Issue regarding to change taxcode in tab Gl-account for T.cod MIR7

Hi Expert,
I have issue regarding Tax code in Tab Gl-account for t.cod MIR7 which come by-default , i wan to change that taxcode based on purchase order number which also have tax code with multiple line item in tab PO Refrence,,i want first taxcode of tab PO Refrence to be copied in first line item of tab GL-account  based on po number ,can anyone put a light on this issue with priority..
Regard's,
shaikh khalid.

Hi,
You can clear the old items posted in 28000 with the other leg in suspense / clearing GL Account.
Once the above is done, please post once again to Vendor clearing the suspense / clearing account.
Ensure that the suspense / clearing account does not have any open items.
The lines are transfered to new recon account.
Hope this helps, if yes, please assign points.
Regards,
Sankar

Similar Messages

  • The "organize bookmarks" section has disappeared from my bookmarks dropdown. I want to export my list as back-up prior toan overhaul. No major changes have been done to account for it. in English

    The "organize bookmarks" section has disappeared from my bookmarks dropdown. I want to export my list as back-up prior toan overhaul. No major changes have been done to account for it. in English
    I have tried the usual suspects to no avail - the item remains stubbornly hidden

    It's called "Show All Bookmarks" now. You can also open it by pressing CTRL+SHIFT+B

  • How to change the BP-customer Control Account for entering Opening Balance

    Hi experts,
    I am working on a project where I have used the segmented chart of account and segment is branch.
    Project is under SAP B1 8.8 PL 05.
    Customer has 2 branches. Now both the branch have different control account for debtors. Customer (BP) master is common for both the branches.
    Now at the time of entering BP-Customer opening balance, I do not find the provison to select/change of control account. So all the opening balance entered will go into one control account only, which is set in business partner master for particular customer.
    In SAP B1 8.8 at transaction level like Sales Invoice, there is provision to select the control account. Now I believe entering opening balance is the similar functionality as Sales Invoice and there should be provison for selection of control account to user.
    Anyboady has any Idea / work around ?
    Incase there is no provison then, I believe Product development team should take this in development of SAP B1 8.8.
    BR
    Samir Gandhi

    Hi,
    I suggest you to import BP opening balance by JE template of DWT in which you just put account code as your control segmented account and additional information in "shortname" field with customer/vendor code.
    Hope this helps,
    Son.

  • HotSynch issues: can't change any settings in User Accounts, can't rename or delete, can't sync!

    Hello,  I am running Windows XP Pro Version 5.1.2600.  My wife and I both have Palm Treo 700p smartphones running Palm OS 5.2H. 
    Her phone has been having continual issues with some third-party software.  Each time we would attempt to sync her phone after installation we would get the same error message:
    HotSync Exchange synchronization failed
    HotSync Error: Unknown error. (FE00)
    We have tried to contact the software developer for the third-party application with no luck.  They simply insist that there is nothing wrong with their software. Mind you, the phone would always sync with no issues before we installed the third-party software, but that's neither here nor there.  Point being her phone would not sync no matter what I tried.
    I searched the troubleshooting articles for HotSync issues and found that the only solution that might help would be to update our Palm Desktop from version 4.2 to  6.2.  After installing the new Palm Desktop I was able to sync my 700p.  However, when I attempted to sync my wife's 700p it still did not work.  When I tried to access the HotSync log on the desktop it would only show the log for my phone.  Her name would show up in the list of users, but once I tried to select it my name would appear in the window.  When I attempt to open the "User Accounts" window in the HotSync Manager the application freezes and I must shut it down.  I am unable to delete or rename the User accounts.  
    Now we are stuck not being able to sync her phone and not being able to fix the issue.  She has a lot of files on her phone which she spent a lot of time working on, hundreds of hours, to get them where she needs them.  Our concern is that in the process of fixing the HotSync issue she'll lose her work.  We need a solution.  Any assistance you can offer would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Sam
    Post relates to: Treo 700p (Verizon)
    Post relates to: Treo 700p (Verizon)

    Versamail is a email application on the device. As for the backup folder you may have renamed it follow these steps (You may not need to hard reset the device. You can skip that part)
    To fix this what we need to do is hard reset your device. The instructions to do that is here http://kb.palm.com/wps/portal/kb/common/article/887_en.html this tells you how to do all types of resets. Also, what we need to do is rename your backup folder. What this folder is, it hold all your programs from the last time you synced your PC. On your computer go here
    Palm Desktop 4.2 and below
    My Computer--> C drive --> Program files --> Palm/PalmOne--> your hotsync username
    Palm Desktop 6.2.2
    My Documents/Documents --> Palm OS Desktop --> your hotsync username
    Right click on your backup folder and rename it to "backupOld". Resync your device to the same user name and you will get all your contacts, calendar, tasks, and memos.
    You can install the programs again but make sure they are compatible with the device. Also try one program again and wait 24 hours to see if the same thing happens again. This way you know what program is causing the issue.

  • Price difference due to changed POD qty how to account for this ?

    Hi Gurus,
    I am having delivering goods after activating POD at item level and customer master. My delivery document the qty is 10 tons , Due to pilferage transportation loss etc the qty is reduced to  9.5 tons. After confirming POD , i am billing for 9.5 tons. The difference of 0.5 ton how to account. I am also maintianing the VPRS condition in my pricing procedure. How does it affect my costing ?how to do the price diference posting and where?

    Check the following SDN thread:
    - Re: Accounting Entry for Loss in Transit.
    Regards
    JP

  • HT4865 How can I change the incorrectly listed cellular number for SMS code

    I listed my iPad cellular number incorrectly to receive an SMS code which musted be listed to progress further. So I cannot retreive the four digit number
    which was sent to the incorrect number. How can I change it to the correct cellular number?

    From http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4644:
    Devices using iOS 7.0.3 or later: Tap Settings > iCloud > Account, then tap Keychain. Check that the phone number listed under Verification Number is correct. If not, enter another phone number.
    Macs using OS X Mavericks v10.9 or later: Choose Apple () menu > System Preferences. Click iCloud, then click Account Details. Check that the phone number listed under Verification number is correct. If not, enter another phone number.

  • Taxcode v1 does not exist for jurisdiction code

    Dear Guru's,
    I am getting the above error msg while posting the invoice, even after maintaining the jurisdiction code for the above tax code in customisation.
    I am getting these things while working with taxinj in 4.7 IDES.
    any puts ?
    regds,
    Channa

    hi
    try deleting the Jurisdiction code from TX OBCP & then from OBCO.
    maintain tax procedure and assign it to your country in OBBG.
    Then try maintaining TAX codes already created in FTXP.

  • The unit of issue cannot be changed because the material is used in BOM.

    Hi Pals
    Please could you help with the following:
    I have a request to change value in unit of issue field (Work Scheduling tab), current value if ZPC and i need to remove it and leave field blank.
    When i delete this value and press enter error message occurs: "The unit of issue cannot be changed because the material is used in a BOM" (Message no. M3214).
    I've removed this material from all BOMs at concerns plant level, but this doesn't help.
    Under cs15 tcode, SAP still sees deleted BOM history and probably this stops SAP to allow to change unit of issue.
    Do you know how to remove BOMs without history. And mainly, how to solve this problem.
    Thank you in advance
    Regards
    Andrey

    Hi R.Brahmankar
    thank you for support!
    you wrote:
    Dear,
    Please refer OSS note 215970 It will resolve this issue.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar
    I searched in note you gave: and there are 3 reports mentioned:
    1. ZZITMTC4 - selection report without update option
    2. ZZITMTD4 - selection report with update option
    3. ZZITMTD5 - selection report per each material with update option
    4. ZZITMTDOC - selection report with document entry and update option
    To be honest, i don't know how to use those reports...
    I searched in GRR3 tcode for such, but no such reports exist.
    Please could you advise how to use those reports.
    Thank you
    Best Regards
    Andrey

  • I am having an issue regarding a placed order via customer service department

    I recently relocated to Anchorage Alaska as part of a permanent change of station per the United States Air Force. I was initially located on the East Coast in the lower 48 and at the time of activating my contract I had purchased two separate Iphone 4 devices. I also recently went in to a store in February to purchase a Nexus 7 as well.
    Upon arrival in Anchorage I had multiple issues regarding the Iphone 4 devices including being unable to send and receive text messages & imessages, unable to make phone calls, dropped phone calls, unable to utilize GPS, as well as not being able to access general account information and use anything related to web browsing or data usage. It was determined that because the Iphone 4 operates on the 3g network and Verizon does not have a 3g network in Alaska, as a result I was utilizing an extended service network from another carrier. As a result of this I am only able to use my Iphone 4 devices while connected to my wi-fi network while within my home, which is totally unacceptable.
    I was not made aware that I would be dealing with this when I moved to Alaska and inquired as the the use of the devices I currently owned prior to purchasing the tablet. I was assured by three separate store employees one of which being a manager that all devices would function at 100% efficiency including the Iphone 4s. In fact I was recently billed 350$ for roaming charges last month, which prompted me to speak with a representative via the online chat regarding the significant increase she said that she was unable to process any sort of credit to the account regardless of what I had been told at a local Verizon store where I purchased the tablet.
    As a result of all of these mishaps since arriving here in Alaska I determined I was in need of newer devices that utilize the 4G LTE network currently provided by Verizon in Alaska. I know for a fact that the 4G LTE works great up here because my Nexus 7 tablet runs flawlessly and does not incur roaming charges when utilizing the 4G LTE network.
    Yesterday I attempted to contact Verizon through the live chat feature regarding upgrading two of the devices on my account. The live chat representative immediately asked me when my upgrade date was. Upon telling her my upgrade date 9/29/2014 she told me I should contact the customer service department as I might be eligible for an early upgrade. I then proceeded to contact the customer service department using my Iphone 4.
    My attempt to speak to anyone in the customer service department resulted in a merry-go-round of being put on hold 6 separate times by two different employees, both of which had me wait for more than an hour while they attempted to speak to a manager to gain approval for an early upgrade. The first rep seemed almost sure she would be able to have my devices upgraded early especially considering the issues I was having regarding service.
    The second rep seemed newer and was very dodgy about my questions and was very unwilling to help at first. He even mentioned that I had been a Verizon customer for almost two years, had never missed a single payment and had outstanding account history which should have garnered some sort of importance to the level of my request. But I digress, during this time I was disconnected from the call twice from each separate representative.
    Both reps assured me they would call me back, I never did get a call back from either one of those reps and I was becoming very frustrated having waited four hours trying to find some sort of solution to my current predicament.
    After waiting an hour for the second representative to call back I grew impatient and contacted the customer service department, was put on hold again, and finally reached a third customer service representative who was able to provide a solution for me.
    I explained everything I had been dealing with to Cory ID #  V0PAC61, both regarding the phones, the issue of the level of service I was receiving, the dire need for working devices and the multiple times I had been disconnected. I explained to him as a result of these issues I was certainly considering switching to a different provider, a local provider even who could provide me the adequate service that I require for my mobile devices.
    I explained to Cory that I had been with Verizon for almost two years, and I had been on a relatives account prior to owning my own Verizon account and had never received this kind of treatment when trying to work towards a simple solution. Cory proceeded to tell me he needed to put me on hold to see if there was anything that could be done regarding the upgrades of the device considering all of the trouble I had been dealing with.
    After Cory reconnected with me in the phone call he was able to successfully reach a solution by allowing me to upgrade my devices. We conversed about the options available and I eventually decided to upgrade both Iphone 4 devices to Moto X devices as we determined those would be sufficient for my needs while in Alaska. I also proceeded to add two Otter Box Defender cases to the order so that the devices would have sufficient protection. Cory inquired as to whether or not I would like to purchase insurance for the phones as well and I opted for the $5.00 monthly insurance which including damage and water protection.
    Cory explained to me the grand total for the devices which included an activation fee of $35.00 for each device, $49.99 for each Otter Box case, and an additional $50.00 for each device which would be refunded as a rebate upon receipt of the devices and activation, a rebate that I would be required to submit. Cory explained to me that the devices would most likely arrive Tuesday of 6/17 and no later than Wednesday 6/18.
    Cory took my shipping information and told me everything was all set and the only thing left to do was to transfer me to the automated service so that I could accept the 2 year agreement for both devices. I thanked him very much, took his name and ID# so that I might leave positive feedback about his exemplary customer service and was then transferred to the automated service.
    Once transferred to the automated service I was then prompted to enter both telephone numbers for the devices that would be upgraded, I was then required to accept the new 2 year agreement for both devices and after doing so I was required to end the call. I did so in an orderly fashion and expected a confirmation # to arrive in my email regarding the placed order.
    I have never received a confirmation email. I decided to sleep on it and assumed a confirmation email would be sent sometime tomorrow. Nothing has since been received however. I woke up early this morning around 6AM Alaska time to speak to another live chat representative, Bryan, in the billing department who assured me the order was currently processing and verified the order #. I asked him whether or not it was typical for a customer to not receive a confirmation email for an order placed and he said it can sometimes take up to 2-3 business days. He then stated that he had taken note of the issues I was experiencing and told me he would transfer me to the sales department as they would be able to provide more information regarding the shipment of both devices and a confirmation email, as he stated he did not want me to have to wait any longer than necessary to receive said devices.
    I was then transferred to Devon in the sales department via the live chat service where I was then required to repeat everything I had said to both Bryan and the other representatives I had spoken too. After a lengthy discussion and repeating everything I have just wrote he told me the order was indeed processing and that he would send a confirmation email in the next 30 minutes.
    That was 2 hours ago. It is now 8am Alaska time and I still have not received a confirmation email regarding my order. I was sent an email by Verizon an hour ago stating I had a device to "discover". The email contained no information regarding the shipment of my device, the order confirmation number, or anything regarding my account. The email I received was a typical spam email asking an individual to check out the current available phones and sign up for a new contract.
    All I want is a confirmation email to assure that the devices are being sent. I need my phone for work and to communicate with my family in the lower 48. I desperately need to make sure that the device is in fact being sent to the proper address, this is why a confirmation email of the order is so important. I do not care about the shipping speed I just want what I ask to be taken care of for a change. I would hate to sit here unable to determine what the status of my devices are only for the order to be stuck in "processing" limbo and be unable to receive the devices when I was told they would be sent.
    I feel I have been given the run around treatment way more than is typically given with any company when an individual is trying to work towards a solution. I have been patient and cordial with everyone I have spoken with, I have not raised my voice or shown stress or anger towards the situation I have only tried my best to work towards a solution with anyone I have spoken too but I am becoming increasingly frustrated with this situation.
    Any help regarding this matter would be greatly appreciated. This situation has left a sour taste in my mouth and if the devices were indeed not actually processed in an order, or they were not shipped correctly, or in fact if the order had never existed at all it will only deter me from keeping my Verizon account active and affect my decision to switch to another provider.

        Hello APVzW, we absolutely want the best path to resolution. My apologies for multiple attempts of replacing the device. We'd like to verify the order information and see if we can locate the tracking number. Please send a direct message with the order number so we can dive deeper. Here's steps to send a direct message: http://vz.to/1b8XnPy We look forward to hearing from you soon.
    WiltonA_VZW
    VZW Support
    Follow us on twitter @VZWSupport

  • Payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563

    Hi Payroll Experts,
    I have a payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563 (October PY Run)
    When i m runnning the Current month Payroll(October PY Run), Total Earning - total deductions are not matching with Net Pay. later i came to know that the system creates the WT /561 and deducts from the Net Pay.
    But as per the Employee Payment Details , there is no recovery required from the employee for the past one year. But even then the system creates the WT /561. and deducts the same from NET Pay.
    The followng are the WT details
    IN - Period
    OCT 2011
         /101 Total gross amount     118,897.00
         /110 Net payments/deductions     76,070.00-
         /550 Statutory net pay     95343
         /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     37,692.00-
         /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment      37,692.00-
         /559 Bank transfer                                                   34,317.00
         /560 Net pay     37,218.00
         /563 Claim from previous month     5,609.00
    FOR Period
    Sept- Oct
         /101 Total gross amount     49,213.00
         /110 Net payments/deductions      31,721.00-
         /550 Statutory net pay     41,529.00
         /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     14,591.00
         /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment     23,101.00-
         /553 Recalc.diff.to last payr.     37,692.00
         /559 Bank transfer                                                   14,591.00
         /560 Net pay     14,591.00
         /561 Claim     5,609.00
    I request  some body to  throw siome light on the same.

    Hi Experts,
    Thanks for everyone for replying to my query ,
    I have a doubt that If you check the WTs /551 and /552  in the IN PRD, the negative sign is coming for both the WTs
    Is it correct?
    And also, Assume that there may be a master data changes like Bank details and other deduction Wts happened in the month of Aug and now i m going to run the payroll for the month of Nov,
    some of the employees having differences in the Net Pay, Eventhough the employee is having sufficient balances.
    So how do i handle this issue
    IS ther any way to solve this differences?
    Please Let me know how to solve this issue.
    Thanks

  • SAP QM Issues regarding follow-up action after Usage Decision

    Dear Gurus -
    Kindly need your expertise to resolve these issues regarding follow-up action.
    1. After taking the UD i need to trigger the follow-up action to send an email with the long text to a group of people. As per standard SAP the email goes to the person taking the UD. Kindly can some one explain what & where do i need to make the changes. Also please let me know what is the customized Email ID table where mail ID's will be stored which fuction module can extract.
    2. Can i also use the same functionality for partial lots during inprocess inspection. I need to send an email to a group in case the valuation is rejected for that operation.
    Any response is highly appreciated.
    Thank You.
    Edited by: sunil t on Jan 6, 2010 7:03 PM

    Hi
    Please go through my recent thread
    Incomming Inspection Auto mail if Rejected
    Regards
    Sujit

  • GR/IR clearing issue due to change in configuration.

    Hello,
                 We have a production issue. User has entered Purchase Order and entered Goods Receipt. Later it was realized that it was posting to an incorrect GR/IR clearing account. So as per the valuation class, correction has been made to the configuration (old GR/IR account replaced by new GR/IR account). After that the Invoice Receipt is posted. Now the issue is, we are unable to clear these GR/IR accounts. Because there exists two different GR/IR accounts for Goods Receipt and Invoice Receipt. Tried the transaction code F-03, but no success. Please help.
    Thank you

    Hi Jitesh,
    I believe, that though there are several debit and credit line amounts pertaining to GR/IR Clearing account. System will do clear with transaction F.13 based on sort key information at GL Account.
    If the GL Account Sort Key gets changed, then to be cleared manually with T.Code F-03. Here you will not be in a position to clear if the debit and credit items are huge.
    Then go to FBL3N, match the both credit and debit with same information at Assignment field and do Clearing with F.13
    As we know, it is very big taks. You have to struggle for which the mistake was happend and ensure that the sortkey should not be changed where there are line items to be cleared.
    Regards
    VG

  • Issue with PO change output - Service line items

    Hi All,
    This is issue with PO change output. We have PO with line item 10, 20 and item 10 has 4 service line items. PO is approved and initial print out is taken.
    Some one goes and makes changes to 1st service line items of PO line item 10.
    A change output gets triggered. When this output is printed, it prints line item 10 details. This is standard functionality as this item is changed. But its printing all the service line items for this PO line item. Consider a case where there are 3000 service lines for a PO item. If I add 1 service item to this PO line item, the change form prints 3001 services for that line item. There were no changes done to first 3000 service line items.
    Currently PO change form takes care of changes at PO line item but it does not take care of changes at service line item level.
    Is there any setting that needs to be done for this so that it only considers the changes at Service line item level also.
    Regards,
    Shahu

    If you're using a standard form, send a message to SAP. Otherwise make a change in the form.

  • Issue regarding job SAP_CCMS_MONI_BATCH_STARTUP_DP

    Hi,
    We are facing an issue regarding an event triggered job SAP_CCMS_MONI_BATCH_STARTUP_DP.
    Details of the job
    ABAP Program -> RSAL_BATCH_TOOL_STARTUPDISP
    User -> DDIC
    Job Frequency -> Event Periodic
    Event -> SAP_MONITORING_STARTUP_DISPATCH
    We performed Database Refresh and this job has come from Source System. We have deleted the job in Target System but after that also we are getting continuous error message in SM21.
    Error message is as follows:
    14:33:36 DIA  001 000 SAPSYS                EA  S Failed to reschedule a periodic job
    14:33:36 DIA  001 000 SAPSYS                EB  C > Job SAP_CCMS_MONI_BATCH_STARTUP_DP
    On digging down we got the below information in SM21 regarding the error:
    Documentation for system log message EA S :
    This message is output by one of the job schedulers active in the
    system (e.g. time or event-based scheduler). It indicates a problem
    related to the database. An attempt was made to reschedule a periodic
    job and write the respective control data in the database. This error
    occurred for one of the associated database operations (for example,
    INSERT or UPDATE).
    Another cause of the error is failure to generate a new job ID number.
    A subsequent message will point this out.
    The following courses of action are possible:
    Check whether there are any other notes on this problem next to this
    message in the system log, for example direct messages from the
    database interface. These details generally bring you closer to the
    actual cause of the problem.
    The additional information for this message contains the name of the
    database table for which the error occurred.
    If you determine that the error occurred during the SELECT access to
    table TBTCI, the internal report belonging to this background job has
    been deleted. In this case, there is normally a background job in the
    'terminated' status, which ended due to runtime error
    'LOAD_PROGRAM_NOT_FOUND'. Delete this job to prevent further
    unnecessary scheduling on the part of the background processing
    scheduler. You must then reschedule the job concerned.
    As rescheduling of the periodic job could not be completed
    successfully, this job is not executed at first. The background
    processing scheduler takes this job and attempts to schedule it again.
    Depending on the repetition period, gaps in running the background jobs
    can occur for successful scheduling (i.e. the background jobs that were
    unsuccessfully scheduled will be missing in the job overview if their
    execution date elapsed in the meantime).
    Since the next start of the periodic job could not be scheduled
    correctly, there is no entry in the job overview for the planned start
    date.
    If the system failed to generate the job ID number, you will find notes
    on what to do next in the long text of the respective system log
    message.
    We have fixed also Background Object in SM61.
    Kindly help to fix this issue. Looking forward for reply.
    Thanks,
    Soumya

    I am also facing similar issue  . I found below SM21 entries daily . becoz of this my system  performance becomes slows down. no idea which tables are getting filled up  due to this .
    > Job SAP_CCMS_MONI_BATCH_STARTUP_DP
    Failed to reschedule a periodic job
    For temporary fix we have changed the below memory parameters when system performance is poor .
    EM/TOTAL_SIZE_MB = 16384
    ES/SHM_SEGS_VERSION = 2
    ES/TABLE = SHM_SEGS
    But we need to fix these system log entries as still we are getting these errors. If anybody knows the permanent fix of this error that will be great for us.
    Regards
    Krishna

  • Issue regarding consecutive run for an Interface

    hi all,
    i have an issue regarding an interface
    if this Interface is a initial run for the file, you have to populate all the data of the people. That is , unlike other interfaces where we send only the latest record, in this interface we need to send all the records of the employees. in a employee has 10 records with different dates, we will pick up all the records greater than 1999 and pass it. whereas if there is a change in one field, then we will send all the record of that file. And If it is a consecutive run  then you have to populate changes only. the following algorithm can help you in this
    if intial_run EQ 'X'
    transfer IT_FINALDATA to XI.
    else
    Declare a 2 more internal tables similar to IT_FINALDATA...for our below example let us assume that
             DATA: IT_CLUSTERDATA type standard table of IT_FINALDATA.
             DATA: IT_COMPAREDATA type standard table of IT_FINALDATA.
    use the following statement to retrieve the data from cluster and comparing it
            IMPORT IT_CLUSTERDATA TO IT_COMPAREDATA  FROM DATABASE indx(zn) ID 'IN_8085'.
            Compare IT_COMPAREDATA with IT_FINALDATA
    If sy-subrc = 0.
    Means there are no changes, and no output required
    Else
    Pass the data to XI interface,  And store the internal table in the same INDX table, using the following statement
    EXPORT IT_FINALDATA to  IT_CLUSTERDATA FROM DATABASE indx(zn) ID 'IN_8077'.
    Endif.
    In this  can we deliver the changed data at every single consecutive run.
    Please let me  know,
    Thank Q
    Rohini.

    This is something where HR Interface Toolbox (PU12) can be very helpful, it will take care of changes from one run to another and you can configure it to send changes only in next run. But, you will need some ABAP in its user exits to restrict the data after 1999, and any other restrictions that you might want.

Maybe you are looking for