ISE Authentication timers issues

Is there a way within ISE so that when a machine uses dot1x to authenticate that it will not occur for an extended period of time?

You can disable re-authentication or send the values from ISE.
It's actually best practice to disable reauthentication or if needed, keep it above 2 hours.

Similar Messages

Cisco ISE authentication failed because client reject certificate

Hi Experts,
I am a newbie in ISE and having problem in my first step in authentication. Please help.
I am trying to deploy a standalone Cisco ISE 1.1.2 with WLC using 802.1x authentication. The user authentication configured to be checked to ISE's internal user database for early deployment. But when the user try to authenticate, they failed with error message in ISE :
Authentication failed : 12321 PEAP failed SSL/TLS handshake because the client rejected the ISE local-certificate
I've generate a certificate for ISE using Windows Server CA and replace ISE's self-signed certificate with the new certificate but authentication still failed with the same error message. Must I generate a certificate for WLC also? Please help me in solving this problem.
Regards,
Ratna

Certificate-Based User Authentication via Supplicant Failing
Symptoms or
Issue
User authentication is failing on the client machine, and the user is receiving a
“RADIUS Access-Reject” form of message.
Conditions (This issue occurs with authentication protocols that require certificate validation.)
Possible Authentications report failure reasons:
• “Authentication failed: 11514 Unexpectedly received empty TLS message;
treating as a rejection by the client”
• “Authentication failed: 12153 EAP-FAST failed SSL/TLS handshake because
the client rejected the Cisco ISE local-certificate”
Click the magnifying glass icon from Authentications to display the following output
in the Authentication Report:
• 12305 Prepared EAP-Request with another PEAP challenge
• 11006 Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
• 11001 Received RADIUS Access-Request
• 11018 RADIUS is reusing an existing session
• 12304 Extracted EAP-Response containing PEAP challenge-response
• 11514 Unexpectedly received empty TLS message; treating as a rejection by the
client
• 12512 Treat the unexpected TLS acknowledge message as a rejection from the
client
• 11504 Prepared EAP-Failure
• 11003 Returned RADIUS Access-Reject
• 11006 Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
• 11001 Received RADIUS Access-Request
• 11018 RADIUS is re-using an existing session
• 12104 Extracted EAP-Response containing EAP-FAST challenge-response
• 12815 Extracted TLS Alert message
• 12153 EAP-FAST failed SSL/TLS handshake because the client rejected the
Cisco ISE local-certificate
• 11504 Prepared EAP-Failure
• 11003 Returned RADIUS Access-Reject
Note This is an indication that the client does not have or does not trust the Cisco
ISE certificates.
Possible Causes The supplicant or client machine is not accepting the certificate from Cisco ISE.
The client machine is configured to validate the server certificate, but is not
configured to trust the Cisco ISE certificate.
Resolution The client machine must accept the Cisco ISE certificate to enable authentication.

ISE WLC Integration issues

We are in the process of integrating ISE into our WLC and are planning on implementing HReap (Flexconnect) local switching. We have setup the ISE server as a Radius entry in the WLC and added WLC to ISE, same shared secret. We have a test SSID configured on the WLC and it is using the entry to ISE for AAA. We have used "none" for layer 2 security as well as WPA.......but we never see any activity on the ISE server. Also from the WLC if we do a show radius auth stat there doesn't appear to be any traffic sent from the WLC to ISE.
(Cisco Controller) >show radius auth sta
Authentication Servers:
<Output Ommited>
Server Index..................................... 4
Server Address................................... IP ADDRESS OF ISE
Msg Round Trip Time.............................. 0 (msec)
First Requests................................... 0
Retry Requests................................... 0
Accept Responses................................. 0
Reject Responses................................. 0
Challenge Responses.............................. 0
Malformed Msgs................................... 0
Bad Authenticator Msgs........................... 0
Pending Requests................................. 0
Timeout Requests................................. 0
Unknowntype Msgs................................. 0
Other Drops...................................... 0
We have integrated ISE with swtich and ASA and have always been able to get some activity on the ISE authentication monitor.
Thanks,
Joe

Wireless will not do dACLs with or without FlexConnect. In centrally switched networks you can use Named ACLs which are differnt than dACLs.
But you are correct with FlexConnect (pre-7.5*) you can use FlexConnect ACLs tied to the VLAN. Then you can use ISE to set the VLAN.
*As of 7.5 version of code you can now user named ACLs on Locally Switched users, but it is still a named ACL and not a dACL.
From the release notes
In the earlier releases, you could have a per client access control list (ACL) in a centrally switched traffic. In this release, this feature has been enhanced to support ACL for local switching traffic with both central and local authentication. Client ACL is returned from AAA on successful client Layer 2 authentication as part of Airespace RADIUS attributes. As the Airespace RADIUS attribute is an ACL name, the ACL must be already present on the FlexConnect AP.
In downstream traffic, VLAN ACL is applied first and then the client ACL is applied. In upstream traffic, the client ACL is applied first and then the VLAN ACL is applied.
There are some other limitations when using FlexConnect that you should be aware about.
This guide will show you how to use Centrally Authenticated with Locally Switched
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11640/products_configuration_example09186a0080c090eb.shtml
This document will show you the feature matrix for ISE and FlexConnect
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10315/products_tech_note09186a0080b3690b.shtml
If you are using Active Directory I would recommend against using LDAP because there are more features when using the native AD integration. If you not using AD then the issue with the Secure LDAP is probably related to the CA certificate not being installed correctly.

Cisco ISE: 802.1x Timers Best Practices / Re-authentication Timers [EAP-TLS]

Dear Folks,
Kindly, suggest the best recommended values for the timers in 802.1x (EAP-TLS)... Should i keep default all or change or some of them?
Also, what do we need reauthentication timers? Any benefit to use it? Does it prompt to users or became invisible? and What are the best values, in case if we need to use it?
Thanks,
Regards,
Mubasher
My Interface Configuration is as below;
interface GigabitEthernet1/34
switchport access vlan 131
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 195
ip access-group ACL-DEFAULT in
authentication event fail action authorize vlan 131
authentication event server dead action authorize vlan 131
authentication event server alive action reinitialize
authentication open
authentication order dot1x mab
authentication priority dot1x mab
authentication port-control auto
mab
snmp trap mac-notification change added
dot1x pae authenticator
dot1x timeout tx-period 5
storm-control broadcast level 30.00
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree bpduguard enable

Hello Mubashir,
Many timers can be modified as needed in a deployment. Unless you are experiencing a specific problem where adjusting the timer may correct unwanted behavior, it is recommended to leave all timers at their default values except for the 802.1X transmit timer (tx-period).
The tx-period timer defaults to a value of 30 seconds. Leaving this value at 30 seconds provides a default wait of 90 seconds (3 x tx-period) before a switchport will begin the next method of authentication, and begin the MAB process for non-authenticating devices.
Based on numerous deployments, the best-practice recommendation is to set the tx-period value to 10 seconds to provide the optimal time for MAB devices. Setting the value below 10 seconds may result in the port moving to MAC authentication bypass too quickly.
Configure the tx-period timer.
C3750X(config-if-range)#dot1x timeout tx-period 10

ISE 1.2 issue with CWA (Error : Your session has expired)

Hii
we have ISE deployment with two administration nodes and two service policy nodes running 1.2.1.198 , with CWA for wireless guest users (Cisco WLC) . Suddenly , many guest users faced an issue where login page is redirected but after inserting user/password it gave ""Your session has expired. Sign on again""
authentication logs on ISE shows:
Event 5418 Guest Authentication Failed
Failure Reason 86017 Session Missing
Resolution Please contact your Administrator
Root cause SessionID is missing. Please contact your System Administrator
we suspected the bug CSCul10677 , but it is fixed in 1.2.1.198 . We reloaded the two service policy nodes and that resolved the issue temporarily , but it showed back after couple of hours . The issue appeared with some users not all , and with no specific devies or operating systems.
Any idea ?
Regards,
Mohammad

Please refer the link : https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12131531/ise-12-guest-access-session-expired
Workaround:
Terminate session from admin UI and type in the original URL to redirect to guest portal with a new session-id.
Disconnect SSID, wait for a few minutes, reconnect and enter the original URL to redirect to guest portal with the new session-id.

ISE authentication fail during windows re-logon

Background:
Deployed a Cisco ISE 1.1.2. that is used to authenticate and posture validate for wired users, attached to Cisco IP Phones. Backend database is Microsoft AD.
Problem:
At the first time both, users and IP Phones, pass authentication and posture validation steps successfully. When the user logs off from windows, the log off is done whithout any problem, and I can see it switch.
The problem takes place when the user try to log on again. The ise does not match the configured authenticion rules as in the first time, and put the user directly to default "DenyAccess" policy (rule).
Anyone out there experienced something similar or have any ideas on why this is happening?
Thanks.

Hi
Possible Causes
• This could be either a MAB or 802.1X authentication issue.
• The authorization profile could be missing the Cisco av-pair=”device-traffic-class=voice” attribute. As a result, the switch does not recognize the traffic on the voice VLAN.
• The administrator did not add the endpoint as static identity, or did not allow an unregistered endpoint to pass. create a policy rule to (“Continue/Continue/Continue” upon failure).
Resolution
• Verify that the Authorization Policy is framed properly for groups and conditions, and check to see whether the IP phone is profiled as an “IP phone”or as a “Cisco-device.”
• Verify the switch port configuration for multidomain and voice VLAN configuration.
• Add the continue/continue/continue to allow the endpoint to pass:
Choose Policy > Policy Elements > Results > Authentication > Allowed
Protocols to create a Protocol Policy. MAC authentications use PAP/ASCII and EAP-MD5 protocols. Enable the following MAB Protocols settings:
– Process Host Lookup
– PAP/ASCII
– Detect PAP as Host Lookup
– EAP-MD5
– Detect EAP-MD5 as Host Lookup
• From the main menu, choose Policy > Authentication.
• Change the authentication method from Simple to Rule-Based
• Use the action icon to create new Authentication Method entries for MAB:
– Name: MAB
– Condition: IF MAB RADIUS:Service-Type == Call Check
– Protocols: allow protocols MAB_Protocols and use
– Identity Source: Internal
– Hosts: Continue/Continue/Continue

ISE / Active Directory: issue to get users group

Hello,
We have a strange issue:
- ISE 1.2 patch 8
- no WLC, autonomous AP
In authentication, we check Wireless IEEE 802.11 (radius) and cisco-av-pair (ssid), then we use AD.
We have 3 SSIDs, so 3 rules, one DATA, one GUEST, one for TOIP.
In one more rules to grant authentication from APs to register in WDS: user in local database.
In authorization, we check cisco-av-pair (ssid) and AD user group, then we permit access.
(so 3 rules), and one more to authorise the internal base for WDS.
We have something strange:
- sometimes users can connect but later they can't: in the logs, the authorization rejects the user because the AD Group is not seen.
Exemple:
1- OK:
Authentication Details
Source Timestamp
2014-05-15 11:43:19.064
Received Timestamp
2014-05-15 11:43:19.065
Policy Server
radius
Event
5200 Authentication succeeded
All the GROUPS of user are seen:
false
AD ExternalGroups
xx/users/admexch
AD ExternalGroups
xx/users/glkdp
AD ExternalGroups
x/users/gl revue écriture
AD ExternalGroups
xx/users/pcanywhere
AD ExternalGroups
xx/users/wifidata
AD ExternalGroups
xx/informatique/campus/destinataires/aa informatique
AD ExternalGroups
xx/informatique/campus/destinataires/aa entreprises et cités
AD ExternalGroups
xx/informatique/campus/destinataires/aa campus
AD ExternalGroups
xx/users/aiga_creches
AD ExternalGroups
xx/users/admins du domaine
AD ExternalGroups
xx/users/utilisa. du domaine
AD ExternalGroups
xx/users/groupe de réplication dont le mot de passe rodc est refusé
AD ExternalGroups
xx/microsoft exchange security groups/exchange view-only administrators
AD ExternalGroups
xx/microsoft exchange security groups/exchange public folder administrators
AD ExternalGroups
xx/users/certsvc_dcom_access
AD ExternalGroups
xx/builtin/administrateurs
AD ExternalGroups
xx/builtin/utilisateurs
AD ExternalGroups
xx/builtin/opérateurs de compte
AD ExternalGroups
xx/builtin/opérateurs de serveur
AD ExternalGroups
xx/builtin/utilisateurs du bureau à distance
AD ExternalGroups
xx/builtin/accès dcom service de certificats
RADIUS Username
xx\cennelin
Device IP Address
172.25.2.87
Called-Station-ID
00:3A:98:A5:3E:20
CiscoAVPair
ssid=CAMPUS
ssid
campus
2- NO OK later:
Authentication Details
Source Timestamp
2014-05-15 16:17:35.69
Received Timestamp
2014-05-15 16:17:35.69
Policy Server
radius
Event
5434 Endpoint conducted several failed authentications of the same scenario
Failure Reason
15039 Rejected per authorization profile
Resolution
Authorization Profile with ACCESS_REJECT attribute was selected as a result of the matching authorization rule. Check the appropriate Authorization policy rule-results.
Root cause
Selected Authorization Profile contains ACCESS_REJECT attribute
Only 3 Groups of the user are seen:
Other Attributes
ConfigVersionId
5
Device Port
1645
DestinationPort
1812
RadiusPacketType
AccessRequest
UserName
host/xxxxxxxxxxxx
Protocol
Radius
NAS-IP-Address
172.25.2.80
NAS-Port
51517
Framed-MTU
1400
State
37CPMSessionID=b0140a6f0000C2E15374CC7F;32SessionID=radius/189518899/49890;
cisco-nas-port
51517
IsEndpointInRejectMode
false
AcsSessionID
radius/189518899/49890
DetailedInfo
Authentication succeed
SelectedAuthenticationIdentityStores
AD1
ADDomain
xxxxxxxxxxx
AuthorizationPolicyMatchedRule
Default
CPMSessionID
b0140a6f0000C2E15374CC7F
EndPointMACAddress
00-xxxxxxxxxxxx
ISEPolicySetName
Default
AllowedProtocolMatchedRule
MDP-PC-PEAP
IdentitySelectionMatchedRule
Default
HostIdentityGroup
Endpoint Identity Groups:Profiled:Workstation
Model Name
Cisco
Location
Location#All Locations#Site-MDP
Device Type
Device Type#All Device Types#Cisco-Bornes
IdentityAccessRestricted
false
AD ExternalGroups
xx/users/ordinateurs du domaine
AD ExternalGroups
xx/users/certsvc_dcom_access
AD ExternalGroups
xx/builtin/accès dcom service de certificats
Called-Station-ID
54:75:D0:DC:5B:7C
CiscoAVPair
ssid=CAMPUS
If you have an idea, thanks so much,
Regards,

To configure debug logs via the Cisco ISE user interface, complete the following steps
:Step 1 Choose Administration > System > Logging > Debug Log Configuration. The Node List page appears, which contains a list of nodes and their personas.
You can use the Filter button to search for a specific node, particularly if the node list is large.
www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.0/user_guide/ise10_logging.html#wp1059750

Ise Authentication to two different forests second using External Radius, Not LDAP

Hi Guys,
I am hoping someone can help me. We currently have two AD forests one for staff and one for students. These forests do not have a two way trust between them nor do we want to. We currently have Ise 1.2 integration with our Student forest using AD working just fine. The ipads and other devices are playing nicely and cooperating well. We want to get our staff to be able to use ISE as well. Currently there is no way to use two AD forests so I was directed to use LDAP instead for the second domain. Unfortunatley after playing around with it LDAP doesn't support mschapv2 which our mobile devices like ipads do play nicely with. This causes an issue only because we would have to utilize certificates to get everything to work correctly. This is not the route we want to go. So i was speaking to Tac and they recommended using an External Radius server. Then modify my auth profiles to look for the domain name in the authentication string. If it starts for example student\ then i can have ise forward the auth request to the AD integrated PSNs for auth. If the auth string starts with staff\ for example i should be able to forward this request to my external radius server.
This sounds all good in theory but i have not found any documentation to support this to help me configure it. Has anyone tried this approach? Or have any leads on where i can find some good documentation as to what radius servers are supported. I am hoping Windows server 2008 R2 with a radius role installed, but i am just not sure.
If anyone can help i would greatly appreciate it.
Thank you
Joey

That is correct! Cisco ISE supports integration with a single Active Directory identity source. Cisco ISE uses this Active Directory identity source to join itself to an Active Directory domain. If this Active Directory source has a multidomain forest, trust relationships must exist between its domain and the other domains in order for Cisco ISE to retrieve information from all domains within the forest.
However, you may create multiple instances for LDAP. Cisco ISE can communicate via LDAP to Active Directory servers in an untrusted domain. The only limitation you would see with LDAP being a database that it doesn't support PEAP MSCHAPv2 ( native microsoft supplicant). However it does suppport EAP-TLS.
For more information you may go through the below listed link
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns414/ns742/ns744/docs/howto_45_multiple_active_directories.pdf

ISE Authentication Policy for RSA Securid and LDAP for VPN

We are working on replacing our existing ACS server with ISE. We have 2 groups of users, customers and employees. The employee's utilize RSA securid for authentication while the customers use Window authentication. We have integrated the AD into ISE using LDAP and this has been tested. We are now working on trying to get the rsa portion to work. We are wanting to utilize the authorization policy to assign the group-policy/IP for both clients via the LDAP user attributes.
Here is my question:
Under the authentication policy should we look @ an identity store that has RSA securid users, LDAP users and then internal users. I assume if the user isn't present in the RSA store it will then look @ the LDAP, will this present an issue with overhead in our RSA environment. With the legacy ACS the descsion on where to authenticate the user was done on the ACS, either Windows or RSA. The employee users will still also be present in the LDAP so we can utilize the attributes for IP address/group policy. The number of customer vpn's is several times larger than employees and I am afraid that if we have to query the securid servers for every authentication vpn authentication attempt this could cause issues. Our utilimate goal is to move to any connect and utilize a single url for all authentication but allow ise to instruct the asa what attributes to hand to the client such as dns/Dacl.
Thanks,
Joe

That is not what I want. I want user "test1" to be able to do this:
C
Username: test1
Enter PASSCODE:
C2960>en
Enter PASSCODE:
C2960#
In other words, test1 user has to type in his/her RSA token password to get
into exec mode. After that, he/she has to use the RSA token password to
get into enable mode. Each user can get into "enable" mode with his/her
RSA token mode.
The way you descripbed, it seemed like anyone in this group can go directly
into enable mode without password. This is not what I have in mind.
Any other ideas? Thanks.

ISE: Authentication vs Posturing - log coorelation?

Right from the start it is INCREDIBLY easy to see who is trying to login to the VPN using ISE...and then it is easy to get to the screen to tell you who passed/failed posturing.
What I am looking for is a way to tell if someone logged in but did not get postured at all. We have a handful of users that the NAC agent keeps disappearing, hanging, or just not responding. In these cases, I can see that they authenticate, but there is no entry I can find that says; hey this user logged in, but no posturing happened.
This would be extremely helpful in doing proactive support so we can contact these users and see what is going on.
Anyone know of a way to make this happen?
Thanks,
Dirk

I think I ran into this issue and the problem lies in the way the username is missing when coa is sent to the ipn when a client is "compliant" I dont have an instance in 1.2 yet to see if this has changed with the new live authentications dashboard but it might be worth opening a tac case to see if the ipn loggin has changed.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App

ISE authentication

HI All
I hope someone is able to help with the following:
We currently use ISE to authenticate domain users connecting to our corporate wifi. ISE checks Windows AD for the wireless policy. The issue is that once a machine connects to the wifi, it allows any user to connect regardless of whether that user is allowed access in a later policy.
We would like to configure authorization so that it uses Computer and User authorization, ie only if the computer and users are in AD, can the user successfully authenticate.
The problem with this config is that I can log onto a Corp laptop as a local user, and still get access to the Corporate Wifi.
The reason being that the connection hits the first rule which allows computer access, and doesn't check that the user authentication.
I'd therefore like to configure ISE so that it checks for computer and user authentication together, so that both parts need to be met before access is allowed.
Regards Craig

Hi Craig
Authentication policies define the protocols that Cisco ISE should use to communicate with the network
devices, and the identity sources that it should use for authentication. A policy is a set of conditions and
a result. A policy condition consists of an operand (attribute), an operator (equal to, not equal to, greater
than, and so on), and a value. Compound conditions are made up of one or more simple conditions that
are connected by the AND or OR operator. At runtime, Cisco ISE evaluates the policy condition and then
applies the result that you have defined based on whether the policy evaluation returns a true or a false
value.
Note: During policy condition evaluation, Cisco ISE compares an attribute with a value. It is possible to run
into a situation where the attribute specified in the policy condition may not have a value assigned in the
request. In such cases, if the operator that is used for comparison is “not equal to,” then the condition
will evaluate to true. In all other cases, the condition will evaluate to false.

ISE : Authentication for IKEv2

Just to check if anyone might be able to assist me regarind an issue that I am trying to work out a solution for.
My Requirements are: Multitenant deployment using ASR1K with IKEv2 vpn authenticated with ISE or ACS and user databases in most cases will be in Active Directory. And authentication has to be with User and Password.
EAP-MD5: does not work with LDAP integration with Active directory, it does however work in Radius proxy mode but security level of password storage in AD has to be degrated alot by allowing AD to store reversible passwords.
EAP-GTC: As far as I understand from everything I read, this might be the holy grail for U/P authentication for IKEv2. But in ISE and ACS EAP-GTC is only supported as an inner method in PEAP and EAP-FAST will this change in the near future ?
And is there possibly something else that I am missing which might be a solution to this design criteria ?

The first method is local web authentication. In this case, the WLC redirects the HTTP traffic to an internal or external server where the user is prompted to authenticate. The WLC then fetches the credentials (sent back via an HTTP GET request in the case of external server) and makes a RADIUS authentication. In the case of a guest user, an external server (such as Identity Services Engine (ISE) or NAC Guest Server (NGS)) is required as the portal provides features such as device registering and self-provisioning. The flow includes these steps:
Please follow below guide for step by step configuration:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11640/products_configuration_example09186a0080bead09.shtml

Cisco ISE authentication failed for Win XP SP3

Hello,
I have some trouble this Win XP wired Client authentication. With Win7 everything works well.
ISE 1.2 (patch 4)
Switch: 2960 / 2960S (15.0.(2)SE2)
Authentication details:
Event:
5400 Authentication failed:
Failure Reason
11514 Unexpectedly received empty TLS message; treating as a rejection by the client
Resolution
Ensure that the client's supplicant does not have any known compatibility issues and that it is properly configured. Also ensure that the ISE server certificate is trusted by the client, by configuring the supplicant with the CA certificate that signed the ISE server certificate. It is strongly recommended to not disable the server certificate validation on the client!
Root cause While trying to negotiate a TLS handshake with the client, ISE expected to receive a non-empty TLS message or TLS alert message, but instead received an empty TLS message. This could be due to an inconformity in the implementation of the protocol between ISE and the supplicant. For example, it is a known issue that the XP supplicant sends an empty TLS message instead of a non-empty TLS alert message. It might also involve the supplicant not trusting the ISE server certificate for some reason. ISE treated the unexpected message as a sign that the client rejected the tunnel establishment.
I try to disable validate server certificates on Win XP Clients, but it won´t work for me.
Add ISE self-sign certificate to clients trusted root certification authorities and enable validate server certificates also won´t work.
Any idea?
thanks

The ISE use a self-signed certificate. I add this self-signed certificate to the clients "trusted root certification authorities", enable validate server certificates at the eap properties and select the added certificate from the trust list. But if I uncheck validate server certificates, I see the same error message as well.
Are there any differences between xp client config and win7 client config?
thanks,

Claims Based Authentication SPSecurityTokenService.Issue() failed: The security token username and password could not be validated.

Please excuse the lousy table...Its late :-)
I have a multi-server SP2010 farm. Patched up to
Configuration database version: 14.0.6106.5002
My goal is to have a claims based web application that authenticated to ADAM for Extranet. I have configured the servers exactly to MSDN and technet specs (following this spec to the
letter (
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee806882.aspx) to allow the forms side of the web app to authenticate to ADAM.
IT WORKS IN DEV!!! , which is a single server farm. However, it does not work in production. I get the following:
Claims Auth log entries:
1:06:25 AM
w3wp.exe (0x0EDC)
0x1790
SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication
f2ut
Verbose
Authenticated with login provider. Validating request security token.
1:06:25 AM
w3wp.exe (0x0EDC)
0x1790
SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication
0
Verbose
Using membership provider 'ADAMProvider'.
1:06:25 AM
w3wp.exe (0x0EDC)
0x1790
SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication
0
Verbose
Doing password check on '[email protected]'.
1:06:46 AM
w3wp.exe (0x0EDC)
0x1790
SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication
0
Verbose
Failed password check on '[email protected]'.
1:06:46 AM
w3wp.exe (0x0EDC)
0x1790
SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication
0
Unexpected
Password check on '[email protected]' generated exception: 'System.ServiceModel.FaultException`1[Microsoft.IdentityModel.Tokens.FailedAuthenticationException]: The security
token username and password could not be validated. (Fault Detail is equal to Microsoft.IdentityModel.Tokens.FailedAuthenticationException: The security token username and password could not be validated.).'.
1:06:46 AM
w3wp.exe (0x0EDC)
0x1790
SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication
fo1t
Monitorable
SPSecurityTokenService.Issue() failed: System.ServiceModel.FaultException`1[Microsoft.IdentityModel.Tokens.FailedAuthenticationException]: The security token username and password
could not be validated. (Fault Detail is equal to Microsoft.IdentityModel.Tokens.FailedAuthenticationException: The security token username and password could not be validated.).
1:06:46 AM
w3wp.exe (0x1B34)
0x08A0
SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication
fsq7
High
Request for security token failed with exception: System.ServiceModel.FaultException: The security token username and password could not be validated.
at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.ReadResponse(Message response)
at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.Issue(RequestSecurityToken rst, RequestSecurityTokenResponse& rstr)
  at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.Issue(RequestSecurityToken rst)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurityContext.SecurityTokenForContext(Uri context, Boolean bearerToken, SecurityToken onBehalfOf, SecurityToken actAs, SecurityToken delegateTo)
1:06:46 AM
w3wp.exe (0x1B34)
0x08A0
SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication
8306
Critical
An exception occurred when trying to issue security token: The security token username and password could not be validated..
1:06:46 AM
w3wp.exe (0x1B34)
0x08A0
SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication
f2un
Verbose
Form authentication failed.
I have tried EVERYTHING (well, nt everything, I don’t have the fix I suppose).
I found plenty out there and nothing directly correlates with this issue.
I searched on all parts of the errors I got.
This contains an interesting blurb about setting up access for the apppool id correctly.
That’s not the case for me. It works in dev and the same id are used there.
http://sharepoint-2010-world.blogspot.com/2011/03/adam-forms-based-authentication-in.html
This was good but it doesn’t give specs on what the environment looks like:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/sharepoint2010general/thread/557143a6-4b36-4939-bb7f-d62a9335fd18
The was interesting…but I am patched up beyond the June 2011 CU so it’s a moot point:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepoint2010setup/thread/9b8368ef-c5e5-4ead-b348-7b2b5587cfc8
Any and all help would be greatly appreciated!

Hi.
You say its a multiserver farm, do you have more than one web server then?
If thats the case, have you tried accessing the site on each server directly?
Found this for you, maybe that can help?
Troubleshooting Exceptions: System.ServiceModel.FaultException`1
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb907220.aspx
and this:
SharePoint 2010 Claims Authentication - The security token username and password could not be validated reoccurring every morning
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/pl-PL/sharepoint2010setup/thread/383f1f9b-5c4a-4e19-b770-2a54b7ab1ca1
and
This seems to be a good guide:
http://donalconlon.wordpress.com/2010/02/23/configuring-forms-base-authentication-for-sharepoint-2010-using-iis7/
Good luck
Thomas Balkeståhl - Technical Specialist - SharePoint - http://blksthl.wordpress.com

WLC to ISE authentication for Guest

Hi Experts,
Hope if you could guide me with our setup for Guest users. Below is what we are doing
a)     Guest connects to SSID
b)     WLC is being used to redirect Guest HTTP to WLC internal Portal
c)     WLC forwards guest authentication details to cisco ISE [ISE and WLC radius]
The guest connects to SSID and does get WLC portal for authentication, when the username and password entered on Cisco ISE i see error message as
'User Identity not found in any of Identity Store' though it is going through correct Store and the Guest name is certainly configured on Cisco ISE. ISE version is 1.2 and WLC is 7.4, please let me know if i am missing anything here.
Appreciate your help

The first method is local web authentication. In this case, the WLC redirects the HTTP traffic to an internal or external server where the user is prompted to authenticate. The WLC then fetches the credentials (sent back via an HTTP GET request in the case of external server) and makes a RADIUS authentication. In the case of a guest user, an external server (such as Identity Services Engine (ISE) or NAC Guest Server (NGS)) is required as the portal provides features such as device registering and self-provisioning. The flow includes these steps:
Please follow below guide for step by step configuration:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11640/products_configuration_example09186a0080bead09.shtml

ISE Authentication timers issues

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for