Issue in creation of level 2 WBS for level 1 WBS which is released

Hello All,
I am trying to create a level 2 WBS for a alrealy created level 1 WBS using BAPI_BUS2054_CHANGE_MULTI .If the level 1 WBS is not released then level 2 WBS gets created .However if the level 1 is released then level 2 WBS doesnt gets created and i get error ' User status INIT is active (WBS #1) '
Using T-code CJ20n i am able to create level 2 WBS for released level 1 WBS .

Hi;
Do you fill WBS_LEFT, WBS_UP fields for IT_WBS_ELEMENT / IT_UPDATE_WBS_ELEMENT tables.
Hierarchy is very important for between WBS.
May help below similar link:
Re: Create Whole Project with BAPI_PROJECT_MAINTAIN
Best regards.

Similar Messages

Creation of Data Control for custom java method which will return records

Hi Guys,
I have a requirement of creating a a custom java method in App module which will return a record set taking an id as input.In case of single return type it works fine but in case of returning record set it is not working.In my case i have to combine two tables and return it as a single entity as a view in Data Control.
Warm Regards,
Srinivas.

Why don't you just create a custom view object? There's even an example or 2 in the docs:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E16162_01/web.1112/e16182/intro_tour.htm#CHDGDIEC (check out "View object on refcursor" example)
Edit: you are aware that you can create a View Object based on more than one table?
John

SAP is allowing the creation of PO's for C.codes for non extended vendors

Hi Gurus
SAP is allowing the creation of purchase orders for company codes to which the vendor has not been extended. An example is PO 4500XXYYZZ for vendor number 9010577. The PO was created for company code 1111, but the vendor is not extended to company code 1111.
Please suggest how to avoid the above transaction by throwing an error.
Thanks
Sada

Yes, this is SAP Standard Behaviour Only. System Will check Whether the Vendor Hasbeen Maintained at Purchase Orgn Level during Purchase Order Creation.
During MIRO only System check whether the Vendor is Maintained at Company Code level or not Else it will not allow to Post Invoice.
You can Control this by Restricting Users to Use MK01 and Give Access to XK01
Else Use the Following Enhancement :
MM06E004 EXIT_SAPMM06E_004
Contact your abaper and Fulfil your Requirement.

Creation of WBS Element in level 2 for transation CJ01.

Hello All,
I am able to create WBS element for only one level for the transaction Cj01 through BAPI "BAPI_BUS2054_CREATE_MULTI"
Can anybody tell me how to create the WBS element in the level 2 below the first WBS element.
Thanks,

Hi
Check the link:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs;jsessionid=(J2EE3417800)ID0451304650DB10061726740868935361End?blog=/pub/wlg/9659
Regards,
Sreeram

Settlemnent rule for Non-Billable WBS at Level 2 .

Hi Folks,
We have the Finance related WBS at Level 2 one is billable & other is non billable WBS . As per the recommendation of SAP , we are generating the automatic settlement rule for Billable WBS at level 2 & all the below WBS ( which are non-billable ) & account assigned as Do not settle. ( settlemnet rule 90) .
This issue is creating a issue to the non billable WBS at level 2 created wherein we are not able to settlement due to the strategy followed as Do not settle ( Rule 90 ) for the Account assigned WBS element.
Is there any way we can settle the costs posted to the non-billable level 2 WBS to the reciever ?
Your advice to this issue will be helpful.
Thanks in advance.
Ramu

You can settle the cost of Non-billable WBSE to billable WBSE. and then from billable WBSE settle the cost to other reciever. for this to happen, you have to delete the settlement rule "do not settle" in non-billabe WBSE and write a settlement rule which settles to billable WBSE.

Config for Cost & budgeting at activity level and WBS element level in PS

Dear GURU's,
please suggest me how to do the spro configuration for budgeting and costing, here my requirement is I need to do cost planning and budgeting at WBS element level and Activity level. We two deferent types of projects.
Regards,
Bha

Hi Bhanu,
Cost planning in projects can be done through two techinques:
I. Manual cost planning (at WBS level)
1. Overall planning (Struture-oreiented planning)
2. Detailed planning (Cost element planning)
3. Unit costing
4. Easy cost planning form
II. Automatic cost planning using networks and assigned orders
For customizing: Use transaction OPUV and enter the required entries for cost planning.
Budget can do only at WBS level. For configuration do the following steps:
1. Create Budget profile - OPS9
2. Assign Budget profile in Project profile - OPSA
3. Then allot budget to your project - CJ30
hope it will be very clear. Appreciate with point if it useful.
Thanks and Regards
vetrivelan

Find WBS element of level 3 for all WBS elements underneath

Hello
I need to find WBS element of level 3 for WBS underneath (level 4, 5, 6, 7........). What is the esiest way to do it?
Shall I use WBS element structure CP-1061-01-01 ..... or a techinal id of wbs element.
Thanks

Hi,
Check the below link it may help you
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_dimp50/helpdata/EN/d3/a5112fe32311d1a6ab0000e83235d4/frameset.htm
Regards,
Marasa.

How to make mandatory(usr01) field for level 1 wbs elements only from CJ20N

Dear All,
I have made mandatory for "PRPS-USR01" field from CJ20N transaction
by using field exit. But mandatory field (usr01) is working for all wbs elements. I want to make this usr01 field mandatory for LEVEL 1(prps-stufe), WBS ELEMENTS(prps-posid) only. Not for level 2 and level 3 wbs elements. Please let me know how to fix it.
urgent.
Regards,
Karthik.

You could envisage the use of validation rules in PS.
Transaction OPSI or SPRO
Create a validation with a message ID (Z)
Create a step
- prerequisite : PRPS-STUFE = '001'
- Check : PRPS-USR01 <> ' '
affect a message number
Regards.

S_ALR_87013532 report -plan cost not rolling upto the WBS/Project level

Dear All,
Plan cost from production orders is not rolling up to the WBS/Project level in S_ALR_87013532 ( Plan/Actual Variance report).
Where as plan cost from network is properly rolling up to the WBS/Project level in the above report.
Please suggest what could be the reason for this issue. Is any configuration needs to be done for this.
Thanks & Regards,
Vishal

Dear sir,
Thanks for the reply & sorry for late response from my side.
OPSV settings are already maintained in our system.
Some how i realized later that cost are actaully getting rolled to the WBS level, but we have observed one more discrepancy.
Example -
Production order "X" value - 100 ( as seen through co03)
Production order "X"value- 40 ( as seen through report s_alr_87013532).
We found that in report s_alr_87013532 , although my total producton order value of 100 is represented at the WBS /Project level, but at the production order level , it is showing value of 40.
On further analysis we found that for production order X
Materail cost- 60
Labour cost-40
The material cost of 60 is not getting fetched against production order "X" in report " S_ALR_87013532".
There are very few cases , where such discrepancy is seen.
Kindly suggest.
Regards,
Vishal

Please help with dynamic menu creation needs to have 5 levels

Hi,
I have run into a Coldfusion problem that I was hoping you
could help me with.
What I am trying to solve is the dynamic creation of at least
5 levels of categories for a menu built with Coldfusion, and if
possible an infinite amount of levels.
Each of these also if it is at the end of the tree will have
to have products under it aswell the category will only show up if
there is products under it.
To acomplish this I have created a database table called
"Categories" which contains the fields shown in the linked
spreadsheet. I am using the "cat_parent" to hold the value of the
parent of the current record. When the parent is a top level menu
item I have assigned this a cat_parent id of "0". Using this method
I am able to do a self join on the table (where "cat_parent" =
"cat_id") to extract the relationship between parent and child
records throughout the table. This works fine. And I have created
output for 5 levels of display.
There are 3 issues left that I could not work out.
- Firstly my coding method loops through each node of the
tree with one query to create each category of the menu. This means
one query per menu category and as the client could have up to 200
categories in the menu and I am concerned that the solution that I
have come up with is too processor intensive.
- Secondly the way that I have created the category menu is
hard coding in the levels needed so there is only 5 not an infinite
amount which would be preferable but is not essential.
- Finally I could not work out how to not create "parents" in
the tree if there is no products for the end child category.
Meaning that if there is for example a category > subcategory
> subsubcategory but there is no products associated with the
end category - "subsubsubcategory" then it's parent and so on will
not display until one of them has products.
Here
is a link to a zip file that includes: the cfc that contains
the query function (categories.cfc), the page that is creating the
categories menu (lefnav.cfm), a simple cfc that contains a products
query just for testing (products.cfc) along with a spreadsheet of
the Categories table's fields.
I would greatly appreciate any suggestions.
Thanks for any time and help you can give me on this

This should at least get you started in the right direction.
http://www.sitepoint.com/article/dynamic-menu-coldfusion
Bryan Ashcraft (remove brain to reply)
Web Application Developer
Wright Medical Technologies, Inc.
=============================
Macromedia Certified Dreamweaver Developer
Adobe Community Expert (DW) ::
http://www.macromedia.com/go/team
"shunnyboy" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:e2h9hs$kp5$[email protected]..
> Hi,
>
> I have run into a Coldfusion problem that I was hoping
you could help me
> with.
>
> What I am trying to solve is the dynamic creation of at
least 5 levels of
> categories for a menu built with Coldfusion, and if
possible an infinite
> amount
> of levels.

Script level upgrade for database 'master' failed because upgrade step 'msdb110_upgrade.sql' encountered error 537, state 3, severity 16

Hello,
I've encountered issue during installation of SP1 to SQL Server 2012. After upgrade I'm getting this error in Event Log:
Script level upgrade for database 'master' failed because upgrade step 'msdb110_upgrade.sql' encountered error 537, state 3, severity 16. This is a serious error condition which might interfere with regular operation and the database will be taken offline.
If the error happened during upgrade of the 'master' database, it will prevent the entire SQL Server instance from starting. Examine the previous errorlog entries for errors, take the appropriate corrective actions and re-start the database so that the script
upgrade steps run to completion.
Can someone point me direction how I can fix it? This is a production server and currently only way to make it working is to use T902 flag in SQL Server startup params. I've found some suggestions to check Data path if it exists but it does so this is not
the issue here. Any ideas?
I've found also here
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1377073-1550-1.aspx#bm1378279
suggestions for similar issue with SQL Server 2008 which that I should do:
Via ssms:
From msdb:
Delete:
dc_admin role
Dc_operator role
Dc_proxy role
UlitityCMRReader role
UtilityIMRReader role
UtilityIMRWriter role
but for not I didn't tried it yet. This is standalone SQL Server instance.
Any help really appreciated.
Regards

Script returns the same error.
System databases:
1   1   760   -1   10   1048578   0   1   master       C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\DATA\master.mdf
2   0   12768   -1   10   1048642   0   1   mastlog       C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\DATA\mastlog.ldf
1   1   1024   -1   10   1048578   0   2   tempdev       C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\DATA\tempdb.mdf
2   0   64   -1   10   1048642   0   2   templog       C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\DATA\templog.ldf
1   1   288   -1   128   2   0   3   modeldev   C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\DATA\model.mdf
2   0   4464   -1   10   1048642   0   3   modellog   C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\DATA\modellog.ldf
1   1   28936   -1   10   1048578   0   4   MSDBData   C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\DATA\MSDBData.mdf
2   0   3352   268435456   10   1048642   0   4   MSDBLog   C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\DATA\MSDBLog.ldf
are all in place where path shows.
Before sending my message I've searched update script for "FROM master.sys.master_files" and I found script which you are showing me. I've made some digging and when I runned:
       SELECT physical_name
       FROM master.sys.master_files
       WHERE (name = N'master')
it returned also path to one my customers database name which has filename set correctly but it's Logical DB name is master and mastlog. I'm running shared hosting company and I allow my customers to restore their DBs from .bak files but I have no idea why
this customers logical name is set to master and mastlog. Probably when I change this names update script will work as it should. On the other hand in my opinion there should be some kind of fail safe mechanism for situations like this one.
EDIT: After changing logical name for DB and log for mentioned DB your script runned fine so probably now when I remove T902 flag and restart my SQL Server update will run correctly. Big thanks for resolving this issue.

Two production orders at the header level one for one single requirement

Hi Gurus, Please provide me your valuable suggestion on the issue.
*Client wants to have a only two production orders at the header level one for one single requirement .*
1) Manufacturing Order u2013 In this order for Finsihed prodcut system should pick all the assemblies whcih are manufactured inside i.e depending on the material type.\
2) Assembly order u2013 In this order system should pick all the assemblies whicih need to be assembled also procured or subcontracted items in this order against depending on the material type.
It means for Sales order of 5 EA there is going to be only 2 order ( MFG & assy order).
For Example.
L45-7000 is the header material now client wants only two production orders one Manufacture order and anothe Assmebly order , thet dont want to use Phantom assembly concept and also multiple production orders for SFG.
Please confirm if this requirement can be mapped in SAP ?
Thanks...

Hi Shishir,
As soon as each order is related to only one material, if your manufactured (or purchased) assemblies are of different materials, you will have a separate order for each material rather than a single order for all manufactured assemblies. I don't thing all your assemblies are of the same material - thus I would say no, it is not possible to map your requirement.
Regards,
Sergiy

Row level Security for BI Author Role

Hi All,
We are using OBIEE 11.1.1.5 in our project. We have a requirement where we need to configure row level security on certain column.
We are currently using external table and session variable approach to configure this. This security works fine for the users with BI Consumer
roles. But we are facing issue with configuring row level security for BI Author role.
BI Author can create any analysis in BI Answers and suppose he/she creates a report which does not contain the column on which row level
security is applied than he can see all the data. For eg.
We have one dimension Products having two levels Product Division and Brand. I want to configure security based on Product Division column.
But if BI Author create a report with only Brand and Measures than row level security is not working.
Does anyone has face this issue before.
Please let me know if you want any other information from my side.
Regards,
Vikas

If you are using a multidimensional cube you can use the "permit" command to control access to dimension members or provide cell level security within the cube. The OLAP database documentation provides on how to use the PERMIT command.
If you are using relational tables and/or views with additional CWM metadata mapped using OEM then you need to refer to the database documentation relating to Virtual Private Databases and Label Security
Business Intelligence Beans Product Management Team
Oracle Corporation

Is it possible Line level approval for purchasing requisition in AME?

hi
is it possible Line level approval for purchasing requisition in AME?
so that send each line to separate approver ?

If using AME, it should be possible. Check AME Guide for POs for details. Let me know if you run into issues.
Thanks
Shree

"Low-level" authorizations for accessing BW reports - add users to role

Using the advice in Topic "Low-level" authorizations for accessing BW reports, I have been able to publish a query to a role that has 3 test users and each user gets the same query but with different data, as determined in the tables.
Is there a way to look up the users and e-mail addresses from a table and associate them to the role? We have several hundred e-mail recipients that will not need BW access, but only need an e-mail with a static report that contains data on their own territories.

Hi!
i think programatically it might be complex. You got to maintain a seperate variant of report per user and use this variant to send mail. that means you need to maintain a variant and a Broadcast setting per user. once maintained you can use it any number of times the values will be recalculated everytime.
with regards
ashwin
<i>PS n: Assigning point to the helpful answers is the way of saying thanks in SDN. you can assign points by clicking on the appropriate radio button displayed next to the answers for your question. yellow for 2, green for 6 points(2)and blue for 10 points and to close the question and marked as problem solved. closing the threads which has a solution will help the members to deal with open issues with out wasting time on problems which has a solution and also to the people who encounter the same porblem in future. This is just to give you information as you are a new user.</i>

Issue in creation of level 2 WBS for level 1 WBS which is released

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for