Ironport S170 (7.5.0): Where is SOCKS proxy configuration?
Dear all
We are just just deploying our first two S170 appliances and I am not able to figure out where to set up SOCKS proxy configuration.
I am really afraid that this feature doesn't exist, although http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps10142/ps10164/aag_c45-716641.pdf states "It can proxy HTTP, HTTPs, SOCKS and native FTP traffic [...]".
So where do I have to look for the SOCKS proxy or is it really not there?
BTW, the box came with software version 7.1 and during my search for the socks feature I have tried the update-button and ended up with a software version 7.5.0-833 now.
Any hints welcome.
Grischa
OK, I have just read the announcement of version 7.7 which is supposed to include the SOCKS proxy (so prior versions does not, right?).
BUT, either the webGUI and the CLI are telling me that there are "No available upgrades".
Thus, my actual question might be this one:
Where do I find the upgrade to version 7.7?
Grischa
Similar Messages
-
Ironport S170 and Microsoft RADIUS
I'm trying to setup management logins for the IronPort S170 using RADIUS. I have the Windows server configured and the server information is in the S170, but I'm having trouble with the Group Mapping. Under the RADIUS Class Attribute, what is an example of something that would go there? Is it an AD group? If not, is it some attribute number that I need to configure on the AD user object? If so, where? TAC has no idea how to do this.
This error occurs when the user’s account is not stored in reversible encryption.
CHAP requires that the secret be available in plaintext form. CHAP cannot use irreversibly encrypted password databases that are commonly available. If the RADIUS server does not have access to the plaintext password, it cannot perform the one-way hash to verify the user and the authentication will fail. By default, Microsoft Active Directory does not store user accounts with reversible encryption.
Reversible encryption is a user class attribute and is not enabled by default in the Active Directory. You must enable this setting manually on each account or through Group Policy Objects when dealing with multiple users.
~BR
Jatin Katyal
**Do rate helpful posts** -
IronPort S170 WSA - Max file download size
Hello,
we're using an IronPort S170 WSA. Downloading big .iso (maybe other files, too) files fails. As far as I can find out, files of 2300MB or less can be downloaded, files of 3300MB or bigger fail to download (I haven't been able to try files with sizes between 2300MB - 3300MB). Using the same client without using the IronPort as a proxy, the download of the big files succeed.
The web page error message indicates:
Blocked by [companyname] Web Proxy
Category = Allowed%20URL%208080
WBRS Value = -
DVS Verdict = -
DVS Threat = -
So, I assume there is a setting in the IronPort that prevents the download of files exceeding a size limit. But I cannot find any config item that controls this. Does anyone know where this setting can be found?
Description: Cisco IronPort S170
Product: Cisco IronPort S170 Web Security Appliance
Model: S170
Version: 7.7.0-500Do you get an instant block for large files? Or does it try to download for a while, and then fails?
If it is an instant block, it should be under Web Security Manager > Access Policies. Look in the object types section.
If you are downloading for about an hour and the downloads stop, it may be authentication related.
-Vance -
Connection refused error showing in ironport s170 - WSA
Connection refused error showing in ironport s170 - WSA
I am getting “Connection refused” error while I connect ironport s170 through console cable. also i am not able to connect it through HTTP and SSH. Complete output is given below.
Last login: Thu Sep 11 07:16:59 on cuad0
Copyright (c) 2001-2011, Cisco Systems, Inc.
AsyncOS 7.5.2 for Web build 303
Welcome to the Cisco IronPort S170 Web Security Appliance
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/build/iproot/ap/ipoe/ipoe/bootstrap.py", line 55, in <module>
File "/data/lib/python2.6_7_i386_nothr/runpy.py", line 128, in _run_module_as_
main
"__main__", fname, loader, pkg_name)
File "/data/lib/python2.6_7_i386_nothr/runpy.py", line 34, in _run_code
exec code in run_globals
File "build/bdist.freebsd-7.2-RELEASE-p2-i386/egg/cli.py", line 426, in <modul
e>
File "build/bdist.freebsd-7.2-RELEASE-p2-i386/egg/external_auth/__init__.py",
line 212, in initialize
File "build/bdist.freebsd-7.2-RELEASE-p2-i386/egg/external_auth/__init__.py",
line 118, in _setup_old_authentication
File "build/bdist.freebsd-7.2-RELEASE-p2-i386/egg/command_client.py", line 674
, in quick_read_var
File "build/bdist.freebsd-7.2-RELEASE-p2-i386/egg/command_client.py", line 133
, in connect
Commandment.CommunicationError: <host name>: Network communication error
: Connection refused
AsyncOS <host name> (cuad0)
login:Hi,
You can upgrade to 7.7+ but if you require a root cause analysis I suggest you to open a TAC case.
Regards,
Luis Silva -
Occasionally we get the message that logging can’t keep up but within seconds to a minute we get a second message stating it has “caught up”.
The Critical message is:
Reporting Client: The reporting system is unable to maintain the rate of data being generated. Any new data generated will be lost.
Product: Cisco IronPort S170 Web Security Appliance
Model: S170
Version: 7.7.0-757
Serial Number: 503DE59CF1E5-FTX1602M08G
Timestamp: 23 Apr 2015 13:21:31 -0400
The Info message is:
Reporting Client: The reporting system is now able to handle new data.
Product: Cisco IronPort S170 Web Security Appliance
Model: S170
Version: 7.7.0-757
Serial Number: 503DE59CF1E5-FTX1602M08G
Timestamp: 23 Apr 2015 13:21:35 -0400
Cisco recommends upgrading appliance but funds are tight! This just started happening. Any clues for resolution??Duplicate post.
Go HERE. -
Cisco IronPort S170 Access Logs are filling up the HDD
We have a Cisco IronPort S170.
The access logs have filled the HDD to 91%
The device is taking a serious performance hit.
It now takes 5 minutes per click if I'm lucky.
I have accessed the device via FTP and am about to copy off all of our AccessLogs.
Once this is completed is there a way to wipe only the accesslogs from the device?
Via FTP the transactions seemed to be read only
I was looking through the CLI, but wasn't sure which command to use.
Thanks,
BrianWhen you FTP to the device, and CD to the appropriate directory path - are you not able to mdel the files? Are you accessing the appliance via FTP as an admin level user?
-Robert -
Bug? Socks Proxy not taking effect for SocketChannel
I find there's something not working when setting socks proxy in my java application.
In java api there's such introduction about socks proxy setting:
(from http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/net/properties.html)
SOCKS protocol support settings
The SOCKS username and password are acquired in the following way. First, if the application has registered a java.net.Authenticator default instance, then this will be queried with the protocol set to the string "SOCKS5", and the prompt set to to the string "SOCKS authentication". If the authenticator does not return a username/password or if no authenticator is registered then the system checks for the user preferences "java.net.socks.username" and "java.net.socks.password". If these preferences do not exist, then the system property "user.name" is checked for a username. In this case, no password is supplied.
socksProxyHost
socksProxyPort (default: 1080)
Indicates the name of the SOCKS proxy server and the port number that will be used by the SOCKS protocol layer. If socksProxyHost is specified then all TCP sockets will use the SOCKS proxy server to establish a connection or accept one. The SOCKS proxy server can either be a SOCKS v4 or v5 server and it has to allow for unauthenticated connections.
I am using java.nio.channels.SocketChannel to do packets trasferring, and I've caught all the packets with Ethereal, but I find there's no packets to the socks proxy.
What I use in the application is as below:
System.getProperties().setProperty("socksProxySet", "true");
System.getProperties().setProperty("socksProxyHost", socksProxyHost);
System.getProperties().setProperty("socksProxyPort", socksProxyPort);I do this above before the connection issues. The connection lines are belows:
SocketChannel s = SocketChannel.open();
InetSocketAddress addr = new InetSocketAddress("daisho.waaaghtv.com", 10383);
if (s.connect(addr)) {
System.out.println("Socks Proxy Complete!");
}else {
System.out.println("Socks Proxy Failed!");
}But every time it prints me "failed" message. I am sure that I can use the socks proxy to connect to daisho.waaaghtv.com:10383.
My shortened program is:
import java.net.InetSocketAddress;
import java.nio.channels.SocketChannel;
public class socketTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
try{
System.getProperties().setProperty("socksProxySet", "true");
System.getProperties().setProperty("socksProxyHost", "166.111.70.13");
System.getProperties().setProperty("socksProxyPort", "1080");
SocketChannel s = SocketChannel.open();
InetSocketAddress addr = new InetSocketAddress("daisho.waaaghtv.com", 10383);
if (s.connect(addr)) {
System.out.println("Socks Proxy Complete!");
}else {
System.out.println("Socks Proxy Failed!");
}catch(Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}The printed message is:
java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out: connect
at sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Native Method)
at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.connect(Unknown Source)
at socketTest.main(socketTest.java:12)I can find very limited help from internet, hope you could help me.But it's stated surely both in the 1.4 API and 1.5 API that it supports socks proxy by simply setting the system properties.
I set socksProxySet to be true because I've found it from internet, but, yup, it seems useless.
You mean the only way is to implement the socks proxy in my code? I know there is (or was, whatever) some open source project that is on this kinda topic, but ain't there a simple way? -
Where is the server configuration data stored?
Where is the server configuration data stored?
<P>
The data is stored an ASCII file named server.conf
. This file is stored in
the config directory on the same server-root as the iCS 2.0 binaries. The
format of the server.conf
file is described in detail in the Administration
Guide.Try to read
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e1959b90-0201-0010-849c-d2b1d574768b
UME user data is stored in one or more data sources. Each type of data source has its own persistence adapter. The persistence manager consults the persistence adapters when creating, reading, writing, and searching user management data. Persistence adapters for the following types of repositories are available: 1. Database: See the Product Availability Matrix on SAP Service Marketplace (http://service.sap.com/pam60) for details on which databases are supported. 2. u2022 Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) directory: See the Product Availability Matrix on SAP Service Marketplace (http://service.sap.com/pam60) for details on which directories are supported. 3. SAP Systems based on Web Application Server 6.20 You can configure UME to use one or more of these persistence devices in parallel. Users can also be stored in several different physical LDAP directory servers, or in different branches of the same LDAP directory server. -
Authenticating to Socks proxy using different accounts in a given JVM
I have a J2EE application that runs some background jobs. Each of these background jobs need to connect to an external FTP server. However, all connections must go through a central SOCKS proxy server. The SOCKS proxy server is set up to require authentication using user names and passwords. Everything works fine if I've to use this SOCKS proxy with "a set" of credentials across all background jobs. However, if I want Job1 to use "user1" for SOCKS login, and Job2 to use "user2" for SOCKS login, I can't seem to find a way to do this. I need this functionality for accounting purposes. Any help on how this can be accomplished is greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Sai PullabhotlaI tried implementing the ThreadLocal idea and I think the code is working as expected, but my proxy logs are not matching up with what the code says. Below is the code I've including a test class. See below the code for my additional comments.
import java.net.Authenticator;
import java.net.PasswordAuthentication;
* A customer authenticator for authenticating with SOCKS Proxy servers.
public class ProxyAuthenticator extends Authenticator {
* A thread local for storing the credentials to the SOCKS proxy. The Javadoc
* for ThreadLocal says they are typically used for static fields, but
* here I've a singleton instance. Hope this is not an issue.
private ThreadLocal<PasswordAuthentication> credentials = null;
* Singleton instance.
private static ProxyAuthenticator instance = null;
* Creates a new instance of <code>ProxyAuthenticator</code>. Each thread
* will have its own copy of credentials, which would be <code>null</code>
* initially. Each thread must call the <code>setCredentials</code> method
* to set the proxy credentials if needed.
private ProxyAuthenticator() {
credentials = new ThreadLocal<PasswordAuthentication>() {
@Override
protected PasswordAuthentication initialValue() {
System.out.println("ThreadLocal initialized for "
+ Thread.currentThread().getName());
return null;
@Override
public void set(PasswordAuthentication value) {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " SET");
super.set(value);
@Override
public PasswordAuthentication get() {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " GET");
return super.get();
* Returns the singleton instance of this class.
* @return the singleton instance of this class.
public static synchronized ProxyAuthenticator getInstance() {
if (instance == null) {
instance = new ProxyAuthenticator();
return instance;
* Sets the proxy creditials. This method updates the ThreadLocal variable.
* @param user
* the user name
* @param password
* the password
public void setCredentials(String user, String password) {
credentials.set(new PasswordAuthentication(user, password.toCharArray()));
@Override
public PasswordAuthentication getPasswordAuthentication() {
System.out.println("Requesting host: " + this.getRequestingHost());
System.out.println("Requesting port: " + this.getRequestingPort());
System.out.println("Requesting protocol: "
+ this.getRequestingProtocol());
System.out.println("Requesting prompt: " + this.getRequestingPrompt());
System.out.println("Requesting scheme: " + this.getRequestingScheme());
System.out.println("Requesting site: " + this.getRequestingSite());
System.out.println("Requesting URL: " + this.getRequestingURL());
System.out.println("Requestor type: " + this.getRequestorType());
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()
+ " Authenitcator returning credentials "
+ credentials.get().getUserName() + ":"
+ new String(credentials.get().getPassword()));
return credentials.get();
import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.BufferedWriter;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.io.OutputStreamWriter;
import java.net.Authenticator;
import java.net.InetSocketAddress;
import java.net.Proxy;
import java.net.Socket;
import java.net.Proxy.Type;
* A test class for testing the {@link ProxyAuthenticator}.
public class SocksProxyTest implements Runnable {
* Socks proxy host, used by the FakeFtpClient
private static final String SOCKS_PROXY_HOST = "192.168.1.240";
* Target FTP host to connect to
private String host = null;
* Proxy user
private String proxyUser = null;
* Proxy password
private String proxyPassword = null;
* Creates a new instance of <code>SocksProxyTest</code>
* @param host
* the target FTP host
* @param proxyUser
* proxy user
* @param proxyPassword
* proxy password
public SocksProxyTest(String host, String proxyUser, String proxyPassword) {
this.host = host;
this.proxyUser = proxyUser;
this.proxyPassword = proxyPassword;
public void run() {
// Create the FakeFtpClient
FakeFtpClient test = new FakeFtpClient(host, 21, proxyUser,
proxyPassword);
for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++) {
try {
test.connect();
test.disconnect();
// Thread.sleep(10000);
catch (Throwable t) {
t.printStackTrace();
* Test run.
* @param args
* command line arguments
* @throws IOException
* propagated
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
// Get the singleton instance of the ProxyAuthenticator.
ProxyAuthenticator authenticator = ProxyAuthenticator.getInstance();
// Update the default authenticator to our ProxyAuthenticator
Authenticator.setDefault(authenticator);
// Array of FTP hosts we want to connect to
final String[] ftpHosts = { "192.168.1.53", "192.168.1.54",
"192.168.1.55" };
// Proxy login/user names to connect to each of the above hosts
final String[] users = { "User-001", "User-002", "User-003" };
// Proxy passwords for each of the above user names (in this case
// password == username).
final String[] passwords = users;
// For each target FTP host
for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
// Create the SocksProxyTest instance with the target host, proxy
// user and proxy password
SocksProxyTest spt = new SocksProxyTest(ftpHosts, users[i],
passwords[i]);
// Create a new thread and start it
Thread t = new Thread(spt);
t.setName("T" + (i + 1));
try {
t.join();
catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
t.start();
* A fake FTP client. The connect method connects to the given host, reads
* the first line the server sends. Does nothing else. The disconnect method
* closes the socket.
private static class FakeFtpClient {
* The FTP host
private String host = null;
* The FTP port
private int port = 0;
* Proxy login/user name
private String proxyUser = null;
* Proxy password
private String proxyPassword = null;
* Socket to the target host
private Socket s = null;
* Creates a new instance of <code>FakeFtpClient</code>
* @param host
* the FTP host
* @param port
* the FTP port
* @param proxyUser
* Proxy user
* @param proxyPassword
* Proxy password
public FakeFtpClient(String host, int port, String proxyUser,
String proxyPassword) {
this.host = host;
this.port = port;
this.proxyUser = proxyUser;
this.proxyPassword = proxyPassword;
* Connects to the target FTP host through the specified Socks proxy and
* proxy authentication. Reads the first line of the welcome message.
* @throws IOException
* propagated
public void connect() throws IOException {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()
+ " Connecting to " + host + " ...");
// Update the ProxyAuthenticator with the correct credentials for
// this thread
ProxyAuthenticator.getInstance().setCredentials(proxyUser,
proxyPassword);
s = new Socket(new Proxy(Type.SOCKS, new InetSocketAddress(
SOCKS_PROXY_HOST, 1080)));
s.setSoTimeout(10000);
s.connect(new InetSocketAddress(host, port), 10000);
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " Connected");
BufferedWriter writer = new BufferedWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(
s.getOutputStream()));
BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(
s.getInputStream()));
System.out.println(reader.readLine());
* Closes the socket.
public void disconnect() {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()
+ " Disconnecting...");
if (s != null) {
try {
s.close();
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()
+ " Disconnected");
catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
Looking at the test class, it creates 3 threads T1, T2 and T3. T1 is setup to connect to 192.168.1.53 using a proxy user User-001 and T2 is setup to connect to 192.168.1.54 using proxy user User-002 and T3 connects to 192.168.1.55 using proxy user User-003.
Each thread then loops 5 times to connect to their target servers and disconnect each time. All the debug (System.out) statements indicate that the getPasswordAuthentication is returning the correct credentials for each thread. However, when I look at the logs on the proxy server, the results are different and arbitrary.
Below is the proxy log:
[2011-01-24 11:10:11] 192.168.1.240 User-001 SOCKS5 CONNECT 192.168.1.54:21
[2011-01-24 11:10:11] 192.168.1.240 User-002 SOCKS5 CONNECT 192.168.1.53:21
[2011-01-24 11:10:11] 192.168.1.240 User-002 SOCKS5 CONNECT 192.168.1.55:21
[2011-01-24 11:10:11] 192.168.1.240 User-003 SOCKS5 CONNECT 192.168.1.55:21
[2011-01-24 11:10:11] 192.168.1.240 User-003 SOCKS5 CONNECT 192.168.1.55:21
[2011-01-24 11:10:11] 192.168.1.240 User-003 SOCKS5 CONNECT 192.168.1.55:21
[2011-01-24 11:10:11] 192.168.1.240 User-003 SOCKS5 CONNECT 192.168.1.55:21
[2011-01-24 11:10:11] 192.168.1.240 User-003 SOCKS5 CONNECT 192.168.1.54:21
[2011-01-24 11:10:11] 192.168.1.240 User-002 SOCKS5 CONNECT 192.168.1.53:21
[2011-01-24 11:10:12] 192.168.1.240 User-001 SOCKS5 CONNECT 192.168.1.54:21
[2011-01-24 11:10:12] 192.168.1.240 User-002 SOCKS5 CONNECT 192.168.1.53:21
[2011-01-24 11:10:12] 192.168.1.240 User-001 SOCKS5 CONNECT 192.168.1.54:21
[2011-01-24 11:10:12] 192.168.1.240 User-002 SOCKS5 CONNECT 192.168.1.53:21
[2011-01-24 11:10:12] 192.168.1.240 User-001 SOCKS5 CONNECT 192.168.1.54:21
[2011-01-24 11:10:13] 192.168.1.240 User-002 SOCKS5 CONNECT 192.168.1.53:21
As you can see from the first line in the log, the proxy says User-001 connected to 192.168.1.54, but the code should always connect to 192.168.1.53 with user User-001.
Any idea on what might be going on? -
Using Content Engine for SOCKS Proxy
We have a CE566 integrated with an ICAP server in a proxy role for our network.
we are experiencing issues with a Java applet that many of our users use with an outside vendor.
Here are the test results from Sun's Java J2RE development team who we're working with:
The trace log shows SOCKET connections via ports 80 and 443
failed.
network: Connecting socket://server.domain.com:80 with proxy=SOCKS @
/1.2.3.4:8080
[SimpleConnection] userloginname: connect attempt failed
network: Connecting socket://server.domain.com:443 with proxy=SOCKS
@ /1.2.3.4:8080
[SimpleConnection] userloginname: connect attempt failed
network: Connecting socket://server.domain.com:80 with proxy=SOCKS @
/1.2.3.4:8080
[SimpleConnection] userloginname: connect attempt failed
network: Connecting socket://server.domain.com:443 with proxy=SOCKS
@ /1.2.3.4:8080
[SimpleConnection] userloginname: connect attempt failed
Does anyone have any information in regards to using the CE as a proxy in this regards? I have obviously found command language for http; https; and ftp - but nothing for other methodsThe site he's accessing required SOCKS proxy. The ACNS does not support SOCKS.
-
Arch as a router... through a socks proxy
I have my arch box acting as a gateway on my local network, is it possible to tunnel all the traffic that goes through the box through a socks proxy?
I want to be able to proxy things like my phone and xbox
Thanks!You want to utilize an upstream SOCKS proxy? I doubt it, you'd be better off setting up a VPN and routing your outbound traffic through that.
-
Mail.app in 10.4.7: SOCKS proxy issues again...
Hi,
Today I've updated my PowerBook to MacOS X 10.4.7. All the process was fine, but Mail didn't connect to any server. After reading some posts in this forum I've unmarked the SOCKS proxy settings in the Network pref. pane, and I've recovered the 10.4.6 functionallity. So at least I can work.
When I'm at office, we have an Exchange server with direct access in the network ( is because this that proxy is not needed ). Also a proxy server controls the Internet access.
What is not working in Mail ( or I don't know how to use it ) now is the following:
- Local access to Exchange server is only possible using a POP account. An Exchange account doesn't work because is always asking the password.
- I need to disable the SOCKS proxy to be able to access the local mail server. So the 'Bypass proxy settings' in the Network preference pane seems to not work ( I've tried all kind of syntaxs: *.domain, server.domain, IP address, etc. )
- With the SOCKS proxy settings active in my corporate network, I cannot access external mail accounts in external servers. I've tried IMAP and POP accounts with the same result: nothing. This is the same issue than in previous version of Mail.app.
So waiting again for a Mail patch...
Regards,
Joan B. Altadill
PowerBook 17 Mac OS X (10.4.6) 10.4.7 !!!!!
PowerBook 17 Mac OS X (10.4.6) 10.4.7 !!!!!Hi,
Today I've updated my PowerBook to MacOS X 10.4.7. All the process was fine, but Mail didn't connect to any server. After reading some posts in this forum I've unmarked the SOCKS proxy settings in the Network pref. pane, and I've recovered the 10.4.6 functionallity. So at least I can work.
When I'm at office, we have an Exchange server with direct access in the network ( is because this that proxy is not needed ). Also a proxy server controls the Internet access.
What is not working in Mail ( or I don't know how to use it ) now is the following:
- Local access to Exchange server is only possible using a POP account. An Exchange account doesn't work because is always asking the password.
- I need to disable the SOCKS proxy to be able to access the local mail server. So the 'Bypass proxy settings' in the Network preference pane seems to not work ( I've tried all kind of syntaxs: *.domain, server.domain, IP address, etc. )
- With the SOCKS proxy settings active in my corporate network, I cannot access external mail accounts in external servers. I've tried IMAP and POP accounts with the same result: nothing. This is the same issue than in previous version of Mail.app.
So waiting again for a Mail patch...
Regards,
Joan B. Altadill
PowerBook 17 Mac OS X (10.4.6) 10.4.7 !!!!!
PowerBook 17 Mac OS X (10.4.6) 10.4.7 !!!!! -
In general, Where is AddOn local configuration stored?
Hi Experts,
In general, Where is AddOn local configuration stored?
I am using an AddOn, I have a local network and Windows 2008 Terminal Server (TS). I installed this AddOn in three companies from a LAN PC, and its working fine there from local computer but not in the TS. In Terminal Server just works in two companies but not in the third one. In the third one appears under AddOn Administration, it is assigned to the company and to the user but when I go to the AddOn Manager It does not appear in pending AddOns neither in installed AddOns, so I am not able to start it.
Any ideas, Is there a file that holds the local AddOn configuration that I can I just can modify in order to establish the same parameters that SAP is using for the other companies?
Which files, registry keys and tables are involved in AddOn configuration?
ThanksIt would store in C:\Program Files\SAP\SAP Business One\ AddOnsLocalRegistration for a particular client machine.
Delete the file following <AddOn Exe and ends with AddOn></ADDONS> which you have installed previously.
Reinstall your add-on definitely it will work. -
Socks proxy call from a weblogic server across the firewall to an external program
Hi,
From our weblogic server, we are trying to connect to an external
program outside our firewall through SSL. The SSL connection is being
tunneled through a socks proxy in the DMZ. (We have not yet made it
work so far. Currently, we are trying to make it work)
From the weblogic bean, we are doing the following
System.setProperty("socksProxySet", "true");
System.setProperty("socksProxyHost", "w.x.y.z");
System.setProperty("socksProxyPort", "1080");
Not that weblogic bean is the initiator of the connection and it talks
to a program outside our firewall.
My question is, will this kind of system level setting in the weblogic
server have any negative impact? This is because, RMI is over sockets
and weblogic might be talking to its internal components through
sockets.
Is it advisable to have such socks related setting the weblogic bean
level?
thanks,
jas.Hi,
From our weblogic server, we are trying to connect to an external
program outside our firewall through SSL. The SSL connection is being
tunneled through a socks proxy in the DMZ. (We have not yet made it
work so far. Currently, we are trying to make it work)
From the weblogic bean, we are doing the following
System.setProperty("socksProxySet", "true");
System.setProperty("socksProxyHost", "w.x.y.z");
System.setProperty("socksProxyPort", "1080");
Not that weblogic bean is the initiator of the connection and it talks
to a program outside our firewall.
My question is, will this kind of system level setting in the weblogic
server have any negative impact? This is because, RMI is over sockets
and weblogic might be talking to its internal components through
sockets.
Is it advisable to have such socks related setting the weblogic bean
level?
thanks,
jas. -
Is it possible to use a socks proxy with a Google Talk iChat account? I see the option for the AIM account but it's missing for Google Talk. I'm using iChat 4.0.7.
Hi,
What I posted above is the extent of my knowledge on Proxies.
The GoogleTalk Site might be the best place to look up any info on a Proxy Login to their Server.
9:32 PM Monday; January 12, 2009
Maybe you are looking for
-
I seem to have Ongoing permission repair problems; I repair them (and there's lots to repair) and then not even a week or two later I check permissions and again huge repair job needed. Any idea why this keeps happening? Am I chasing symptom of large
-
Application iDB Datamaster Pro
Please review and approve the new app update "iDB Datamaster - Pro" Version 1.2, by Evince Technologies, Inc as soon as possible. All of the customers of Version 1.1.3 are enraged by it's failure to run under iPhone OS4. The makers claim that they ha
-
Sharing photo libraries with multiple users
Can I set my imac up so that my photo library is shared between the multiple users on the computer? If so, how do I do it?
-
Why does Photoshop Elements 11 uninstall every time after my computer has been shut down/restarted?
Every time my computer is shut down and I go to use photoshop, I have to reinstall the program completely. The icon is still on my computer screen but it's not downloaded. Please help!!!
-
Hi, I am working with oracle 10g. Still i was not familiar with PLSQL Tables or collections. Please send me the link or any notes regarding PLSQL Tables. Thanks and Regards, Ansaf.