IPC filters limitations?

Hello all.
We need to download from R3 to IPC informations about a catalog with about 1000 materials.
For this is set two filter files for ipc for product data and for condition data.
Initially the product file looks something like.
range=MARA,MATNR,I,EQ,000000000000287001
for each material a line.
The problem was that like this is not working.
The file is written correct, because is used a report to generate it. and is working if there are few materials( I've try with 30) not about 1000.
Then I've change it to intervals:
range=MARA,MATNR,I,BT,000000000000200000,000000000000300000
But like this is downloading a lot of informations, instead of data for 1000 materials is downloading for 200000 in this case. Is lot of disk space a time waste.
Can someone help me? How can I set the filters to download data only for what I need?
Is there a limitation on filter file size?
Any help will be very appreciated and rewarded.
Thank you
Bogdan

Basically as you suggested, the size of these buffers vary between different OS implementations, but as long as you always consume everything you get from the program as soon as it occurs, this isn't a problem.
So... just make sure you consume everything from getInputStream() and getErrorStream() as soon as it occurs, and you're guaranteed that those buffers will never run out of space. As for getOutputStream(), it's "safe" to feed to that as fast as you want, but you have to trust that the other program doesn't have a bug where it doesn't consume its own input stream.

Similar Messages

Filters limitation in Performancepoint Services 2013

Hi Folks,
I am developing a dashboard which is having more no.of filter and each filter is having many no.of values. So, when try to apply all the filters and their values then I am facing an exception "Access is Denied".
Is there any limitation of filters for passing large no.of values?
And how PPS passes the filter values to web parts, using URL or any other way?
Thanks, Madhu

Hi Madhu,
We discuss SQL Server PowerPivot for SharePoint related issue in this forum. According to your description, this issue is more related to PerformancePoint Service.
I would suggest you using the ULS Viewer troubleshoot PerformancePoint errors. For detail information, please refer to the article below:
http://knowsharepoint.com/using-the-uls-viewer-to-troubleshoot-performancepoint-dashboard-designer-errors/
PerformancePoint Services troubleshooting:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/tothesharepoint/archive/2010/06/23/performancepoint-services-troubleshooting.aspx
If you have any more questions regarding PPS, please discuss them in the forum below:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?category=performancepointserver
Regards,
Elvis Long
TechNet Community Support

MI424WR (Rev. E) - Wireless Broadband Router MAC filtering limitation.

I can not input more than 10 MAC addresses into the Wireless Settings->Advanced Security Settings->Wireless MAC authetication->Enable Acsess list->Accept all devices listed below. When click Apply it returns the error message that no more that 10 items can be in the list. How can I increase that limit to say 128 ?
By the way Actiontec Support Respose was:
"That is correct. Verizon has limited the MAC Filter programming to a maximum of 10 devices."
Why Verison does that? And how can I increase the limit?
I have:
Firmware Version:
20.20.2
Model Name:
MI424WR-GEN2
Hardware Version:
E
Thanks.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

10 MAC addresses is a known limitation of the router and not likely to be changed.
FWIW, filtering of wireless MAC addresses serves no useful purpose. Wireless MAC address can easily be sniffed
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/ou/the-six-dumbest-ways-to-secure-a-wireless-lan/43

Sender Filtering Limit: error 80072024

We cannot add more senders to the Sender Filtering on ESM, with error "The administrative limit for this request was exceeded, 80072024"
There is any possible way to raise this limit?
Exchange 2003, all updates applied.
Regards

Hi,
I agree with Rich. This limit is by design, currently, there is no method to increase the total number of the limit. Here is an article which can help you to understand this for your reference.
Message Filtering Limits:
http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/09/message_filteri.html
Note: Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. The sites are not controlled by Microsoft. Microsoft cannot make any representations regarding the quality, safety, or suitability of any software or information found there. Please make
sure that you completely understand the risk before retrieving any suggestions from the above link.
Best regards,
Belinda
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Netflow on 6509 in Native Mode from Vlan Interface

I'm trying to get a 6509-E, running Cisco IOS Software, s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-IPSERVICES_WAN-M), Version 12.
2(33)SXI9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2), to send netflow traffic from a vlan interface to a Solarwinds server.
The server is not seeing all the vlan traffic, but does see all the traffic on the layer 2 ports (not netflow).
I've seen that a command, ip flow ingress layer2-switched vlan, needs to be enabled, but the OS I have does not support that command.
Or could it be that MLS is not configured except for a couple commands:
mls netflow interface
mls cef error action reset
netflow setup:
Flow export v5 is enabled for main cache
Export source and destination details :
VRF ID : Default
    Source(1)       10.31.101.1 (Vlan52)
    Destination(1) 10.30.2.196 (2055)
Version 5 flow records
14927339 flows exported in 615072 udp datagrams
0 flows failed due to lack of export packet
0 export packets were sent up to process level
0 export packets were dropped due to no fib
0 export packets were dropped due to adjacency issues
0 export packets were dropped due to fragmentation failures
0 export packets were dropped due to encapsulation fixup failures
0 export packets were dropped enqueuing for the RP
0 export packets were dropped due to IPC rate limiting
0 export packets were dropped due to Card not being able to export
interface:
interface Vlan52
description AN.VDI.stu
ip address 10.31.101.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 10.31.149.200
no ip redirects
ip flow ingress
ip flow egress
ip pim neighbor-filter 98
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
ip cgmp

Enabling MLS was the fix.
mls netflow interface
mls flow ip interface-full
mls nde sender version 5
mls cef error action reset

NDE on 7600

I have a 7600 running 12.2(33)SRE1. I was wondering why mls nde export statistics aren't incrementing.
I have the following configured:
ip flow-export source Loopback3
ip flow-export version 5
ip flow-export destination 192.168.2.200 9995
mls flow ip interface-full
no mls flow ipv6
mls nde sender
mls sampling time-based 512
I have Vlan interfaces with ip flow ingress configured.
interface Vlan804
ip address 192.168.4.1 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip verify unicast source reachable-via any allow-default
ip flow ingress
load-interval 30
end
A show ip flow export shows me exported flows... the counters increment
RTR7600#show ip flow export
Flow export v5 is enabled for main cache
Export source and destination details :
VRF ID : Default
    Source(1)       192.168.100.1 (Loopback3)
    Destination(1) 192.168.2.200 (9995)
Version 5 flow records
315756904 flows exported in 10536943 udp datagrams
0 flows failed due to lack of export packet
0 export packets were sent up to process level
0 export packets were dropped due to no fib
0 export packets were dropped due to adjacency issues
0 export packets were dropped due to fragmentation failures
0 export packets were dropped due to encapsulation fixup failures
0 export packets were dropped enqueuing for the RP
0 export packets were dropped due to IPC rate limiting
0 export packets were dropped due to Card not being able to export
A show mls nde shows me nothing
RTR7600#show mls nde
Netflow Data Export enabled
Exporting flows to 192.168.2.200 (9995)
Exporting flows from 192.168.100.1 (62867)
Version: 7
Layer2 flow creation is disabled
Layer2 flow export is disabled
Include Filter not configured
Exclude Filter not configured
Total Netflow Data Export Packets are:
    0 packets, 0 no packets, 0 records
Total Netflow Data Export Send Errors:
        IPWRITE_NO_FIB = 0
        IPWRITE_ADJ_FAILED = 0
        IPWRITE_PROCESS = 0
        IPWRITE_ENQUEUE_FAILED = 0
        IPWRITE_IPC_FAILED = 0
        IPWRITE_OUTPUT_FAILED = 0
        IPWRITE_MTU_FAILED = 0
        IPWRITE_ENCAPFIX_FAILED = 0
        IPWRITE_CARD_FAILED = 0
Netflow Aggregation Disabled
Do the versions need to match? Is that what is preventing the mls nde export? Any suggestions or tips for troubleshooting this?
show mls netflow table-contention summary
Earl in Module 1
Summary of Netflow CAM Utilization (as a percentage)
====================================================
TCAM Utilization             :   0%
ICAM Utilization             :   0%
Netflow Creation Failures    :   0
Netflow CAM aliases          :   0
Earl in Module 2
Summary of Netflow CAM Utilization (as a percentage)
====================================================
TCAM Utilization             :   19%
ICAM Utilization             :   0%
Netflow Creation Failures    :   0
Netflow CAM aliases          :   0
Earl in Module 3
Summary of Netflow CAM Utilization (as a percentage)
====================================================
TCAM Utilization             :   56%
ICAM Utilization             :   0%
Netflow Creation Failures    :   0
Netflow CAM aliases          :   0
Earl in Module 5
Summary of Netflow CAM Utilization (as a percentage)
====================================================
TCAM Utilization             :   16%
ICAM Utilization             :   0%
Netflow Creation Failures    :   0
Netflow CAM aliases          :   0
Earl in Module 6
Summary of Netflow CAM Utilization (as a percentage)
====================================================
TCAM Utilization             :   0%
ICAM Utilization             :   0%
Netflow Creation Failures    :   0
Netflow CAM aliases          :   0
Thank you,
Danny

I did set the mls nde sender version to match up with netflow, but the real resolution to this problem was an extra command that was needed. I have time-based sampling turned on globally and I'm running a version of 1.2(33)SR code above SRB. You have to turn on "mls netflow sampling" under the layer 3 interfaces that you want nde export under for newer version of code. In the past, you could enable sampling globally, and it would work. Now you have to enable sampling globally AND turn on sampling under each interface. The code I'm running is SRE1.

Upload Friendly (Multiple File Upload Applet)

Title : Upload Friendly (Multiple File Upload Applet)
Description : UploadFriendly is an easy to use Java Applet that will allow multiple file
uploads on a web server in a web page. The control supports file filtering, limits and more.
Samples available in the following languages: ASP, ASP.NET, PHP, Coldfusion and JSP
Link: http://www.uploadfriendly.com/
Type: Commercial (30 days Trial)

Hi shiil,
To move the documents between site collection, content organizer rules would be a recommended method, you can activate Content Organizer features to enable content organizer rules on the site, to root the document to another site collection.
Also, for this issue, as Prasath suggested, you can check out the document in the ItemAdded event, then add ItemCheckedout event, in the ItemCheckedout event, delete the document. Or as content organizer rule does, you can create your own timer job to move
the document.
More information, Content Organizer Feature Overview for SharePoint Server 2010 Developers (ECM):
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/ee558288(v=office.14).aspx
Thanks,
Qiao Wei
TechNet Community Support

IP Source guard feature enabling

Dear All ,
My organisation has a requirement that if any user change the IP of his system , he should not able to access anything from his machine .
I have read that IP source guard feature on cisco can be used to achieve the same .
Can some body explain the process . Also if i have a unmanaged switch( 24 port ) connected to the Cisco L2 switch . so can i enable IP source guard for multiple source IP's on single port .
Kindly revert urgently .
Rgds,
Tushar

Hello Tushar,
IP Source Guard provides source IP address filtering on a Layer 2 port to prevent a malicious host from impersonating a legitimate host by assuming the legitimate host's IP address. The feature uses dynamic DHCP snooping and static IP source binding to match IP addresses to hosts on untrusted Layer 2 access ports.
Initially, all IP traffic on the protected port is blocked except for DHCP packets. After a client receives an IP address from the DHCP server, or after static IP source binding is configured by the administrator, all traffic with that IP source address is permitted from that client. Traffic from other hosts is denied. This filtering limits a host's ability to attack the network by claiming a neighbor host's IP address. IP Source Guard is a port-based feature that automatically creates an implicit port access control list (PACL).
Below is the CCO document for your reference..
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12-2SX/configuration/guide/book/ipsrcgrd.html
Regards,
Mohit

Essbase Database copy

Hi all, Is there any way to copy Essbase database without filters? Our Essbase databases have thousands of filters. Every time we make copy, it is reaching maximum filters limitation. Please let me know if there are any ways. Thanking you in advance. 

<blockquote>quote: <hr>Originally posted by: a.hyperion If this is between two servers, you can migrate you application using the wizard and choose not to migrate the filters. If you have to copy between one server, the you can cheat the system by copying twice.<hr></blockquote> I cheat by having the server on EAS twice, once by its IP address and once by its DNS alias. EAS belives it to be two different servers and does the migration flawlessly. Then you only have to run the wizard once.

Limited filtering and graphing capabilities through Q&A for worksheet

Hi,
I've been trying Q&A with my worksheet with limited success. (I've seen it work really well on other worksheets, though.) I'm able to see a table with the default fields that I specified, but I can't do much more. If I tried to specify
filters, I get an error: Sorry, we can't access this worksheet. Try refreshing your browser. Here are the additional details:
For additional support on this problem, please contact your helpdesk with the following information: ActivityId: 30b0c393-de2c-0ef3-d92f-6d1cb5fa18c5
RequestId: cce55b79-f4d2-4512-8c0d-6dfefbb0ccb3
UTC Time: 02/04/2014 22:12:04
My worksheet is 25 MB and I want to display a calculated measure for the 75th percentile times for opening each type of web page. (There are 100 different kinds of webpages that were opened 3500 times.) Is the calculated measure causing problems? Is the
worksheet size too big? Am I hitting some kind of time out?
Thanks for any help.
Mary Beth

Hi Mary Beth,
We are looking into your issue. I'll let you know when we have more details.
Adam

Limited Photoshop Filters When Exporting From LR

I've found that I can't use the Liquify tool or many other Filters with files exported from Lightroom into Photoshop CS. I was wondering if anyone knew why I'm having this problem. I would really like to use all the Photoshop filters to finish editing my image from Lightroom.

Hi,
most of the things in CS2 are only available in 8-bit colormanagement while LR uses normally 16-bit colormanagement. Change your mode in CS2 back to 8 bit and you should have all the options again..

Audio Filters/ Render Limits

I find that I can't apply more than two audio filters to a track. After that I get a beeping noise. I have plenty of memory open, and I'm using a 2GHZ power pc and FCP HD 4.5. Anyone know how I can work this out? Thanks so much.

The beep is a render call. You can turn the beep off in preferences if you want, but you still have to render audio in order to hear it with the filters added.
Go to Sequence menu
Render
Audio for playback
You can tell it needs a render also by looking at the colored bars at the top of the timeline. The top color is for Video, the bottom for Audio. They are small, but clear.

My PE12 only has a limited number of filters, some are a white-out.

Some filters do not display. For example I use Sketch quite a bit but filters like Photocopy appear as a plain white screen. I've not counted but only about two thirds seem to be working. Any ideas anyone? {Windows 8.1, 8 Ram and separate graphics card} Thanks.

Some of the filters like under Sketch need two different colors in the toolbox.
That is the Foreground and Background colors need to be different.
Try pressing the D key to set the default colors of Black foreground and White background and see if the filters work any better.

IPC/VC: Knowledgebase/KB of ECC is not shown in CRM

Hi,
we would like to use the Variant Configuration in CRM.
Today we are using already the IPC in a standalone environment with an external system (IPC 5.0, the external system is using the IPC in the Java environment of ERP). From the same ECC System we would like to download now the knowledge bases to reuse them in CRM 7.0. All knowledge bases and runtime environments are already available. When I download the object SCE (with certain filters), I can see all those entries in table COMM_CFGKB in CRM.
Anyhow, when checking the material in CRM (e.g. commpr01 or WebUI), no knowledge base is shown!
The table COMM_CFGKB has exactly the same entries as ECC (Active = T, KB Usage 10, KBOBJNAME and Version filled etc.), but anyhow it is not shown at all in CRM. As these knowledge bases are very huge, I have tested also a very small and easy one. This one is getting downloaded the same way and has the same entries in table COMM_CFGKB and it is also visible in commpr01.
So my assumption is that the other KBs are not 100% correct. When checking them in ECC (cu36) I get many warnings and errors. Anyhow, they were downloaded to CRM (but won`t be shown). Business says that these warnings/errors are OK and that the external system which uses the IPC in ECC is not having any problems.
Question: is there any chance of using a KB in CRM which has warning/errors when it was generated in ECC?
Is there any chance of manipulating the KB before it gets imported into CRM. I have found Note 1044682 which explains a BADI.
Which tables/fields do we have to manipulate so we are able to use the KB in CRM.
As mentioned: business is aware of those errors and excepts that there might be a crash in the IPC for certain combinations.
Thx
Guido

Hi Christophe,
OK, I think I understand your suggestion: you use the same IPC with your CRM as well as with the ECC system. So in CRM you just maintain the URL and a user in XCM to the "same" IPC. You mentioned that we need to download anyway the SCE. This is somehow logical as this is the base connected to CRM, but what is not clear to me is the fact, that if the SCE KB is used via ECC all SAP R/3 fields are available (like VBTYPE of the sales order where you have values like B or C). In CRM we use the same SCE KB but here these fields are not availble as the sales order transaction customizing in CRM does not contain such a field. Where is the logical link between the values which are available in IPC and the SCE?
Thx
Guido

DLP Attachment Scanning - Size Limitations

Is it documented anywhere what the attachment file size limitations are for DLP scanning? In the ESA Configuration documentation I read:
"To scan attachments, the content scanning engine extracts the attachment for the RSA Email DLP scanning engine to scan."
Can you identify what scanning engine is referenced by "content scanning engine" and what is the maximum attachment size it can process? Also are those settings modifiable and some indcation of performance impact if they are increased to a maximum of 50 MB per attachment?
I know you can make some modifications in the DLP policy, however it is our desire to DLP scan every document sent up to our allowable maximum email size.
If large attachments cannot be scanned we may be forced to reduce our maximum message/attachment file size.
We are currently using Async O/S 7.5.1-102 and will be moving to 7.6.0 when it comes GA.

Hello David,
The content scanning engine in reference is the same AsyncOS scanning engine responsible or Message and Content Filter scanning. The maximum size of attachment to scan for this scanning engine is controlled by your 'scanconfig' setttings, as configured in the IronPort CLI. The default 'maximum size of attachment to scan' is 5MB.
IronPort1.example.com>scanconfig
There are currently 6 attachment type mappings configured to be SKIPPED.
Choose the operation you want to perform:
- NEW - Add a new entry.
- DELETE - Remove an entry.
- SETUP - Configure scanning behavior.
- IMPORT - Load mappings from a file.
- EXPORT - Save mappings to a file.
- PRINT - Display the list.
- CLEAR - Remove all entries.
- SMIME - Configure S/MIME unpacking.
[]> setup
1. Scan only attachments with MIME types or fingerprints in the list.
2. Skip attachments with MIME types or fingerprints in the list.
Choose one:
[2]>
Enter the maximum depth of attachment recursion to scan:
[5]>
Enter the maximum size of attachment to scan:
[5242880]>
<...>
Any message that is larger than this limit will be skipped by the scanning engine. This would mean that pertinent DLP policys and filters would not match that same message. Naturally, allowing larger messages to be scanned will result in performance risks, as more system resources would be required to complete the content scanning.
Regards,
-Jerry

IPC filters limitations?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for