Isolation level when using UserTransaction

          What isolation level does WLS assign to JDBC connection objects when used within
          a user-controlled JTA transaction?
          e.g. when using the following code within a servlet:
          UserTransaction ut = (UserTransaction) ictx.lookup("java:comp/Usertransaction");
          ut.begin();
          DataSource ds = ictx.lookup("java:comp/env/jdbc/datasource");
          Connection conn = ds.getConnection();
          ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery("....");
          conn.commit();
          Does weblogic force a specific isolation level, or will it fall back to the default
          of the database?
          We are using WLS 8.1 SP1 and Oracle 9.
          /Johan
          

          johan Eltes wrote:
          > What isolation level does WLS assign to JDBC connection objects when used within
          > a user-controlled JTA transaction?
          > e.g. when using the following code within a servlet:
          >
          > UserTransaction ut = (UserTransaction) ictx.lookup("java:comp/Usertransaction");
          > ut.begin();
          > DataSource ds = ictx.lookup("java:comp/env/jdbc/datasource");
          > Connection conn = ds.getConnection();
          > ...
          > ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery("....");
          > ...
          > conn.commit();
          >
          > Does weblogic force a specific isolation level, or will it fall back to the default
          > of the database?
          > We are using WLS 8.1 SP1 and Oracle 9.
          The Spec says that the connection should be in the DBMS's default isolation level
          until set differently. For Oracle you will be in READ-COMMITTED. That's what you want
          because Oracle's SERIALIZABLE isolation level is problematic, not doing what most
          folks assume...
          Joe
          > /Johan
          

Similar Messages

  • Setting Transaction isolation level when I'm not in an EJB

              I have a Message Driven Bean (MDB) that is container managed, and its transaction
              isolation is set to TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED in weblogic-ejb-jar.xml and that
              seems to work fine. If I look at an entity bean in onMessage which is updated/commited
              outside the transaction I can see the updates no problem.
              Now the problem is this.. inside the onMessage method, the MDB creates a new
              instance of a class. This class starts up its own UserTransaction (using (UserTransaction)new
              InitialContext().lookup("javax.transaction.UserTransaction")) and goes into a
              loop working away. Inside the loop it is inspecting a value on an entity bean.
              The classs never sees any updates to this bean which are made outside this new
              UserTransaction.
              It looks to me that the UserTransaction that the class is getting has a different
              isolation level (serialized?). Is there a way to set the isolation level for
              a UserTransaction?
              Any help would be great!
              lance
              

              Just a follow up, I think the isolation level is perhaps being set to REPEATABLE_READ,
              since that is what seems to be happening. The value from the first read is maintained
              through subsequent reads in the same transaction.
              lance
              "Lance" <[email protected]> wrote:
              >
              >I have a Message Driven Bean (MDB) that is container managed, and its
              >transaction
              >isolation is set to TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED in weblogic-ejb-jar.xml
              >and that
              >seems to work fine. If I look at an entity bean in onMessage which is
              >updated/commited
              >outside the transaction I can see the updates no problem.
              >
              >Now the problem is this.. inside the onMessage method, the MDB creates
              >a new
              >instance of a class. This class starts up its own UserTransaction (using
              >(UserTransaction)new
              >InitialContext().lookup("javax.transaction.UserTransaction")) and goes
              >into a
              >loop working away. Inside the loop it is inspecting a value on an entity
              >bean.
              > The classs never sees any updates to this bean which are made outside
              >this new
              >UserTransaction.
              >
              >It looks to me that the UserTransaction that the class is getting has
              >a different
              >isolation level (serialized?). Is there a way to set the isolation level
              >for
              >a UserTransaction?
              >
              >Any help would be great!
              >
              >lance
              

  • Setting Isolation Level In A UserTransaction

    We are having a problem where a class creates a UserTransaction from the InitialContext,
    but does not see any database changes made by other EJBs even though they have
    been committed. This "seems" like an isolation issue.
    What is the default isolation level for UserTransaction? And since it appears
    that it is not seeing committed data, what level should it be set to? (i.e. TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED
    would be nice...)

    this is mirrored from the transaction newsgroup:
    Joseph Weinstein <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >
    Interesting, but it's not an isolation level issue. There is no DBMS
    isolation level
    that could cause a user not to see already-committed data.Well, we are using Oracle as our backend and it supports Read Uncommitted, Read
    Committed and Serializable. The Serializable option would prevent a transaction
    from seeing any committed data to a table (i.e. prevents unrepeatable reads).
    The default isolation level of most DBMSes is READ_COMMITTED, and you
    should
    never have to change it, and you should be able to see already-committed
    data.I agree, but that is not happening for us (and this gets somewhat complicated
    with JMS). What is Weblogic 8.1's default isolation level for any transaction.
    From the link below, I get the impression it is SERIALIZABLE which would explain
    the behaviour I'm seeing. Athough the article seems to be talking about CMT (container
    transation), I would suspect a BMT (bean managed transaction) be similar (just
    manual).
    If this only confuses things, please let me know the easiest way to communicate
    this issue (code, etc..)
    http://newsgroups.bea.com/cgi-bin/dnewsweb?cmd=article&group=weblogic.developer.interest.transaction&item=227&utag
    (from the article)
    Subject: Re: What is ths default transaction isolation level
    Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:27:24 -0500
    From: "Cameron Purdy" <[email protected]>
    Organization: BEA SYSTEMS Inc
    Newsgroup: weblogic.developer.interest.transaction
    serializable
    -- Cameron Purdy Tangosol, Inc. http://www.tangosol.com +1.617.623.5782 WebLogic
    Consulting Available
    "mrityunjay" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:3a86c781$[email protected]..
    Hi , > If transaction isolation , for a EJB is not specified what is the > defaulttransaction isolation level > Thanks > Jay > >

  • Isolation level when set EJBC giving error

              We are trying to set the isolation level in weblogic-ejb-jar.xml
              we gave transaction-isolation tag after jndi-name tag. But EJBC is throwing SAXException
              saying that weblogic-enterprise-bean doesnot allow this tag. But its what doc says.
              We followed.
              What is the problem?
              I have attached the xml file with this.
              Thanks for ur help
              Srinath
              [weblogic-ejb-jar.xml]
              

    Srinath,
              there is one error in the atatched xml. Use TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED instead of
              READ_COMMITTED. The translation isolation tags were not added to the product until sp1. Do
              you have the service pack in the classpath when invoking ejbc?
              Steve
              Stephen Davies
              Davies Consulting Pty. Ltd.
              Sydney, Australia
              Ph. +61 2 9527 4274
              

  • Exception in createStatement when using UserTransactions

    I am trying to use UserTransactions in Weblogic. After obtaining and starting a transaction, I get the connection object. I am getting an error when I try to use connection.createStatement. The code and exception are below:
    The database is Oracle 9i.
    Code:
    Hashtable env = new Hashtable();
    env.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,
    "weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory");
    env.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, getWebLogicProviderUrl());
    initialContext = new InitialContext(env);
    UserTransaction tx=(UserTransaction)initialContext.lookup("javax.transaction.UserTrasanction);
    tx.begin();
    DataSource ds = (DataSource)getInitialContext().lookup(dataSource);
    Connection connection=ds.getConnection();
    Statement stmt=connection.createStatement();
    At the above line I get the following exception:
    java.sql.SQLException: weblogic.rmi.extensions.RemoteRuntimeException: Unexpected Exception - with nested exception:
    [java.rmi.MarshalException: error marshalling return; nested exception is:
         java.io.NotSerializableException: oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CConnection]
         at weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialConnection.createStatement(SerialConnection.java:168)
         at com.fedex.edm.updateapi.server.EdmUpdateSBO.deleteShipmentDoc(EdmUpdateSBO.java:962)
    If there is another way to implement to transaction mechanism please provide sample code.
    Thanks.
    Edited by nganesh21 at 04/01/2007 9:01 AM
    Edited by nganesh21 at 04/01/2007 9:04 AM

    Seems like a problem with the library.
    How about getting the source code for it and checking out that line 559 to see what causes the null and whether you can do anything about it. If not, then file a bug report about the lib.

  • Managed custom properties at site collection level when used as refiner returns no value in search result web part

    I have created certain crawled properties and mapped them to the OOB managed properties( refineable active )  in search schema at site collection level and tried to use them as refiner in the search
    site at farm level but it returns no value.
    But when i use the same crawled property and map it to a service level OOB metadata property ( refineable active ) and use it in search as refiner it returns result , Can you help as to why this difference is there.
    What steps should i do so that site level refiners also work in the enterprise search 
    Thanks in advance

    Hi  Dextar,
    According to your description, my understanding is that you want to create a site level refiner in SharePoint 2013.
    Here is a detailed blog you can refer to:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/tothesharepoint/archive/2013/11/11/how-to-add-refiners-to-your-search-results-page-for-sharepoint-2013.aspx
    Be aware that any changes in the manage property required full crawl.
    Best Regards,
    Eric
    Eric Tao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Can't adjust input level when using usb microphone

    Hey guys,
    I'm very familiar with this version of Garageband, and just started using a Blue Snowball USB mic. When I plug it in and set the drivers accordingly, the input volume slider is greyed out, making it inaccessible. Is there a trick to being able to adjust input volume?

    Option Click on the Volume slider icon in the menu bar and choose Sound Preferences. Choose the interface and you should be able to see the input level.

  • Is any extra isolation required when using Analog output to dirve higer power circuitry?

    I want to connect the analog output of a DAQcard-1200 to a current amplifier to give 5A and a tranformer to give approx 200V, is any extra isolation required to protect the card?

    Hello;
    As long as the maximum current that the board can source is taken in consideration and the input impedance of the external circuitry is high enough to prevent signal reflections back to the DAQ board, you should be good to go.
    However, since the protection circuitry can be built with such little budget, I wouldn't take my chances. I would go ahead and include the protection circuitry anyway.
    Regards
    Filipe A.
    Applications Engineer
    National Instruments

  • Setting Isolation level of UserTransaction Object

    can we set the Isolation level of the UserTransaction in case of bean managed transaction or in case where we are handeling transaction in servlets (I am trying to do it in servlets by geting Javax.Transaction.UserTransaction through JNDI in weblogic). UserTransaction only have few methods and none of them is to set the Isolation level. so where would be the seting or its not possible which I think should not be the case
    Thanks

    Hi,
    The UserTransaction is not the right place to set the isolation level, because then it would be the same setting
    for all data sources you access in that transaction.
    Rather, you can set the isolation level in each connection you make. That way, you can choose a different setting for each one.
    Best,
    Guy
    Guy Pardon ( [email protected] )
    Atomikos Software Technology: Transactioning the Net
    http://www.atomikos.com/

  • Transaction Isolation Level for EJB methods

    L.S.
    I just found out the in OC4J one can not set the transaction isolation level on ejb methods. Moreover one needs to revert to bean managed transaction (manual coding of the ALL transaction logic) to set the isolation level.
    On entity beans one can only set the isolation level for the whole bean (not on individual methods), and in session beans there is no way at all to set the isolation level.
    This is on shear contract to all other application servers I used before (there one can declaratively set the isolation level for a ejb method, both in session and in entitybean deployment descriptors)
    Is it foreseen in a future release to include such a valuable feature will be provided by oc4j?
    Note that I was VERY surprised that OC4J could not handle this (I checked the j2ee spec, but admittedly the spec is a little vague about this support and makes it vendor dependent. the j2ee spec does not mandate this, except for CMP entity beans, but includes some suggestions on this ability. But most other application servers implemented the ability)
    Regadrs,
    Erik

    Hello Erik --
    I think we met in Perth recently?
    Anyway, your information is correct.
    We can set the transaction isolation level for each entity bean, at the bean level. We don't have for the specification of method level isolation settings -- I'd be interested to hear how you would like/do use this. What behaviour do you expect to see when a transaction is started that spans multiple methods on a bean with different declared isolation levels.
    For session beans, we do not currently have the ability to declaratively specify the isolation level to use for the bean. I know this is not in the forthcoming 904 release, and will to check what is beyond that.
    As you point out, this can be done programatically using the Connection.setIsolationLevel() method on any connections you are using from within the session bean.
    I'd would like to log an enhancement request for you for this functionality. Can you send me an email at [email protected] and we'll take it offline.
    -steve-

  • Is isolation level setting(Dirtry Read Options) working fine for DB2?

    Hello Gurus,
    We are building obiee reports on DB2 OLTP database. As per my understanding if we select the Isolation level as "Dirty Read" it should not lock the tables but. In our case it is locking the tables and causing others(application Users) not to update the data. Please let us know if you have faced the same issue or any solution. Our production migration is stopped because of this issue.
    Thanks,
    Anil

              Just a follow up, I think the isolation level is perhaps being set to REPEATABLE_READ,
              since that is what seems to be happening. The value from the first read is maintained
              through subsequent reads in the same transaction.
              lance
              "Lance" <[email protected]> wrote:
              >
              >I have a Message Driven Bean (MDB) that is container managed, and its
              >transaction
              >isolation is set to TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED in weblogic-ejb-jar.xml
              >and that
              >seems to work fine. If I look at an entity bean in onMessage which is
              >updated/commited
              >outside the transaction I can see the updates no problem.
              >
              >Now the problem is this.. inside the onMessage method, the MDB creates
              >a new
              >instance of a class. This class starts up its own UserTransaction (using
              >(UserTransaction)new
              >InitialContext().lookup("javax.transaction.UserTransaction")) and goes
              >into a
              >loop working away. Inside the loop it is inspecting a value on an entity
              >bean.
              > The classs never sees any updates to this bean which are made outside
              >this new
              >UserTransaction.
              >
              >It looks to me that the UserTransaction that the class is getting has
              >a different
              >isolation level (serialized?). Is there a way to set the isolation level
              >for
              >a UserTransaction?
              >
              >Any help would be great!
              >
              >lance
              

  • Locks and Isolation Levels

    Hello,
    I'm new to the Oracle environment and have just started using PL/SQL on Oracle 8i. Where can I find info on how Oracle locks data and how transaction isolation levels are used? We've still not recvd our manuals so please any replies referring to manuals are not welcome!

    You could move forward balance into its own table. That was, the SELECT will not lock on the original table. Most of the running balance schemes that I have seen take a snapshot as of a given date (say, statement printing date) and record both the timestamp and the amount. Next month, you simply get last month's vaule and timestamp and query on transactions after that timestamp.
    - Saish

  • How do you determine a process or sessions isolation level.

    We are using COM+ components to issue database statements against an Oracle 8i database. COM+ has a property that allows you to set the isolation level. Is there any tool or query that would allow me to verify the isolation level in use by a session or process? I want to verify this property is actually affecting the connection to the DB.
    Thanks,
    Sam

    FLAG is just one of those columns that Oracle uses. It isn't documented but, as far as I know (which isn't very far), the only use for it is to record the isolation level for the transaction.
    I didn't mention it because I didn't think it helped you, for this reason: we don't get a record in the v$transaction view until the transaction has already started. At which point it is too late to change the ISOLATION_LEVEL for the transaction.
    Although I suppose you could do this:
    BEGIN
       UPDATE dummy_table set col1 = col1;
       -- remember V$TRANSACTION shows all txns
       SELECT count(1) INTO ln
       FROM   v$transaction t, v$session s
       WHERE  bitand(t.flag,268435456) <> 0
       AND    s.taddr = t.addr
       AND    s.audsid = sys_context('userenv', 'sessionid');
       IF ln = 0
       THEN
          ROLLBACK;
          SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE;
       END IF;
       --  do_whatever
       COMMIT;
    END ;.
    Cheers, APC

  • Using Isolation Level Serialazable

    I use Visual Basic/Windows Forms to create my project
    I have my form for amending orders ready.
    The flow is:
    Get order number
    Open connection
    sqlcommand to check if order number exists
    if not, return
    Set isolation level serialazable
    Get response to "Delete full order"
    If response is "Yes":
    trans = connlock.BeginTransaction("Delete_OA")
    qry = "delete from ilprod where iorno1 = " & miorno1.Text
    cmd = New SqlCommand(qry, connlock, trans)
    cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
    trans.Commit()
    MessageBox.Show("OA " & miorno1.Text & "Deleted")
    if response is no:
    I display the order details and items.
    if an item is selected, get response to "Delete item?"
    if response is yes,
    trans = connlock.BeginTransaction("Delete_Item")
    qry = "delete from ilprod where csno = " & mcsno.Text & " and itno = " & mitno.Text
    Dim cmd As SqlCommand
    cmd = New SqlCommand(qry, connlock, trans)
    cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
    miorno1.Text = 0
    MessageBox.Show("Item " & miorno1.Text & "/" & mnitno.Text & "Deleted")
    trans.Commit()
    and continue amendment.
    if response is no: proceed to amend item details etc.
    Finally, save amendments:
    qry = "select opamno from opcsno"
    Dim cmd = New SqlCommand(qry, connlock, trans)
    new_amno.Text = cmd.ExecuteScalar() + 1
    qry = "update opcsno set opamno = opamno + 1"
    cmd = New SqlCommand(qry, connlock, trans)
    cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
    qry = "update opmain set "
    qry = qry & "DORNO= " & "'" & DORNOTextBox.Text & "'"
    qry = qry & ",DORDT = " & "'" & CDate(DORDTDateTimePicker.Value) & "'"
    qry = qry & ",SIP1FL = " & SIP1FLTextBox.Text
    qry = qry & ",SIP2FL = " & SIP2FLTextBox.Text
    qry = qry & ",SIP3FL = " & SIP3FLTextBox.Text
    qry = qry & ",STAXFL = " & STAXFLCOMBO.SelectedValue
    qry = qry & ",DESTFL = " & DESTFLCOMBO.Text
    qry = qry & ",MODEFL = " & MODEFLCOMBO.SelectedValue
    qry = qry & ",CARRFL = " & CARRFLCOMBO.SelectedValue
    qry = qry & ",PACKFL = " & PACKFL.SelectedValue
    qry = qry & ",PAYTFL = " & PAYTFLCOMBO.SelectedValue
    qry = qry & ",SCDLFL = 4"
    qry = qry & ",AMNO = " & new_amno.Text
    qry = qry & ",IRDT = " & "'" & CDate(IRDTDateTimePicker.Value) & "'"
    qry = qry & " WHERE csno = " & mcsno.Text & ""
    cmd = New SqlCommand(qry, connlock, trans)
    cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
    qry = " delete from opnarr where csno = " & mcsno.Text
    cmd = New SqlCommand(qry, connlock, trans)
    cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
    If vbTrue Then
    qry = "insert into opnarr (csno,narfl,narr,amno) values ("
    qry = qry & mcsno.Text & ","
    qry = qry & "'A',"
    qry = qry & "'" & PAYTFLCOMBO.Text & "'" & ","
    qry = qry & new_amno.Text & ")"
    cmd = New SqlCommand(qry, connlock, trans)
    cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
    End If
    If vbTrue Then
    qry = "insert into opnarr (csno,narfl,narr,amno) values ("
    qry = qry & mcsno.Text & ","
    qry = qry & "'D'" & ","
    qry = qry & "'" & STAXFLCOMBO.Text & "'" & ","
    qry = qry & new_amno.Text & ")"
    cmd = New SqlCommand(qry, connlock, trans)
    cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
    End If
    If mmcd = "Z998" Or mmcd = "Z999" Then
    qry = "insert into opnarr (csno,narfl,narr,amno) values ("
    qry = qry & mcsno.Text & ","
    qry = qry & "'X'" & ","
    qry = qry & "'" & mname.Text & "'" & ","
    qry = qry & new_amno.Text & ")"
    cmd = New SqlCommand(qry, connlock, trans)
    cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
    End If
    For Each row In DataGridView1.Rows
    If row.selected Then
    qry = "update ilprod set qlty = " & row.cells("qlty").value
    qry = qry & ",siz1 = " & row.cells("siz1").value & ",siz2 = " & row.cells("siz2").value & ",siz3 = " & row.cells("siz3").value & ",sppr = " & "'" & row.cells("sppr").value & "'"
    cmd = New SqlCommand(qry, connlock, trans)
    cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
    qry = "update ilprod set pqty = 0, pmtr = 0 where csno = " & mcsno.Text & " and itno = " & mitno.Text & " and pqty < 0"
    ' This means that qnty will not be equal to inqty+pqty in such records
    cmd = New SqlCommand(qry, connlock, trans)
    cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
    qry = "delete from opscdl " & "where csno = " & mcsno.Text & " and itno = " & mitno.Text
    cmd = New SqlCommand(qry, connlock, trans)
    cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
    For Each scdlrow In DataGridView2.Rows
    If scdlrow.cells("csno").value = mcsno.Text And scdlrow.cells("itno").value = mitno.Text And scdlrow.cells("sqnty").value <> 0 Then
    qry = "insert into opscdl (csno,itno,sqnty,srmtr,sdate,stype,amno) values (" & scdlrow.cells("csno").value & "," & scdlrow.cells("itno").value & "," & scdlrow.cells("sqnty").value & "," & scdlrow.cells("srmtr").value & "," & "Convert(date,'" & scdlrow.cells("sdate").value & "')" & "," & "'" & scdlrow.cells("stype").value & "'" & "," & new_amno.Text & ")"
    cmd = New SqlCommand(qry, connlock, trans)
    cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
    End If
    Next
    End If
    Next
    trans.Commit()
    When I run the form, the Order is amended successfully: but I do not think the isolation level is set correctly: as I can access the order from another (new query) connection when the amendment is going on and not yet saved
    There are a large number of commands between accesing the records from SQL and the above Save Commands.
    Can Can someone guide me?
    To repeat: the flow is
    SET ISOLATION LEVEL
    GET ORDER NUMBER FROM SCREEN
    DELETE ORDER?
    DELETE ITEM?
    AMEND OA AND SAVE AMENDMENTS
    I apologise if the above has been unclear.
    Mohan
    MohanSQL

    Hi Mohan,
    As the issue is more related to Visual Basic/Windows Forms programming, I would like to recommend you post the question in the
    Visual Basic forum or
    Windows Forms forum. It is appropriate and more experts will assist you.
    Also, you can check the following articles about starting database transactions with the specified isolation level in Visual Basic or other projects.
    SqlConnection.BeginTransaction Method (IsolationLevel)
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/5ha4240h(v=vs.110).aspx
    ADO.NET Transactions and Concurrency in VB.NET
    http://www.dotnetheaven.com/article/ado.net-transactions-and-concurrency-in-vb.net
    Thanks,
    Lydia Zhang

  • When using the camera downloader in Adobe Bridge CS6 with Nikon D5200 we are unable to see previews of the photos and it is very slow to download. The issue occurs under a the users rights, but not under admin level. This is a new issue

    When using the camera downloader in Adobe Bridge CS6 with Nikon D5200 we are unable to see previews of the photos and it is very slow to download. The issue occurs under a the users rights, but not under admin level. This is a new issue.

    Hi Jdentremont,
    Lync client gets user photos by first querying the Address Book Web Query (ABWQ) service on the server, which is exposed through the Distribution List Expansion web service. The client receives
    the image file and then copies it to the user's cache to avoid downloading the image each time it needs to be displayed. The attribute values returned from the query are also stored in the cached Address Book Service entry for the user. The Address Book Service
    deletes all cached images every 24 hours, which means that it can take up to 24 hours for new user images to be updated in the cache on the server.
    To troubleshoot your problem, please follow the steps below:
    1.  Navigate to
     “X:\share\1-WebServices-1\ABfiles\000000000\000000000” folder. (ABS file share)
    You should see some photo files in this folder as the following screenshot.
    2. Delete all the files in this folder.
    3. On test PC, delete local cache files.
    %userprofile%\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Office\15.0\Lync\[email protected]
    4. Sign-in Lync with the test account.
    5. Go back to the ABS file share, check if there is any Photo file in the folder.
    Best regards,
    Eric
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I set up mhy Airport Express to extend my Time Capsule wifi wirelessly

    I want to extend my wifi off my Time Capsule with an Airport Experess in a part of my house that has no data cable ran to it. How do I do this? Thanks

  • Iphone 4 Can't "find" Wifi

    Hey all. I had an iPhone 3gs with iOS 4 installed, and it was able to connect to my wifi network. When I bought the iPhone 4, it can no longer connect to my wifi. For reference, MAC filtering is NOT on. Also, I am NOT broadcasting the SSID of my wifi

  • Soap adapter performance and timeout

    Hi I have two questions considering SOAP adapter. I have created a SOAP service in XI and it works. Now the non-functional requirements for this service are very high. Specially I am in trouble with two things. The service must give up real quick. If

  • Collect message into internal table

    Hi, does any one knows how BAPIs or CALL TRANSACTIONs collect messages into internal table. My problem is that some BI with CALL TRANSACTION doesn't collect right message into return table and I would like to collect this last message after CALL TRAN

  • TS1424 Issue with purchasing song on itunes after upgrade!!!

    I recently purchased Dark Horse by Katy Perry AFTER i upgraded my phone to the new iso7. During the purchase i agreed to the updated T & C's and confirmed to buy, but then it frose and it woudlnt let me do anything. The song has not downloaded to my