo.

Similar Messages

  • Need to de-activate Actual cost component split

    Hi All,
    I need to de-activate Actual cost component split in the test client.
    It has been activated by my testing associate by mistake.
    Please let me know the do and donts if anyone has done this de-activation before.
    I could not find any relevent OSS messages or consulting notes on this topic
    We are using ML Actual Costing and Multi Currency  - without actual cost component split.
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    Vik Sood

    Hi Balram.
    If you have access to an IDES system, you can see a Cost Component split like this:
    As fas as I know, this is only for educational porpouses. In the standard System, its not recomended have the detail of the split per movement, due to the huge amount of data genereted. There is a Flag that control this, in a Txxx table (i dont have access to the system right now).
    If you really want this functionality, write SAP in the marketplace, and I guess their response is exactly what im saying.
    Arturo.

  • Report painter/writer for actual cost component split

    Hello Gurus,
    Any of you guys ever explored possibility of creating a report using report painter or writer that can give both Standard and Actual cost component splits in one report? Is it even possible without custom ABAP involvement?
    Thanks
    RG

    Hi Raghu,
    After your reply, I am getting a doubt..
    Have you Activated Material Ledger? When you say Actual Cost Component Split, are you talking about it what you get in Actual Costing/Material Ledger?
    If yes, then you can map your cost compnents for Actual Costing in the path SPROControllingProfitability AnalysisMaster Data Valuation--Setup Valuation using Material Cost Estimate -- Define Access to Actual Costing / Material Ledger
    Further, there are no standard reports available in COPA. Try to build a report comprising two columns, 1st column with the value fields which are mapped for Standard Cost Components and 2nd column with the Value Fields which you have assined for Actual Costing under the above path.
    You will be able to get the comparison...
    Pls don't hesitate to call me for further assistance....
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • Actual Cost Component Split for cross company code transfers.

    Hi,
    My issue is as follows.
    Production process spans across 2 company codes.
    Goods are produced in production company code, transferred (via stock transport order) to marketing company code and sold to customers from marketing company code.
    Stock transport order follows sales scenario i.e.. marketing company code creates purchase order for goods from production company code and production company code bills marketing for the goods.
    Actual costing / Material ledger is implemented in both company codes.
    We would like to roll-up (transfer) actual cost component split from production company code to marketing company (in a similar way as in product cost planning in cross-company scenario).
    However, due to the fact that the transfer between the companies is in fact a "sales" the goods in marketing company code are seen as externally purchased and the only cost component we can create is based on PO conditions. But we want to get the info about production cost component split.
    Once again this is for ACTUAL cost component split.
    I would be grateful for any ideas.
    Thanks,
    Szymon

    Hi Udo / Szymon.
    I have a question about this issue.
    In the sap help  about multiple valuations / group costing:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7e/cb848443a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
    Its not clear if this can roll up the Actual CCS? or what it do? My question is because i read the documentation of  bussiness function: LOG_MM_SIT,and also the book *Actual Costing with The SAP Material Ledger*
    states that we can handle the rollup of actual cost component split inter-company only with this BF active.
    Could you clarify about this?
    thanks!!
    Arturo.
    Group Valuation
    Goods movements between affiliated companies not involving intercompany profits are processed using the group view. This view determines the actual cost of goods manufactured for the group, and does not include any intercompany profits. You can, however, display internal profits as delta profits in the legal and/or profit center views.
    When you define cost components, you can specify that internal profits between company codes and/or profit centers are shown in detail in the cost component split. You activate these delta profits for the group valuation in the attributes of the cost components.
    For each cost component structure, there can only be one cost component under which the delta profit is shown. This means that neither the legal view nor the profit center view can have more than one cost component for the delta profit.
    To cost multiple values, you define a costing type for each valuation approach in Customizing for Product Cost Planning. You use the costing type to specify which valuation approach you require. You define each costing type in a new costing variant and carry out a cost estimate with this costing variant.
    Group Costing and Multiple Valuation Approaches
    In-Depth Detail of the Value-Added Chain: Partner Cost Component Split
    You can display in detail the costs of materials and services of every company department in the value-added chain for every stage of the production process. The partner can be traced for every material used. To do this, you define a partner version, which enables the value-added portions of each manufacturing level to be displayed in detail. For further information about this, see Partners and Direct Partners.
    The group cost component split can be displayed according to your partner definition. You can display the cost structures of the partners hierarchically according to your requirements, such as the company code segments on the highest level and the plant or profit center segments underneath.
    To display partner cost component splits, define a partner version in Customizing and enter it in the costing type.

  • Raw Material Costing with Actual Cost Component Split

    Hi All
    I have requirement to split inventory RM Value with material component and Freight cost, all config done and looks well if I check at CKM3N cost component view, material cost $100 and Freight $20, I GR the inventory with freight cost, since I'm using actual costing when journal freight cost go to Price Difference account. But after actual costing closing why the system can't split the variance update to freight cost component? is this the standard SAP behaviour?
    Please help for the solution
    Regards
    Luiz

    I see that you want to split your material cost and freight cost. you need to check the following:
    Is your current standard cost estimate support this structure i.e do you have seperate cost components for RM and Freight.
    If not first you need to change cost component structure and as mentioned by owen you to map the purchase condition type to the origin group and cost component structure.
    Then system will do the same for the actual costing

  • COPA Costing key for actual cost component split

    Hi,
    I would like to allow the users to specify different period/year in the following screen every month when they do the COPA revaluation. However i noticed this screen is part of customization and cannot be changed by the users without a transport. As such how can we allow the users to change the period/year by themselves every month?

    Hi Sanjay Ram,
    Whatever the marked one i.e. period/year is used especially when you want to consider the PUP or actual cost the material for that specific period only. As you know it can not be changed in every period.
    So, for that purpose only we have the above one i.e. period a/c to line item, by this system is going to pick the PUP or actual cost of the specific period for which the line item has taken place (the line item that may be billing or settlement)
    Regards..
    Jose

  • Actual Cost Component Split Datasource

    Hello all,
    Did anyone work with 0CO_PC_ACT_10.
    I am using 0CO_PC_ACT_10 datasource to feed Infocube 0COPC_C07, we have loaded data period wise and based on actual costing run and we are validating data with ECC using CKM3.
    My aim is to get for category ending inventory (EB). Single level price differences and quantity is matching with CKM3 values but multi level price differences are not matching.
    I have tried searching in SDN and related sap notes but couldnu2019t find anything appropriate.
    Kindly assist and please let me know if you need anything more.
    Thanks,
    Rakesh

    Hi Rakesh , 
    The datasource 0CO_PC_ACT_10 uses the extractor - KKBW_CCS_BW_GET_DATA to extract its data .
    And in the extractor - KKBW_CCS_BW_GET_DATA,
    i could locate these tables - ckmlhd and  ckmlmv011 .
    So you can check these tables for your information .
    You can also have a look at this :
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/02/a2e338d96cd84fe10000000a11405a/frameset.htm]
    Thanks ,
    Lokesh

  • Material Ledger: Cost Component Split (Elements) table CKMLKEPH

    Hi All,
    Whats the use of this table, what information get updated in this table while creating invoice.
    Message was edited by:
            Alexander

    Hi Alexander,
    CKMLKEPH belongs to material ledgers actual cost component split database:
    Differences from Actual Costs to Standard Price
    Entries per material, update, cost element structure, kind of difference and level
    Created per any update where occur differences
    so if ML is active with actual CCS and your invoice has a price diference than CKMLKEPH will store the split of the price difference posting.
    it is related to CKMLKEV.
    this note gives some further links
    <a href="https://websmp206.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=01100107900000000342&_EVENT=REDIR&_NNUM=398941&_NLANG=E">Note 398941 - INFORMATION: CO-PC-ACT (Data structures)</a>
    best regards,
                         Udo

  • Material Ledger Active - K088 Settlement doesnt use Actual Cost Comp Split

    Production Order quantities are all scrap (in confirmation) thus order balance contains Consumed Materials and Activity Allocation
    When KO88 Settlement is run, the system uses Standard Cost Component Split to allocate the residual to Cost Components instead of the Actual Cost Component Split
    When we run the flow trace, the message says:
    "Splitting according to output material S-Price CCS"
    Expectation was that costs would flow according to Actual Cost Component split.
    There is note 756167 - This note activates the update of the actual cost component split information in the material ledger document when you perform the order settlements.
    However current release is 604, so its expected that this is already applied.
    Any help or insight on how to settle using Actual Cost Component split is appreciated.
    Edited by: Chris Gibson on May 5, 2010 8:57 PM
    Edited by: Chris Gibson on May 5, 2010 8:59 PM

    The second option you mentioned of using separate value field for transferring the standard cost component split from the actual cost component split is the way SAP designed this integration between CO-PA and the Material Ledger.  But 40 value field for cost component split is excessive.  CO-PA allows up to 120 value fields maximum, so I agree it does not seem prudent to use 80 of them for this purpose.
    I suggest you reexamine the level of detail you think may be needed in CO-PA and try to use CO-PC reports at the cost element level to report on more detail.  Keep the CO-PA view more aggregated and you can stick with the standard solution for comparing standard to actual costs in CO-PA.
    Best regards,
    Jeffrey Holdeman

  • Activating Cost Component Split

    Hi People,
    I have to do some tests and for while i need to activate the "cost component split" in the path:
    \IMG\ Controlling\ Product Cost Controlling \ Actual Costing/Material Ledger \ Actual Costing \ Activate Actual Cost Component Split  (by valuation area)
    I would like to know if there is some impacts for that and
    if we have some problems to revert, becuase at this moment it is only a test.
    Thanks,
    Rosana.

    Hello Paul,
    Thanks for your answer.
    We already use "material ledgder" but we don´t have activate component split. But look, what I am talkin is only one transaction (that I said before), becuase I have to do some test inside the aplication BW and it is a prerequisite.
    I would like to know what is the impact to activate the component split on that transaction I said before.
    It is only a test, but I don´t know if I put a flag in that transaction, the system will create some table internally.
    And other thing I don´t know is, if It it is possible to reverte the activation (only in that transaction) that I would update and if there is some impacts.
    Thanks a lot.

  • S_ALR_87013644 - Cost Centers: Cost Component Split

    Dear SAP Gurus,
    I am executing Cost splitting in KSII, and the values are coming correctly while doing the test run. However in the report S_ALR_87013644 - Cost Centers: Cost Component Split , price per unit is getting doubled. For example
    Cost center X actual costs 20000
    Activity unit for this cots center 2000 hrs
    After splitting the value per hr=10
    However in this report, per hr cost is coming as 20.
    Is this a standard way of calu
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Pls check the cost centers that you entered when executing the report.
    If there are more than 1 cost center was selected, the system will sum the activity price per unit of all selected cost centers then display..
    So the value maybe different from your expectation.
    Regards!
    Edited by: The Cuong Than on May 6, 2010 4:57 AM

  • Cost component split transfer for Profit center valuation in ke27

    Dear All,
    We have activated multiple valuation/transfer prices. Material ledger is also activated.
    We want to transfer cost component split to CO-PA by ke27.
    We have defined separate costing keys for access to actual cost estimate for legal and profit center valuations.
    But cost component split transfer to COPA works only for legal valution. Even we have defined type of valution for profit center  costing key -transfer cost component split and total costs.
    What should be else customized to transfer cost components splitting in profit center valuation to CO-PA from actual cost estimates?
    With best regards,
    Kamila.

    Hi,
    I have assigned the same value fields used for legal valuation to column 2, which was pointed in message.
    But now I got following message in ke27:
    For actual data, value fields that were already populated before CO-PA valuation cannot be changed in valuation.
    1. As a rule, value fields that were filled before CO-PA valuation - be it from SD or by a manual entry of a line item - can only be changed by means of user exits.
    (Note that for plan data, CO-PA valuation always has priority over the values planned manually.)
    2. The valuation steps in a CO-PA valuation strategy are numbered sequentially. These numbers determine the order in which the steps are carried out within that strategy. As a rule, value fields populated in one step can be used as a basis for calculating values for other value fields in a subsequent step.
    Value fields that were populated in a previous step are generally not overwritten by subsequent steps.
    The exception to this are steps that use a CO-PA user exit. User exits let you change individual value fields.
    3. If you valuate using multiple material cost estimates simultaneously, this means that the values of different cost components within the same cost estimate are aggregated and then entered in one CO-PA value field. However, value fields that already contain data from a previous cost estimate are not overwritten by a later cost estimate. Consequently, you should assign value fields in Customizing so that the values of different cost estimates are entered in different sets of value fields.
    4. When condition values are transferred to CO-PA value fields, note that condition types that are assigned to the same value field are added together. This is also the case when the condition types come from different costing sheets within the valuation strategy.
    So does it mean we should define separate value fields for PC valuation?
    With best regards,
    Kamila.

  • Cost component split datasource

    Hi,
    We recently activated 0CO_PC_ACT_10 Cost Component Split datasource and bringing info into 0COPC_C07 cube for the costing analysis.
    Acccording to the requirement need to extact the cost of finished material and cost of semi finished material into BW. The relevent costs are avaialble in R/3 in T code CKM3N. The finished and semi finished materials are differenciated in R/3 with Prefix C. ex: If material is 10000 then semi finished material will be C10000.
    We modelling as per SAP standard and loaded, we are able to load cost of finished material with sales order but not able to load cost of semi finished material with sales order. (need to analyse cost of semi finished material with sales order in reporting)
    Any inputs on how to bring cost of semi finished material with sales order in BW cubes. Also we are thinking to write new extractor as this standard extractor is not meeting our requirement.
    I would like to know is anybody got similar requirement, or is anybody involved in enhancing this datasource for getting sales order with semi finished materials?
    Please let me know your thoughts. If you need any more info from my side let me know.
    Thanks
    Naveen

    Hi Rakesh , 
    The datasource 0CO_PC_ACT_10 uses the extractor - KKBW_CCS_BW_GET_DATA to extract its data .
    And in the extractor - KKBW_CCS_BW_GET_DATA,
    i could locate these tables - ckmlhd and  ckmlmv011 .
    So you can check these tables for your information .
    You can also have a look at this :
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/02/a2e338d96cd84fe10000000a11405a/frameset.htm]
    Thanks ,
    Lokesh

  • Activate Cost Component Split in Controlling Area Currency

    Hello,
    I have controlling area currency USD and company code currency INR. When I do WIP run then system is giving error messages "contr.area currecy is missing" and "not find valid cost component structure" and suggesting to maintain "Cost Component Split in Controlling Area Currency".
    When I maintain then after that I am not able to run CK11N for std.cost estimate only with the error "cost componenet spit costed with zero" and also system giving this message on front screen of ck11n, means not allowing to go into ck11n result screen.
    Could you please give me some tips or check point on this issue.
    Thanks
    Regards
    Ravi

    I'd revert to the Cost Component per Co Area currency config that you were forced to delete (as per your other post) - but this time, just for a Costing Type or a specific Val Variant and check the results.
    Maybe that'll throw some light... also check if you maintained all the Exchange Rate config in your system... check General Settings for all the config that is required.
    Cheers.

  • Material ledger wrong cost component split

    i have change the price detemination from '2' to '3' in the material ledger in period 04/2011.
    now i wont to execute costing run for actual cost in period 10/2010. to do this i have update tables CKMLPRKEKO e CKMLPRKEPH..
    in this mode I don't have error in costing run, but i have a big problem . i don'have a correct cost component split becouse all the value is on row material.
    i give a look to the SAP table and i find table MLAUFKEPH and table MLKEPH that don't have data for period 10/2010.
    someone can help me?
    thank you.
    Your issue is not related to FI but with MM, therefore your thread was moved to MM forum so the experts will be able to help you better.
    FI Moderator.

    I think this table gets updated only during changes to the material price(Accounting View) thats basically price change.
    Once the Material is created, price changes are carried out using MR21.
    Rajeev

Maybe you are looking for