Is a corrupted file the version or the master file?

Hi,
When a version was created from a master/RAW file and it gets corrupted, what got corrupted? In other words, can we go back to the master?
I often create duplicate versions of important images in case one gets corrupted - and it's easier than going back to TM to retrieve an earlier file, but I am beginning to wonder whether I am kidding myself.
Thanks,
Raphael

Raphael, that depends.
When a version was created from a master/RAW file and it gets corrupted, what got corrupted? In other words, can we go back to the master?
If you see a corrupted version, the chances are high, the original image is corrupted, and thus a corrupted version is computed. You should be able to see this by toggling between original master file and version (press the "M" key). The version is not stored as an actual image file, it is a set of instructions on how to create the version image file by applying adjustments to the original image. These may get corrupted too, if Aperture crashes while writing these instructions. Then you can usually repair this by repairing you Aperture library with the first aid tools. Aperture 3 User Manual: Repairing and Rebuilding Your Aperture Library
Or just discard the version and revert to the original image by using the command "Photos > Revert to original".
To protect yourself against the original images getting corrupted, it is highly recommended to backup your origininal image files right from the card, even before importing to Aperture. Aperture provides a setting to create an backup of the originals while importing. Keep these in a safe place, n addition to your Time Machine backup. But it is not necessary, IMHO, to import the images in duplicates. Then both copies will be on the same disk, and if your disk fails, has bad blocks, etc. both copies might get corrupted at the same time.
Regards
Léonie

Similar Messages

How do you know the version of a JAR file ?

how do you know the version of a JAR file ?
is it what is written on MANIFEST.MF ?
for example i have a JAR file
whose MANIFEST.MF has this
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Created-By: Ant 1.4.1so, whats the version of this JAR ? 1.0 ?

anyway, that was JSTL..jar.
Now, come to another JAR file....
whose MANIFEST.MF has......
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Created-By: Apache Ant 1.5.1
Extension-Name: Struts Framework
Specification-Title: Struts Framework
Specification-Vendor: Apache Software Foundation
Specification-Version: 1.1
Implementation-Title: Struts Framework
Implementation-Vendor: Apache Software Foundation
Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.apache
Implementation-Version: 1.1
Class-Path: commons-beanutils.jar commons-collections.jar commons-dig
ester.jar commons-logging.jar commons-validator.jar jakarta-oro.jar s
truts-legacy.jarso, How do you believe whats the version now ? do u go with the comment "Manifest-Version: 1.0" or "Specification-Version: 1.1" ?
definitely, you would go with the "Specification-Version: 1.1" and declare this JAR as STRUTS 1.1
hmmm, so, if nothing is mentioned like above should we follow the MANIFEST version as the JSTL version ? in my earlier example i did not find any comment on ""Specification-Version" ......so , if anybody gives me that JAR , how do i decide whether its 1.0 specification or 1.1 specifucation compliant ?
can you tell whats the JSTL version of my earler example JAR file ?

How can I check the version of the rdf file?

Dear all:
How can I check the version of the rdf file? such like CEXRECRE.rdf .
my environment is : oracle 11.5.9
platform : Linux red hat 4.0
Regards
Terry

Terry,
Use "adident" or "strings -a" commands -- See (Note: 125922.1 - How To Find Oracle Application File Versions) for details.
Thanks,
Hussein

Specifying the version of dependent jar file?

Hi all
At the moment I am fighting with some class loading issues in a J2EE Appcontainer... Acutally the app server uses a different version of a jar file than my application.. Now the classloader always uses
the already loaded classes of the AppServers jar Version instead of those that I want..
I have my application together with the dependent jar packaged together into one jar file... In the manifest I lsit the dependency...
Now my question is if its possible to explicitly state the version of the package that my jar is dependent of...
Any help would be appreciated
regards
tom

Vijay
Acutally I just read through the thread. Actually what I am working on is an J2EE App Containing a couple of EJB (2.0) components in different jars, some utility jars and 2 Wars. All this is packaged together into an ear.
Now Actually the basic structure is like:
Ear
--> WAR1
--> webinf containing classes and manifest with dependent jars
--> War2
--> EJB Jar
--> metinf containing deployment desc and manifest where the manifest references JDom-b10.jar on the classpath
--> Also conatiner JDom-b10.jar
Acutally the JDom.jar is already loaded by the Application Server (Jboss 3.2.3) in its bootstrap loader... I need to have the b10 as otherwise some other 3rd Party stuff of the Ejb is not running...
Now I expected the classloader to prefer the direct deployment unit against all parents and delegating loader... but it doesnt:
15:17:04,011 INFO [STDOUT]
org.jdom.Document(1bb8ea).ClassLoader=org.jboss.system.server.NoAnnotationURLClassLoader@e3b895
..org.jboss.system.server.NoAnnotationURLClassLoader@e3b895
..sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader@e80a59
....file:/C:/Entwicklungstools/jboss-3.2.3_tomcat-4.1.24/bin/
....file:/C:/Entwicklungstools/abaXX/components36/lib/3rdparty/oracle9iR2.jar
....file:/C:/Entwicklungstools/j2sdk_1.4.2_03/lib/tools.jar
....file:/C:/Entwicklungstools/jboss-3.2.3_tomcat-4.1.24/bin/run.jar
..sun.misc.Launcher$ExtClassLoader@1ff5ea7
....file:/C:/Entwicklungstools/j2sdk_1.4.2_03/jre/lib/ext/dnsns.jar
....file:/C:/Entwicklungstools/j2sdk_1.4.2_03/jre/lib/ext/ldapsec.jar
....file:/C:/Entwicklungstools/j2sdk_1.4.2_03/jre/lib/ext/localedata.jar
....file:/C:/Entwicklungstools/j2sdk_1.4.2_03/jre/lib/ext/sunjce_provider.jar
++++CodeSource: (file:/C:/Entwicklungstools/jboss-3.2.3_tomcat-4.1.24/lib/jdom.jar <no certificates>)
Implemented Interfaces:
++interface java.io.Serializable(f62373)
++++ClassLoader: null
++++Null CodeSource
++interface java.lang.Cloneable(13e8d89)
++++ClassLoader: null
++++Null CodeSource
This above is a small JBoss utility acutally printing out the watched URLs of the CL and the Codesource of a class... .. Now actually the classloader shouldn't use the Jdom.jar mentioned as source but the one listed here:
15:16:24,308 INFO [EJBDeployer] nested deployment: file:/C:/Entwicklungstools/jboss-3.2.3_tomcat-4.1.24/server/tebs/tmp/deploy/tmp27652tebs-0.1-SNAPSHOT.e
ar-contents/tebs-migration-0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar-contents/jdom-b10.jar
Actually I think the problem is pretty close to the thread you mentioned before... AFAIK the classloaders in J2EE Containers have to prefer the direct deployment unit (in this case the jar and its content) to any other parent class loaders files... I also thought that there can be mulitple versions of a class file in one VM an that the appserver has to preserve every app from using a class of another app... So that there is some housing principles....
As I could not figure out how to solve this I came to the question regarding versioning... As both JDom.jars contain version information this would solve my probem... But as you already mentioned AFAIK there is only support to give some verision informationen about a jar in the manifest but nothing mentions that you can explicitely request a specific version.
So If anyone has a clou how I get that crapp working I would be very thankful
Tom

Why don't the Adobe Acrobat 10.1.6 and Adobe Reader 9.5.4 patches update the version on the exe file

Why don't the Adobe Acrobat 10.1.6 and Adobe Reader 9.5.4 patches update the version on the exe file ? My vulnerability reports show these installations are not patched when they really are.

Hi All,
I also facing the same issue with Adobe reader 9.5.4 version update.
Previous Version installed: 9.5.3
AcroRd32.exe - File Version 9.5.3.305
AcroRd32.dll - File version 9.5.3.305
After update installation to 9.5.4, add or remove program shows latest version but exe and dll is not updated. Vulnerability assessment tools based on file version check identifies patch is still missing. Becomes a HEAD ACHE.
Adobe Reader 9 > Help > About Adobe Reader 9 - First shows version 9.5.4, if your click on it instead of showing AGM version next it shows version 9.5.3.305.
I tested for all previous versions of 9x, works fine in each update. Seems like patch is missing codes for updating file versions.
Waiting for an acknowledgement.

I have a tesco router and an external hard drive attached to it as a network drive (shared) for my macbook and MB-Air. Have no problems with my MB accessing it, but with MB-AIR it says - 'the version of the server you are trying to connect to is not supp

I have a tesco router and an external hard drive attached to it as a network drive (shared) for my macbook and MB-Air. Have no problems with my MB accessing it, but with MB-AIR it says - 'the version of the server you are trying to connect to is not supported. pls contact your system administrator to resolve the problem'. MB-Air uses maverick downloaded yesterday - upgrade from mountain lion. MB uses snow leopard still, as i am quite used to it and am thinking of upgrade if mavericks work fine on air. Also have parallel on snow leopard but it is no longer supported according to mac website - if i upgrade am i going to lose my parallel and will have to buy a new one!!!

Yes, the Old Master file has a folder for each year where I find all photos from that specific year. I am attaching a screen shot of the file.
In the meantime i have managed to download all photos (it did not download any video files though in mpg, avi, 3gp, m4v,mp4 and mov format) to a new iphoto library. Unfortunately the photos are quite mixed and often doubled up. I ma considering to purchase iphoto library which checks all duplicates in iphoto. this will save me a lot of time. What do you think?

Blackberry 10 the data isn't compatible with the version of the device software that you are currently running

Hi,
my update to 10.3.1.1565 messed the handwriting input up on my phone. so I tried to downgrade to 10.2.1, upon doing so all my files were wiped, however I thought I was being smart by doing a complete backup this morning while running 10.3.1.1565 prior to attempting the os downgrade to 10.2.1 using BlackBerry Link,
Anyway I had to restore my device back to 10.3.1.1565 and now when I attempt to do a restore using the .bbb ( backup ) which I created earlier on today i.e getting the following error message:
blackberry 10 the data isn't compatible with the version of the device software that you are currently running
the software versions on my phone now and the software version when I did my backup are exactly the same 10.3.1.1565. I'm able to restore my user files and apps ect, as it offers to do a partial restore,., but my contacts, and remember files are now gone. I NEED THESE. how do I get these back..
please help..
Thanks,
GeoYeo - Free Local classifieds - Built for Blackberry 10, if you like it please Rate It and Share it!
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi,
I figured it out. so I figured I would post. Apparently BlackBerry pulled the 10.3.1.1565 update. anway not sure what happened butI ended up usng Shenshi and grabbing an update from a different carrier, upon doing so I am now able to do a complete restore using my old BBB file,
GeoYeo - Free Local classifieds - Built for Blackberry 10, if you like it please Rate It and Share it!

Fix for "The version of the server you are trying to connect to is not supported."

Like many of you, I experienced the following problem with Lion:
"The version of the server you are trying to connect to is not supported. Please contact your system administrator to resolve the problem."
I googled and found a workaround for that. It worked for me, maybe worth a try:
http://www.alexanderwilde.com/2011/04/os-x-lion-connection-error-with-afp-and-wo rkaround/
Koos

Same problem here, and the above fixes do not work. I'm running 10.7.5, and the defaults write commands do not appear to work: the plist reverts to its default state after each connection attempt.
I can confirm that the correct values are entered in the plist immediately after performing the defauts write commands (while logged in as root) described in those links, by opening the plist file in xcode. But regardless of rebooting or not, the file immediately reverts to its default values as soon as an afp connection is made. Extremely frustrating. The "defaults write" simply doesn't stick.
I desperately need to pull some data off of a Mac IIci that is running Shareway IP under System 7.5.5. This always worked seamlessly in 10.4 though 10.6: I really need a working solution for 10.7. Thanks for any help...

Is there a way to get the version of the C++ coherence library

Hi,
I've noticed that the API for the PofExtractor class has changed from 3.5.1 to 3.5.2. It does break binary compatibility so I need a way to know if I'm loading the right dll.
Is there a way to get the version of the C++ coherence library? I've been unable to find a "getVersion" like function in the C++ headers...

Hi Serge,
It sounds like you are looking for a way to do this at runtime, which unfortunately we do not have. We do have an existing enhancement request (COH-2399) to add this support, but it is currently not available.
You can check the library version externally in a few ways however:
- run "sanka -version", using the sanka.exe tool shipped with coherence, it will print out the version string of the coherence DLL it loads
- use the standard UNIX "what" command supplying it the shared library, and it will do the same, even on Windows
You could in fact write your own version of 'what' in a function and then do things programatically. Here is the description from the 'what' man page.
what reads each file name and searches for sequences of the form
``@(#)'', as inserted by the source code control system. It prints the
remainder of the string following this marker, up to a null character,
newline, double quote, or ``> character.''
So basically scan the library binary for the pattern and you'll find the version string.
Regarding PofExtractor, it was unfortunate we had to break backwards compatibility, it is not something we do often, or take lightly. Please note that we did it in such a way to still retain on the wire compatibility, so if that is the reason for your question you should be able to simply not worry about it.
thanks,
Mark
Oracle Coherence

Problems upgrading the version of the operating system to Maverick.

Hello everyone and thanks for your help.
I'm trying to update the version of the OS X operating system to Maverick, also download the latest version of XCode and every time I try to do I get the following error:
15/04/14 16:56:35,507 ReceiptInstaller[482]: 3891612: (CGSLookupServerRootPort) Untrusted apps are not allowed to connect to or launch Window Server before login.
15/04/14 16:56:35,507 ReceiptInstaller[482]: kCGErrorRangeCheck: On-demand launch of the Window Server is allowed for root user only.
15/04/14 16:56:35,508 ReceiptInstaller[482]: CGSLookupServerRootPort: Failed to look up the port for "com.apple.windowserver.active" (1100)
15/04/14 16:56:35,512 ReceiptInstaller[482]: kCGErrorRangeCheck: On-demand launch of the Window Server is allowed for root user only.
15/04/14 16:56:35,512 ReceiptInstaller[482]: CGSLookupServerRootPort: Failed to look up the port for "com.apple.windowserver.active" (1100)
15/04/14 16:56:35,845 sandboxd[483]: ([482]) ReceiptInstaller(482) deny file-read-data /private/var/root/Library/Preferences/.GlobalPreferences.plist
15/04/14 16:56:35,933 sandboxd[483]: ([482]) ReceiptInstaller(482) deny file-read-data /Library/Preferences/.GlobalPreferences.plist
15/04/14 16:56:35,947 sandboxd[483]: ([482]) ReceiptInstaller(482) deny mach-lookup com.apple.windowserver.active
15/04/14 16:56:35,953 sandboxd[483]: ([482]) ReceiptInstaller(482) deny mach-lookup com.apple.windowserver.active
What should I do?

Hola Jose,
is this happening with a certain command or with all of them?.
Basically seems like connection is timing out.. so make sure that the host were the command is running is reachable. Also you can find more info about the problem in the SAPXPG logs.... I had a similar issue in the past and i solve it by updating the version of SAPXPG on the sap kernel.
Regards
Juan

HANA Studio installation error: Error getting the version of the native layer: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no sapjco3 in java.library.path

When attempting to add the ADT to HANA Studio I get the error:
Error getting the version of the native layer: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no sapjco3 in java.library.path
Additionally I get something about a possibly missing Microsoft Runtime DLL VS2010.
When I then attempt to add ABAP Projects I get the error:
An error has occurred. See error log for more details.
com/sap/mw/jco3/eclipse/Registry
I have tried with sites:
SAP Development Tools for Eclipse - Juno Software Repository
SAP Development Tools for Eclipse - Kepler Software Repository
I have been able to install the ADT on Eclipse-Kepler which is running fine.

I did and on that page the following is stated:
For Windows OS: DLLs VS2010 for communication with the back-end system is required.
NOTE: Install either the x86 or the x64 variant, accordingly to your 32- or 64-Bit Eclipse installation.
This seems exactly to address the issue I am grapling with, but when downloading and trying to install the file I get the message that the current version on my frontend is more recent than the version I am trying to install.
Is that not strange?

I've just updated my iPad to iOS 7.02 and I'm not able now to download new apps nor update the version of the existing ones.

Hi!
I've just updated my iPad to iOS 7.02 and I'm not able now to download new apps nor update the version of the existing ones. All of them are "waiting"... for ever.Even, when trying to download a new app, a "dratf" icon appears on the ipad, not the app's own icon...
I've tried to switch off and on the iPad, disconnect and reconnect the itunes id... and nothing works. Even deleting an app, to download it again, doesn't work. It even doesn't ask for my password!!! (Stays with the small square with a circle around, the one that gets "bolder" while downloading... but it doesn't get bolder now. Just stay...).
Any suggestions? I wouldn't like to reset the iPad, since I've got data in some apps that I wouldn't like lo loose...
By the way, I can not either delete some apps with thos "draft" icons... even when the alert that appears when trying to do that is shown and select "ok".
Thank you in advance!
Best Regards,
Carlos.

Hi,
Thank you, Once_was_lost, but it doesn't work either. I tried it yesterday as an option (I think you're referring to the options of those apps in the settings app).
The problems are still here... I've been able to update some apps using the PC itunes (connecting the app to it), but all the other apps are still "wating", and I have two new strange things:
* I cannnot remove the apps that are downloading (at least those that are supposed to be downolading ) . But I could remove one from the PC... and now there is an "empty line" in the "to update apps list".
* Stranger: though I cannot download new apps or music from the store, I can do in-app purchases!!! In that case, I'm asked for the password and the item downloads. How is it possible?????
I can download with the same user in the PC, in the iPhone... but not in the iPad .
I'm getting mad...

I get a message that tells me when I try to connect my Ipad 1 to the computer, that I have to download a newer version. The version on the computer is deleted twice, and a new version is downloaded, but it still doesn`t work. What to do?

Is there anybody out there who can tell me what I`m doing wrong? I`ve just bought this Ipad1, mostly for the kids to play with, but I still want it to work properly.
I first got the message that apple mobile device wasn`t activated. I did activate, and now I get the message that I have to download a never version of iTunes. The version on the computer is the newest, but what`s on my Ipad? No clue. But it`s updatet to the newest IOS 5, so i guess iTunes is updated too?? Or?
Anything I can do to fix this? It`s pretty annoying if I can say so...!
Regards

There's a couple of ways to get through to the authorisation controls in the 11.0.x versions.
The control is still in the Store menu, but first (if you're using iTunes versions 11.0.x) you might need to bring up the menu bar to see the Store menu.
If you're using 11.0.x, click on the wee boxy icon up in the top-left corner of your iTunes to see the "Show Menu Bar" control, as per the following screenshot:
Then you'll find the control in the Store menu:
Alternatively, if you don't want to bring up the menu bar, it's still possible to get into the authorise controls via nested menus accessible from the wee boxy icon. Here's a screenshot of where to find them:

How do you reset the version on the ipod

I have a 30g ipod photo and a 30g ipod video. This is my issue, my photo has version 1.2.1. I have a pioneer navi unit with ipod control and it can no longer read my ipod. My video ipod still works and it has version 1.1.1 on it. I reseted my photo ipod but it does not update the version on the ipod. I have also tried to download the old updater but since i have itunes 7, it will not work. What should I do? Install the original software on another PC and hope that itunes 6 and an old updater will work or will the new sowftware on the ipod override the installation of the old software? I really do not want to upload 3000 plus songs again and I am afraid to update my video ipod because it's the only one that works.

Gee, I really am sorry I ticked you off tonight. I know that 1600/40=40 but the reason why I put this discussion up in the first place is because my calculator wasn't working, NOT because I wanted to start a fight. Unless you know how to reset the calculator, back off Mr. Knowitall. >=P

"The version of the Player that you are trying to install is lower than what is currently installed" when installing 14.0.0.176

I've been deploying flash updates thru SCCM for a long time using the MSI. With this update, many computers updated successfully, but about 200+ of them failed. Each computer I have looked at has the message "Product: Adobe Flash Player 14 ActiveX -- The version of the Player that you are trying to install is lower than what is currently installed." in event viewer. Attempting a manual install of the MSI produces a similar interactive message. The current installed version is definitely older than the one I am attempting to install. I am only able to re-mediate by manually uninstalling, and then installing 14.0.0.176. I could script and deploy an uninstaller, but I would rather the bug with the MSI be fixed.

Dear María,
Finally, I have been able to reproduce the error, both in ActiveX and plugin installers updating from version 15.0.0.246.
Here you have the logs:
ACTIVEX
=== Verbose logging started: 18/12/2014 16:12:54 Build type: SHIP UNICODE 5.00.7601.00 Calling process: C:\WINDOWS\system32\msiexec.exe ===
MSI (c) (E0:1C) [16:12:54:137]: Resetting cached policy values
MSI (c) (E0:1C) [16:12:54:137]: Machine policy value 'Debug' is 0
MSI (c) (E0:1C) [16:12:54:137]: ******* RunEngine:
           ******* Product: install_flash_player_16_active_x.msi
           ******* Action:
           ******* CommandLine: **********
MSI (c) (E0:1C) [16:12:54:138]: Client-side and UI is none or basic: Running entire install on the server.
MSI (c) (E0:1C) [16:12:54:138]: Grabbed execution mutex.
MSI (c) (E0:1C) [16:12:54:155]: Cloaking enabled.
MSI (c) (E0:1C) [16:12:54:155]: Attempting to enable all disabled privileges before calling Install on Server
MSI (c) (E0:1C) [16:12:54:158]: Incrementing counter to disable shutdown. Counter after increment: 0
MSI (s) (30:E4) [16:12:54:162]: Running installation inside multi-package transaction C:\WINDOWS\system32\install_flash_player_16_active_x.msi
MSI (s) (30:E4) [16:12:54:162]: Grabbed execution mutex.
MSI (s) (30:4C) [16:12:54:163]: Resetting cached policy values
MSI (s) (30:4C) [16:12:54:163]: Machine policy value 'Debug' is 0
MSI (s) (30:4C) [16:12:54:163]: ******* RunEngine:
           ******* Product: C:\WINDOWS\system32\install_flash_player_16_active_x.msi
           ******* Action:
           ******* CommandLine: **********
MSI (s) (30:4C) [16:12:54:163]: Note: 1: 2203 2: C:\WINDOWS\system32\install_flash_player_16_active_x.msi 3: -2147287038
MSI (s) (30:4C) [16:12:54:164]: MainEngineThread is returning 2
MSI (s) (30:E4) [16:12:54:177]: User policy value 'DisableRollback' is 0
MSI (s) (30:E4) [16:12:54:178]: Machine policy value 'DisableRollback' is 0
MSI (s) (30:E4) [16:12:54:178]: Incrementing counter to disable shutdown. Counter after increment: 0
MSI (s) (30:E4) [16:12:54:178]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\Rollback\Scripts 3: 2
MSI (s) (30:E4) [16:12:54:178]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\Rollback\Scripts 3: 2
MSI (s) (30:E4) [16:12:54:178]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\InProgress 3: 2
MSI (s) (30:E4) [16:12:54:178]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\InProgress 3: 2
MSI (s) (30:E4) [16:12:54:178]: Decrementing counter to disable shutdown. If counter >= 0, shutdown will be denied. Counter after decrement: -1
MSI (s) (30:E4) [16:12:54:178]: Restoring environment variables
MSI (c) (E0:1C) [16:12:54:188]: Decrementing counter to disable shutdown. If counter >= 0, shutdown will be denied. Counter after decrement: -1
MSI (c) (E0:1C) [16:12:54:188]: MainEngineThread is returning 2
=== Verbose logging stopped: 18/12/2014 16:12:54 ===
PLUGIN
=== Verbose logging started: 18/12/2014 16:15:40 Build type: SHIP UNICODE 5.00.7601.00 Calling process: C:\WINDOWS\system32\msiexec.exe ===
MSI (c) (28:44) [16:15:40:364]: Resetting cached policy values
MSI (c) (28:44) [16:15:40:364]: Machine policy value 'Debug' is 0
MSI (c) (28:44) [16:15:40:364]: ******* RunEngine:
           ******* Product: install_flash_player_16_plugin.msi
           ******* Action:
           ******* CommandLine: **********
MSI (c) (28:44) [16:15:40:364]: Client-side and UI is none or basic: Running entire install on the server.
MSI (c) (28:44) [16:15:40:364]: Grabbed execution mutex.
MSI (c) (28:44) [16:15:40:384]: Cloaking enabled.
MSI (c) (28:44) [16:15:40:384]: Attempting to enable all disabled privileges before calling Install on Server
MSI (c) (28:44) [16:15:40:384]: Incrementing counter to disable shutdown. Counter after increment: 0
MSI (s) (30:2C) [16:15:40:384]: Running installation inside multi-package transaction C:\WINDOWS\system32\install_flash_player_16_plugin.msi
MSI (s) (30:2C) [16:15:40:384]: Grabbed execution mutex.
MSI (s) (30:3C) [16:15:40:384]: Resetting cached policy values
MSI (s) (30:3C) [16:15:40:384]: Machine policy value 'Debug' is 0
MSI (s) (30:3C) [16:15:40:384]: ******* RunEngine:
           ******* Product: C:\WINDOWS\system32\install_flash_player_16_plugin.msi
           ******* Action:
           ******* CommandLine: **********
MSI (s) (30:3C) [16:15:40:384]: Note: 1: 2203 2: C:\WINDOWS\system32\install_flash_player_16_plugin.msi 3: -2147287038
MSI (s) (30:3C) [16:15:40:384]: MainEngineThread is returning 2
MSI (s) (30:2C) [16:15:40:404]: User policy value 'DisableRollback' is 0
MSI (s) (30:2C) [16:15:40:404]: Machine policy value 'DisableRollback' is 0
MSI (s) (30:2C) [16:15:40:404]: Incrementing counter to disable shutdown. Counter after increment: 0
MSI (s) (30:2C) [16:15:40:404]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\Rollback\Scripts 3: 2
MSI (s) (30:2C) [16:15:40:404]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\Rollback\Scripts 3: 2
MSI (s) (30:2C) [16:15:40:404]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\InProgress 3: 2
MSI (s) (30:2C) [16:15:40:404]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\InProgress 3: 2
MSI (s) (30:2C) [16:15:40:404]: Decrementing counter to disable shutdown. If counter >= 0, shutdown will be denied. Counter after decrement: -1
MSI (s) (30:2C) [16:15:40:404]: Restoring environment variables
MSI (c) (28:44) [16:15:40:414]: Decrementing counter to disable shutdown. If counter >= 0, shutdown will be denied. Counter after decrement: -1
MSI (c) (28:44) [16:15:40:414]: MainEngineThread is returning 2
=== Verbose logging stopped: 18/12/2014 16:15:40 ===

Is a corrupted file the version or the master file?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for