Issue in Price record determination

Hello All,
Scenario:
The sales order has to determine 2 types of tax ( service , VAT)in the pricing procedure, so the customer classification has respective parameters and the price conidtions are maintained for both the condition types
the problem is when an orde is created,
the vat condition type is determined correcly with a classification from customer master,
but the service tax is getting determined incorrectly, when u see the analysis the classification determined in the price record,has the VAT tax classification copied into the pricing record
eg for vat -c customer classification is 1
for service tax customer classification is 0
in sales order - pricing analysis for service tax the price record determined is showing 1.
Any quick responses is much appreciated.

Thanks for the link
I went through the details on the link,
We tried different access sequence and different condition table and it still doenst work ,
This seems to be an issue in the standard SAP,
Eveb EC 6.0 has this issue
If there is more than one tax record in the customer master, the tax classification of the first record gets copied into all the subsequent tax condition records and during pricing determination in the sales order it picks up the wrong tax percentages

Similar Messages

Issue in Calculation schema determination for Scheduling Agreements

Dear All,
I am facing an issue in Calculation schema determination for Scheduling Agreements. The issue is -
"Appropriate calculation schema is not being determined when a scheduling agreement is being created"
The required settings which have been maintained are - The Calculation Schema (ZEIC31) has been created, Vendor Schema group has been created, Purchasing Organisation Schema group has been created, They both have been assigned to the Calculation schema in Schema determination, The Vendor Schema group has been assigned to the Vendor Master Record in master data creation.
When I am creating the scheduling agreement, the system is by default choosing the calculation schema - RM0002. Thus I am not able to put the manual condition types which have been assigned in the calculation schema - ZEIC31.
1> On what logic is the system picking that calculation schema?
2> What settings can I do to make it pick that calculation schema only which has been assigned with POrg Sch Gp and Ve Sch Gp?
Regards,
Sudhanshu

1> On what logic is the system picking that calculation schema?
As per "Define Schema Determination" in spro Purchasing document should pick the Pricing Procedure .
After creation of scheduling agreement have chacked your values in Scheduling agreement (Purchase ORG ,Schema grp in Vendor)
2> What settings can I do to make it pick that calculation schema only which has been assigned with POrg Sch Gp and Ve Sch Gp?
Check in Vendor mater is there any Plant specific Purcahsing data maintained.If it is plant specific Check purchasing data for that Plant.

Price condition determination for purchasing contract(ME31K)

Hi Experts,
     It is possible to apply price condition determination in purchasng contract(ME31K)? We had maintain the price condition for below keys: WBS/Material number and this condition record work well in purchase order. But I hope that this condition record is applied in pruchasing contract when we create contract by ME31K. Plz kindly give me a suggestion.
So I want to check the condition dtermination is whether fullfil my requirement. If we can not use the price condition determination to get the net price, then we only go for user-exit to get it.
Thank you very much in advance.

>
Gangrong Chen wrote:
> Hi Experts,
>
>      It is possible to apply price condition determination in purchasng contract(ME31K)? We had maintain the price condition for below keys: WBS/Material number and this condition record work well in purchase order. But I hope that this condition record is applied in pruchasing contract when we create contract by ME31K. Plz kindly give me a suggestion.
>
> So I want to check the condition dtermination is whether fullfil my requirement. If we can not use the price condition determination to get the net price, then we only go for user-exit to get it.
>
> Thank you very much in advance.
Why not, in me31k, click on condition button on toolbar for item conditions and for header conditions, click on menu bar path HEADER>CONDITIONS and maintain your conditions accordingly.

Transfer price records for materials

\We have activated transfer pricing for profit centres. However, all materials transfer between profit centres are not subject to transfer pricing.
But while doing any strock transfer between plants & profit centres of materials, system is error messaging that no transfer price records are maintained. It is obviously not possible to maintain price records for all materials which may be around 4000. What is the way out ?

hi..
Goto Profit Centre Accounting > Tools > Customer Enhancement > Develop Enhance for PCA
Here you will find
Document changes for data transfer (PCA00001)
Assignment of a representative material (PCA00002)
Determination of transfer prices (PCATP001)
Enhancement in the authorization check (PCAAUTHO)
Change to selection criteria for data transfer (PCASELEK)
For additional information about this enhancement, see Choose Actitvies for Exit PCASELEK
Apply as per your requirement.
kkumar

Issues during Component Batch Determination for Process Orders

Hi,
I am encountering a strange issue during component batch determination of process order.
1. During creation of process order, when I execute batch determination, systems does determination based on strategies we have set and when I click on Copy it gives an error
"Log cannot be saved: Object/subobject not specified"
Message no. BL201
*Diagnosis
Log save cancelled because at least one log contains no object or subobject.
Object and subobject are needed to classify application logs because there are several log types. Only a few logs are managed in main memory at runtime, so this classification is not needed.
If the logs are to be saved in the database, object/subobject must be specified for later retrieval.
Procedure for System Administration
Object/sub object can be passed when a log is created (function module BAL_LOG_CREATE) and changed with BAL_LOG_CHANGE.
The possible values for object and sub object must be configured in transaction SLG0.*
If I save the order with CRTD status and come back again in change mode and do determination, It works fine.
Again when the order is in REL status and do the determination, It gives the same error.
This happens only for a specific plant, In other plants batch determination works in all scenarios.
I checked for all plant related Config for batch determination and coudn't find any discrepancies.
Please advise how to resolve this issue. Thanks in advance for your help
Regards,
Aheesh

There Is no direct solution for your requirement just try this work around.
While defining the batch determination search strategy for process order in COB1, there is one column Quantity proposal where you can attach the Routines (This is written in ABAB code ) make use of this, define New Routines with ABAB help to fulfill your requirement. Try this if found useful award full points.
Regards,
Ajay Nikte

Outgoing Payment Issues - No matching records found (ODBC - 2028)

Hi Experts,
I am trying to create the add-on which automatically create Check payment against the vendor for the AP invoice and i am getting the issue, "No matching records found (ODBC - 2028)".
To know the exact reason of the issue i hardcode invoice, vendor name, cash account, bank code, bank account etc... but i am getting the same error. I also tried by using check account for both header and detail (check detail transaction) and i am getting the same error.
The weird thing is the same code work in my development and test machine but it is not working on Live machine and another development machine. The machines which is getting error is one Live company with SAP 8.8 PL13 and another is OEC demo company having SAP 8.8 PL13. I dont think there could be account missing issue since i am getting the issue in OEC demo company as well, please correct me if i am missing something.
I tried different things to resolve the issue you can see my code below where i have commented lot of things after trial.
I was trying to resolve the issue in this simple piece of code for last few weeks without any luck, so can you please help to resolve the issue. Please refer by below code which i was trying to create Outgoing payment.
            oOutgoingPayments = gCompany.GetBusinessObject(BoObjectTypes.oVendorPayments)
            oOutgoingPayments.DocType = BoRcptTypes.rSupplier
            oOutgoingPayments.CardCode = "V10000"
            'oOutgoingPayments.CardName = "Acme Associates"
            'oOutgoingPayments.CheckAccount = "_SYS00000000006"
            'oOutgoingPayments.CheckAccount = "11100000"
            oOutgoingPayments.DocDate = Date.Now
            oOutgoingPayments.DueDate = Date.Now
            'oOutgoingPayments.TaxDate = Date.Now
            oOutgoingPayments.JournalRemarks = "V10000"
            'oOutgoingPayments.TransferDate = Date.Now
            oOutgoingPayments.CashAccount = "11100000"
            oOutgoingPayments.Invoices.InvoiceType = BoRcptInvTypes.it_PurchaseInvoice
            oOutgoingPayments.Invoices.DocEntry = 89
            'oOutgoingPayments.Invoices.DocLine = 0
            oOutgoingPayments.Invoices.DiscountPercent = 10
            oOutgoingPayments.Invoices.SumApplied = 324
            'oOutgoingPayments.Invoices.Add() '// I tried with add also but no luck
            'oOutgoingPayments.Checks.CountryCode = "USA"
            oOutgoingPayments.Checks.BankCode = "BNY"
            oOutgoingPayments.Checks.AccounttNum = "145-4267-6703"
            oOutgoingPayments.Checks.Branch = "Main"
            'oOutgoingPayments.Checks.CheckAccount = "11220000"
            oOutgoingPayments.Checks.DueDate = Date.Now
            oOutgoingPayments.Checks.CheckSum = 324
            'oOutgoingPayments.Checks.Add()
            intErrCode = oOutgoingPayments.Add()
            If intErrCode <> 0 Then
                gCompany.GetLastError(intErrCode, strErrMsg)
            Else
                blnSuccessPayments = True
            End If
I will wait for your positive Feedback.
Thanks & Regards,
Naresh

Dear Naresh,
The following could be the causes of the error.
1. The BP is not avaliable in the other companies.
2. The account which you have given is wrong. I guess you are using Account segmentation so the accounts would start with _sys... so please check with the correct account settings.
Hope it helps,
Vasu Natari.

Special Price Records Error (DeleteSpecialPricesNotInB1 in SBOSpecialPrice)

When synching, my special pricing record count in SBO does not match Web Tools, and an error in SynchManager is thrown:
SynchModule
SBOSpecialPrice
Message
There are less special price records in WT than in B1. This can be due to an error in synch and can cause pricing inconsistencies.
SynchMethod
DeleteSpecialPricesNotInB1
The thing is, the record count isn't supposed to match. We do some quirky things with pricing between SBO and Web Tools via a custom synch plugin, and since the pricing only synchs from SBO to Web Tools it's not a huge deal. I was wondering, is there any way to disable the SBOSpecialPrice SynchModule altogether? Would that be a bad thing to do? Maybe I can simply hide the error from showing up in the synch - if there's a way to do that, I'd be alright with a [kludge|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kludge|A kludge (or kluge) is a workaround, a quick-and-dirty solution, a clumsy or inelegant, yet effective, solution to a problem, typically using parts that are cobbled together.] too.

Hmmmm .... I can think of 2 possible solutions.
1) Figure out how the synch knows there are less special prices and somehow make "dummy" data that fools the synch.
2) Add trigger to the PartsPricing tables and copy elsewhere as data is inserted and copy back after .. somehow. Come to think of it .. I think there's a way to write a trigger that can cancel a SQL delete. Try googling something like that.
Both of these are very risky in my opinion though.

Costing issue-Why Info record price is not read ?

Hi,
We have an issue while costing a Material procured externally.
Valuation Variant >>> Priority 1-Info record price. >>Priority 2-Material Master valuation price.
However, system is picking the price matained in the Material master.
I have verified the validity of the info record and the Blocks on the Vendor and seems ok.
Are there any specific checks need to carry out to know if the info record is a valid one.
Any idea why system is picking Price from Material Master?
Your help is appreciated.
Kind Regards
Umapathi G

HI Umapathi
Does any scheduling agreement exists for this info record
refer this link.. This issue is pretty common these days and has been discussed many times in the forum
CK11N- Material cost estimate with & without agreement
Regards
Ajay M

Price re determine issue

Dear Expert,
As per my business requirement, once sales order status profile changed form INIT to I2OK or Release to Production then prices cannot be re determine in sales orders.
currently system prices are re determining above mention status profile.
Any standard configuration is there in SAP for above issue. Please suggest. Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Himanshu Patel

Hi Kenneth:
Try changing the decimals used with the currency in:
Administration/Setup/Financials/currencies
Hope this helps
Harold Gómez

Posting date issue for COGI records.

Hi all,
I have one issue regarding the posting date for the records which are being cleared from COGI.
_In case of MF47 (Postprocessing for REM) following is the behaviour,_
In this if GR has happened on say 1st and due to stock un-availability components are gone to Post processing, Now when stock of component inwarded on say 20th then GI posting happens on 20th in post processing record clearance
_Now in case of COGI (Automatic goods movement : Error handling) behaviour is different,_
In this scenario if GR has happened on say 1st and due to stock un-availability components are gone to Post processing (COGI), Now when stock of component inwarded on say 20th then GI posting happens on 1st in post processing record clearance
I want same should be happened in case of COGI also, is there any note/ correction/option available??
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Vinayak.

Dear,
There are backlogs from the backflush in repetitive manufacturing. You can display these using Transaction MF47 and/or Transaction COGI. So schedule a job for program RMSERI11 on daily basis or hourly basis so it will clear the postprocessing errors.
But for some of the errors, it needs manual intervention like updating storage location, posting dates due to posting period block etc.
Hope clear to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

PO Price Re-Determination at the time of GR

In case of variable metal price scenarios, the Price has to be re-determined during GR and the same should be updated in PO. We have configured new Pricing Procedure for variable metal prices.
Example:
At the time of PO Creation Price is: 11 Rs/- (Gross Price =10 + Price of Variable Metal =1)
Then During GR (After 5 days from Creation date) assume that the Price of Variable Metal is increased by 2 Rs/-. Then the New Price is 13 (10+3). Now this price should be updated in PO also
Can you please let me know how we can achieve this?
Regards
Hari.
Edited by: Hari Prasad on May 19, 2011 7:06 PM

Hi,
In response to your requirement:
let me clear my business scenario...
total price of po is usd100 and sales tax is 20%.
system calculate sales tax separate the reason being the codition type for sales tax is statistical.
is it possible that the value of sales tax included in the PO net price but not calculate at the time of GR.
Regards,
Ali
This is very much possible. Include your tax condition type in the calculation of net price and make this tax as deductible.Donot assign NVV key to it.
Also donot make it statistical as you want to include it in the net price calculation.
Thanks,
Atal

Issue in Workflow - Records not created at times

Hi All,
We are using oracle workflow. I am facing an issue in live at times. Here in my case a procedure is called from a workflow function which in turn inserts records in a table automatically.
Some times even though all conditions met to insert records, there is no insertion in the particular table. Also no error is logged. The stage is also successfully passed without any error.
Please help me out to solve the issue.
Thanks and Regards,
K.Gopinath.

You can start by running wfstat.sql passing it the item_type and item_key for your workflow process and see what the workflow has done - you can check that the execution path actually went through the activity using that PLSQL code of yours.
Also, if any errors occurred, a notification must have been sent and you can see the number of such notification in the output from wfstat.sql as well.

FI-SD integration issue Error in account determination: table T030K key NECA EXD Message no. FF709

Dear expert.
Thank you for adding me at your professinal network Linkedin. I am getting some issue related to FI-SD integration.
IT's coming while releasing billing document in Tcode VF02.
Error in account determination: table T030K key XXXX EXD
Message no. FF709
I look into Tcode VKOA- Acct determination for Cust Grp Mat Grp for sales organization for EXD, OB40 - EXD AcctKey, V/08- checked procedure Zneac.
And also maintained the taxcode in Vk11.
But i am not able to understand the issue.
Please reply with valuable suggestion.
Thanks in advance.
Regards Mani.
manibhushanchoubey8 at the rate gmail dot com

Hi
Please check below links
Error in account determination:T030K
Msg no.FF709 Error in account determination: table T030K key INT VS1 I0
Note: Please search in the forum before posting the issue
Thanks
Dasaradha

Costing Issue-Previous Price changes in Accounting 1 tab in Material Master

Hi SAP Experts,
Our Client has an issue with "previous price" field under the "Accounting 1" tab in Mateial master .The issue is that client never did costing to this material XXXXXXwith plant XXXX. But system is showing value in the "previous price" field. We have checked whether previious cost estimate exists. There was no previous cost estimate and still the system updated "previous price" field.
Can anyone let me know in which cases the system updates "Previous Price" field in Material Master ?
Your help is highly appreciated.
Kind Regards,
K.S.K

Hi
May be this material was created with reference to the same material in other plant or with ref to some other material or may be costing run was deleted from CKR1
br, Ajay M

Content Conversion issue for header record

Hi,
We have a very urgent question on an issue here with one of our XI objects.
This is an inbound interface from an external system into R/3 & BW. The inbound file has a header record (with about 8 fields) and detail records (about 900 fields per detail record). Data going into R/3 & BW don't have header records and everything goes in as detail records. One field from the header of this source file should be passed to the target structure at the detail level. Also, we are NOT using BPM.
Can someone help us how we could define the file content conversion parameters for File adapter.
Thanks in advance ......
Prashant

I'm so sorry, I wasn't subscribed to this thread and I didn't realize there were responses.
If you have a message type made up of a Header with 1 occurence and Detail with 1 to unbounded occurunces, you'd want to do the following in content conversion:
Document Name - your message type
Document Namespac - your message type namespace
Recordset Structure - Header,1,Detail,*
Recordset Structure - Ascending
Then you'll need to set some of the parameters, depending on the layout of your incoming file.
As for the problem of having hundreds of fields, I'm less sure about that.
Would it be possible to break your detail data type down into smaller data types. Each with fewer fields. You'd still have to maintain every field in content conversion, but at least they'd be in seperate parameters, instead of all 900 in one tiny box.
Here's a very rough example of what I mean:
If you have 900 fields, instead of making 1 data type of detail, you could make 9 data types, Detail1, Detail2, Detail3, Detail4, Detail5, Detail6, Detail7,Detail8, Detail 9, each with 100 fields in them (or more with even less fields).
Setting things up the file content conversion would be more complex in this scenario, so it might be a toss up if it's worth it to break it up this way or not if it meant configuring quite a few more parameters.
For example,
You'd have to declare your recordset structure like Header,1,Detail1,,Detail2,,Detail3,* etc, and you'd have to make sure to set the .endSeparator to '0' for all of the first 8 details, so it would recognize that they were all on one line.
I hope this helps a little bit.

Issue in Price record determination

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for